WI- - IRC · chulha, etc. That ... The major objective of this survey was to study the status of latrines ... 1e true 1n case of all tl» surveyed diet ríete except. for Etawah

2 2

I N.U T 8 9

SPOT SURVEYSANITATION ACTIVITIES

WI-TH E RURAL AREAS

0F

UTTAR PRADESH

!N n¿i\'NATIONAL REFERENCE CL 'NTî--:-."»1 GOMM!.; -.;jTY WATER SUPPLY ANDSANITATION

Ô

O

DIRECTORATE OF I»ANCHAYAT! RAJGOVERNMENT. Of UP., tUCKNOW

1

SPOT SURVEY

SANITATION ACTIVITIES

IN

THE RURAL AREAS

OF

UTTAR PRADESH

; ; — ••::: ••.

i "i 6Í.i

LO.-»

oo«oo

:Ah i'. I ' : i !.:.'

í:?o. :;)3lí)0(070) 8149

A f —^

mn !

-.••Í-.:.ATEC

250911 ext

, . . , A i • . , . . • • • 1 " f í , " i i r S

•••!'•: '.'<-V; ^ • . v v ' i i . Ü i - ^ L Y s

• íA O "ir., ;••.•, . • »

141/142

DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYATI RAJGOVERNMENT OF U.P., LUCKNOW

•1999

K. K. JAISWAL Department of Panchayati RajS e c r c t 6 r y Govt. of Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow : Dt. August l6, 1989

P R E F A C E

The Government of Uttar Pradesh is committed to the goal set '

under the Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Decade (1981-90).

Providing sanitary facilities to one-fourth of the rural population

has been one of the thrust areas in this regard. Towards this end,

the State Government initiated « programme on rural' sanitation with

UKICEF collaboration in 1985 covering eleven districts, where other

social inputs were also being provided by USICEF. This was to have

a multiple effect on the most vulnerable groups, i.e. women and'children.

The plan was to have around b,000 household latrines and provide

sanitary facilities to schools after providing health and hygiene

education to villagers and school teachers and motivating them. The

basic concept was to involve local community to the extent possible

right from conception to planning, implementation and monitoring.

In order to get a feel of this programme under field conditions,

a spot survey was undertaken in 1933 through the senior staff members

of this department and also UMCEF, Lucknow. The survey covered

nearly 20 per cent of the household latrines and more than 80 per cent

of school latrines. The results of this survey, besides creating a

bench-mark for future evaluation and impact studies, will help in

rectifying the 'lacunae noticed in the present planning and implementation

process. The lessons learnt will also facilitate better implementation

of the Intensive Santiation Project carved out for Allahabad and

Sultanpur this year.

I place on record my appreciation for all those involved in the

various stages of this survey.

SecretaryPanchayati Raj DepartmentGovt. of U.P., Lucknow

SPOT SURVEY ON SANITATION

BACKGROUND:

i Improved ¡omit-.» k*i Ivs . beer» one of tin? major components of theinterventions to reduce- noibidity a»">cl mortality among people 1n general*nd children in particular. According to a WHO (World Health<Vy*nisat1on) estimate, tiore th*n three-four tie of tine' diseases arecaused by unsafe water and filth. It has now been well established thata were provision of safe.water source 1s not adequate to bring down thisIncidence of water borne diseases unless 1t Is accompanied by propersanitary practices. It 1s In this context that the U.N. Internat analDrinking Water Supply ai\ci Sanitation Decade (1981-90) lays emphasis onboth water and sanitation. The ©overnnrent of India wliich has been adonatory to this U.N.'resolution; has, among other things, envisaged a25% coverage of rura~\ pojxilation with sanitary facilities by T990.

2. In pursuance to the goal laid down by the Government of India, theGovernment of Uttar Pradesh, 1ri close wxi active collaboration withUNICEF, had 1nt1t1ated a prograffwe on rural sanitation In elevendistricts 1n .1985. This: i ograawie aiiwed at promoting awaneiiess among thel eople on Improved sanitary habits backed by the construction of varioussanitary facilities suchas latrine, garbage pit, soak pit, smokelesschulha, etc. That sanitaticxi 1s not related to only latrine butencompasses a package of health-related activities was the highlight ofthis programme.

THE ISSUE:

3 Tlie .pixxjraiKi'e, ai»o*ig oilier things, h^d a target of constructing3,860 household latrines and 143'.'-«chool latrines. As; against this, alittle over 2800 houseliold latrines mnd 130 SCI^KJOI latrines had beencompleted <by t)ie end of 1987 as indicated 1n the following'table:

DISTRICT-WISE PROGRESS UNDER SANITATION

ST.No.

C1

** •

neC7C*C9T*

Name of Distr ict

BandaPast i

Ajfwfny-ai^hEtahEtõwahFateinxtr

Sõfvãr«fi|>ip.

Sitõjjur

T o t a l :

Blocks(Nos.)

4

333373333

39

ipuselioldTarget

423417357300390290373373290357290

3880

l a t r ines'Achievermerit.

378414

8624760

312307372144189314

2823

SchoolTarget

—--

19192019202026

143

la t r inesAchieve-ment

——_

10. 1 9

2019191925

131

: 1 :

Location of tl» project areas has been presented 1n tlie enclosedTlx? DlroctoiMe of Panct)ayat1 Raj was tl*í nodal agency for

of this programiHC. The activities were spread over 39blocks. Willie the Panchayriti Udyog was Involved In the manufacturing ofpan ««id trap, the actual construction was done through the local masons,

were trained under tlwí programme.

5. Considering the fact that the latrines were constructed over awider area, with several functionaries Involved 1n 1t and under'diversified geographical, social a/xi economic conditions, 1t 1s necessaryto Know as to what extent the technical specifications envisaged could befollowed and the quality of construction ensured. It 1s also Inoperativeto observe how far the latrines are actually put to use. Theavailability of other sanitary facilities such as garbage pits, soakagepits, smokeless chuihas, bathing cubicles, etc. 1s aleo to be assessed tofind out whether the programme has made' any dent 1n other relevantareas. This called for undertaking a simple and quick spot survey ofboth household and school latrine© 1n the eleven districts covered undertlie sanitation programme.

OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE SURVEY;

6. The major objective of this survey was to study the status oflatrines (both household and school) reportedly completed, assess theextent of their utilisation and suggest corrective measures, 1f any, forbetter Implementation of the programme 1n so far as 1t 1s related toconstruction of latrines and Its usage. Within this broad frame-work,

specific objectives; of the survey ware:-

To observe tho pfiysical featurest he spec 1 f : ca t i onss and noitíis env

of die latrines 1n relation to

To look at vix- quality of construction as compared to thestandards laid down. •

To ascertain the progress pertaining to the construction ofsuperstructure and Its condition (for household latrines only).

To assess the extent of utilisationIssues, 1f any, related to the same.

of the latrines and the

To find out rhf> v«r11«biT1t.y of other s^nit^ry facilities euch aspits, st»nk«iye pits, bathit'ig cubicles;, sitokeiess

To suggestquality of

corrective roeasures which will .help to Improve theconstruction, better usages of the latrines andof other sanitary facilities 1n a household.

15. * .a t r ine Usage; of tii<> 478 latr ines const rue ttxl upto p l in th level ,373 (78%) are In w:;e. Amtxtg * '» d is t r i c ts surveyíxl, Sah&riuipUr r*nksHret with a cent pnrocnt usage rate follow**! by Sultanpur, Azamyarh,31tai*»r aixl '(teoria (83-85%). Ftawah has UKÍ lowest usage; lees than halfof the units are being ut i l ise*! .

An awytiry undo me to wl»y thes l a t r i n e are not used Ijy al d , revealed llw* following 1n order of their Importance.

- absoict» of a superetructure.- wrong el te selection.- ava i lab i l i ty of service latr ines,- defective construction.

In some areas small children »re restrained to use the latrine forthe fear of getting trapped 1n the pan hole. Some people'prefer freshair and open space for defecation. For them, sitting Inside a latrineaf.ouMts to getting Into a cage. Fora few, particularly, those having aixxjf a> top, the utility of a latrine 1s felt wore during monsoon. It 1elieartening to note that among the family memters, women are. the mostregular users of tlie latrines followed by children sii^d uten, ¡ {¡',} /, •

16. Maintenance: How well 1s a lat r ine maintained can lie assessed bylooking at how clean ^tre U*e pan, the platform and the lirrnediatesurrounding. The' Investigators were advised to categorise theirobservations under tlvee groups v i z . , very clean, reasonably clean amid i r t y . No specific, parameter(s) was suggested for th is purpose, andhence the results are based on value Judgment. However, considering thefiiaturity àtMt experience of the Investigators, tlie var1atr1on 1n such

anong tliem 1s expected to be mfniniHn. •

Mo»le tlvtn one--third (36%) of tlie latrit ies 1n use were found to beêry clean whereas around three-f i f ths (59%) wei e reasonably clean; Ohlyone out of every ?0 latr ines was fomxl to be d i r t y . Among tlie d i s t r i c t s ,

anel Salv^ranixr Iwsve tiie iriqest well nraintained' la t r ines.

17 Other Sanitary Fac1l1t1eg» Ótlier . «anitary f a c i l i t i e s , for thepurpose' of present analysis, Include smoke.lesB chulltas, soak p i t , bathingplatform' &\d garbage, p i t . TIKJ purpose'of obtaining Information on th isaspect w*s to know»now far tlie liquseholds had access to these f a c i l i t i e sas a part of the sanitation programme. Tlie 1nforroat10o tlierein w i l lIndicate theûltiniste potential of having such f a c i l i t i e s through propernu>i ivãtion and te»;lm1cal/financial

Of tlie 478 households covered for the analysis, less than.10% hadii1hft£. toe of the soak p i t «x l garbage p i t » : has ¿been aless than 2%, The «r»|y exception in th is regard has''-been the

bathing platform which was reported toy one-fourth of the households. An1nter-distr1ct coriiparieon shows » wide variation in the use of thesef a c i l i t i e s . Keverthelese, 1t does Indicate t lwt sanitary f a c i l i t i e sotliev tlvto. latri ites hsve so far played a very low-key iôle i n rural

l 1

t 5 i

IP. Mater Avai labi l i ty ! Of tin? 111 $cl«x>l latrines completed, R7(78%) liad access to water within t l « ecliool comjxxind whereas* In anotl*?r21 (19%) cases water was available 1n cioso proximity. Oily 3% of thesclwois did not have any water source nearby. Handiximp was the nt tJnwater source; 90% of tlx? schools refiorted aocí*::;" to Iwndpufiip Winter, This1e true 1n case of a l l t l » surveyed diet ríete except. for Etawah wliereopen well was as »n 1inportant source *f> lvtndpuinp;'

19. Latrine Usage; Only 58 <'schools reported use of latrines Ijy UK;students and this works out: to a l i t t l e over 50% of tlie units completed.A/iouj the districts1-, Saliaranpur SJKJWS maximum ut i l i sa t ion ; more ttvin $4%of schools reporting latr ine usage. This 1s followeti by Gonda (70%).However, leaving a few schools, t>ie peinentage' of students using tix?latrines aixl urinals 1s very low. Between boy© and g i r l s , tl>e usage rs>\:eamong the lat ter 1s higher.

On an e»x|u1ry as to wly tl-*e latrines are not used, t l « teacherscarne up with a liost of reasons which are presented below:

- lack of motivation- latrine away from tlie scliool Ixi'llditig- poor maintenance- defective construction- no bucket to clean- parents' objection to their wards cleanii g the latrines

i - social stigma- Inadequate water caused by anirnals drinking the stored water- no water source, nearby- defective design (the front ventilators are too large to allow

children play mischief by.tlirowing stones/pebbles at tlieuser).

