Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jane Norman
President of PKP, Inc is an internationally recognized consultant on leadershipand improvement who has been an executive at Caterpillar, Inc., ConAgraInc., Conrad Company and OCHIN while focusing on integrating improvementinto the business strategy. With over 30 years of experience, she hasconsulted with leaders and developed improvement professionals inmanufacturing, food, distribution, technology, software and health care intwelve countries. She is the co-owner of both Austin API, Inc. and ProfoundKnowledge Products, Inc. which develop workshops and virtual learningenvironments which support clients and their improvement teams. She is thecreator of the Accelerated Model for Improvement (Ami™) methods,developed from the API Model for Improvement. Ami™ workshop &materials are used worldwide to define and complete improvement projectswithin 100 days. She is a Certified Quality Engineer (CQE) with a BA in NaturalScience from St. Ambrose University in Davenport, Iowa and a MBA fromRollins College in Winter Park, Florida.
Born in Salem, Oregon, Jane grew up in the Midwest as the daughter ofteachers/administrators, attending schools in Missouri, Kentucky, Iowa andFlorida. She has been a chapter officer for the American Society for Quality,and was certified as a Quality Engineer (CQE). She was also an advisor inJunior Achievement. Married to her husband, Cliff, they have five adultdaughters and 6 grandchildren. They currently reside near Austin, Texas. Sheis a member of New England Women and Daughters of the AmericanRevolution. Her hobbies are the study of US & World history, genealogy,performing music, and her grandchildren. Jane is a co-author of the book,Transforming Health Care Leadership: A Systems Guide to Improve PatientCare, Decrease Costs and Improve Population Health.
Jane & Cliff are co-authors of two new books:
Transforming Health Care Leadership: A Systems Guide to Improve Patient Care, Decrease Costs, and Improve Population Health
Patient Safety at a Glance: For Medical Students, Junior Doctors and Nurses
WorkshopUsing Data to Learn About Variation While
Avoiding Traps
Breakout Session for this Afternoon
• Moving data from data bases to information and knowledge for action. – Introduction to Software owned by IHS to produce useful
displays of data –QI Charts.• Explore the use and application of run charts and
control charts in the health care setting. • Appreciate the power and usefulness of using analytic
methods for decision making and improvement.
3
The Bead Company (TBC)A Quality company!
We want you to join our team!
#1World Class
Beads!
Help Wanted: 8 Skilled Employees
Hiring for The Bead Company
• 4 Willing Workers• Educational requirements minimal, some coordination required• Willing to do their best• Job dependent on performance (100 “good beads” per day)
• 2 Inspectors• Must be able to count accurately and write legibly
• 1 Inspector General• Must be able to count, displays management potential and can report the
results loudly to the Recorder and to management• 1 Recorder
• Write legibly, good in addition and division, computer skills helpful
Job Requirements for the Willing Workers
• Must be willing to put forth best efforts
• Continuation of job is dependent on performance (No Green beads!)
• Conform to work standards-100 beads per day – Any color but Green!
7
8
9
Anscombe’s Four Data Sets - How Are the Data Sets Different?
Data Set 1 Data Set 2 Data Set 3 Data Set 4X Y X Y X Y X Y
10.00 8.04 10.00 9.14 10.00 7.46 8.00 6.588.00 6.95 8.00 8.14 8.00 6.77 8.00 5.7613.00 7.58 13.00 8.74 13.00 12.74 8.00 7.719.00 8.81 9.00 8.77 9.00 7.11 8.00 8.8411.00 8.33 11.00 9.26 11.00 7.81 8.00 8.4714.00 9.96 14.00 8.10 14.00 8.84 8.00 7.046.00 7.24 6.00 6.13 6.00 6.08 8.00 5.254.00 4.26 4.00 3.10 4.00 5.39 19.00 12.5012.00 10.84 12.00 9.13 12.00 8.15 8.00 5.567.00 4.82 7.00 7.26 7.00 6.42 8.00 7.915.00 5.68 5.00 4.74 5.00 5.73 8.00 6.89
Average 9.0 7.5 9.0 7.5 9.0 7.5 9.0 7.5
Statistical Summary of the Four Data Sets:Each data set has 11 data points for X and Y.Each data set has the same averages for X and Y.Each data set has The same correlation coefficient for X and Y: r = 0.86Each data set has the same least-squares regression equation: Y = 3.0 + .5X
with r2 = 0.667 and standard error = 1.24.
23-6
10
Scatterplots for Anscombe’s Four Sets of Data
23-7
11
Run Chart - a graphical record of a measure plotted
over time
Unit 1
0102030405060708090
100
date
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
May Ju
n
Jul
Aug Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Change Made
Cyc
le T
ime
(min
.)
