102
Woodward-Clyde Consultants Pennsylvania 19462 215-825-3000 Fax 215-834-0234 February 14, 1990 88C2076-4M United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 3 841 Chestnut Building Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 Attention: Mr. Randy Sturgeon Remedial Project Manager PROPOSED PHASE ffl GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION DU PONT-NEWPORT SITE NEWPORT, DELAWARE Gentlemen: On behalf of Du Pont, Woodward-Clyde Consultants (WCC) has reviewed EPA's January 17, 1990 preliminary letter requesting additional work to attain additional groundwater data to satisfy sufficiency requirements of EPA for the Newport Site. Du Pont and WCC recognize that letter as an EPA response to the Data Sufficiency Memorandum (WCC, April 27, 1989). For the record, Du Pont and WCC anticipate comments in the near future on the Data Sufficiency Supplement (WCC, November 8, 1989). Du Pont has been responsive to EPA requests and complied with mandated schedules fully since the Site became nominated for NP.L status. Further, Du Pont and WCC have conducted significant investigations prior to an ACO, in response to an AGO, and then a Phase H follow-up investigation at the request of EPA. With respect to the groundwater investigations, which the EPA comment letter addresses, there is sufficient information to conduct a FeasibilityStudy (FS). The alternatives available for groundwater remedy are few, if groundwater cleanup is required. While additional data may be required for the Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA), as part of detailed design data needs, feasibility judgements can be made with existing information. Du Pont and WCC have examined the record of work performed by Du Pont and WCC since the 1970's and are surprised that EPA suggests an additional major field program at this time. A summary of the more recent activities performed to date include: Consulting Engineers, Geolpgists and Environmental Scientists Offices inOther Principal Cities AR308786

semspub.epa.gov · Woodward-Clyde Consultants Pennsylvania 19462 215-825-3000 Fax 215-834-0234 February 14, 1990 88C2076-4M United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 3

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Woodward-Clyde ConsultantsPennsylvania 19462215-825-3000Fax 215-834-0234

February 14, 199088C2076-4M

United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 3841 Chestnut BuildingPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19107

Attention: Mr. Randy SturgeonRemedial Project Manager

PROPOSED PHASE ffl GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATIONDU PONT-NEWPORT SITENEWPORT, DELAWARE

Gentlemen:

On behalf of Du Pont, Woodward-Clyde Consultants (WCC) has reviewed EPA'sJanuary 17, 1990 preliminary letter requesting additional work to attain additionalgroundwater data to satisfy sufficiency requirements of EPA for the Newport Site. Du Pontand WCC recognize that letter as an EPA response to the Data Sufficiency Memorandum(WCC, April 27, 1989). For the record, Du Pont and WCC anticipate comments in the nearfuture on the Data Sufficiency Supplement (WCC, November 8, 1989).

Du Pont has been responsive to EPA requests and complied with mandatedschedules fully since the Site became nominated for NP.L status. Further, Du Pont and WCChave conducted significant investigations prior to an ACO, in response to an AGO, and then aPhase H follow-up investigation at the request of EPA. With respect to the groundwaterinvestigations, which the EPA comment letter addresses, there is sufficient information toconduct a Feasibility Study (FS). The alternatives available for groundwater remedy are few,if groundwater cleanup is required. While additional data may be required for the RemedialDesign/Remedial Action (RD/RA), as part of detailed design data needs, feasibility judgementscan be made with existing information.

Du Pont and WCC have examined the record of work performed by Du Pontand WCC since the 1970's and are surprised that EPA suggests an additional major fieldprogram at this time. A summary of the more recent activities performed to date include:

Consulting Engineers, Geolpgistsand Environmental Scientists

Offices in Other Principal Cities AR308786

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

o March 1987 - Du Pont and WCC prepared and submitted to EPA a report onthe existing prior data. The fundamental groundwater flow patterns at theSite and the parameters of concern were identified.

o September 1987 - Du Pont and WCC submitted the results of the June-August1987 Phase I field investigation which included the installation of 27 wells,surface and downhole geophysical surveys, aquifer tests (7-day) north andsouth of the Christina River, a river sediment survey, and a tidal cycle riverwater study. These reports were provided to EPA and formed a basis for theRI/FS Work Plan (WCC, July 28, 1988) approved by EPA. The results of thisPhase I study have remained largely unchanged to present for the North andSouth Disposal Areas.

o July 1987 - July 1988 - Du Pont and EPA negotiated the AGO at the Site.

o July 1988 - EPA approved the Final RI/FS Work Plan, which included a Phasfor the Remedial Investigation (RI). The work included 7 wells, as wellextensive ecological analyses of the on- and off-site marsh areas and rivers.Phase II fieldwork was completed in 1988 (sampling occurred in November andDecember, 1988).

o April 1989 - Data Sufficiency Memorandum (WCC, April 27, 1989) wassubmitted to EPA in April 1989. Sufficient data were available at this time todetermine the extent of vertical and horizontal contamination, to calculateloadings, to perform a Risk Assessment (RA) for the Site, to conduct a FS, andto develop an RD/RA Plan.

Du Pont and WCC recognize that there never will be 100 percent of datapotentially available at a Site, but, nevertheless, decisions need to be made to move forward.Data are sufficient to progress with the RA and FS process now. If EPA, however, elects to

AR308787

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

-3-

continue the RI, Du Pont and WCC have reviewed in detail the preliminary suggestions of EPAand are providing comments in the following sections.

Du Pont and WCC recognize that some additional information may be requiredfor the RD/RA, and, thus, Du Pont agrees to gathering these data at this time for thateventuality. Du Pont and WCC, however, strongly urge EPA to review and re-evaluate theprodigious data submitted to date, to recognize that options for remedy of groundwater arelimited, and to acknowledge that acquisition of additional data is unlikely to affect conclusionsof the FS. In the event that EPA requires a Phase III Groundwater Investigation at this time tocomplete the RI, Du Pont agrees to conduct the program conceptually outlined in subsequentsections of this letter. Work would begin on the program upon approval of the items identifiedin this letter and subsequent approval by EPA of a detailed Work Plan and schedule.

For convenience, Du Pont and WCC are responding below on an item by itembasis to the six items numbered in the January 17, 1990 EPA letter.

ITEM NO. 1

The nine approximate locations for additional three-well cluster drilling sitesproposed by EPA are shown on Figure 1. For discussion purposes, WCC numbered each ofthese nine locations. As discussed during our meeting of February 5, the EPA-proposed 27wells are excessive and are not warranted either "by regulation" or technical merit. If theEPA feels that additional field investigations are necessary, Du Pont would agree to installwells at locations labeled A through F (see Figure 1) as part of a Phase III investigation,because they could benefit the RA and RD/RA program. These locations will be discussed asappropriate in the following sections. For discussion purposes, Du Pont and WCC are providingsummary figures of measured total concentrations of significant parameters (Figures 2 through13). Further, the data (Tables 1 through 10) and summary figures for the total meanconcentration of each of the parameters are presented in Figures 14 through 16. These figuresprovide the current best estimate of probable total concentration for each parameter of

AR308788

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

concern at each well. These data were provided previously in the Data SufficiencyMemorandum, and are included here, again, for ease of reference.

Proposed EPA Locations 1 and 2: These two proposed locations are located atthe northeast perimeter of the Newport Site. Based on the February 5, 1990 meeting, Du Pontand WCC understand that EPA's purpose for these six wells is to characterize better theextent of any possible groundwater contamination in this area of the Site both on and off theproperty. Because the Newport Site property extends east of James Street and only onepermeable Potomac Formation water-bearing zone is likely to be present in this area (based onboring logs of MW-17B and MW-18B), the six EPA-proposed wells are considered excessive toachieve this goal. Based on the physical boundaries of the historic operations area, which wasbounded by James Street, and the likely groundwater flow directions in both the Columbia andPotomac Formations in this area, Location A (Figure 1) is presented by Du Pont. Du Pontagrees to two wells, one completed in the shallow zone Columbia Formation and one in theintermediate zone Potomac Formation.

Both contaminant concentration gradients and the groundwater flow directiasuggested by the existing data support drilling at the Du Pont recommended location. Thespacing of the isoconcentration contours shown in the Data Sufficiency Memorandum suggestthat non-exceedances of Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) may be demonstrated atLocation A. Chemical data for the groundwater sample from DB-2, a temporary piezometernot designed as a monitoring well, cannot be used for RI evaluation purposes because the dataare unreliable. Furthermore, two closely positioned locations in this area are consideredunnecessary. Because James Street does not represent a hydrogeologic or property boundaryrequiring contaminant concentration data for RA purposes, we see no reason to drill at EPALocation 1 (Figure 1). Instead, the Du Pont Location A is anticipated to provide groundwaterchemistry data reflecting non-exceedances of the ARARs. Du Pont is willing to drill at alocation in this general area.

SR308789 A

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

-5-

No deep zone Potomac Formation well is required at Location A becauseexisting data suggest that only one water-bearing zone in the Potomac Formation is present inthis part of the Site (see MW-17B and MW-18B boring logs).

Proposed EPA Location 3: Our understanding from the February 5, 1990meeting is that EPA requests drilling at this off-site location to obtain better resolution of theouter edge of the contaminant plume suggested by some of the existing monitoring wells alongthe eastern boundary of the Site. Upon close scrutiny of the specific monitoring wellsconstructed along this eastern boundary, however, it is readily apparent that the outer edge ofthe contaminant plume boundary can be estimated in the Potomac Formation without drillingadditional wells. The MCL exceedances reported from any of the groundwater samplingepisodes were for barium only in the Columbia Formation (Figure 4). These exceedancesoccurred in existing monitoring wells MW-16A, MW-18A, MW-14, and MW-7A along thiseastern perimeter. There are no exceedances for any Potomac Formation wells in this area(Figures 2, 3, and 5 through 16). Consequently, in lieu of the EPA's proposed three-well clusterLocation 3, Du Pont agrees to drill a shallow zone Columbia Formation monitoring well atLocation B and two additional shallow zone Columbia Formation monitoring wells at LocationsC and D (see Figure 1). These three Columbia Formation wells would provide better definitionof the barium concentrations in the shallow zone along the eastern perimeter of the Site. Inaddition, due to groundwater flow directions in the Potomac Formation, Du Pont agrees todrill a Potomac Formation well at Location B to supplement the Location A drilling andprovide a downgradient well from MW-17B and the historic operations area of the Site.

A well in the deep zone Potomac Formation, as proposed by EPA, is consideredunnecessary. The bottom of contamination exceeding MCL requirements is restricted to theshallow zone Columbia Formation. Inspection of chemistry of the intermediate zone PotomacFormation (Tables 1 through 10; Figures 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13), which is summarized in Figure15, reveals no exceedances in MW-18B and MW-7B. Further inspection of the deep zonePotomac Formation chemistry (Tables 1 through 10 and Figure 16) also reveals no exceedancesat this location. For RI purposes the bottom of contamination has been adequately definedalong the eastern boundary of the Site.

BR308790

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

Proposed EPA Locations 4 and 5: According to the February 5, 1990discussions, these EPA locations were prompted by exceedances of the 10 ppb cadmium MCLreported for the perimeter monitoring wells MW-11, MW-6A, MW-6B, and MW-6C, andparticularly by the 130 ppb reported at MW-6A. The value of 130 ppb is a statistical outlier atthe 90 percent confidence level, in accordance with EPA procedures for identifying outliers(Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities, Interim FinalGuidelines, EPA, February 1989). Based on the previously submitted groundwater chemistrydata for the two Necastro residential wells located immediately adjacent to the southerncorner of the Newport Site, which showed no MCL exceedances, Du Pont and WCC concludethat no additional monitoring wells are needed in this area of the Site.