- lack of I tealth education

20. Maintenance: It Is disheartening to note that 1n nearlytwo-thirds of the schools, tlie latrinee are not maintained at all. Insome districts like Fat:ehjxir aixl ©onda, the situation 1s still wot se.Tlie only exception being Sal«ranpuf\ «diere 95% of tlie sc»*x>l latrines Ivsvebeen fouid out *o be properly maintained. In majority of cases,naintenance Is done by the students.

Most o f t l i e . •feol'ioole have••••*••&• w a t e r ,f.torag.e t-ank a t t a c h e d t olatr ine. In some t'cUxil© britehyfiM-owir-tU k:k:;. lytve lx>en provided tofac i l i ta te cleaning.

21. Environment 1n the campus? In ri»ore tlvan 86% cases, theenviro-M'ient nrftMn the school camjx*s looked clean; tlie a l l y exceptionbeing Fatehpur wliere less than one-third of tlie schools could boast of aclean surrounding. Spi l l ing of waste paper aixl garbage could be seen In10% of tlie schools. Water logging within tlie cont(xx<nd seene to be quite

»)' .with b*1f of t l » ec»«o1e covered fw tlie .preeertt analyeic.

SUGGESTIONS;

??• Sanitary Facilities among Households.-

22.1 In order lo Improve tl» quality of construction and maintainuniformity 1n certain minimum standards, Inmediate steps should Ix?taken to Issue detailed guidelines covet'ing all tie aspects ofconstruction.

22.2 It 1s worth calling a day's orientation of ll« functionariesInvolved 1n Hie .construction process to share the findings of tliespot survey aiKÍ discuss the guidelinesthread-bear,

32.3 Supervision of latrines under construction should be strengthenedso that things can be rectified on tlie spot, If necessary, tiresupervising officials should be given tin* required orientation to

, carry out effective supervision. For this purpose, 1t 1sadvisable to give them a check-! 1st which can be filled up atdifferent stages of construction.

22.4 Selection of the beneficiaries -should be based on their felt needsand should not have any link:? with their socio-economic status.

22.5. Involvement of the beneficiaries 1n both selection andImplementation 1s a must.' Such Involvement would also call fortheir participation, 1n cash or kind oi1 both, towards theconstruction of latrines and sanitary facilities.

22.6 The time lag between the'construction of latrine upto the plinthlevel and the superstructure;''should be, reduced. The beneficiariesneed constant persuation to construct superstructure on theirown. The sanitation . motiva tors could do this task with therequired counselling from the. officers visiting the field.

22..7 That convenience 1s only'one advantage of having one's own latrineand that 1t has several advantages pertaining to one's familyhealth should be made known-to the beneficiaries to not 1 vate themfor using the latrines on a regular basis.. This calls for havingan Intensive, campaign on health education using tl« variouschannels available. It 1s necessary to workout a detailedstrategy for this purpose. .The State'. Sanitation Cell should takeup this aspect on priority basis.

??.ft -The focus of motivating "households to have otlwr sanitaryfacilities like smokeless' chulha, lathing cubicles, soakage andgarbage pit, etc. should start with atleast those wl» are havingtheir own latrine. The aim at the Initial stage should be tosaturate these households with â total package of all sanitaryfacilities. In son» area® like Saharanpur district where thepeople seem to be very receptive, starting of some innovativeschemes could te thought of, like declaring a village or a groupof villages as "Smokeless Village".

mm.

23, Sanitary Fácil Ules 1n Schools»

23.1 Willie selccl Ing # $chool for the sanitation prograriíue, besideswater, avai labi l i ty of a COÍII/XX/IK) wall or art least a fence shouldte 1ns'tett<í (i|**t. This 1$ to avoid any f«tb11c nuisance which Is

I Ir* latrine 1s away from i I»? SOIXXJI and tl*íre le1- no. Also lh1e w11T proltxjt th(.< w^ter tw»k attachet/ to

tlw latrine froio the etray catt le wl» otUírwlse use 1t «s a cattletrough causing water scarcity for pi-ojjer use and maintenance ofthe latr ine.

23.2 The size of tlx? front vwitHator of the latrine should Iw retfucetlto avoid I*KI1 sanee tlvit a user student- 1s subjected to.

23.3 Tl>e teaching staff of tlte schools should be given projx^rorientation not only to understand tlie objectives of a sclxx>lsanitation i royrainrne aixi various sanitation tliernes Ixit also tl>efuetl ocJs of corifi*«i1cat1no the same to the children and community asa part of the fiot 1 vat lona 1 process. They should also be equippedwith the necessary educational aids and tl>e materials forpurpose. In thte connection a syllabus on tlte healtlVhygeducation for different classes develoixxl by tlie Voluntary HealthAssociation of 'India could b# tr ied.

?3.4 Reaching the conniunity tívotígh the parents l>y conductiiigmeeting could be thought of. Besides some Important11k© t l« Gs»xlli1 Jayanti Day, ChUdrens' Day, Independence Day,Dtwali, Idd, coiild be used to f ave a Safal Campaign in the villagethrough the school children which w i l l also attract' publicsupport, Involvement of the local Institutions w i l l be an addedadvantage,

UTTAR PRADESH

(RURAL SANITATION)

SIAD DISTRICTS

CiTCRA DISTRICTS

ANNPgjRE - I

DEPARTieiT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ. U.P,

SANITATION PR06RAWE

SPOT SURVEY OF HOUSEHOLD SANITARY FACILITIES

1. V m * y e , ?• Block 3. Diet. 4. Sta

5. Ni<iio of family head., , . 6. Nimifx».r of family members.

7. Serial Mo. of latrine ( t f any)

8. Date latrine ct pieted] . . Upto plinth Ieve1__(ncnth #\d year/ 3 . . Superstructure

9. OuaHty of construction! Good C 3? Fair [ ] j 6ad [ ] .

10. Type of Supei^tructure . . Prick [ ]. . Kutclta [ 3 Specify type '

11. Condition of Superstructure; Good [ ); Fair [ ]; Bad C*

12. foteter souix;e fo»% liousetioid: Inside cotupound - Yes [ ] f No [ ]Oj«n Well [ ] Ha/KljxHitp [ ]Piped Water [ 5 Pond [ jOtlwrs [ ]

13. Nearest water source (less than 10 metres) Yes [ J ; No [ ]-from latrine p i t :

14. Latrine used |jy Men [ ] Cftildren [ ]

Wbrnen [ ] None C ]

15. CaxHtion of l a t r i ne , 1f used: Clean. [ ] ; Fair f 1 ; D i r ty [ ]

16. . I f d i r t y , what steps-owner w i l l take for tetter maintenance?18. Any other sanitary fac i l i t ies Sctokelese Cfiull>a [ ]

Pit [ ]Platform [ ]pit [ ]

19. Additional'Re/i»i»rks:'

& 0es1gnat1at of Interviewer: Date:

ANNEXURE - I IDEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT1 RAJ. U.P.

