WP 51929.2014 and connected matters

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

W.P. NO.51929/2014

C/W

W.P.NOS.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014,

797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014,

10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014,

13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014,

13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014,

14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014,

17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014,

23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014,

33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014,

34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014,

35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014,

36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014,

37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014,

38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014,

39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014,

41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014,

41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014,

44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014,

46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014,

47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014,

47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014,

49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014,

51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014,

53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014,

2

54358/2014, 54725/2014, 55081/2014, 55082/2014,

55083/2014, 55436/2014, 55671/2014, 56203/2014,

56300/2014, 56350/2014, 56646/2014, 56748/2014,

57076/2014, 57117/2014, 57150/2014, 57605/2014,

57606/2014, 58859/2014, 59794/2014, 60012/2014,

622/2015, 685/2015, 1958/2015, 2462/2015, 4591/2015,

5228/2015, 5664/2015, 6735/2015, 6981/2015, 7248/2015,

7277/2015, 7326/2015, 8277/2015, 8278/2015, 9135/2015,

9278/2015, 9488/2015, 9576/2015, 10923/2015,

11344/2015, 13201/2015, 14944/2015, 17240/2015,

18814/2015, 19213/2015, 20191/2015, 24417/2015,

24418/2015, 28143/2015, 28673/2015, 28676/2015,

28679/2015, 29317/2015, 29541/2015, 30781/2015,

31794/2015, 32423/2015, 33127/2015, 33128/2015,

33131/2015, 33133/2015, 33134/2015, 33137/2015,

35055/2015, 35464/2015, 35465/2015, 35842/2015,

37412/2015, 40838/2015, 44088/2015, 45662/2015,

47015/2015, 47820/2015, 47821/2015, 47822/2015,

47823/2015, 47824/2015, 47825/2015, 47826/2015,

47827/2015, 49842/2015, 49843/2015, 56271/2015,

57432/2015, 57434/2015, 57438/2015, 57439/2015,

57992/2015, 59004/2015, 59486/2015, 59492/2015,

59495/2015, 742/2016, 751/2016, 2392/2016, 2397/2016,

2915/2016, 5417/2016, 5446/2016, 5448/2016, 6717/2016,

6718/2016, 10318/2016, 11295/2016, 11493/2016,

11844/2016, 11846/2016, 12010/2016, 12674/2016,

13637/2016, 14280/2016, 14649/2016, 14650/2016,

15833/2016, 19019/2016, 19020/2016, 23623/2016,

23643/2016, 23656/2016, 24322/2016, 24676/2016,

24919/2016, 25131/2016, 25132/2016, 30680/2016,

33181/2016, 33196/2016, 33279/2016, 33385/2016,

3

34348/2016, 35687/2016, 35851/2016, 36525/2016,

37682/2016, 38430/2016, 38919/2016, 39001/2016,

40151/2016, 40240/2016, 41753/2016, 44127/2016,

44146/2016, 44246/2016, 46319/2016, 47314/2016,

47461/2016, 51143/2016, 51144/2016, 51145/2016,

51147/2016, 51352/2016, 51353/2016, 51355/2016,

51597/2016, 51707/2016, 51730/2016, 51875/2016,

51876/2016, 51877/2016, 51878/2016, 52141/2016,

52142/2016, 52928/2016, 53240/2016, 53525/2016,

53526/2016, 53527/2016, 53670/2016, 54364/2016,

54790/2016, 55126/2016,55667/2016, 55737/2016,

56022/2016, 56023/2016, 56971/2016, 56972/2016,

57149/2016, 57151/2016, 57709/2016, 57937/2016,

58218/2016, 58222/2016, 58734/2016, 59166/2016,

59168/2016, 59317/2016, 59793/2016, 60064/2016,

63172/2016, 63308/2016, 64534/2016, 64705/2016,

65118/2016, 65121/2016, 182/2017, 815/2017, 2066/2017,

3178/2017, 4293/2017, 4400/2017, 4511/2017, 5036/2017,

5037/2017, 5073/2017, 5207/2017, 5208/2017, 5213/2017,

5214/2017, 5218/2017, 5221/2017, 5301/2017, 5593/2017,

5936/2017, 6637/2017, 6998/2017, 6999/2017, 7000/2017,

7001/2017, 10503/2017, 10504/2017, 11782/2017,

12547/2017, 13456/2017, 14238/2017, 14626/2017,

14627/2017, 14628/2017, 14629/2017, 14630/2017,

14631/2017, 14632/2017, 14670/2017, 14868/2017,

15038/2017, 15588/2017, 18427/2017, 21361/2017,

24061/2017, 24065/2017, 24506/2017, 24508/2017,

24509/2017, 25120/2017, 26455/2017, 26456/2017,

26457/2017, 26458/2017, 28359/2017, 30485/2017,

31268/2017, 33191/2017, 35344/2017, 37044/2017,

40596/2017, 42836/2017, 43194/2017,

4

43207/2017, 45953/2017, 46333/2017, 46766/2017,

47823/2017, 47854/2017, 49031/2017, 50540/2017,

53428/2017, 54064/2017, 54863/2017, 55316/2017,

55317/2017, 56035/2017, 3157/2018, 3523/2018,

5448/2018, 8731/2018, 9190/2018, 12221/2018,

12792/2018, 25302/2018, 26667/2018, 27750/2018,

27947/2018, 30106/2018, 38977/2018, 39615/2018,

48266/2018, 53051/2018, 53250/2018, 56686/2018,

2939/2019, 8325/2019, 8329/2019, 12093/2019 15096/2019,

15199/2019, 15531/2019, 15532/2019, 15534/2019,

26852/2019, 50257/2019,

W.P.NOS. 10568/2015, 15003/2013, 14874/2014,

27833/2014, 42498/2014, 45230/2014, 47606/2014,

47607/2014, 58829/2014, 2935/2015, 2936/2015,

2937/2015, 6225/2015, 7038/2015, 7322/2015, 8111/2015,

8112/2015, 19086/2015, 21999/2015, 28675/2015,

34826/2015, 59793/2015, 1876/2016, 8603/2016,

8707/2016, 16505/2016, 20131/2016, 20132/2016,

34947/2016, 35309/2016, 39427/2016, 47965/2016,

51142/2016, 55666/2016, 57150/2016, 57245/2016,

58220/2016, 58223/2016, 58362/2016, 59167/2016,

59169/2016, 61955/2016, 63205/2016, 2531/2017,

5209/2017, 5212/2017, 37478/2017, 37480/2017 AND

19783/2018 (LA-BDA)

IN W.P.NO.51929/2014: BETWEEN:

SRI. K.P.ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS S/O. LATE K. PUTTAIAH R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,

5

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O.T.V.KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.22, NEW BEL ROAD, I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-95

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING

BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-D. IN W.P.NO.42063/2012: BETWEEN: 1. K.G.G. NAYAR S/O SRI GOPALA PILLAI

6

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT 4TH BLOCK, SHIVARAMAKARANTHNAGAR POST, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077 2. M P MUNIRAJU S/O SRI M. PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO 8, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SHAMMANNA GOWDA LAYOUT, SARASWATHIPURA, ULSOOR, BANGALORE 560 008 3. NAGARAJU H L S/O SRI LINGAIAH H.B. AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO 660, 4TH MAIN, NEAR MADHU BAR BUILDING, PIPELINE, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE 560 050 4. N ASHOKARAJU S/O SRI N LAKSHMANARAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO 2, 3RD MAIN ROAD, JALADARSHINI LAYOUT, NEW BEL ROAD, BANGALORE 560 094 5. K V RAMESH S/O SRI K S VENKATASUBBAIAH AGEDA BOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.114, GELLI APARTMENT, 47TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR 8TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 082 6. KOTHANDARAMA R S/O SRI R.S.RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.129, JEWELLERS' STREET,

BANGALORE 560 001 7. T KALAISELVAN S/O SRI G THANGAVELU

7

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO 102, 3RD CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BYATARAYANAPURA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE 560 026 8. ASHWATHANARAYANACHAR S/O SRI VEERABHADRACHAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO 101, 3RD A MAIN, SOMESHWARANAGAR, C.B. SANDRA, GKVK POST, BANGALORE 560 065 9. M V NARASIMHAPRASAD S/O M N VASUDEVA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO 314, 12TH A MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALROE 560 010 10. C SREEDHARAN S/O SRI N RARUKUTTI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT NO G 1, GROUND FLOOR, OM SAI, S V CROWN APARTMENTS, NO 183, A3, 6TH G CROSS, KAGGADASAPURA, C V RAMAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560 093 11. B L RAMAMURTHY S/O SRI B N LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO M 65, MARKET ROAD, 7TH CROSS ROAD, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA, NAGAPPA BLOCK, BANGALORE 560 021 12. MANOHARAN K S/O SRI K KANDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO 81, I CROSS, 4TH MAIN, PADMANABHANAGAR, BANGALORE 560 070

13. NARAYANASETTY S/O SRI LAKSHMASETTY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO 73, 18TH MAIN,

8

AICOBOONAGAR, BTM I STAGE, BANGALORE 560 068 14. N SHANKARACHAR S/O SRI NANJUNDACHAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO 530/3, 13TH A CROSS, 11TH A MAIN ROAD, SECTOR A, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE 560 064 15. L RAMESH S/O SRI LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.455, 8TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040 16. SMT DEEPTI M SHAH W/O SRI SYED MAQSOOD SHAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.D3, 801, BDA FLAT, AUSTIN TOWN LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 047 17. CHANDRARAO S S/O SRI SUBBARO B AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A NO.120, 1ST CROSS ROAD, GORAKAMANTHANAPALYA, BYRASANDRA MAIN ROAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BANGALORE-560 075 18. S.V. SUNDARARAJAN S/O SRI S VISWANATHAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A NO.8/13, 4TH D CROSS, MADIWALA EXTENSION, MARUTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 068

19. P.K. DESHPANDE S/O SRI K DESHPANDE AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A NO.393, 6TH MAIN,

9

3RD BLOCK, BEL LAYOUT, VIDHYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE-560 097

20. SANDEEP S S/O SRI SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NO.E-49/3, DRDO TOWNSHIP, C.V. RAMAN NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 083

21. B.R. MURALIDHAR S/O SRI V RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.395, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR MILK COLONY POST, NEAR VIVEKANANDA COLLEGE, BANGALORE-560 055

22. G. SEENASWAMY S/O SRI GUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO.87, SRI MANJUNATHA NILAYA, 14TH CROSS, ULLAL ROAD, MUNESHWARA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 056

23. RAMESHA M.R. S/O SRI M RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.51/43, 22 MAIN ROAD, III CROSS, BTS GARAGE BACKSIDE VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040

24. SRIDHAR K C

S/O SRI K.V. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/A NO.20, I MAIN, VAISHNAVI LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 097

25. SMT. RATHI POONACHA W/O SRI K.K. POONACHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO. 69, 'ANUGRAHA',

10

2ND CROSS, 10TH MAIN, BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032

26. C.S. NARAYANASWAMY S/O SRI C.R. SHIVALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO.55, GREEN FIELDS-III, DODDAKALLASANDRA, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD,

BANGALORE-560 062

27. C M JOYAPPA S/O SRI MEDAPPA C N AGEDA BOUT 59 YEARS, M. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD. MAHADEVAPURA, WHITEFIELD ROAD BANGALORE-48

28. K RAMANNA S/O SRI KAATAPPA

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO 868, 2ND E MAIN ROAD, RAMAIAH LAYOUT, KACHARAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE 560 084 29. L GOPINATHAN S/O SRI LAKSHMINARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO 30, SUSHMA NIVAS, APPA RAO LAYOUT, 2ND MAIN, I CROSS, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR, BANGALORE 560016

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. C. G. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K P WEST EXTENSION T CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE 560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISIONER 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT

11

VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001 3. A V RAVIPRAKASH S/O SRI A VENKATARAM AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO 99, 4TH CROSS, I BLOCK, JAYANAGAR EAST, BANGALORE 560 011 4. A V SRIRAM S/O SRI A VENKATARAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO 20, 2ND MAIN, I BLOCK BANASHANKARI 3RD PHASE, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE 560085. …RESPONDENTS (SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR BY B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2; SRI. DEEPAK J, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OR

DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE

NOTIFICATION DATED 3.10.2007 ISSUED BY R2 UNDER ANNX-G.

IN W.P.NO.30494/2013: BETWEEN: 1. S. VENKATESH S/O. SHANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 2. S.RAMESH REDDY S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

3. S.NAGARAJ REDDY S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

12

4. S. SURENDRA REDDY S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHALLAKERE VILALGE, RING ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 043

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P.KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 001 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKARNARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE AND SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. K. A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

ENDROSEMENT DATED 25.2.2013 PRODUCED AT ANN-L.

IN W.P.NO.42671/2013:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. SUBBAMMA W/O. LATE SRI.B.RAMAKRISHNAPPA,

13

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

2. SRI.RAVI KUMAR R S/O. LATE SRI.B.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

BOTH R/A NO.80, JAKKUR VILLAGE AND POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI,

BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. G.R. VENKATESH MURTHY, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S. NISCHAL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-A & B VIZ

PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DT. 3.2.2003 & FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.23.2.04.

IN W.P.NO.638/2014: BETWEEN: S.R. GOVINDAPPA SINCE REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS 1(a). SMT.S.R.GAYATHRI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O. LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA,

14

NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 064

1(b). G.GAURAV AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, S/O.LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA, NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI,

BANGALORE-560 064

1(c). G.GAGAN AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, S/O.LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA, NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. P. SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE AND SRI. H. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 (REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER)

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN REPSECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF SY.NO.58/1 OF SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK VIDE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATIOND ATED 3.2.2013 VIDE ANN-K AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.2.2004 VIDE ANN-L ARE

15

DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013.

IN W.P.NO.797/2014:

BETWEEN:

SRI.N.RAMAIAH S/O. LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD, KAVERI SERVICE STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DT. 5.11.2013 ISSUED BY R-3 VIDE ANNX-G.

16

IN W.P.NO.1089/2014: BETWEEN: MOHAN K.REDDY S/O. LATE B.N.KAMALANABHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A NO.176, GANDHI STREET, KAMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 084

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. PRASAD HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DT. 3.2.2003 ISSUED U/S 17(1) & (3) OF THE BDA ACT 1976 VIDE ANNX-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS LANDS ARE CONCERNED AS THE SAME IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SCHEME OF THE BDA.


SMT.DHANALAKSHMI W/O. VENKATARAMU V AGED 60 YEARS, R/O NO.34, 3RD CROSS, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR,

17

BANGALORE-560 027 ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT.13.1.2012 VIDE ANNX-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT. IN W.P.NO.3389/2014: BETWEEN: MR.JOKIM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O.SRI.ANNAYAPPA, R/A NO.198, CHURCH BLOCK, VISHWANATHANAGENAHALLI, R.T.NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 016

18

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 053. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; BY SRI. A. LOKANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER AS AT ANN-C.

IN W.P.NO.6180/2014: BETWEEN: 1. G.SRINIVAS S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR, (ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045 2. MUNEGOWDA S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR, (ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045 3. SRI. RAMAMURTHY S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR, (ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045. 4. VENKATESH

S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR,

19

(ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE

RESPONDENTS TO RE-DO THE EXERCISE OF DE-NOTIFYING THE

LAND IN SY.NO.81/1 EXTENT 2 ACRES OF PETITIONERS LAND

SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM, HOBLI

BANGALORE EAST TQ. PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION IN WP

NO.15286/06 DT. 20.11.2006.

IN W.P. NO.10356/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

20

R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 064.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SADASHIVAIAH K.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING, DEPT. OF HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE - 560 001. 2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK (WEST) BANGALORE - 560 020. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE REPORT

SUBMITTED BY THE R-3 DATED 29.12.2009 AND ISSUED TO THE

PETITIONER ON 07.12.2013 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

AS PER ANNX-Q.

IN W.P. NO.12014 /2014:

BETWEEN:

SRI. TEJARAM S/O RAMLAL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.10, 2ND STREET

21

1ST CROSS, VENKATESHAPURA MAIN ROAD, PILLANNA GARDEN BANGALORE - 560 045. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. UMESH B.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD

BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

MULTISTORIED BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITHY BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATION DATED 12.12.2005 VIDE ANN-C AND ALSO HIS CASE FOR DELETION OF HIS PROPERTY IN SY. NO.44, PROPERTY NO.44, SITE NO.2, KHATA NO.1150 SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, NOW IN BANGALORE EAST TALUK, MEASURING 75 FT. X 23+27/2, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 1,875 SQ.FT.

ON THE DIRECTIONS OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND HON'BLE SUPREME COURT. IN W.P. NO.12015/2014: BETWEEN: 1. ABDUL MAJEED S/O HASSAIN SAHIB AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

22

R/AT: NO.35, LAL MASJID A STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 051. 2. MUZAMIL PASHA S/O ABDUL MAJEED AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT: NO. 35, LAL MASJID A STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 051. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI.V.SHIVA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MULTISOTIRED BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3; BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


RESPONDENTS TO DELET THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS

FROM ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS WHICH ARE NOTIFIED FOR

THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, I.E., 5 1/2 GUNTAS OF

LAND IN SYNO.42 AND 5 1/2 GUNTAS OF LAND IN SY.NO.43;

6723SQ. FEET OF LAND OF 1ST PETITIONER IN SY. NO.44; AND

6724 SQ. FEET OF LAND OF 2ND PETITIONER IN SY. NO.44; AND

THE ABOVE SAID SY NOS. BELONGING TO THANISANDRA

23

VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK AS

PER ANNX-D.

IN W.P. NO.13043/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. R. RAMACHANDRAN S/O LATE N. RAMAKRISHNA IYER AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 2. SMT. PREMA RAMACHANDRAN W/O R. RAMACHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. BOTH RESIDING AT NO. 1 4TH MAIN IST STAGE MSH LAYOUT, ANANDNAGAR BANGALORE - 560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR

24

SRI.B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-C AND VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED N THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT. IN W.P. NO.13045/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. REKHA BALAKRISHNAN W/O N. BALAKRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 2. SRI. N. BALAKRISHNAN S/O K. NARAYANAN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. BOTH RESIDING AT NO.1 4TH MAIN, IST STAGE ANANDNAGAR BANGALORE - 560 024.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITYM KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.

25

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-C AND D VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE OF 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT. IN W.P. NO.13206/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. SAJAN K CHACKO

S/O K.J. CHACKO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.12, 2ND MAIN ROAD SULTHANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032. REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS ANILA VARGHESE PHILIP W/O SRI. SAJAN K. CHACKO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/A NO.12, 2ND MAIN ROAD SULTHANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR

BANGALORE - 560 032. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING

26

BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-B AND C VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE OF 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT. IN W.P. NO.13207/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. VIJI PHILIP @ VARGHESE PHILIP S/O V.K. PHILIP AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.12 2ND MAIN ROAD, SULTHANPALYA R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032 PRESENTLY WORKING AT: DOHA, QUATAR. REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS ANILA VARGHESE PHILIP D/O SRI. GEORGE PHILIP AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.12

27

2ND MAIN ROAD, SULTHANPALYA R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-B AND C

VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE

KARNATAKA GAZETTE OF 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION

DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE

MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT.

IN W.P. NO.13398/2014:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. MUNI KUPPANNA S/O LATE GINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS.

28

2. CHINNA THAYAPPA S/O LATE GINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS. 3. SRI. CHINNA VENKATAPPA S/O LATE GINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS.

4. SRI. M. MUNIYAPPA S/O SRI MUNI VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.30 SRIRAMPURA OLD VILLAGE JAKKUR POST BANGALORE - 560 0564. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T. YUGANDHIR, ADVOCATE FOR P2 TO P4 SRI. J. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE SMT. PRATHIBHA R.K., ADVOCATE SRI. SANTHOSH S. NAGARALE, ADVOCATE FOR P4) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA KRUPA ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001.

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BDA BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 BDA TO

TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN RESPECT OF PETITIONERS LAND

BEARING SY. NO. 49/4 MEASURING 1.01 AG IN SRIRAMPURA

29

VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE PURSUANT TO THE

FINAL REPORT DATED 30.10.2013 VIDE ANN-F.

IN W.P NO.13774/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. MUNAWAR BURHAN S/O LATE KHADER BURHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO. 206, 19TH CROSS 1ST BLOCK, R T NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI.B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE R2 AND R3)

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAVE NO MANNER OF RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

30

IN W.P. NO.14149/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. N. RAMAIAH S/O LATE SRI. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HENNUR MAIN ROAD NEAR CAUVERY SERVICE STATION KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001

BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS ABANDONED OR LAPSED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DELETE/GIVE UP OR EXCLUDE THE SCHEDULE PROPERLY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC.

31

IN W.P NO.14161/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT. REKHA SHARMA W/O DEEPAK SHARMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 109 ITI LAYOUT, BENSON TOWN, BANGALORE-560 046 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.SRI. R. RAMACHANDRAN S/O LATE N. RAMAKRISHNA IYER AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1 4TH MAIN, IST STAGE MSH LAYOUT, ANANDNAGAR BANGALORE-560 024.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560003 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST

32

PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560 003. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX-B & C VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATKA GAZETE OF 03.02.2003 & FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 & CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT.

IN W.P.NO.14494/ 2014:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. RAJAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, WIFE OF D.M.MUNIKRISHNAPPA

2. SRI. KALLESH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, SON OF D.M.MUNIKRISHNAPPA,

3. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WIFE OF PAPANNA,

4. SMT. KRISHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, WIFE OF CHOWDAPPA,

5. SRI. LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHENNAMMA, ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BENGALURU. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHENNARAYA REDDY S., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,

33

MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS RELATING TO ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS OF PRLIMINARY NOTIFICATION ANNX-T DATED 03.02.2003 FINAL NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNX-AC DATED 23.02.2004 & UNOFFICIAL NOTE DATED 12.11.2013 AT ANNX-D. IN W.P NO.14502/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. ADINARAYANA M S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT # 633 NEAR BALAJI KALYAN MANTAP VMK ROAD, H A FARM POST DASARAHALLI BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING

34

AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BY ITS PRICIPAL SECRETARY M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 4. SRI SUBRAMANI S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 5. SRI KANDAPPA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 6. SRI RAMESH S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 7. SRI LAKSHMANA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 054. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; JAYPEE ASSOCIATES FOR R5-R7 SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF R-4 TO 7 DATED 08.01.2005 VIDE ANNX-P.(II) QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT

35

ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO 7 DATED 31.05.2012 VIDE ANNX-T AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 14521/ 2014: BETWEEN: SRI ANWAR PASHA S/O LATE MUMTAZ HUSSAIN, R/O.THNISANDRA, KRISHNA RAJAPURAM, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. SINCE DECEASED BY LRS: 1. SMT. JAMEELA BEGUM W/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI. IMRAN PASHA S/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 3. SRI ANSAR PASHA S/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 4. SRI. WASEEM PASHA S/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.13, 3RD CROSS, HUDSON ROAD, LINGARAJAPURAM ST. THOMAN TOWN, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560 084 KARNATAKA …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SURESH S. LOKRE, ADVOCATE FOR P1 TO P4) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPT.OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

36

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K.P.WEST BANGALORE-560020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. I.G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & R-2 TO

CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATIONS DATED

10.03.2014 VIDE ANN-N, TO DENOTIFY THE PETITIONER'S LANDS

BEARING SY.NOS 85/1A, 85/1B, 85/1C AND 85/2 TOTALLY

MEASURING 2.38 ACRES, SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE,

KRISHNA RAJAPURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

IN W.P NO. 14689/ 2014:

BETWEEN: SRI. S. SHANTHA KUMAR S/O SANDHYAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO. 60, CHOSAPPA LAAYOUT VEERANNA PALYA AREBIC COLLEGE POST

BANGALORE-560045 ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING

37

BANGALORE-560 001. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE- 560 020 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R4; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 NOT TO UNDERTAKE ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IN THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 16646/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIVENKATAPPA S/O JINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) 2. SRI MUNISWAMY S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BOTH ARE R/O SRIRAMAPURA JAKKUAR POST YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE-560064

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY L.K., ADVOCATE)

38

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 4. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PASSED BY THE R-2 AND PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA OFFICIAL GAZETTE DATED 23.02.2004 IN PART-III NO.274, AS CONTAINED IN ANNEX-E, AS FAR AS ITS RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY. IN W.P NO. 17051/ 2014:

BETWEEN:

DR. HEMAVATHI HEGDE AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O RAJ BALLAL NO.25, SHANTHINIKETHAN APARTMENTS

39

SECTOR A, AMRUTHNAGAR

BANGALORE-560 092. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAJAGOPALAN R., ADVOCATE) AND:

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. ...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO EXECUTE A LEASE CUM SALE DEED AND PUT THE PETITIONER IN POSSESSION OF THE ALLOTED SITE BEARING NO. 57, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BLOCK - XVI MEASURING 15 METERS X 24 METERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AT THE EARLIEST AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 17594/ 2014:

BETWEEN:

SRI. SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAIAH, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK NOTE: BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

40

MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF


ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 DATED 28.03.2014 WHICH

IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-C AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 19729/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHAILA PRABHU NEE SHEVGOOR W/O SRI.SUDHIR R.PRABHU, AGED 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.406, BLOCK I, KRISHNA APARTMENTS, ALI ASKER ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052. 2. SMT. LATHA SHEVGOOR KAMATH D/O SRI.G.K.SHEVGOOR, AGED 46 YEARS,

REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT.JAYANTHI SHEVGOOR, RESIDING AT NO.502, BLOCK I, KRISHNA APARTMENTS,

41

ALI ASKER ROAD, BANGALORE-560052.

…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N. RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDAH, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A. LOKANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF


RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE SCHEDULE LANDS BELONGING

TO THE PETITIONERS FROM ACQUISITION FOR ARKAVATHY

LAYOUT AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 21158/ 2014: BETWEEN: M/S PRAMOD MODERN EDUCATION TRUST, (REGD.) NO.33, CHALAKERE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANASWADI POST,

42

BANGALORE-560 043, REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECRETARY, V.VENKATARAMA REDDY

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGLAORE-560 001, REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECT THE

RESPONDENT BDA TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED

25.04.2014 VIDE ANNX-H AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 23897/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT K. S. VIJAYALAKSHMI

W/O K.C. CHOWDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.19, ANANDNAGAR EXTENSION, SUMANGALI SEVA ASHRAMA ROAD,

43

CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.N. ASWATHANARAYAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. COWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. KARNATAKA STATE KHADI GRAMODYOGA WORKERS HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.10, JASMA BHAVAN ROAD, (MILLERS TANK BUND ROAD), BANGALORE, 560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO FOR R2; SRI. B. RUDRAGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 27.01.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2-B.D.A. ANNEX-M AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 28861/ 2014: BETWEEN:

1. SRI MUNISWAMY S/O ANJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/A NO.63, SAMPIGEHALLI

44

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE 2. SRI. GOVINDARAJU S/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.1/3, SAMPIGEHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE 3. SRI. NAGARAJU S/O MUNI VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.30, SAMPIGEHALLI, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE 4. SRI. VENKATASWAMY S/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A NO.31, SAMPIGEHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABHUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020

REPTD., BY ITS COMMISSIONER

45

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRILIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R2 VIDE ANNX-B AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 30731/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT. ERAMMA W/O LATE BUDANNA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/A SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE, MARAMMA TEMPLE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA POST, BANGALORE- 560 001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. HEMANTH RAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560 020. 2. THE ADDL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560 020.

3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOUSING AND

46

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT SCHEME PREPARED BY THE BDA FOR FORMATION OF "ARKAVATI LAYOUT" HAS LAPSED AS CONTEMPLATED U/S.27 OF THE BDA ACT 1976 & AS WELL AS SUBSECTION(1) & (2) OF THE SECTION 25 OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION & TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS SCHEDULE LANDS IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 31723/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAMMED MUJAHID ALI S/O MOHAMMED HYDER, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.52, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKANAGARA HOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.- 560 077 2. SRI. SYED FAROOQULLA HUSSAINY S/O SYED NOORULLA HUSSINY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKANAGARA, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077 3. SRI. M. SIRAJ UDDIN S/O LATE MUSTAFFA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, GEDDALAHALLI,

VINAYAKANAGARA, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK -560 077

47

4. SRI. ILYAS PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKA NAGAR, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077 5. SRI. SHAIK ASLAM S/O AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT NO. 14, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKANAGAR, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE AND SRI. P. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560 002. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION OF THE LAND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/SEC. 17(1) OF THE BDA ACT 1976 VIDE NO. BDA/COMMR/ALAO /LA9/104/2002-03 DATED 03/02/2013 (ANNEXURE-A) AND NOTIFICATION ISSUED

48

U/SEC.19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE NO.UDD 193 MNX, BANGALORE, DATED 23/02/2004 (ANNEXURE-B) ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT HAS LAPSED/ IS ABANDONED IN SO FAR THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 33774/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE H. APPANNAGOWDA, 2. SRI H. KODANDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, 3. SMT. RAMAKKA W/O H.SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, ALL RESIDIENT OF K.NARAYANAPURA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

49

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. G.LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; SRI. K.A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYAN RAO, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DT: 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-G AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33777/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O.LATE MUNINANJAPPA, 2. SRI RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O.LATE MUNINANJAPPA, 3. SRI KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. MUNINANJAPPA, ALL RESIDENTS OF SAMPIGEHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 064.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)

50

AND; 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 4. B. BYRANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O SRI. K.B. BYRANNA, NO. 3016, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN, RPC, LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-40 5. PRABHAKAR. S. SHENOY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O. SRI. SUNDAR SHENOY NO. 28, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN, 3RD CROSS SARASWATHI NAGAR VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE- 40 6. KANTHARAJU S/O K.R. ISHWARAIAH NO.14 ANNAPURNESHWARI NAGAR, MUDALAPALYA, NEAR VIJAYANAGAR EDUCATION SOCIETY BANGALORE-72

7. K. RAJASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O SRI. KEMPEGOWDA NO. 56, 9TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, 14TH PHASE, 7TH BLOCK

51

GURURAJA LAYOUT , BSK 3RD STATE, BENGALURU-85. 8. D. MANOHARAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O DURAISWAMY NO.5, 4TH MAIN, NEAR PALANI BUILDING SWATANTRANAGAR SRIRAMPURA BANGALORE-21. 9. D. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE D. GUNDU RAO, NO.38, 8TH 'B'MAIN 1ST CROSS , SRINIDHI LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE-97 10. P. CHANDRASHEKARAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O. S. RAMAMURTHY NO.76, NANJAPPA LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE-97 11. HUSSAIN SAB KALIMIRCHI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O CHANDU SAB NO. 146, 4TH MAIN, 12TH CROSS BEML LAYOUT, ITPL ROAD THUBARAHALLI BANGALORE-66 12. SMT. GIRIJA PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O. H.N. SRINIVASA PRAKASH NO. 18, PANCHAVATI APARTMENTS, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN,

SRIRAMPURA BANGALORE-21

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

52

SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED RESPONDENTS) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-G AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 34084/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT KAMALAMMA WIFE OF HANUMANTHAPPA, GRAND DAUGHTER OF M.RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT: 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT NO. 31, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR PANCHAYAT, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE -560064

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.S. BHAT, ADVOCATE AND SRI. N.K. KANTHARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560020 2. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NORTH DIVISION, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE 560020 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX,

R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE 560032 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

53

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE 560032 5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BANGALORE 560001. s …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R4; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE R-1

TO 5 HAVE NO RIGHT OR WHATSOEVER TO DEMOLISH THE

PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.40(CURRENT

SY.NO.40/P1P1), MEASURING 2 ACRES 16 GUNTAS SITUATED AT

SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR PANCHAYAT, YELAHANKA

HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TQ., BANGALORE AND PRESENTLY

COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF BBMP WITHOUT THE

PROPERTY BEING NOTIFIED FOR ACQUISITION IN THE

PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DT: 03.02.2003 & FINAL

NOTIFICATION DT 23.02.2004 AND IS IN THE BBMP

JURISDICTION AND THE R-1 TO 3 DO NOT GET JURISDICTION.

IN W.P NO. 34259/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SHRI H B SHIVARAM S/O LATE H.K.BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,. 2. SHRI. H.B. SRINIVASA S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. SHRI. H.B.SOMASHEKAR

54

S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 4. SHRI. H.B. CHIDANANDA S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 5. SHRI. H.B. DAYANANDA S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 6. SMT. R. ANURADHA SUDHAKAR W/O LATE H.B. SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ALL RESIDING AT NO.40, I CROSS, SHANTHIVANA, SANJEEVINI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 092.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A.V. NISHANTH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BANGALORE - 560 001, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

4. M/S SHANTHA INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES A PARTNERSHIP ENTERPRISES HAVING OFFICE AT MAVALLI CHIKKANNA CHARITIES BUILDING SUBEDAR CHATRAM ROAD,

55

BANGALORE- 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. GEORGE PHILIP, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. B.VACHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-D TO THE W.P. AND ETC. IN W.P NO.34272/ 2014: BETWEEN: MRS NILOFER GEORGE AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O LATE MR PRABHAKARAN GEORGE R/AT NO.95/50, TIRUMANGALAM ROAD VILLIVAKKAM, CHENNAI 600 049 BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY MR SHAM MOHAN S/O MOHAN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.300, 10TH CROSS BDS NAGAR, K NARAYANAPURA BANGALORE - 560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE 560 001

56

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE 560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE 560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH TH II FINAL NOTIFICATION DT. 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-P AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 34391/ 2014: BETWEEN:

SRI.P.SRINIVASAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE M.PUTTANNA, R/AT NO.127, S.P.NILAYA, K.NARAYANAPURA, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE-560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE, BY ITS COMMISSIONER-560001.

57

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. SHIVAKUMARAPPA T.C., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 BANGALORE DTD 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX-F AND ETC.

IN WP NO.35204/2014:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O T C CHINNASWAMY REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI T C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C CHINNASWAMY 2. SRI T C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C CHINNASWAMY 3. SRI T H BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C HEMANNA REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER T.C.HEMANNA S/O LATE CHIKKANNA. 4. SRI T C HEMANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKANNA

58

5 . SRI T C CHINNASWAMY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKANNA REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI T C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C CHINNASWAMY ALL RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST BANGALORE-560020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKAR NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. K. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE

KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT IE., ANNEXURE-K IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS IN SY.NO.94/1 OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE

59

EAST TQ. MEASURING 2 ACRES 38 GUNTAS (INCLUDING 3 GUNTAS KHARAB) AND ETC., IN WP NO.35243/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O KEMPANNA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 077. 2. SRI NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O MUNISHAMAPPA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE KRISHANARAJAPURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560 077. 3. SRI SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O RAMAIAH R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE KRISHANARAJAPURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING &

URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

60

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 003.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKAR NARAYANA RAO AND

SRI. K. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.

IN WP NO.35247/2014: BETWEEN: 1. A.APPANNA

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE ANJINAPPA

2. A. MUNEGOWDA

S/O SRI.T.THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

3. A.SATISH

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O A.APPANNA

ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING

61

DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.


BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.

IN WP NO.35305/2014:

BETWEEN:

C.SANTAMARIA AGED 65 YEARS D/O PETER A. SANTAMARIA NO.4, DAVIS ROAD RICHARDS TOWN BANGALORE-560 084.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAPIREDDY G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.


T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

62

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH PRLY. NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R2 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE ANNEXURE-E. IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC. IN WP NO.35609/2014: BETWEEN: 1. V.PRAKASH

S/O SRI P.D.VIJAYAGOPAL AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.19, 1ST CROSS OIL MILL ROAD, SAIT PALYAM LINGARAJAPURAM BANGALORE-560 084.

2. E.MEERA BAI

W/O SRI.J.VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.4/16, PARSN RIVIER IV MAIN ROAD EXTENSION KOTTURPURAM CHENNAI-600 085.

3. MRS.M.E.SUJATHA

W/O SRI.R.HARIHARADAS

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.3/20, FOURT MAIN ROAD KOTTUR GARDENS CHENNAI – 600 085.

...PETITIONERS

63

(BY SRI. H.R.ANANTHA KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT URBAN AND HOUSING MULTI-STORIED BUILDING VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K.P. WEST, BANGALORE.


BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K.P. WEST, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-F ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AND ETC. IN WP NO.36164/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.VENKATAMMA

W/O RAMAIAH MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

2. SRI R.SAMPANGIRAMAIAH

S/O RAMAIAH MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT K.NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE

64

K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK-561 009. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. K.C.VISWESHWARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001.

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.


BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE 2ND

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AS

ULTRAVIRES OF THE POWERS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT,

ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL

RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.

IN WP NO.36166/2014:

BETWEEN: 1. SMT.MUNIVEERAMMA

W/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

65

2. SRI RAJKUMAR

S/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

3. SMT.VARALAKSHMI

D/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

4. SRI NAGESH

S/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

ALL ARE RESIDING AT K.NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077. ...PETITIONERS


REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001.


T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.


BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE 2ND

66

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AS ULTRAVIRES OF THE POWERS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT, ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC. IN WP NO.36489/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI SYED NOORULLA

S/O SYED AHMED AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

2. SMT.MUMTAZ BEGUM

W/O SYED NOORULLA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

BOTH ARE R/AT NO.25, GEDDALAHALLI, KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.

3. SMT. MEHER AYESHA

D/O SYED EHUSHAMUDDIN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.103, GEDDAHALLI KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.

4. MRS.LAIQHA KHADRI

W/O MOHAMMED SUHEB AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.42, GEDDAHALLI KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.

5. SRI.MOHAMMED IBRAHIM

S/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.82, GEDDAHALLI KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.

6. SRI.MOHAMMED JAWED ALAM

S/O MOHAMMED BADIUZZAMA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.12, GEDDALAHALLI

67

KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.

7. SRI.YENAYATHULLA KHAN GORI

S/O AHMEDULLA KHAN GHORI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

8. SMT.NASEEBA BANO

W/O SRI. YENAYATHULLA KHAN GORI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS SL.NO.7 & 8 ARE R/AT NO.23 & 24 GEDDALAHALLI, KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560 002.


REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.



CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE

ACQUISITION OF THE AND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDETS IN

PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/S 17(1) OF THE

BDA ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE-A) AND

NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE NO.UDD

193 MNX, BANGALORE DATED 23.02.2004 (ANNEXURE-B)

ISSUED BY THE R2 HAS LAPSED / IS ABANDONED IN SO FAR

68

THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND

ETC.

IN WP NO.36525/2014:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

2. SRI MUNIRAJU S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

3. SRI BACHE GOWDA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

4. SRI ANJANAPPA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

5. SRI T.BAIRE GOWDA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

(ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 064.) ...PETITIONERS


REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001.

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER) KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020

69

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.


THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 BANGALORE DATED

18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS SERIAL NO.979,

SY.NO.30 (NEW SY.NO.30/1) MEASURING 07 ACRES 00 GUNTAS

OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU

NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC.,

IN WP NO.36971/2014: BETWEEN: SRI SRINIVAS J. S/O LATE K.V.JAIRAM AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.326, 15TH CROSS SADASHIVANAGARA BENGALURU-560 030. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.N. SHIVANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001.


(REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER) KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020

70

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE RE-

MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 BANGALORE

DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS SERIAL

NO.845, SY.NO.76/2 MEASURING 00 ACRES 23 GUNTAS OF

JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH

TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC.

IN WP NO.37446/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DODDAPAPAMMA

AGED 81 YEARS WIFE OF LATE K.S.THIMMAIAH RESIDING AT NO.88/A KETHARAMANAHALLI, I BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010.

2. SMT. SUNITA PATIL

AGED 32 YEARS WIFE OF UMESH PATIL RESIDING AT H.NO.2153, D-BLOCK OPPOSITE CORPORATION BANK SAHAKARNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. C.M.NAGABHUSHANA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. B. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA

71

BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.


T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.


BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BINPIN HEGDE AND SRI. B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF

CERTIORARI/ANOTHER OTHER ORDER/DIRECTION OF SIMILAR

NATURE QUASHING ANNEXURE-K DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY

THE R1. IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THE HON’BLE COURT HOLDS

THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-K,

THAN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT ANNEXURE-M

DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC.,

IN WP NO.38055/2014:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE SONNAPPA

2. SRI.VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE SONNAPPA

3. SRI.CHIKKAPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE SONNAPPA

72

4. SMT.MUNILAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY

ALL RESIDING AT KEMPAPURA H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 001.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR AND SRI. I.G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3)


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL

NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE

ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.

IN WP NO.38463/2014: BETWEEN: 1. MR. CONRAD KING

S/O MR.ARNOLD KING AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

73

2. MRS. LYNETTE LOUISE KING

W/O MR.CONRAD KING AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.JEFFERY DAVID KING S/O ARNOLD KING, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.108/6 APURVA MAPLES, APARTMENTS G-14 4TH FLOOR, 5TH BLOCK 1ST MAIN, HENNUR, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 084. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SMT. NALEENA LOGAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.

2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK BANGALORE-560 020. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

4. MR.M.C.NARAYANASWAMY

S/O MR.CHANGALVARAYA NAIDU …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 R4 DELETED AS PER ORDER DATED 31.05.2019)

74

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, VIDE ANNEDURE-G ISSUED BY THE R1, SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN WP NO.38471/2014 BETWEEN: JOSEPH C. AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE CHOWRAPPA NO.B2, MANYATHA RESIDENCY RACHENAHALLI, NAGAWARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-45. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.


T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

( BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)



NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE

75

KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE

ANNEXURE-D IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS

CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC.,

IN WP NO.38472/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAMES RAJU REDDY

SON OF LATE SRI D.CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

2. SMT REBECCA JAMES

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS WIFE OF SRI JAMES RAJU REDDY

3. SMT J.RANITHA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS DAUGHTER OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY

4. SMT J.RONILLA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS DAUGHTER OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY

5. SRI J.DAVID RAJ REDDY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS SON OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.140, D.CHOWRAPPA LAYOUT ERANNAPALAYA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST BAGNLORE – 560 045. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.

2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

76


3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE ANNEXURE-D IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN WP NO.38661/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI K.R.NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH R/AT NO.268/A VENKATE GOWDA LAYOUT NEAR VENKATESHWAR TEMPLE KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.

2. SRI R.M. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH R/AT NO.925/A, 3RD B CROSS H.R.B.R., I BLOCK, KALYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 043.

3. SMT. K.R.RUKMINIAMMA

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O LATE G. RAMAIAH &

W/O SRI V.BACHE GOWDA 4. SMT. B.PREETHI

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS D/O SRI V. BACHE GOWDA

77

3 & 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.9 1ST MAIN ROAD, G.RAMAIAH LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.

5. SMT. K.R. MANJULA

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS D/O LATE G.RAMAIAH R/AT NO.11, 1ST MAIN ROAD G.RAMAIAH LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. C.M. NAGABHUSHANA, AND SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.


T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 7 R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-G

DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF

THIS HON’BLE COURT HOLDS THAT RESPONDENTS HAVE

78

POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-G THAN TO DECLARE THAT,

DECLARTION AT ANNEXURE-J DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO

EXISTS AND ETC.

IN WP NO.38753/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.C.SAVITRAMMA

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE M.RAMAIAH R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 026.

2. SRI.R.VASUDEVAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O LATE M.RAMAIAH R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 026. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.


BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

79


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED

NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE

ANNEXURE-D ISSUED BY R1 AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 39383/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI.N.KANTHARAJU S/O N. NARASIMHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.72 8TH MAIN,BTM LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE,BANGALORE-560 076 2. SRI K. HEMANTH S/O N. KANTHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, DECEASED SON OF SMT T. N. CHANDRAVATHI R/AT NO.2/35, 2ND "C" MAIN ROAD, 6TH "D"CROSS,BOOPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560 054 3. MRS. MARY VARGHESE W/O SUNNY VARGHESE, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/T NO.571, SUNNY'S NEST, SUBBANNA PALYA, 2ND CROSS,BANASWADI BANGALORE-560 043 4. MR BANKIM D' SHAH S/O DHANSHUKLAL R. SHAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

5. MRS AMITHA B. SHAH W/O BANKIM D SHAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.4 & 5 ARE

80

R/AT NO.201 "ARIHANTH" GOVINDANAGAR,BORIBALI WEST MUMBAI-400 098 6. SMT LAVANYA S MURALI W/O S MURALI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.213, 6TH CROSS,R R TEMPLE STREET, DEVASANDRA MAIN ROAD, K R PURAM,BANGALORE-560 036 7. SMT T A GOWRI W/O K NARENDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.33/659, VARMA LAYOUT,VIDYASARAGA, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, SHIVARAMA KARANTH POST, BANGALORE-560 077 8. SRI P. U. KANNAN S/O P. UMAMANI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.277, SECTOR-C,JALAVAYU VIHA KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE-560 54 9. SRI VEERESH CHANNAVEERAIAH HIREMATH,S/O CHANNAVEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.TYPE-III/7 IVRI,HEBBAL BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020

81

2. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF


NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEX-A DATED

18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS

UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE

INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED

NOTIFICATION AT ANNEX-A AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 39633/2014: BETWEEN: SRI SEETHARAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O MUNIYAPPA, R/AT SRIRAMPURA, KASABA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 029

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. CHANDRASHEKAR ACHAR, ADVOCATE SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

82

M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF


NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY R-1 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-C

AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 39832/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKATHYAPPA, AGED 80 YEARS, R/AT CHEELLAKERE VILLAGE, KALAYANAGAR & POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ., BANGALORE DISTRICT-560045 (NOT CLAIMED SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFIT)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA AND SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. PATEL, ADVOCATES)


83

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-1 REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY

NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) DATED 03.02.2003,

PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF

THE PETITIONER'S LAND BEARING SY.NO.129/2 MEASURING 25

GUNTAS OUT OF 30 GUNTAS, LAND BEARING SY.NO.133/1

MEASURING 32 GUNTAS OUT OF 1 ACRE 2 GUNTAS, LAND

BEARING SY.NO.133/2 MEASURING 6 GUNTAS & LAND BEARING

SY.NO.133/3 MEASURING 5 GUNTAS, SITUATE AT CHELLAKERE

VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK

PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEX-M AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 40204/2014:

BETWEEN:

SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE VENKATAREDDY RESIDING AT KEMPAPURA H.A FARM POST,

84

BANGALORE-560024 (SR.CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED). ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-5600020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)



NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS

ANNEX-D AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.40379/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI K. S. RAMANATHAN SON OF K.A.SHIVARAMA KRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.Y-2, EVERSHINE APARTMENTS, NO.134, NHCS LAYOUT,

85

3RD STAGE, 4TH BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560079 2. MR.NAYEEN BASHA SON OF ABDUL MUTHALIB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDNIG AT NO.323, HBR LAYOUT, 8TH CROSS, NEAR WISDOM SCHOOL, YASEEN NAGAR, BANGALORE-560043. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 2. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-56 0020. 3. THE SECRETARY GOVT. OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE- 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANN-A, DATED 18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THEEYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANN-A AND ETC.

86

IN W.P. NO. 41394/2014: BETWEEN: 1. A SHEELA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, D/O P. ARJUNAN 2. A. KAVITHA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, D/O P. ARJUNAN 3. A. HAVILA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, D/O P. ARJUNAN ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.40, GEETHA MANDIR ROAD, 1ST CROSS, J.C. NAGAR, (M.R. PALYAM), BANGALORE-560 006.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-1 BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3)

87

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 09.04.2014 VIDE ANNX-G ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 41422/2014: BETWEEN: SRI S. MUNEGOWDA S/O LATE SONNAMARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NANJA REDDY P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANALORE-560 003.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN-B AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F PASSED BY THE R-1 AND 2 IN SO FAR AS THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.33/1 OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST

88

TALUK MEASURING 3 ACRES 10 GUNTAS AND DELETE THE SAME FROM THE ACQUISITION AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 41427/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O R NARAYANAGOWDA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560026

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-1 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1, DATED 18.06.2013, WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-D AND ETC.

89

IN W.P. NO. 41428/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.KEMPAMMA W/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2. SRI K. C. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE P.KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3. SRI KESHAVKUMAR S/O LATE P.KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SRI K MURTHY S/O LATE P.KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 5. SMT NAGAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 6. SRI PRAKASH S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 7 . SRI K SHANKAR S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 8 . SRI JAYARAM S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 9 . SRI C. K. MANJUNATH S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI,

YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK- 560 038. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)

90

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE, BY ITS COMMISSIONER-560 001 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-

D AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 41858/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT ASHWATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, W/O LATE G. RAMAIAH, RESIDING AT NO.15, MARUTHI NILAYA, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.

(SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2. SMT. G.R. SHAILAJA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O M GOPALA KRISHNE GOWDA, R/AT NO.1, SY NO.27/3,

91

HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA,

BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-F, DATED

18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS

HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER

TO ISSUE ANN-F THAN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT

ANN-H DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 43815/2014:

BETWEEN:

MRS K. JAYASHREE W/O D. VIJAYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 206

92

MARUTI LAYOUT HEBBALA, DASARA HALLI HA FORM PO BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESWARA P. N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT III FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA DR B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER NO. 20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER NO. 20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE B.D.A. ACT ISSUED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEX-A) IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY IS CONCERNED BEING PROPERTY NO.206, CARVED OUT IN SY.NO.48/1 OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 43963/2014:

BETWEEN: 1. SRI KRISHNAPPA

93

S/O.LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SRI S. R. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 3. SRI S. R. MURTHY S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 4. SRI S. R. ANAND S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI-560064 BANGALORE NORTH(ADDITIONAL) TALUK-560064

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KALYAN R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BANGALORE-01 (BY ITS SECRETARY) 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-22. (REPTS. BY ITS COMMISIONER)

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-22.

94

4. THE UNDER SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE-01. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R4; SRI. M.N. RAMAJANEJA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-4 AS PER ANNEX-A TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR AS SERIAL NO.921 IN THE FINAL NOTIFICATION IS CONCERNED IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 44306/2014: BETWEEN: 1. LAKSHMANA G. S/O GOVINDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, NO.485, 6TH MAIN, 8TH MAIN, MICO COLONY, BTM 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE. 2. DR. SANJAY B PATIL S/O BABU GOWDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.204/B/3, 1ST FLOOR 6TH MAIN ROAD, 27TH CROSS 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE. 3. LINGARAJU B. S/O S. BHEEMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO.204/B/3, I FLOOR, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 27TH CORSS,

3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE.

95

4. CHANDRASHEKAR N.R., S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, NO.408, 22ND MAIN, 2ND STAGE, J.P.NAGAR, MYSORE. 5. THARANATHA SETTY I. S/O LATE SHESHA SHETTY, AGED 61 YEARS, HOTEL ANUPAMA, 5 & 6, TANK BUND ROAD, BANGALORE. 6. MUDDAMMA, W/O RAMASWAMY, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.59/544, "SAI SADANA", SANTHE BEEDHI, ANEKAL TOWN, BANGALORE. 7. JAYAMMA. D., Q/O D NARASHIMAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.6/1, N R ROAD, SBM OPP, ANEKAL TOWN, BANGALORE DISTRICT. 8. FAROOQ MUNNAWAR, W/O L.PEER MUNAVAR, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.16/21, GROUND FLOOR, I CROSS, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, OLD GURUPPANA PALYA, BANGALORE. 9. SEETHA LAKSHMI R. W/O T. RAMAMURTHY, AGED 58 YEARS, NO.35, KAVERAPPA LAYOUT, MILLAR TANK BUND ROAD,

BANGALORE CANTONMENT, BANGALORE.

96

10. VASANTHI ASHOK, W/O ASOKAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, NO.35, KAVERAPPA LAYOUT, VASANTHNAGAR, BANGALORE. 11. JAGADAMBA B.K. D/O BASAPPA, AGED 69 YEARS, NO.504/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD, KENGERI UPANAGAR, BANGALORE. 12. SUNDAR D.T., W/O DESH LINGA GOWDA, AGED 50 YEARS, NO.95, 3RD CROSS, BASAVESHWARANAGARA LAYOUT, VIJAYA NAGAR, BANGALORE. 13. RAMACHANDRAPPA B. S/O B. NANEPPA, AGED 74 YEARS, NO.39/1, 2ND MAIN, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE. 14. BAYAPPA REDDY Y., S/O LATE YARAPPA REDDY, AGED 75 YEARS, NO.354, 9TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE. 15. SUSEELA GOUD. M., W/O BASAVANA GOWDA M, AGED 63 YEARS, NO.48/A, 18TH A CROSS, 1ST MAIN, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR,

HEBBAL KUMPARA, BANGALORE.

97

16. BALARAM N., S/O LATE NARASHIMAIAH, AGED 64 YEARS, RAVI. NO.204/17, 4TH MAIN, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE. 17. VIJAYENDRA K.V., S/O K.VEERAIAH, AGED 53 YEARS, RAIV NO.204/17, 4TH MAIN, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE. 18. ANSUYA N, W/O ANANATHAPADMANABHA, AGED 51 YEARS, NO.6, 19TH CROSS, RAMASWAMY LAYOUT, LALJI NAGAR, LAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE. 19. RAMACHANDRA U. S/O K.V. UGRAPPA, AGED 59 YEARS, NO.42, 5TH C MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 20. NAGAPPA U. V. S/O K.V. UGRAPPA, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.42, 5TH C MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 21. THIMMARAJ SETTY T.K. S/O T.V. KENCHARAYA SETTY, AGED 61 YEARS, NO.111/45, 5TH MAIN, OFFICIAL COLONY,

BYRASANDRA, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE. 22. SRIDHARAN A.C. AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

98

S/O A.C. CHANDRASHEKAR, NO.169, 9TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 23. BASAVARAJAIAH M.T. S/O LATE M. THIMMAIAH, AGED 69 YEARS, NO.2515, 9TH CROSS, S.S. PURAM, TUMKUR. 24. VISHALAKSHA KADIVAL, W/O PANDURANG ACHAR KADIVAL, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.265, 1ST BLOCK, 8TH CROSS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 25. NAGALAKSHMI S W/O KRISHNA MURTHY S, AGED 63 YEARS, NO.47, 5TH C MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. 26. MALATHI, W/O GURURAJ WADYER, AGED 45 YEARS, NO.11, 14TH CROSS, KANAKANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. 27. C.T.H. TAURO, S/O LATE C.M.TAURO, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.72, 5TH MAIN, 5TH CORSS, SRI KRISHNA GARDEN, R.R.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 059. 28. SRINIVAS K.E.,

S/O ESWARAPPA K.N., AGED 53 YEARS, NO.574, GROUND FLOOR, NEAR NEW TOWN PUBLIC SCHOOL,

99

8TH B MAIN, B SECTOR, YALAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. 29. NANDINI K.V. KRISHNA PANI, AGED 34 YEARS, NO.X-104, ADARSHA APARTMENT, DEVARA BEESANAHALLI, BANGALORE. 30. PANKAJA RAMESHESHA, W/O M.R. RAMASHESHA, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.801, MELODY BLOCK, H.H.TAMBOURINE APARTMENTS, KANAKAPURA ROAD, J P NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BANGALORE-560 078. 31. VATSALAL MURTHY, W/O H.R.K. MURTHY, AGED 60 YEARS, D116, TOWN 2, BRIGADE PARMSPRINGS, 24TH MAIN, 7TH PHASE, J P NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078. 32. INDIRA, D/O ARUNACHALAM K, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.190, 9TH CROSS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 33. SHYLAJA S W/O V. SHANKARANARAYANA, AGED 50 YEARS, NO.303, 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK-02, SKYLINE CITY APARTMENTS, CHANDRA LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI 1ST STAGE,

BANGALORE -560 072. 34. PRADEEP NAGARAJ, S/O H.R.NAGARAJA, AGED 56 YEARS,

100

NO.289, 11TH A CROSS, J P NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE-560 078. 35. NAGA PRASAD K.V. S/O K.V. VENKATESHAIAH, AGED 37 YEARS, NO.603, RMZ APARTMETN, YALAHANKA, BANGALORE. 36. SRINIVAS K S/O ESHWARAPPA, K.N. AGED 53 YEARS, NO.574, GROUND FLOOR, NEAR NEW TOWN PUBLIC SCHOOL, 8TH MAIN, B-SECTOR, YALAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE. 37. M/S TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.12/3A, NANDA GOKULA, YAMUNABAI ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR, BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, VENKATESHAIAH K.V. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. B.M.HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR P4, P8, P9, P11,P13,P14,P26,P29, P32 & P36; SRI. B. RANGASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR P1-3,5-7, 10,12,15-25, 27, 28, 30,31, 33 TO 35; V/O/DTD 09/02/17 PETITION DISMISSED AGAINST P37) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001,

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,

101

BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

4. SMT. NARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE GUNDU RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT DOOR NO.22, 1ST FLOOR, BALAJI LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 042. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SMT. VASANTHA LAKSHMI H.V., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED R5)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-

M IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERNED

AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 44527/2014:

BETWEEN:

MR P.V.THOMAS PANICKER S/O SRI. GEE VARGHESE PANICKER AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT NO. 34, SHANTINAGAR PRESS ROAD TRIVENDRUM-695 001 KERALA. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA KESVY, ADVOCATE)

102

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. KESHAVA R AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED U/S 17(1) &(3) OF THE

BDA ACT 1976 VIDE ANNX-E ISSUED BY R-2 IN SO FAR AS THE

PETITIONERS LANDS ARE CONCERNED AS THE SAME IS NOT

REQUIRED FOR THE SCHEME OF THE BDA AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 44742/2014: BETWEEN: SMT NANJAMMA W/O N.SHAMANNA, D/O LATE N.NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, JAKKUR, JAKKUR VILLAGE, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. S. MAHESH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. K.R. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)

103

AND: 1. THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4. ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAND ACQUISITION T.CHOWDIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AT ANNX-K AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THEREOF IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS LAND DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE HEREUNDER IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 44835/2014: BETWEEN:

SRI SRINIVAS J. S/O LATE K.V.JAIRAM, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.326, 15TH CROSS,

104

SADASHIVANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 030.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMA BHAT K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER), KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU -560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. KESHAV R. AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. S.G. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, UNDER SEC.19(1) OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 ISSUED BY THE R-1, AT SERIAL NO. 896, PERTAINING TO LAND COMPRISED IN SY.NO.103/1, MEASURING 00 ACRES 36 GUNTAS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TQ. ISSUED BY THE R1, AS PER ANN-B AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 45486/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAVIKUMAR

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O R. NARAYANAGOWDA, R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K. R. PURAM HOBLI,

105

BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560 030

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-01 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4. SRI N. B. CHANDRASHEKARIAH S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NIDUVANI VILLAGE, HALLI MYSORE HOBLI, HOLENARSIPUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-585 154. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE

ANNEX-H AND ETC.

106

IN W.P. NO. 46766/2014: BETWEEN: MRS.M.SHAMSHAD BEGUM W/O LATE K. SADIQ SAHEB AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/A NO.157-D ASWATH NAGAR, ALANKAR LAYOUT TANISANDRA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-560 045. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE AND SRI. G. GANGIREDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING BANGALORE 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER FROM ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS WHICH ARE NOTIFIED FOR THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATI LAYOUT, I.E., 1 ACRE 20 GUNTAS OF LAND IN SY. NO.14/1, IN FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED

23.02.2004 SITUATED IN THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ. BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 04.07.2014 AS PER ANNX-B AND ETC.

107

IN W.P. NO. 47103/2014: BETWEEN: SMT JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O HANUMANTHAPPA, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI-560 023 BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX-C AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 47105/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT CHIKKAKAMAKKA

108

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA, 2. SMT. KAMAKSHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O LATE HOODI MUNISWAMY, 3. SMT. A.P.PADMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA, 4. MR. A.P.NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA, ALL RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 0210, BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

109


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS

ENCLOSED AS ANNX-C AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 47106/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT C. SAVITRAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMAIAH, (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIM) 2. SRI. VASUDEVAMURTHY R S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 030

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

110

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF




IN W.P. NO. 47107/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. MUNIANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O MADDURAPPA, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, ASHWATHKATTE ROAD, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS

111

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF




IN W.P. NO. 47608/2014: BETWEEN: SMT USHA S. RAO, W/O LATE SRI. SATHYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A 'MAHATE' NO. 169/1, 2ND MAIN B/W 3RD & 4TH CROSS CHAMRAJAPET BANGALORE-560 018

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PATIL JAI M., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

112

4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001

…RESPONDENTS ( BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4) (R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 20/10/2014) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE LANDS WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT (RFD) IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT ( VIDE ANNX-K TO THE W.P.) AS AGAINST SY.NOS.45/5 & 45/6 IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT ANY ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS AND UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE PETITIONER SO FAR AS PETITIONER SCHEDULE LAND (PROPERTY) AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 47731/2014: BETWEEN: V. VENKATAMARI S/O LATE VENKATASHAMAPPA, AGED 64 YEARS, R/O 297, MARAPPA LAYOUT, S.R.K NAGAR (P.O) BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA,

BANGALORE - 560 001

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER

113

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020 4. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF


NOTIFICATIONS VIDE ANN-D DATED 03.02.2003 AND ANN-F

DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2 IN SO FAR AS IT

RELATED TO 1.37 ACRES OF LAND IN SY.NO.72/2 OF

THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH

TALUK AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 47821/2014: BETWEEN: SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO.78, K NARAYANAPURA ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD SHIVARAMAKARANATH NAGAR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560077 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER SMT PADMAVATHI N D/O SMT RATHNAMMA W/O SRI HARISHA V AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/A NO.78, K NARAYANAPURA ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD

114

SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNTAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2013 PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-H IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 47860/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT K V VEENAMMA

W/O KRSIHNAPPA M AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.86 BHAGYA LAKSHMI TRADERS ANJINEYA TEMPLE STREET

115

YOGESHWARANAGAR ROAD HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 560 024 2. SRI INDER SINGH S/O LATE P ESWAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 52 YEAS R/AT NO.8, 1ST CROSS MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24 3. SHASHI SINHA S/O RAM BABU SINGH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.14 MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24 4. M. RAMAKRSIHNA S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.1, 1ST MAIN MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE 24 5. SUSHMA SHARMA S/O SOHAN SHARMA AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT NO.5, S MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24

6. S ANJALIDEVI D/O LATE SREERAMULU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.4, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE 24

7. SRI NAVEEN LAL SHAH S/O LATE S.L. SHAH R/AT NO.6

116

1ST MAIN MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24

8. SRI PRAKASHAPPA S/O CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.36, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS

MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE 24

9. NINGAPPA A P S/O PUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.53/1, SSA ROAD 4TH MAIN, HEBBAL BANGALORE- 24

10. K NARASIMHALU S/O K OBAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO.56 NAGAIAH BUILDING 1OTH CROSS KALANAGAR KAMMAGONDANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 015. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. L. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE ) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560001 BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE 20 R/P BY ITS COMMISSIONER

117

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE 20

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRLY. NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R2 U/S 17(1) & (3) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, UNDER PRLY. NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 & THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AT ANN-A & ANN-B PASSED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER IN SITUATED IN KEMPAPURA VILLAGE, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TQ. BANGALORE IS CONCERNED AND ETC IN W.P. NO. 47913/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MOHAMMED MOIEZULLA S/O SRI MOHAMMED MUSTAFA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A NO.3, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 2. SRI MOHAMMED ALTAF AHMED S/O MOHAMMED NASIR AHMED AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO.16, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 3. SRI B VARALASKHMI W/O SRI DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

4. SHRI PAVAN KUMAR S/O SRI DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS SL.NO. 3 & 4 R/A NO.17,

118

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 5. SRI B S MURULI S/O SRI M SRIRAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.14, 2ND MAIN ROAD 2ND CROSS, CHANAL ROAD MAGADI ROAD CHOLURALYA BANGALORE-560026 6. SMT T NAZIRA BANU W/O ANEEZ PASHA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/A NO.25, "E" NO.4TH STREET BROADWAY ROAD CROSS BANGALORE-560051 7. SRI SHAIK YARAB S/O MR NAWAB SHARIEFF AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A NO.23, NARAYANASWAMY COMPOUND 2ND CROSS, SONNAPA GARDEN DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI BANGALORE-560045 8. SMT SYEDA UMERA W/O SRI SYED RAFIQ AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/A NO.47, 48, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 9. SRI ATAULLA S/O IBRAHIM AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/A NO.483, DODDANNA NAGAR K B SANDRA, R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032

10. SIR FAIROZ KHAN S/O RAHMAN KHAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.483, DODDANNA NAGAR

119

K B SANDRA, R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032 11. SMT HAJIRA BI W/O SRI SYED MAROOF AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.64, 2ND CROSS, BEHIND P & T QUARTERS KHB MAIN ROAD RANKANAGAR, R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032 12. SMT MUMTAZ UNNISA W/O ASHIAQ AHMED GHOUN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A 92, 5TH CROSS KAUSERNAGAR, R T NAGAR BANGALORE-560032 13. SRI ASAD JAMAL S/O SRI ABDUL KHAYUM AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 14. SRI KURSHID ALAM S/O ASAD JAMAL AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS SL.NO.13 & 14 ARE R/A NO.8/2, 1ST CROSS BEHIND GOVT KANNADA SCHOOL PADARAYANAPURA BANGALORE-560026 15. SRI G RAMESH KUMAR S/O SR. M GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A NO.16, 2ND CROSS N K PALYA, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560051 16. SMT AZHAR JABEEN W/O SYED MOHAMMED SHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

R/A HOUSE NO.52 COOKS ROAD, A THIMMAIAH ROAD CROSS BHARATHI NAGAR BANGALORE-560001

120

17. SRI RAHEEM BAIG S/O ABBAS BAIG AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/A NO.124/97, 4TH MAIN ROAD NEW GURUPPAN PALYA BANNERGHATTA MAIN RAOD BANGALORE-560029 18. SRI MUNEER JAN S/O ABDUL AZEEZ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A E-127 NEW NO.22/9B, RING ROAD NORTH SIDE NAGAWARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-560045 19. SMT FAREEDA BANU W/O SRI SAMIULLAKHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/A NO.1479 RAMA TEMPLE STREET VINAYAKA STREET, IIND CROSS VENKATESPURAM BANGALORE-560045

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560002 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

121



ACQUISITION OF THE LAND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN

PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/SEC. 17(1) OF THE

BDA ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2203 VIDE ANN-A & NOTIFICATION

ISSUED/U/SEC. 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE

ANN-B ISSUED BY THE R2 HAS LAPSED IS ABANDONED IN SO

FAR THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED.

IN W.P. NO. 48577/2014: BETWEEN: SMT VIJAYALAXMI W/O N PANDU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A #167/167-A, 2ND CROSS DEEPIKA LAYOUT CHELLAKERE BANGALORE-560043

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA V RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-01 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORRE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560001

3. THE ADDL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORRE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560001

122

…RESPONDENTS ( BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PASSED BY THE R-2 ANNX-H AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2204, PASSED BY R-1, ANNX-J AND CONSEQUENTIAL AWARD AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 48880/2014: BETWEEN: V. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUTHUR VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE-01 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20.

….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE AND SRI.A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

123

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2010 PASSED BY THE R-2 AND 3 REJECTING THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 5 1/4TH GUNTAS OF THE LAND VIDE ANN-F AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.49567/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O. LATE CHOWDAPPA 2. SRI. JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O. LATE CHOWDAPPA

BOTH RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,

BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE -560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 0020

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

124

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE II FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DTD.18.6.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-H. IN W.P. NO.50260/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.SHANMUGUM S/O.M.MURGAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.43/1, "SRIRAMPURA ROAD, 18TH CROSS, AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BANGALORE-94

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY BANGALORE-1 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 20

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

125

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATIOND ATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S LAND IS CONCERNED VIDE ANN-A AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.50533/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.B.G.GIRIJA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, D/O. LATE GOVINDASWAMY AND W/O. CHENNAKESHAVA, R/AT BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE AND POST, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT 2. SMT. B.G.MANJULA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O. LATE GOVINDASWAMY AND W/O. S.GOPAL R/AT NO.124, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTHA NAGARA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMEBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

126

AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS

RELATING TO ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS OF PRELIMINARY

NOTIFICATION ANNEX-F FINAL NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNEX-G.

IN W.P. NO.51294/2014: BETWEEN: SMT. CHANNAMMA AGEDA BOUT 60 YEARS W/O. LATE KEMPANNA, R/AT THANISANDRA DR.SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

127

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 4. MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA REDDY S/O. THIRUPUL REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 5. SMT. MUNIREDDY SAMPORNAM W/O.SRI.MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA REDDY, AGEDA BOUT 53 YEARS,

RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5 R/AT NO.75, 3RD MAIN, AMARYA JOTHYI LAYOUT CHOLANAGAR, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032

6. SMT.GEETHA BHAVANI W/O. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 7. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD S/O.SRI.CHENNAKESHAVALU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT.53, 3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN, DENA BANK COLONY, GANGOR, BANGALORE-32 8. K.N.VISHWANATH S/O.KADIDA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT KADIADAL HAROGALIAGE POST, TIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIMOGGA-577 411 9. SRI.ANANDA BABU S/O. D.A.NARAYANA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/'A', 16/'A', 13TH CROSS, BESHWANAGAR, MARTHI LAYOUT, DASARHALLI, BANGALORE-24

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3;

128

SRI. B.V. RAMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4-R7; SRI. M.K. SRIPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4-R8; SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R6-R8; SRI. P. RAJESHWARA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S. VASANTH MADHAV, ADVOCATE FOR R9) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.14 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-C AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.51930/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O.LATE NARASAPPA, R/AT SAMIPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O.T.V.KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.22, NEW BEL ROAD, I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-85


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

129

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-D.

IN W.P. NO.51931/2014: BETWEEN: SMT.KANTAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

REP. BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O.T.V.KRSIHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.22, NEW BEL ROAD,

I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 71 ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

130

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-D ISSUED BY THE R-1 TO 3 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.51932/2014:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA 2. ANANDAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O.LATE DODDABYRAPPA 3. SRI.RAMAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA

R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.B.L.NARENDRA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O.C.V.LAKSHMI NARAYAN SHASTRI R/AT NO.29/1, 9TH CROSS, RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE-80

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)

131

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-

E.

IN W.P. NO.52760/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI.NARAYANAPPA S/O. LATE CHANNARARAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA, II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064

2. SRI.C.JAYARAM S/O.LATE CHANNARAYAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRs

132

a) SMT.BHAGYA W/O.LATE C.JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS b) SRI.KIRAN S/O.LATE C. JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS c) SRI.KISHORE S/O.LATE C.JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

PETITIONERS 2(a) TO 2(c) ARE R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064

3. SRI.C.SUBBANNA S/O.LATE CHANNARAYAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs (a) SMT.MUNITHAYAMMA W/O.LATE C. SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT, HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064 (b) SMT.SUJATHA D/O.LATE C. SUBBANNA W/O.SRI.RAMALINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS (c) SMT.VEENA D/O. LATE C.SUBBANNA W/O.SRI.RAMALINGARAJU

3(b) AND 3(c) BOTH ARE

R/AT DEVASHETTIHALLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT

133

(d) SMT.REKHA D/O. LATE C. SUBBANNA W/O.SRI.RAGHU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.390, II CROSS, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 094 (e) SRI.KESHAVA S/O. LATE C. SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA, II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.R. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR

SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.14, ISSUED BY THE R1, AT ANN-D,

134

IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO ACQUIRING THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER. IN W.P. NO.53854/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.MUNISHYAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O.LATE DANDU CHIKKANNA, R/AT NO.261, I MAIN, 2ND CROSS, DASARAHALLI, H.A.FARM POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 024 SINCE DEAD BY LRs 1(a) SMT.GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, D/O. LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA R/AT THAVATAHALLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 1(b) SRI.D.M.GOWDARAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O.LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA R/AT KEMPEGOWDA MAIN ROAD, DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560 024 1(c) SRI.D.M.CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA R/AT KEMPEGOWDA MAIN ROAD, DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHENNARAYA REDDY S., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING,

135

DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE MODIFIED

FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.14 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS PER

ANNEX-Q AND CONSEQUENTLY HOLD THAT PRELIMINARY

NOTIFICATION ISSUED DTD. 3.2.2003 AS PER ANNEX-N AND

FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.23.2.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS PER

ANNEX-P DOES NOT SURVIVE.

IN W.P. NO.54059/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS W/O.DODDABYRAPPA 2. SRI.RAMAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O.LATE DODDABYRAPPA 3. SRI.ANANDMURTHY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA

136

ALL ARE RESIDING AT SMAPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-98 REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.B.L.NAGENDRA PRASAD S/O.C.V.LAKSHMINARAYANA SHASTRY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

R/AT NO.29/A, 9TH CROSS, RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 080. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY R-1 TO

R-3.

137

IN W.P.NO.54083/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. REPESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-G), IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO LANDS IN SURVEY NOS.11 AND 14 OF

VENKATESHAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER NAT SL.NOS. 1037 AND 1040 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.

138

IN W.P.NO.54236/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI MUNIRAJU, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. SRI BACHE GOWDA, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 4. SRI ANJANAPPA, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 5. SRI T. BAIRE GOWDA, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

T CHOWDAIAIH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRSENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

139

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE, DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEX-F), IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 1 GUNTA IN SURVEY NO.27/4 OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELANHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, (SCHEDULE PROPERTY) AT SL.NO.974 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF THERETO AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54358/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SATHYANARAYANA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. S. MUKUNDA RAO S/O SHANKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 RISIDING A/T RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGLAORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 077.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N. SONNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS,

140

DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALROE-560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAID IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-D BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54725/2014: BETWEEN: SMT S. SUJATHA W/O SRI. S. V. GANESH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.8, ROGERS ROAD, RICHARDS TOWN, (C. V. RAMAN NAGAR) BANGALORE-560 005.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001

141

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN

THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1

UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT I.E., ANNEX-P, IN SO

FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER IN

SY.NO.30/6 & 30/7, K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM

HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, MEASURING 22 GUNTAS

AND 26 GUNTAS RESPECTIVELY.


MR N. R. VENKATESHMURTHY S/O SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.5, THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. R. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE)

142

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-H AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.55082/2014: BETWEEN: MR. R. MUNIRAJU S/O SRI RAMAKRISHANAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. R. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING &

143

URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGLORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H

AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.55083/2014: BETWEEN: MR N. R. SRINIVASAPPA SRI. RAMAKRISHANPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. R. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING,

144

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGLORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H

AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.55436/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI R. VENKATARAMAN S/O SRI. M. RAJENDRAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, NO.45, JAYALAKSHMI NILAYA, PANCHAVATI LAYOUT, "VIDHYASAGAR",SARAI PALYA,

THANISANDRA, BENGALURU-560 077. 2. SRI. N.D. NAGARAJ S/O SRI. N.D. NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO.35 & 36, PANCHAVATI LAYOUT, "VIDHYASAGAR", SARAI PALYA, THANISANDRA, BENGALURU-560 077.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H. R. ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE )

145

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020. REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN - K AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - M ISSUED BY R-2

& 1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.55671/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI G. J. LAKSHMIPATHY S/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, VENKATASWAMAPPA LAYOUT, MUNIPUVANNA COMPOUND, MANORAYANAPALYA, R. T. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032

146

2. SRI G. R. NARAYANA SWAMY S/O LATE G. A. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT GORAMODAGU VILLAGE, KOTHANUR POST, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN : 562 105 3. SRI. ABDUL LATIF S/O BABA JAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, MASJID COMPLEX, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560 045 4. SMT. LINGAMMA W/O LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.51,2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS,DINNUR,R T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 5. MRS A. DYANA D/O H. AROKYARAJ, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT NO.19/3, 6TH CROSS,BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, SULTANPALYA MAIN ROAD, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 6. SRI D. SAMSON S/O A. DEVAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.4,3RD CROSS, NANJAPPA GARDEN, BABUSABPALYA,

KALYANNAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 043

147

7. MR M. KHADER PASHA S/O LATE MOHAMMED SARVAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.15, NEAR VIVEKANANDA ENGLISH SCHOOL, MARUTHI SAW MILL CROSS ROAD, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, DR S.R.K. NAGAR POST, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 077 8. SRI CHIKKANNA S/O LATE BAJJE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 9. SRI. HONNAPPA S/O LATE BAJJE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.8 AND 9 ARE R/AT NO.125, BABU REDDY COMPOUND, MANORAYANAPALYA, BANGALORE-560 032 10. MR. S. ANWAR S/O SYED IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.722, 2ND MAIN, BHARATHNAGAR, NEAR PIPE FACTORY, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 077 11. SRI M. RAMESH S/O K MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/T NO.73, SOMESHWARA LAYOUT, SHIVA TEMPLE STREET, BANGALORE-560 045

12. MR. MOHAMMED KHALEEL S/O MOHAMMED IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.17,

148

DASAPPA GARDEN, NEAR HMT LAYOUT, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 13. MRS WAHEEIDA BANU W/O MOHAMMED ISHAQ, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO 8/3, 20TH CROSS,VIVIYANI ROAD, SAGAYAPURAM, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005 14 . SRI S. MURUGAN S/O SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.25/35, RMV SECOND STAGE, BOOPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560 094 15. MR SYED JAMEEL S/O SYED PEER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.69, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 16. SRI C. SRINIVASALU S/O LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.994, S. N. HALLI, B. NANJAPPA LAYOUT, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE ) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,

149

M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. S.G. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R2 AT ANN-S, DT. 18.06.2014, AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL & THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW & PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANN - S AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.56203/2014:

BETWEEN:

SRI. GOPAL S/O LATE BASAVAPUJARI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.10, 2ND CROSS, KIRLOSKAR FOUNDRY,

OPP TO ISKON TEMPLE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BANGALORE-22.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. N. SURESH, ADVOCATE )

AND:

THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE)

150

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 08.10.2013, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANN - H TO THE W.P. AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56300/2014: BETWEEN: MR K. V. THOMAS S/O LATE VARKEY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.222 2ND A CROSS, 1ST STAGE 2ND BLOCK HBR LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 043

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRA SHEKAR R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE- 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

151

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERNED VIDE ANN - E AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56350/2014: BETWEEN: SMT MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/O SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL

152

NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. UDD/426/MNJ/2011, BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R1 (ANNEXURE-E), IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 6 GUNTAS IN SURVEY NO. 6/5B OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, (SCHEDULE PROPERTY) AT SL.NO.934 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56646/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI DODDAKALLAPPA S/O LATE DODDACHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 2. SRI A. G. SRINIVASAMURTHY S/O LATE DODDACHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHA HALLI SAHAKARANAGAR POST BANGALORE-560092

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

153

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, A.G.A FOR R-1) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-E), IN SO FAR AS IT

RELATES TO THE LANDS TO AN EXTENT OF 14 GUNTAS (OUT OF

TOTAL EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 34 GUNTAS) IN SY.NO.43/2 AND TO

AN EXTENT OF 24 GUNTAS (OUT OF TOTAL EXTENT OF 3 ACRES

1 GUNTA) IN SY.NO.44/2 OF AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BELONGING TO

THE PETITIONERS AT SL.NOS.630 AND 632 OF THE SCHEDULE

APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND

GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.56748/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI N. SHIVRAJ S/O NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, B-39, AIR STAFF QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 064 2. SRI G. BALAKRISHNA S/O LATE SRI ANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SPT AIR STAFF QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064 3. SRI SIDDARAMAPPA S/O MALLESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SPT, ALL INDIA RADIO STAFF QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064

154

4. SRI A. MARY JULIANA D/O ANTHU DAS, B-5, ALL INDIA RADIO STAFF QUARTERS, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560094 5. SRI R. MANJUNATH S/O LATE RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, B-36,SPT AIR STAFF QUARTERS, ALL INDIA RADIO YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064 6. SMT. R. AMUDHA DEVI W/O G.B BALAKRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.146, RISALDAR STREET, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE 560020 7. SRI V.S. RAMESH S/O V.N. SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO. 60-B, 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE 8. SRI S. RAVINDRA RAO S/O LATE M. SUBRAMANI RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, B-11, SPT ALL INDIA RADIO QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064 9. SMT. SHAKUNTHALA S/O SRI RACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NO.72, 5TH MAIN, VASANTH NAGAR, HIGH GROUNDS,

BANGALORE 10. SMT.D. NAGARATHNA W/O SRI M.C. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 34, 1ST MAIN, GANGAPPA BLOCK,

155

GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032

11. SRI K.B. GIRISH S/O BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.11, WHITE HOUSE, 13TH CROSS, KAVERI LAYOUT, GM PLAYA, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BANGALORE - 560075

12. SRI M. GOPINATH S/O C. MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO U 454, 6TH CROSS, MSR NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560054 13. SMT. T. KALAVATHY W/O RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.17, PANCHAVATI LAYOUT,

2ND PHASE, SARAIPALYA, THANISANDRA, VIDYA SAGAR, BANGALORE. 14. SRI S. VENI W/O S RAVICHANDAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO. 1288, B BLOCK, VIJANAPUR, DOORAVANI NAGAR, BANGALORE 15. SRI B. GUNASHEKAR

S/O LATE BALAKRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.14, 6TH CROSS, SOCIETY STREET, SWATANTRA NAGAR, SRIRAMAPURAM, BANGALORE - 560021

16. SMT.K.C. RAMANI W/O LATE K.P RAGHAVAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO. 356, SAI KRUPA LAKSHMI

156

8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN, IISC LAYOUT, JRD TATA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560092 17. SRI PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY S/O GANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO BTM 2795 KOLAR MAIN ROAD, BANGARPET 18. SRI RAJAGOPALA REDDY S/O GANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO BTM 2795 KOLAR MAIN ROAD, BANGARPET 19. SRI EZHIL VENU S/O S. VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO. 83, 9TH CROSS, KARAMCHAND LAYOUT, LINGARAJPURAM, BANGALORE 20. MRS. K. RAMANI W/O SRI K.N. SHANKARANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, A TYPE, NO.160, BEML QUARTERS BEML NAGAR PO KGF 21. SRI S.M. THYAGARAJA S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO 32/2, 2ND B MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560020 22. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR

S/O ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BULLHALLI, HAROHALLI POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE

157

23. SRI B.V. GANGADHAR S/O VENKATA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS MRS. B.S. BABY KALA, W/O SRI B.V GANGADHAR, NO.2, ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET, JC NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560006 24. SMT. MANIK BAI W/O GUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, A TYPE, NO.14, BEML QUARATERS, KGF 25. SRI S SATHISH S/O SRI SATHYANARAYANA SETTY Y AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 141/A, NAKSHA"S, 3RD MAIN, 2ND STAGE, AGB LAYOUT, SARASWATHIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560086 26. SMT. ANITHA W/O SHAMU NAIK, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS NO 195, A TYPE, BEML NAGAR POST, KGF 27. SRI. GAJENDRA KUMAR S/O NAGAPPA ROJED, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO. 129, A TYPE, BEML QUARTERS, BEML NAGAR POST, KGF 28. SRI. RAMADAS AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

NO 8, 1ST CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, CHEWADAPPA LAYOUT, K NARAYANAPURA ROAD, HEGDE NAGAR, BANGALORE 560077

158

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H R ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADV) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560020 REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL ALONG WITH SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - L AND FINAL

NOTIFICATION PASSED DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - N

ISSUED BY R-1 AND R-2 AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.57076/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAMESH HERALE S/O SRI LATE NAGAPPA HERALE, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

159

2. SRI GANESH HERALE S/O SRI NAGAPPA HERALE AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 3. SRI UMESH HERALE S/O SRI LATE NAGAPPA HERALE, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS ALL ARE R/O RACHENAHALLI SHAVARAMA KARANTH LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMETN, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K. P. WEST BANGALORE-560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - E THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT LAND IN SURVEY NO. 105/2B [I ACRE 12 GUNTAS] OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.

160

IN W.P.NO.57117/2014: BETWEEN: 1. MR SUBBANNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. MR.CHIKKASUBBANNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. MR.NARASIMHA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 4. MR.RAJANNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 5. MR.HANUMANTHA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 6. MR.MUNIRAJU S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF AMRUTHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BANGALORE-560 094.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE FOR P1, 2, 5 & 6) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

161

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMNT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUHTORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - D THE

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT

LAND IN SURVEY NO. 55/[15 GUNTAS], 47/7 [01 ACRE 32

GUNTAS], 53/3 [01 ACRE 32 GUNTAS], 53/2 [14 GUNTAS], 54[15

GUNTAS] OF LANDS IN DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM

HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.57150/2014: BETWEEN: SMT JEEVANAMMA W/O SRI CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/A SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.N. SHETTY, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.K. SRIVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING

162

BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.N. PUTTE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LAND ACQUISITION PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AS WELL AS FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PROPOSING THE ACQUISITION OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.40/1 MEASURING 5 GUNTAS OUT OF 4 ACRES 37 GUNTAS SITUATED AT SRIRAMPURAM VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TQ., BANGALORE DIST., BELONGS TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN VIDE ANNX-H & K BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57605/2014: BETWEEN: MRS KANTHAMMA W/O SRI V. NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE HEBBAL, BANGALORE - 560024

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D.,

SRI. RAJASHEKAR B KANAVI, SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K., ADVOCATES)

163

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE -560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX -C THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO FAR AS

THE SUBJECTION LAND IN SY. NO. 54 (0 ACRE 23 GUNTAS) OF LAND IN DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57606/2014: BETWEEN: 1. MR. A. G. RAMAKRISHNA S/O GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. MR. A. G. RAGHURAMAIAH

S/O GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE,

164

B.B. ROAD, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 092.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE AND SRI.CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX - C THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECTION LAND IN SY. NO. 47/4 (1 ACRE 8 GUNTAS) OF LAND IN AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 58859/2014

BETWEEN: GOVINDARAJU

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF LATE THIMMAIAH, RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHNKA HOBLI,

165

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTIY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-F DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER TO ISSUE ANN-F, THEN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT ANN-H DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 59794/2014

BETWEEN: SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE JAKKUR POST

166

YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560064

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONER BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - C AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 60012/2014

BETWEEN:

SRI RAMAIAH S/O LATE MUTHURAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1308 RAMAIAH GARDEN VIDYASAGARA, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD DR. SHIVARAMKARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER

167

(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE ENDORSEMENT DROPPING THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.84/7 MEASURING 10 GUNTAS SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK IN TERMS OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 26.10.2011 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 622/2015 BETWEEN: SMT CHANNAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE

K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560018

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND

168

SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.A. ARIGA , ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. FILED IS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - D IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 685/2015

BETWEEN: M. RAJAGOPAL AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE V MUNIVENKATAPPA RESIDING AT NO. 733 PATEL MUNIVENKATAPPA LAYOUT NAGARAVA


(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND

169

SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - E IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 1958/2015

BETWEEN: SMT. P. SHYLAJA W/O LATE SRI. T.A. RENUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.43, 1ST FLOOR, PAPANNA BLOCK, 13TH CORSS, RBI MAIN COLONY ROAD,

GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560024

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. S. SHASHIBHUSHAN, ADVOCATE)

170

AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE )

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH DIRECT THE RESPONDENT /BDA TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S PLIGHT AND TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION BY ALLOTTING AN EQUIVALENT SITE OF THE SAME DEMENSIONS IN THE SAME WITHOUT ANY EXTRA COST AND EXECUTE NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION IN THIS BEHALF WITHIN 7 DAYS AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 2462/2015

BETWEEN: SRI SARDAR AHMED SON OF SRI.K.ABDUL RAHIM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT 23, NANDI VIEW LAYOUT, DINNUR MAIN ROAD, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

171

(LAND ACQUISITION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AS PER ANNX - E AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AS PER ANNX - F IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY; AWARD DATED 08.07.2004 AND AWARD DATED 18.10.2004 AS PER ANNX - G & H; THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS DATED 06.11.2004 AS PER ANNX - J & K RESPECTIVELY BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 4591/2015

BETWEEN: 1. GOVINDAMMA W/O MR RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2. SRINIVAS S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. NAGRAJ S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

4. CHANDRU S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

172

5. YASHODAMMA D/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 6. VENKATESH S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ALL RESIDING AT NO.80, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-77 AND ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER G. SHANTARAJ S/O LATE B. N. GURUMURTHY REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.161, 8TH STREET, BANK AVENUE, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-43.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE FOR P2 - P6 ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001, BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUHTORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.