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Avg BeforeChange
Avg AfterChange
Cyc
le T
ime
(min
.)
Improvement in Cycle Time
70
35
13
Importance of Time Order Graph Improvement in Cycle
100 Time
0102030405060708090
date
Jan
Feb
Mar Apr
May Ju
n
Jul
Aug Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Change Made
Cyc
le T
ime
(min
.) Unit 2 – same before and after plot
14
Cycle Time Results for Units 1, 2 and 3
70
35
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Avg BeforeChange
Avg AfterChange
Cyc
le T
ime
(min
.)
0102030405060708090
100
date Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun Jul
Aug
Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
Change Made
Cycle
Time
(min.
)
Unit 1
Unit 3
Unit 2
0102030405060708090
100
date Jan
Feb
Mar Ap
r
May Ju
n
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Change Made
Cycle
Tim
e (m
in.)
0102030405060708090
100
date Jan
Feb
Mar Ap
r
May Ju
n
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Change Made
Cycle
Tim
e (m
in.)
Interchange of Two Points…
• Any symmetric function of a set of numbers almost always throws away a large portion of the information in the data…A statistical test is a symmetric function of the data.
• In contrast, interchange of two points in a plot of points may make a big difference in the message that the data are trying to convey for prediction.
15Dr. W. Edwards Deming 7-14-90
Reference: Quality Improvement through Planned Experimentation
Hospital Family of Measures
18
Improvement of Quality
SPC-8-18
Small Multiples Schematic
Subcomponents
1
2
3
4
5
6
Overall
© 2002 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Patient Satisfaction GraphsOverall Satisfaction
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov
Avg
. Com
posi
te S
core
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov
Avg
. Com
posit
e Sco
re
Respect Comfort
• 70
• 75
• 80
• 85
• 90
• 95
• 100
• Jan• Feb• Mar• Apr• May• June• July• Aug• Sept• Oct• Nov
•A
vg. C
ompo
site
Sco
re
© 2002 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Small Multiples:
Overall System and 22 Districts
Good
Average Waiting Times:All Primary Care Clinics in VHA System
Stratification of Data!
DG 5-11
Subgrouping on ADE Rate
System-wide Aggregate ADE Rate
10
12
14
16
18
20
J/05 F M A M J J A S O N D J/06 F M A M J
AD
E/10
00 D
oses
ADE Rate by Day of Week
Common Cause Hospitals Subgrouped in 6 Month Increments
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
M-1
M-2
M-3
T-1
T-2
T-3
W-1
W-2
W-3
H-1
H 2
H-3
F-1
F-2
F-3
S-1
S-2
S-3
U-1
U-2
U-3
AD
Es/1
000
Dos
es
Night Shift?
ADE Rate Subgroupd by ShiftCommon Cause Hospitals by Qtr
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6
AD
E/10
00 D
oses
28
Anscombe’s Four Data Sets - How Are the Data Sets Different?
23-6
Data Set 1 Data Set 2 Data Set 3 Data Set 4X Y X Y X Y X Y
10.00 8.04 10.00 9.14 10.00 7.46 8.00 6.588.00 6.95 8.00 8.14 8.00 6.77 8.00 5.7613.00 7.58 13.00 8.74 13.00 12.74 8.00 7.719.00 8.81 9.00 8.77 9.00 7.11 8.00 8.8411.00 8.33 11.00 9.26 11.00 7.81 8.00 8.4714.00 9.96 14.00 8.10 14.00 8.84 8.00 7.046.00 7.24 6.00 6.13 6.00 6.08 8.00 5.254.00 4.26 4.00 3.10 4.00 5.39 19.00 12.5012.00 10.84 12.00 9.13 12.00 8.15 8.00 5.567.00 4.82 7.00 7.26 7.00 6.42 8.00 7.915.00 5.68 5.00 4.74 5.00 5.73 8.00 6.89
Average 9.0 7.5 9.0 7.5 9.0 7.5 9.0 7.5
Statistical Summary of the Four Data Sets:Each data set has 11 data points for X and Y.Each data set has the same averages for X and Y.Each data set has The same correlation coefficient for X and Y: r = 0.86Each data set has the same least-squares regression equation: Y = 3.0 + .5X
with r2 = 0.667 and standard error = 1.24.
29
Scatterplots for Anscombe’s Four Sets of Data
23-7
Stages of Denial with DataReactions to Challenging Data
1.The data are wrong
2.The data are right, but it’s not a real
problem
3.The data are right, it’s a real problem,
but not my problem
4.The data are right, it’s a real problem,
and it’s my problem, but I don’t need to
do anything about it
5.The data are right, it’s a real problem,
and it’s my problem and I will fix it
System 1; Quick, Intuitive System 2: Slow Analytic