SANITATION PROORA>*€

SPOT SURVEY OF SCHOOL LATRINES

1. Name o f Pr i i iMiy Schools ^__

?. VM lage : 3. Block; 4 . D1sts _; 5. State»

6. Serial No. of latrine ( i f any)i . .,

7. NutJjer of Pupils: Morning Shift .. Boys GirlsAfternoon Shi ft .. Boys Girls

n, Quality of Construction! GtKxi [ ] ; Fair [ 3> Bad [ ]

9, Witter fcxx.irce for- Soliooit Ins Ule CtofujxxMxf - Yes [ ] ; No [ ]Open Well [ 3 Hantlpufiip t JPiped Water C ] f*ond [ JOtliers t ]

10. Nearest water e.ac«x;e (less tlvsn 10 nit.)] Yes*. C ] ; No [ ]from latr ine ]

11. Usage of latrine (fromjârs Latf Ine k'íJ

BoysGirls

Maintenance»

12. Wlwn was the latrlix? constructed? (Give .month & Year)

13. Water .storage tank attached to . la t r ine Yes [ J No t ]With water [ ] Empty I j

14. How latr ine maintained? Not Maintained [ ] ; By students C li6y Sweepe*" C 3

15. I f by Sweejjer, who i>avs? . (fte. per month)

16. «u«*Bt provided: Yes [ J; C:90iÜ1-: By

17. Binjsh/btxjorn provided: Yes C l i No t ] . By Whorii__

(a) I f not maintained properly, state wly(b) Wl^t n'l&tl'Kxl Is $uygested for 1fnproyefne»-*t?

19 , School. Comtxiurxl; C1e>*t\ C ]Waste i>»per mvi garbage ara.H\d [ ]Stagnant water t 3

20. Atkllftonitl Remarks:

Niiii«? o f I n t e r v i e w e r i . '•'. "... D a t e

SIHo.

1

Information

No. of units reportedlycompleted

Banda

378

Bastí

414

Deui

86

fWUSf-Wtl

i* SultMi-pur

247

lATRlKfS)

to»*- fUu*hfl«rh

60 307

Etdh

312

Fiteh-pur

373

Gondi

144

Sahir-«npup

18»

S1t«-put

314

Tot**

?,82i

2. No.of units surveyed

3 Units actually completedupto plinth level.

4

5

6ood

BricksKutchhí

GoodF*irBad

Open Hell

"Vê» tie)}

PiêJ Niter

85 «I ?S 47 14 (3 34 81 31 42 S7

» 41 23 46 13 61 34 63 31 42 57

g44

49

36

26S

30

7133

17

143

77

14

4411

33

303

10

733

I?

84

4310

3?

334

741

8 74

17

10221

n

137

31

15453

45

432

14272

N.A.N.A.

H kN.A.N.A,

29

It

If3

2121

227

35J

42

42

36i

42

1?391

47

416

14252

139

17

350

30446

10818412

17^37

514?1

%

SINo

9

10

il

lnfor*atIon

Kiter Source less than10 «tres fro* pit (No.)

No. of latrfnes in use

Percentage of latrinesIn use

Very cleanSeasonably cleanDirty

HenNotenChildren

Percentage of households hiother Sanitary facilities;

Smokeless ChuihaSoak P HBathing Plat for»

* * * e lit

1

S3

79.1

74$1

.1S.ÍMÜ)

98.196.1

100.0

37.8-7.9

Bart 1

1?

31

75.6

9717

90.6100.0

90.3

-793

DroH*

7

19

«7.6

897

63.?100.076.9

-34.8

Sultan-pur

4?

39

64.8

435

5U97.351.3

13.0

4.J14.1to.»

ga

84

4$»0

»o

46,

ain-rh

7

11

.6

434

.5

.9

.9

1

ft»w»h

30

49?

to164

66.793.393.3

11.5-

31.11.6

Et*l)

t

77

79.4

619?

100.0100.096.3

--

11.6

Fateh-pur

7

SO

79.4

to40

"

100.0100.0100.0

-1.6

Conda

16

73

74.1

• • '

Í3

95,(too.i78.3

37.3-

80.6

Sahar-«npur

3

4?

100.0

J7s

100,095.?97.6

It.919.1

Sita-put

?

48

84?

19?63

»5<97.983.3

_IS.8

Total

97

373

76.0

13671916

66.391.396.7

9 11.5

77.07.1

AWEXURE - HIM)

SPOT aWVEY OF

District í BANDA (ICDS/DWCRA/WATER)

Household Units - Total

Hex/sel»! d Units Surveyed

Unite-completed upto Plinth level

Quality of Construction

Units with Superstructure

Condition of brick superstructure

Witter source Inside comjxjund

Hater source ait side compound

HOUSEHOLD LATRINES

- Good- Fair- Bad

- Total- Bricks- Kutcha

- Fair- Bctd

- O p m Well

- Open Well- Handpump- Piped Water

Water source less than 10 rnt .from pit

Total No. of latrines 1n use

Cleanliness of latrines 1n Use

Users (based on units)

- Clean- Fair- Dfrty

^ Men- Wornen- children

Othtrr Sanitary Facilities?. ~ Smokeless Chull»- Soakage Pit- Bathing Platform- Garbage Pit