The only parameter for which any MCL exceedances have been reported forany of the five monitoring wells in this area of the Site is cadmium. The figures submitted aspart of the Data Sufficiency Memorandum displayed only the highest reported total ordissolved parameter concentrations from any of the sampling events. As shown in theattached Figures 6 and 7, the exceedance of the 10 ppb MCL for cadmium occurred in the tPotomac Formation wells MW-6B and MW-6C (Figure 16) only during the initial sampliepisode in August 1987. The calculated means of measured concentration do not exceed 10ppb (Figures 15 and 16). The initial slight exceedances (12 ppb at MW-6B and 17 ppb atMW-6C) were followed by several sampling episodes in which cadmium was not detected (lessthan 5 ppb). These initial 12 ppb and 17 ppb concentrations are considered anomalous dataassociated with initial sampling following construction of the monitoring wells. Thus,additional monitoring wells in the intermediate and deep zone Potomac Formation in thisvicinity are not warranted.

With regard to the cadmium exceedances in the shallow zone wells, MW-6A,MW-11, and MW-13, all but one reported concentration are within a few parts per billion ofthe cadmium MCL. The one exception is the reported 130 ppb total cadmium for MW-6Aduring the December 1988 sampling episode. As stated previously, the measured concentrationis a statistical outlier (at the 90 percent confidence level) and should not be used for anevaluation of whether additional wells would be required. Furthermore, dissolved cadmium

flR3Q879l

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

-7-

was reported as a non-detection for MW-6A during the same sampling episode. Thus, thecadmium exceedances in the Columbia Formation at this perimeter location are consideredextremely marginal. This is consistent with the non-exceedances from the immediatelyadjacent off-site Necastro residential wells along Old Airport Road. Combined with theprobable direction of Columbia Formation groundwater flow toward the wetlands on theDu Pont property in this area, rather than an off-site direction, the Du Pont property boundaryalong Old Airport Road is considered coincident with the approximate edge of the shallowgroundwater plume containing any MCL exceedances. Additional Columbia Formationmonitoring wells, therefore, are not warranted in this vicinity of the Site perimeter. Thesouthern boundary of the groundwater plume can be estimated horizontally and vertically withthe existing data.

Proposed EPA Location 6: This three-well cluster location is requested byEPA south of the Christina River. Minor exceedances of the cadmium MCL in both wellsMW-19A and MW-19B, as well as minor concentrations of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) andtrichloroethylene (TCE) in the shallow zone well MW-19A are understood to be the basis forthis proposed EPA cluster of three wells. The PCE and TCE identified in the shallow zone atMW-19A are not considered to be related to the Site. The probable source of thesecontaminants is to the south. (Refer to Data Sufficiency Memorandum on direction of shallowzone groundwater flow.) These available shallow zone piezometric surface data suggest thatthe probable shallow Columbia Formation groundwater flow direction is toward the wetlandson the Du Pont property in this area. The lack of MCL exceedances in any of the ColumbiaFormation private wells along Old Airport Road also support the contention that groundwatercontaminants associated with past operations at the Newport Site have not influenced theColumbia Formation groundwater quality in the private wells along Old Airport Road.

The levels of cadmium and TCE concentrations in monitoring well MW-19Aare so low that no additional Columbia Formation groundwater chemistry area are considerednecessary for the RA or the FS, or to estimate the edge of contamination. Data are sufficientto define concentration gradients in the area; thus, these data would be used to define theouter edge of the cadmium and TCE concentrations. The existing groundwater chemistry data

8R308792

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

for the Columbia Formation in this vicinity of the Site are, therefore, considered sufficient.No additional Columbia Formation monitoring wells are considered necessary by Du Pont andWCC for this area.

The cadmium exceedance of the MCL in the Potomac Formation at theMW-19B well location can also be addressed without drilling additional wells. The two sampleswere collected shortly after installation of the well. The reported values may be an artifactof perturbations due to drilling. Moreover, there are no MCL exceedances in the PotomacFormation private wells along Old Airport Road and the existing potentiometric surface datafor the Potomac Formation suggest a southeastward or eastward flow direction from theMW-19B location across the Du Pont property rather than toward the private wells along OldAirport Road. In combination with the minor exceedance of cadmium in MW-19B, noadditional data for the Potomac Formation are considered necessary for preparation of the RAor the FS. Thus, no additional intermediate zone Potomac Formation monitoring wells areconsidered warranted by Du Pont and WCC in this vicinity of the Site.

The nearby deep zone Potomac Formation well DML-7 (Figure 16) defines tbottom of contamination of the Site on the southwestern border. No deep zone well, asproposed by EPA, is warranted.

Proposed EPA Location 7: This EPA three-well cluster location is positionedsouthwest of the Site boundary on the north side of the Christina River. In the PotomacFormation, the only parameter of concern is cadmium, with slight exceedances of the MCL inonly one well, DM-6 (Figures 14 through 16, Tables 1 through 10). The other peripheralmonitoring wells in this area (MW-3B and MW-3C), display no MCL exceedances for anyHazardous Substances List (HSL) parameters (Figures 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, and 16), Inaddition, the groundwater flow direction in the Potomac Formation in this part of the Site issoutheasterly across the Christina River toward other existing Site monitoring wells onDu Pont property. Based on the only slight exceedance of one parameter, the absence ofexceedances in MW-3B and MW-3C, and this flow direction, no additional off-site perimeter

SR308793

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

-9-

monitoring wells in the intermediate and deep zones of the Potomac Formation are warrantedto conduct the RA or the FS. Consequently, no additional Potomac Formation monitoringwells are necessary.

Existing periphery shallow zone monitoring wells near the EPA Location 7show MCL exceedances for zinc, cadmium, TCE, and PCE. Although the groundwater flowdirections in this area are toward the Christina River, rather than off-site, Du Pont agrees toinstall one shallow zone Columbia Formation monitoring well (Location E) near EPA Location7 to delineate further the edge of the plume.

Proposed EPA Location 8: Based on the February 5, 1990 meeting, EPAselected this three-well location to evaluate in more detail the source of the PCE and TCEconcentrations in the area of existing monitoring wells MW-1A and SM-2. Du Pont and WCCconsider these concentrations associated with groundwater flow directions driven by pumpageof WW-13 and WW-11 along with natural flow under non-pumping conditions. The organicssource was the historical operations, documented in the Data Sufficiency Supplement, locatedto the northeast of these wells, not the area of the Holly Run Plant. Thus, no additionalmonitoring wells are considered necessary or warranted in the vicinity of EPA Location 8.

Proposed EPA Locations 9: This EPA three-well cluster location is positionedoff-site to the northwest beyond the railroad tracks. By virtue of its position upgradient fromany historical operations at the Newport Site it is considered a background location. Theindicator parameters of the Site (barium, cadmium, and zinc) that have been identified in wellsWW-11 and WW-13 from the intermediate zone Potomac Formation might be elevated abovethe natural background levels of the area. Thus, these concentrations would likely be due topumping activities, as previously described (Data Sufficiency Supplement, November 1989).Because of potential surface sources of contamination upgradient of the Site, e.g., the railroadtracks, Du Pont agrees to install a shallow zone Columbia Formation well in the vicinity ofLocation F. However, two additional Potomac Formation wells are considered unnecessary.

AR3087914

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

ITEM NO. 2

Groundwater chemistry data trend analyses over time were conducted by WCCand the pertinent aspects are addressed in the preceding section. Graphs showing trends ofparameters reported prior to 1987 to present are attached (Appendix A). Tables 1 through 10and Figures 2 through 13 provide time data since 1987. Inspection of these graphs reveals thatfor many of the wells there is a decrease in concentration over time of one or moreparameters since installation of the wells.

To provide additional confirmation, Du Pont agrees to collect and analyzesamples from all pertinent periphery wells installed during Phases I and II, followinginstallation of the additional agreed to Phase III wells.

ITEM NO. 3

The background groundwater chemistry issue is addressed in the Item No,section under Location 9. Specific delineation of background chemistry will be providedEPA with the results of the Phase III Groundwater Investigation.

ITEM NO. 4

On the basis of comparison between the existing groundwater chemistry datafor the Newport Site and the MCLs or other ARARs, no other HSL parameters (besides barium,cadmium, zinc, TCE, and PCE) are considered likely to pose a groundwater risk. One possibleexception might be arsenic, due to the DB-2 groundwater data. As discussed previously,however, these data are not considered useable to represent the actual groundwater chemistryat the test boring location. For discussion purposes, data on arsenic were summarized for thisletter report (Figures 2, 3, and 14 through 16; Tables 1 and 2). However, additional data to becollected during the Phase HI of the RI work will be necessary before inclusion of arsenic, orother chemicals, and the final selection of risk chemicals, is made. For RI purposes, there areno other indicator chemicals.

flR308795

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

-11-

ITEM NO. 5

Contemporaneous hydrographs for the Christina River and water elevations ofnumerous Site monitoring wells representative of both the Columbia and Potomac Formationsduring several tidal cycles were previously submitted to EPA in the Work Plan (WCC, July 28,1988). Evaluation of these hydrographs will be discussed with the results of the Phase IIIGroundwater Investigation and in the RI report. No additional continuous water levelmeasurements of the Christina River or any Site monitoring wells is warranted.

As discussed during the meeting of February 5, the data present in the DataSufficiency Memorandum on heads at low and high stages of the tide show that vertical-gradient directions are unaffected by tide stage. Further, as has been shown numerous times,mean tidal-stage head measurement provides the basis for loading calculations, flow rates anddirections. Mean tide measurements will be used in the RI Report.

ITEM NO. 6

As discussed on February 5, 1990, the PCE and TCE concentrations at MW-1Aand SM-2 might suggest contaminant transport directions different from groundwater flowdirections. However, as explained above, historical supply well pumpage accounts for this.

The other area at the Newport Site where isoconcentration plots might suggestcontaminant movement in a direction different than apparent groundwater flow is in theColumbia Formation near monitoring wells SM-4 and MW-8 on opposing sides of the ChristinaRiver. Scrutiny of the previously submitted stratigraphy data shows that the Christina Riveris incised only about half-way through the approximately 25-foot thickness of the ColumbiaFormation at the Site. In conjunction with the available water level elevation data for themonitoring wells and the Christina River, the potential exists whereby groundwater in theColumbia Formation might flow under the Christina River from the SM-4 area to the MW-8area. This would possibly offer an alternate explanation for the similarity of the shallow zoneColumbia Formation groundwater in the two areas of the Site.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

As discussed above, Du Pont and WCC do not feel that additional RI work isneeded to perform the RA or FS. However, in a spirit of cooperation, Du Pont agrees toconduct the Phase III efforts described in this letter. Following receipt of written commentsfrom EPA on the Data Sufficiency Supplement and approval by EPA of this conceptualPhase III groundwater program, Du Pont will initiate preparation of a Phase III RI Work Planaddressing all additional non-wetlands investigations.

Please do not hesitate to call the undersigned or Mr. Tim Hill at Du Pont ifyou have any questions.