173

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL ALONG WITH SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - L IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 5228/2015

BETWEEN: MR.P.V.CHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE P V MADHAVAN RESIDING AT #141, BLOCK NO.20 (FORMED IN SURVEY NO.17/1 HENNUR VILLAGE) ARKAVATHI BDA LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 043

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 2. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION T CHOWDAIAH ROAD K. P. WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R. T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R T NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032

174

5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE - 560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R5)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ALLEGED DENOTIFICATION PROCESS OF R-1 DENOTIFYING ESPECIALLY THE PETITIONER PROPERTY MORE FULLY EVIDENT IN ANNX - L DATED 12.11.2013 AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 5664/2015

BETWEEN: 1. SMT BATHULA BEGUM W/O JANAB NUSARATH PASHA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SRI. JANAB NUSRATH PASHA S/O ALIJANABSATTARALIAS BABASAHIB, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.63, PILLANNA GARDEN, 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 045, ALSO RESIDING AT NO.405,

406, NEEKADRI MAHAL APARTMENTS BLOCK, NO.45/6, NANDIDURGA ROAD, BANGALORE.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. SURESH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SRIDHARA D. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001, REPT. BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

175

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BDA, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PRAK WEST, BANGALORE-20.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.N. PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


RESPONDENTS AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE

REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED

15.11.2014 FOR DE-NOTIFICATION OR RE-CONVEYANCE OF THE

PETITIONERS LAND AS PER VIDE ANNX - A & A1 & B TO THIS

WRIT PETITION AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 6735/2015

BETWEEN: SRI GURUPADAPPA NAGAMARPALLI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE SANGANBASAPPA NAGAMARPALLI R/AT NO. 322, SARASWATHI NILAY 3RD MAIN, 5TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R T NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

176

URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE

ANNEX - H AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 6981/2015

BETWEEN: 1. MRS.KUNJAMMA SAMUEL W/O LATE A J SAMUEL, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. MRS. LENY ROY, D/O LATE A J SAMUEL, W/O MR. ROY PHILIP, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.JOSEPH ABRAHAM, S/O MR.ABRAHAM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.306, 7M, 80 FT, ROAD,

177

HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 043.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVLEOPMENT AUTHOIRTY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-0560 020.

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVLEOPMENT AUTHOIRTY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. M. N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS QUASHING THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION

DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & R-3 AS PER ANNEX - G FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & 3 VIDE ANNEX-H AND MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & 3 VIDE ANNEX - J, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND DECLARE THAT THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX - G, H & J HAVE LAPSED AND HAVE BECOME INOPERATIVE IN VIEW OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT NO. 30 OF 2013).

178

IN W.P. NO.7248/2015:

BETWEEN: SRI. MARUTHI BADAVANE NAGAREEKA KSHEMABHIVRUDHI SAMITHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR RAJANNA B. O/AT NO.402, JAGNANESHWARI NILAYA, 9TH CROSS, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASRAHALLI HEBBAL, BANGALORE-24.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESETNED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.N. PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX

- J AND ETC.

179

IN W.P. NO. 7277/2015,

BETWEEN: SRI. MARUTHI BADAVANE NAGAREEKA KSHEMABHIVRUDHI SAMITHI REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR. RAJANNA - B. O/AT NO.402, JAGANANESHWARI NILAYA 9TH CROSS, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-24

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BANGALORE-01 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-20 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-20


THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - K AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 7326/2015,

BETWEEN:

SRI. INNESHAPPA

180

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE CHOWRAPPA R/AT MESTRI PALYA HAMLET VILLAGE, RACHENAHALLI, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY HIS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JUANNES @ JOHN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SON OF LATE Y. CHINNAPPA, RESIDING AT #41, SAI KRUPA APARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, VISHWANATHA NAGENAHALLI, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032.


1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPEMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

181

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - F AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.8277/2015:

BETWEEN: MRS. JETHRONICA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS W/O MR. GABRIEL R/AT NO.89, N.M. REDDY ROAD, MARIYANAPALYA H.A. FARM POST BANGALORE - 560 024. ...PETITIONER

(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, ADVOCATE )


BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.


THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL

182

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY R1 AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.8278/2015:

BETWEEN: 1. SMT AROKIA MARY

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE ALPHONSE RAJ R/AT NO. 138, GARE CHINNAPPA LAYOUT, MARIYANPALAYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.

2. SRI. C. ANTHONYSWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE CHINNAPPA R/AT MARIYANAPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.

3. SRI. A. CHINNAPPA

S/O AROGYAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT MARIYANPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.

4. SRI. K. VENKATESHAPPA S/O T.K. KODANDAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT MARIYANPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.

5. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA

W/O LATE LAWRENCE AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT MARIYANPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE )

183


BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER


…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-E ISSUED BY THE

R-1 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND IN

RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

IN W.P. NO.9135/2015:

BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SYED ZAKRI HUSSAIN

S/O S. RAHAMATUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.9/562, AGADI STREET, AMEENPEER ROAD

CUDDAPAH - 516 001.

2. K.S. DILSHAD BEGUM W/O K.S. RAFIUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.12, 2ND MAIN BYRAPPA

184

LAYOUT, NEAR RASHEEDYA MASJID, GOVINDAPURA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.

3. SRI N.K. RAM MOHAN S/O N.S. KRISHNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NEHA NILAYA, NO.13 SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT, KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.

4. SRI. S. JAI PRASAD

S/O LATE M. SIVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.439, 5TH "B" MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 043.

5. SRI G. CHANDRACHAR

S/O T.H. GANGADHARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.13,NEHA NILAYA, SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT, KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.

6. SMT. LALITHA BAI

W/O A. VEERA RAGHAVALU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, 4TH CROSS, I FLOOR, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 023.

7. SRI RAVINDRA BABY

S/O S. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.814, 10TH "A" AMIN, INDIRA NAGARA, I STAGE,

BENGALURU - 560 038.

185

8. SRI A. RIZAUDEEN S/O ASHRAF ALI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.12, DEFENCY LAYOUT THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BHARAT NAGAR, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077.

9. SRI R.SARAMA BEGUM W/O A. RIAZUDEEN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.12,DEFENCY LAYOUT THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BHARAT NAGAR, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077.

10. SRI C. KALINGAIAH

S/O CHAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO. 247, 12 "A" CROSS, 1ST "B" MAIN ROAD, W.C ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMI PURAM POST, BENGALURU - 560 086.

11. SRI G. SURENDRANATH

S/O LATE K. GOPALA PILLAI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.B-15, KHB LAY OUT, PUTTENAHALLI, YALAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064.

12. SMT. M. VIJAYA KUAMRI

W/O M. DHANA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.48, 2ND MAIN, VIVEKANAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 047.

13. SMT. E. KAMALA MANOGARAN W/O MANOGARAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO 2 FRIENDS LAYOUT, CHANNAPPANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,

186

MARATHAHALLI POST, BENGALURU - 560 037.

14. SMT. MADHURI ADIGA

W/O A.R ASHOK KUMAR ADIGA, AGED ABOUT 48 YFEARS, R/AT NO.288, 3RD "A" CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, W.O.C ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.

15. SMT. V.S. AMARAVENMATHY W/O R. RAMAN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.21/1 DEFENCE LAYOUT, 3RD CROSS, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

16. SRI SYED AHMED

S/O NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.21/2, DEFENCY LAYOUT, 3RD CROSS, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

17. SRI NAVEED AHMED S/O NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.21/2, DEFENCY LAYOUT, 3RD CROSS, THANSANDAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

18. SRI. S KUMAR

S/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.45, 2ND CROSS, SRI SAIBABA NAGAR SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU - 560 021.

19. SRI K KOTHANDARAMAN

S/O V KANNIPPAN AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.NEW NO.38, OLD NO.245 9TH MAIN, MATHIKERE NEW EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 054.

187

20. TAJA PASHA

S/O LAND CHAND PASHA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.23/106/B, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, KUPPASWAMY LAYOUT, NAGAVARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.

21. SMT SEEMA BANU

W/O TAJ PASHA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.23/106/B, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, KUPPASWAMY LAYOUT NAGAVARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.

22. SMT SHANAZ BEGUM

W/O ZAKIR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.58 YEARS, GOVINDAPURA, UMARNAGAR, 4THCROSS, A.C. POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.

23. SMT ZAKIRA BEGUM

W/O LATE JAMSHEED AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.25 3RD CROSS, DEFENCY LAYOUT, NEAR FATHIMA MAJID THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

24. SRI S KRISHNA MURTHY

S/O LATE S SINGARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.3/1, MES QUARTERS, GANGADHARA CHETTY ROAD, SHIVAN CHETTY GARDEN POST, BENGALURU - 560 042.

25. SRI M MAHBOOB ALI

S/O LATE V M MOHAMMED ALI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSONROAD,

188

FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.

26. SRI M AKBER ALI S/O LATE V M MOHAMMED ALI, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSON ROAD, FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.

27. SRI YOUSUF ALI S/O LATE T M MOHAMMED ALI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSON ROAD, FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.

28. SRI EQBAL ALI S/O LATE T M MOHAMMED ALI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSON ROAD, FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.

29. SMT YASMEEN SULTANA

W/O AKHI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.32, 3RD CROSS DEFENCY LAYOUT, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

30. SRI MOHAMMED ABDULLA

W/O S HAMIM AHMED AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.32, 3RD CROSS DEFENCY LAYOUT, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

31. SRI MOHAMMED ZEYAULLA

W/O S HAMIM AHMED, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.32, 3RD CROSS

189

DEFENCY LAYOUT, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

32. SRI. R KANICKRAJ

W/O S RAJENDIRAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.1 TERESA 2ND CROSS, RANGANATHA LAYOUT, MAHADEVAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 048.

33. SRI. K.M.M. ABDUL KADAR

W/O K MOIDIN BEARY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.103, MANASABA PALACE, SULTANPALYA MAIN ROAD, R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 032.

34. SRI. BONDU RAMA SWAMY

W/O MUSALAIAH, AGED ABOUT... YEARS, R/AT N.306, 9TH C MAIN, I CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 046.

35. SRI. I KUMARAN MOOSAD

S/O I RAMAN MOOSAD, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.91, G BLOCK, SAHAKARA NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 092.

36. SRI N K GOPI

S/O N.S. KRISHNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, NEHA NILAYA, SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT,

KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.

190

37. SRI. A SUBRAMANYAM S/O A SESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.33, OFFICERS QUARTERS, BEML NAGAR POST, K.G.F. - 563 115

38. SRI FAIROZ BAIG S/O LATE AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.33, 1ST CROSS D.V. BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.

39. SRI. SHAKEEL SAIT S/O ABDUL RAHMAN SAIT, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.209, 9TH B MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040.

40. SRI MAHAMED AHSWAR

S/O NASEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.S2, S.K. HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR, NO.661, ST MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 032.

41. SRI NOOR JAHAN

S/O NASEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WATCHMAKER, R/AT NO.S2 S.K. HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR NO.661, ST MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 032.

42. SRI ASHOK VARDHAN

S/O SUBEDAR SHAMLAL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.SHYAM HOSPITAL AND

RESEARCH CENTRE, KARHALLI ROAD, BENGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114.

...PETITIONERS

191

(BY SRI. VISHWAJITH SHETTY S, ADV.) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE COMMISSIONER

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 20.

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 20.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2; D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3 ) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF



ANNX-A.

IN W.P. NO.9278/2015:

BETWEEN: 1. SRI M. RAGHUKUMAR

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O LATE C MUNIKRISHNAPPA.

2. SRI. C. MUNIRAJU

S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.

192

3. SRI C. VENKATARAM S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.

4. C. SRINIVASAMURTHY

S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. ALL RESIDING NEAR LAKSHMINARAYNASWAMY TEMPLE SAHAKARANAGAR POST, AMRUTHAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 092.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F ISSUED BY THE

RESPONDENT NO.1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

193

IN W.P. NO.9488/2015:

BETWEEN:

SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O POOJAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS

R/AT NO.104, VIDYASAGAR (SARAI PALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, SRK NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 077,

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA G. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.9576/2015:

BETWEEN:

1 . M GOPAL AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

194

2 . M RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

3 . M UDAYKUMAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 4 . M HARISHKUMAR AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, ALL SONS OF SRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O POOJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.104 VIDYASAGAR (SARAI PALYA)THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, SRK NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560077

…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR

SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


195

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - F IN SO FAR AS

THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC

IN W.P. NO.10923/2015

BETWEEN: SRI D. VENKATA KRISNAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE DASAPPA R/AT NO.627, NEW HOUSING COLONY , I. I. S. C., BANGALORE - 560 012

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - J DATED

18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R -1 AND ETC.

196

IN W.P. NO.11344/2015

BETWEEN: SRI. J.K. JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE J M KRISHNAPPA, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHNAKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. MAHESH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 4 . METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, NO.21, GROUND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 5 . BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX, J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001

…RESPONDENTS

197

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. V.Y. KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4) RESPONDENT NO.5 IS DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2015 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.13201/2015

BETWEEN: 1 . SRI NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA, 2 . SRI.MUNINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE K. SONNAPPA, 3 . SMT.KANAKAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O LATE M.NAGARAJA, ALL ARE RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R PURAM HOBLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 024 4 . SMT. GODHA R AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O SRI RAMAPRASAD NO.691,VISHNUCHITTA, 5TH CROSS,

8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024

198

5 . SMT. S. M. JAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS W/O SRI H. K. RANGANATHAN, RESIDING AT NO.692, SRIRANGADHAMA, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 6 . SRI N. RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS NO.1,5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, POST BANGALORE-560 024. 7 . SRI V. ANANDA SON OF SRI G. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.6, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI,HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 8 . SMT. SOSAMMA THOMAS AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS W/O SRI M. C. THOMAS 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT,DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 9 . SRI GIRIJA B. S. AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS SON OF LATE SREENIVASA MURTHY B. M. NO.4, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT,DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 10 . SRI M. C. ARBRAHAM,

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS SON OF SRI M. L. CHERIAN, NO.2, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,MARUTHI LAYOUT,

199

DASARAHALLI,HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 11 . MRS ELIZABETH ANNA JOHN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS D/O REV. E. C. JOHN NO.5, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 24 12 . SRI ANILA S AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O DR. SURYANARAYANA K NO.3,7,10, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 24 13 . SMT RAMYA SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS W/O SRI ARUN S NO.2, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 560024 REPRESENTED BY HIS SPA HOLDER AND BROTHER IN LAW SRI. ANILA S. AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O DR K. SURYANARAYANA NO.11, NAGAPPA STREET SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 560020 14 . SMT SHASHI KARTHIKEYAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS W/O SRI D KARTHIKEYAN NO.8, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 560024

15 . SRI RAGHUNAND C, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O SRI C. CHIKKANNA NO.9, 5TH CROSS

200

8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 560024.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE- 560001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020


THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - S ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.14944/2015:

BETWEEN: 1 . DR. M. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE SRI. M. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.229, 6TH B MAIN, 10TH CROSS, HMT LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560002

201

2 . SRI. RAJESH KUMAR S/O SRI. SAHJANANDA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.7/2, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560024 3 . LALTI KUMARI W/O SRI. SAHJANANDA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.7/2, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560024 4 . SMT. PREMA V. W/O M.N. NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.3, 1ST CROSS, NEAR SINDHI COLLEGE OUT ROAD, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560024 5 . SRI. SUBBARAMAIAH S/O SRI. D.P. ASHWATHANARAYANAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.2, SRINILAYA, 1ST CROSS,KUVEMPU MAIN ROAD, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-24 6 . AZEEZUNNISA W/O ABDUL KHAYUM AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.6, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MUNISWAMY GOWDER LAYOUT, HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-560024

7 . SMT. KHORESHA KHATOON W/O SRI. H. ANSARI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.16/B,

202

1ST MAIN ,2ND CROSS, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, OPP: SINDHI COLLEGE, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560024 8 . SRI. PONNUSWAMY S/O SRI. MALAYAN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT C/O NARASIMHASWAMY HOUSE, NO.96/1,10TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGARA, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK, GANGANAGARA, BANGALORE-560024 9 . SRI. CHINNU S/O SRI. MALAYAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT C/O NARASIMHASWAMY HOUSE, NO.96/1, 10TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGARA, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK, GANGANAGARA BANGALORE-560024 10 . MR. ALI HUSSAIN KHAN S/O LATE ALIMKHAN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT C/O A.K. WELCOME STORES, NO.2,KEMPAPURA MAIN ROAD, HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560024 11 . SRI. M.N. NARAYANA RAJU S/O SRI. RAMARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.2, KEMPAPURA HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560024 12 . SRI. SOHAN SHARMA S/O SRI. TEJ NARAYAN SHARMA

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.30, BISHEWARA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY LINE, NAGASHETTY HALLI, BANGALORE-560094

203

13 . SRI. RAJAVEL S/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS SECURITY OFFICE OF THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 14 . SRI. B.R. PAPANNA S/O B.P. RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS HOUSE NO.201, 1ST BLOCK, POLICE QUARTERS, BRIYAND SQUIRE, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560002

…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOUDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOUDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BASAVARAJA H.T., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


204

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND

(3) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, DATED 03.02.2003

AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, PRODUCED

AT ANNEXURE -A & ANNEXURE - B PASSED BY R - 2, R-1 IN SO

AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER SITUATED IN SY.NO.28/2

AND SY.NO.28/3, IN KEMPAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.17240/2015:

BETWEEN: 1 . SMT MANJULA W/O LATE H T MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.97 'A' BLOCK HEBBAL H A FARM POST BENGALURU-560024 2 . SMT SHANTHAKUMARI W/O KRISHNA B. M. AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.97 'A' BLOCK HEBBAL H A FARM POST BENGALURU-560024

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. B. AJIT, ADVOCATE AND SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRSENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

205

SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VINAY DEVARAJ, SRI. VIKRAM A. HULIGOL, SRI. M.N. RAAMAJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & 3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONERS

DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN - D AND

ETC.

IN W.P. NO.18814/2015:

BETWEEN: SMT KEMPAMMA W/O. LATE SRI. KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, NO.145,DHANISANDRA VILLAGE, SHIVARAMKARANTH NAGAR POST, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 560077 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. MURALI BABU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT

206

M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, K.P WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRLY.

NOTIFICATION PASSED U/S.17(1) OF THE BANGALORE

DEVELOPMENT ACT 1978 DATED 03.02.2003, AT ANN - B, &

CONSEQUENTLY THE FINAL NOTIFICATION PASSED UNDER

SEC.19(1) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1978

DATED 23.02.2004, AT ANN - C IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S LAND

ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.19213/2015

BETWEEN:

1 . B. M. GANAPATHI S/O B.K.MACHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO.44, MURTHYUN NELLAYA 11TH CROSS, ATMANANDA COLONY R.T.NAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-32. 2 . JACOB MATHEW

S/O N.J. MATHEW AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, NO.22, VINAYAKANAGAR, SADARAMMA LAYOUT, (NEAR RAILWAY TRACK

207

GEDDALAHALLI) KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 3 . A.THOMAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O A ARICASWAMY NO.38, VINAYAKANAGAR, SHARADAMMA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 4 . N.PURUSHOTHAM S/O NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.43, VINAYAKANAGAR, SHARADAMMA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 5 . KUMAR VELAN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O MANI, NO.4, VINAYAKA NAGAR, SHARADAMMA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 6 . SHARADAMMA W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY E.LALITHA, W/O SRI.JAYASHANKARA REDDY, R/AT NO.1, GEDDAHALLI VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

7 . E.NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O MUNIREDDY, R/AT NO.9, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,

208

K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 8 . R.M.ASLAM AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O LATE ABDUL RAHIMAN, R/AT NO.10, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 9 . MRS. AVRIL PATRICK AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, W/O MR.PATRICK, R/AT NO.17, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

10 . A.SHARADAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O N.RAMAMURTHY, R/AT NO.18 & 19, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,

K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

11 . ANNIE MATHEW AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O MR.MATHEW KUTTY, R/AT NO.28, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

12 . A.SUBBAREDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O PEDAPPA REDDY, R/AT NO.29, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

13 . SUBBAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

RANGAREDDY, R/AT NO.32, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

209

14 . G.KODANDA RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O MR.BODI REDDY, R/AT NO.36 & 37, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

4 . THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMITTEE BBMP HEAD OFFICE, J.C.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001


SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - Z AND ETC IN W.P. NO.20191/2015:

BETWEEN:

SOCIETY OF DAUGHTERS OF

210

ST. CAMILLUS A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIEITES REGISTRATION ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: HENNUR MAIN ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGLAORE-560 043, R/BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SISTER ANILA KOMPUTHUKIL AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAYOGI B HALLUR, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . BANGALORE DEVLEOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVLEOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 27.06.1978 ISSUED BY R - 2 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 20.07.1978 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.24417/2015:

BETWEEN: 1 . SMT.MUNIMARAMMA

211

AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, W/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA,. (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2 . SRI C. SRIRAMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA 3 . C. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA 4 . C. PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, ALL RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 064

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 4 . THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX,

212

J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - H WITH THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.24418/2015

BETWEEN: 1 . SRI.C.SRIRAMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, 2 . C. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, 3 . C. PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, ALL RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILALGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING,

BANGALORE-506 001. 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

213

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4 . METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, NO.21, GROUND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 5 . BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX, J. C. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 RESPONDENT NO.5 DELETED AS PER ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 12/03/2018) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - L WITH THE WRIT PETITION. (II) QUASH THE BULK ALLOTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2007 ISSUED BY THE R -2 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX - G AS WELL AS THE APPROVAL OF THE R -1 DATED 19.12.2003 VIDE ANNX - E AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.28143/2015:

BETWEEN: 1 . MR.KEWAL KISHAN SETH

S/O LATE BAVANDAS SETH, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS

214

2 . MRS. PURNIMA SETH W/O MR. KEWAL K SETH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 3 . MR. VIRESH SETH, S/O MR. KEWAL K SETH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4 . MR. NITESH SETH S/O MR. KEWAL K. SETH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, ALL THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERSONS ARE RESIDENTS OF RICHARDSTRAFFE, 54-56, 22081 HAMBURG, GERMANY. REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.GYAN SINGH BIST S/O GHEENA SINGH BIST, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.4410, 4TH FLOOR, HIGHPOINT IV, 45 PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001

...PETITIONERS (BY SMT. GEETHA MENON, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

215

…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA R1; SRI. K. KRISNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE

RESPONDENTS IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS

MENTIONED AT SL.NO.9 AND 10 THEREIN ARE CONCERNED

VIDE ANN - A AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.28673/2015 BETWEEN: SHRI M.N. THYAGARAJ S/O LATE V.S.NARAYANA SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.5, 1 MAIN, 6TH CROSS, MARUTHI EXTENSION, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, SRIRAMPURAM, BENGALURU-560021.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

216

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND

RESPONDENT 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID

DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE

COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE

REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING

REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - N & P

RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY.

IN W.P. NO.28676/2015

BETWEEN: SMT A. C. SHOBHA RANI W/O G. CHANNAKESHAVA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.2753, 'E' BLOCK, SHAHAKARA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 092.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

217

KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT & APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - P AND Q RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.28679/2015

BETWEEN: SHRI P. B. AMRUNATHA PANICKER S/O MR. P.KL. BAHULEYAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT C/O K. RAJAGOPAL, NO.302, BANASHANKARI, CORAL NO.20, 2ND CROSS,M.M. LAYOUT, K.B. SANDRA, R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADV.) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

218

2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M B PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 )


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND R-1

& 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE

HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE

APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN

(2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE

PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE- L & M RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED

THROUGH HIS SOCIETY.

IN W.P. NO.29317/2015:

BETWEEN: SMT. RADHAMMA W/O S. N. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.108, SRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, SAMPIGE HALLI, JAKKUR POST,

YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 064

...PETITIONER

219

(BY SRI. Y. S. VEDHUKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-01 2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 & R4)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED

20.01.2015 VIDE ANNX - A AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.29541/2015:

BETWEEN:

1 . SRI K. S. VITALAKSHA S/O SRI MUDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.80, 6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, WORK LAYOUT, SHANKARNAGAR, BANGLAORE-560 096.

220

2 . SRI K. P. ANANDA, S/O SRI K. M. PRABHAKARA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.645, BAPUJI COLONY, KENGERI POST, BANGALORE-506 060.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE )

AND:

1 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

2 . THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-3 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE NO. 71, SITUATED AT BLOCK -7, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, IN FAVOUR OF P-1 AND SITE NO. 829, SITUATED AT BLOCK -11, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT IN FAVOUR P -2 AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PUT THE PETITIONERS IN POSSESSION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE SITES AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.30781/2015:

BETWEEN: 1 . SRI BACHAPPA S/O LATE MARIYAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, R/AT NO.172, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560077

SINCE DECEASED BY LR'S

1(a). SMT. MARIYAMMA

221

W/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS 1(b). SRI. B. KRISHNAPPA S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED 52 YEARS 1(c). SRI. B. CHANDRAPPA S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED 52 YEARS 1(d). SRI. B. NARAYANSWAMY S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 1(e). SRI. B. MANJUNATH S/O.LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 1(f). SRI. B. RAMANJI S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED 43 YEARS SL.NO. 1(a) to 1(f) ARE R/AT NO. 172, NEAR B.B.M.P OFFICE TANISANDRA S.R.K. NAGAR POST BANGALORE- 77

1(g). SMT. GAYATRIYAMMA @ GAYATRI D/O. LATE BACHAPPA W/O. G.A. GANGADHAR GOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT. GANTAGARA CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA

1(h). KUMARI CHANDRAKALA D/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT. NO. 172, NEAR B.B.M.P. OFFICE TANISANDRA, S.R.K. NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 77

...PETITIONERS

222

(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE) AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.

2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF SECOND FINAL

DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE

ANNEX - L TO THE W.P. AND TO DECLARE THE SCHEME

FORMULATED BY THE BDA UNDER THE NAME CALLED

"ARKAVATHI LAYOUT" AS LAPSED IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S

LAND IS CONCERNED AND QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED

11.03.2015 ONE ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEX - J TO THE

W.P.

IN W.P. NO.31794/2015:

BETWEEN: 1 . SRI. M. MAHENDRA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MARAPPA,

223

2 . SRI M RAJAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O MARAPPA, 3 . SMT AMMAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O RAMAIAH, 4 . SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIBELLAPPA, 5 . SRI MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O LATE POOJARI CHIKKANNA, 6 . SMT GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O LATE SONNAPPA 7 . SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O A. M. MUNEGOWDA, 8 . SRI AMBARISH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA, 9 . SRI RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O MARAPPA, 10 . SRI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIBELLAPPA 11 . SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE PILLAPPA, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DASARAHALLI,

K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 024

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND

224

SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN

- E IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER AND THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO. 32423/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MOHAMMED HEMANI S/O LATE MOHAMMED ALI HEMANI , AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SRI. PYAR ALI HEMANI S/O LATE MOHAMMED ALI HEMANI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.70, CHIKKA BAZAR CROSS,

225

TASKAR TOWN, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560051

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R -1 VIDE ANNX - G IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT LAND IN SY.NO.46/4 MEASURING 1.00 ACRE OF LAND OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ., BANGALORE AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33127/ 2015: BETWEEN:

SMT SUSHEELAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH, RESIDING AT SRI. VINAYAKA NILAYA

226

LAKSHMINARAYANASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, AMRUTHAHALLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560092

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST,

BANGALORE - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-3 VIDE ANNEX - G IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33128/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI. TOTADA MUNIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST,

227

BANGALORE 560092 (SR.CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE - 560020 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE -560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSERL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - F AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33131/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA, 2. SRI. KALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 064

228


AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

BANGALORE - 560020 ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - H AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 33133/ 2015:

BETWEEN:

SRI B. K. SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

S/O SRI B. KENCHAPPA, RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560064


AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

229

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX

- F AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 33134/ 2015:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O KONEERAPPA, 2. SRI K. MANJUNATH S/O KONEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 064

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

230

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560020




NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE

DATED 28.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - G AND

ETC.

IN W.P NO. 33137/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI. A. SATHYANARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,

SON OF LATE CHIKKAPPAIAH, RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560077 (SR. CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

231

URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX -

F AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 35055/ 2015: BETWEEN: SMT. NAGARATHNA W/O LATE SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.104, 3RD CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BANGALORE-560 080

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-3

232

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE NO.830 SITUATED AT BLOCK -11, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PUT THE PETITIONER IN POSSESSION ON HER SITE AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 35464/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE N.K.APPAYANNA, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI.N.J.MURTHY, S/O SRI. M. A. JAYARAMAIAH, 47 YEARS NO.B302, KRISHNA DIAMOND APARTMENTS, A-BLOCK, SAHAKARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560092. (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-01. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

233

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020.


THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 35465/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DESIKACHAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYACHAR R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 2. SRI. PADMANABHACHAR, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYACHAR R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BOTH REPRESENTED BY M/S POOJA BUILDERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA


AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.


234

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3))



NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER IS

CONCERNED VIDE ANN - F AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 35842/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI L RAJANNA S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT RACHENAHALLI SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 080 SENIOR CITZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

235

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE - 560020



NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONERS

DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN - M AND

ETC.

IN W.P NO. 37412/ 2015:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. MARIAMMA KOSHY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O LATE M KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077

2. SHRI BINOJ KOSHY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O M. KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077 SERVING AS LT. COL. IN THE INDIAN ARMY CAMP, GANDHIANGAR, GUJARAT-382 042 3. SHRI BIJU KOSHY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE M. KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077

236

4. MRS. BIJI RONALD GEORGE AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D/O LATE M KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077 PETITIONER NOS. 2 TO 4 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SMT. MARIAMMA KOSHY (FIRST PETITIONER)

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. V. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE AND SRI. P.S. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE -560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH RAOD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIKRAM HUILGAL , ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.07.2015 AT ANNEXURE - S ISSUED BY

THE R -3 AND ETC.

237

IN W.P NO. 40838/ 2015:

BETWEEN:

SRI S. SHESHACHAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, SON OF LATE SRINIVASACHAR, RESIDING AT #57, RACHENAHALLI, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560077. SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED.


AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX -

E AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 44088/ 2015:

BETWEEN:

MR. SADATHULLA KHAN

238

S/O LATE B. PEER KHAN NO.59/3, 6TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, PILLAPPA BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. VICTOR MANOHARAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (UDD) VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, K.P. WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO GRANT AN ALTERNATIVE SITE TOWARDS ACQUISITION FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OF HIS SITE NO.7 FALLING IN SY NO.97/1 SITUATED AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, FORTHWITH AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 45662/ 2015:

BETWEEN: K. V. BACHIREDDY S/O LATE V. VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

239

NO.52/1, 7TH MAIN ROAD, THIMMAREDDY ROAD, APPAREDDYPALYA INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 038

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (NORTH DIVISION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R - 1 DATED 04.04.2014 AT ANNEX - G TO THE W.P. AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 47015/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT RADHA RUKMINI

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O LATE G. CHINNAPPA, R/AT K-7, (48/1), RUKMINI BUILDING, 3RD MAIN, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURAM, SRIRAMPURAM, BANGALORE-560 021 SR CITIZEN NOT CLAIM 2. SRI. VENKATAPPA

240

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O DODDAVEEERANAGAPPA, RESIDING AT KACHALLI, TUBUGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIM 3. SRI. M. RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O M. N. MANCHAPPA, R/AT NO.423, 4TH MAIN, GANIGARA PETE, DODDABALLAPUR, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, SR CITIZEN NOT CLAIM PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY SMT. RADHA RUKMINI

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020


241

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION OF THE R -1 DATED 31.07.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 47820/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI. M. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O SRI. M. RAMARAJU, R/AT NO. 6/1, I FLOOR, KHM BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032 REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI.TEJRAJ GULECHA S/O LATE PUKHRAJ GULECHA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO. 9/1, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025. SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

242

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE



ISSUING R-1 ANNEXURE -F AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 47821/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALAPPA, 2. SRI SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALAPPA 3. SRI. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALAPPA, 4. SRI. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH 5. SMT. SHOBA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, D/O LATE RAMAIAH 6. SRI. RAGHU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH,

7. SRI. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH,

243

8. SRI. SUJENDRA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH, ALL ARE RESIDING AT TANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. RAMESHKUMAR GULECHA S/O PUKHRAJ GULECHA, MAJOR, NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 )

244

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 47822/ 2015:

BETWEEN:

SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O A.M. SURYANARAYANAGOWDA R/AT NO.308, 4TH B CROSS, HRBR LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK, KALYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY M/S MANYATA INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD., NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. TEJRAJ GULECHA

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT Y BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.

245

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 WHICH IS

ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.

IN W.P NO. 47823/ 2015:

BETWEEN: SMT. SUBHA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O RAVIKUMAR R/AT NO.16, VANIVILAS ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE-560 004 REPRESENTED BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA S/O. MR PUKHRAJ GULECHA MAJOR, NO.9/1, I FLOOR CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD BANGALORE-560 025

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

246

URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 )

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.47824/2015:

BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMI SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D/O B.A. SRINIVAS GUPTA, R/AT NO. 16, VANIVILAS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004 REPRESENTED BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA S/O MR. PUKHRAJ GULECHA, MAJOR, NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)

247


BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITHY

BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020

3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.47825/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI R. ADINARAYANA

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)

2. SRI. R. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)

3. SRI. R. BASAVARAJU

248

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)

4. SRI. R. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) ALL RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001


BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020


THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - C AND ETC.

249

IN W.P. NO.47826/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT V. JAYALAKSHMI

AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS D/O VENKATAPPA SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED

2. SRI. PADMANABHACHARYA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANATHARAYA @ GUNDAPPA SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED

3. SRI. DESIKACHAR AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANATHARAYA SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED ALL RESIDING AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWR OF ATTORNEY M/S POOJA BUILDERS, NO.86, 2ND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009 BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. TEJARAJ GULECHA



BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

250

AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD,

BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE RAOD, BANGALORE-20

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - F AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.47827/2015: BETWEEN: SRI C. DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA R/AT RACHENAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 001.

251

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020.


THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.49842/2015:

BETWEEN:

SRI. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA R/AT TANISANDRA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, S. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.


BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST,

252

PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.


BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.


THE BANGALOARE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.49843/2015: BETWEEN: SRI BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE APPAYANNA R/AT TANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING,

253

DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.56271/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. N. RAJU

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O P. NARAYANASWAMY R/AT NO.95, HORAMAVU AGARA, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043.

2. SMT. TEJASWINI

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, W/O SRI. N. RAJU R/AT NO.95, HORAMAVU AGARA HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043.

...PETITIONERS


254


BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.57432/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. GOVINDASWAMY

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O MUNISWAMAPPA

2. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O B.H.C. MUNEGOWDA BOTH ARE RESIDING AT

K.NARAYANAPURA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK

...PETITIONERS

255

(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001


BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560028


THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560028

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.57434/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. S. RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O H. SUBBANNA (LATE) RESIDING AT

K. NARAYANAPURA K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.


256

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.57438/2015:

BETWEEN: SMT. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O KRISHNAPPA RESIDING AT THANISANDRA

K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK


257


BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001


BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020


THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.57439/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, S/O LATE SONAPPA R/AT THANISANDRA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE.


AND:


258

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST,

PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.57992/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. CHINNAPPA S/O. ENESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT MESTRIPALYA, KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE-560 001.

259

2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-F AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.59004/2015: BETWEEN: MUNIRAMAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR SRI. SUBRAMANI, S/O. LATE MUNIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT: SRIRAMPURA, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE, SRI. ARVIND C. DESAI, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REP BY ITS

260

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1)

OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEXURE - C ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED UNDER

SECTION 19(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEXURE - D ISSUED BY

THE R-1 AND RE- MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014

U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY THE

R -1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY CONCERNED AS

LAPSED IN TERMS OF SECTION 24 OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR

COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION

REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.59486/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT R. SHOBHA

W/O. VENKATARAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2. SMT. R. NIRMALA

261

W/O. SRI JAYARAJU N. AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SMT R. PREMAKUMARI W/O. SRI P. ASHWATHANARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4. SMT. R. SHEELA RANI W/O SRI. L. NARENDRA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 5. SMT. R. SUDHA W/O SRI JAYARAJU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 6. SMT R. ROOPA W/O SRI RAVI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

ALL ARE R/AT: NO. 390, J. R. LAYOUT 1ST MAIN ROAD CHELIKERE KALYANANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 043.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 01 REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS

262

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL AND SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION U/S. 17[1] & [3] DATED 03.02.2003, PUBLISHED IN

THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS

LAND BEARING SY.NO.5 MEASURING 21 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT

VIDE ANNEX - E ISSUED BY R-1 AND QUASH THE FINAL

NOTIFICATION U/S 19[1] DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE

GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS

LAND BEARING SY.NO.5 MEASURING 21 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT

VIDE ANNEX - G ISSUED BY R -1.

IN W.P. NO.59492/2015: BETWEEN: HANUMA REDDY S/O LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT CHELLAKERE PALLOTI NILAYA KALYAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560043

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 01 REPTD. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER

263

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) DATED 03.02.2003

PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF

THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING NO. 4/1 MEASURING 14

GUNTAS PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE - D. (II) QUASH THE FINAL

NOTIFICATION U/S 19(1) DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE

GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS

LAND BEARING NO. 4/1 MEASURING 14 GUNTAS PRODUCED

VIDE ANNEXURE - F.

IN W.P. NO.59495/2015: BETWEEN:

1. SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. SRI S. PRAKASH S/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 3. SRI S. ANIL REDDY S/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 4. SMT. S.AMARAVATHI

264

W/O A. SURESH KUMAR, D/O LATE P.SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT: CHELLAKERE VILLAGE KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE -1. REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) OF BDA ACT DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY.NO.4/2 MEASURING 23 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - G ISSUED BY R-1. (II) QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION U/S 19(1) OF BDA ACT DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY.NO.4/2 MEASURING 23 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - J ISSUED BY R-1.

IN W.P. NO.742/2016:

BETWEEN:

265

SMT. K. N. SHOBHA W/O. KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.93/A, THEJAS NILAYA, 5TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR,A BANGALORE-560 010.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-4 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. M. B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SITE CANCELLATION ORDER DATED 02.07.2008 [ANNEX - E] IN RESPECT OF SITE NO. 780, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BLOCK - X, BANGALORE AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.751/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI B. H. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE B. HANUMANTHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.119, UTI BANK RAC, 80 FEET ROAD, 7TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095

...PETITIONER

266

(BY SRI. MURALIDHAR H. M., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

2. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. K. A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2)


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT TO ALLOT, REGISTER AND PUT THE PETITIONER IN PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF A SITE MEASURING 30 X 40 FEET IN BLOCK - V, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BANGALORE IN LIEU OF SITE NO. 184/E WHICH WAS ALLOTTED AND REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.

IN W.P. NO.2392/2016: BETWEEN:

MR. JOKIM AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O SRI. ANNAYAPPA R/AT NO.198, CHURCH BLOCK, VISHWANATHANAGENAHALLI R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFFI, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING &

267

URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX - F AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.2397/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. A. RUDRAPPA S/O ANJINAPPA, AGD ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.73, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, HEBBAL FARM POST, BANGALORE-560024

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTRMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REP BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001

268

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 17(1)

OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNX-B & FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED

23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-2 U/S 19(1) OF BDA ACT VIDE

ANNX -C AND RE- MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014

ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT, VIDE ANNX-M

IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY BEARING

SY.NO.28/1 MEASURING 20 GUNTAS OF KEMPAPURA VILLAGE IS

CONCERNED AS LAPSED COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY

IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT

ACT, 2013 AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.2915/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. H. GANGANNA S/O LATE HANUMANTHA AGED AOBUT 62 YEARS R/O NO.110,

2ND MAIN, KAREKALLU, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BASAVESWARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 079

269

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. LAKSHMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISISONER

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.C OUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE REPRESENTATIONS VIDE ANNEX - J TO J5 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5417/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. C. SRIRAMA S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. SRI. C. SRINIVAS S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SRI. C. PAPANNA S/O. LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE.

4. BHARAT SEVASHRAM SANGHA A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT XXI OF 1860 NO.211,RASH BEHARI AVENUE,

270

KOLKATTA-70019(W.B) BRANCH AT NO.118/2, AMRUTHAHALLI, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY SWAMI SIVAPREMANANDA AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF BHARAT SEVASHRAM SANGHA NO.118/2,AMRUTHAHALLI, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. H. R. ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANA SOUDA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NO.7,T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NO.7,T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020 4. THE METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT ROOM NO.1,GROUND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 5. THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX,

271

J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE - K1 AND QUASH THE BULK ALLOTMENT ORDER DATED 21.10.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2 WHICH IS ANNEXED AS ANNEXURE - H1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5446/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. P. DHANALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, (BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) R/O SRI.LAKSHMINARAYANA, NO.1292, 8TH MAIN ROAD, WEST OF CORD ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560086. SINCE DECEASED BY LRS SMT. T.H. VANISHREE W/O. T.S. HARINATH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/A NO: 563, IST MAIN ROAD NAGENDRA BLOCK, BANASHANKARI IST STAGE BENGALURU.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. RAJAGOPAL M. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

272

2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-II BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED RESOLUTION DATED 23.09.2015 PASSED IN SUBJECT NO. 115/2015 BY THE RESPONDENT BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AT ANNX - G AND THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.10.2015 ISSUED BY R-1 AT ANNEX - H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5448/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE K ADINARAYANA GOWDA 58 YEARS, R/A HOUSE NO.1, SY.NO.20/1 JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANAKA ROAD BANGALORE NORTH(ADDL), TALUK BANGALORE-560 064

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAJANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

273

SL.NOS 2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF THE BDA T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU -560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. PAVITHRA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -A ACQUIRING LAND

OF THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO.709 BEARING SY.NO.20/1 OF

JAKKUR MEASURING 0.22 GUNTAS AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.6717/2016: BETWEEN: SRI D. V. CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O D. V. VEERANNA R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 038

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

274

BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 4. V. SHIVAREDDY S/O. K.S. VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO. 51/5, 6TH MAIN 13TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003 5. S.S. SRINIVAS RAO S/O. PROF S.L. SEETHARAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT FLATNO. 301 'PALASHA RESIDENCE' #26, IX CROSS, IV MAIN MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560003

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL AND SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. ASHOK HARNAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. MANJUNATH K.V., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THAT THE FINAL


ANNEXURE - C IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS

CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.6718/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. SATISH

275

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O D. V. NARAYANASWAMY R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE K. R. PURAM HOBLI - 560038 BANGALORE EAST TALUK

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 4. V. SHIVAREDDY S/O. K.S. VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO. 51/5, 6TH MAIN 13TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003 5. S.S. SRINIVAS RAO S/O. PROF S.L. SEETHARAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT FLATNO. 301 'PALASHA RESIDENCE' #26, IX CROSS, IV MAIN MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560003

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3

276

SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE



ANNEXURE - C ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE


IN W.P.NO.10318/2016: BETWEEN: MR.SWAMY GOWDA S/O LATE CHELUVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 634/19, 6TH MAIN ROAD SHIVAJI MAHARAJA ROAD BHAVANI NAGAR, K G NAGAR BANGALORE-560019

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. JEEVAN K., ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHAOWDAYYA ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A. D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


RESPONDENT TO COMPLETE THE CONVEYANCE IN PURSUANCE

OF THE ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 24.06.2006 AT ANNEX - B IN

RESPECT OF SITE NO. 834 ALLOTED TO THE PETITIONER AT

BLOCK V OF ARKAVATHY LAYOUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW

AND ETC.