Date t

Njufiibe;

37fl

85

67

64417

493613

9252

-

-

1

53

7451

525253

22

2

20-23 August 1988

I EercentaQe

•

22.5

78.8

8.965.725.4

73.173.526.5

25.069.45.6

-

-

1.5

79.1

13.284.91.9

98.198.1100.0

32.8

2.9

AWBOJRE - 111(11)

SPOT SURVEY OF HOUSEHOLD LATRINES

District : BASTI (UIP/ICDS/DWCR^/EDU)


Household Units Surveyed

Units c wpletecl upto Plinth level


links with Sv ipers truc ture


Water source Inside compound

Water source outside compound

- Good- Fair- Bad


- Good« Fair- Bad

- Open Well- Handpurrip

- Open Well- Handpuiiip

- Piped Water

Water source less than 10 rut.from pit


Cleanliness of latrines 1n use


-•Clean- Fair- Dirty

- Men•- Women

- children

Other Sanitary Facilities - Smokeless Chulha •- Soakage Pit- Bathing Platform- Garbage' Pit

Date i 11

Nufi'il.x?r

414

41

41

10265

30391

9164

21

218

13

31

8212

253128

13

& 13 July 1988

Percentage

' 9.9

100.0

24.463.413.2

73.296.73.3

31.055.313.8

51.2

4.943.9 .

29.3

75.6

25.867.76.5

80.6100.090,3

29.3

>T SURVEY OF

Dist r ic t : DEORIA (UIP/ICOS/DWCRA)

Household Units - Tot*l

Hot rM>\ ti) d I in 11 tí Sui • v< yod

Units completed upto Pl inth level

of Construction


fiontMtion of brick suiters truc tur

Water source - Hâmdpump Inside comjxxmdH / > i i u p ex it. side- corii|>'x.n'W'i

w e l l o u t s i d e cotiij:»«..t/id

GoodFall-Bad

TotalBricksKutcha

GoodFair

r source less tlv»n 10 mt. from pit


Cleanliness of lafrinee; in use


- Clean- Fair- Dirty

- Men.-•Women'

- children

Frtc t i t t i e s - Sxokeless CUillv- 3tw«kaoe Pit- 6iithing Plotforrt- Garbage Pit

ANNDCURF

UVTRINES

Date :

Nuinber

flfi

25

23

7133

17143

77

14R1

7

19

892

121915

- 111(111)

0 March 1988

Percentage

29.0

92.0

30.456.513.1

73.982.417.6

50.050,0

60.934.84.3

30.4

82.6

42.147.410.5

63.2100.078.9

34.8

— I III

ANNEXURE - IIK111)


District : DEORIA (UIP/ICDS/OWCRA)

Household Units - Tot»!

Household Unltts Survive

Units completed upto Plinth level



Condition of brick supers truc ture

- Good- Fair- Bad


- Good- Fair- Bad

Water source - Handpufnp Inside compourtd- HòfKl|X)inj> outside eorujxxjnd- Open well exit side c;otn¡> MÍ "id

Water soL/rce le¿e. tlv*n 10 int. f ro»n pit

Total No. of lat r ines 1n u.£:e

Cleanliness of latrinet-. in use - Clean- Fair- Dirty

- Men- Women- children

Users (based on uni ts)

r Sanitacy Fa^Mit i(7- - Smokeless CI- Soakaye Pit:- Bathing Platform- Garbage Pit-

Date

Number

80

23

7133

17143

77

1481

7

19

89o

121915

; 8 March 1988

Percent H(je

?9,0

92.0

30.456.513.1

73.982.417.6

50.050.0

60.934.84.3

30.4

8?. 6

424710

63100

78

.1.4.5

.0

.9

34.8

District - SULTANPUR



Units completed %ô



level

•- Good

- Fair- Bad


CSondltion of brick surest rue ture -


- Fair- Bad

- Open Well

ter source Gutsido cc- Open'Hb11

Water

pitw e r source less tl«, io s*. f (

Total No. of latrines in use

Cleanliness of latrines 1n use - clean

I

Users (based on units*-)

- Fair- Dirty

- Men

- SoakaoePitPlatformPit

247

47

46

4

411

33303

129

1031

1

42

39

435

203620

62

395

»-10 May 1988

19.2

97.8

8.789.12,2

71.790,99.1

3.?96.8

21.767.3

4.44.42.2

91.3

84.8

10.289.8

51.392.351.3

13.04.3

84.610.9


- Goor J- Fair- Bad


Condition of brick superstructure - Good^ Fair- Bad

Water source - Haixlpuriip Inside compound- Handpump outside cotripound

Water source less than 10 nit. from pit

Tula! No. of latrines 1n use

Cleanliness of latrines In use - Clean- Fair•- Dirty

- Men- Women

Users (tosed on units)

Other Sanitary Facil it ies - Smokeless Chulna- Soak^ge Pit- Bathing Platform

Pit

11

434

51010

ANNEXURE - IHfv)

SPOT SURVEY OF HOUSEHOLD LATRINE3

01str1ct : AZAMSARH (UIP/ICDS/EOU/SIAD) Date : 9-10 March 1988


Household 1*1 Its Surveyed

Units ccnpleted upto Plinth level


60

14

13

733

1284

44

85

•

23.0

92.8

53.823.123.1

92.366.733.3

50.050.0

61.538.5

15.4

84.6

36.427.236.4

45.590.990.9

46.1

ANNCXURE - H I ( v l )

SPOT SURVEY OF

D i s t r i c t : ETAH (UIP/ICDS/SIAD)

Houêlold Units- - Total

Houselwlfl Units Surveyed



Units with Sutlers truc ture

Condition of brick üíupersj truc ture

Water source Inside coiupound

Waiter soiree exits Ide compound

HOUSEHOLD LATRINES

- Good- Fair- 8ad

- Total- Br icks- Kutcto

"Good- Fair- Bad *

- Ojjen W(íll- Handiximp

- Of**! WtOl- Hand|y»iiip- Pipixl Watc;r

Water source less tlvsn 10 rut. from pit.