Very truly yours,

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS

Roger T. Gresh, P.G.Project Manager

Alfred M. Hirsch, Ph.D.Vice President

RTG/kcs/WM-44Sencl.

cc: S. Johnson (DNREC)T. Hill (Du Pont)A. Palmer (Du Pont)C. Trmal (Du Pont)

AR308797

Tables

AR308798

TABLE 1(Page 1 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Arsenic, Dissolved Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DH-05 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lOH-05 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

DH-06 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

DHL-07 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

DHU-07 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lDHU-07 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MW-01A 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-01B 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-01C 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHW-01C 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-02A 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < . 10.0 ug/lHW-02A 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-02B 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-02C 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MW-03A 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-03B 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-03B 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-03C 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHU-03C 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HU-04A 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MW-04B 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHU-04B 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-04C 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHW-04C 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

TABLE 1(Page 2 of 3)

DUPONT-NEUPORT SAHPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMU-05A 12/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MU-05B 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HU-06A 08/10/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MU-06B 08/10/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-06C 08/10/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHW-06C 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved 4.6 ug/lHW-06C 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved 5.2 ug/l

MW-07B 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lHW-07B 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/1.7/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HU-08 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-08 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-09 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMU-09 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved 7.8 ug/l

MW-11 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-11 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

HW-13 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-14 12/16/1987 Arsenip, Dissolved 24.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/02/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

KW-16A 11/09/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved 1.3 ug/lMW-16A 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved .8 ug/l

MU-17A 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved 1.0 ug/l

fiR308800

PAGE 1(Page 3 of 3)

OUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

The sample count for this compound is 87

MW-17A 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved 1.0 ug/l

MW-17B 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < 8.0 ug/lMW-17B 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < .8 ug/l

MW-18A 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved 5.8 ug/lHW-18A 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved 25.0 ug/l

MW-18B 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < .8 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < .8 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < .8 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < .8 ug/l

MW-19B 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < .8 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Dissolved < .8 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

SM-02 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

SH-03 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/lSH-05 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

UW-11 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Dissolved < 10.0 ug/l

8R30880I

TABLE 2(Page 1 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Arsenic, Total Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DB-02 09/16/1988 Arsenic, Total 2150.0 ug/l

DM-05 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

DM-06 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

DHL-07 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lDML-07 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

DHU-07 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

HW-01A 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-01A 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-01B 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-01C 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-02B 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

HW-02C 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total . < 10.0 ug/lHW-02C 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

HW-03A 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-03B 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-03B 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-03C 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/L

MU-04A 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Total 22.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Total 34.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Total 22.0 ug/l

MW-048 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-04B 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

. AR3088GE

LTABLE 2

(Page 2 of 3)

DUPOHT-NEWPORT SAHPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-04C 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-04C 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-05B 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

HW-05C 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-06A 08/10/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

HW-06B 08/10/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

HW-06C 08/10/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-06C 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-06C 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total 20.0 ug/l

MW-07B 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-07B 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-08 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lHW-08 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Total 11.0 ug/l

MW-09 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total 27.0 ug/l

MW-11 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-11 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

HW-13 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-14 12/16/1987 Arsenic, Total 35.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/12/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Arsenic; Total < 10.0 ug/l

AR308803

TABLE 2(Page 3 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-16A 11/09/1988 Arsenic, Total 1.9 ug/lHW-16A 12/17/1988 Arsenic, Total 2.2 Ug/l

MW-17A 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Total 1.2 ug/lMW-17A 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Total 1.3 ug/l

MW-17B 09/21/1988 Arsenic, Total < .8 ug/lMW-17B 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Total < 8.0 ug/lMW-17B 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Total < 8.0 ug/l

HW-18A 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Total 13.0 ug/lHW-18A 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Total 25.0 ug/l

MW-18B 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Total < .8 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Total < .8 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Total .8 ug/lHW-19A 12/20/1988 Arsenic, Total .8 ug/l

HW-19B 11/08/1988 Arsenic, Total < .8 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Arsenic, Total < .8 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

SM-02 08/13/1987 Arsenic, Total < • 10.0 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Arsenic, Total < 10.0 ug/l

The sample count for this compound is 91

TABLE 3(Page 1 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Barium, Dissolved Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DM-05 08/13/1987 Barium, Dissolved 83.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 111.0 ug/lOM-05 12/21/1988 Barium, Dissolved 85.0 ug/l

DH-06 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 112.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 78.0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 49.0 ug/lDM-08 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 30.0 ug/l

DHL-07 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 83.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 78.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 101.0 ug/l

DMU-07 08/13/1987 Barium, Dissolved 183.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 172.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 53.0 ug/l

MW-01A 08/13/1987 Barium, Dissolved 123.0 ug/lHW-01A 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 48.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 64.0 ug/l

MW-01B 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 81.0 ug/lMW-01B 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 85.0 ug/lMW-01B 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 35.0 ug/l

HW-01C 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 45.0 ug/lHW-01C 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 40.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 30.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Barium, Dissolved 48.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 48.0 ug/lHW-02A 12/21/1988 Barium, Dissolved 48.0 ug/l

HW-02B 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 43.0 ug/lHW-02B 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 49.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/21/1988 Barium, Dissolved 42.0 ug/l

MW-02C 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 48.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 117.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/21/1988 Barium, Dissolved 140.0 ug/l

MW-03A 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 336.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 88.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 93.0 ug/l

MW-03B 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 17.0 ug/lHW-03B 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 88.0 ug/lMW-03B 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 10.0 ug/l

TABLE 3(Page 2 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

HW-03C 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 26.0 ug/lHW-03C 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 81.0 ug/lHW-03C 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 20.0 ug/l

MW-04A 08/12/1987 Barium, Dissolved 85500.0 ug/lHW-04A 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 106000.0 ug/l

MW-048 08/12/1987 Barium, Dissolved 265.0 ug/lHW-04B 12/16/1987 Barium, Dissolved 106.0 ug/lHW-04B 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 52.0 ug/l

HW-04C 08/12/1987 Barium, Dissolved 287.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/16/1987 Barium, Dissolved 462.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 485.0 ug/l

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 237.0 ug/lMW-05A 12/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 170.0 ug/lMW-05A 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 195.0 Ug/l

HW-05B 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 52.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 32.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 25.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 80.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 21.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 28.0 ug/l

MW-06A 08/10/1987 Barium, Dissolved 188.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 93.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/16/1988 Barium, Dissolved 88.0 ug/l

MW-06B 08/10/1987 Barium, Dissolved 85.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 35.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/16/1988 Barium, Dissolved 11.0 ug/l

MW-06C 08/10/1987 Barium, Dissolved 127.0 ug/lMW-06C 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 29.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 110.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/16/1988 Barium, Dissolved 83.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 18700.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 9420.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 3880.0 ug/l

MW-07B 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 60.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 101.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/16/1988 Barium, Dissolved 20.0 ug/l

TABLE 3(Page 3 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 98.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 53.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/16/1988 Barium, Dissolved 37.0 ug/l

MW-08 08/12/1987 Barium, Dissolved 195.0 ug/lMW-08 12/16/1987 Barium, Dissolved 81.0 ug/lMW-08 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 96.0 ug/l

HW-09 08/13/1987 Barium, Dissolved 134.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 122.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 58.0 ug/l

MW-11 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 190.0 ug/lHW-11 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 57.0 ug/lHW-11 12/16/1988 Barium, Dissolved 50.0 ug/l

HW-13 12/16/1987 Barium, Dissolved 1510.0 ug/lMW-13 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 1140.0 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Barium, Dissolved 42400.0 ug/lMW-14 12/16/1987 Barium, Dissolved 49900.0 ug/lMW-14 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 80900.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/02/1987 Barium, Dissolved 310000.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Barium, Dissolved 150000.0 ug/lMW-15 12/17/1988 Barium, Dissolved 205000.0 ug/l

MW-16A 11/09/1988 Barium, Dissolved 438000.0 ug/lMW-16A 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 321000.0 ug/l

MW-17A 11/08/1988 Barium, Dissolved 16600.0 ug/lMW-17A 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 28000.0 ug/l

MW-17B 11/08/1988 Barium, Dissolved 16.0 ug/lMW-17B 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 26.0 ug/l

MW-18A 11/08/1988 Barium, Dissolved 45200.0 ug/lMW-18A 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 58600.0 ug/l

MW-18B 11/08/1988 Barium, Dissolved 19.0 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 31.0 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Barium, Dissolved 132.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 204.0 ug/l

MW-19B 11/08/1988 Barium, Dissolved 110.0 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Barium, Dissolved 108.0 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 107000.0 ug/l

TABLE 3(Page 4 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

The sample count for this compound is 122

SH-02 08/13/1987 Barium, Dissolved 125.0 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Barium, Dissolved 101.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Barium, Dissolved 250.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 729.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 98.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 303.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 72.0 ug/lSM-04 12/21/1988 Barium. Dissolved 69.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 57.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Barium, Dissolved 59.0 ug/lSM-05 12/20/1988 Barium, Dissolved 54.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Barium, Dissolved 30.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Barium, Dissolved 1120.0 ug/lWW-13 12/21/1988 Barium, Dissolved 38.0 ug/l

"R308808

TABLE 4(Page 1 of 4)

DUPOMT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Barium, Total Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DB-02 09/16/1988 Barium, Total 11500.0 ug/l

DM-05 08/13/1987 Barium, Total 158.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Barium, Total 100.0 ug/lDM-05 12/21/1988 Barium, Total 85.0 ug/l

DM-06 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 124.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Barium, Total 62.0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 49-0 ug/lDM-08 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 115.0 ug/l

DML-07 08/13/1987 Barium, Total 240.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 98.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 324.0 ug/l

DMU-07 08/13/1987 Barium, Total 530.0 ug/lDHU-07 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 2310.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 252.0 ug/l

HW-01A 08/13/1987 Barium, Total 316.0 ug/lHW-01A 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 87.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 128.0 ug/l

MW-01B 08/14/1987 Barium, Total . 76.0 ug/lMW-01B 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 110-0 "9/1MW-01B 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 135.0 ug/l

HW-01C 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 42.0HW-01C 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 64.0 ug/lHW-01C 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 68.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Barium, Total 66.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 61.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/21/1988 Barium, Total 51.0 ug/l

HW-02B 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 58.0 ug/lHW-02B 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 99.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/21/1988 Barium, Total 39.0 ug/l

MW-02C 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 49.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 355.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/21/1988 Barium, Total 138.0 ug/l

HW-03A 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 374.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Barium, Total 336.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 116.0 ug/l

MW-03B 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 18.0 ug/l

flff308809

TABLE 4(Page 2 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

HW-03B 12/18/1987 Barium, Total 135.0 ug/lHW-03B 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 32.0 ug/l

HW-03C 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 32.0 ug/lHW-03C 12/18/1987 Barium, Total 394.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 38.0 ug/l

MW-04A 08/12/1987 Barium, Total 93400.0 ug/lHW-04A 12/16/1987 Barium, Total . 85100.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Barium, Total 94700.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 102000.0 ug/l

HW-04B 08/12/1987 Barium, Total 328.0 ug/lMW-04B 12/16/1987 Barium, Total 404.0 ug/lHW-04B 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 391.0 ug/l

MW-04C 08/12/1987 Barium, Total 522.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/16/1987 Barium, Total 512.0 ug/tHW-04C 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 545.0 ug/l

HW-05A 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 256.0 ug/lMW-05A 12/14/1987 Barium, Total 188.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 215.0 ug/l

MW-05B 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 51.0 ug/lHW-05B 12/14/1987 Barium, Total 242.0 ug/lHW-05B 12/17/1988 Barium. Total 29.0 ug/l