277

IN W.P.NO.11295/2016: BETWEEN: C. R. SHIVASHANKAR S/O SRI. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO.457, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS, IDEAL HOMES LAYOUT, RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 098

...PETITIONER (BY SMT. LEELA KRISHNAN D., ADVOCATE) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BDA COMPLEX, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-20 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PAVITHRA A RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO REGISTER SCHEDULE SITE BEARING NO. 1494, 7TH BLOCK, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, ALLOTTED TO HIM UNDER ANNEXURE - A OR TO ALLOT HIM A SUITABLE ALTERNATE SITE MEASURING 15 MTRS X 24 MTRS INANY OF ITS LAYOUTS AND REGISTER THE SAME EXPEDIOUSLY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.11493/2016: BETWEEN: 1. ANTHONYSWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE AROGYAPPA SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED 2. A. JOSEPH

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE AROGYAPPA SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED BOTH RESIDING AT NO.158,

278

M. M. REDDY ROAD MARIYANNAPALYA H. A. FARM POST BANGALORE-560 024

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMETN MULTISTORIED BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 & 2 TO

FORTHWITH CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION OF R - 3

DATED 27.03.2013 AT ANNEX - B AND EXCLUDE THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.11844/2016:

BETWEEN:

SMT. SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS WIFE OF LATE SHAMANNA RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE

279

YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560004 (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTRISTORIED BUILDING B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - C IN SO FAR AS

THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.11846/2016: BETWEEN: SRI BACHANNA

AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, SON OF LATE MARINANJAPPA RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,

280

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560064 (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - C IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.12010/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. CHIKKANNAPPA S/O CHIKKAHANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS DODDATUMAKUR VILLAGE & POPST,

DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

281

(BY SRI. T.N. VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK PART WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REFUND EXCESS AMOUNT COLLECTED FROM THE PETITIONER WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 18% FROM THE DATE OF DEPOSIT TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.12674/2016: BETWEEN: MRS. JHANSI RANI AKKIRAJU W/O SIV PRASAD AKKI RAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO.201, HOUSE NO.274, 8TH MAIN ROAD, BEML LAYOUT, THUBARAHALLI BANGALORE-68

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. REUBEN JACOB, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

282

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-20 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SACHIN B. S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2, FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 BOTH ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNX - C, D & G TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR AS THE LAND IN SY.NO.38/1 OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH ADDL. TQ., BENGALURU DISTRICT MEASURING 1 ACRE 35 GUNTAS IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.13637/2016:

BETWEEN:

SMT. R. SHAKUNTHALA W/O T.R.NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.4, 7TH A MAIN ROAD, MUTHYALANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 074

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. T. N. VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE) AND: BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK (WEST) BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

283

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. C. R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR ALLOTMENT OF SITE IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14280/2016: BETWEEN: SRI R. DAYANAND REDDY S/O. LATE. V. RAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 17, 8TH CROSS, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, K. K. HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 084

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGAMESH R. B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGLAORE- 01, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 20

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED WHICH IS BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER ( ANNEXURE -G) AND ETC.

284

IN W.P.NO.14649/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O. LATE. JAYARAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE 01. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY. NO. 12/2 MEASURING 16 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT

VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND ETC.

285

IN W.P.NO.14650/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAIAH S/O. LATE. CHIKKA THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 01. REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020


THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY. NO. 12/2 MEASURING 29 GUNTAS EXCLUDING 5 GUNTAS OF KHARAB PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND ETC.

286

IN W.P.NO.15833/2016: BETWEEN: SRI KADAMPULLY SUKUMARAN KARTHIK AGE:50 YEARS SON OF SRI. KADAMPULLY APPU SUKUMARAN RESIDINT AT VILLA 36, LIFESTYLE, IVC ROAD, DEVANAHALLI - 562 110 BANGALORE EARLIER RESIDENT OF WII/247, THEVAR MADAM ROAD, CHOWANNUR, KUNNAMKULAM THRISSUR - 680 503 KERALA

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH S. ARBATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D .N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - G DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.

287

IN W.P.NO.19019/2016: BETWEEN: SRI BHARATH KUMAR N S/O SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/A NO.78, K NARAYANAPURA ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE--560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY

NOTIFICATION DTD 3.2.2013 PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED AND ETC.,

288

IN W.P.NO.19020/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. BHARATH KUMAR N S/O SRI. NARAYANAPPA, AGE 26 YEARS, R/AT NO.78, K.NARAYANAPURA, ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD, SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD 3.2.2003 PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS

CONCERNED AND ETC.,

289

IN W.P.NO.23623/2016: BETWEEN 1. R. M. ANBUMANI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O K. R. MASILAMANI, NO.19, III CROSS, III STAGE, III PHASE, VTH BLOCK, BANASHANAKARI, BANGALORE - 560 085. 2. M. G. SUBRAMANIAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O M.R. GOPALAKRISHNAN, SAM TOWERS,C-2, II FLOOR, NO.22, RAJU STREET, CHENNAI - 600023. 3. A. RAMALINGAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O R. ANNAMALAI, R/AT S-4, KALAPATHARU APARTMENT, 51, VELLALAR STREET, ADAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 088. 4. HERAMBA KARTHIK. B, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O LATE R. BALASUBRAMANIAN R/AT FLAT NO.102, SCION ARCH APARTMENTS, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, MAIN ROAD, C. V. RAMAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 093. 5. S. JAYARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O SRI. G. SRINIVASAN, R/AT C/O JAGADISH, NO.4/1, OLD NO.34, II FLOOR,

VI CROSS, SMB COLONY, MATHIKERE, BRINDAVANNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 054

290

6. V. K. VERMA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O P. P. SHRIVSTAVA, NO.20, MANU MANDIR, WORLI HILL ESTATE, WORLI, MUMBAI-400 018. 7. K. R. SRINIVASAN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O. K.R.R. AIYANGAR, NO.22, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD PHASE, J P NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078. 8. S. ILANGO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O T. M. SHANMUGAM, R/AT NO. 2472, 15TH CROSS, 27TH MAIN, HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-1, BANGALORE-560 102. 9. MEENAKSHI JAGADEESA. N, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE JAGADEESAN, R/AT NO.716, 7TH A MAIN, H.R.B.R.1ST BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 043. 10. SARASWATHI VAITHIANATHAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS W/O R. VAITHIANATHAN, A-204,SEA FLAMA, DOSTI FLAMINGO, 2ND FLOOR, T. J. ROAD, SEWREE, MUMBAI - 400 015. 11. K. V. S. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE K. S. VISHWANATH NO.301, PALACE VIEW APARTMENTS

14, JAYAMAHAL MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 046 12. H. ROHINESH

291

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O K. SUBBAIAH 34, AMIT TATA SOCIETY, MURARI GHAG MARG, PRABHADEVI, MUMBAI - 400 025 13. M.H.P. ACHAR, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O M. S. HANUMANTH ACHAR, R/AT NO.320, 5TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, N.R.COLONY, BANGALORE-560 019 14. B. KANNAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O SRI. M. BALGURUMURTHY, R/AT C/O KAMAL KISHORE, NO.704, 8TH CROSS, INDIRANAGAR, II STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 038. 15. K. V. VENKATESHA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O K. VASUDEVA RAO, R/AT NO.G-1, LAKSHMANA KRUPA APARTMENTS, NO.23, EAST ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004. 16. G. DAMODARAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O A. P. GOVINDARAJ R/AT NO.24, SHAMANNA LANE, CHURCH ROAD, MURUGESH PALYA, BANGALORE - 560 017. 17. NITIN SETH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

S/O LATE S. L. SETH, R/AT NO.146, JALVAU VIHAR, KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, H.R.B.R. LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 084.

292

18. V. SUNDRESH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE A.P.V.RAO, NO.1555/C,16TH A MAIN, J.P. NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 032. 19. ASURI SRINIVASAN RANGAN, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NO.10, 5TH CROSS, M. R. GARDENS, V NAGENAHALLI, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032. 20. S. RENGARAJAN, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O G. SRINIVASAN, R/AT C/O PRAKASH RENGARAJAN, NO.1091, SOBHA PRIMROSE, SARAJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD, BELLANDUR, BANGALORE-560 103. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. N. DINESH RAO, ADVOCATE ) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE ) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONER IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT

CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONBALE TIME AND ETC.,

293

IN W.P.NO.23643/2016: BETWEEN: 1. V. F. BANAJI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O FARROKI DADI BANAJI C/O R M ANBUMANI R/AT INLAND EVER GLADES, APARTMENTS, NO 121, 1ST FLOOR, 'B' BLOCK, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA DASARHALLI MAIN ROAD HA FARM POST DASARHALLI POST BANGALORE - 560 024. 2. A VIDYA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O C S BALAKRISHNAN FLAT NO 4, SATHYAM APARTMENTS 18, II MAIN R A PURAM CHENNAI - 600 028 3. T A REVATHI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O SRI T K ANANTHA SAYANAM R/AT FLAT NO 405-E S S ENVIRONS CHELEKERE, K R PURAM HOBLI KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 043 4. MANI RAMAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNASWAMY RAMAN, R/AT NO 2581, 17TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, II STAGE INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 008 5. P SHASHIKANTH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O SRI P GOVIND RAO

R/AT NO 20, KRISHNA KUNJ JALADARSHINI LAYOUT MATHIKERE POST, BANGALORE - 560 054.

294

6. VENKAT SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O A P V RAO NO 2, 8TH CROSS (266/11) 3RD MAIN, HANUMANTHA NAGAR MUMBAI - 560 019. 7. Y CHANDRASEKHAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O T V Y RAMAN, C/O V SUNDARESH, NO 1555/C 16TH 'A' MAIN J P NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 078. 8. BANSILAL DHAR AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O DR PREMNATH DHAR R/AT HOUSE NO 1746, SECTOR 28, FARIDABAD - 121 008. (HARYANA) 9. ANU SETH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O NITHIN SETH R/AT FLAT NO 315, RMV CLUSTERS PHASE I RMV EXTN II STAGE BANGALORE - 560 094. 10. V R HERKAL AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O R B HERKAL R/O FLAT NO C-403 AVON MAJESTY, DATTAPADA ROAD BORIVALI (EAST) MUMBAI - 400 066. 11. M S JAVEED HAFEEZ AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

S/O DR M A HAFEES R/AT PALM SPRINGS, NO 6, G 01, 16TH MAIN,

295

7TH CROSS, 4TH B BLOCK KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 560 005. 12. GAYATHRI RANGARAJAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O RANGARAJAN R/AT FLAT NO 302 III FLOOR SWATHI APARTMENTS, V MAIN DEFENCE COLONY INDIRA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 039. 13 . S SHANKAR PRASED AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O S M SEETHARAMAIAH, R/AT NO 79 SHANKAR MUTT COMPOUND CHIKKANNA GARDEN 2ND CROSS, SHANKARAPURAM BANGALORE - 560 004. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N, ADVOCATE ) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE ) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE

RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE

PETITIONER IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT

CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT

TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS

WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC.,

296

IN W.P.NO.23656/2016: BETWEEN: A N PRAKASH RAO AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O A NARAYAN RAO R/AT NO.598, 11TH CROSS, J P NAGAR PHASE-III, BANGALORE-560 078. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHRORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SPECIAL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DTD. 2.12.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-L. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO.70-C, KHATHA NO.142/70-C, CARVED OUT OF SY.NO.81/2B OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.24322/2016:

BETWEEN: 1. MR D O BERGER S/O A. E. BERGER, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,

297

(SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED) R/AT NO.4/668, P & T COLONY, RAMACHANDRANAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANDHRA PRADESH PIN:515 801, NOW CAMP AT BANGALORE. 2. MRS. BEVERLY MARY BERGER W/O H.D.BERGER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.611B, RAILWAY QUARTERS, ARAVINDNAGAR, GUNTAKAL, A.P. PIN:515 801. NOW CAMP AT BANGALORE. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SREENIVASAMURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA, HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

298

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-H DTD.18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANNEXURE-H AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.24676/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY.R AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560043. 2. SMT. YASHODAMMA W/O LATE NAGENDRA. R AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 043. 3. SMT. SUGUNA W/O LATE MUNIRAJU.R AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 043. 4. SHANKAR REDDY S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT

CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560043.

299

5. RAJA REDDY S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560043. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. K BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-1. REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 BDA AND ITS OFFICIALS FROM IN ANY WAY INTERFERING OR FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONERS FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERY SINCE THE SAME HAS NOT BEEN ACQUIRED FOR ITS ANY SCHEMES INCLUDING THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI

LAYOUT AND ETC.,

300

IN W.P.NO.24919/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.C. HEMANNA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045 2. SRI H BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O T C HEMANNA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045. 3. SRI T C CHINNASWAMY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKANNA, R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045 4. SRI C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O T C CHINNSWAMY R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001

301

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4. SMT NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS W/O LATE D KRISHNA, R/AT NO.1/1, ALUR CROSS, MAKALI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE-562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. NARAYANAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT I.E. ANNEXURE-G IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS IN SY.NO.80/1 OF THE THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ., MEASURING 1 ACRE 17 GUNTAS. IN W.P.NO.25131/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SHRI G K RAMEGOWDA S/O SHRI. KRISHNE GOWDA

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.95, 1ST CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-43. ...PETITIONER

302

(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-01 REP BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE- 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITON FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION DTD 18.06.2014, AS PER ANNEXURE-H, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.25132/2016: BETWEEN: SHRI G K RAMEGOWDA S/O SHRI KRISHNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.95, 1ST CROSS 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 043. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE)

303

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-H IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.30680/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. HUCHAPPA B AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, SON OF LATE BILLIYAPPA RESIDING AT NO.40/2/14 OPP CHBS LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560 040


304

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.33181/2016: BETWEEN: SRI J MUNNAGAPPA S/O LATE B JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO 96 B NAGASANDRA YAMALUR POST BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. GIRISHA N. R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY

305

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-1 KARNATAKA. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE- 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONS, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD:3.2.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD:23.2.2004 WITH REGARD TO ACQUISITION OF PETITIONERS LANDS BEARING SY NO.16/10A THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK AND DROP THE SAME FROM THE ACQUISTION UNDER THE SAID NOTIFICATIONS, CONSEQUENTLY RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PETITIONERS SITES THEREIN WITHOUT TAKING DUE RECOURSE OF LAW AND ETC.,

IN W.P.NO.33196/2016:

BETWEEN: 1. SRI. LOKANANDA NAIDU S/O LATE B RADHAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1197/C, 22ND A CROSS, 23RD MAIN, BSK 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070. 2. SRI. B R CHANDRASHEKAR S/O. LATE B RADHAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 195, 13TH CROSS,

306

HIG COLONY, RMV 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 092.

3. SMT. P ANITHA D/O ANJANEY NAIDU,

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT NO. 11-67-1, N.G.O.

COLONY, PUTTUR - 577 583 CHITTUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANGADI S. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BDA, KUMARA PARK, BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BDA, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. …RESPONDENTS


SRI. H.T. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD18.6.2014 (ANNEXURE-F) IN SO FOR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED. IN W.P.NO.33279/2016: BETWEEN: MR MOHAMMED MUZZAMIL SON OF MOHAMMED YOUSUFF AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

NO.8, 5TH CROSS, MUNIMARAPPA GARDEN J. C. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 046

REPRESENTED BY HIS DULY CONSTITUTED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER

307

MR. MOHAMMED YOUSUFF SON OF MOHAMMED AHMED ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. KAMAL M G S., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA VEEDHI DR AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DR T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR,AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-2 AT ANNEXURE-A AND AFTER GOING THROUGH THE PROPRIETY OR OTHERWISE OF ISSUING THE SAME PASS ORDER/S ISSUE WRIT/S SETTING ASIDE/QUASH THE SAME TO THE EXTENT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS SPECIFIED AT SL.NO.1096 OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE SAID NOTIFICATION; AND ETC.,

IN W.P.NO.33385/2016:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

308

RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 2. SRI N RAJA S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 3. SRI SIDDARAJU S/O LATE MALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 4. SRI MUNINANJAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 5. SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077.

6. SRI CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA),

309

THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANASOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.M. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K.N. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SECOND FINAL DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DTD:18.6.2014 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-K TO THE WRIT PETITION IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER PROPERTY WHICH IS MOREFULLY DESCRIBED AT THE SCHEDULE AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.34348/2016:

BETWEEN: ANJENAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

310

R/AT A PORTION OF THE SY.NO 84/4, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAPEGOWDA B., ADVOCATE & SRI. DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHAIRMAN BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE & SRI. K.R. SREENIVASA PARAVARDHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL

BUILDING OF THE PETITIONER AS SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE AND ETC.,

IN W.P.NO.35687/2016: BETWEEN

1. SMT. AMARAVATHI WIFE OF LATE M NAGESHAA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 224, 1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA TEMPLE B CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

2. CHI VISWNATH GOWDA N SON OF LATE M NAGESHAA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS (REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND

311

LEGAL GUARDIAN SMT AMARAVATHI) RESIDING AT NO 224, 1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA TEMPLE B CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 3. CHI HEMANTHA GOWDA SON OF LATE M NAGESHAA AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS (REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND LEGAL GUARDIAN SMT AMARAVATHI) RESIDING AT NO 224, 1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA TEMPLE B CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER K.P. WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 2. SPECIAL ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K P WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. DEPUTY SECRETARY - 1 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K P WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 4. SRI G NAGARAJ SON OF LATE GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 10/25 4TH CROSS ROAD,

BANASWADI M S NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 033.

312

5. SRI B R S KUMAR SON OF SRI RAJASHEKARAIH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 1105 "SANJEEVINI" 10TH MAIN ROAD RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA BANGALORE - 560040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF R-1 TO 3 IN THE MATTER OF ALLOTMENT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF LATE SRI. ERANNA VIDE ALLOTMENT LETTER NO.477/2014-15 DATED 16.09.2014 AT ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.35851/2016: BETWEEN 1. SRI J DEVARAJ S/O. LATE. J M JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, GOVT SCHOOL ROAD, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, BENGALURU 560 064. 2. SRI. J. MUNISWAMY GOWDA S/O. LATE. J M JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, GOVT SCHOOL ROAD, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, BENGALURU- 560 064.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJANNA K., ADVOCATE)

AND:


313

REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER SI.NOS.2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH, (SANKEY) ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGLAURU- 560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SI.NOS. 2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,T. CHOWDAIAH, (SANKEY) ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGLAURU- 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD:18.6.2014 AS AT ANNEXURE-A IN

SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONERS DEVELOPED

SCHEDULE LAND OF SYNO.20/9 MEASURING 0.21 GUNTA OF

JAKKUR NOTIFIED AS AT SL NO.711 IN PAGE 37 OF THE

NOTIFICATION AND ETC.,

IN W.P.NO.36525/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI H D NANJE GOWDA S/O LATE DODDAGULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 41/1 HENNUR MARUTHI LAYOUT 10TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN,

314

KALYAN NAGAR POST , BENGALURU - 560 043. 2. SRI H M RAMESH S/O LATE MUNNE GOWDA @ MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT 9, 'SRI MARUTHI ARCADE', HENNUR MARUTHI LAYOUT , 9TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS KALYAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 043. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 01. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SECOND FINAL DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DTD:18.6.2014 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-J TO THE WP IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER PROPERTY WHICH IS MOREFULLY DESCRIBED AT THE SHCEDULE AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.37682/2016:

BETWEEN 1. SRI. SATHISH

315

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O LATE D V NARAYANASWAMY, R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 021. 2. SRI RAJESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O LATE D V NARAYANASWAMY, R/AT DASARAHALLI, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560021. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE R2 & R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-G; AND ETC.,

316

IN W.P.NO.38430/2016: BETWEEN 1. SRI A MUTHU S/O LATE ARMUGAM AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 44, KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2 THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 2. SMT SHANTHI W/O A MUTHU AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 44 KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2 THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 3. MR MAHROOQ ABBASIA W/O S A KHALID AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 43, KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2 THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 4. MR AZEEZULLA KHAN S/O AMANULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 39, KHATHA NO.1060, THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK

BANGALORE. 5. SMT ABIDA BEGUM W/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ AHMED AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

317

R/AT NO 197, 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS, TUBA LAYOUT THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIDHANASOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONS, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-G SIMILARLY FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-G1; AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.38919/2016:

BETWEEN 1. SMT HANUMAKKA W/O LATE KEMPANNA

318

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, BENGALURU-560 064. 2. SMT.K.R.LALITHA W/O K.RAJANNA, AGED 56 YEARS, R/AT SANJEEVINI, #15, SAMPIGE ROAD, 4TH CROSS, MALLESWARA, BENGALURU-560 003. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJANNA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DEVELOPMENT, 4TH FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, SI.2 & 3 ARE AT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

NOTIFICATION DT:18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-A NOTIFIED AT

SL.NO.697 IN PAGE 36 IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE

319

SCHEDULE LAND OF SY.NO.11/10 OF JAKKUR TO AN EXTENT

OF 0.14 TUNTA SITUATE ON NORTH-WEST CORNER OF ENTIRE

LAND; AND ETC.,

IN W.P.NO.39001/2016: BETWEEN MRS. HAMEEDA SHARIFF W/O MR.FAYAZ SHERIFF, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.17, DAVIS HABITAT, DAVIS ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005. DEAD BY LR' S NAZEEM BABU D/O.FAYAZ SHERIFF AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS NO.10, 515 CROSS PILLANNA GARDEN IST STAGE BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE- 560 084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.C. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS

320

(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;) SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND


NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-E

DTD:18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS

UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT AND ETC.,

IN W.P.NO.40151/2016: BETWEEN 1. P.S. POOVAMMA D/O LATE P.M.SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O NO.24, KURUMARADIKERE, CHITRADURGA TQ AND DIST-577 501. 2. SRIMATI PONNAMMA (SAMPI) W/O P.M.SUBBAIAH (SERIAL NO.6260863), AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, SINCE NOT HOLDING MEMORIES SHE IS REPRESENTED BY HER DAUGHTER PETITIONER NO.1 HEREIN ABOVE R/O NO.7, 5TH CROSS, ATHMANANDA COLONY, SULTAN PALYA, R.T.NAGARA POST, BANGALORE-560 032. ...PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

321

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P.WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, NEXT TO CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560 009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK, NEAR BMTC BUS DEPOT DIESEL SHED ROAD, KRISHNARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE-560 016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4; SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE AND SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION FOR ALLOTMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVE SITE FOR THE ACQUISTION BY THE RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-F DTD:11.07.2016 AND FURTHER DIRECT TO ALOT THE ALTERNATIVE SIDE IN THE SAME LOCALITY OF SY.NO.97 OF RACHANAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE FOR THE SITE NO.119 MEASURING 50X30 AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.40240/2016: BETWEEN M/S KIRLOSKAR SYSTEMS LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS M/S KIRLOSKAR ASEA LTD.,)

A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 # 08, 7TH FLOOR EMBASSY STAR, 8 PALACE ROAD, VASANTNAGAR, BANGALORE - 52 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

322

MR. S. BALAKRISHNA S/O LATE K SATYANARAYANA. ...PETITONER (BY SRI. MAHESH S., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (UDD) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 01. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK - WEST

BANGALORE - 20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER (NORTH). 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (NORTH) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK - WEST, BANGALORE - 20. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER AND TO EXCLUDE THE PETITIONER SAID PROPERTY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.41753/2016:

BETWEEN SMT ANI P RAI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, W/O PURUSHOTHAM RAO,

323

R/AT NO.008 DS MAX SHELTON, NGEF LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, MALLATHALLI, BANGALORE-560056. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUNITHA H SINGH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. REPTD BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010)7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-N SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY; AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.44127/2016:

BETWEEN: M/S GRACE GARDEN APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION (A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER

324

THE KSR ACT) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GRACE GARDEN APARTMENTS 3RD CROSS, HENNUR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 043 BY ITS PRESIDENT.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. BYREGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KP WEST, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KP WEST, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR

SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. M. V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DEMAND THE PETITIONER ASSOCIATION TO SELL ITS LAND AT THE COMPENSATION DETERMINED BY ITS UNILATERALLY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.44146/2016: BETWEEN:

1. COLONEL K. RAMACHANDRAN S/O. LATE. KARUNAKARAN, AGE 70 YEARS, R/AT NO. 3/7, FIELD MARSHAL CARIAPPA COLONY, CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 001 2. V. N. SHAMSUNDAR S/O. V. S. NATARAJAN, AGE 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 189-H,

325

M.G. COLONY RAILWAY QUARTERS, OKALIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 023 3. MAJOR SADASHIVAN K A S/O. LATE. SHANMUGAN, AGE 68 YEARS, R/AT NO. W-7, OLD HAIG LINES, DEVLALI CAMP, DISTRICT NASIK, PINCODE: 422401 4. RAJEEV GOLLARAHALLI S/O. G. K. RAMAN, AGE 50 YEARS, R/AT NO. 4/3, 17TH CROSS, WEST PARK ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560055 5. JYOTHI SINGH W/O. LT. COLONEL MRIGENDRA SINGH, AGE 59 YEARS, R/AT M95, 7TH MAIN, SECTOR 10, JEEVAN BHIMA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 075 6. SHEELA SIMON D/O LATE. KOCHAMMA NAIR, AGE 59 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1456,SUSHANTH, FATIMA STREET, KAMANAHALLI JVV MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560084 7. MULKY DAMODAR KAMATH S/O. LATE. M. PURUSHOTHAM KAMATH, AGE 66 YEARS, R/AT NO. 139, 'UTTAM' AECS LAYOUT,

SANJAYANAGAR RMV II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560094

326

8. PRASHANTH V S/O. L. VENKOBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO. 17, VYSYA BANK COLONY, SARAKKI MAIN ROAD, J. P. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560078 9. RAMESH BABU S/O. R. SONGUKRISHNASWAMY, AGE 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 138/123, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, M.S. RAMAIAH NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560094 10. DHRUVAKANTH B. SHENOY S/O. MR. T. B. G. SHENOY, AGE 52 YEARS, R/AT NO. 153/1, PURNIMA, AECS LAYOUT, D. RAJAGOPAL ROD, SANJAYNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 094 11. ABHA PATHAK W/O. DR. PATHAK, AGE 38 YEARS, R/AT NO. 28, SHEETAL NAGAR, SHAHANOORWADI, AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA- 4310012

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMAD AYUB ALI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,

DEPARTMENT OF MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001

327

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 001 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, REVENUE BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE - F) ISSUED BY

THE R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004

ANNEXURE - G AND ALSO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED

18.06.2014 ANNEXURE - M ISSUED BY THE R-1 IS SO FAR AS IT

RELATES TO SITE NO. 17, 50.51, 52, 57, 58, 59, 48, 49, 31, 15

BELONGING THE PETITIONERS FORMED IN SYNO. 38/1, 38/2 ,

38/3, 38/4, 38/5 AND 39/3 OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,

K.R.PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.44246/2016: BETWEEN: 1. MRS. ALLAIYA

@ ALLAIA JEELANI W/O MR. TAHIR IMRAN D/O. SHABBER AHMED JEELANI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO.4/2 1ST CROSS, ANNIPURA OFF DOUBLE ROAD SUDHAMA NAGAR BENGALURU-560027

328

2. MR. MUSTAFA MOHIUDDIN JEELANI S/O SHABBER AHMED JEELANI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO.530 12TH CROSS, DOLLARS COLONY R.M.V 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560094

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. BALARAJ A. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BDA, KUMARA PARK BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. PAVITHRA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX - J IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.46319/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. R. B. SATHYANARAYANA SINGH S/O. LATE SRI. R. BYRAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.42, 10TH A CROSS, KAVI RAGHAVANKA ROAD, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 050. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH T. S., ADVOCATE)

329

AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO EXECUTE AND REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF ANY RESIDENTIAL SITE IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BENGALURU AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 47314/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/A K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, BBMP WARD # 25, KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DIST BENGALURU - 560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJANNA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN, KURUMAPARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

330

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003, 23.02.2004 AND 18.06.2014

AS AT ANNEX- A, B & C NOTIFIED AT SL.NO. 50 OF PAGE 108 OF

ANNEX - A IN OS FAR IT RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE LAND OF

SY.NO.22/1 OF K NARAYANAPURA TO AN EXTENT OF 1.23 ACRE

IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO. 47461/2016: BETWEEN: PRASANNA P. L. N. S/O. PUTTA REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1679, 6TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN, HAMPINAGARA, BANGALORE-560 104. REPTD. BY ITS G.P.A. HOLDER, PUTTA REVANNA, S/O. LATE SIDDAIAH.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADINARAYAN, ADVOCATE)

331

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. REPT. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. M/S. TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO.17, 1ST FLOOR YAMUNA BAI ROAD, MADHAVANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 001. REPT. BY ITS PRESIDENT.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI.B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO

ALLOT THE SITE TO THE PETITIONER MEASURING 40' X 60'

FORMED IN SY.NO.17, 18. 19/1 & 31/1 OF VENKATESHPURA

AND SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE

NORTH TALUK BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS OF

THE PETITIONER WHICH ARE AT ANNEX - A & M AND ETC.

332

IN W.P.NO.51143/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI. M. C. MAHESWARAPPA AGED 57 YEARS, SON OF SRI.CHENNAVEERAPPA,

NO.54, 5TH CROSS & 6TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, GEDDALHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-77

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS

333

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


ACQUISITITON PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND SY.NO.31/1 GEDDALAHALLI

VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,

INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION

DATED 18.06.2914(ANNEXURE - L) IS ILLEGAL WITHOUT

JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON- EST AND HENCE IN -

OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.51144/2016: BETWEEN: SMT G. B. RATHNAMMA AGED 56 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI.B.SHIVALINGAPPA, NO.71,1ST MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT

334

DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1

GEDDAHALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE

EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ( ANNEXURE - H) IS ILLEGAL

WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRATY AND NON-EST AND HENCE

IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

335

IN W.P.NO.51145/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. M. S. DEVAKI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.78, 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/2, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST

TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J ISSUED BY R-1 IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON- EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

336

IN W.P.NO.51147/2016: BETWEEN: SMT M. C. RUDRAMMA AGED 49 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI.G.S.HALAPPA, NBO.55, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, GEDDALHALLI, K.NARAYANPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS


SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

337

IN W.P.NO.51352/2016: BETWEEN: MR. K. KUBENDRAN AGED 59 YEARS, SON OF MR. K. KALIMUTHU RESIDING AT NO.89 & 90 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. PAVITRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDLAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,

338

INCLUDED AT SL.NO. 251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX- H ISSUED BY R-1 IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.51353/2016: BETWEEN: SRI VAREED GEORGE AGED 46 YEARS SON OF C. V. GEORGE NO.65 2ND MAIN ROAD GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

339

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51355/2016: BETWEEN: SMT S. SAVARIAMMAL AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, W/O SRI A. LUCAS, NO.98, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

340

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51597/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. K. G. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. THIPPESWAMY, RESIDING AT NO.53, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND

ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

341

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51707/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI A. BALARAJ AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE AROKIASWAMY NO.18, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077 2. SMT SALVIUS SUJATHA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS W/O MR. GIFT IMMANUEL RAJ NO.18, IST MAIN 2ND CROSS GEDDALAHALI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077 3. SRI MATHEWS MANOJ AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS S/O SRI A BALARAJ NO.18, 1ST MAIN 2NDCROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST

BANGALORE-560077 ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)

342

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE



PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1,

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST

TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-K) IS ILLEGAL,

WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE

IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.51730/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

343

2. SRI KANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 3. RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 4. SRI GANGADHARAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ALL SONS OF LATE NARAYANAPPA RESIDING AT NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 007

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE



ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.

344

IN W.P.NO.51875 /2016: BETWEEN: SRI. E. SHANKARAPPA AGED 63 YEARS, SON OF ESHWARAPPA.S NO.81, IST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALSWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

345

IN W.P.NO.51876 /2016: BETWEEN: SMT. ALICE MARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O SRI VICTOR, NO.97, 2ND MAIN, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL

346

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51877/2016: BETWEEN: SRI K. V. VENKATA REDDY AGED 65 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA, NO.70, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,

347

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51878/2016: BETWEEN: DR. RUMANA RIYAZ AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, WIFE OF DR. SHAHID AHMED SHAIKH, NO.80, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

348

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.52141/2016:

BETWEEN:

SRI. SHAFEEQ AHMED S/O LATE SRI.T.R. ABDUL SUBHAN SAB AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT, A.N. MANSION, 1ST FLOOR, NO.15,

7TH "A" CROSS, KANNAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KARNATAKA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEELOPMENT AUTHORITY MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001.


349

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - C AND DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-B IS RESPECT OF AFOREMENTIONED LAND BEARING SITE NO. 7, IN SY.NO.34/8, SITUATED AT THUBA LAYOUT, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.52142/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. ATHEEQUE AHMED S/O. LATE. SRI. T.R. ABDUL SUBHAN SAB, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT A. N. MANSION, 1ST FLOOR, NO. 15, 7TH-A-CROSS, KANNAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE -560 001 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

350

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - B AND DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - C IS RESPECT OF AFOREMENTIONED LAND BEARING SITE NO.7, IN SY.NO.34/8, SITUATED AT THUBA LAYOUT, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.52928/2016: BETWEEN: SRI DENNIS JACOB MAJOR, SON OF LT. SUNNY JACOB (RETD.) NO.20, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

351

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53240/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SONNAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, W/O LATE MUNINANJAPPA, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036 2. SRI. D. C. KUMARA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAMMA, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036 3. SRI D. R. SHIVANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE M. RAMAIAH, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036 4. SRI. A. MUNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDAANJANAPPA

R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036

352

5. SRI T. N. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT TARABANAHALLI, H CROSS, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H IN SO FAR AS


IN W.P.NO.53525/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. VIJAYAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, SON OF SRI.RAVANNUI NAIR, NO.15, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,

353

K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53526/2016: BETWEEN:

SMT. VIMALA AGED ABOUR 49 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI.B.S.DINESH KUMAR, NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,

354

7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAM DEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE



PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT (ANNEXURE - J) IS

ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST

AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

355

IN W.P.NO.53527/2016: BETWEEN: MRS. MARY KUTTY MAMMEN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O MR THOMAS MAMMEN NO.25, 1ST MAIN 2ND & 3RD CROSS GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT (ANNEXURE - M) IS

356

ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53670/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. LOURDU MARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. FRANCIS, NO.91, 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL

357

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54364/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S. SRIKANTA S/O LATE SRI SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED R/AT NO.307, 9TH 'A' CROSS, JAKKUR-YELAHANKA MAIN ROAD, JAKKUR VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE-560 064 2. SMT. SAVITHRI W/O SRI. S. SRIKANTA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED RESIDING AT NO.307, 9TH 'A' CROSS, JAKKUR-YELAHANKA MAIN ROAD, JAKKUR VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE-560 064

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER SANKEY ROAD,

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

358

SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DATED 06.09.2016 AND 23.09.2016 PASSED BY THE R-3 AS PER ANNEXURE - A & B AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54790/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. KEMPANNA S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.30/3 AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BANGALORE-560 092

...PETITIONER (BY SMT. M. D. ANURADHA URS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REP BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA,

BANGALORE-560 001 4. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD

359

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. I. G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR RR2 & R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO ACQUIRE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND GRANT REASONABLE COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.55126/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. S. N. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA R/AT NO.27 SAMPIGEHALLI YELAHANKA HOBLI JAKKUR POST BANGALORE-560 064

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

360

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-D ISSUED BY R-1 IN

SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.55667/2016: BETWEEN: SRI S. G. JAYADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF SRI. S.GANGA SETTY, NO.82, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER


361

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE






NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEXURE - J] IS

ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST

AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.55737/2016: BETWEEN: 1. R. PARASHURAM REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O S. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, R/AT NO.A-146, ANUGRAHA NILAYA, 9TH CROSS, KHB COLONY, SARASWATHIPURAM, CHITRADURGA-577501 2. SAMPATH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, SON OF GANGAPPA, NO.246, 16TH BLOCK, SMIG-A, 4TH PHASE, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560064 3. SMT.ANURUDHA S M AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O SUBRAMANAYA SHARMA T.V., R/AT NO.344, 16TH A MAIN,

362

4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560041 4. K.G.POONACHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O K.S.GANAPATHI R/AT UARTER NO.G.1114 4TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN, CENTER TOWNSHIP, HAL, BANGALORE-570037 5. A.K.LOGANATHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O K.KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.2BM, 326, OMBR LAYOUT, BHUVANAGIRI, BANGALORE-560043 6. G.HARISH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O C.GOWDA CHITHAPPA R/AT NO.3087, 14TH B MAIN ROAD, 8TH 'C' CROSS ROAD, HAMPINAGAR, BANGALORE-560040 7. P.P.SATHYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE P.M.PEMMAIAH R/AT NO.321-8, (206/3A), DEVAKI NILAYA, 7TH B CROSS, 3RD MAIN, JAKKASANDRA, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560034 8. K.D.NANJE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDASHANAIAH R/AT NO.927, 1ST BLOCK, II STAGE, 2ND 'A' CROSS ROAD, BASAVESHWARANAGAR,

BANGALORE-560079 9. M.NANDISH MURTHY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE D.C.MALLARADHYA

363

R/AT NO.20, 1ST CROSS ROAD, ANUBHAVANAGAR, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560072. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001

REPT BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -N DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56022/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. MAJELLA THOMAS AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS WIFE OF SRI. SIBY XAVIER NO. 24, 1ST MAIN, 2ND & 3RD CROSS GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)

364

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE






NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- G] IS ILLEGAL,

WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND

HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.56023/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. MAJELLA C. THOMAS AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI SIBY XAVIER

365

NO.24, 1ST MAIN 2ND & 3RD CROSS GEDDALAHALLI, K NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE






NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- J] IS ILLEGAL,



366

IN W.P.NO.56971/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. P. SRINATH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O SRI C. PERIASWAMY, NO.85,1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE

ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- J] IS ILLEGAL,

367

WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56972/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. FAYAZ KHAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O. SRI. YASEEN KHAN, NO. 48,2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL

368

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57149/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. R. SHYLAJA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS WIFE OF SRI. C.S. RAJENDRA NO. 38, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,

369

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57151/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. NEELAMMA KUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O SRI K A KUTTAPPA, NO.9, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, GEDDALAHALLI, K NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

370

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57709/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. A APPANNA S/O LATE ANJIANAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS 2. SRI MUNEGOWDA S/O A. APPANNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 3. SRI A. SATHISH S/O APPAIANNA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 4. SRI. R. ANAND S/O LATE A RAMESH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 5. SRI R HARISH S/O LATE A RAMESH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA TOWN BANGALORE NORTH TALUK PIN - 560 032

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P.M., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA

371

BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020



SCHEME KNOWN AS 'ARKAVATHI LAYOUT' IN RESPECT OF LAND

BEARING SY.NO.63/1 MEASURING 28 GUNTAS SITUATED AT

JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH

TALUK, NOTIFIED BY PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED

IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.03.2003 AND PART -III

NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNEXURE - C OF THE R-2 AND FINAL

NOTIFICATION IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 18.06.2014,

IN PART III VIDE BEARING NO. 380 NOTIFICATION DATED

08.12.2014, AS PER ANNEX - K HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION

27 OF BDA ACT AND; GRANT CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF/S

THERETO AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.57937/2016: BETWEEN: DR. M. T. RAJA REDDY S/O LATE MALLESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS

372

RESIDING AT NO 602, 2ND MAIN, KALYAN NAGAR, 2ND BLOCK BANGALORE - 560043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. CLIFTON D ROZARIO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020 3. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 [ PLACED AS ANNEXURE -W] INSOFAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER MEASURING 37 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.31/1, SITUATED AT CHELKERE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK AND ALL CONSEQUENT ACTIONS THERETO, INCLUDING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R-1 [PLACED AS ANNEXURE - X] AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.58218/2016: BETWEEN:

SMT. ANITHA SURYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI M. SURYA KUMAR NO.27, 2ND MAIN, 5TH CROSS,

373

GEDDALAHALLI VILALGE K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE






NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- K IS ILLEGAL,



374

IN W.P.NO.58222/2016: BETWEEN: MR. SHAIK MAROOF NADEEM AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, SON OF MR.MOHAMMED SHUJATHULLA NO.43, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILALGE K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.M. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

375

IN W.P.NO.58734/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANITHA B. N. AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O. CHANNAPPA, R/AT NO. 20,12TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN,YELLAMMA TEMPLE STREET, SRINIVASA NAGAR, BANGALORE 560050 2. V. S. CHINCHOLI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. LATE. SANGRAMAPPA, NO. 69,SUGUMA LAYOUT, NYANAPPANAHALLI, BEGUR POST, BANGALORE - 560068 3. SHAMAIAH L., AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O. LATE. LAKSHMAIAH, R/AT NO. 106/2, 7TH CROSS ROAD, NANJA REDDY COLONY, H.A.L. POST, BANGALORE - 560017 4. SMT. S. SANGEETHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O. K A SAHADEV RAO, R/AT 12/7-1, SRI. MOUNAGURU MATTA ROAD, THIMMAIAH GARDEN, DODDIGUNTE, COX TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 005 5. S T JAGANNATHA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O. S D THAMMANNA, R/AT NO. 17,

SRI. RANGADHAMA, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, SINGAPUR LAYOUT, VIDYARANDAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560097

376

6. SMT. SUMANGALA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, D/O. LATE. B G CHIKKAVENKATAIAH, R/AT 3977 A, 1ST FLOOR,3RD MAIN, 18TH CROSS, K.R. ROAD, K.S.K. II STAGE, BANGALORE- 560070 7. MANJUNATH R. AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O. LATE. RATHNAM, R/AT NO. 68, 4TH CROSS, BRINDAVAN LAYOUT, VIJINAPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 016 8. SMT. ASHA D AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O. DEVA RAO V, R/AT NO. 42, 1ST FLOOR, II MAIN, 2ND CROSS, M. N. BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032 9. JAYARAMA H C AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O. B V CHELUVARAYASWAMY, R/AT NO. 327, HONGELAKSHMI NILAYA, 3RD MAIN, VHBS LAYOUT, NEAR GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 040

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGLAORE 560001. REP BY ITS SECRETARY

377

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020

….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - M DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59166/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHINNAPPA NO.64, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T. CHOWDIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

378

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE- K] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59168/2016: BETWEEN: SRI M. V. RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. SRI. M. VENKATARAMANA REDDY, NO. 4, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

379

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59317/2016: BETWEEN: 1. V SHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S/O LATE B M VEERAIAH R/AT UTI, BAN RAC NO.119, 80 FT ROAD 7TH BLOCK, KORMANGALA BANGALORE-560 095 2. V SUNDAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE S V RAMAN NO.1758 3RD CROSS RAM MOHANPUAM SRIRAMPURAM POST BANGALORE-560 021 3. M TUKARAM NAYAK

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE M NARAYAN NAYAK R/AT NO.18 1ST C MAIN 5TH D CROSS

380

CHOKKALAPPA LAYOUT KASTURINAGAR BANGALORE-560 043 4. SRINIVASAN T V AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE T M VAIKUNTAPPA R/AT 2235 4TH MAIN ROAD 4TH CROSS ROAD RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE BANGALORE-560 040 5. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA N AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE NANJAPPA R/AT NO.8 SHANTHISADANA 1ST FLOOR 4TH MAIN SHIVANAGARA BANGALORE-560 010 6. K S CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS D/O LATE SIDDAIAH R/AT NO.42 11TH CORSS 2ND MAIN PRASHANTH NAGAR BANGALORE-560 040 7. S R GOPALACHAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O LATE S M RAMACHANDRACHAR R/AT NO.63, 4TH MAIN SARVABHOUMA NAGAR CHIKKALASANDRA BANGALORE-560 061

8. V CHANDRASEKARAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE G VENKATESAN R/AT NO.162 BEML LAYOUT

381

KAMALANAGAR BANGALORE-560 079 9. T K VALSALAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE C ACHUTHAN R/AT NO.A , 422 II STAGE,3RD PHASE 2ND B CROSS ROAD 5TH MAIN DOMLUR VILLAGE BANGALORE-560 071 10. JAVANT G BHATIA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDJI N BHATIA R/AT NO.S007 KRISHNA GREEN APARTMENT KRISHNA TEMPLE ROAD DODDABOMMASANDRA BANGALORE-560 097 11. J V GURU MURTHY AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O LATE J VENKATARAYAPPA R/AT NO.11, 8TH CROSS BASAVESHWARALAYOUT BEML III STAGE RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BANGALORE-560 098

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVLEOPMENT M S BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPTD.BY ITS COMMISSIONER

382

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -P DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59793/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. M LEO S/O C MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT H.A. FARM, MARIYANNA PALYA, BANGALORE-560024 2. M RAVINDRA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O C MARIYAPPA, R/AT H.A.FARM,MARIYANNA PALYA, BENGALURU-560024 3. M ANTHONY REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O C MARIYAPPA, R/AT H.A.FARM,MARIYANNA PALYA, BENGALURU-560024

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAGHUPATHY T N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP BY SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001

383

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 REP BY ITS SOMMISSIONER

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HULIGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARRE THAT THE NOTICE DATED 06.09.2016 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY THE R-2 IS ILLEGAL AND QUASH THE SAME AND ETC IN W.P.NO.60064/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. NARAYANAMMA WIFE OF LATE GUNDU RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT DOOR NO 22, 1ST FLOOR BALAJI LAYOUT R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560042

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2 . THE DEPUTY SECRETARY - 2 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 )

384



RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH EXECUTE ABSOLUTE SALE

DEEDS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE

PROCEEDINGS DATED 04.07.2016 [VIDE ANNEXURE -G TO K]

FOR ALLOTMENT OF 40% OF THE DEVELOPED AREA IN TERMS

OF GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 18.03.2011 [ANNEXURE - E]

AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.63172/2016: BETWEEN: 1. P K MOHAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, SON OF LATE N.P. MENON, RESIDENT OF NO.503, USHAKIRAN APARTMENTS, 25, HAUDIN ROAD, ULSOOR ROAD, BANGALORE-560042. 2. HARIKRISHNAN RAMACHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SON OF K. RAMACHANDRAN, RESIDINT OF LAKSHMY SADANAM, M G KAVU, TRICHUR, KERALA-680581. 3. H.N. VIJAYAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, SON OF SRI. H.B. NANJAN, R/AT NO.14, SRIRAM NAGAR, THUDIYALUR, COIMBATORE-641101.