Total No, of latrines In use

Cleanliness of la trincas In use

Users (based on unite)

- Clean- Fair- Dfrty

- Men- Wçjtíien

- children

Other Sanitary F a c i l i t i e s - Smokeless Chulha- Soakage P i t- Bathing Platform- Garbage P i t

Date :

Numl>CT

31?

34

34

10222

20137

49

•

31

3

8

.. 27

619?

272726

4

2 December 1988

Percent, ayi*

10.9

100.0

29.464.75.9

58.865.035.0

30.869.2

91.2

8.8

23.5

79,4

22.270.47.4

100.0100.096.3

11.8

ANNEXURE - l I K v i D

District : ETAWAH (UIP/ICOS/DWCRA/SIAD)

Household I hi U s - Total

HOUSUIK>1CI Units Surveyed

Units cortipleted upto Plinth level

Quality of nonstruot Ion

Un1 ts wi ti» 3u|)erstrt lot ure

Ca M.H t: I on o f br 1 c k tu i| >ei •::•• V rue: tu i e

Water s<xirce Insltle

Water1 source outside

Wster source lees titan 10 nit, from p i t

Total No. of latr ines In use

HOUSEHOLD LATRINES

AD)

- OVxxl- Fair

- Total- Bricks- KuUilvs

- Fair- Bad

- Handjx«M|>

- Open Well- Handpuwip

Date :

Numlxjr

... 307

63

61

Ft4310

3733

4

834

1

424

171G

10-1? May 1988

Percmtâaa

20.5

96.8

13.170.516.4

58.799.210.8

24.272.7 /3.1

6.639.3

27.926,2,

Clean!Inees of latrines 1n use - Clean- Fair- Dirty

hi-vi 'Ü on i in 11 s)

' • • . • • / !

yr UnitaryPit

- BatMng PlatfoifnPit

30

1010

4

36

191

49.2

33.3•53.313.4

«6.793.393.3

11.5

31.11.6

AWEXURE - I I U v W )J


District i FATEHPUR (UIP/ICO3/3IAD)







W^ter source Inside compound


Water source less than 10 rut.from pit

Total No. of latrine.? in ut>e

Cleanliness of latrines. 1n vise

Users (tosed on(un its)

GoodFairBad

TotalBricksKutcha

GcxxlFairBad

CleanFaii-Dirty

MenWomenchlldcm

Date i

Numbe,

372

81

63

15453

4343:

1427

10

53

2

50

1040

505050

11-13 August 1988

Pereentaqe

21.8

77.8

23.8.71.4'4.8

68.?100.0

32.662.84.6

15.9

84.1

3.2

79.4

20.080.0

1000100.0100.0

ni ¡ v r S.-IM Hv.=ii-y F^, ¡1 it les - Smokelftfis CI*..i 11 - S o t f k a y e P i t- Bathing Platform

Pit1.6

SPOT SURVEY OF

District : GONDA (UIP/ICOS/SIAD)


Houseíiold Units Surveyed

Units completed upto PUnth level






ANNEXURE - III(1K)

HOUSEHOLD LATRINES

- Good- Fair- Bad


- Good- Fair- Bad

- Open Well- Handpuriip

- Open Well- Handpump- Piped Water

Water source less tlvtn 10 rut. fran pit

Total No. of latrines 1n usei

Cleanliness of latrines in use*

iií-.<-pp (bastai <yi u n i t s )


~" C M 1 i di "fcs i

Other Sanitary Facilities. - 3wokele«s Chuil»- Soakage Pit- 6athing Platform

. - Garbage Pit

Date :

Ntmijêr

144

31

31

229

18153

2121

227

?

18

23

23

2??318

10

25

19-21 July 1988

rcri VJC-« I v rj\ n.'

21.5

100.0

6.593.5

58.148.49.7

13,380.06.7

6.587.0

•6.5

58.0

74.2

100,0

95.6100.078.3

32,3

80.6

SPOT SURVEY OF

District : SAHARANPUR (ICOS/SIAD)

Household Unite. - Total


Units completed upt.o Plinth level

Quality of Cot struct .Ion





ANNEXLIRF

HOUSEHOLD LATRINES

- Good- Fair- Bad


- Good- Fair- Bad

- Open Well- Handpuiiip

- Open Well- Handpuiiip- Piped Water

Water source lest tlvin 10 mt . from pit-

Total No. of late ¡net-- 1n use

Cleanliness of latrines in use

U-.-.tv. (l.»üi*t*l (VI Ui-iil-.;.,)

Other Sanitary Facilities - Smokeles- Spakage- Bathing- Garbage


- childfts!

¡s ChulhaPitPlatformPit

Date

Number

189

42

42

357

4242

366

42

3

42

375

4?¿in41

S8

- UUx)

: 30 July 1988

Percentage

22.2

100.0

83.316.7

100.0100.0

85.714.3

100.0

7.1

100.0

88.012.0

100.095.297.6

11,919.1

irvey conducted by Mr D.C. Saxeria, Deputy Director (Pancl>ayat)# Meerut,

SPOT SURVEY OF

District : S1TAPUR (UIP/ICDS/SIAD)




Quality of Construct, lot")


Cavilt1on of brick superstructure

Wnter soiree inside campoutxl

Water source outside GOIIJXXIIXI

ANNEXIJRE -

HOUSEHOLD LATRINES

- Good- Fair- Bad


- Gtxxl- Fair- Bad

- Open Well

- Open Well

Water source less llwi 10 rut. fran pit

Total No, of latrines in use

Cleanliness of latrines'- in use

Users (based on unit*..-)


- Men- Wore**!