HW-05C 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 50.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/14/1987 Barium, Total 41.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 38.0 ug/l

MW-06A 08/10/1987 Barium, Total 106.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 90.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/16/1988 Barium, Total 101.0 ug/l

MW-06B 08/10/1987 Barium, Total 23.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 55.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/16/1988 Barium, Total 21.0 ug/l

MW-06C 08/10/1987 Barium, Total 212.0 ug/lMW-06C 08/15/1987 Barium, Total 79.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 169.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/16/1988 Barium, Total 63.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 17900.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 9330.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 4970.0 ug/l

TABLE 4(Page 3 of 4)

OUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-07B 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 37.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 185.0 ug/lHW-07B 12/16/1988 Barium, Total 36.0 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 66.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 124.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/16/1988 Barium, Total 100.0 ug/l

HW-08 08/12/1987 Barium, Total 415.0 ug/lHW-08 12/16/1987 Barium, Total 141.0 ug/lHW-08 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 257.0 ug/l

HW-09 08/13/1987 Barium, Total 1340.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 3080.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 9450.0 ug/l

MW-11 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 276.0 ug/lMW-11 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 140.0 ug/lMW-11 12/16/1988 Barium, Total 244.0 ug/l

MW-13 12/16/1987 Barium, Total 1400.0 ug/lHW-13 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 1300.0 ug/l

HW-14 08/12/1987 Barium, Total 59200.0 ug/lHW-14 12/16/1987 Barium, Total 72800.0 ug/lHW-14 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 81300.0 ug/l

HW-15 08/12/1987 Barium, Total 296.0 ug/lHW-15 12/16/1987 Barium, Total 177000.0 ug/lHW-15 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 120000.0 ug/l

MW-16A 11/09/1988 Barium, Total . 336000.0 ug/lMW-16A 12/17/1988 Barium, Total 307000.0 ug/l

HW-17A 11/08/1988 Barium, Total 24600.0 ug/lHW-17A 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 65200.0 ug/l

MW-17B 09/21/1988 Barium, Total 526.0 ug/lMW-17B 11/08/1988 Barium, Total 29.0 ug/lMW-17B 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 44.0 ug/l

MW-18A 11/08/1988 Barium, Total 64000.0 ug/lMW-18A 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 70600.0 ug/l

HW-18B 11/08/1988 Barium, Total 74.0 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 76.0 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Barium, Total 132.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 193.0 ug/l

AR3088II

TABLE 4(Page 4 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

The sample count for this compound is 124

HW-19B 11/08/1988 Barium, Total 110.0 ug/lHW-19B 12/19/1988 Barium, Total 111.0 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Barium, Total 106000.0 ug/l

SM-02 08/13/1987 Barium, Total 143.0 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Barium, Total 119.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Barium, Total 2490.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Barium, Total 2420.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Barium, Total 149.0 ug/lSM-04 12/21/1988 Barium, Total 115.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Barium, Total 265.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Barium, Total 223.0 ug/lSM-05 12/20/1988 Barium, Total 687.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Barium, Total 56.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Barium, Total 1110.0 ug/lWW-13 12/21/1988 Barium, Total 34.0 ug/l

TABLE 5(Page 1 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Cadmium, Dissolved Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DM-05 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 511.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 6.9 ug/lDM-05 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 10.0 ug/l

DM-06 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 13.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 109.0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 120.0 ug/lDM-08 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 127.0 ug/l

DHL-07 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 11400.0 ug/lDML-07 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 6.4 ug/l

DHU-07 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lDHU-07 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 6.6 ug/lDHU-07 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-01A 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-01B 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-01B 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-01C 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved <• 5.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-02A 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

HW-02B 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved , 96.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/15/1987 Cadnium, Dissolved 72.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 98.0 ug/l

HW-02C 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 274.0 ug/lHW-02C 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-03A 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 16.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-03B 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-03B 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-03B 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

3R3088I3

TABLE 5(Page 2 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

HW-03C 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-04A 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-04A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 9.1 ug/l

MW-04B 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 6.2 ug/lMW-04B 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 13.0 ug/lHW-04B 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-04C 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 18.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 26.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 29.0 ug/l

MW-05B 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < • 5.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-06A 08/10/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-06A 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 13.0 ug/l

MW-06B 08/10/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-06B 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-06C 08/10/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-06C 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 10.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 5.8 ug/l

MW-07B 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-078 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

TABLE 5(Page 3 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

HW-07C 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-07C 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

HW-08 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 16.0 ug/lHW-08 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 29.0 ug/lMW-08 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 25.0 ug/l

HW-09 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 16.0 ug/lHW-09 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 46.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 36.0 ug/l

HW-11 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-11 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lHW-11 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-13 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 8.1 ug/lMW-13 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 6.5 ug/lMW-14 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 12.0 ug/lMW-14 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 10.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/02/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 7.0 ug/lHW-15 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

HW-16A 11/09/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 3.5 ug/lHW-16A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-17A 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 3.5 ug/lHW-17A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved . < 5.0 ug/l

HW-17B 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 6200.0 ug/lHW-17B 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 6380.0 ug/l

HW-18A 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 3.5 ug/lHW-18A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-18B 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 3.5 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 19.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 18.0 ug/l

MW-19B 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 29.0 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 27.0 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

AR3088I5

TABLE 5(Page 4 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

The sample count for this compound is 120

SM-02 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 592.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 501.0 ug/lSM-04 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 473.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved 6.9 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lSM-05 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 5.3 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Dissolved < 5.0 ug/lWW-13 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Dissolved 5.3 ug/l

flR3088i6

TABLE 6(Page 1 of 4)

OUPOHT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Cadmium, Total Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DB-02 09/16/1988 ( Cadmium, Total 19.0 ug/l

DM-05 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Total 544.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Total 14.0 ug/lDM-05 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Total 17.0 ug/l

DH-06 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total 16.0 ug/l

DH-08 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 126,0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 116.0 ug/lDM-08 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total 122.0 ug/l

DML-07 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lDML-07 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

DHU-07 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Total 4.6 ug/lDHU-07 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total 15.0 ug/lDHU-07 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-01A 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Total 12.0 ug/lHW-01A 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 5.4 ug/lHW-01A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

HW-01B 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-01B 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-01B 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total 8.6 ' ug/l

HW-01C 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total 50.0 ug/lHW-01C 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lHW-01C 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lHW-02A 12/15/1987 CadmiuM, Total < 5.0 ug/lHW-02A 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-028 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total 81.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 71.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Total 92.0 ug/l

MW-02C 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total 268.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 53.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Total 36.0 ug/l

MW-03A 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total 16.0 ug/lHW-03A 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Total 36.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-03B 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

AR3088I7

TABLE 6(Page 2 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-03B 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-03B 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

HW-03C 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Total 5.4 Ug/lMW-03C 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-04A 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Total 6.7 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total 17.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total 13.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total 12.0 ug/l

HW-04B 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Total 4.5 ug/lMW-04B 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total 13.0 ug/lMW-04B 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

HW-04C 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Total 4.4 ug/lHW-04C 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total 24.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/14/1987 Cadmium, Total 35.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total 36.0 ug/l

HW-05B 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total 5.7 ug/lMW-05B 12/14/1987 Cadmium, Total 6.1 ug/lMW-05B 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/14/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

HW-06A 08/10/1987 Cadmium, Total 8.9 ug/lHW-06A 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lHW-06A 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Total 130.0 ug/l

HW-06B 08/10/1987 Cadmium, Total 12.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-06C 08/10/1987 Cadmium, Total 17.0 ug/lMW-06C 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

, MW-07A 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total 10.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total 11.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total 9.0 ug/l

TABLE 6(Page 3 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

HW-07B 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lHW-07B 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total 5.6 ug/lMW-07C 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

HW-08 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Total 27.0 ug/lHW-08 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total 41.0 ug/lMW-08 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total 31.0 ug/l

MW-09 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Total • 18.0 ug/lHW-09 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total 63.0 ug/lHW-09 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total 169.0 ug/l

HW-11 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total 19.0 ug/lHW-11 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 12-0 ug/lHW-11 12/16/1988 Cadmium, Total 15.0 ug/l

HW-13 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total 12.0 ug/lHW-13 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total 12.0 ug/l

HW-14 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Total ' 15.0 ug/lHW-14 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total 29.0 ug/lHW-14 12/17/1988. Cadmium, Total 13.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/12/1987 Cadmium, Total 26.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Cadmium, Total 16.0 ug/lMW-15 , 12/17/1988 Cadmium, Total , < 5.0 ug/l

MW-16A 11/09/1988 Cadmium, Total < 3.5 ug/lHW-16A 12/17/1988 Cadmiuw, Total < 5.0 ug/l

HW-17A 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Total 5.9 ug/lHW-17A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total 13.0 ug/l

MW-17B 09/21/1988 Cadmium, Total 4570.0 ug/lHW-17B 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Total 6010.0 ug/lHW-17B 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total 5990.0 ug/l

MW-18A 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Total 7.4 ug/lMW-18A 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total 9.1 ug/l

MW-18B 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Total < 3.5 ug/lMW-1SB 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Total 17.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total 14.0 ug/l

#ft3088/9

TABLE 6(Page 4 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-19B 11/08/1988 Cadmium, Total 23.0 ug/lHW-19B 12/19/1988 Cadmium, Total 22.0 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 7.0 ug/l

SH-02 08/13/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lSH-02 12/17/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 640.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Total 525.0 ug/lSM-04 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Total 437.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 16.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Cadmium, Total 10.0 ug/lSM-05 12/20/1988 Cadmium, Total 32.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Cadmium, Total 12.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/lWW-13 12/21/1988 Cadmium, Total < 5.0 ug/l

The sample count for this compound is 125

TABLE 7(Page 1 of 4)

OUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Zinc, Dissolved ' Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DM-05 08/13/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 90000.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 2050.0- ug/lDM-05 12/21/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 2320.0 ug/l

DH-06 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 3050.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 4000.0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 4630.0 ug/lDM-08 12/20/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 4590.0 ug/l

DHL-07 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 35.0 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 9.9 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 26.0 ug/l

DHU-07 08/13/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 140.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 180.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 16.0 ug/l

MW-01A 08/13/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 72.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 88.0 ug/lHW-01A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 56.0 ug/l

MW-01B 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 41.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 121.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/20/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 48.0 ug/l

MW-01C 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 80.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 162.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/20/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 82.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 11.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 157.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/21/1988 Zinc, Dissolved ' < 8.5 ug/l

MW-02B 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 9740.0 ug/lHW-02B 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 8310.0 ug/lHW-02B 12/21/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 10900.0 ug/l

MW-02C 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 25300.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 198.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/21/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 293.0 ug/l

MW-03A 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 533.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 386.0 ug/lMW-03A 12/20/1988 Zinc/-Dissolved 205.0 ug/l

MW-03B 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 59.0 ug/lMW-03B 12/18/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 60.0 ug/lMW-03B 12/20/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 50.0 ug/l

SR30882I

TABLE 7(Page 2 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-03C 08/14/1987 " Zinc, Dissolved 68.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/18/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 83.0 ug/lHW-03C 12/20/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 58.0 ug/l

HW-04A 08/12/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 31.0 ug/lHW-04A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 26.0 ug/l

HW-04B 08/12/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 712.0 ug/lHW-048 12/16/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 777.0 ug/lHW-04B 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 70.0 ug/l