4. SMT. ASHA J SATISH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. J. SATISH KUMAR, RESIDENT OF NO. 200, SUJAN 2ND CROSS, RAMGOPAL LAYOUT,

385

SUBBANAPALYA, BANSWADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560044.

5. SMT. C. BHAVANI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WIFE OF V K CHANDRASEKHARAN, RESIDENT OF 26/46, PERUMAL KOIL GARDEN STREET SOWCARPET

CHENNAI-600 079.

6. SMT. KAMLESH AHMED AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, WIFE OF FAROOQ AHMED, RESIDENT OF NO.304, 4TH CROSS. 3RD BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 043.

7. SMT. SHEILA SARIN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS WIFE OF LATE CAPT. V.P.S SARIN, RESIDENT OF NO.30, DEFENCE COLONY, IIND MAIN, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE-560038.

8. P.K. PADMANABHAN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, SON OF LATE P.S. KUPPUSWAMY IYER RESIDENT OF AT NO.334, 17TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN ROAD, INDIRANAGAR IIND STAGE, BANGALORE 560 038.

9. KENNETH PINTO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SON OF P F PINTO, RESIDENT OF DELPHI II 704 ACROPOLIS 20, HOSUR ROAD,

BANGALORE 560 029. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)

386

AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRNAT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.63308/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUSTAQ AHMED A.S. S/O. A.A. SHAFIULLA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, C/O. # 195, 4TH CROSS, RASHADNAGAR, ARABI COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560 045. 2. SRI. MUNEEB AHMED TIRUPATTUR S/O. T. MOHAMMAD GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

C/O. #195, 4TH CROSS, RASHADNAGAR, ARABI COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45.

387

3. SRI. NAJMA SULTHANA W/O. SRI. MOHAMMAD ILYYAS, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. #15, 6TH CROSS, K.G. HALLI, BANGALORE-45. 4. SRI. MOHAMMAD ISMAIL S/O. ABDUL RAZACK, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. #78, III MAIN, MUNIRAMMA BLOCK, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 032.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SATISH M. DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MINISTRY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE

RESPONDENTS FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONERS FROM

THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES WITHOUT FOLLOWING

THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ETC.

388

IN W.P.NO.64534/2016: BETWEEN: SRI K. PARTHASARATHY S/O SRI K SUBBARAO AGD ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO 150, 1ST FLOOR, 16TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI I STAGE, II BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560050

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.N. VISHWANATHA, ALONG WITH SRI. T.N. RAMESH, ADVOCATES) AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560001. ….RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADV) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT /NOTICE DATED 09.08.2016 VIDE ANNEX-H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.64705/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. C. CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHINNAPPA NO.43, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE)

389

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGLAORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.65118/2016: BETWEEN: 1. APPAIANNA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. NARAYANA SWAMY

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS 3. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

390

4. KRISHNAPPA SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS DAUGHTER YASHODA 5. MUNISONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 6. ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 7. LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ALL ARE CHILDREN OF LATE CHIKKAPPAIAH, RESIDING AT THANISANDRA K. R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. Y. S. H. REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MULTI STORED BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020


THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX -D DATED 18.06.2014 AND ETC.

391

IN W.P.NO.65121/2016: BETWEEN: SRI H. JAIMUNI S/O LATE HANUMATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.96 PRAKRUTHI LAYOUT 1ST MAIN,1ST CROSS KALYAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 043

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P. M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, T. CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T. CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020

….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME KNOWN AS 'ARKAVATHI LAYOUT' IN RESPECT OF LAND

BEARING SY.NO.94/9 MEASURING 1 ACRE 8 GUNTAS AND 2 GUNTAS KARAB SITUATED THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI , BANGALORE EAST TALUK, NOTIFIED BY PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003 AND PART-III NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX - E OF THE

392

R-2 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 23.02.2004, PART III VIDE BEARING NO. 274, NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX-F, FURTHER FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, VIDE ANNEX -G HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION 27 OF BDA ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.182/2017: BETWEEN: 1. T M DILIP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS SON OF LATE E. U. SHEKAR MENON RESIDENT OF NO.NO.F6 KRISHNA HEAVEN, N.R.I LAYOUT KALKERE RAMAMURTHY NAGAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 043 2. HARISH C. DHINGRA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS SON OF LATE D. N. DHINGRA RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.2, T-2 SHIVAJIMANIRAM APARTMENTS GANDHIMANDAPAM ROAD KOTTURPURAM CHENNAI-600085 3. MANIKKOTHE MOHAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SON OF P M R NAMBIAR RESIDENT OF KOYA MANGALAM OTTA PALAM-1 PALGHAT DISTRICT KERALA-679 101

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001

393

2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ARKAVATHY LAYOUT RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO

REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONERS IN

THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF

IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE

GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN

REASONABLE TIME AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.815/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. P.G. SREENATH S/O. LATE. P R GOPALAKRISHNA IYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO. 572ND CROSS, UTI BANK RAC, 80 FEET ROAD, III PHASE, 4TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU - 560085

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MURALIDHAR H.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPOMENT,

394

M.S. BUILDING, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. M.V. THANUJA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE R-1 TO REGISTER AND PUT THE PETITIONER IN [PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF SITE NO. BK -90, MEASURING 9X12 METERS AT ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, 18TH BLOCK, BENGALURU, IN LIEU OF SITE NO. 748, WHICH WAS ALLOTED AND REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNX - A AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2066/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. ASHWATHAMMA W/O LATE SRI. PILLARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.103 CHOWDAPPA LAYOUT K. NARAYANAPURA RAOD S. R. K. NAGAR POST THANISANDRA BENGALURU-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. GURU PRASAD A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SCRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORYED BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

BY ITS COMMISSIONER SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST

395

GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020 4. THE SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020 5. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020

….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX - A ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS UNDER SEC. 19(1) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT 1976 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.3178/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT C. M. CHANDRAKALA

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O SRI K. PRAKASH, R/AT 483, 5TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN, 4TH STAGE, BEML LAYOUT,

396

RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 098. 2. SMT. RATHNAMMA B. AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O LATE BODAPPA, R/AT NO. 43, AGS LAYOUT, M.S.R NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 054. 3. SMT. K. VASANTHA KUMARI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O K.V. ANANTHA, R/AT NO. 1019, GROUND FLOOR, 10TH MAIN ROAD, II STAGE, WEST OF CARD ROAD, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 086. 4. S. P. NATARAJ AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O J. T. PUTTASWAMY, R/AT NO. 7/B, KANNAN NILAYA, 5TH CROSS ROAD, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 023. 5. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, R/AT NO. 1214, 11TH B CROSS, II STAGE, WEST OF CORD ROAD, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 086. 6. M.S. KUMAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O M.S.SATYANARAYANA, R/AT NO. 139, 3RD CROSS, 4TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE, III PHASE, 6TH BLOCK,

BANASHANKARI, BANGALORE - 560 085. 7. H. BASAVARAJ GOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

397

S/O CHANNANA GOWDA, R/AT NO.B-291, 2ND 'A' MAIN, 12TH WARD, AYYAPPA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 036. 8. M NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, R/AT NO.G-782, 6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN CTS, HAL COLONY, MARATHAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 037. 9. SMT. B.S. KAMALU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O S.B.KRISHNA RAO, R/AT NO.90, 4TH BLOCK, TYAGARAJA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 028. 10. S. CHANDRASHEKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O SIDDARAMUJI RAO, R/AT KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE - 560 084.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST,

BANGALORE - 560 020 REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

398


…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -N DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.4293/2017: BETWEEN: SHRI CHAND PASHA S/O MOHAMMED MASTAN SAHIB, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO. 4, SHANTHAVEERAPPA LANE, CHICKPET CROSS, BANGALORE - 560 052

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020, 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

399

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE B TO G PROPERTIES BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS INSTIUTED UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003 FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE SCHEDULE - A PROPERTY FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT VIDE ANNEX-L R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX - P R-1 TO HAVE BEEN ABANDONED AND LAPSED AND HENCE HAVE BECOME INOPERATIVE IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE -B TO G PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.4400/2017:

BETWEEN:

1. SRI R. NARAYANA SWAMY S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

2. SRI PRAKASH S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

3. SRI. SURESH S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SL.NO.1 TO 3 RESIDING AT K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, KOTHANUR POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 4. SRI M. NARASIMHAIAH S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.182, HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, HUNASAMARANAHALLI POST, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE)

400

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITIION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY R-2 UNDER

SEC.17(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-G ISSUED BY R-2 AND

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 UNDER

SEC.19(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-H ISSUED BY R-1 AND RE-

MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, ISSUED BY R-1

U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-J ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO

FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTIES BEARING SY.NO.60/1

MEASURING 34 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.56/8, MEASURING 2

GUNTAS OF K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,

BANGALORE EAST TALUK, IS CONCERNED AS LAPSED IN TERMS

OF SEC. 25(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND

TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND

RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.

401

IN W.P.NO.4511/2017: BETWEEN: SRI C. RAJU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKATHIMMAIAH, R/AT NO.31/A, 18TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 053

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


CONSIDER THE REPORT OF THE R-3 VIDE ANNEX - D AND TO

ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE

SCHEME AND ETC.

402

IN W.P.NO.5036/2017: BETWEEN: SRI T. S. SATHYANARAYAN S/O SUNDARA RAJAN, AGED 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.765, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 'A' BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560010

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KRNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT. MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE

ANNEX-M, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONERS


403

IN W.P.NO.5037/2017: BETWEEN: SRI T. S. RADHIKA W/O P. K. RAMAMURTHY AGED 60 YEARS R/AT NO.1366, KAVITHA JAIN ROAD GIRINAGAR, 2ND PHASE BSK 3RD STAGE BENGALURU-560085

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. B. CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUE BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-J, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

404

IN W.P.NO.5073/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. D. LALI VERGHESE W/O VERGHESE AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3/1 AND 4/3 AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K. R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. S. BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME AND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS, PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 BY THE R-2 (ANNEXURE -E) AND NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT,

1976[ANNEXURE-F] HAVE LAPSED, IN SO FAR THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY COMPRISED IN SY NO. 3/1 AND 4/3 OF AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

405

IN W.P.NO.5207/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. RADHA W/O MR M. THIMME GOWDA AGED 56 YEARS NO.32,1ST MAIN 3RD CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-506 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

406

IN W.P.NO.5208/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. L. B. MUNILAKSHMAMMA AGEDA BOUT 45 YEARS WIFE OF SRI VENKATESH NO.74 2ND MAIN GEDDALAHALLI K NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL,

407

WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5213/2017: BETWEEN: SMT PRABHA RAJAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O SRI. S.M. RAJAN NO.74, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE

ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL,

408

WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5214/2017: BETWEEN SMT. E. KOUSALYA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE S.KANNAIAH, NO.113, 1ST MAIN, 8TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL

409

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5218/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. SHARATH BABU S/O MR. K. KAMALANATHAN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 2. MRS. KAVITHA PRIYADARSHINI W/O MR. K. SHARATH BABU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, BOTH AT NO.41, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST

BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

410

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5221/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. LOURDU MARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O SRI. FRANCIS, NO.7, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

411

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE [ANNEXURE - H] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5301/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT JOYCE SUNDER W/O MR J. SUNDER SINGH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9 KHATA NO. 619 & 620, AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077 2. SRI DEEPAK J. SUNDER S/O MR J SUNDER SINGH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9, KHATA NO 619 & 620, AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077 3. SMT REBECCA MONISHA SUNDER W/O JAWAHAR BYRAN RAJEEVA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9 KHATA NO 619 & 620,

AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077

412

4. SMT MOLLY MCINTYRE W/O E M MCINTYRE AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9 KHATA NO 619 & 620, AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M. S. BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


SCHEME AND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE

RESPONDENT PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION

DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976, BY THE

R-2 VIDE ANNEX-E AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004

ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BANGALORE

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 1976 VIDE ANNEX-F, HAVE LAPSED,

IN SO FAR AS THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE

SCHEDULED COMPRISED IN SY.NO.3/1 AND 4/3 OF AMANI

413

BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST

TALUK ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.5593/2017: BETWEEN: MR. T CHANDRASHEKAR S/O M.THIRUVENKATASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.27, 8TH CROSS, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 023.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. PAVITHRA A RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER INSTITUTED UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX-E

414

AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-F NOTIFIED FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5936/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. C. MANJULA W/O V L N MURTHY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.4/1, SHARADH NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS BASAVESHWAR LAYOUT NAGASHETTYHALLI BANGALORE-560094 2. SMT B. SHAHIKALA W/O H. P. NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/A NO.50, 8TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, 2ND BLOCK TALAKAVERI NAGAR AMRUTHALLI BANGALORE-560092 3. SMT V KALAVATHI W/O S VINAYAK AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/A NO.90, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, 2ND CROSS KALYAN NAGAR NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-560072 4. BHANUMATHI N D/O T N NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO.84, B G S LAYOUT NEAR DOUBLE ROAD JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064

5. S. KRISHNA PRASAD S/O LATE S SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/A NO.8, "YASHASVI"

415

13TH MAIN, 16TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560055 6. M RAM MOHAN S/O A NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A NO.92, 4TH MAIN SANJAY NAGAR BANGALORE-560094 7. SMT K. SUMA D/O VASUDEVAMAYYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/A NO.4267, SHANTI NIVAS SUBRAMANYA NAGARA BANGALORE-560021 8. SMT UMA L RAO D/O T L RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/A NO.92 4TH MAIN, NGEF LAYOUT SANJAY NAGAR BANGALORE-560094 9. K. SURYANARAYANA MAYYA S/O VASUDEVA MAYYA R/A NO.92 4TH MAIN, NGEF LAYOUT SANJAY NAGARA BANGALORE-560094 10. H. S. RUKHMINI W/O S. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.157, F-01 SRI. NAJUDESHWARA RESIDENCY BEML 4TH STAGE DOUBLE ROAD R R NAGAR BANGALORE-560098

11. SMT. KAMALA SHANKAR W/O P N SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.252, PALACE LOWER ARCHARD

416

SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORRE-560080 12. HIDAYATULLA KHAN S/O AHAMEDULLA KHAN MAJOR 1ST CROSS, KALISIPALYA NEW EXTENSION BANGALORE-560002 13. SMT B. K. JAGADAMBA D/O B K BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.504/1 4TH MAIN ROAD, KENGERI UPANAGARA BANGALORE-560060 14. MADHU SHREE C. R. W/O C R RAVINDRA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO.107, SAVERIN PARK APARTMENT BUILDING, NO.56 K. R. NAGAR BANGLAORE-560004 15. R SRINIVASAIAH S/O LATE RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.55 6TH MAIN, 40TH CROSS 5TH BLOCK,JAYANAGAR BANGALORE-11 16. SHANKAR NARAYAN S/O LATE NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A NO.389/7 METRO LAYOUT NAYANDAHALLI BANGALORE-560039

17. K V CHINANNA S/O LATE VENKAT KRISHNA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS NO.50, HANUMA NILAYA

417

5TH CROSS, K P AGRAHARA MAGADI ROAD BANGALORE-560023 18. R. CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O LATE D.M. RAMASWAMY AGE 58 YEARS, NO.25, SOUTH END ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE- 560 004 19. K. SRINIVAS S/O LATE K. NARAYAN RAO AGED 58 YEARS NO.18/2, ISEC CAMPUS, NAGARBHAVI POST, BANGALORE 560 072. 20. N.S. VENKATANARAYANAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGE 46 YEARS, NO.106, VYSHNAVI, 2ND MAIN, BEST COUNTY 2, HESSARGHATA MAIN ROAD, CHIKK ABETTAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 097 REPRESENTED BY G.P.A. HOLDER N. MURALI 21. N.R. CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O LATE RUDRAPPA AGE 71 YEARS, NO.408, 22ND MAIN J.P. NAGARA 2ND STAGE, MYSORE - 08 22. SMT. B. KAMALAKSHI W/O C.R. CHANDRANNA AGE MAJOR NO.204/B, 6TH MAIN, 27TH CROSS,

3RD BLOCK JAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 011. 23. FAROOQ MUNAVAR S/O LATE PEER MUNAVAR

418

AGED 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.46, 1ST FLOOR, ST. THOMAS ROAD, KACHARKANAHALLI, BANGALORE- 560 087. 24. CHITLUR NAGARAJ DILEEP S/O C.S. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.397, 24TH B CROSS, BANASHANKRI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE . 25. D.M. PARVATHAMMA D/O T.B. RAJSHEKAR MAJOR NO.676, 4TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 086. 26. D.M. NAGAMANI W/O D.T. SHIVA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.91, BINNY LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 040. 27. M.P. KEMPAIAH S/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED 82 YEARS NO.558, D BLOCK, 1ST STAGE,J.P. NAGAR MYSORE- 08. 28. INDU PRASAD W/O B.S. SHIV PRASAD AGED 47 YEARS, NO.69, 5TH CROSS, BAPUJI LAYOUT, ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040.

29. R. GOVIND RAJAN S/O A. RAJGOPALA BHATA, AGED 48 YEARS REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER

419

R. GOPAL KRISHNA NO.54, GROUND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, SAI GARDEN VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 097. 30. N.S. RAVIKIRAN S/O NAMARANGAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.40/8, PATTANKAR LAYOUT, 13TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B. M. HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE 560 01 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH HALL, BANGALORE - 560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGLAORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH HALL, BANGALORE- 560020 4. M/S TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.12/3A, NANDAGOKULA, YAMUNABAI ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

420

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-L IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.6637/2017: BETWEEN: SRI HARIRAJAN C S/O LATE CHINNATHAMBI, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, #J-175, 2ND MAIN ROAD, HANUMANTHAPURAM, SRIRAMPURAM, BENGALOORU-560021.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEERABHADRAIAH M. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALOORU-560020. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALOORU-560001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOTMENT OF AN ALTERNATIVE SITE BEARING NO.6/A, MEASURING 30X40 FEET, 3RD STAGE, III PHASE, 6TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI, BENGALURU IN FAVOUR

OF THE PETITIONER INSTEAD OF SITE BEARING NO. 1458, MEASURING 9 X 12 METERS, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, 11TH BLOCK, BENGALURU AND ETC.

421

IN W.P.NO.6998/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. V. M. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE MARGABANDHU AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS R/A NO.86/33, 8TH MAIN RAJAMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION BANGALORE-560080 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CONSIDER

THE REPORT OF R-3 AT ANNEX - C AND TO ALLOT AN

ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE SCHEME AND

ETC

422

IN W.P.NO.6999/2017: BETWEEN: SRI GOWRISHANKAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. SUBRAMANYA, R/AT NO. 1971, 4TH CROSS, 28TH MAIN, JP NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE 560078


…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


CONSIDER THE REPORT OF THE R-3 AT ANNEX - D AND TO

ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE

SCHEME AND ETC.

423

IN W.P.NO.7000/2017: BETWEEN: SRI K SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O V.M. KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.86/33, 8TH MAIN, RAJAMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION, BANGALORE 560 080.


…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE




ETC.

424

IN W.P.NO.7001/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. ANNAPOORNI AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, W/O LATE V M DORAISWAMY, R/AT NO.227, BASAVANAPURA ROAD, DEVASANDRA, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE-560036


…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE




ETC.

425

IN W.P.NO.10503/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. B. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE BACHANNA R/AT NO.21 K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE-560 077


…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE



ANNEXURE-J IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS

CONCERNED AND ETC.

426

IN W.P.NO.10504/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 2 . SRI SHAMANNA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE MUNIANJANAPPA R/AT NO.21 K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER PALACE ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-506 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-III BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PALACE ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-506 020

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

427



NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-K IN SO FAR AS


IN W.P.NO.11782/2017: BETWEEN: 1 . M. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 2 . M. SHIVASHANKAR

S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.

3 . NARASIMHAIAH

S/O LATE DODDAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.

4 . KRISHNA MURTHY

S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

5 . ANJANAPPA

S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS.

6 . RAVI KUMAR

S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.18 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS S.K. GARDEN, BENSON TOWN POST, BENGALURU - 560 046.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SUNDARESH H. C., ADVOCATE)

428

AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.

2 . THE COMMISSIONER

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.

3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE

THAT THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY BEARING SY NO.1/2

MEASURING 8 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, PURSUANT TO

PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL

NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX-B AND C ISSUED BY

R-2 AND R-1 RESPECTIVELY SO FOR AS IT RELATES TO

PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERN HAS BEEN LAPSED

UNDER SEC.24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND

TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATIONS AND

RESETTLEMENT ACT.

429

IN W.P.NO.12547/2017: BETWEEN: MR. HANUMAIAH S/O LATE MUISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.2/2, JAKKUR LAKE ROAD JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE - 560 064.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 1 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE -560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND


ENDORSEMENT DATED: 27.01.2017 ISSUED BY R-3 AT ANNEX-L

AND TO DECLARE THAT THE SAID LAND FALLS WITHIN THE

PARAMETER 2 AND 6 OF THE BANDU RAMASWAMY CASE AND

CONSEQUENTLY, QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED:

18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J ISSUED BY R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE

PETITIONER'S ABOVE SAID LAND AND ETC.

430

IN W.P.NO.13456/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. S.N. GAYATHRI DEVI W/O SHRI. K.S. RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 50 YE ARS R/AT SNS HOUSE, NO.1076 2ND FLOOR, 23RD MAIN ROAD 11TH CROSS, HSR LAYOUT IST SECTOR, BENGALURU - 560 102.

..PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

2 . THE COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 4 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R4; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

431

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED:16.02.2013 AND 05.09.2013 AS ANNEX-P & Q RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY. IN W.P.NO.14238/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. B. DRAKSHAYANI W/O G.S. THAMMAIAH GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.61,1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 077.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND:

1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

432

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY. NO.31, GEDDAKAGAKKU VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED:18.06.2014 ISSUE BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-J ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW.

IN W.P.NO.14626/2017:

BETWEEN:

SRI. FRANCIS AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O CHINNAPPA NO.45, 2ND MAIN ROAD 8TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST

BANGALORE - 560 077. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560 001.

2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAYKUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

433

THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-L) IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14627/2017: BETWEEN: DR. G. DEVAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS SON OF LATE L. GOVINDARAJ NO.4221, "DIYA" 11TH MAIN 3RD CROSS, J BLOCK KANAKADASANAGAR, MYSORE - 570 022.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAYKUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

434

THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED BY R-1. IN W.P.NO.14628/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. GEORGE. C S/O CHOWRI RAJ AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS NO.92, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST

BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

435

THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14629/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LATE A. DORAISWAMY NO.55, 13TH MAIN J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 086.


REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.

2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BYITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST


(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

436

THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-G) IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14630/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE A. DORAISAMY NO.55, 13TH MAIN J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 086.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA


2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST


(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

437

THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEX-G IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14631/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS SON OF LATE A. DORAISAMY NO.55, 13TH MAIN J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 086.



2 . FBANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST0 BANGALORE -560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

438

THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEX-G IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14632/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SON OF LATE A. DORAISAMY, NO.55, 13TH MAIN, J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 086.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

439







NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - G IS

ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST

AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.14670/2017: BETWEEN; SRI D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE A DORAISAMY, NO.55, 13TH MAIN, J.C.NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 086.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

440

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14868/2017: BETWEEN:

1. SMT. VARSHA RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, W/O SRI RAGHAVENDRA, R/AT 7022, SHOBA CHRYSAN THEMUM THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 077. 2. YOGENDRA NAKRE AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE APPANNA POOJARY, R/AT NO.91, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, PAI LAYOUT, OLD MADRAS ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. CHALUVARAYA SWAMY R N AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH R K., R/AT NO.140, 2ND MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, 1ST STAGE, HBR LAYOUT,KALYANAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 043. 4. D.A. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

441

S/O D.ANANDARAM, R/AT NO.957, ANJANADRI, 12TH CROSS ROAD, 35TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST PHASE, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078. 5. KHAMER AHMED CHETTANAI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O ABDUL MALIK CHETTANAI, R/AT NO.308, III B MAIN, KASTURINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 016. 6. VITTALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O BADIYA SHETTY, R/AT OLD NO.4, NEW NO.18, LALABAHADUR SASTRY NAGAR, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 038. 7. SRIKANTA BABU K. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O SRI A KRISHNAIAH SHETTY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT QUARTERS, MAGADI ROAD KHB COLONY, BANGALORE - 560 079. 8. C.V. GANAPATHY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O LATE C.M.UTAHAIAH, R/AT NO.G-46, OLD TOWNSHIP, HAL COLONY, VIMANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 017. 9. K. VENKATACHALAPATHY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O K.V.KRISHNAIAHSETTY, R/AT NO.261, 1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010. 10. SMT. ANUSUYADEVI

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMASUBBAIAH SHETTY, R/AT NO.281, SUPRABHA, 10TH MAIN, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 019.

442

11. SMT. C.S. LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, W/O C. VENKATACHARYULU, R/AT FLAT NO.201, SAMHITA RESIDENCY, PAI LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN ROAD, BENNIGANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 016.

12. SMT. L.BABY NANDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O SRI R.R.SHINDE, R/AT V.B.R./HSR GRAND, FLAT NO.009, NO.3, OPP GRAND STORES, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR MAIN ROAD DODDA BANASWADI, BANGALORE - 560 043.

13. K. SANNA THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE JAMMA GOPAL KAMAIAH, C/O PALAIAH, R/AT G.867, 10TH CROSS, CTS HAL COLONY, MARATHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 037.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. REPT BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS


443

SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - Q DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15038/2017: BETWEEN: SRI RAMADASS G., S/O GOVINDASAMY K, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO.30, IST MAIN, 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE

444

ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15588/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. YASHODA.G AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O SRI.K.T.SUBRAMANYA, R/AT NO.217, 4TH CROSS ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, KHB COLONY, BANGALORE-560095. 2. SUDHENDRA ROA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE PANDURANGA RAO, R/AT NO.17/2, SRI RENUKA NILAYA, SLN TEMPLE ROAD, MUNNE KOLAR, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE-560037. 3. SMT Y. SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, W/O Y.SRINIVASACHAR, R/AT NO.139/3, 8TH CROSS ROAD, GOVINDARAJANAGAR, BANGALORE-560040. 4. HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, S/O LATE SANJEEVAIAH, R/AT NO.1890, AATHMEEYA, 20TH MAIN ROAD, 20TH B CROSS, M.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR,

BANGALORE-560040. 5. SUNIL M MATHAD AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O MAHADEV MATHAD,

445

R/AT NO.29, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, 9TH A CROSS, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAXMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560086. 6. A. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O LATE A ARMUGAM, R/AT NO.17, SULTAN G GUNTA ROAD, M.NO.4TH STREET, BANGALORE-560051. 7. SRI C. N. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE C.A.NARASHIMAMURTHY, R/AT NO.724/31, 2ND MAIN ROAD, D BLOCK, II STAGE, RAJAJINGAR, BANGALORE-560010. 8. J. GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE JAYACHIKKANNA REDDY, R/AT NO.19, CHINMAYA NILAYA, GREEN MEDOSA LAYOUT, KEREGUDDARAHALLI, CHIKKABANAVARA POST, BANGALORE-560090. 9. SMT. P. SUDHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O PERMANANDA SRINIVAS, R/AT L-77/3, II FLOOR, 4TH MAIN, L.N.PURAM, BANGALORE-560021. 10. D. J. JAYARAMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O JAVARAIAH, R/AT NO.138/A, KIOCL TOWNSHIP, KAVOOR, MANGALORE-575015,

BANGALORE-560020. 11. YARRAPPA M V AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O CHINNAVENKATARAYAPPA,

446

R/AT NO.34, GARDEN VILAS, MARUTHI NAGAR, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560072.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020, REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-P DATED 18.06.2014, ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.18427/2017:

BETWEEN:

LEONARD D COSTA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE. WELLINGTON D'COSTA,

R/O. 16, SAGAR, CHS, SOUTH STREET, DONA PAULA, GOA - 403 004. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)

447

AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560001 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER (ARKAVATHI LAYOUT), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJARAM S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO. 34 NEW HOUSE LIST KHATA NO. 50/34 MEASURING 50X80 SITUATED AT THANISANDRA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.21361/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. P. SOMAIAH S/O D K PONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.247,1ST 'E' MAIN SHIVANAGAR,RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. T. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE ) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020

448

2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-3 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO EXECUTE THE ABSOLUTE SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF SITE BEARING NO. 117, SITUATED AT ARKAVATI LAYOUT, BLOCK -VII, BANGALORE, MEASURING 9X12 METERS AND COMPLETE THE PROCESS OF REGISTRATION FORTHWITH AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24061/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. S. ROY MATHEW S/O DR. JOHN MATHEW AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS NO.84, IST MAIN 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

449

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE [ANNEXURE - H] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24065/2017: BETWEEN: SRI S. ROY MATHEW S/O DR. JOHN MATHEW AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS NO.84, IST MAIN 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

450

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24506/2017: BETWEEN: SRI SHIVALINGIAH H. G AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, SON OF LATE GANGAIAH NO.18, 2ND MAIN 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANA POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY


451

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24508/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. R. HOMBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, SON OF RAMAIAH NO.13 B, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

452

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24509/2017: BETWEEN: SMT KAVITHA SOMASUNDARAM WIFE OF SOMASUNDARAM AGED 45 YEARS, NO.29, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS,

BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,

453

BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.25120/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. LINGANNA SON OF SRI PACHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 34, 2 B CROSS ROAD NEAR VIDYAPEETA CIRCLE BANK COLONY TYAGARAJANAGARA BANGALORE - 560028

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

454

2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY - 3 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS ON THE FILE OF R-1 IN THE MATTER OF ALLOTMENT AND EXECUTION OF SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE BEARING NO. RH-ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, BLOCK NO.11, AS PER CORRECT DIMENSION REPORT DATED 25.02.2016 VIDE ANNEX - L AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26455/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. GEETHA BAI W/O. SHRI R. SHIVAJI RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT NO.240/6 12 D. T. EXTENSION K. G. NAGAR BENGALURU-560 019

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR M. S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD

455

KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 & 3 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNX-N & P RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26456/2017: BETWEEN: DR P. CHANDRA SHEKAR REDDY S/O LATE P. SANNABASAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO. 141, UPSTAIRS 2ND MAIN, AGS COLONY, ANAND NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 024.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

456

CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEX-K AND L RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26457/2017: BETWEEN: SHRI C. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.38, RACHENAHALLI, DR. SHIVARAM NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

457

CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 4. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP BY UNDER SECRETARY.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R4; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26458/2017: BETWEEN SHRI C. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO. 38, RACHENAHALLI, DR. SHIVARAM NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,

458

BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.28359/2017: BETWEEN: SANJAY KUMAR S/O S. P. GOEL AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDENT OF FLAT NO.803 TOWER 3, BESTECH PARKVIEW RESIDENCY SECTOR 66, MOHALI PUNJAB-160062

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD

459

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560001 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (ARKAVATHY LAYOUT) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO.89, HOUSE LIST KHATA NO. 141/89 MEASURING 30X40 SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLY VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT OT REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.30485/2017: BETWEEN: 1. N. ASHOK AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE. P. S. NARAYANASWAMY, R/AT NO. 197, 7TH MAIN ROAD, SRINIVASA NAGAR, BSK 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560050 2. B. R. GOVINDA RAJU AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE. B K RAMA RAJU, R/AT NO. 282, SAPTHAGIRI, 3RD-A-MAIN A-BLOCK,

KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560095 3. MOHAMMED MUNIRUDDIN AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,

460

S/O.MOHAMMED HISAMUDDIN, R/AT NO. 2-1-40/1, BESIDE JAIL ANDOROON, QILA RAICHUR, RAICHUR- 584101 4. K. KUMARASWAMY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O. K. KUPPASWAMY, R/AT NO. 1, DICKENSON ROAD, BENGALURU 560042 5. KANDAGAL B. A. AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. AMIRABI, R/AT NO. 5, 9, KARNATAKA BATTALION, NCC, MARKETED BUILDING, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560052 6. V. SIVASANKARAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. LATE. P. VELAYUDHAN, R/AT NO. 74, RANDAPPA COLONY, BYAPPANAHALLI EXTN, INDIRANAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560038 7. SRI. C A ANJANEYALU AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE. C ADINARAYAN, R/AT NO. 6, D V APPARAO LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU- 560016 8. M. T. DHEERENDRACHAR AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. M. TRIVIKARAMACHAR,

R/AT NO. 313,2ND-A-CROSS, 1ST PHASE ,GIRINAGAR, VHB COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560085

461

9. P. RAJASHEKARAN NAIR AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. N. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, 6TH CROSS, 6TH MN, DOMLURU LAYOUT, BENGALURU- 560071 10. A. M. MUDDAHANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. MUDDAHANUMAIAH, R/AT NO. 352, 2ND CROSS,2ND PHASE, PEENYA,RAJAGOPAL NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560058 11. P. S. SHANMUGAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O. LATE. P. SHIVANNA, R/AT NO. 9, MANUVANA, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560010

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUIDLING, DR. ABMEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. REPT BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY,

KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE- 560020. 4. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. LATE MUNEGOWDA

462

MAJOR IN AGE RESIDING AT SREERAMPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 5. SMT. ERAMMA, W/O BUDDANNA MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 6. GOVINDAPPA, S/O. BUDDANNA MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 7. LAXMAMMA W/O. NAGAPPA MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 8. GUNDAPPA N, S/O. NANJAPPA REDDY MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURAM JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SMT. JAYAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SMT. ERAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. GOVINDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SMT. LAXMAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R7)


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEX-P

DATED 18.06.2017 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.

463

IN W.P.NO.31268/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. K. SUDHA D/O. K. NAGESHWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO. 107, SHANTHIBAGH APARTMENTS, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD-16.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 003.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND

MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE -D ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO.5 ASSESSMENT NO. 46/2 KHATHA NO. 621 MEASURING EAST TO WEST 75 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH

464

40 FEET COMPRISING OF HOUSE AND REVENUE SITE BEARING NO.6 ASSESSMENT NO. 46/2 KHATA NO.621 MEASURING EAST TO WEST 75 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH 40' FEET COMPRISING OF HOUSE BOTH THE SITES ARE FORMED IN SY. NO. 46/2 SITUATED AT AMRUTAHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALUR NORTH TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.33191/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. B. L. RAMAPPA S/O. LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.3/132, MANAVARTHI GARDEN, MASJID ROAD, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH K. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRTARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOPAL V. BILAMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


ENDORSEMENT DATED 23.08.2016 AT ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY

THE R-2 AND ETC.

465

IN W.P.NO.35344/2017: BETWEEN: 1. S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR S/O LATE SHANKARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SINCE DEAD BY LR'S 1(a). C. GOWRAMMA W/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 55 YEARS 1(b). SRIDHAR. C S/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 34 YEARS 1(c). BHAGYAJOTHI D/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 31 YEARS 1(d). GIRISH.C S/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 27 YEARS ALL ARE R/O 43, RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE BANGALORE - 560 077 2. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE SHANKARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 077

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.R. SESHADRI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 20.03.2018)

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN

466

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R3; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE R-2 BDA PERTAINING TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF LAND ACQUISITION IN CASE NO. R173/2003-04 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.91 OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE (EAST) AT ANNEX - G AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.37044/2017: BETWEEN: SRI.D.V.ARUNACHALAIAH S/O LATE D VENKATASUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT 3RD FLOOR, MARALU RAJANNA BUILDING MARASANDRA MAIN ROAD, NEAR CORPORATION BANK HAROHALLI KANAKAPURA TALUK-562 112

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESH D. C., ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER

467

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-1 T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. M. V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO ALLOT THE SITE MEASURING 30X40 FEET TO THE PETITIONER IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT ITSELF AS HE HAS MADE SEVEN ATTEMPTS AS PER THE UNOFFICIAL NOTE DATED 30.12.2011 ISSUE DBY CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, BDA VIDE ANNEX - F AND THE SUBSEQUENT ENDORSEMENT DATED 17.04.2012, DATED 27.06.2012 AND 18.02.2013 VIDE ANNEX-J, H AND K RESPECTIVELY FORTHWITH. IN W.P.NO.40596/2017: BETWEEN: K. N. VENKATESHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE K.V.NARAYANAPPA, R/AT NO.851/A, 17TH G MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY.

468

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR,AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE, THAT THE ACQUISITION NOTIFICATIONS DATED 03.02.2003, ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) OF THE BDA ACT, 1976 AT ANNEX-B, BY THE R-2 FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT AT ANNEX - C AND MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNX -G ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED, ARE LAPSED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.42836/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. P. SHAKUNTALA W/O DR P CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.17, IST FLOOR, UAS, GK VK LAYOUT, 2ND CROSS, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

469

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.A. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)



ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE FINAL NOTIFICATION

DATED 23.02.2204 AS PER ANNEXURE - J ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN

RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE

LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF

RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND

ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013

[ CENTRAL ACT 30/2013] AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE

RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN

VIEW OF THE DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF THE

NEW ACT AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.43194/2017:

BETWEEN

SRIRAMA REDDY S/O LATE KEMPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.619, SRI CHOWDESHWARY NILAYA, 8TH CROSS, NEAR SAPPALAMMA TEMPLE, JAYANAGARA, KOLAR-563101

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE V.S., ADVOCATE)

470

AND: 1. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE SECRETARY BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJA H. T., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.05.2017 VIDE ANNEX - F AND F1 AND TO ALLOT THE SITE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER ADJACENT TO THE EARLIER ALLOTED SITE IN THE VERY SAME AREA AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.43207/2017: BETWEEN: SRI VENKATESH PRABHU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O KEMPAHANUMAIAH NO 396, 5TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BANGALORE - 560079

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. YASHAS B. L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST

BENGALURU - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

471

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE BDA TO CONVEY THE SITE BEARING NO. 16 MEASURING 15 X 24 METERS IN BLOCK VI OF THE ARKAVATHY LAYOUT FORTHWITH AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.45953/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. A. DORISWAMY S/O LATE ARMUGAM AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO.55, 3RD CROSS GANGAMMA LAYOUT, MAHADEVAPURA BANGALORE-48

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 REPT BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 4. SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MUNIUTHAPPA

472

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


ENDORSEMENT DATED 12.05.2017 ISSUED BY THE 3RD

RESPONDENT REJECTING THE CLAIM OF THE PETITIONER

CONTENDING THAT VENDOR OF THE PETITIONER I.E. SRI

MUNIYAPPA S/O. MUNIUTHAPPA, 4TH RESPONDENT HAS BEEN

ALLOTTED THE ALTERNATIVE SITES UNDER 40:60 RATION

WHICH IS NOT PERMISSIBLE UNDER LAW IN RESPECT OF SITE

BEARING NO.6 IN SY.NO. 48/5 SITUATED AT AMRUTHAHALLI,

YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK VIDE ANNX - A

AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.46333/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. UMA VARMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS W/O G.GODAVARMA RAJA, NO.32, PROMENADE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 005

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

473

2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT DATED 07.04.2017 ISSUED BY R-2 AS WELL AS THE PROCEEDINGS OF R-2 DATED 29.12.2016 IN SUBJECT NO. 141/2016 AT ANNEX -L1 TO W.P. (II) QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AT ANNEXURE -G SO FAR IT PERTAINS TO SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -F IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVING REGARD TO THE DIRECTIONS GIVEN BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN THE CASE OF COMMISSIONER B.D.A. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA REPORTED IN ILP 2006 KAR 318 AND BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHER VS STATE OF KARNATAKA. IN W.P.NO.46766/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. BASAVARAJU C. A. S/O. LATE PATEL ANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO. 965, 4TH MAIN ROAD, BSK 3RD STAGE, KALIDASANAGAR, HOSKEREHALLI, BENGALURU-560 085.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. NAIK N. R., ADVOCATE)

474

AND: THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU-560 002.