OtlK?r Sanitary Facilities - Smokeless Chull*-»- Soakage Pit- Bathing Platform- Garbage Pit

Date : 13-15

Nui «her . Pei

314

57

57

17391

47416

14252

139

17

2

4ft

19263

4147¿0

s

IIICxi)

April 1988

•"Centaqe

18.2

95.0

29.868.41.8

8?.587.212.8

34.161.04.9

1.868.4

?9.8

3.5

84.2

39.654.26.2

85,497. 983,3

15.8

V J ' l . ..<.'.-

S I . I n fo rhõ l I on A ÍÓH- Elah EUwàh Fètel i- flomlà Sàl i i r - S i t a - Tota l

Ho. • \K" I""' anpur ptit

i,

3.

' •

Ho.of unitsreportedlycompleted

No.of unitssurveyeJ.

No.of unllscompleted.

4. No. In use

10 19 ?0 19 19 19 ?5 13»

10 19 16 10 17 19 ?3 114

1 H 16 10 17 19 23 111

? 8 5 4 1? 18 9 56

- Open Well I7 16 5 10 14 IS 15 85

- Open Well- Hõndpump

- Water storage 100.0tank attachedto latrine.

- Water storage -t*nk filledwith water.

- Maintenance ?8.6by students.

• Maintenance -by sweeper.

• Biuth/biooKi «5 7

3

1G0.0

-

31.6

_

?l 1

8?

100

•

12.

6.

6.

0

5

2

2

-

100.0

-

-

-

-3

100.0

11.8

5.9

5.9

1

94.7

73.7

94.7

_

_

-7

95,6

-

13.6

9.1

_

91?

98.?

1? 6

29.7

5.4

11 1

5cl»oul 71.4 66.4 75.0 100.0 8?..? 5 3 78.? 64.9reporting no

-Clean 85 7 94,7 75.0 30.0 100.0 100.0 91,3 86.5- W i i t e Paper

arid garbage 57.1 5.3 25:0 - 8.7 10.0around.

- Stagnant 14.2 - - 50,0 5.9 - 8,7 8.1• i t e r Insidelhe compound

ANNEXURE - IVfD

SPOT SURVEY OF SCHOOL LATRTNES

District : AZAMSARH (UIP/ICOS/EDU/SIAD)

School Units - Total

School Units Surveyed

School Units construction completed

WaterWater source inside school compound (all handpurnps)Water source less •than 10 rot. from pit

Date : 9-10 March 1988

Number

10

10

7

71

Latrine School latrines In use

ScUx>l TotalBoys Git-Is

1. Soys & Girls2. Girls School

Maintenance;

210 ?1106

% using latrInesBoys Girls

7.5

Water storage tank attached to latrines;Water storage tank filled with waterMaintenance by studentsMaintenance by sweeperBucket providedBrush/broom providedNot rua 1n tai tied

School cornjxjund: (Data based on 10 schools)

Clean >Waste paper ami gat-baQe 'around

in c

7

2

665

6*1

Percentage

100.0

70.0

70,010.0

28.6

urinals

42.8

Girls

61.989.6

100.0

28.6

85.785.771.4

85.757.114,2

ANNEXURE -


District : ETAH (UIP/ICOS/SIAO)

School Units * Total

5clx>ol Units Surveyed

Water-

2 December 1988

Percentage

100.0

nten source Inside school compound - Open Well

- Handpurup

Water source outside school compound-Hand ixmip

Latrine Usage: School latrines 1n use

16

3

8

84.2

15.8

42.1

Usaqe

1.

23.4 .5.6,7,8.

Detall^:

School

PawaidehraLai puraSeyapurKl '¿Jittf'i s^f^t *J ¡^

PilkhaniNaglakhariSa.ratpurKandi

TotalRcjyt:'.

14764303819077

20573

Girls

4624151732233042

% us8oy

6.31.16.10.———

13.

Inrs

8375

7

I latrinesGirls

21 .733.320.011 .8——-9.5

% usincfBoys

66.0100.066,778.918.426.04.447.9

urinalsGirls

100.0100.046.758.843.843.5_

23.8

W*ter storage tank attached to latr inesWater wtorage tank f i l l ed with waverMaintenance by students

BI-I l¿.¡ t/t)iv ' .'•Ji:>t, UM intct i

^ b y -i.

Sn ¡..if. ) y ' S i l t s )

19

G

13

:>»:io*i namx>incl: (Data based on 10 schoo ls )

*v*ste i>=i|:x?r am I gari>age around3tay;>.rini w^ver in compound

100.0

31.6

21.121.168.4

94.75.3

ANNEXURE - M i l 1)


District ; ETAWAH (UIP/ICD3/DWCRVSIAD)

School

School

Water

Water

Water

Units - Total

.Units Surveyed

SOL»? -e inside ¡

source outside

school

school

Latrine Usaae; School latr

Usage

1.

2.3.4.5.

Details:

School

SherpurRascolpur

BawarpurAtsu (GS)AJItmai (153)Dakhi1pur

Maintenance-:.

compound - Open Well- Handpump

compound-Open Well-Handpurnp

'1nes 1n

TotalBoys

53

57

125

Girls

70

15310315040

use

Date

Nmnlx- r

20

16

15

82

5

% usinei latrinesBoys t?¡ i

3.5 1

3

-Is

.3

,3

: 10-12 May 1988

Percent^fje

80.0

6.331.2

50.012.5

31.2

% usinn urina It.Boys : (31 r'

75.5 85

100.0 100100100100

Is

.7

.0

.0

.0

.0

Water storage-tank attached to latrinesVteter storage t«nk filled with waterMaintenance by studentsMa in tenant;^ by sweeper-

100.0

peí)-.-pi •-.j

N o t íi

(Data baseei otv 10 «ohools)

Cleanfaux*- fliti.) (jar'ba<je aroundnt waiter in compound

211q

12

124

12.56.26.2

55, 225.075.0

75.0*25.0

AWEXURg -

SPOT SURVEY OF SCHOOL LATglMFS

D i s t r i c t . FATEHPUR (UIP/ICO3/SIAD) r^ te , 11-13 August 1988

Nujuber • Percentage

School Uni ts - Total 1 9

School Units Survey»*! 10 5-5 G

Wüter source Inside school compound - Open Well_ 1-

jgaQg; Sclx3<il l a t r i nes in use

» 1Girls

S<ilKX)l

MJ tnff*vanee:

5030—

100

20502075

to lar»'1nesstorisye tanK fJ l l o t l w i th water

MetIntervance by studentsMaintenance by sweeperBucket proviWoU

10

n JiH-iti

11 -.T4»

. I t - , »n ,n r i, , , I i j t l l

l - i ^ vt;, .1 w - i U r I n CC

10

4

29.411.8

58.8

10

I0

100.0

40.0

urinalsGirls

30.312.145.5

100,0

100.0

30.0

50.0

ANNEXURE - M v )

SPOT SURVEY OF SqjOOL LATRINES

District ¡ GfWnA (UIP/ICtlS/SIAO)

School Unit: ' - Tot * l

School Units Survey» >d

Wa ter

source 1n?.1d<* eoliool compound•- fipen Well

Date t 19-21 July 1988

NyüíLíüT. Percent aye

19

17 69.5

Writer

=~~

1 .?.3.4.5 .6.7.8.9 .10.1 1 .12.

M- tiî ,r*l«-i M M '

source outside echoo

ne_Usaçjei Scliool la t r

School

Ko1l1 Jung!BhagohasKh1r1yaDa11 PurwaMlshrollyaBalU purMaghaipurKal1n1yaBairapurKalyanpurLowaveerpurTulsipur

Water stoi aWîer f:toe-aM^1nt f.nanci.»Mîntoiance6^»cKet i>rovB^nrli/bixxxiifiot i:4íi1nta1

- Handpun.

cot<i)xx «xl- l land|T* Hup

•itwe 1n use

Total % usingBoys

e 10125

-102010102030

51010

Gir ls Boys-.

1538 100.0601515

3151510

1 105

30

yrw tank attached to laliîiH-g«- tank fiH«sd with waterby studentsby =?*<*!}>

Ifitidprovided

0*1* base

U r in coi

er

d on 10 schools)

irixxjnd

i

latrinesGirls

42.562.5

4 .38.54 , 34 .38.6

12.82 .14 .24 . 2

14

3

12

17

131

14

17

1

. 82.4

• 17.6

70.6

% usina urinaisBoys Girls

737.5 14

237

i77442

14

100.0-

11.85.9

17.65.0

82.3

100.0

5 . 9

. 0

.9.3. 0.0.4.0.0.6.6.3.0

SPOT SURVEY OF SCHOOL t ATTUNES

D i s t r i c t t SAIIARANPHR

Sctwol III-»Us -School I 111 I t s Survey* *'l

source InsIde scUxil compound - Open Well- Handpump

Water source a i t s i de scliool compc«|M-Ojjen Wall

l a t r i n e Usage.• Sclxx>l l a t r i n e s 1n use

Usage Deta i l s :

Date

nl Wtfrl'*i l l KZ-l

1919

18

1

i 30 July 1988

percent <a<j<?

100.0

100.0

18

cu.fu.Ki. (Data tesed on 10 schools)4 19

Haste garbage aroundwater in

94.7

1 .2.3.4 .5.6.7.8.9.10.11 .12.13.14.151617

School

Baseda

Oaniyali H*.GanorauHTalpurDoy«ilKímkar Kaidum I t 1BeldajunnenAletaPunderBãlâSWã Jsl*MaidhnukjSudlMtkera G

"Mirjéipur N¿)Mli já ixir NoMlyãngi

Water £to»ã<Hater storCM

''.'.Ma1nt.enãrkce

aicki.-t |)ix>v

Tota is •?Boyjs

8075

2322

Jyipur 56 3S3575234524

Jar 285250

apur 5060

ijra 65.1 100.2 115

. 7046

¿e tankye tank

39

233338287340

342945

- 4536

• • ' , & ' : . :

attached tofilled with

by e tudente.by ewe*

lilrtlj|jer

§ usinQBovs

6.93.54.23.53.52.13.52.82.18.4

10.57.07.03.57.0

10.57.04.2

latrinesGirls

3.42.35.84 .7

-3.53 . 53 . 53 . 54 .33 . 84.35.46.59.7

in.»6.54 . 3

latrineswater

181418

-.

10

1

§sys

7.67.05.43.27.62.24 .32.22.7

17.41.15.84.74 .75 . 85 . 85.84.7

»C| ur ina l :Cikk

947394,

5

5,

3.71.85.56.40.93.75.56.44 .6

10.65.59,55.54.67.37.3s.n3.7

,7.7,7

,3

,3

100.0

».;,..,....,,(. , ,.. ',

ANNBOJRE - IV(vH)


District t SITAPUR (UiP/ICfTS/SIAD) Date i 13-15 April 1988

Wuiiiber Percentane

Scliool Uh.lte Survey*' 23 92.0

Writer source Iiuíldrí SÍCIXXÍ! c<»»if)aurw:l - ity>en Well

Water source outside? sclxx>l

: School latrines In use

115

7

9

4.365.3

30.4

39.1

Sclxx>1

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.

KyotiMertipurRetel*

Ssrain MilUrf

1651161306369691509570

6035304?3040

?540

Boys

6.0

15.914.5

3,3

11.933.3

Maintenance;

Wstcr storage tank attached toWater etoraye tank filled with waterMaintenance by ettident© ;Kíiint enanco í -

(>(•( iv lo'i %'

22

32A

18

(Ost* en

pít|x?r

>jj?|f • .f1(f irce. bhsc<lo i l y o»>e clay Ix-fore survey a»vJ r>ot jxjt to use,

urirtalsBoye

90.666.223.079.486.972.513.321.025.6

Girls

100.085.766.795.283.362.560.040.025.0

95.6

13.08.7

17.4

78.3

around

22 4in1ts. 0ne unit

2122

construe

91.38.78.7

t1cn com

Documents

WI- - IRC · chulha, etc. That ... The major objective of this survey was to study the status of latrines ... 1e true 1n case of all tl» surveyed diet ríete except. for Etawah