HW-04C 08/12/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 47.0 ug/lHW-04C 12/16/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 158.0 ug/lHW-04C 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 76.0 ug/l

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 38.0 ug/lMW-05A 12/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 405.0 ug/lMW-05A 11/07/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 32.0 ug/lMW-05A 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 38.0 ug/l

MW-05B 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 23.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 24.0 ug/lMW-05B 11/07/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 28.0 ug/lHW-05B 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 53.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 20.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 37.0 ug/lMW-05C 11/07/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 25.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 12.0 ug/l

HW-06A 08/10/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 64.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 44.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/16/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 25.0 ug/l

HW-06B 08/10/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 48.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 8.5 ug/lMW-06B 12/16/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 26.0 ug/l

MW-06C 08/10/1987 Zinc, Dissolved < 20.0 ug/lMW-06C 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 9.5 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved < 20.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/16/1988 Zfnc, Dissolved 27.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 98.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 247.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 157.0 ug/l

MW-07B 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 33.0 ug/l

: SR308822

TABLE 7(Page 3 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-07B 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 54.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/16/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 31.0 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 18.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 5.9 ug/lMW-07C 12/16/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 24.0 ug/l

MW-08 08/12/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 59400.0 ug/lHW-08 12/16/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 38400.0 ug/lMW-08 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 40200.0 ug/l

HW-09 08/13/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 620.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 968.0 ug/lHW-09 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 6280.0 ug/l

MW-11 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 84.0 ug/lMW-11 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 116.0 ug/lHW-11 11/07/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 37.0 ug/lHW-11 12/16/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 28.0 ug/l

HW-13 12/16/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 108.0 ug/lHW-13 11/07/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 33.0 ug/lHW-13 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved < 8.5 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 187.0 ug/lHW-14 12/16/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 95.0 ug/lHW-14 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 42.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/02/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 102.0 ug/lHW-15 , 12/16/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 114.0 ug/lMW-15 12/17/1988 Zinc, Dissolved < 8.5 ug/l

HW-16A 11/09/1988 Zinc, Dissolved < 1.5 ug/lMW-16A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved < 8.5 ug/l

HW-17A 11/08/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 848.0 ug/lHW-17A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 633.0 ug/l

MW-17B 11/08/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 698000.0 ug/lMW-178 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 605000.0 ug/l

HW-18A 11/08/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 78.0 ug/lMW-18A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 45.0 ug/l

MW-18B 11/08/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 30.0 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved < 8.5 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 2290.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 483.0 ug/l

"R308823

TABLE 7(Page 4 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-19B 11/08/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 138.0 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 32.0 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 24.0 ug/l

SM-02 08/13/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 47.0 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 83.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 12200.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 13400.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved . 77400.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 170000.0 ug/lSM-04 12/21/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 148000.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 350.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 431.0 ug/lSM-05 12/20/1988 Zinc, Dissolved 246.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 60.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Zinc, Dissolved 63.0 ug/lWW-13 12/21/1988 Zinc. Dissolved • 158.0 ug/l

The sample count for this compound is 126

30882**

TABLE 8(Page 1 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Zinc, Total Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DB-02 09/16/1988 Zinc, Total 743.0 ug/l

DM-05 08/13/1987 Zinc, Total 99300.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Zinc, Total 1850.0 ug/lDM-05 12/21/1988 Zinc, Total 2150.0 ug/l

DM-06 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 3100.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Zinc, Total . 4670.0 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 4110.0 ug/lDM-08 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total 4020.0 ug/l

DML-07 08/13/1987 Zinc, Total 60.0 ug/lDML-07 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 8.3 ug/lDHL-07 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 14.0 ug/l

DHU-07 08/13/1987 Zinc, Total 79.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 205.0 ug/lOMU-07 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total ' 27.0 ug/l

HW-01A 08/13/1987 Zinc, Total 232.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 62.0 ug/lHW-01A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 73.0 ug/l

HW-01B 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 53.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 65.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total 89.0 ug/l

MW-01C 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 76.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 114.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total • 110.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Zinc, Total 42.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total ' 22.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/21/1988 Zinc, Total 30.0 ug/l

HW-02B 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 8240.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 7910.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/21/1988 Zinc, Total 9700.0 ug/l

MW-02C 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 24000.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 3620.0 ug/lMW-02C 12/21/1988 Zinc, Total 2800.0 ug/l

MW-03A 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 533.0 Ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Zinc, Total 322.0 ug/lHW-03A 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total 185.0 ug/l

HW-03B 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 88.0 ug/l

TABLE 8(Page 2 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-03B 12/18/1987 Zinc, Total 65.0 ug/lHW-03B 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total 34.0 ug/l

MW-03C 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 81.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/18/1987 Zinc, Total 101.0 ug/lHW-03C 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total 47.0 ug/l

MW-04A 08/12/1987 Zinc, Total 99.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Zinc, Total 117.0 ug/lHW-04A 12/16/1987 Zinc, Total 73.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 44.0 ug/l

MW-04B 08/12/1987 Zinc, Total 647.0 ug/lMW-04B 12/16/1987 Zinc, Total 709.0 ug/lHW-04B 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 66.0 ug/l

HW-04C 08/12/1987 Zinc, Total 113.0 ug/lHW-04C 12/16/1987 Zinc. Total 40.0 ug/lHW-04C 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 76.0 ug/l

HW-05A 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 55.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/14/1987 Zinc, Total 33.0 ug/lHW-05A 11/07/1988 .Zinc, Total 22.0 ug/lHW-05A 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 43.0 ug/l

HW-05B 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 81.0 ug/lHW-05B 12/14/1987 Zinc, Total 69.0 ug/lMW-05B 11/07/1988 Zinc, Total 35.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 58.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 43.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/14/1987 Zinc, Total 14.0 ug/lMW-05C 11/07/1988 Zinc, Total ' 54.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 14.0 ug/l

MW-06A 08/10/1987 Zinc, Total 28.0 ug/lHW-06A 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 17.0 ug/lHW-06A 12/16/1988 Zinc, Total < 8.5 ug/l

MW-06B 08/10/1987 Zinc, Total 46.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 71.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/16/1988 Zinc, Total 17.0 ug/l

MW-06C 08/10/1987 Zinc, Total 312.0 ug/lMW-06C 08/15/1987 Zinc,-Total 89.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 52.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/16/1988 Zinc, Total < 8.5 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 554.0 ug/l

1R308826

TABLE 8(Page 3 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAHPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-07A 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 362.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 251.0 ug/l

MW-07B 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 23.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 33.0 ug/lHW-07B * 12/16/1988 Zinc, Total < 8.5 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 48.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 37.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/16/1988 Zinc, Total < 8.5 ug/l

MW-08 08/12/1987 Zinc, Total 99900.0 ug/lHW-08 12/16/1987 Zinc, Total 36000.0 ug/lMW-08 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 40000.0 ug/l

MW-09 08/13/1987 Zinc, Total 679.0 ug/lHW-09 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 1230.0 ug/lHW-09 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 13600.0 ug/l

HW-11 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 130.0 ug/lHW-11 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 50.0 ug/lHW-11 11/07/1988 Zinc, Total 35.0 ug/lMW-11 12/16/1988 Zinc, Total 60.0 ug/l

MW-13 12/16/1987 Zinc, Total 74.0 ug/lMW-13 11/07/1988 Zinc, Total 52.0 . ug/lMW-13 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 43.0 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Zinc, Total 402.0 ug/lMW-14 12/16/1987 Zinc, Total 631.0 ug/lMW-14 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 55.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/12/1987 Zinc, Total 2190.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Zinc, Total 323.0 ug/lMW-15 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 200.0 ug/l

MW-16A 11/09/1988 Zinc, Total 39.0 ug/lMW-16A 12/17/1988 Zinc, Total 111.0 ug/l

HW-17A 11/08/1988 Zinc, Total 1050.0. ug/lMW-17A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 2630.0 ug/l

MW-17B 09/21/1988 Zinc, Total • 282000.0 ug/lMW-17B 11/08/1988 Zinc, Total 680000.0 ug/lMW-17B 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 580000.0 ug/l

MW-18A 11/08/1988 Zinc, Total 631.0 ug/lMW-18A 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 1010.0 ug/l

fiR308827

TABLE 8(Page 4 of 4)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

The sample count for this compound is 130

HW-18B 11/08/1988 Zinc, Total 168.0 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 384.0 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Zinc, Total 2070.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total 777.0 ug/l

MW-198 11/08/1988 Zinc, Total 151.0 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Zinc, Total 137.0 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Zinc, Total 562.0 ug/l

SM-02 08/13/1987 Zinc, Total 68.0 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Zinc, Total 50.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Zinc, Total 14600.0 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Zinc, Total 14400.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Zinc, Total 88900.0 ug/lSM-04 12/18/1987 Zinc, Total 167000.0 ug/lSM-04 12/21/1988 Zinc, Total 134000.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Zinc, Total 566.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Zinc, Total 396.0 ug/lSM-05 12/20/1988 Zinc, Total 769.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Zinc, Total 157.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Zinc, Total 70.0 ug/lWW-13 12/21/1988 Zinc, Total 115.0 ug/l

AR308828

TABLE 9(Page 1 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Tetrachloroethylene Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DM-05 08/13/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 151.0 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

DM-06 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

DM-08 08/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 42.6 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 15.4 ug/l

DML-07 08/13/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lDML-07 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

DMU-07 08/13/1987 Tetrachloroethylene , 83.4 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-01A 08/13/1987 .Tetrachloroethylene 720.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 410.0 ug/l

HW-01B 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-01B 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 5.3 ug/l

MW-01C 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 5600.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 2200.0 ug/l

HW-02B 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 8.7 ug/lMW-02B 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 7.7 ug/l

MW-02C 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 8.9 ug/lMW-02C ' 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 610.0 ug/l

HW-03A 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 84.2 ug/lHW-03A 12/18/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 38.9 ug/l

HW-03B 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-03B 12/18/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-03C 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/18/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-04A 08/12/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-04B 08/12/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 196.0 ug/lHW-04B 12/16/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 156.7 ug/l

MW-04C 08/12/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/16/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

AR308829

TABLE 9(Page 2 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-05A 12/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05B 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-05B 12/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-05C 12/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-06A 08/10/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-06A 12/17/1987 Tetrachtoroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-068 08/10/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-06B 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-06C 08/10/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-06C 08/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-07A 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-07B 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-07B 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-07C 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-07C 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-08 08/12/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 13.0 ug/lHW-08 12/16/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 10.4 ug/l

MW-09 08/13/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < . 5.0 ug/l

MW-11 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-11 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-13 12/16/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-14 12/16/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-15 08/12/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-16A 11/09/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-16A 12/19/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

3K308830

TABLE 9(Page 3 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

The sample count for this compound is 89

MW-17A 11/08/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-17A 12/19/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-17B 09/21/1988 Tetrachloroethylene 22.4 ug/lHW-17B 11/08/1988 Tetrachloroethylene 29.0 ug/lHW-17B 12/19/1988 Tetrachloroethylene 25.0 ug/l

MW-18A 11/08/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-18A 12/19/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-18B 11/08/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-188 12/19/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-19A 11/08/1988 Tetrachloroethylene 23.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Tetrachloroethylene 9.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Tetrachloroethylene 9.0 ug/l