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


RESPONDENT'S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THE REGISTERED

SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO. BK-17,

MEASURING 6.00 X 9.00 METERS, FORMED IN SY.NO. 22,

BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, 18TH BLOCK, ARKAVATHI EXTENSION

BENGALURU AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.47823/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. APPANNA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA RESIDING AT K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560004 BY ITS COMMISSIONER

475

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE -560004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.47854/2017:

BETWEEN:

RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIANJINAPPA RESIDING AT K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 562 317

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560004 BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE -560004

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

476

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - E AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.49031/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJEGOWDA S/O LATE JAVARAPPA, AGED 68 YEARS R/AT NO.417, 13TH MAIN ROAD, M.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. S. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. THE SECRETARY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY -III BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-IV, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. GOPAL V. BILALMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)

477

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT TO COMPLETE THE REMAINING PROCESS I.E., TO ISSUE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE AND ALSO TO EXECUTE THE REGISITERED LEASE CUM SALE AGREEMENT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO. 1043, BLOCK VIII, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BANGALORE BASSED ON THE ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 10.04.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J TO W.P. AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.50540/2017: BETWEEN; 1. SETHUMADHAVAN S/O A.P.V NAIR, AGE: 75 YEARS, R/AT NO 59, ARADHANA, AECS LAYOUT SANJAYANAGAR , BENGALURU - 560094 2. C. REKHA JETTY D/O K S CHANDRAN AGE:51 YEARS R/AT NO 22, 5TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, AGS LAYOUT, NEW BEL ROAD, BENGALURU - 560054 3. SANTHOSH KUMAR V. K S/O LATE A. C. B. NAIR AGE 54 YEARS R/AT NO 25, 5TH CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 4. C R JANARDHANAN S/O LATE T P RAMAN NAIR,

AGE:73 YEARS R/AT NO 12, 3RD CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT,

478

NEAR TELECOM LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU 5. PREM KUMAR S/O LATE P. SHIVASHANKARAN AGE: 46 YEARS R/AT NO 26, ADEEP 5TH CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 6. USHA HUSSAIN W/O ARSHAD HUSSAIN, AGE 48 YEARS, R/AT NO 7104, SOBHA CHRYSANTHEMU, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560077 7. P. R. SUBRAMANIAN S/O P. R. RAMAMURTHY AGE:58 YEARS R/AT NO 10, 3RD CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 8. S. PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O B. SHIVAJI RAO, AGE:43 YEARS R/AT NO 4, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 9. AJAY KUMAR S/O LATE K. N. SINGH AGE: 58 YEARS R/AT NO 22, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT

ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077

479

10. VEENA THANGAMANI W/O NITHYNANDAN ANDIAPPA NAGERCOIL AGE:42 YEARS R/AT NO 182, RAMGOPAL LAYOUT SUBBANNA PALYAM BANASWADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE- 560043 11. VIJAYAKUMAR NAIK S/O LATE K K NAIR, AGE: 58 YEARS R/AT NO 24, 5TH CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMAD AYUB ALI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRTARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGLAORE - 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT REVENUE BHAVAN K. G. ROAD, BANGALORE- 560009

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R3; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY

480

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNX - H ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-G AND ALSO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-N ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO SITE NOS. 2,3,5,25,12,26,14/A,10,4,22,17 AND 24 BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS FORMED IN SY.NO.12/4 OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53428/2017: BETWEEN: SHADRACH S/O PETRAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT NO 25, LAXMIPATHY LAYOUT KARIYANNAPALYA BEHIND SPEECH AND HEARING INSTITUTE ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BENGALURU - 560084

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKASA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

481

KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.A. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PASSED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED BEARING SY.NO.30/4 TO AN EXTENT OF 0.22 GUNTAS OF LAND NOTIFIED FOR THE ACQUISITION IN THE YEAR 2004 AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.54064/2017:

BETWEEN:

1. GEORGE K SAMUEL S/O LATE K A SAMUEL, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT KUTTIKATTU, NEDUMPARAMBU, PATHANAPURAM POST,

KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, SRI BIJU THOMAS PAREL, S/O P M THOMAS, NO.1, PAREL HOUSE, JYOTHINAGAR, IST CROSS, HORAMAVU AGARA, BENGALURU-560043

2. SRI MULLUMKATTI MATHE THOMAS S/O M.T. MATHEW, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT MULLUMKATTIL, EBENEZER, ANGADI P.O., RANNY, KERALA-689674 REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER, P.P PAULSON S/O P.U.PAULSON, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.12, NEW MILLENEUM STREET, HORAMAVU, AGARA, BENGALURU-560043. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJAPPA A., ADVOCATE)

482

AND:

1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P (WEST) BENGALURU-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

2. THE ADDL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P (WEST) BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO STRICTLY ADHERE AND FOLLOW CONDITIONS STIPULATED IN TERMS OF BANDU RAMASWAMY V/S BDA REPORTED IN 2010 (7) SCC PAGE 129 IN REPECT OF SY.NO.46/1 OF AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK

FORMED ON 0.24 GUNTAS OUT OF 2 ACTES 24 GUNTAS ACQUIRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, AND DROP THE ACTION INITIATED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54863/2017: BETWEEN: 1. MR. CHEMBRATH VENUGOPAL S/O SRI.C.V. ACHUTHAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.605 A-2 MALLAPRABHA BLOCK

NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560047 2. MRS. REMADEVI VENUGOPAL W/O CHEMBRATH VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.605 A-2 MALLAPRABHA BLOCK NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560047. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)

483

AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 3. STATE OF KARANTAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND TO DIRECT THEM

TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30 X 40 IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN

ANY LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONERS

AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.55316/2017: BETWEEN: MR. SHYAM MOHAN GARG AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O VISHWAMBHAR NATH GARG, NO.18, BRIJ NAGAR, MATHURA, UTTARPRADESH-281 001 TODAY AT BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)

484

AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOWTHAM DEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE


MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND TO DIRECT THEM

TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30' X 40' IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN

ANY LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONER

AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.55317/2017: BETWEEN: 1. MRS. KOKIL GARG D/O. JAMUNA PRASAD AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS NO.18, BRIJ NAGAR, MATHURA, UTTARPRADESH-281001 TODAY AT BANGALORE.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)

485

AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND TO DIRECT THEM TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30' X 40' IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN ANY LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56035/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. K. MUNISHAMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA NO.475, 11TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR

BENGALURU-560080 ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE)

486

AND: THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK EAST BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. M V ADITHI, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ALLOT ALTERNATIVE SITE MEASURING 15 METERS TO 24 METERS IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR SIMILARLY DEVELOPED LAYOUT TO THE PETITIONER WITHOUT INSISTING FOR PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OR EXTRA AMOUNT TOWARDS THE SITAL VALUE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.3157/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. M. A. SYED NISAR AHMED AGED 59 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED AMEER SAB R/O NO.DA-57 KHB QUARTERS, KAVAL BYRASANDRA SULTHANPALYA R. T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560 032

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST BENGALURU-560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-III BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOPAL BILALMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2)

487

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EXECUTE THE REGULAR SALE DEED IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SITE ALLOTTED TO HIM VIZ., SITE NO. 376/A, BLOCK - V, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BENGALURU, MEASURING 9 X 12 METERS IN PURSUANCE OF THE LEASE - CUM- SALE AGREEMENT DATED 30.06.2006 AS PER ANNEXURE - B EXECUTED BY R-2 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.3523/2018: BETWEEN: ANURADHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O LATE B R.T. RAJU NO.8/10, 1ST CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560020.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020. 2. LAND ACQUISITION AUTHORITY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTRHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE


RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE AT

ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AS PER ORDER DATED 11/03/2014 ISSUED

BY R-2 A COPY OF WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - C AND

ETC.

488

IN W.P.NO.5448/2018: BETWEEN: M/S. TRINITY VILLAGE PLOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, R/O TRINITY ENCLAVE , HENNUR MAIN ROAD BANGALORE - 43 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY M. SRINIVAS

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001 REPT BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020

...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 AND R-3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION S OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 14.02.2014 AND 31.01.2018 GIVEN FOR DELETION OF HOUSE SITES FROM THE ACQUISITION IN RESPECT OF

SCHEDULE PROPERTIES SITUATED AT K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, VIDE ANNEX-A AND B RESPECTIVELY, AS PER THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2014 PASSED IN W.P. 32120-21/2013 AND 32371-32376/2013 AND 3481-3558/2014 (LA-BDA) VIDE ANNEX-D AND

489

ALSO AS PER THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN THE CASE OF BONDURAMASWAMY AND OTHERS VS. BDA AND OTHERS (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8731/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI H. M. KUMAR S/O SRI HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.2244, 9TH MAIN ROAD, "E" BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010 2. SRI. M. HUCHE GOWDA S/O. LATE MARE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.322, 19TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, BEML LAYOUT, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560079

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HAVING OFFICE AT T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HAVING OFFICE AT T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020

3. THE BEML EMPLOYEE'S CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED REGD NO.ARB-2/F/PR-45/1983/71-72/

490

ARB-2/AUD/196/80-81, CARE OF BHARAT EARTH MOVERS LIMITED, B.E.M.L COMPLEX, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BENGALURU-560075 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 4. SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA S/O LATE M. NARAYANA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 5. SMT. N. USHA GOPALA GOWDA W/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 6. KUM. SHARANYA D/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, 7. KUM YOGITHA D/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, 8. KUM VARSHITHA D/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, SINCE MINOR IN AGE, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, THE RESPONDENT NO.4 HEREIN RESPONDENTS 4 TO 8 ARE R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560077 9. SRI. T. V. MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T. C. VENKATASWAMAPPA,

R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560045

491

10. SRI CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O SRI DYAVAPPA, 11. SMT BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 12. SMT. C. KANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, D/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 13. SMT C. ANASUYA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 14. SRI C. KUMARA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 15. SRI C. KESHAVA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O SRI. CHANNAPPA, 16. SRI C. DEVARAJA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O SRI. CHANNAPPA, 17. SRI. C. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 18. SRI. C. PRADEEP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O SRI CHANNAPPA, RESPONDENTS 10 TO 18 ARE R/AT SARI PALYA, THANISANDRA DHAKLE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045

19. SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI THAMME GOWDA,

492

20. KUM M SHRAVANTHI D/O SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 21. SRI M. HARSHIT GOWDA S/O SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 19 TO 21 ARE R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045 22. SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKA PAPANNA, 23. SMT SHYLAJA W/O SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 24. SRI NAGENDRA S/O SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 25. SRI VIJAYENDRA S/O SRI T P NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 22 TO 25 ARE RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045 26. SRI T P GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKA PAPANNA, 27. SMT GOWRAMMA W/O SRI T P GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

28. SRI NAGESHA S/O SRI T P GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

493

RESPONDENTS 26 TO 28 R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. LOHITSWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. B.E. SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. N.BYRE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R6 TO R17, R19, R23 TO R25, R27 AND R28; SMT. USHA GOPALA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER

DATED 29.06.2007 PASSED BY THE R-2 WHEREIN THE CLAIMS

MADE BY THE SOCIETY AND THE ORIGINAL LAND OWNER IN

RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY NO. 17/8, 21/2, 20/4, 18/1,

18/4, 18/5, 17/10A, 16/10A, 16/11B, 23/1, 23/3, 95/3

SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI,

BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND GRANT BENEFIT OF THE 40:60

SCHEME TO THE PETITIONERS AS FOUND IN ANNEXURE -V TO

THE W.P. AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.9190/2018:

BETWEEN:

SALETH MARY 57992 W/O. PATRICK PETER, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS #4, 2ND BLOCK, DASAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,

494

BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE-560 016.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. M. G. JAVEED AHMED KHAN, ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARY, MULTI-STORIED BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH RAOD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF


IMPLEMENT THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT

ANNEXURE-C WHILE FORMING THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND

495

ALLOTING THE SAME TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT

INTERFERING WITH THE SITE OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.12221/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI.N.SESHAGIRI RAO S/O LATE N.S.NAGARAJARAO, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2. SRI RAGHAVENDRA MURTHY S/O LATE N.S. NAGARAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 3. SRI.ANANTHA MURTHY S/O LATE N.S. NAGARAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS ALL THE ABOVE ARE R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560045

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. G.A. MITHUN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G. D. ASWATHANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

496

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, R.T.NAGAR DIVISION, BANGALORE -560 039 3. JAI HIND SPORTS ACADEMY REPRESENTED BY SRI VENKATASWAMY, S/O KUMMANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45 4. DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR YUVAKA SANGHA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.T.RAMESH, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45 5. BHUVANESWARI KANNADA SANGHA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.RAVI KUMAR PATEL, S/O JAYARAM DAS, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45 6. DR.RAJKUMAR ABHIMANIGALA SANGHA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.RAVI KUMAR PATEL, S/O JAYARAM DAS, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST,

BANGALORE-45

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR

497

SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; R3 SERVED; R4 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER

DATED 06.01.2018 IN O.S.NO. 8856/2012 PASSED BY THE

LEARNED XXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,

BANGALORE ON I.A. NO.11 VIDE ANNEXURE - A AND ENABLE

THE PLAINTIFFS TO CARRY OUT THE AMENDMENT AS SOUGHT

FOR AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.12792/2018: BETWEEN: 1. MRS. NIDHYA XAVIER AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D/O A.M.M.S. XAVIER, R/O PLOT NO.24, 'ROYAL ENCLAVE ENTENSION', 'KALAKRUTHI AVENUE', INJAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 041 REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.LINUS MARIADOSS AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE MR. JOSEPH VEDANAYAGAM, R/O NO.44/30, 5TH CROSS, GRACE TOWN, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560043 THE SECOND PETITIONER HEREIN 2. MR. LINUS MARIADOSS AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE MR. JOSEPH VEDANAYAGAM, R/O NO.44/30, 5TH CROSS, GRACE TOWN, HENNUR MAIN ROAD,

498

BENGALURU-560043 ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. S. V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-20 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHI KUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY R-2 DATED 03.02.2003 IN TERMS OF SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT VIDE ANNEX - W AND THE NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 IN TERMS OF SEC. 19(1) OF THE ACT IN SO FAR AS THEY RELATES TO SITE NUMBERS 15, 16 AND 17 CARVED OUT OF LAND IN SY. NO. 5 OF GEDDLAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK VIDE ANNEX - X; DATED 23.02.2004 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.25302/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B. CHANDRA SHEKAR HEBBAR S/O LAKSHMINARAYANA HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A BIADY VILLAGE

KOTESHWARA POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA-576222 2. SRI. L. G. SHESHADRI VASAN

499

S/O L. GOVINDA RAO AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1351 "GOVINDA NILAYA", 5TH MAIN 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGARA BANGALORE-560010 3. SRI MOHAMMED ZAMEER S/O KHAJA MAIHUDDIN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.118 "MUMTAZ MANIZIL", 4TH MAIN OPP ADESHWAR ELECTRONICS GANGANAGARA BANGALORE - 560 032 4. SMT LEELAVATI R HEGDE W/O R. G. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO.20, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 010 5. SRI. CHANDRU M S/O MUNIANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A NO.34, 12TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-560024 6. SRI. GOPAL. M S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NO.2114, D BLOCK 9TH MAIN, SAHAKARNAGARA BANGALORE-560092 7. SMT T. R. PADMA MURTHY W/O T. R. KRISHNA MURTHY

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A NO.4, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAYOUT BHUVANESHWARINAGARA

500

KEMPAPURA DASARAHALLI BANGALORE-560024 8. SMT. K. KUSUMA GANAPATHY D/O M. K. MUNNAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS NO.11, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAYOUT BHUVANESHWARINAGARA, KEMPAPURA DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE-560024 9. SMT. MANGALA PRAKASH W/O SRI JAYAPRAKASH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.231, V MAIN 6TH PHASE, INDUSTRIAL TOWN RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE 10. SRI R. MANOHAR S/O M. R. RAJASHEKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.26, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN VASANTHAPPA BLOCK, GANGANAGARA BANGALORE-560032 11. SRI M. K. RAGHAVAN S/O LATE KUNJAN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.60, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAOUT HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-560024.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. M. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

501

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 4. SRI. B.P. RAJESH S/O LATE B. R. PANDU RANGA GUPTA R/A NO.8, GOVINDARAJU STREET SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME KNOWN AS " ARKAVATHI LAYOUT" IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO. 78, MEASURING 2 ACRES OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK NOW BANGALORE EAST TALUK, AS LAPSED AND TO GRANT CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF/S THERETO AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26667/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SMT PILLAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, W/O LATE A. M. MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.412, NEAR AYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE, JAKKUR LAYOUT,

BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 2. SMT GOWRAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA,

502

W/O MUNIHUCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT BETTENAHALLI, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. TULSAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, W/O LAKSHMAIAH GUNI AGRAHARA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT HESSARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 4. SRI M. GOPAL S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, GANGAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, BALAPPA LAYOUT, AMRUTHAHALLI, BENGALURU-560092 5. BHAGYAMMA D/O. LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, W/O PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT HESANAGHATTA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LEELADHAR H. P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA,

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

503

KUMARA PARK, BELLARY ROAD, ( T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020) 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK, BELLARY ROAD, ( T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020)

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SPECIAL GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND 2 UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS LAND IS CONCERNED IN SL NO. 660 OF THE FINAL NOTIFICATION UNDER ANNEXURE - A AND QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND 2 UNDER SECTION 17[1] OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS LAND IS CONCERNED IN SL.NO.112 OF THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.27750/2018: BETWEEN: 1. MR. JAYARAM S. AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE SUBBAIAH, 2. SMT M KANTHAMANI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O. MR.JAYARAM, 3. MR. J. VARUN

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O MR.JAYARAM, ALL ARE R/AT MARIAMMA TEMPLE, OLD POLICE STATION ROAD,

504

KADUGONDANAHALLI A.C.POST, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560045.

...PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUNITHA H. SINGH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. THANUJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.27947/2018:

BETWEEN: SMT SHARADA S. SHETTY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

505

W/O LATE A.SADANANDA SHETTY, R/AT NO.206, SAHARA GRANDEUR APARTMENT, AMRUTHANAGAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560092.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF


RESPONDENT NO.2 TO FORTHWITH ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE

TO THE PETITIONER AS SOUGHT FOR IN ANNEXURE - B AND

ETC.

IN W.P.NO.30106/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SMT P. V. MANJULA SRINIVAS W/O DR. SAKEY SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.1,TYPE-IV QUARTERS, IVRI,HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560 024

506

2. DR. P. V. SHIVAKUMAR S/O P V RAGHU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.32,HMT LAYOUT, 80 FEET ROAD EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560 032

3. SMT G. RAJINI DEVI W/O P. V. MOHAN BABU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.E-11 STREET, BROADWAY ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 051

4. SMT P C NANDA W/O P R CHANDAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.4,"D" 2ND STREET, BROADWAY ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 051

5. SRI V NAGARAJ S/O LATE P VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.7,2ND FLOOR, G NO.11TH STREET, JOGUPALYAM, HALASURU, BENGALURU-560 008

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE ) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020

507

3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3 VAKALATH FILED FOR R3 ONLY) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNX -Y DATED 03.02.2203 IN NOTIFICATION FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANNEX - Y AND Y1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.38977/2018: BETWEEN 1. ASHWINI DAYAL TAWAKLEY S/O LATE BISHAN DAYAL TAWAKLEY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. VINITA TAWAKLEY W/O ASHWINI DAYAL TAWAKLEY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.73, ETON AVENUE WEMBLEY MIDDLESEC HAO 3AZ UNITED KINGDOM. ALSO AT GATEWAY HOTEL NO.66 RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)

508

AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ARKAVATHY LAYOUT RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO. 218, HOUSE LIST KHATHA NO. 28/218. MEASURING 70 X 65 FEET SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLY VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.39615/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S. KRISHNAMURTHY SON OF LATE SHESHACHAR, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4/14, QUARTERS IVRI, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 2. SRI. K. T. RAMESHKUMAR SON OF LATE SRI. A. K. THIRUVENGADAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO. 412, GROUND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN, 4TH "D" CROSS, HRBR LAYOUT,

509

2ND BLOCK, KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043. 3. K. T. GEETHA SAMPATHKUMARI D/O. LATE A. K. THIRUVENGADAM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 213, "MALATHI NILAYAM", 7TH "B" MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043. 4. SRI. C. SHIVAMADAV SON OF C. SHANKARRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYAPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KODUR (RS), CUDDAPH DISTRICT, A.P. PIN: 516 101. 5. SRI. K. RADHAKRISHNAN SON OF LATE SRI. C. BHASKARAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 3/1, IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 6. SRI. N. JAIRAJ SON OF LATE V. NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 241, 7TH MAIN, PILLANNA GARDEN, 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 045. 7. SMT. SUJATHA WIFE OF M. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYPALLI, VILLAGE AND POST, KODUR (RS), CUDDAPH DISTRICT,

510

A.P., PIN-516 101. 8. SRI. GOLLA RAMALINGA REDDY SON OF GOLLA PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 9. SMT. V. RAMA WIFE OF DR. V. V. SURYANARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 10. MR. MATHEW P. THOMAS SON OF LATE REV. FR. P.C. THOMAS, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.31, "THANALI", 2ND CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, DASAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 016. 11. SMT. DEEPA MATHUR WIFE OF A. M. MATHUR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 12. DR. SATHYANARAYANA SAHA SON OF LATE MR. SHARATCHANDRA SAHA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT N.5, "SHARATH", 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, PAMPA EXTENSION, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.

13. SMT. S. MALATHI WIFE OF SRI. T. SANNATH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 213,

511

"MALATHI NILAYAM", 7TH "B" MAIN, HRBR LAYOUT, 2ND BLOCK, KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043. 14. SMT. SAMBARU KRISHNAVENI WIFE OF DR. K. GANESH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 27, GANESH NILAYA, 11TH CROSS, GANGANAGARA NORTH, BANGALORE-560 024.

15. SMT. LEELAVATHI WIFE OF SRI. S. R. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 27, 24TH "A" CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, 1ST MAIN, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064.

16. SMT. C. SUSHEELA WIFE OF SHANKAR RAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KODUR (RS) CUDDAPH DISTRICT, A.P. PIN: 516 101. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA, HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

512

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE -T AND ANOTHER NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE - S AND T AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.48266/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O NARAYANAPPA, R/AT SAMPIGE HALLI, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560064

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,M S BUILDING, BENGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE- 560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001

513

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY,SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS PER ANNEXURE - H TO THE W.P. IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53051/2018: BETWEEN: SRI R. M. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH, R/AT NO.925/A, 3RD B CROSS, H.R.B.R. I BLOCK, KALYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. VANAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

514

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -D DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-D AND THEN TO DECLARE THAT, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION, DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEXURES - E & F CEASES TO EXIST AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53250/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI JOSEPH M MARIRAJ S/O MARIRAJ AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 2. SMT SUJATHA MARIRAJ W/O JOSEPH MARIRAJ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS BOTH ARE R/O D NO.49 ROBERSON ROAD FRAIZER TOWN BENGALURU-560 005

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST

BENGALURU-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

515

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DILDAR SHIRALLI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO. 83/1 HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN PAGES 155-164, AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN PAGES 51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND H ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SEC.24[2] OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITIATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56686/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SHAHEEN FATHIMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O MR MOHAMMED YOUSUFF RESIDING AT NO.5/1 STEPHENS ROAD FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI. B. M. MADAPPA 2. MRS NAGEENA BEGUM AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS W/O MR AMMANULLAH KHAN R/AT NO.8 AHMED SET ROAD

FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI B. M. MADAPPA

516

3. MR. FIYAZ AHMED AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB R/AT NO.40/2 STANDAGE ROAD FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI B. M. MADAPPA 4. MR. SANAULLAH KHAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O RASHEEDULLAH KHAN R/AT 8 AHMED SET ROAD FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI B. M. MADAPPA

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST

BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

517



NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS

ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - M IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS

AND THEIR SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.2939/2019: BETWEEN: JOSEPH THOMAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. THOMAS POTHAN, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT "THOPPIL KANDATHIL", 10TH KILOMETER STONE, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, KALYANNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 043.

...PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUVARNA M.L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

518

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.09.2018 (UNDER ANNEXURE -J TO THE WRIT PETITION) ISSUED BY THE R-3 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DE-NOTIFY/DROP FROM ACQUISITION LAND BEARING SY.NO.10 OF GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK MEASURING 4.04 GUNTAS OWNED BY THE PETITIONER AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8325/2019: BETWEEN: NOREEN AHMED D/O.AMEER AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.12, 6TH CROSS, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION, BENGALURU.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

519

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.83/1, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE PM 03.02.2003 IN PAGES 155-164 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN PAGES 51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE -J AND L ISSUED BY R2 AND R1 RESPECTIVELY ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SEC. 24[2] OF THE RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8329/2019: BETWEEN: NAVEEN ALEEM W/O ABDUL ALEEM AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O 12, 6TH CROSS, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION BENGALURU. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUAMRA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

520

KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.R. VANAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.83/1, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE PM 3/2/2003 IN PAGES 155-164 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN PAGES 51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND J ISSUED BY R2 AND R1 RESPECTIVELY ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SEC. 24[2] OF THE RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.12093/2019: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DHAKSHAYINI

W/O LATE S.G. SIKHARANNA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

RESIDING AT NO 359 6TH MAIN ROAD

7TH BLOCK 2ND STAGE NAGARBHAVI, BENGALURU - 560 072.

2. MR. B.S. JAGADISH S/O LATE S.G. SIKHARANNA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 359 6TH MAIN ROAD, 7TH BLOCK 2ND STAGE, NAGARBHAVI BENGALURU - 560 072. … PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE)

521


REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA

BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.


BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

4. THE COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020


BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.

6. MR. K.K. ANANTHNARAYAN

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O K.N. KESHAVA RESIDING AT NO 914 LAKSHMI NILAYA, 1ST STAGE 2ND CROSS, BEHIND SOLOMON APARTMENTS CHANDRA LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 072.

7. MR. L. HARISH

S/O R. LAKSHMIKANTH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT SHREE KABIR

522

ASHRAM, 8TH CROSS H SIDDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS INSTITUTED UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DTD 03.02.2003 FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT VIDE ANNX-E AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNX-G TO HAVE BEEN ABANDONED AND LAPSED AND HENCE HAVE BECOME INOPERATIVE IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED. IN W.P.NO.15096/2019: BETWEEN: SRI. SATEESH PILLAI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O SRI.PARAMESHWARAN PILLAI PRESENTLY R/AT NO.82, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, BAGALUR ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE-560 084. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

523

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHAHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS ANNEXURE - D AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15199/2019: BETWEEN: SRI. E. LOKESH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O SRI ESHWAR MURTHY PRESENTLY R/AT NO.22, IST CROSS, SANJEEVA REDDY STREET, ANJENARAYANAPPA LAYOUT SUBBANAPALYA BANGALORE-560033

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR ROAD

BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPEMNT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

524

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPEMNT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIOENRS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS " ANNEXURE -D " AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15531/2019: BETWEEN: SRI. NAVANITHA KRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O. SRI. RAMADURAI, PRESENTLY NO.34, 1ST FLOOR, 'KRISHNA BUILDING', DAYANANDA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 016. ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

525

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR

AS THE PETITIOENRS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED

MARKED AS " ANNEXURE -D " AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.15532/2019: BETWEEN: MR. A. H. SHOAIB MOHAMMED AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O SRI. S.A. ABVDUL HAMEED PRESENTLY R/AT NO.57, 4TH CROSS, KANAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560032. (BY HIS GPA HOLDER SMT. YASMEEN ABDUL HAMEED, AGED 59 YEARS W/O S.A. ABDUL HAMEED, R/OF NO.57, 4TH CROSS, R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE)

526

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTEMTN OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN SOF AR AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS " ANNEXURE - C " AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15534/2019: BETWEEN: SMT. ALLI RAJENDRAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O SRI. K. RAJENDRAN PRESENTLY R/AT NO.57, 4TH CROSS KANAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE)

527

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMNT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS ANNEXURE -D AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26852/2019: BETWEEN: 1. SMT MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS 2. SMT RATHNAMMA D/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

3. SRI APPAIAH S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

528

4. SMT NEELAMMA W/O LATE MUNIRAJU S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 5. SMT SAROJAMMA W/O LATE MUNISWAMY S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 6. SMT SHOBHA W/O LATE MUNIKRISHNA S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 7. SRI K. GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE M. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 8. SMT. NARAYANAMMA D/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 9. SRI. GANGADHAR S/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF #210/211 MUNIRAJU COMPOUND AMRUTHAHALLI MAIN ROAD SAHAKARANAGARA POST BENGALURU-560 092

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJAGOPAL M. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001

2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHRORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD

529

KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 3. THE SEPCIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION INITIATED BY ISSUING THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY R-2 AS PER ANNEXURE -F, FOLLOWED BY THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 AS PER ANNEXURE - G AND THE RE-DO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AS PER ANNEXURE-H IS LAPSED AND THE PROVISIONS UNDER THE BENGALURU PARTICULARLY SECTION 36(30) IS INAPPLICABLE BY APPLYING SECTION 27 OF THE SAID ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.50257/2019: BETWEEN: 1. NARAYANASWAMY S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. MUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. CHANDRA S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF

THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 016

530

REPT. BY THEIR G.P.A. HOLDER, SYED AKMAL PASHA, S/O. SYED ABDUL RAWOOF, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.157/2, NEHRUPURAM, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 001.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A. KUMARAVEL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH ARE PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE -G AND H RESPECTIVELY IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.10568/2015: BETWEEN: MR. A. ALBERT ANTHONY S/O LATE J ANTHONY

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT # SITE NUMBER - 2 HOUSE LIST KHATHA NO. 228/2 K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI

531

BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD K. P. WEST BANGALORE-560 020 2. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R T NAGAR BANGALORE-560032 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R. T. NAGAR BANGALORE-560032 5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION HAVING NUMBER DATED 03.02.2003 A TRUE

532

COPY IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION HAVING DATED 23.02.2004 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE - B AND ALSO 2ND FRESH FINAL NOTIFICATION HAVING DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -C AS THEY ARE LAPSED AND ALSO THAT THEY ARE BAD IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15003/2013: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KANTHI HEGDE W/O. S.M. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O "KANTHI" NO. 13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020. 2. SRI. HARSHA HEGDE S/O. S.M. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O "KANTHI" NO. 13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. SMT. RASHMI HEGDE D/O S.M. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O " KANTHI" NO. 13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR P A HOLDER SMT. KANTHI HEGDE …PETITIONERS (SRI. S.M. HEGDE KADAVE, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT

533

M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE -560 020 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER ALLOTTING A CA SITE IN FAVOUR OF HENNUR POLICE STATION DATED 11.02.2010 UNDER ANN - X NUMBERING NIL IN SO FAR AS IT RELATE TO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER, BDA AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14874/2014: BETWEEN: SMT BHARATHI SHIVAKUMAR W/O SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.16 5TH CROSS, HOYSALA LAYOUT SRIRAMAPURA MAIN ROAD AMURTHAHALLI SAHAKARANAGARA POST BANGALORE - 560092

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. S. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)

534

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 4. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF


ACQUISITION OF THE LAND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN

PURSUANCE OF THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004

VIDE ANN - L, STOOD LAPSED IN SO FAR AS THE PETITION

SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.


M/S SOBHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANYS ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE

535

AT DEVARABISANAHALLI SARJAPUR-MARATHAHALI OUTER RING ROAD BELLANDUR POST BANGALORE-560103 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SMT. PADMAVATHI V

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVANA K. G. ROAD BANGALORE-560009 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT M. S. BUIDLING BANGALORE - 560 001 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 4. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, GUTTAHALLI BANGALORE-560020 5. ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. T.P. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY, ADVOCATE AND

SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE R-3 AND R-4 TO DE-NOTIFY THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY FROM

536

THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANN-AJ IN SO FAR AS RESIDENTIALLY CONVERTED IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IN SY.NO.30 MEASURING 1 ACRE 12 GUNTAS OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.42498/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. AVINASH S/O A ANAND AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.10A, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 2. SRI ANJANKUMAR S/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.3, 13TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 3. SMT CHAYADEVI D/O SRI HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.11A, 13TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 4. SRI ASHWIN J. S. S/O SRIKANTA S AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.1 & 4 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

5. SMT SUMITHRA SATHISH W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.1A, 13TH A CROSS

537

JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 6. SRI MUNIHANUMAIAH S/O MUNIHANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.16A, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 7. SMT GOWRAMMA W/O SADAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.10A, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 8. SRI BYRAPPA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.10, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 9. SRI SOMASHEKAR S/O SONAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.9, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 10. SRI MANJUNATH G S/O A GOPAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.3 AND 4 12TH A CROSS

JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

538

11. SRI A NARAYANASWAMY S/O AVALAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.8, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 12. SMT SHOBHA W/O UDAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.14, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 13. SMT AMINABI W/O BASHA B AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.18, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 14. RAVISHANKAR BHAVE S/O M V BHAVE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.13, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

15. SMT RAJAESHWARI W/O. M. C. BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.7, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. H. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SUMITHRA G.M., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

539

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BANGALORE

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 20

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 20 4. SRI ANJENE GOWDA S/O LATE PILLAPPA AND SMT. LATE MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 5. SRI. BYRAPPA S/O. SRI NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 6. P. RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O LATE PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE R2 & R3; SRI. AMAREESH A ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. N JAI PRAKASH RAO, ADVOCATE AND SRI. B. SRINIVASGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SKETCH ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO R-6 DATED 03.10.2011 VIDE ANNEX - A BY EXCLUDING THE LAND OF THE

540

R-4 TO R-6 FROM THE ACQUISITION AND INCLUDED THE LAND TO THE EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 26 GUNTAS IN WHICH PETITIONERS CONSTRUCTED THEIR RESIDENTIAL HOUSES IN THE ACQUISITION AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.45230/2014: BETWEEN S. HEMAVATHI W/O LAKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 168, 2ND CROSS, 3RD PHASE, 1ST MAIN, MANJUNATHANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE -1 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE -20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION BANGALORE -20 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX, R.T. NAGAR

BANGALORE -20 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX

541

R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE -20. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH DECLARE THAT

THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY SITUATED IN SY.NO.40 (PRESENT

SY.NO.40/P1P1) AND NOT BEING PART OF THE LANDS NOTIFIED

FOR ACQUSITION EITHER UNDER THE PRELIMINARY OF FINAL

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 & 22.03.2004 VIDE ANNX - K &

L UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) OF THE BANGALORE

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2003 AND

U/S 19 OF THE B.D.A ACT 1976 DATED 22.03.2004, THE

RESPONDENTS HAVE NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ACT IN

RESPECT OF THE SAME IN ANY MANNER THE PROPERTY

PRESENTLY COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE BBMP

AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.47606/2014: BETWEEN: SRI P. VENUGOPAL S/O P.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT 'MAHATE', NO.72/1, 3RD MAIN, 16TH CROSS, G.D. PARK EXTENSION, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE-560 003.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PATIL JAI M., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,

542

BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2014) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE LANDS WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT (RFD), IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (ANNX - K TO THE W.P.) IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AS AGAINST SY.NOS 45/5 & 45/6 IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT ANY ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS AND UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE PETITIONER SO FAR AS PETITIONER SCHEDULE LAND (PROPERTY) AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.47607/2014: BETWEEN: SMT. P. CHANDRAKALA W/O P. VENUGOPAL,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/A. 'MAHATE' NO.72/1, 3RD MAIN, 16TH CROSS,

543

G.D PARK EXTENSION, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE - 560 003

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2014) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF


LANDS WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE

DEVELOPMENT (RFD) IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT

(VIDE ANNX -K TO THE W.P.) AS AGAINST SY.NOS. 45/5 & 45/6 IS

WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT ANY ACQUISITION

544

PROCEEDINGS AND UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE

PETITIONER SO FAR AS PETITIONER SCHEDULE LAND

(PROPERTY) AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.58829/2014: BETWEEN: 1. CAPT. LAKSHMANAN VELLIKATH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE V KUNHIRAMAN, RESIDING AT HOUSENO.48 AND 49, SY NO.97/2,I CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 2. COL N. R. BALARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANA RAO, RESIDING AT NO.6, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 3. SRI. V. M. SATHISH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O SRI V V MADAVAN, RESDIIDNG AT NO.57, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 4. SRI J. N. NAVEEN, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, S/O LATE J. NARAYANAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.70, SY NO.97/2,1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 5. SRI GANESH HEGDE AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA HEGDE,

545

6. SMT.SANDHYA GANESH HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SRIGANESH HEGDE, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.55, SY NO.97/2,1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 7. SMT. CHANNAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, W/O KAKAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.172,1ST FLOOR, L K RAJU BUILDING, 1ST MAIN,MILK COLONY, SUBRAMANYANAGAR, BANGLORE-560 010. 8. SRI VISHWANATH N V AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.63, SY NO.97/2,1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 9. SMT SHASHIKALA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, W/O LATE K LAKSHMINARAYANA, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.63, SY NO.97/1, 3RD CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 10. SMT. SANDHYA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SRI GANESH HEGDE, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.55, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 11. SMT. P BANUMATHI

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMESH BABU, RESIDING AT NO.3641, 13 'B' MAIN ROAD,

546

H.A.L., BANGALORE-560 038. 12. SMT MEENA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O LATE MUNIRAJ, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.45, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 13. SRI GOPAL C., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O CHANNAPPA, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.18 AND 19, SY NO.97/1, 4TH CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 14. SRI. A. G. RAMAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 15. SMT.K LAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.118, 8TH A CROSS, PRASHANTHNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 079.

...PETITIONERS (BY SMT. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K. P. WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

547

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K. P. WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BDA ACT VIDE ANN-K IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LANDS IN SY.NO. 97/2 AND 97/1 MEASURING 2 ACRES 36 GUNTAS AND 4 ACRES 37 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2935/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. MOHAMMED AJAZ SHERRIFF SON OF ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.9, AGA ABDULLA STREET, RICHMOND STREET, BANGALORE-560 025.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESETNED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001

2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

548

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUSITION), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 T0 R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND DECLARE

THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003

PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003

VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE

ANN - D, FINAL NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA

GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E, AWARDS DATED

18.10.2004 VIDE ANN-F & G, AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR

DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN - K

AND L, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVE

LAPSED BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION

24[2] OF RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN

LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT

2013 AND ETC.


MOHAMMED FIAZ SHARIFF SON OF ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.9,

549

AGA ABDULLA STREET, RICHMOND STREET, BANGALORE-560 025.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND DECLARE THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE

ANN - D, FINAL NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E, AWARDS DATED 18.10.2004 VIDE ANN-F & G, AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN - K AND L, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVE

550

LAPSED BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2937/2015: BETWEEN: SRI NAQHI R S/O BABU SAB AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 9, AGA ABDULLA STREET, RICHMOND STREET, BANGALORE-560 025

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

4. THE LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

551

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND DECLARE

THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003

PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003

ISSUED BY R-2 VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED

23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANN-D, FINAL NOTIFICATION

PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014

ISSUED BY R1 VIDE ANN-E, AWARDS DATED 18.10.2004 VIDE

ANN -F & G, ISSUED BY R-4 AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR

DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN -K

AND L, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVE

LAPSED BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION

24[2] OF RIGHT TO AIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN

LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT

2013 AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.6225/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. HARISH PRABHU B. G. S/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNA PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 2. SRI SATISH PRABHU B G S/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNA PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT: NO.3525/2/69/3, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, VIRUPAKSHAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 036

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND

552

SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SECRETARY THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3 STATE GOVT. IMPLEADED AS PARTY AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 20/01/2016) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE OFFICIALS OF THE RESPONDENTS OF BDA NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS THE SAME IS NOT ACQUIRED FOR THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.7038/2015: BETWEEN: SRI D. RAMANAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SON OF LATE D. KOTESWARA RAO, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.45/D1 OLD MARKET ROAD, CANTONMENT,

BELLARY-583 104 ...PETITIONER


553

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSINOER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 4. SRI SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, 5. SRI. KANDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. MUNISHAMAPPA, 6. SRI. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA 7. SRI LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 018

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7)

554



ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO

7 DATED 08.01.2005 VIDE ANN - R AND QUASH THE

ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO

7 DATED 31.05.2012 VIDE ANN - U AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.7322/2015: BETWEEN: 1. DR. RENUKA DEVI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS W/O DR. H. S. PRABHAKARA 2. DR H. S. PRABHAKARA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS BOTH RESIDING AT NO.389, 1ST FLOOR, F BLOCK SAHAKARNAGAR BANGALORE - 560 092

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS

COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

555

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE BANGALORE

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ISSUE AN ENDORSEMENT IN

FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS ON THE SAME TERMS AS

ENDORSEMENT DATED 09.03.2012 (ANNX -J) ISSUED IN

RESPECT OF ADJACENT SITE NOS. 65 & SITE NO.20 SITUATED

IN SY.NO. 79, DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK

CONFIRMING THAT THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS NOT PART OF

THE ACQUIRED PORTION OF THE LAND AND GRANT ALL

CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.8111/2015: BETWEEN: SMT. DEVI VISWANATHAN W/O T. VISWANATHAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/A NO.1590, 8TH STREET KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, IST STAGE NEAR DAYANANDA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-560078

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

556

M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX - G) IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.83/4 OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TO., BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO. 575 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8112/2015: BETWEEN: SRI T. VISWANATHAN S/O P N THIRUGANANASAMBANDAM AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1590, 8TH STREET KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, IST STAGE NEAR DAYANANDA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-560 078

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE)

557

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-G) IN SO FAR AS IT

RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.83/4

OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE. K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE

EAST TQ., BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO. 575 OF

THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED

18.06.2014 AND ETC.


SRI. H. V. RAJESH S/O SRI. H. S. VARADARAJA IYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT

558

NO.100, 8TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM , BANGALORE - 03

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. H. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - F AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.21999/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT M. SHASHIKALA W/O SHRI RAMESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.218,

'SHASHIRA', TEACHERS COLONY, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560 072.

559

2. SMT.KALAVATHI BAI W/O SHRI. ROOP SINGH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.125, M.S.S.R NAGAR, MATHIKERE, BANGALORE-560 054. 3. SMT. JOHNSY BEULA W/O SHRI. ARTHUR SOLOMON, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, ANUJAY, CAUVERY STREET, ANJANEYASWAMY LAYOUT, THINDLU, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 097.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NITIN R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSISONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P.WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P.WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.


SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SECOND

560

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNX -H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.28675/2015: BETWEEN: SMT. K. NAVANEETHA W/O LATE K. SEETHARAM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.49, DVG ROAD GREEN GARDEN, III MAIN II PHASE, BANJARA LAYOUT HORAMAVU, KALKERE POST BENGALURU - 560 043

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPOMENT DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M. S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020


SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND R-1

561

& 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - P & Q RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.34826/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KANTHI HEGDE W/O S.M. HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O KANTHI, NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. SRI.HARSHA HEGDE S/O S.M. HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O KANTHI, NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SMT.RASHMI HEGDE D/O S.M.HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O KANTHI, NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR P A HOLDER SMT.KANTHI HEGDE R/O. KANTHI NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN PALACE CROSS ROAD

BANGALORE - 560 020 ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. YESHU MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.M. HEGDE KADAVE, ADVOCATE)

562

AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO SITE NOS. 3, 5, 7, 9 & 12 FORMED IN THE LAND BEARING SY.NO. 82/8 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ., VIDE ANNX -D AS STATED IN THE SCHEDULE ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59793/2015: BETWEEN: M/S. SOBHA PROJECTS AND TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956,

HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.23/1, SONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, BROOKE FIELD, MAHADEVAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 048 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

563

BY SMT. V. PADMAVATHI ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. MADHUKAR DESHAPANDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S.V.BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 03 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 03 4. SRI.MADHUSOODAN NAMBIAR S/O SRI.KUPPADAKATH RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR, AGED 56 YEARS, NO.1, CHRISTELLA VILLA, 206, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE-560 066

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. VISHWANATH R. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 UNDER SECTION 17[1] OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT,1976 [KARNATAKA ACT.NO.12

OF 1976] VIDE ANNEX -J IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.137/1 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE, OF WHICH THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMS PORT AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION VIDE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976

564

[KARNATAKA ACT NO.12 OF 1976] VIDE ANNEX - L IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.137/1 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE OF WHICH THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMS PORT IN THE ALTERNATIVELY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.1876/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. SARADA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A NO.44/2, 7TH CROSS 7TH MAIN, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE-560003

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D IN SO FAR AS

565

THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8603/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. DILIP PRABHAN S/O SRI R. PRABHAKAR MAJOR, RESIDING AT LAXMI NIVAS MAMANGALM, PALARIVATTON COCHIN-680025 KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMBIAR RAGHAVAN MADHUSOODAN S/O LATE SRI RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT CHRISTELLA VILLA NO.1 206, WHITEFIELD, MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-66

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. MANJUNATHA V RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-1 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 001


566



LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION BENGALURU DATED

03.02.2003 AT ANNEX - G AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION

VIDE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.8707/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. M. M. NAMBOODIRIPAD S/O SRI. NAMBOODIRI PAD, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS NOW RESIDING AT, APARTMENT C-403, MANASA ROYAL, OPPOSITE NARAYANANANDA YOGA ASHRAM,HINKAL, MYSORE-570 030. REPRESENTED BY HIS, POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, NAMBIAR RAGHAVAN MADHUSOODAN, MAJOR, S/O LATE SRI. RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR, RESIDING AT VILLA NO.1, CRISTALA,206, WHITE FIELD, MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-66.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR SAMANTH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. MANJUNATHA V. RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-01. 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGLAORE-560001.

567

3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF


LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AT ANNEX

-G AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION VIDE NOTIFICATION

DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.16505/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. BASAPPA S/O. LATE MUNIVEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS AMANIBYRATHIKANE K.R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST - 560 036 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST

568

BANGALORE - 560 020 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANASWADI DIVISION BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 043 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1-R4; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE -E INSOFAR AS

PETITIONER LAND AND DECLARE THAT THE LAND BEARING

SY.NO.5/2 AN EXTENT OF 0.34 GUNTAS NOTIFIED FOR

ACQUISITION IN THE YEAR 2004 FAIL TO TAKE POSSESSION AND

PASS AWARD AS PROVIDED UNDER THE STATUES

CONSEQUENTLY THE SCHEME IS LAPSED AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.20131/2016: BETWEEN: SRI JANAK RANJIT TOPRANI S/O SRI. RANJIT HARIDAS TOPRANI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT 311-312 SHEFFIELD TOWERS, 2ND CROSS LANE, LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX, ANDHERI WEST, MUMBAI-400 053.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

569

M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.20132/2016: BETWEEN: SRI JANAK RANJIT TOPRANI S/O SRI RANJIT HARIDAS TOPRANI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT 311-312 SHEFFIELD TOWERS, 2ND CROSS LANE, LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX, ANDHERI WEST, MUMBAI-400 053.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNTAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

570

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE -E ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 34947/2016: BETWEEN: 1. MR. MANSOOR PASHA N. S/O LATE NAWAB JAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT SITE BEARING NO.34, JANJAR NO.1433/1, KHATA NO.34, VIDYA SAGAR LAYOUT, THANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE. 2. MR.MOHAMMED FAROOQ S/O LATE GULAM HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 3. MRS. SHAKEELA BANU

W/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.35, JANJAR NO.1433D/1, KHATA NO.35, VIDYA SAGAR LAYOUT,

571

THANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE. 4. SMT.ALMAS W/O AMJAD PASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.19/3, 3RD FLOOR, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, BANGALORE-560 053. 5. SMT.MUBEEN TAJ W/O CHAND PASHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.44, KATHA NO.2812, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 6. MR.IMTIYAZ PASHA S/O MOHAMMED YACOOB, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.19/3, 1ST FLOOR, SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, BANGALORE-560 053.

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMEMT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.