MW-19B 11/08/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

SH-01 08/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

SM-02 08/13/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 25.7 ug/lSH-02 12/17/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 20.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 68.5 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 72.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene 387.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Tetrachloroethylene • 800.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Tetrachloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Tetrachloroethylene . < 5.0 ug/l

AR308831

TABLE 10(Page 1 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Trichloroethylene Results between 08/01/87 and 01/01/90

Sample Date Compound Concentration

DM-05 08/13/1987 Trichloroethylene . 12.6 ug/lDM-05 12/18/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

DH-06 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

DH-08 08/15/1987 Trichloroethylene 6.6 ug/lDM-08 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene ( < 5.0 ug/l

DML-07 08/13/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lDML-07 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

DMU-07 08/13/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lDMU-07 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-01A 08/13/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-01A 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene 5.0 ug/l

MW-01B 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-01B 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-01C 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-01C 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-02A 08/13/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-02A 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene 19.0 ug/l

MW-02B 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-02B 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-02C 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-02C . 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-03A 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene 17.9 ug/lMW-03A 12/18/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-03B 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-03B 12/18/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-03C 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-03C 12/18/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-04A 08/12/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-04A 12/16/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-04B 08/12/1987 Trichloroethylene 66.1 ug/lHW-04B 12/16/1987 Trichloroethylene 42.2 ug/l

MW-04C 08/12/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-04C 12/16/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

AR308832

TABLE LO /_(Page 2 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-05A 08/11/1987 Trichloroethytene < 5.0 ug/lMW-05A 12/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05B 08/11/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-05B 12/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-05C 08/11/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-05C 12/14/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-06A 08/10/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-06A 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-06B 08/10/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-06B 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-06C 08/10/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-06C 08/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-06C 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-07A 08/11/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-07A 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-07B 08/11/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-078 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-07C 08/11/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-07C 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-08 08/12/1987 Trichloroethylene 19.5 ug/lMW-08 12/16/1987 Trichloroethylene 23.5 ug/l

MW-09 08/13/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-09 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-11 08/11/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-11 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-13 12/16/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-14 08/12/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-14 12/16/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-15 08/12/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-15 12/16/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-16A 11/09/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-16A 12/19/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

1R308833

TABLE 10(Page 3 of 3)

DUPONT-NEWPORT SAMPLES

Sample Date Compound Concentration

MW-17A 11/08/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-17A 12/19/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-17B 09/21/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-17B 11/08/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-17B 12/19/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-18A 11/08/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lHW-18A 12/19/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

HW-18B 11/08/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-18B 12/19/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

MW-19A 11/08/1988 Trichloroethylene 14.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Trichloroethylene 11.0 ug/lMW-19A 12/20/1988 Trichloroethylene 10.0 ug/l

HW-19B 11/08/1988 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/lMW-19B 12/19/1988 Trichloroethylene " < 5.0 ug/l

SM-01 08/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

SM-02 08/13/1987 Trichloroethylene 28.1 ug/lSM-02 12/17/1987 Trichloroethylene 26.0 ug/l

SM-03 08/14/1987 Trichloroethylene 6.2 ug/lSM-03 12/18/1987 Trichloroethylene 7.0 ug/l

SM-04 08/15/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

SM-05 08/15/1987 Trichloroethylene 311.0 ug/lSM-05 12/15/1987 Trichloroethylene 570.0 ug/l

WW-11 12/18/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

WW-13 08/11/1987 Trichloroethylene < 5.0 ug/l

The sample count for this compound is . 89

Figures

•' '•'riC*: . • . • •. . •"-'" ' ' • ' .. .• -

AR308835

> "+

F1

o uja. z3Q

. =O< F

< QZ

3 ceQ a.

oQ

Jl"i

% °<JAMES STREET

AMES STREET

II

-"—

~2t-

l§•J" K

*.a

^

"h-<0:3:0 <

DuPONT - NEW

NEWPORT,

DEL

w|

SULTAN1

jnm«ntaJ Sclw

2 -SO £0^

ODWARD-CLYDE

Itlng Engtnaars,

Geologists

<

O gfc j

®

b0

RATIONS

f uZ 2W OO NZ

GROUNDWATER CO

ROM THE

SHALLOW

Q bUCH S« DgH«

U <C£ CO

IoS&

yQ

O

f-x

Si? :

L•*I cr- 1-§ •°?i**'lO <

^l5

FIGURE 4

M 1 1 ft.Q-.

"5

1

i I1i'• \- •*•^J

JAMES STREET

IT - NEWPORT

SITE

/PORT, DELAWARE

<i 5.O UJ

Q

W SH |3 1

)-CLYDE CONSULT/

•a. Geologists

and Environmental

,

t— 1 S

S*• J O»

fce,So ?o|0 S& s

®

bOco2

WATER CONCENTRATIO,

E SHALLOW

ZONE

Q X•z. EHDO SK OO OSbQ

W SE^ 3OS HC SC- QW <« O

jj g

«- eo

tn ut

1Kl

V

<lns No. 80760200

1

§

6z

1

O —

OJ -C* ccg a1-T ———

^

a:

o1z

1

0i-:a:*iXI•a

5

u.

"

18

JAMES STREET

DuPONT -

NEWPORT

SITE

NEWPORT,

DELAWARE

w|3 (/)

ODWARD-CLYDE CONSULT/

Unj Engtnawa.

Geolojlsti and

EnvIronmuntoJ

£2^3O

bOCO2 U

GROUNDHATER CONCENTRATIO

FROM THE INTERMEDIATE ZON

Q£gK H0. QU <K 0

P<§

85

|Dra«Ing No. 80760200

31oi0dZ1

\\Xk.

f-Wc:D ,U (H CU, .

S

>'o«

6h1o:w,J3

||

Q

"4LL.

-,§

- O

|!

I- <or SO <B- —I

O UJ0.2

w

bOco2O

UOS

o :_Q =-' **o spi

2Id WO EH2 <O wU QW

C6 s

11 Ililli: KI*I

JAMES STREET

< 05 U

lic/iUi- <ceSo <§uJ5aZ .'iHOdM3N

- INOcJna

ll3 Ssi» 1rn czl8I1

OODWARD-CL

suiting Engineers,

G«oJc

^ I®

bOCO2 U0 ZEH

§gEH OS2 bU0 ~2 WO Ocj a.rt'

3NOZ3N3iAHJ,aoacnIScLVMQNnOHO

d

W K 2£H U Oa; rt" ,_]o 3 1-1ft EH <U W IOS EH CO

S<§VIgO*3

§1rS a

i <-

§ '3 jn•9 '1 5

°rH ZD.'S-l

U'£c=g-tMb

hl[i- -o

IcS

F1</>£h-<KSO <

NUjQ2 .

'g

DuPONT

NEWP

W2£s%»(-1 o

3NSUL

nvtronmcnt

o.£

-CLYDE

Geologists

cODWARD-

tfog Engineers.

P 3^ So

©VL/

b0CO a2 W |3£ HS^ SSg «EH OS ?2 b 3w -0 ~ gaw §82 1«~ sw fa °EH 2 z<j W W "gs§ 12 XN aO W W sOS 0 EHo os <O M P

Q J Q 3w a; w 3EH O S raos < 2 "O OS U i;0. EH EH zW U 2 flOS EH in |

H •-^H c

w Qos rD _,o •M Q-b

o! oz ~ ejTJ

0"t

I J°11

W W Wc c cO O O•H -H -r-t-P 4J

(0 (014

4J 4J 4Jc c c0) Q) 0)O O O COc c c coo o o enO O O rt

£

^K^0 <n _ iS Ld£Q2 .

'gSiO UJ%zQ

«|^ i5*E-1 5hJ |& 1g{o s°?wp «r2 5f-3 "3

?}

i-1si§i0 S*S

bOCO2OM &J

1-EH S2 Ow BSCJ b28 —M0

OS EH

(.-< rfl W322Q « O2 vj NlID >HO 22 WOS EH EHO W <O H

Q OS QM O WEH 1-3 Sosx 220 uM EH

W OS 2OS EH M

t3,H1

g

»

oz113

iI3

COr>CO

flg«b

1

1

C?

h=o£.s*I|

lp•- o

y

Appendix A

•., . • •. •. .- ;..

'-''- '-':••' . '•"""'••' '; •'-'-. . ••'. ':'•'

'W3 0.8-8 5 2

enco

COO

O

fUCD

— Lrfr— =r-

-r-_

-

r_

p_r-

p

I"-

1I-

—————— F

-I————— L——— r

IJj

——— iv————— E

——— d/

———— E————— L

j.L

——— r^

V^rf

s-—— — ~~fiij

— —— = —

cjS

\ 1

UJ•cH

COCDCDvH

1nn — 1CD jk__j *\

J-4JT*jjIBk *

f t J IPff '

S ^en -*" xa* — s ••k'in tn if) ,_ CD -^ ,<_, _^ _ Ji t i i

„^ A^ V5CO n, TrCD g^ 5•rnh-r ~\C ' J Am JJjl

' CD ^J"» I ^ j

^ ffl M^ ^ P

VMtf/ 1 Ji k1 C*J 1 •-.— . ^^ •

wL_J T ^— n B n ^

n fc'sH j

f l^ FL

T"! ["" ~ 1

1 CD L-JCDvH r~iL JOrv .— -,

CD

o o o o oo o o oo o o oo o o o^r . m cxj «*SR308853

o

_ _ _ 1 - 1 ^

CD ~~"

4-> Och-OQ_ .

Q Z)-MC_CDCD

t

CDCOCD

COCOCD

coCD

COCDH

coCD

CD

CDCD

01

CDCD

o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o

oIZD

-PSL.QO0. I

ro-P

-p och-oCL .zi eQ zi

-rHc_roCD

41 inJZ———————————— ——————— —— —— ———— —— —El—:

CD

m_ CDCDCD

43-

£

O O O0 0 00 . 0 O(D CXI -H

CDCOCD

COCOCD

CDCD

incoCD

5R308855

CDE

COCD

mcoCD

OJCOCD

COCD

OCL ' I I I I I I I I I I T I I ^ w

-J-J

GOO

1

1

-P

C_COCD

__

—— 1——— E

——— |

//

/

-49-^

3 ———V

} ———>

t=T ——

\j\

v,

^

v

/

/

4

<

n<

"

7

\\\\\\\

//( JT\-*-__

f j |/"^

//

s

.

r

CD

CD

COCOCD

COCD

CDCOCD

COCD

mCOCD—TTuI"** *

OJCOCD

I^ *

.— |

COCD

O O O O O Oo o o o o oCD • in ^r m CM ^

CD

O

AR308856

oI-p "f_oCL

CO

Co

f_CD

* . -

GOCOCD

enJZ-pco^ . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ffl-" " " ' ~ CD

COCD

i

S:

r--coen

incoCD

coCD

encoen

OJCOCD

CD

CDCD

OGOCD

O O O Oo o o0 0 00 0 O

en S 2 AR308857

C]

CXJo

c_oCL

CZO

ID

CQ

c_ ,_______,_____,____, ___,ro l i l l l l l l rb^ l l c\j

rt

ooCXJ

COCOCD•<H

COCD

IDCOCD

IDCOCD ^ CQ

1=-P

s|CD ,E

cncoCD

COCD

E

COCD

OCOCD

o

COCL

CO

zro*- 4-J

-P °dODL

C_roCD

# coCOCD

-H-

o o o oo o o oo o o oo o o or m cxj H

coCD

CDCOCD

IDCOCD

COCD

co-poE

m ^co f-cn

CXJCOCD

-H

00CD

ocoCDr-l

Lt

AR308859

"••->vj

o1-PCOc_ UJ

.1

f~~L_ s .(1 1./*•*• f n

— '"™yr \ _JX"

1 J*

-^1—c1^0

c" **i

— — i( ~~j • i '"i* *c_roLTD

cccu

DDDH

——— t

*.

CCc•<;

•3DDT

CCCr

— —- — —

•DDDn

cccc

.

DDDXJ

— i— t

Ccc

— - Tr..^^— ,

DDDH

/

=*

——— f/

=3— y

—— C

//i

J.LU*C N ,.

j— tLSI\v_

,-Sj 0\j.n

ij^ aj>,.•r£M--HT

//

1 II—— 1

T

n

-T-

tV^

Iv/?

Tl/LTo

>

ViV//

i-J—

1—

J

-J—

T-

c

CD-CD _^2 A

COCOCD^ H

jsx.COCDlV""i

CDCDCD^ i

ID JOCD -1-CD ~J_• H ±-O

E..irln - ^ ^>vl ^ ^ ^ B

co ^ HCD "** 1• p"^

1l"""1

COCOCD"V"ri

CXJCOCDrH

^H , —"-

CDXT""1 roco rCD

>~ m3R308860

ino

c_oCL

01

ro

oCL

s:

r— ' I———I———I———I———I———I———t——I———t=—t—=-i———I———I———I———I &L_ I I I I I I riiv t - I I I I I I I E

c_ _m ———— ———— ———— ———————— —£.———— m1~ iizzzzz:zzz:iiizzzz:zzi:z zzzz:zz zzz<cizizz;zzi:zzz coCD —-——-—-—-—-——————-=-—-——— -.- CD

Hf I

4i-CXJ*———————. coCD

O O O O O . OO O O O O ' Or CD ID r m cxj

CDCOCD

COCOCD

COCD

CDCOCD

IDCOCD

COCD

CO

COCD

4-)C_° ICL ' ^ CO

i—i ——————————————————————————— TCD ro

coCL E=

f_

CDro •——i——i——i——i——i——i——i——i——m——i cxj

•$- a-

e

coCOCD

COCD

CDCOCD

IT.CDCD

COCD

O

CDE

m ;rco !"CD

COCD

CO r~"1CD ^

oCOCD

o o oo oCXJ x-i

.flR308862

00

-P :C_ 'OCL

ro

oCL

c_roCD

•~- — - — :

———— E_

Vr — —

-_ •— "

1 — -^ — -^

i4- i

-

•- — "

"™"*

——— E

——— 1=s

<

/"

St

j 1

"~-

—— =fe"•"•- — r

._..r

—J l^

=-9-•\ ii— J//

//*!V

W1>~

I'Y'iNX

/ Sv

/s

Jvs

?T"*"*Cv

I•*&

"V-\y//

yv

j ———

J ———/

>

'v

^

j ———i ———i_ — „,.

CDGOCD%• •" \

COCOCD"|

P***-

GOCDV""l

CDCOCD-rH

,fT,

LD JOco •L-CD "t-TH b:O

E.%|

GO n,01 grH —

• (—— J

1——

mGOCDV""l

CXJ00CD"NT

S cCDV i ro/nr ,—

CD

o o oo oo oCXJ H

308863

COo12:_1 ) r ^"'I1 * '

c_0 1CL^ r-iCD roZ-P0-PI—c

0 „Q_ E

„_T ]

— '"^ — — *

Q-rHE-aroCJ

—— LisJ -^- — ~^— — ~~

_ -*E

d — •

————— — —

" ' "..i—"

. ,L———

— i

-—j —4 —••s.

— t— f

———— 1:

5 -t

~" ».

——— t

——— -1

1 11

11

1

1

1

11

1

1

i l

1

rr

,

^—*.

***'\- —

~s*.

/jS~

Ir-

•• —

K, i— y\\\\

-7

""- _

rx

"Vj.

^*-1

—— E

— fs

>x.--J

J —

1

1 —

^

3= ^_,.*•

-

>

^ —

t- —k -

*^- r•- 1

,"* V^

1 —

CDCO

2 iv i

COGOCDC~~l

l x.

00CDV" 1

CDCOCDT"!

._

ID JOCDCD ±fN ' __O

E

CO Jm ^2 E^ -H

h-cnCOCD

CXJCDCD"H

^__

> ^ •

COCD"*I""I

0COCD

3R3088614

CD

CoQ_

Q

p**"**Io1_J>

11

1 — 1toi,..,.'

h-^

C ——— r

*• '

"'«

,,, „-*

-1—— 1

fc=( 1(U( )

•-"""~

-— •,***

—— "«• —— _

/s.'V

Y1s_/i^

1<TI

i/PIyi

&i

<oo

^ ?

{ y k"

Aj

N^

1/4\

/ / yr

<I>.1^

>

~****

=« ————

,f

f

"™ — ' ——

— - —

^**

_ ,f

m

_^- '

——— •* ——— 4

/Wv1iS

J .

— — . _

- — •

tl...,.,

UJTn

00COCDs*" *

PX ,

COCDx '

CDCOCD^ cnn-p

\ n """co 2CD J=

«^

CDE

^•1" -nn

oo '—CD

cnCOCD

1

CXJCO rCD L

I"**

rL

*<rH00 rCD L

CXJ

-

COo1 .*1 ""~^

4->QC_0 1d—<^ |—«— |

CD COZ-PO-p h-

co ~CL E13 13Q-rHE"DroCJ

ccr

i — i —LT-

DDn

— — -- — — — -F3"~- u__,

X"

^ L-

j - -"~-— **"

— —— _

jS"_x^

X"

— — " —— -^-

- i^ "

——fS'

jS'S'

— =£

ccc

-**"*"*TiT

T ————

I— J~* ^

DDXJ

"t*T

^ *»» ^ « ,

———— E

——— ir_ _x'L J

— Etr— E3 —

r I'~~*s_\

*>s"L**T

- "

t -L —

! i\\

/1 ^17/

( f lJcJ/

1 ———\\\\|V-|v«/1 ——

s.X

D> 1^

-— ^ **»

A^s

\ \

\\\) 1/

t=

CC^

CDCOCD

, t^ '

00COCD

... ,l^ '

px

COCD

t^* *

CDCOCD

t

I F"}

COCD

t"** '

xlCOCD

1""*

cnCOCD•sH

CXJ00CD*— .1^

%;• 1

COCD

DD-H

CO

-pc

CDE

3R308866

*x-|

01s4-> COc_0 1CLS r-iCD roZ4->o-Ph-

co -CL E^ 13Q-ME~OroCJ

ccrD:>u

t

PI— -

. -^

-

Cc'S

* ,'fe

DDH

c —— -=-;

^^

—— I-

=*—— t

H-T

-!

0<i^

/,

-;,/

r <ri— <^

i<i

==k

rrpr°

^

///

s

s

y>

>

>

^

——————

s/"

!>—v-

—sB—i>-1^

\/

i—_—k

c

COCOCD"s-l

r\coCD-*H

CDCOCD• H

IDCOCD^ CO

-C-P

^r cCD °uj crCD sS"sH

CDE

m "^GO !~"CD•<H

CXJ00CDTH

^

> TH

00CDr-i

O00CD• H

D

CXJo!:z

4-> COc_0 1CL^r-HCD roo

c0 -D_ EZJ Z5CZl-rHE"DroCJ

cr

>

Ik — ...i —

fc~— —

M —— ——

~—— _

(

S

<\

,„ I4

^

/

—— E

-We

^•

s

\

?

J ——»

?

^

<

\,

>

i —1 —"••1

~~

" - ^

s*"

— ~-_

<; >

^ •>

--k-s

*£ —

T ——

— — • ..

***~

^

.-•*"*

S

COCOCD AX — 1 ^ ^ 1

COCD

CDCOCD

IDCOCD^ CO

JZ-P

<* cco 2CD sEE.

"s«m ;Hco i—CD

CXJCOCD

CO rCD L

r0CO rCD L-7H

• * • •

D 0 0 0 4^n cu -H ^H

rool-P COc_0 1CL^r-1CD roZ4-Jo-PI—c

o „Q_ ED 13Q-METDroCJ

cnDi

-Sa

*•

Cr•

:>u

L _JM-

™ ——— — .

9

———

&

——— <S

N

/

<r"

^

<

<^

/

^

N

>

/y

^

^

<

— r

c•

>•^^r

\

s

?

">"^

s

^

^

v

s

J — .....

>

. B

»— -— '

—— -£s~£—

>-1

X"

- - — ""

J ——

•^

-

<

— j

/i/

j,

,>

">

rls-

"— -

•M_

"•*ie

~

„ _ >

^

C

COCOCD•<H

rCOCDTH

CDCOCD•c-i

ID00CD^ COn-P^r c~i. nCO gCD •sr-1

CDE

m :Mco |—CD•<H

(MCOCD•-i

'

> ^-iCDCD•<rH

OCOCD•<rH

D

CD

o

-P crc_O ICD-

ro>o

co „Q_ E13 Z5Q-MEIDroCJ

=#

S— _^— - • —

\\\\

—— Hr— '•- X.\!

———— E

*s~\f\yrf==:U —— 1^kO C

3 ————~ — — -^_

I L— *

mf1 t

__— — —

T*J=L-W LLJui\

Ir ky 11

IX I^

j-

±33=/

r

s

Lu

:

/

p l|tiJ

n— y-t —l_i I\\\\1 1T.J//

-ijf-.M

L/^ "

x"*X>

x"X

^r^ I•\ ~

lijfiIII11

) \/

\-fi —

1 ———

H^ !

CD00CD J|T«i l ^ ^

COGOCD^ 1

p x.

00CD"**™n

CDGOCD-H

-

ID JO00CD -v-l o

E^ ^feGO „, HCD ^ P

rH•rni—cn00CD*** 1

CXJ00CD'S — '

•cH00 LCDV 1

[

0oo rCD

o o oo oo oCXJ <cH

8R308870

inoi:z4-> COc_0 1CLS •— lCD ro~Z.4->O

-Ph-C0 .CL EZ5 Z3Q-rHE•oroCJ

c•

I.S .

--v•~

" --"" -

f

^ *-

~ >

-&

^ _~ _

i^

~-- ___" — ~~~-

\

————— Ef

!

————— LL

—————— f

/

————— E

———— \————— E

L

f

J,,,

=**=/ — 's

,/

f

3 ————S

J ————J ———J ————1 ———Si

' •»-_

J-— -\r*= —

3 ————3 ————

j ————*

r ••"••—

• n--"

* • • •

} 0 0 0 Cr m cu -=H

CD00CD•-i

0000CD•<H

rCOCD• H

CDGOCD^ COn-p

^ 0co 1CD >S•-1

CDE

XT £co i—CD••H

mco ,CD- H

CXJGOCDT-l

irH00CD-rH

D

HTH

1IS

4-J :c_0 IdSi-lCD roZ4->0

_pl_co .CL E13 DQ-iHEIDroCJ

c0DD

cc

£=r

«DXI

— — — — "^

""- — •— ,

_^^

T

— -»- -

~ — •—

i

V

*•

^

r

^

^t{

/

r—

— =

c<«;

"v.•N

jt^

^

3 ——

t '

»

s,

^

/

v

^L

*>

3 ——

L —

^_ _"*-

3>-l

"X

S

•^__ .