572

4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGAORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT ANNEX - J AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.35309/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT ASMA BEGUM W/O. SYED EHTSHAMUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 66, K.H.M. BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, 4TH MAIN, BANGALORE - 560032 2. SMT. S. ANSARI BEGUM W/O. ABDUL MAJEED, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 75, PILLANNA GARDEN, 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE - 560084 3. SMT. ZEENATHI JAN WIFE OF LATE. MOHAMMED SAMIULLA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO. 9, 4TH-B-CROSS,

16TH STREET, CHANDINI CHOWK ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560001

573

4. SRI. S. SELVARAJ S/O. B. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 218, RAMACHANDRAPPA LAYOUT, KARIYANNAPALYA, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE - 560084 5. SRI. A NELSON MARIANATHAN S/O. A AUGUSTINE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 314/5, C-BLOCK, AMBEDKARNAGAR, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045 6. SMT. AISHA JHAN WIFE OF MOHAMMED AKRAM AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 185, 4TH MAIN, SRIRAMPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 021

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 021 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;

574

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BYTHE R-1 AT ANNX -H BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANNX - H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.39427/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. FAROOK KHAN S/O. AYAZ GHANI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.43, INFANTRY ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SMT. JABEEN TAJ D/O. NAZEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 632, CHUNCHAPPA BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 062.

...PETITIONERS (BY S. V. ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER BDA, KUMARA PARK, BENGALURU-560 020.

575

3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BDA, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR AND SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE - E) AND ALSO

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ( ANNEXURE -G) ISSUED

BY R-1 & 2 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE

CONCERNED AS ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL ULTRA - VIRES

AND OPPOSED TO ALL CANNONS OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL

JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.47965/2016: BETWEEN: M/S. CONNEXIONS L.P.G. AND ACCESSORIES A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM CONSTITUTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: NO.116, P & T COLONY, R.T. NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 032. AND HAVING ITS GODOWN AT: SITE BEARING NOS. 1, 1/A & 1/B, HOUSE LIST NO.99, KHATHA NO. 384/A, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 084,

REPRESENTED BY DULY AUTHORIZED PARTNER: MR. T. RAMU, S/O. LATE SRI. MADHAVA NAIDU T., AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,

576

NO.116, P & T COLONY, R.T. NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 032.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANESH BHAT Y. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -T AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.51142/2016: BETWEEN: MRS. SHERIN MICHAEL AGED 55 YEARS, WIFE OF MR. PRAKASH EARNEST MICHAEL RESIDING AT NO.26, 1ST MAIN, 2ND & 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,

577

K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077.

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.55666/2016:

BETWEEN: SRI. S. G. JAYADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF SRI. S.GANGA SETTY,

578

NO.82, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL AND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020







NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL,

WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE,

IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

579

IN W.P.NO.57150/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KARTHIGEYAN JAYARAJ S/O SRI R JAYARAJ, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO.49, IST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETATY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO. 31,

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -M IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

580

IN W.P.NO.57245/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. MAHESH C., AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, SON OF SRI. V. S. CHANDRASEGARAM NO.45, 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE

ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL,

581

WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.58220/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. M. J. VEERESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF SRI. S.M. JAYANNA NO.23, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.


SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

582

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEXURE -K] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.58223/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. SIMON LAWRENCE AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF SRI. PETER JOSEPH NO.138, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020


583







NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL,


HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.58362/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. SAGAYI RAJU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SON OF SRI. JOSEPH, NO. 40, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

584

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.062014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59167/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. C. CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHINNAPPA NO.44, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

585

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO. 31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT AL NO. 251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE -J] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN -OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59169/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. R. JAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS WIFE OF LATE V RAJU NO 114, 8TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560001

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 002

586

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560002

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.61955/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. A. AROCKIA DASS AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SON OF LATE A. AROCKIA SWAMY NO. 51, 2ND MAIN CHANDRA SHEKAR LAYOUT K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

587

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560002

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE -K] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.63205/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. I. AROKIA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SON OF LATE R. ISSAC NO 93, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560077

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560001

588

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31 GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2531/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ASHA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS W/O N. KRISHNA RAO, RESIDENT OF NO.19/1 (OLD NO.10/1) 1ST FLOOR,9TH CROSS, SWIMMING POOL EXTENSION, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003 2. HARISH KHANNA

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O K. L. KHANNA, RESIDENT OF NO.E702,

589

RAINBOW VISTA, IDL ROAD, KUKKATPALLY, HYDERABAD-500 072 3. I. K. KHANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS SON OF M. L. KHANNA, RESIDENT OF NO.GA SHARAMALAYA II PRITHVI AVENUE, 2ND STREET,ABHIRAMAPURAM, CHENNAI-600 018

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5209/2017:

BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T. X. MATHEWS S/O LATE XAVIER AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

590

2. MRS. USHA MATHEWS W/O MR. T. X. MATHEWS AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS BOTH AT NO.41 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS GEDDALAHALLI K. NARYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31 GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,

INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

591

IN W.P.NO.5212/2017:

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. PRAVEENA SHREE E. D/O M. EKAMBARAM AGED 36 YEARS

2. SMT. BRINDA E. SURESH D/O M EKAMBARAM AGED 33 YEARS

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.63, 1ST MAIN 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE

592

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L PASSED BY R-1 IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.

IN W.P.NO.37478/2017:

BETWEEN:

SMT. GEETHA W/O. SUDHAKAR HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT 43 NISARGH, 3RD MAIN ROAD M. M. S. LAYOUT VIDHYARANYAPURA,


(BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

593

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PRL.NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX -G & H ISSUED BY R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SEC.24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT 30/2013) AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN VIEW OF THE DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SEC. 24(2) OF THE NEW ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.37480/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. K. NALINI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O. P KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT 242 NEW NO.230 A.K.COLONY,B.S.A.ROAD CROSS, NEAR LITTLE BOBBIN SCHOOL, BANGALORE-560 005

...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

594

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.03 THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-H, ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT 30 OF 2013) AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN VIEW OF THE DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE NEW ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.19783/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. R. BHAGYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O. SRI. R. SHYAMPRASAD REDDY, 2. R. SHYAM PRASAD REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O. LATE. R T MALLAREDDY, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AT FLAT NO. 702, SAI KUTEER APARTMENT, SY. NO. 2/1, VIDYANAGAR, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, DR. SHIVARAMAKARANTH POST,

BENGALURU 560077. ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. C M NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)

595

AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. REP BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560020.



ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED VIDE PRELIMINARY

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003, ISSUED UNDER SECTION

17(1) OF THE BDA ACT, 1976 VIDE ANNEX -E BY THE R-2 &

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-F ISSUED BY THE

R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE

CONCERNED AS LAPSED, IN VIEW OF SECTION 27 OF THE

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT AND ETC.

THESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND

RESERVED FOR ORDERS, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

596

ORDER

In all these writ petitions, challenge is laid to the

Preliminary Notification No.BDA/CMMR/KLAO/LA19/

104/2002-03, BANGALORE, dated 03.02.2003, Final

Notification No.UDD 193 MNX 2004, BANGALORE, dated

23.02.2004 and revised/modified Notification bearing No.UDD

426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE dated 18.06.2014 issued under

Section 17(1) & (3) and sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the

Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (for short ‘BDA

Act’) respectively for the purposes of wit for the formation of

Layout called “ARKAVATI LAYOUT” at Bengaluru.

BRIEF HISTORY:

2. The Bangalore Development Authority (for short

‘BDA’) issued a Preliminary Notification under Section 17(3) of

the BDA Act for acquisition of 3339 acres of land for formation

of Arkavati Layout on 03.02.2003. A modified Preliminary

Notification came to be issued on 16.09.2003 showing the

extent of land as 3,839 acres 12 guntas situated in the

following 16 villages:

1) Dasarahalli

2) Byrathikane

597

3) Challakere

4) Geddalahalli

5) K Narayanapura

6) Rachenahalli

7) Thanisandra

8) Amruthhalli

9) Jakkur

10) Kempapura

11) Sampigehalli

12) Srirampura

13) Venkateshpura

14) Hennur

15) Hebbala

16) Nagavara

3. Notices under Section 17(5) of the BDA Act was

issued and there was no objection received in respect of 91

acres 7 guntas. Objections received in respect of 2658 acres

were rejected. BDA resolved to delete 1089 acres 12 guntas of

land and to obtain sanction for 2750 acres. Accordingly, a

scheme formulated came to be sanctioned by the Government

of Karnataka (for short ‘State’) under Section 18(3) of the BDA

598

Act for 2750 acres of land. Final Notification dated 23.02.2004

came to be issued for acquisition of 2750 acres of land

situated in the aforesaid 16 villages. Awards came to be

passed to an extent of 1618.38 acres. BDA claims to have

taken possession in respect of 1459.37 acres of private land

and 459.16 acres of Government land and in all, 1919.13

acres of land. BDA claims to have formed the Layout by

carving 14103 plots/sites apart from developing the roads,

drains, civic amenity sites, etc.

4. The acquisition proceedings came to be questioned

before this court by filing writ petitions on several grounds

in W.P.Nos.51119-51132/2004 and connected matters. The

learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions by declaring

that BDA has no jurisdiction to frame developmental schemes

in Bangalore Metropolitan Area amongst granting other reliefs.

This order was challenged in Writ Appeal No.2625/2005 and

connected matters. Since some of the writ petitions had also

been filed challenging acquisition of lands for the formation of

“Arkavati Layout” on the grounds, which had been upheld by

the learned Single Judge, they were also taken up for

consideration by Division Bench since identical questions of

599

law and fact arose for consideration along with writ appeals.

The Division Bench in the matter of THE COMMISSIONER

BDA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS

SECRETARY reported in ILR 2006 KAR 318 (hereinafter

referred to as "Division Bench") by order dated 25.11.2005

allowed the writ appeals filed by the BDA and State, and set

aside the order dated 15.04.2005 passed by the learned Single

Judge and dismissed the challenge laid to acquisition of lands

for formation of Arkavati Layout. The acquisition of lands

came to be upheld by Division Bench subject to the conditions

stipulated thereunder.

5. In fact, Division Bench was also persuaded by the

Memo filed by BDA, which was also taken note of by the

Division Bench while issuing directions.

6. The order passed by the Division Bench of this

Court came to be challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court

and after considering the rival contentions, Hon’ble Apex Court

in the matter of BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHERS vs

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

reported in (2010) 7 SCC 129 (hereinafter referred to as

600

“BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case”) upheld the decision of the

Division Bench, subject to BDA’s actions to take certain

corrective measures by requiring it to reexamine certain

aspects and provide an option to the land losers to secure

some additional benefit as an incentive to accept the

acquisition. In other words, directions issued by the Division

Bench noted supra was affirmed subject to further directions

and clarifications issued thereunder. The Hon’ble Apex Court

had also observed that all allotments made by BDA either by

forming Layouts or by way of bulk allotments, would be

subject to the modified directions issued, extracted herein

above.

7. Pursuant to said clarification and directions issued

by Hon’ble Apex Court, BDA is said to have undertaken the

exercise and in the process, has recommended certain lands to

be excluded from entire acquisition by submitting re-modified

scheme for approval by the appropriate Government and in

terms of the order dated 03.04.2014 (Annexure-C in

W.P.No.59219/2014) has approved the same.

601

8. By virtue of aforesaid order passed by the Hon’ble

Apex Court and keeping in view the additional directions

issued, the State issued a Notification dated 18.03.2011

declaring that land owners are entitled for allotment of

developed plots in the ratio of 60:40 in 55% of the land

acquired after deducting the land to be utilized for civic

amenity purposes.

9. The BDA pursuant to directions issued has

conducted an enquiry through Land Acquisition Officers by

examining the applications and representations submitted by

various applicants and placed the said report before the Board

of BDA. Subsequently, BDA has approved the report and

restricted the total area to 176.07 acres of land for acquisition

by deleting 983.33 guntas vide resolution No.79/2013 dated

12.02.2013. The deleted lands measuring 983.33 guntas

included 198 acres 20 guntas of denotified lands and 83 acre 8

guntas of land in respect of which acquisition proceedings had

been already quashed in different cases. On the report

submitted by the BDA forwarded to the Government, the State

issued a modified scheme and thereafter the Notification dated

18.06.2014 came to be issued, under which an extent of 1766

602

acres 7 guntas of land was sought to be acquired. It is this

Notification which has been challenged in these writ petitions

apart from challenging the earlier Notification also by some of

the petitioners.

CONTENTIONS OF PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS:

10. Sum and substance of the grievance of the

petitioners in these writ petitions revolves around the following

contentions:

10.1 Some of the writ petitions have been filed by the

bonafide allottees of the sites formed by BDA in Arkavati

Layout, pursuant to which possession certificates have been

issued and Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of the

respective sites allotted to them have also been executed. They

have also sought for direction to the BDA to issue either

possession certificate or execute Lease cum Sale Agreement or

absolute sale deed and for issuance of khata.

10.2 In few of the writ petitions like W.P.No.42063/2012

and other matters, the Notification issued under sub-section(1)

of Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘LA

Act’), which came to be issued by the State withdrawing the

603

lands specified thereunder from acquisition has been called in

question contending interalia that pursuant to Preliminary and

Final Notification issued, BDA has formed the layout and sites

have been allotted to them and Lease cum Sale Deed have also

been executed in their favour and they are in possession and

enjoyment of the sites and as such Government could not have

denotified certain lands by withdrawing from acquisition.

10.3. Pursuant to the directions issued by the Division

Bench and further modified directions issued by the Hon’ble

Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, representations

have been submitted by several owners of the land contending

interalia that their claim would fall within the four corners of

the said directions. The said representations having been

considered by the BDA and having rejected, land owners have

filed writ petitions.

10.4 Whereas, few writ petitions like W.P.No.638/2014

have been filed challenging the acquisition proceedings

culminating in issuance of the Final Notification dated

18.06.2014 contending interalia that acquisition is deemed to

have lapsed under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation

604

and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short ‘ New LA Act’) on account of

possession having not been taken.

10.5 Yet, few writ petitions have been filed by land

owners for deletion of their respective lands on the ground of

further directions issued in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case

would enure to their benefit. In other words, they have sought

to raise a plea that on account of lands adjacent to the lands

owned by them having been deleted, the land owned by them

has become landlocked.

SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTIONS RAISED:

11. It is contended that representations submitted by

the land owners had been considered under Section 17(5) of

the BDA Act and a Notification under Section 19 of the said

Act came to be issued, which is bad in law since acquisition

proceedings have already been upheld by this court and the

Hon’ble Apex Court and BDA has been directed only to

consider the representation and as such, there was no need or

necessity for issuance of Notification dated 18.06.2014 once

again under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act. It is also contended

605

that Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case has

directed the BDA to consider the representations of the land

owners as to discrimination meted out to similarly placed land

owners and instead of complying with the said direction, BDA

has recommended the Government to denotify several lands

which is contrary to the dicta laid down by Hon’ble Apex

Court. It is also contended that Second Final Notification (for

short ‘SFN’) dated 18.06.2014 is without authority of law , as

BDA Act does not provide for the same and it has been issued

under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which has been

repealed. It is also contended that SFN has been issued

without application of mind. Elaborating on this, it is

contended that under SFN, 1766.05 guntas of land have been

sought to be acquired and approximately, 500 acres of

Government land has been wrongly notified which includes ‘B’

kharab lands. It is contended that Government has not

passed any order under Section 97 of the Karnataka Land

Revenue Act to divert ‘B’ kharab land for formation of a

Layout. Moreover, 20,000 sites are sought to be formed in an

area of 2750 acres initially and on account of reduction in the

extent namely, confining the acquisition to 1766.05 acres, it

would indicate that scheme cannot be implemented, as most of

606

the said lands are tank bed, gomala etc. wherein Layout

cannot be formed. It is also contended that Section 503-C of

Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 by which

Planning Authority is constituted, the Bangalore Metropolitan

Planning Authority ( for short BMPA) is required to draw a

scheme for Bangalore Metropolitan Area and State cannot

exercise the power of BMPA by issuing the impugned

Notification.

11.1 Yet other forceful argument which has been

canvassed relates to the lands which are sought to be acquired

is landlocked and/or similarly placed as that of lands which

have been denotified. As such, there is hostile discrimination.

11.2 It is further contended that Hon’ble Apex Court in

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case has clearly held that Layout

cannot be formed by BDA in bits and pieces or in scattered

Layouts, inasmuch as, continuous Layout cannot be formed

and as such, Notification is liable to be set aside. It is further

submitted that SFN is hit by the provisions of New LA Act and

on account of award having not been passed pursuant to the

SFN and possession of lands having not been taken,

607

acquisition proceedings are deemed to have been lapsed. It is

also contended that neither award amount is paid nor

deposited and as such, acquisition proceedings have lapsed.

11.3 It is further contended that erstwhile land owners

have formed revenue Layout prior to Preliminary Notification

and therefore they ought to have been served with a notice of

acquisition and in the absence thereof, it has to be necessarily

held as acquisition having been lapsed. Drawing the attention

of court to the photographs produced along with writ petitions,

it is contended that there are residential buildings constructed

by petitioners in the lands in question and they are in

existence since long and as such, acquisition of such lands

cannot be proceeded with. They have further contended that

Land Acquisition Officers (for short LAO) have themselves

recommended for exclusion of lands in their reports, which

has not been considered and same have been included in SFN.

11.4 Learned advocates appearing for petitioners have

contended that BDA has issued different and inconsistent

endorsements after considering the representations of the

petitioners. They would contend that sketch issued by one

608

LAO would depict the area as deleted, which has been changed

by another LAO depicting that same has been acquired. On

account of scheme having not been implemented under

Section 27, it is deemed to have lapsed since within five (5)

years from the date of first Final Notification dated 23.02.2004,

the scheme has not been implemented.

11.5 For the purposes of convenience, contentions

raised in some of the writ petitions including the common

contentions referred to herein above are enumerated below:

W.P.No.51929/2014 & Connected Matters:

12. Preliminary Notification under section 17(3) of BDA

Act for acquisition of 3339 acres of land in the 16 villages

aforestated for formation of Arkavati Layout came to be issued

on 03.02.2003 and subsequently, on 16.09.2003 modified

Preliminary Notification was issued proposing thereunder to

acquire 3839 acres 12 guntas in the said 16 villages. After

issuance of notice under Section 17(5) of BDA Act and on

receipt of objections, BDA resolved to delete 1089 acres 12

guntas land and sought for sanction/approval of the scheme

for 2750 acres of land and submitted the proposal to the

609

appropriate Government which in turn, sanctioned the scheme

under Section 18(3) of the BDA Act. It is thereafter Final

Notification dated 23.02.2004 came to be issued for acquiring

2750 acres of land situated in the aforestated 16 villages.

After conducting an enquiry, award is said to have been

passed to an extent of 1618.38 acres and possession claims to

have been taken in respect of 1459.37 acres of private land

and 459.16 acres of Government land, thus in all, 1919.13

acres of land has been acquired for formation of the Layout. It

is also stated that BDA has formed a Layout by laying or

forming 14103 plots apart from constructing roads, culverts,

drains, etc. however, said Notifications both Preliminary and

Final were under challenge before this court in various writ

petitions and said writ petitions came to be allowed by order

dated 15.04.2005 (in W.P.Nos.26601-04/2004 and connected

matters (reported in ILR 2005 KAR 3710)) and acquisition

proceedings initiated by BDA came to be quashed. As already

noticed herein above, Division Bench in W.A.Nos.2624-

25/2005 by order dated 25.11.2005 allowed the writ appeals,

set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge

upholding the scheme subject to conditions/directions issued

thereunder. Directions/ order of Division Bench of this Court

610

came to be affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case referred to supra. Hon’ble Apex Court in

the directions/clarification issued has made it explicitly clear

that any allotment made by BDA either by forming a Layout or

by way of bulk allotments would be subject to such directions

and clarification issued.

12.1 Subsequent to order/directions issued by Hon’ble

Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, State Government

has issued a Notification dated 18.03.2011 declaring that land

owners are entitled to plots in the ratio of 40:60 namely, 40%

to land owners and 60% to BDA after deducting the land

utilised for civic amenities, parks, roads, drainages, culverts,

etc. In the light of directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court, it

was to the effect that acquisition of lands in Kempapura and

Srirampura is concerned, BDA should reconsider objections to

the acquisition having regard to the fact that large areas were

not initially notified for acquisition and more than 50% of

whatever that was notified for acquisition, was also

subsequently deleted from acquisition. BDA has to consider

whether in view of deletion to a large extent, development with

respect to balance of the acquired lands has become illogical

611

and impractical and if so, whether balance area also should be

deleted from acquisition. It was further directed that if BDA

still proposes to continue the acquisition, it shall file a report

within four (4) months before the High Court so that

consequential orders can be passed. Insofar as villages of

Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where

there are small pockets of acquired lands surrounded by

lands, which were not acquired or which were deleted from the

proposed acquisition, BDA may consider whether such small

pockets should also be deleted if they are not suitable for

forming self contained Layouts since acquisition thereof

cannot be justified on the ground that these small islands of

acquired land, could be used as a stand-alone park or

playground in regard to a Layout formed in different

unconnected lands in other villages. Similar isolated pockets

in other villages should also be dealt with in a similar manner.

As such, observing/clarifying these aspects, directions came to

be issued by Hon’ble Apex Court that BDA should give option

to each of the writ petitioners whose lands have been acquired

for the Arkavati Layout to accept allotment for 15% of the land

acquired from him by way of developed plots in lieu of

compensation, any fractions in excess of 15% may be charged

612

at prevailing rates of allotment or where extent of land

acquired exceeds half an acre, to claim in addition to

compensation (without prejudice to seek reference, if he is not

satisfied with the quantum), allotment of a plot measuring 30’

x 40’ for every half acre of land acquired at the prevailing

allotment price and accordingly, directed BDA to undertake

such exercise. It is in this background, BDA is said to have

conducted an enquiry through Land Acquisition Officers by

receiving various applications/representations filed by the

applicants and after conducting such enquiry, has placed

report before the Board of BDA, who in turn has approved the

report and scaled down or reduced the extent of acquisition of

the lands for formation of Arkavati Layout to 1760 acres of

land by deleting yet another 983 acres 33 guntas of land. The

appropriate Government after having perused the said

proposal, is said to have approved and re-modified the scheme

and accordingly, impugned Notification has been issued for

formation for Arkavati Layout.

W.P.30731/2014:

13. It is the contention of Mr. Bharath Kumar V.,

learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that order passed

613

by this court on 17.10.2017 calling upon BDA to produce the

original records to establish the fact that land in question has

been acquired, Layout has been formed and sites have been

allotted to the applicants and BDA has failed to produce the

records. Hence, he prays that an adverse inference may be

drawn in favour of petitioner and against the BDA.

13.1 He would also submit that the land which is the

subject matter of present writ petition would fall within the

parameters prescribed by the Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case namely, on all the three sites, lands

which were also proposed to be acquired has been de-notified

on account of said land being fully developed, as such land

belonging to the petitioner is a land locked. Hence, he prays

for acquisition insofar as the petitioner’s land is concerned to

be quashed.

13.2 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned counsel

appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 would defend the

acquisition proceedings.

614

W.P.No.36525/2016:

14. Petitioners claim to be the owners of land bearing

Sy.No.1/1 measuring 25 guntas situated at Ammanibyrathi

Kane Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.

14.1 Petitioners claim title to the property under

registered sale deed dated 20.05.1946 and subsequent

partition on 15.10.1982. It is the contention of Sri T Seshagiri

Rao, learned Advocate appearing for petitioners that entire

area is built up and hence, they would fall within the

parameters fixed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case. It is also contended that it is a patta

land. Revenue records would also indicate that same has not

been mutated to the names of petitioners and it continues to

reflect the name of Government as owner of the land. On

these grounds, they have sought for deletion of their land from

acquisition. They would also rely upon the photographs

produced to contend that entire surrounding area is built up.

W.P. No. 35204/2014:

15. Petitioners are claiming to be the owners of sites

formed out of Survey No.97/2 of Jakkur Village having

615

purchased the same in the year 1999 and contending that on

08.05.1999 itself the land was converted for non-

agricultural/residential purposes. It is submitted by the

learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that after

purchasing the sites petitioners have put up structures

namely, residential building as evident from the photographs

produced at Annexures – B1 and B6 and C1 and C9 and katha

is also mutated in the respective names of petitioners and

taxes are being collected and when this was the factual

position, out of blue Preliminary and Final Notification came to

be issued proposing to acquire the said lands and petitioner

has submitted that on account of property having been build

up, dicta laid down by the Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case would be squarely applicable. As such he

prays for allowing the writ petition.

W.P.No.37446/2014:

16. It is contended that scheduled sites are formed out

of composite land bearing original Sy.Nos.103/1, 103/2,

103/3, 103/4, 103/5 at Rachenahalli Village in which Sy.No.3

was converted way back on 17.07.1992 and petitioners have

put up construction and lands in question are landlocked

616

lands and as such, it would fall within four corners of

directions/clarification issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at paragraph 160(ii) and as such

continuation of acquisition of sites in question would be

contrary to the directions issued by the Apex Court. Hence, he

seeks for allowing the petition and quashing of proceedings.

16.1 Per contra, Sri. Bipin Hegde, learned counsel

appearing for respondents would support the acquisition

proceedings and prays for dismissal of the petition. He would

also reiterate the grounds urged in the statement of objections

and would contend that award has been passed and

possession of land has been taken over by BDA and handed

over to Engineering Section and BDA has formed a Layout and

there has been substantial implementation of the scheme.

Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

16.2 Though, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner

has contended that lands in question are the lands which have

already been deleted and relies upon the Layout plan

(Annexure-D). For the present, it cannot be relied upon and it

is neither counter signed by any statutory authorities nor they

617

would indicate as to survey numbers in which sites have been

formed or carved out. As to whether the sites in question

would form part of Sy.No.103/4 of Rachenahalli village is

disputed question of fact which cannot be called into in writ

jurisdiction.

16.3 Elaborating his submission, learned Advocate

appearing for petitioner would contend that on all the three

sides of Sy.No.103/4, lands which were proposed for

acquisition have been deleted and as such, land in

Sy.No.103/4 is to be construed as an island as indicated in

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and as such, petitioner is

entitled for deletion of said land from acquisition.

16.4 Per contra, learned Advocate appearing for

respondent-BDA would contend that possession of

Sy.No.103/4 has been taken and sites have been formed and

24 sites have been formed out of which six (6) sites have

already been allotted by relying upon document produced

along with I.A.No.1/2019.

618

W.P.No.38463/2014:

17. Petitioners claim to be the owners of Site No.9

carved out of Sy.No.141/1 of Challakere Village, K.R.Puram

Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, having purchased the same

under registered sale deed dated 27.02.2013 from

Sri.M.C.Narayanaswamy, who had purchased from Sri.C.Santa

Maria under a registered sale deed dated 17.03.2004 –

Annexures-A and B respectively. It is the grievance of

petitioners that said property had been purchased by them for

putting up residential building and accordingly, they have

constructed residential building which has since been

demolished by BDA. It is the grievance of petitioners that their

claim has not been considered in terms of law laid down by

Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

case. Hence, petitioners have sought for quashing of Final

Notification dated 23.02.2004 – Annexure-F and Notification

dated 18.06.2014 – Annexure-G on the ground that said

Notifications are illegal.

17.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate

appearing for respondent Nos. - 2 and 3 would support the

acquisition proceedings and contends that petitioner is not

619

entitled for any of the relief sought for, inasmuch as, they were

not notified khatedars; no application was filed for registering

their names as directed by Division Bench of this Court and

construction of the house has come up subsequent to

Preliminary Notification. On these grounds, respondent Nos.-2

and 3 have sought for dismissal of the petition.

17.2 It is an undisputed fact that petitioner had

purchased the property in question on 27.02.2013 i.e.,

subsequent to Preliminary and Final Notification issued by the

BDA. Petitioners have not submitted any representation to

BDA. Even in the absence of their claim of BDA having not

considered their plea, in the background of Division Bench

judgment and BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case will have to be

considered.

W.P.No.39832/2014:

18. Petitioner claims to be the owner of lands bearing

Sy.Nos.129/2, 133/1, 133/2 & 133/3 measuring 25 guntas,

32 guntas, 6 guntas and 5 guntas respectively situated at

Challakere village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.

He has questioned acquisition Notification relating to Arkavati

620

Layout. Undisputedly, challenge to said Notification has

reached Finality before Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Pursuant to same, petitioner is

said to have submitted representation and endorsement dated

07.01.2011 came to be issued by BDA, which was questioned

by petitioners in W.P.Nos.7049-7052/2011. Claim of the

petitioner have not been considered in the light of directions

and observations made by Hon’ble Apex Court in paragraph

160 of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case referred to supra, Co-

ordinate Bench quashed the same by order dated 01.02.2012

passed in said writ petitions and directed respondent–BDA to

re-consider the representation/application submitted by

petitioner for deletion of his land from acquisition.

18.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that said

representation having been submitted on 27.06.2014, without

considering the same, subsequent Notification has been

issued. Hence, petitioner is seeking for quashing of

Notification.

621

18.2 Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner has

reiterated the contentions raised and grounds urged in the writ

petitions.

18.3 Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate appearing for

respondent-BDA would draw the attention of the Court to

Annexures-R1 to R8 produced along with statement of

objections to contend that except sporadic constructions

having been put-up in the lands acquired, major portion of the

land has been lying vacant as per the mahazar drawn and

possession of said land has been taken way back in the year

2004 itself. It is also contended that sites have already been

formed in the said lands and as such, he prays for dismissal of

the petitions.

W.P.No.43815/2014:

19. Petitioner claims to be the owner of property

bearing Site No.206. The said site has been carved out of

Sy.Nos.45/1, 45/6, 48/1, 48/2, 54 and 47 of Dasarahalli

village measuring East to West 81.6 feet and North to South 48

feet. He is seeking for quashing of the Notification dated

18.06.2014 insofar as his property is concerned.

622

19.1 It is the contention of Sri. Narayana Rao H.R,

learned Advocate appearing for petitioner that said site has

been formed by the vendor of petitioner after obtaining

conversion order of said land and pursuant to purchase, she

has put up construction over the property and residing therein

after obtaining electricity and water connection from the

statutory authorities and as such khata is also made out and

revenue records have been mutated in the name of petitioner

in the records of BBMP and as such, at this length of time, if

the property is acquired, she would be put to hardship as it is

the only property which is available to her. He would also

elaborate his submission by contending that entire property,

which petitioner had purchased, has been safeguarded by

putting up compound wall and it is in her possession and

enjoyment and as such, he seeks for quashing of the

impugned Notification. He would also contend that the

adjacent properties are fully developed and there is no land left

for BDA to make any development pursuant to this scheme.

19.2 Per contra, learned counsel appearing for BDA has

supported the acquisition insofar as Sy.Nos.45/1, 45/6, 48/1,

623

48/2, 54 and 47 of Dasarahalli village. It is also contended

that petitioner is a subsequent purchaser and as such she has

no locus standi to file a petition. He would reiterate the

grounds urged in the statement of objections by contending

that all schemes have been implemented insofar as

Dasarahalli village is concerned and as such question of

granting any relief to the petitioner does not arise as

petitioner’s case would not fall within the parameter laid down

by the Division Bench and as affirmed and modified by the

Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he

prays for rejection of the petition.

19.3 Having heard the learned counsel appearing for

petitioner and respondents, it would emerge from the very

Notification that undisputedly, petitioner has purchased the

property in the year 2004 i.e., under sale deed dated

17.9.2004 and Preliminary Notification came to be issued on

03.02.2003 followed by Final Notification dated 23.02.2004.

Thus, petitioner having purchased the property on 17.09.2004,

which is subsequent to Notification dated 23.02.2004 and

before Notification dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure-A), the only

issue which would required to be considered is as to what

624

relief the petitioner would be entitled to in the background of

parameters fixed by the Division Bench of this Court as

affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

case whereunder clarification and further directions came to

be issued.

W.P.Nos.44306/2014:

20. In these writ petitions, petitioners who are claiming

to be the purchasers of sites from Talakaveri Housing

Cooperative Building Society are contending interalia that they

have purchased the sites under registered sale deeds and said

sale deeds have come into existence prior to impugned

Notifications.

20.1 Sri.B.M.Halaswamy, learned counsel appearing for

petitioners would also elaborate his submission by contending

that land measuring 8 acres was converted and a

memorandum of understanding was entered into between the

then land owner - Sri. K. Gundu Rao along with Talakaveri

Housing Cooperative Building Society, pursuant to which

conversion of land was obtained and sites came to be formed

by the Society and sale deeds were executed on behalf of

625

Sri.Gundu Rao by Talakaveri Housing Cooperative Building

Society.

20.2 He would submit that BDA had recognized sale

deeds executed in favour of allottees till death of Sri.Gundu

Rao and subsequent to his death, sale deeds executed have

been not recognized. He would also submit that suit filed by

the deceased Gundu Rao has also been withdrawn and as

such acquisition of lands, insofar, as petitioners are concerned

be dropped in the background of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case

keeping in mind the adjacent land has also been dropped from

the acquisition.

20.3 Per contra, Sri.M.N.Ramanjaneya, learned Standing

Counsel appearing for BDA would submit that petitioners are

only agreement holders and does not have any right over the

property and as such petitioners would not be entitled for the

relief sought for. He would also submit that BDA has formed

Layout in the said 8 acres of land and allotted sites in favour of

applicants and possession also having been delivered, they are

waiting for Lease cum Sale Deeds having been executed in

626

favour of allottees. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ

petition.

W.P.No.46766/2014:

24. Petitioner is the owner of land bearing Survey

No.14/1 situated at Thanisandra Village measuring 1 acre 20

guntas. He is seeking for a writ of mandamus to delete the said

land from acquisition proceedings as it has been included in

Final Notification dated 23.02.2004 Annexure-B.

24.1 It is the contention of Sri.Vikhar Ahmed B., learned

counsel appearing for petitioner that claim of petitioner would

fall within the four corners of paragraph-160(2) of BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case, inasmuch as, lands adjacent and

abutting to petitioner’s land has been denotified by the BDA

namely, Survey No.12/7 on eastern side and remaining

portion of Survey Nos.14/1 and 66/6. Hence, he seeks for land

belonging to petitioner also being set aside.

24.2 Per contra, Sri K.Krishna, learned counsel

appearing for respondent-BDA seeks for dismissal of writ

petition on the ground that lands abutting to petitioner’s land

namely, Survey Nos.13 and 14/2 on northern and southern

sides respectively are acquired, possession taken, sites carved

out and as such, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

627

24.3 Having heard learned Advocates counsel appearing

for parties and on perusal of records, it requires to be noticed

that in the instant case, undisputedly petitioner was also a

party to earlier round of proceedings. Division Bench while

disposing of writ appeal on 25.11.2005 granting succor to land

owners at paragraph-106(D)(i), gave liberty to applicants to

submit appropriate applications to the authorities seeking

such exclusion and exemption from acquisition by producing

documents to substantiate their contentions within one month

from the date of that order and indicating thereunder that they

would be at liberty to demonstrate that their lands are situated

within green belt area or they are totally built up or properties

where there are buildings constructed by Charitable,

Educational and Religious Institutions or nursery lands or who

have set up factories or their lands are similar to the lands,

which are adjoining the lands but not notified for acquisition

at all. Undisputedly, petitioner did not submit any application

or representation to the BDA. However, now petitioner is

attempting to take umbrage on account of matter pending

before the Hon’ble Apex Court, even though no application was

filed before BDA as ordered by Division Bench. Even

otherwise, the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

628

case which came to be disposed of on 05.05.2010, as already

noticed hereinabove, apart from confirming/affirming the

judgment of learned Single Judge and affirming acquisition

proceedings had also further clarified that BDA can consider

whether small pockets of acquired lands and surrounded

lands, which are not acquired for the purposes of deletion are

not suitable for forming self contained Layout. Hence, said

benefit was extended to those persons namely, owners of lands

to pursue their grievances before the BDA by submitting

representations and BDA was directed to consider such

representations in accordance with direction issued by the

Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Pursuant

to same, BDA has undertaken exercise of redoing the whole

issue namely, examining claim of land owners. At that point of

time also, there was no representation submitted by petitioner

or representation, if any, filed earlier was pending. Hence, no

fault can be found on the BDA in this regard. However, it is

seen in many instances, that BDA in compliance of direction

issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

case, suo motu has undertaken exercise to delete certain lands

on the premise that it would fall within the parameters fixed

either by the Division Bench or by the Hon’ble Apex Court

629

clarified in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and accordingly, in

many instances, it has dropped lands from acquisition or in

other words, lands which were proposed to be acquired under

Notification dated 23.02.2004 came to be deleted. It is

thereafter Notification dated 18.06.2014 came to be issued.

Even immediately thereafter or within a reasonable period,

petitioner did not make any representation. In other words,

petitioner can be termed as a fence-sitter or who had slept over

his right, if any and without seeking for deletion of land

included in Notification dated 18.06.2014, still petitioner is

clinging to Notification dated 23.02.2004, which has got

eclipsed by virtue of Notification dated 18.06.2014.

W.P.No.47107/2014:

25. Petitioner claims to be the Khatedar of the land

bearing Survey No.61/3 of Amruthahalli Village, Yelahanka

Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, measuring 10 guntas. It is

contended that said land is bounded on the east by

Sy.No.61/4, west by Sy.No.61/3, north by Sy.No.38 and south

by Sy.No.62. It is contended in the SFN dated 18.06.2014 first

respondent has excluded Sy.No.61/4 and 62/1, which were

vacant agricultural lands as on the date Preliminary

Notification dated 23.02.2004 (Annexure-A) was issued and

630

though petitioner's land had been developed even prior to

Preliminary Notification and were entitled to be treated on par

with the lands excluded from acquisition namely, Sy.No.61/4

and 62/1, same benefit has not been extended to the

petitioners. Thus, contending that there is discrimination

between two (2) similarly placed persons and Division Bench

judgment as well as dicta laid in BONDU RAMASWAMY's have

not been correctly applied to the claim of petitioner, he has

sought for quashing of Final Notification dated 18.06.2014

(Annexure-C). Contending that there is clause discrimination

between 2 person who are equally placed, challenge to the

impugned notification is laid. It is also contended that lands

belonging to the Government, which had been reserved for

public purposes have not been declassified as required under

Section 97 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act namely, there

is no order passed for diversion of the said lands. It is also

contended that non alienable 'B' kharab lands are also wrongly

notified for acquisition and hence, acquisition has to be set

aside. These amongst other grounds, urged in the connected

writ petitions and reiterating the same petitioner has sought

for writ petition being allowed.

631

25.1 Per contra, Sri.G.Lakshmeesha Rao, learned

counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has reiterated

the averments made in the statement of objections and

adopting the arguments addressed by Sri.Nanjunda Reddy,

learned Senior Counsel who has appeared on behalf of BDA,

he prays for dismissal of the petition.

W.P.Nos.47608/2014

26. Petitioners claims to be the purchasers of sites 157,

157A - Annexures –A and A1 respectively carved out of

Sy.No.45/6 of Dasarahalli Village. It is contended that in the

light of direction issued by the Division Bench that BDA is

required to examine the claim of petitioners.

26.1 Though Sri. K. Krishna, learned counsel appearing

for BDA is justified in contending that petitioners have not got

registered themselves for considering their request, fact

remains that under similar circumstances even where the

applicants were the revenue sites holders had approached this

Court in the earlier round of litigation or having not submitted

the representations, have been directed by this Court to

consider the claim of applicants in the teeth of directions

issued by the Division Bench and as such, it requires to be

examined as to whether petitioners would also be entitled to

632

similar reliefs or any other relief though claim of petitioners for

deletion of lands insofar as sites purchased by them concerned

would not hold water.

W.P.No.47731/2014:

27. It is the contention of the petitioner that he is the

owner of the land measuring 1 acre 37 guntas in Survey

No.72/2 of Thanisandra Village having acquired the same by

way of succession.

27.1 Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that

petitioner has constructed a house as reflected in Annexure-H

and they are residing therein. Neither the Preliminary

Notification nor Final Notification or the modified Notification

reflected the correct name of petitioner and as such, petitioner

had no notice of the acquisition proceedings till 2014. He

would submit that the adjacent properties which were allotted

to the shares of his brothers have been left out from the

acquisition, as they are built up area and all the three sites of

the petitioner’s property the buildings have coming up, as

such the judgment of Apex Court rendered in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case would be squarely applicable to

petitioner’s claim and hence he prays for land bearing Survey

633

No.72/2 measuring 1 acre 37 guntas be dropped from the

acquisition proceedings.

27.2 Per contra, Sri M.B. Prabhakar, learned counsel

appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 would support the

Notification and he would adopt the arguments addressed by

Sri B.N. Nanjundareddy, learned Senior Counsel who had

appeared on behalf of the BDA.

W.P.No.48880/2014:

28. Heard Sri.Somashekhar, learned Advocate

appearing for petitioner. Respondents are served and

unrepresented. No statement of objections has been filed.

28.1 Petitioner who claims to be the owner of 0.5¼

guntas of land in Sy.No.85/3 situated at Amruthahalli,

Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk is seeking for deletion

of said extent of land from Final Notification contending

interalia that on three sides of land in question namely,

Sy.Nos.86, 84 and 115 situated on the northern, eastern and

southern sides have been deleted and as such, there is no

reason for the BDA to continue with the acquisition of land

insofar as land owned by the petitioners. Hence, contending

that further directions and clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex

Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at paragraph 160 would

634

squarely be applicable to the case of petitioners, he prays for

deletion of land from acquisition.

28.2 The working plan insofar as Amruthahalli village

furnished by learned Advocate appearing for BDA in the

connected matters would disclose that to the north of

Sy.No.85/3, land bearing Sy.No.84 has been deleted, on the

eastern side, Sy.No.86 (portion) has been deleted and even on

the southern side, there is ‘nala’, above which, there is vacant

space, which is also not included in the acquisition

proceedings. Therefore, on all the three sides of Sy.No.85/3

namely, north, east and south lands as referred to herein

above has not been acquired by BDA.

28.3 In the impugned order (Annexure-F), consideration

seems to have been made by BDA pursuant to the direction

issued by the Division Bench of this Court and not in the light

of clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case. In fact, there is no reference to the

judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the impugned

endorsement. There is no statement of objections filed by BDA

indicating that said exercise was undertaken by BDA to

examine claim of the petitioner.

635

W.P. No.51294/2014:

29. Respondent No.9 is claiming right over the site

No.198, which is said to have been purchased by him from the

erstwhile owner Smt.Saroja under registered Sale Deed dated

20.12.2014 formed out of Survey No.82/2/14 of Thanisandra

Village, contending inter alia that said Saroja was the owner of

land bearing Survey No.35/2 of Thanisandra Village,

measuring 1 acre 1 ½ guntas and in view of she giving up her

right to the said land, which was acquired by the BDA for

formation of Arkavati Layout under the extract scheme

operating, she has been allotted the site wherein site bearing

No. Survey No.198, which has since been sold by her to the 9th

respondent, as such acquisition of land bearing Survey

No.82/2/14 by the BDA is justified and hence, he has prayed

for dismissal of the petition.

W.P.No.52760/2014:

30. Petitioners who own property bearing Sy.No.13/3A

measuring 22 guntas situated at Jakkur village, Yelahanka

Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk are before this Court with a

prayer to delete said land from acquisition.

636

30.1 It is the contention of petitioners that said land is

surrounded by Sy.Nos.13/2, 13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B, which

have not been notified and as such, petitioners claim would

fall within the parameters of clarification/direction issued by

Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case vide

paragraph 160(ii).

30.2 Per contra, Sri.K.Krishna, learned Advocate

appearing on behalf of Sri.M.B.Prabhakar for respondent-BDA

would support the action of respondent in acquiring the land

in question and by reiterating the grounds urged in the

statement of objections, he would contend that possession of

land has been taken, sites have been formed and as such,

considering the claim of petitioners for deletion of land in

question would be inappropriate, he prays for dismissal of the

petition.

W.P.No.54358/2014:

31. Petitioners claim to be the owners of 18 guntas of

land situated in Sy.No.81/3B of Rachenahalli village,

K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk. They have sought for

quashing of acquisition proceedings under impugned

Notification dated 18.06.2014.