"X/N•••*

~ rs "

^ ~--

__

i ^

_ _ _<

J — -i ——

C

COCOCD-<H

h-00CD• H

CDCDCD•*-*

ID00CD""* COn-P^r c—1, aoo 2CD SrH

CDE

(T) 'MCO *""CD«<rH

CXJ00CD•*H

•<H00cn>«H

O00CDrH

D

CD

[]

::

SR308872

ro,'*s7""l

1^_i_j ~<r-j— _ *»

c_0 1CLSr-iCD ro—"3* 1x ..... /

o-PI—co „CL EZ) ZJQ-rHEj "1LH*/

roCJ

cu

( _J— — — •"L— i

:>T

.— - — — "

c•

^ — — -~.

3r

—— t—— f. — *

cn

i —— ——. ————

•DQ

Cr

*

:>u

^s

^

/

<

<y<

S.

\

y

———— E<

>

^

———— t

C:

\

^y

/y

y

s

s,

>

>s>

^

f

V

j ——>

f

>

1*~ •_

-1

^

"S

*""*"" J"

//

=td —

c

CDCOCDv"H

GOCDCD^ |

P*x

COCDrH

CDCOCD*rH

j_

ID [0CO CD "^ 0

E1

X

COCD g"^ — •rH

h-cnGOCDV"l

CXJCOCDr-l

~* (—

COCD*x "1 [0co pCD• H

D

oI-P __!

OQd^ iCD

ro-pc oO ,____ _____ _ ____.i——i——i——i——i——i——i——i— i i——i——i——i——i——i co

CD•*H

Q UC•rHM

•EJ-

o o o o o o o oo o o o o o oh>- CD ID ^r m cxj ^

CDGOCD

COCOCD

mcoCD

CXJCOCD

coCD

CDCO01 ^ cnn-Pf~

co pcn >TCDE

COCD

oI4->ZD

OQd

ro

M

^ ICD _

CD

1J-

o o o o ov cn cxj TH

ooOh-°- - - - o,I I I I I r*. I -——~\ I Ia uc

B3^_________10 o

-P 4J _E

a-CD

CD00CD

COGOCD

COCD

COcn ^ cn

JZ

CD

mooCD

CXJooCD

00CD

_

LDO

l1 )

**x *"f- 4£f~—— ' ( '"I,•— —s I..,,.-- •-_!L J

1=1 13: 'CD .Z ro»

i j oC^—11 —0 Q_Z3— f iQ C

•MM

cccDDD

CccDDD

- —— —

CCc

DDD

— U

Ccc

——— 1:

• ———

s— ,

DDD

-1 - — -.

—— — ""

CCc

— ,— — '

"• -

DDD

p —"—-

<£&•

CCc

a'

N

j~Y-PR—

-—

,-j—

=-E

DDD

.

i

-

\\\\r¥-—

f

-=— -

" « ,

i —

•==;

Ccc

1

^

ti<y

•DDD

////

X-4

1-4-

14:

~7t///

=1 —

-p- •

ccc

Efe:

DDD

4

*

-f

-*..

-4

d-

CCC

^

JV\\\=*-4M~ »,

J1-x*j

t -

^

DDD

-

SF

J -— il~PL/j

-T

c

CD

CDTH

COCOCDXL' "1

r**x»COCD-H

CDCOCD' "1

,

ID £QQ ' "i-f~f\ ~l~LJ J _,

I ^^"" -xOf"~*CI^^ j.,Xj]CO rt.CD i™^ *

" p~l

h-m00CDV '1

CXJCOCD'cH

tV"'l

00CD"tTi

OCOCD"H

D

til

GOO

ro L- 'r""""— i— i«n i^•^ __— i

• •• npy I 1

^ roi >

4_J ~Zf"]

C io r~CL

T **— r iQI^^Jc•rHK!

ccccc

3 CD CD 03 au

:> CD CD UD U-1 «;

D CD CD CD ^-i T

D CD Cn cT CH x

D CD CU U0 TH T

— 3*=

D CD C1 0-t C•H

Ly!

Jl~— - -

D CD C0 ^n o

^s/

/f

__."17///////

TTlL~J •|- <K_

lAN

D CD CH "?D Cl

——— E——— E——— E

——— /

1 ^iA\\\

ujs"'

\s>\~r

~-* - ^

. — ——

XjNJX,\— E!,..,..,.., pf

D CD CT rD ^

j

//

1—mu4J-

•i-/fr-

f

DDv.T

l

"~~F]

CCCr

CDCOCD

I^— 1

COCOCD

1"Ti

fx

COCD_ I

CDGOCD^ cn

L

-pf —

1 II ^"~

00 gCD s3^^1^ '

CDE

r ••Hco |—CD*7<«Hx '

cnCOCD•c-l

CXJCDCD

i

H^n |

03CD

DDDn

CD

C]

$8308877

=9-s-l

o __=E^ . . . . . . . . . . .

uj ——— ——— ——— _____—————— ——— ——— ——— ——d

CD- ro-£oCLZ3

M

O OO Oo oo oCXJ • ^i

41

i

1}}

COCOCD

COCD

CDCDCD

IDGOCD ^ CO

JZ-P

5°CD 3

CD

m •'GO !~CD

CXJCOCD

coCD

oCDCD

flR308878

CD

i

•4 -

_ j*

cxj0^ir -*z-COo

°- 1^ '^r-HZro

/ _LJk +j +i"*••" nC1— 'i —0 Q_—3— r iQ"— ' c

-MM

— r 1..

- ,_

t*t

— Is_-- -i— ,

— •• 1

— 2*

^ .

- — -

/44-

'••—

^^

^ ^

—£44--

-

///~ — —

/

- (t

=f-• ^

=*/1—

— L

u

•T/

4~t

1- .

- -

————— ft

-3\4 -//i —

?T —

n J

fcl//

^ ——

iJ —

4

0000CDTH

rCOCD•cH

CD00CD-rH

IDGOCD^ cnn

-p^- cCD °LU r01 -3T

CDE

cn •|HiCO f~~01-cH

CXJCOCDTTH

vH

00 GCD LT-»

coCD

L o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o

3R308879

CD00

OJ '———————————————————-—————. . . . .—————- CDO

-po oo

oCLZ5

M

Q £ *

ro4j^ _________________________j- O I I I I I I I I I I I "1——I———I- I I ^ CD

3

o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o oo o o o o o o oc o h x C D L n ^ r m c x j ^

COCOCD

CO01

^IDCOCD

COcn

mcoCD

cnJZ-p

E

CXJCO01

00CD

O00CD

C]

00

00 ————————————————————————————————— <*O

-pL_Od

CD

r_0

ro

coCL13

O

CJ

•rHM

ft

I

o o oo o oo o oo o ocn • cxi ^H

00CO01

COCD

LD0001 " cn

JZ-pf—

3 iCD 3

CDE

cnooCD

CXJ00CD

00CD

O00CD

CDCO

o

CDzro

oQ_

IXI

D3DDDT

-44

on0ncc

^i.x"

=— y

iiiinu

>

=sj ——Pv 1

//4-

F

i?=•vrSJL— *^N

^jS~

3 ——

"T j^

1 i — 'L_J

HI;

— . —

" — — —^ — ^

— s— p\

— y

ii*i <r1

"X

_— — -^"

-- ^

rClCJucT:

4

$\\u

--

*

N.

33D0H

1 —— 1—'/. J/

=1 —

3—

=1 —

p—J —

•>»."X

:=*

~~2

////

_ — — —

•xH^ j

===1

3 —

/

~— _„ — — — "^

=S—

~- __

__ -. — — — "

4

~— tJ

ccccf?3(

UJV '1

COCOCD' "1

I s *

CO01"1

CD00OlV ' 1

"•x

ID JOCD •CI(J) "^ 0

E.

XJ

CD „-,CD gT~!

*F"i

1—m0001Ti

CXJCO01V i

tv -1 r00 -cnV 1 [o03 rcn

•DDDD03888/

CO

in —————————————————————— OTo , , , , , . , , , , , ,

CD

odCO

ro4->

CL

-r— I

M

13.

5

CDCOCD

CO00CD

00CD

0001

CO_cc

CDE•H

oo01

cnoo01

CXJ03 CDCD W

00CD

o o o o o o o o oo c n c D c n c x j i D o o ^ ' ^ ro o o c D ^ m ^ c n o o c DCXJ -<rH -<rH TT-I rH -<rH

c_od , L._..,_...________,_______, J.

-po

sCD ' ' ' '""'- ro-£oCL

-i—iM

o oo oo oCXJ H

GOCOCD

CDOl

CDCO01

IDCOCD

CD01 E

CDE

cn •'co i-cn

CXJ00CD-H

COCD

O00CD

3R308883

C]

CXJo1

. CO

'-p '

°c9-S

z£"°°^°°2CJ

CDh-

c

COm

———— L

///////////////

[j ————

////

ii1ii

iiii

i

iiI1iii

l1/ii

lt

•:

111Ij1I

I11111'

11j1111111111I

_- — •— — ~

*/

^ ^ ~— »•

3 O CT cn c

CD

00CDxH

CDCOOl

ID00Ol**"* CO

JZ-p

CO °01 ,5

CDE

m ;M00 h~CD-r-l

00CD• -1

xH00CD• H

O00CD•*-H

DVJ

mois:00

.) !^ CDo r~n 1— •m^ UJ

i — iVJ-X - ^

— "^r **^*^r*—'

4-J— r~~ f •»M 1f

—.— -~[ ]

( \• t X_»S

f—-\ ' — '1 1 -

f' * ——

CJroc_-pCD

i|

ccDn

—— L

*

////////^^

/////////

CC

/////////

D0

/iii1I//i

iiiliiI1i

iiiIi1III

\ \•

/////////

.

Cr

x"S 1)jjIfj

Dx

CC

UJ ^Hl. ^ Hl- Vhx

00CD

.^ *

CD00CD_ i

^* '

ID03CD^ COH-Pr~~

"xt" ~"GO ^U J v —— * ^__ 1 ^ HB

^ HBn *\ HH

Ecn CO t"CD_™«j"^* '

CXJ00CD

<

^ n|

CD j-CD L

i

roS rCDrH

B fl

0R3Q8885

01o1CO

£'s?Isi!CL °

o°JZCJ-Mc_h-

c0

- ,;-—— • -»«!••*•*•-. .«.

f

——

.. . >d//

\\\\

\\\\\\\\

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

_„. .

&

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

\\\\\\\———— 1

• *

D 1^. U1 -«H

COCO01-H

rCOCDT-l

CDCO01TH

IDCOCD-1 In

JZ-p

^r cS ocn TH

CDE

cn r1co *—01-<r-l

CXJCO01T-H

TT-I00

3 2X I

O0301TrH

n

IX

COo1^ >-""

001 )

r 1L

0 CDOy-c^ CDCD z:.x*" __

^ *\***•— «

1 \ __Vn.-n• | ••••'*' .

__L_._rJ

C CDo Jrr~\ i^^j

°- c.Z3QL J

1 |

JZCJ•iHC_1— /

////////I

*

/////////f

/////{///

/////////

/////////

/////////

/////////

• \l\\\"\////////

03GOCD_ 1^

hx

COCD

.^

CDGO01

t

ID03CD^ cn

JZ-pr —

1" *~*

m °L J 1 f— •-•

01 vS• H

CDE

cn •/""GO r—CD, __,!^

CXJ00CD

,„ i^* '

^ |

03Olt Li^* '

O03Ol

O CO CDm T-I

CD