637

31.1 It is the contention of Sri.N.Sonnegowda, learned

Advocate appearing for petitioners that though petitioners’

names were mutated in the revenue records, none of the

impugned Notifications reflected their names. He would also

submit that land in question measures about 18 guntas and is

an isolated pocket surrounded by land bearing Sy.Nos.81/2A,

81/2B, 82 , 83/1, 81/3A, 84/2 and portion of 81/3B, which

lands have been excluded and respondent – BDA by pick and

choose method has sought to acquire land in question

belonging to the petitioners and as such, he has sought for

said land being dropped from the acquisition proceedings. He

would also draw the attention of Court to paragraph 160(ii) of

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case to contend that claim of

petitioner would fall within four corners of the said

directions/clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex Court.

31.2 It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing

for respondent-BDA that 28 sites have been formed in said

land and 8 sites have been allotted.

31.3 Perusal of the working plan and plan approved by

the Commissioner-BDA, insofar, as it relates to Rachenahalli

village, it would disclose that land measuring 18 guntas in

638

Sy.No.81/3B, which is sought to be acquired, is bounded on

east by Sy.Nos.81/2A & 81/2B, west by halla and Sy.No.82 &

83/1, north by Sy.No.81/3B (excluded major portion) and

84/2 and south by Sy.No.81/3A and all these three lands have

been notified for acquisition.

W.P.No.56748/2014:

32. Learned counsel appearing for BDA has furnished

details of the sites formed in the Arkavati Layout, which is

village vice and in respect of the same, it has depicted the

number of sites formed. However, details of sites are not

forthcoming. For instance in Thanisandra village bearing

Sy.Nos.1/1 to 14/1 the details of the sites formed is not

forthcoming. However, in respect of Sy.No.17/5 (subject

matter of W.P.No.56748-775/2014) BDA claims to have formed

sites bearing Sy.Nos.403 to 409, 410 to 413, 416 to 426, 385,

386, 387, 388 and 389. Names of the allottees in respect of

Sy.Nos.410, 413, 416 to 426 are reflected; as to whether these

sites are within the area, which has been constructed or not,

details are not forthcoming. On the other hand, petitioners

claim to have purchased sites and have also contended that

they have constructed residential buildings and are residing

therein and photographs produced at Annexures-D to F, H1

639

would disclose several buildings have come up. BDA by

endorsement dated 18.12.2015 -Annexure-W has also

intimated the Secretary, AAR Employees Society to remit

Rs.1,10,00,000/- towards development charges.

32.1 In that view of the matter, it has been ascertained

by actual examination as to whether the sites which are

sought to be deleted from the acquisition would fall within the

zone of sites already formed by BDA and allotted to third

parties and if there are such allottees, they will have to

necessarily allot alternate sites to such of the allottees.

W.P. No.58829/2014:

33. Sri.M.B.Prabhakar, learned counsel for respondent

Nos.2 and 3 would contend that predecessors in title of

petitioner were parties to the proceedings in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’S case, wherein, the challenge was laid to the

legality of acquisition proceedings of Arkavati Layout and same

having laid to rest, petitioners cannot have any independent

leg to stand and as such, he has prayed for dismissal of the

petition by reiterating the contentions raised in the statement

of objections.

640

W.P.No.18814/2015:

34. Petitioner claims to be the owner of property

bearing Sy.No.94/7 measuring 1 acre situated at Thanisandra,

K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore.

34.1 On account of representation submitted by

petitioner having not been considered, petitioner had

approached this court in W.P.No.23964/2014 and this court

by order dated 28.11.2014 (Annexure-E) directed the

respondent-BDA to consider the said representation.

Pursuant to the same, petitioner submitted one more

representation on 19.12.2014 –Annexure-F, which was

adjudicated by respondent-BDA and issued an endorsement

dated 20.04.2015 rejecting the request of petitioner.

34.2 Photographs produced along with the petition

would indicate that at an undisputed point of time, it was

virgin land. Mahazar produced along with statement of

objections filed by respondent Nos.-1 and 2 would indicate

that possession of the land has been taken on 30.06.2006 and

Notification under Section 16(2) of the Act has been issued.

That apart, sites have been formed and have been allotted to

third parties/allottees. It is submitted by respondent-BDA

641

that land bearing Sy.Nos.94/4B and 95/5 situated on the

northern side of Sy.No.94/7 was not included in the

Notification dated 23.02.2004.

W.P.No.29317/2015:

35. Petitioner claims to be the owner of 16 guntas of

land situated in Sy.No.4/1 of Sampigehalli village, Yelahanka

Hobli, she has sought for quashing of acquisition proceedings

commenced under impugned Notification dated 18.06.2014

and also endorsement dated 20.01.2015–Annexure-A

whereunder prayer of the petitioner for deleting land in

question from acquisition has been turned down by BDA.

35.1 It is the contention of Sri.Y.S.Vedhkumar, learned

Advocate appearing for petitioner that though petitioner’s

name was mutated in the revenue records, none of the

impugned Notifications reflected her name. He would also

submit that land in question measures about 16 guntas and is

an isolated pocket surrounded by land Sy.Nos.4/2, 5/2, 4/1

which lands have not been acquired and yet, respondent –

BDA by pick and choose method has sought to acquire land in

question belonging to the petitioner and as such, he has

sought for said land being dropped from the acquisition

642

proceedings. He would also draw the attention of court to

paragraph 160(ii) of BONDU RAMASWAMY reported in to

contend that claim of petitioner would fall within four corners

of the said directions/clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex

Court.

35.2 Perusal of working plan and plan approved by the

Commissioner, BDA, insofar as it relates to Sampigehalli

village, would disclose that land measuring 16 guntas in

Sy.No.4/1 which is sought to be acquired, is indicated as

reserved for civil amenity and said land is bounded on East by

Sy.No.4/2, South by Sy.No.5/2, West by Sy.No.4/1 and

thereafter by Sy.No.6/1 and all these three lands have not

been notified for acquisition.

W.P.No.29541/2015:

36. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus being

issued to BDA for executing sale deed pursuant to allotment

made.

36.1 Petitioners were applicants before respondent-BDA,

who had filed applications seeking allotment of sites formed in

Arkavati Layout. Pursuant to said application, petitioners

were allotted site No.71 in Block No.7 and Sy.No.829 in Block

643

No.11, Arkavati Layout measuring 50’ x 80’ and 30’ x 40’ vide

allotment letters dated 24.06.2006 and 30.12.2005 -

Annexures-A and B respectively. Pursuant to same, entire site

value is said to have been deposited by the petitioners. On

account of non-execution of sale deed or delivering possession,

petitioners have approached this court seeking a writ of

mandamus to direct respondent-BDA to register the sale deeds

in respect of sites allotted to them.

36.2 On respondents being notified, statement of

objections have been filed stating that under re-do exercise

carried out by BDA pursuant to decision of Hon’ble Apex Court

in BONDU RAMASWAMY, large number of sites are being held

up or lands have been deleted and as such about 3000 sites

have been reserved for being allotted to the allottees in another

Layout “Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout”. Hence,

respondent-BDA has stated that petitioners have been allotted

site Nos. B9-SC-2201 and B5-SF-2137 to petitioners as per the

allotment letters dated 09.11.2017 (Annexures-R2 and R3).

Hence, they contend that present prayer sought for in the writ

petitions has become infructuous.

644

37. Though stand of respondent-BDA appeals to logic,

fact remains that even in respect of sites which have been

allotted, there is no whisper with regard to Lease-cum-Sale

Agreement or absolute sale deed having not been executed in

favour of petitioners. As such, respondent - BDA is directed to

take immediate steps in this regard to execute Lease-cum-Sale

Agreement and petitioners shall approach BDA for redressal of

their grievance in that regard. In the event of such

application/representation is filed, BDA shall consider the

same and take steps expeditiously, at any rate, within an outer

limit of three months from the date of receipt of such

representations.

W.P.Nos.30781/2015:

38. Petitioner who is claiming to be the owner of land

bearing Sy.No.2/5 measuring 1 acre 27 guntas situated at

Thanisandra village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk is

seeking for deletion of said land from acquisition.

38.1 Working map/plan produced by the BDA would

disclose that on the north and south of land bearing

Sy.No.2/5, it is bounded by Sy.Nos.2/4 and 2/B, which have

not been notified for acquisition, on the eastern side there is a

645

road and thereafter land bearing Sy.No.11/1, which is also

notified for acquisition and on the western side, Sy.No.1/1 is

situated and same is also not notified for acquisition. Hence,

it is the contention of learned Advocate appearing for petitioner

that claim of the petitioner would fall within the parameters of

paragraph 160(ii) of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and

petitioner is entitled for deletion/dropping of his land from

acquisition.

W.P.No.35055/2015:


issued to BDA for executing sale deed pursuant to allotment

made.

W.P.No.47820/2015:

40. In this writ petition the dispute relates to the

property bearing Sy.No.65/5 measuring 2 acres 2 guntas out

of which 1 acre has sought to be acquired located at

Dasarahalli Village.

41. Sri. Shashikiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel

appearing for petitioner would reiterate the arguments

advanced in W.P.No.47822/2015 and he would rely upon the

judgment rendered in W.P.No.47819/2015 on 19.08.2017 by

646

the Coordinate, Bench which has been annexed to file on

26.05.2018.

W.P.No.47822/2015:

42. The Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

case while affirming the judgment of Division Bench had

issued further directions and clarification. Insofar as present

case is concerned, it would suffice to take note of the direction

No.(ii) issued under Paragraph 160, which reads as under:

“(ii). In regard to villages of Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where there are several very small pockets of acquired lands surrounded by lands which were not acquired or which were deleted

from the proposed acquisition, BDA may consider whether such small pockets should also be deleted if they are not suitable for forming self-contained Layouts. The acquisition thereof cannot be justified on the ground that these small islands of acquired land, could be

used as a stand-alone park or playground in regard to a Layout formed in a different unconnected lands in other villages. Similar isolated pockets in other villages should also be dealt with in a similar manner.”

43. It is a specific case of Sri. Shashikiran Shetty,

learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that

property bearing Sy.No.54/1A measuring 25 guntas owned by

petitioners was sought to be acquired to an extent of 12.5

guntas and initially under the Preliminary Notification dated

647

03.02.2003 other adjacent Survey numbers were also

proposed to be acquired and same was notified in the Final

Notification dated 23.02.2004, which was subsequently revised

pursuant to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case rendered by Hon’ble

Apex Court and as such revised Notification dated 18.06.2014

came to be issued whereunder an extent of 12.5 guntas in

Sy.No.54/1A alone was sought to be acquired or dropped from

the acquisition. Hence, contendig that perusal of directions

issued by Hon’ble Apex Court or in other words directions

issued by the Division Bench having not been followed by BDA

in its letter and spirit, he seeks for allowing writ petition.

W.P.No.47823/2015:

44. The subject matter of these two petitions are

Sy.Nos.103/3 and 103/4 situated at Nagawara village

measuring 9 and 10 guntas respectively. They are bounded on

east by Sy.No.103/5, west by Sy.No.102/2 north by

Sy.No.103/2 and south by Sy.No.102/5.

44.1 Insofar as Sy.No.103/5 is concerned, same has not

been notified for acquisition likewise Sy.No.103/2. However,

Sy.No.102/2 on the western side which was initially notified,

and subsequently came to be dropped from acquisition after

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Thus, in respect of this

648

composite property Sy.Nos.103/3 and 103/4, which is

surrounded by Sy.No.103/5 on the eastern side, Sy.No.102/2

on the western side, Sy.No.103/2 on the northern side and

Sy.No.102/5 on the southern side, are either not the subject

matter of acquisition or it has been deleted. Thus, prima facie

it would fall within the four corners of directions issued by the

Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAAMASWAMY’s case at

paragraph 160(ii).

W.P.No.47827/2015:

45. Sri. Shashikiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel

appearing for petitioner would reiterate the arguments

advanced in W.P.No.47822/2015 and submits that claims of

the petitioner would fall within the parameter laid down by

Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at

paragraph 160(ii).

W.P.No.57992/2015:

46. Heard.

46.1 Petitioner has contended in the petition that he and

his brothers are owners and in possession of the land bearing

Sy.No.117/1 measuring 47 guntas, is seeking for deletion of

said land by quashing Notification dated 18.06.2014 and to re-

649

consider the representation dated 26.11.2013 (Annexure-E),

whereunder he has sought for said land being dropped from

acquisition on the ground that adjacent lands have been

deleted subsequent to the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in

the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.

46.2 It is the contention of Sri. Somashekar, learned

Advocate appearing for petitioner that land in question is

surrounded by Sy.Nos.115 and 116 on the western side,

Sy.No.94 on the eastern side and Sy.No.118 on the northern

side have been dropped/deleted from acquisition and as such,

acquisition of land in question would be contrary to the

directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for allowing the

petition.

46.3 Sri B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate appearing for

respondent-BDA would reiterate the contentions raised in the

statement of objections and prays for dismissal of the writ

petition.

W.P.No.751/2016:

47. Petitioner is seeking for allotment of an alternate

site contending inter alia that on more than three occasions

650

sites were allotted in favour of petitioner and yet petitioner has

not been able to see the light of day of a site having been

allotted to him.

47.1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would

submit that site measuring 30’ x 40’ bearing No.184/E was

allotted on 30.12.2005 pursuant to which Lease-cum-Sale

Agreement executed on 27.06.2008 and Possession Certificate

though issued, BDA did not deliver possession of the site as

site was not available. Hence, on being called upon to execute

a Cancellation Deed, petitioner executed the same on

30.05.2005 prior to which an alternate site bearing No.632

was allotted on 29.12.2014 and Allotment Letter was also

issued on 15.07.2015. However, possession of said site was

also not delivered on the ground that it would fall within the

redo category as ordered by the Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, a new site bearing No.150 in

Survey No.204 was allotted at Sampigehalli Village, but

unfortunately the CD report disclosed that there was no such

site available.

47.2 Hence, petitioner being left in lurch has sought for

a writ of mandamus being issued to BDA to allot site in favour

651

of petitioner forthwith, as he had got registered himself for

allotment way back in the year 2005 and for the past 16 years

petitioner has been waiting for an allotment of a site. He

would also submit that petitioner was a Government Servant

at the time he applied for allotment and his fond hope of

having a shelter has got shattered on account of laxity

exhibited by the BDA in not allotting the site or allotting a site,

which is not in existence or allotting a site which is in dispute.

Hence, he prays for writ being issued as prayed for in the writ

petition.

47.3 Having regard to the aforesaid facts, we have

perused the case papers and same would disclose that

petitioner had sought for allotment of site from BDA in the

year 2005 under Government Servants category, with a fond

hope of constructing a house and had got himself registered

with the BDA. Petitioner was initially allotted a site in the year

2005, which site did not exist at all and as such he was forced

to execute a Cancellation Deed in respect of site allotted to him

i.e., site No.184/E, as the said site never existed or in other

words, it was not available for possession being delivered to

petitioner. Successive attempts made by the BDA to allot site

652

bearing Nos.632 and 150 did not materialize on account of

these two sites either being in the category of redo category or

CD report reflecting non-availability of the said sites.

47.4 Be that as it may. The fact remains that petitioner

has not been allotted site afresh after the execution of

cancellation deed in respect of site allotted to him. Hence,

petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought for.

W.P.2392/2016:

48. It is the contention of Sri Zulfikar Kumar Shaffi,

learned counsel appearing for petitioner, that property bearing

Survey No.24/1 measuring 22 guntas owned by the petitioner

is a landlocked property namely; on all the three sides i.e., on

the eastern side property bearing Survey No.24/2, on the

western side property bearing Survey Nos.19/1 and 19/2 and

northern side the land bearing Survey Nos.26/5a1 and 26/6 of

petitioner’s property, are all well developed land and said

survey numbers have been de-notified from acquisition. Even

on the southern side of the property belonging to the petitioner

there exists Nagawara Lake and as such proposed acquisition

in respect of petitioner’s land has to be necessarily deleted in

view of law laid down by the Apex Court in BONDU

653

RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for, acquisition insofar

as petitioner’s land is concerned, being quashed.

W.P.No.5446/2016:


issued to respondents to consider the claim of petitioner

contending his allotment as having been made in the year

2006, since similarly situated persons as per the list furnished

under Annexure-A, who were much below the list in the claim

for allotment of sites, had been allotted sites in the year 2006

and as such allotment made on 04.07.2013 was directed to be

considered as an allotment made in the year 2006.

Consequently, petitioner is seeking for resolution dated

23.09.2015 (Annexure-G) and endorsement dated 28.10.2015

(Annexure-H) issued to the petitioner to be quashed.

W.P.No.11295/2016:

50. Petitioner has been allotted a corner site by BDA

and as such learned counsel appearing for petitioner contends

that under the extant Rules of BDA a corner site cannot be

allotted and it is intermediary site, which can be allotted and

as such he has sought for an alternate site, being allotted to

the petitioner. Hence, he prays for a writ of mandamus being

654

issued by directing BDA to consider the representation of

petitioner for allotment of alternate

W.P.No.12010/2016:

51. It is the contention of learned counsel appearing for

petitioner that petitioner has paid excess amount than what

was demanded by the BDA and as such petitioner may be

refunded the excess amount and to the said extent, she seeks

for a writ of mandamus being issued by the BDA.

W.P.No.13637/2016:

52. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner has

sought for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to

consider the representation for allotment of site.

W.P.No.15833/2016:


petitioner that petitioner has purchased a site carved out of

Sy.No.26/5 situated at K.Narayanapura Village, K.R.Puram

Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, under a registered sale deed

dated 28.04.1997 and thereafter, revenue records were

mutated in his name as per Annexure-C to C-13 and in the

year 2003 said area has fallen within the jurisdiction of BBMP

and taxes have been paid to BBMP and khatha has been made

over in the name of petitioner. It is also contended that

655

petitioner came to know about the acquisition only in the year

2015 and immediately thereafter he has filed present writ

petition challenging the present Notification.

53.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Standing

Counsel appearing for petitioner opposing the prayer sought

for in the petition he would contend that petitioner is bound by

the judgment rendered by the Division Bench whereunder the

only remedy given to the revenue site holders is to make an

application and as such petitioner cannot feign ignorance in

the light of law laid down by the Apex Court. He would submit

that claim of the petitioner is in accordance with the dicta laid

down by the Division Bench, which is since been upheld by the

Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY's case and as such

petitioner would be entitled to an alternate site. He would

submit that only in order to overcome the latches a feeble

attempt has been made by pleading as though the petitioner

came to know about the acquisition only in the year 2015 and

having not challenged the acquisition proceedings at this

length of time, petitioner would not be entitled to relief sought

for. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

656

W.P.No.33385/2016:

54. Petitioners claim to be the owners of land bearing

Sy.No.35/1 measuring 2 acres 31 guntas situated at

Thanisandra Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.

54.1 It is the contention of Sri T Seshagiri Rao, learned

Advocate appearing for petitioners that entire property is built

up and land situated in all the four sides of the property has

been deleted.


respondent-BDA has contended that on the eastern side and

southern side, land bearing Sy.No.170/10B and 35/2

respectively have been acquired and have not been deleted. He

would also draw the attention of Court to the mahazar drawn

as per Annexure-R1 to contend that except building described

therein, entire land was vacant as on the date of mahazar

being drawn i.e., on 25.08.2003 and any further improvements

made by the petitioners would not enure to their benefit.

Hence, he submits that claim of the petitioners would not fall

within the parameters laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court in

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.

657

W.P.No.38919/2016:

55. Under the Preliminary Notification, an extent of 1

acre 11 guntas in Sy.No.11/10 of Jakkur Village (out of total

extent of 2 acres 21 guntas) has sought to be acquired under

Sl.No.28. Subsequent to Final Notification dated 23.02.2004,

an extent of 0.26 guntas was sought to be acquired under

Sl.No.18. Subsequent to the order of Division Bench and

Hon’ble Apex Court, an exercise has been undertaken by the

BDA, which resulted in Notification dated 18.06.2014 being

issued under which BDA has sought to acquire 0.14 guntas of

land as reflected at Sl.No.697 of said Notification. The

comprehensive plan which has been produced at Annexure-S

would clearly indicate that on the western portion of

Sy.No.11/10 is sought to be acquired. The lands so proposed

to be acquired is bounded on the northern side of Sy.No.10/4

and 10/3, which have not been acquired and on the southern

side of Sy.No.11/10 which is dropped from the acquisition and

on the eastern side bounded on Sy.No.13/2 has also been

deleted from the acquisition. On the western side, which is

bounded on Sy.Nos.11/1 and 11/2, have not been acquired at

all, which would clearly goes to show that it is the landlocked

658

land as indicated in paragraph 160(ii) of the BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case.

55.1 This factual matrix is not seriously disputed by the

learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In fact

statement of objections itself has not been filed in this petition.

Prima facie it would indicate that land in question is the

landlocked land.

W.P.No.47461/2016:

56. Petitioners are seeking for a direction to

respondents to allot sites measuring 40’ x 60’ formed in

Sy.Nos.17, 18, 19/1 & 31/1 of Venkateshpura and

Sampigehalli village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk.

56.1 It is the contention of Sri Adinarayan, learned

Advocate appearing for petitioners that petitioners and

similarly placed persons are members of third respondent –

society and an extent of 41 acres of land came to be in

possession of society, who developed the same into sites and

petitioner had been allotted a site and same is the subject

matter of acquisition by BDA for formation of Arkavati Layout.

By relying upon the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the

case of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case, petitioners seeks for a

659

direction to respondents to consider their representations for

allotment of site.

56.2 Per contra, Sri Lakshmeesh Rao, learned Advocate

appearing for respondent-BDA submits that sites have been

formed in the area, which has been acquired after taking

possession of said land. He further submits that petitioner

does not have any right, inasmuch as, there is no registered

sale deed in his favour and as such, question of considering

the claim for allotment of site would not arise.

56.3 Perusal of records would disclose that

undisputedly, petitioners are claiming right for allotment of

site based on allotment made by third respondent – society

during the year 2001. Undisputedly, there is no registered

sale deed executed in his favour. Petitioners had not

challenged acquisition proceedings at any point of time. Thus,

grievance of the petitioners, if any, has to be addressed by

third respondent, would not arise and as such, question of

issuing any writ in the nature of mandamus to second

respondent would not arise.

660

W.P.No.54790/2016:

57. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to

direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to acquire schedule property in

accordance with law and award compensation to the

petitioner.

57.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that out of 1 acre 20

guntas in Sy.No.42/3 possession to an extent of 20 guntas of

land has been forcibly taken by BDA for formation of Layout

and initially BDA had made an attempt to dispossess the

petitioner and suit was filed in O.S.No.1845/2010 and interim

order of temporary injunction was sought, which was denied

and on rejection of Interlocutory Application for temporary

injunction had been confirmed in MFA No.3564/2011 on

23.08.2011 with a direction to trial court to consider the claim

of plaintiff independently, which resulted in permanent

injunction being granted by virtue of judgment and decree

having been passed by the trial court, it is established that

petitioner’s land to the extent of 20 guntas has been forcibly

taken over by respondent-BDA and as such, he sought for

allowing the writ petition and granting the reliefs sought for.

661

57.2 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate

appearing for respondent-BDA would support the endorsement

dated 08.08.2016 – Annexure-N issued to petitioner

whereunder it has been stated that land belonging to the

petitioner has not been acquired.

57.3 Petitioner claims to have acquired title to the

property in question and on the premise that BDA was

attempting to interfere with the possession of land, suit came

to be filed in O.S.No.1845/2010 and interim order of

temporary injunction sought for was negatived and confirmed

in MFA No.3564/2011 by order dated 23.08.2011.

Subsequently, suit having been decreed, on the said basis

premise petitioner is seeking writ of mandamus in this writ

petition. Holistic reading of entire judgment and decree

passed by trial court would clearly indicate that plaintiff’s

possession over property in question has been reiterated by

the learned trial Judge and has held that petitioner was in

possession of the suit schedule property as on date of filing of

said suit vide paragraph 9 of the judgment. On the other

hand, consistent stand of respondent - BDA throughout is that

land in question measures 1 acre 20 guntas, out of which, 20

662

guntas is kharab land. As such, question of paying

compensation to the petitioner has been rejected by

respondent-BDA vide endorsement dated 08.08.2016 –

Annexure-N. In fact, said endorsement would disclose that

there was existing road already and if it is so, this court sitting

in writ jurisdiction would not be in a position to adjudicate the

disputed question of fact and as such, it would be open for the

petitioner to establish with regard to his title to the extent of

20 guntas and then seek for appropriate relief of payment of

compensation.

W.P.No.27750/2018:


petitioners that petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of

sites purchased by them under the respective sale deeds and

they have not been divested of the possession of properties and

as such acquisition proceedings in respect of these sites ought

to be quashed by quashing the Preliminary and Final

Notification.

W.P.Nos.59793/2016:

59. Petitioners who are owners of property bearing

Sy.No.21/5 of Kempapura village, measuring 1 acre 2 guntas

are before this Court seeking declaration that notice dated

663

06.09.2016 – Annexure-E issued by second respondent

whereunder petitioners are called upon to execute certain

documents and undertaking for receiving the land to an extent

of 40% i.e., an extent in the ratio of 60:40 for each acre.

59.1 Petitioners purchased the land in question on

17.01.2004 from one Sri. Manjappa, who in turn had

purchased the land from Sri. Anthonappa under registered

sale deed dated 26.04.1993. Proceedings came to be initiated

against said Sri. Manjappa alleging violation of Section 79A of

the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1973 and said proceedings

having attained Finality before Karnataka Appellate Tribunal

in Appeal No.79/2002 whereunder Tribunal set aside the order

of forfeiture dated 11.07.1997 and allowed the appeal by order

dated 19.08.2002.

59.2 During this interregnum period, land in question

came to be notified by BDA for acquisition for formation of

residential Layout known as ‘Arkavati Layout’ on account of

petitioners names having not been reflected in the acquisition

proceedings and alleging violation of principles of natural

justice, petitioners were before this Court in

W.P.Nos.31467/2011 & 40778/2013 for quashing of

664

Notification dated 23.02.2004 on the ground it was illegal.

Said writ petitions came to be disposed of by Co-ordinate

Bench on 30.09.2013 vide Annexure-A by observing to the

following effect:

“12. With regard to the factual situation on that aspect, certainly this Court will not go into that aspect at this juncture in a writ petition, since the same would have to be looked into by the respondents keeping in view not only the documents under which the petitioners No.1 to 3 have purchased the property, but the fact situation existing keeping in view the nature of construction, if any that is available therein, age of construction etc., so as to find out, whether such construction in fact existed much prior to the Preliminary Notification or not. On deciding this aspect, the appropriate relief as available to the petitioners under Para 160 of the judgment in Bondu Ramaswamy’s case would be made applicable to the petitioner. Therefore, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to proceed further with the acquisition proceedings as initiated, but to consider the case of the petitioners under the category where it would be admissible as stated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision referred to above.

13. In order to enable such consideration, the

petitioners shall now file all the necessary papers and copy of this order with the respondents within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondent No.2 shall thereafter consider the case of the petitioners in the manner as directed herein above and thereafter come to a conclusion with regard to the nature of relief to be granted. Such relief would be available to the petitioners No.1 to 3 jointly and the petitioner No.4 shall be excluded, since the petitioners No.1 to 3 have indicated that they have purchased the property from the petitioner No.4. The consideration of the respondent No.2 shall be concluded as expeditiously as possible, but not

665

later than six weeks from the date of copy being filed with the respondents. The further action, if any to be taken in that regard shall also be concluded as expeditiously as possible.”

60. Pursuant to the same, petitioners submitted

representation on 29.10.2013 enclosing order passed in the

writ petitions as well as other documents and pursuant to the

same, impugned endorsement/intimation came to be issued to

the petitioners. Thereafter, petitioners submitted

representation dated 19.09.2016 to the BDA contending that

claim of petitioners will have to be considered in accordance

with paragraph 160 of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. On

account of non-consideration of said representation,

petitioners are before this Court.

60.1 It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing

for petitioners that representation of petitioners has not been

considered in terms of directions/clarification issued by

Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and even

otherwise, records of BDA would itself demonstrates that land

of petitioners is in the midst of lands, which have already been

deleted and as such, question of continuing acquisition

proceedings would be diametrically opposite to the dicta laid

666

down by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.

It is also contended that when the authority itself has given up

neighbouring lands, question of continuing proceedings in

respect of land belonging to petitioners would not serve any

purpose and there cannot be formation of Layout in the

isolated pieces of land. Hence, he has prayed for allowing the

petition.


respondent No.-2-BDA would support acquisition proceedings

on the ground it has already been upheld by the Apex Court.

W.P.No.64534/2016:

61. Petitioner is seeking for an alternate site and as

such has sought for writ of mandamus being issued to

respondents.

61.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that BDA had

allotted a site in favour of petitioner bearing Sy.No.1313 and

even possession certificate also came to be issued pursuant to

which khatha was mutated in the name of petitioner and taxes

were also paid. However, BDA has cancelled khatha on the

ground that said site is to be allotted to the land owners in lieu

667

of they having given up their right over the lands, which have

been acquired for the formation of Layout. Hence, she seeks

for a writ of mandamus being issued to BDA for allotment of

alternate site.

W.P.No.815/2017 c/w W.P. No.6717/2016:

62. Petitioner was allotted a site bearing No.748 in 8th

Block, Arkavati Layout on 24.06.2006. Pursuant to which

Lease-cum-Sale Agreement was executed on 15.11.2007 and

Possession Certificate was issued on 17.11.2007. However, on

account of said site falling under the redo category, physical

possession of the site so allotted was not delivered in favour of

the petitioner. Hence, a representation came to be submitted

by the petitioner on 06.08.2014 for allotment of alternate site.

Acceding to the request made by the petitioner, a site bearing

No.BK90 was allotted on 31.05.2016. Thereafter allotment

process insofar as said site relating to the petitioner has got

stagnated for reasons unknown. Hence, petitioner has

invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court for issuance of

writ of mandamus to direct the BDA to perform its statutory

duty namely; to execute Lease-cum-Sale Agreement and

deliver possession of the property to petitioner.

668

W.P.No. 21361/2017:

63. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to the

respondent – BDA to execute absolute Sale Deed in respect of

site No.1170 contending that Lease-cum-Sale Agreement was

executed way back on 24.06.2006 and possession has been

delivered and Katha has also been mutated in the name of the

petitioner and for the reasons best known, BDA is not

executing Sale Deed.

63.1 Having regard to the aforestated facts petitioner

would be entitled to the relief sought for or in other words, it

has to be necessarily held that writ of mandamus is to be

issued to the respondents to execute the Sale Deed in respect

of site allotted to him. Mere pendency of proceedings would

not absolve the respondents-BDA from discharging its

statutory obligations, particularly when there being no order of

stay or injunction operating against the BDA to execute the

Sale Deed.

W.P.No.40596/2017:

64. Sy.No.4/4 which totally measures 1 acre 28 guntas

situated at Thanisandra Village has sought to be acquired to

an extent of 12 guntas, which is under challenge.

669

Sri.Nagabhushan, learned counsel appearing for petitioner by

reiterating the grounds urged in W.P.No.28861/2014 would

also rely upon the RTC Extracts (Annexure-A), which would

indicate that way back in the year 2000-01 name of the

petitioner has been entered in the revenue records or in other

words, revenue records came to be mutated in the name of

petitioner and yet BDA has not notified the name of khatedar

by including the name of petitioner, but issued Notification in

the name of a dead person. He would also submit that land

which is sought to be acquired is adjacent and abutting to land

which has not been notified and no useful or fruitful purpose

would be served in continuing the acquisition proceedings and

as such he prays for quashing of the proceedings.

W.P. No. 43194/2017:

65. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to the

respondents to consider the representations dated 03.05.2017

Annexures – F and F1, contending interalia, that petitioner

was the allottee of site bearing No.833 Annexure – A in Survey

No.8/5 of Sampigehalli Village. Pursuant to which, Lease-

cum-Sale Agreement was executed on 28.02.2007 and

Possession Certificate was also issued. It is also stated that

Katha of the said property was mutated in the name of

670

petitioner and he has been paying taxes. But surprisingly,

BDA executed a Sale Deed in respect of same property, which

was allotted to the petitioner in favour of one Sri Narayanappa

under a registered Sale Deed dated 05.07.2013 and as such a

representation was submitted on 03.05.2017 seeking for

cancellation of said Sale Deed and execution of absolute Sale

Deed in favour of the petitioner or alternatively to allot

alternate site. Undisputedly, in the instant case subsequent

purchaser who has acquired right over the property namely,

site said to have been allotted in favour of the petitioner, has

not been made a party, who is necessary and proper party. As

such question of granting relief of either cancellation of the

Sale Deed executed by BDA in favour of said Narayanappa or

declaring that petitioner could be the absolute owner of the

said site No.833 by virtue of Lease-Cum-Sale Agreement dated

27.02.2007 on executing by BDA, does not arise.

65.1 However, petitioner having been allotted site in the

year 2007 itself, pursuant to which a Lease-cum-Sale Deed

have also been executed, Possession Certificate issued, Katha

mutated in his name, BDA will have to necessarily consider his

671

claim for allotment of alternate site by considering the

representations dated 03.05.2017.

W.P.No.49031/2017:

66. Petitioner herein came to be allotted site bearing

No.721, Block VIII of Arkavati Layout on 24.06.2006. After

having paid Rs.2,27,300/- on 24.02.2007, Lease cum Sale

Agreement came to be executed on 17.05.2007 and khatha

was made over to the name of the petitioner. On account of

said site having been allotted in favour of erstwhile owners,

petitioner was allotted alternate site bearing No.1043 in Block

VIII and allotment letter was issued on 10.04.2014. Despite

submitting representations to issue possession certificate and

Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of site No.1043, BDA has

not executed the same. Hence, petitioner is before this Court

seeking for a direction to BDA to issue possession certificate

and to execute Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of Site

No.1043.

66.1 No statement of objections has been filed by BDA

controverting the averments made in the objections. This

would only indicate that BDA has no objection for writ of

mandamus being issued.

672

W.P.No.26667/2018:

67. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits

that as per the report of Special Land Acquisition Officer

(Annexure-K) it has been clearly stated therein that land

owned by the petitioners cannot be acquired and as such

representation has been submitted to BDA for denotifying the

same and representations of petitioners having not been

considered, they are seeking for writ of mandamus being

issued to respondents to consider their representation. His

submission is placed on record.

W.P.No.53051/2018:

68. It is the contention of Sri. Nagabhushan, learned

counsel appearing for petitioner that property of the petitioner,

which he has inherited from his grandfather measures 39 feet

from East to West and 37 feet from North to South carved out

of from Sy.No.27/4B of Kempapura Village and said land

having been notified for acquisition, was the subject matter of

acquisition even under the earlier acquisition proceedings and

subsequently, by the impugned Notification a portion of

Sy.No.27/4B viz., to an extent of 20 guntas including the land

of petitioner is sought to be acquired giving a complete goby to

the direction issued by the Division Bench as well as Apex

673

Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and BDA has failed to

consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and

drawing the attention of court to paragraph 22 wherein the

adjacent survey numbers have been indicated, which are said

to have been deleted by BDA, proposed acquisition of

Sy.No.27/4B is sought to be quashed. He would also contend

that in view of adjacent land owners in respect of very same

survey numbers having been deleted, if the land of petitioner is

sought to be acquired without considering prayer for deletion,

it amounts to considering equals by unequals thereby hit by

Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Hence, he prays for

allowing the writ petition.

W.P.Nos.15096/2019: 69. It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing

for petitioners that land bearing Sy.No.4/4 of Horamavu

village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, which is

sought to be acquired under the Notification dated 18.06.2014

is to be deleted and by relying upon directions issued in

W.A.No.2624/2005, petitioners claim that they are entitled for

alternate sites in the event of prayer for deletion of sites in

question is not acceded to.

674

69.1 Per contra, learned Advocates appearing for

respondent-BDA would support the acquisition proceedings

and contend that petitioners are subsequent purchasers and

as such, they would not get any right and they pray for

dismissal of writ petitions.

69.2 Perusal of the records in W.P.No.15096/2019

would disclose that mother of petitioner acquired title to the

property bearing Sy.No.4/4 under registered sale deed dated

22.06.1995 and subsequently, gift deed has been executed in

favour of petitioner in the year 2008 by which time,

Preliminary Notification and Final Notification had been

issued.

69.3 Working plan of Sy.No.4/4 of Byrathikhane earlier

known as Horamavu Agara village has been perused, which

would indicate that on the northern side of Sy.No.4/4,

Sy.No.4/6 is existing which has already been acquired. On the

Western side, Sy.No.3/1 is located which has been acquired

and on the eastern side, Sy.No.15/1 has also been acquired

and so also on the southern side. Petitioner has undisputedly

claimed title to the property based on the gift deed executed in

the year 2008, which is subsequent to the Notification dated

675

03.02.2003 and has not submitted any representation to the

BDA, pursuant to order passed by Division Bench in

W.A.No.2624/2005.

W.P.No.27833/2014:

70. Petitioner is seeking for quashing of the acquisition

of lands as notified under the impugned Notification insofar as

it relates to 1 acre 12 guntas in Sy.No.30 of Sampigehalli

village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore

contending interalia that said land was sold to the petitioner

after notifying the said land to be available for public auction

vide notice dated 11.04.2007 – Annexure-B, pursuant to which

petitioner participated and was a successful bidder and has

deposited the entire amount. It is also contended that auction

sale has been approved by the appropriate Government on

11.05.2007 – Annexure-D and possession of the land was

delivered on 18.10.2008. Thereafter, petitioner had sought

permission of the appropriate Government to put up a

compound wall and Deputy Commissioner by communication

dated 31.10.2008 – Annexure-AC, permitted the petitioner to

put up compound wall. It is also stated that certificate of sale

also came to be issued by the Deputy Commissioner on

01.07.2013 – Annexure-AF. It is also contended that at this

676

point of time, if the proceedings for acquiring said land

initiated at the behest of the BDA if allowed to continue, it

would not only cause financial hardship to the petitioner but

he would be put to irretrievable loss. Hence, on this ground,

petitioner seeks for deletion of land in question from being

acquired.

71. Per contra, Sri.K.Krishna, learned Advocate

appearing for respondent-BDA by reiterating the grounds

urged in the statement of objections would contend that

pursuant to Preliminary Notification dated 03.02.2003 and

Final Notification dated 23.02.2004, award came to be passed

on 25.11.2004 to an extent of 7 acres. He would also contend

that on account of dispute pending with regard to an extent of

7 acres and there being order of status-quo granted on

15.07.2014, no further development has taken place to the

extent of 7 acres and land in question having been classified

as gomal land and same being vacant and not falling under

any of the categories as indicated by the Division Bench of this

Court and clarified by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY 's case, he prays for dismissal of the petition.

677

W.P.Nos.47606/2014:

72. Petitioner claiming to have purchased a revenue

site under a registered sale deed dated 04.12.2013 for valuable

consideration is seeking for declaring the land in question

which has been Reserved for Future Development (RFD) for the

implementation of scheme for Arkavati Layout relating to

Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6, is without jurisdiction and

unenforceable; for a writ of mandamus to direct the

respondents to delete the land bearing Sy.No.45/5 belonging

to petitioner for the scheme of formation of Layout; and, to

declare that depicting of land belonging to petitioner in the

development plan and map for implementing the scheme for

formation of Arkavati Layout is without jurisdiction and

unenforceable against petitioner.

72.1 It is contended that Sy.No.45/5 was never acquired

and as such question of invoking the doctrine of eminent

domain insofar as site belonging to petitioner carved out of

Sy.No.45/5 does not arise and it would fall outside the

acquisition proceedings. Hence, petitioner seeks for allowing

the prayer sought for in the writ petition.

678

72.2 Respondent/BDA has specifically contended that

there is no Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 in Dasarahalli Village but on

the other hand, it is only the Sy.No.45, which totally measures

9 acres 3 guntas and it is mufut kaval, Government kharab

land and alleged purchase of land by petitioner on 04.12.2013

is after 10 years of the date of issuance of Preliminary

Notification and as such petitioner do not get any right over

the property and sale itself is void. He would also contend that

petitioner has nowhere contended that as to how the

predecessor in title of the petitioner acquired the right over

suit property and alleged grant is not produced.

72.3 Sri.K.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for

respondent/BDA has made available the copy of map depicting

subject property i.e., Sy.No.45 wherein it has been reflected as

‘mufut kaval kharab’ of 9 acre 3 guntas is sought to be

acquired. Whereas in the photocopy of the Preliminary

Notification dated 23.02.2004 produced at Annexure-C an

entry has been reflected as ‘45/P’ and what is sought to be

acquired is 1 acre 3 guntas, even the boundaries on East,

West, North and South has been reflected improperly.

Whereas in respect of serial number 43 and 45 the boundaries

as well as extent, which has been reflected, is same as that

679

being reflected in the original gazette Notification. This itself

speak the conduct of BDA in attempting to dodge the court

from perusing the records. As already noticed hereinabove,

petitioner, who claims to be a revenue site owner, has

purchased the property in question on 04.12.2013 i.e., after 10

years of the issuance of Preliminary Notification on

03.02.2003. Hence, petitioners are not entitled to the relief

sought for.

W.P.Nos.47607/2014:

73. Petitioner claiming to have purchased a revenue

site under a registered sale deed dated 18.03.2013 for valuable

consideration has sought for declaring the land in question

which has been Reserved for Future Development (RFD) for the

implementation of scheme for Arkavati Layout relating to

Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 is without jurisdiction and

unenforceable; for a writ of mandamus to direct the

respondents to delete the land bearing Sy.No.45/5 belonging

to petitioner for the scheme of formation of Layout; and, to

declare that depicting of the land belonging to petitioner in the

development plan and map for implementing the scheme for

formation of Arkavati Layout is without jurisdiction and

unenforceable against petitioner.

680

73.1 It is contended that Sy.No.45/5 was never acquired

and as such question of invoking the doctrine of eminent

domain insofar as site belonging to petitioner carved out of

Sy.No.45/5 does not arise and it would fall outside the

acquisition proceedings. Hence, petitioner seeks for allowing

the prayer sought for in the writ petition.

73.2 Respondent/BDA has specifically contended that

there is no Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 in Dasarahalli Village but on

the other hand it is only the Sy.No.45, which totally measures

9 acres 3 guntas and it is mufut kaval, Government kharab

land and alleged purchase of land by petitioner on 18.03.2013

is after 10 years of the date of issuance of Preliminary

Notification and as such petitioner do not get any right over

the property and sale itself is void. He would also contend that

petitioner has nowhere contended that as to how the

predecessor in title of the petitioner acquired the right over

suit property and alleged grant is not produced.

73.3 Sri.K.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for

respondent/BDA has made available the copy of map depicting

subject property i.e., Sy.No.45 wherein it has been reflected as

‘mufut kaval kharab’ of 9 acre 3 guntas is sought to be

acquired. Whereas in the photocopy of the Preliminary

681

Notification dated 23.02.2004 produced at Annexure-C an

entry has been reflected as ‘45/P’ and what is sought to be

acquired is 1 acre 3 guntas even the boundaries on East, West,

North and South has been reflected improperly. Whereas in

respect of serial number 43 and 45 the boundaries as well as

extent which has been reflected is same as that being reflected

in the original gazette Notification. This itself speak the

conduct of BDA in attempting to dodge the court from

perusing the records. As already noticed hereinabove

petitioner, who claims to be a revenue site owner, has

purchased the property in question on 18.03.2013 i.e., after 10

years of the issuance of Preliminary Notification on

03.02.2003.

W.P.NO.1876/2016:

74. Petitioner claims to be the revenue site holder

having purchased the site carved out of Sy.No.33/1,

Dasarahalli village under a registered sale deed dated

21.10.1994. It is contended that despite submission of

representation dated 09.06.2012 to delete the site purchased

by petitioner, BDA has not favourably considered the same

and as such, she has sought for not only deleting the said site

from acquisition but has also sought for a direction to the

682

second respondent to consider her representation dated

09.06.2012 – Annexure-E.

74.1 The Division Bench while disposing of the matter,

insofar as revenue site holders are concerned, has extended an

olive branch by directing such of the revenue site holders to

register themselves as applicants for allotment under

Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules,

1984 within a period of two months from the date of order i.e.,

25.11.2005 and extendable for additional period of one month,

if sufficient cause is shown. However, records do not disclose

that petitioner has got registered with BDA.

74.2 Be that as it may. Even assuming for a moment

that pendency of cases before courts precluded the petitioner

from getting herself registered as directed by Division Bench is

a good ground to call upon the BDA to consider representation

of the petitioner, by itself would not suffice for the simple

reason that writ of mandamus can be issued only when there

is a statutory right vested in the applicant, demand made and

non-consideration of such demand by the authority. In this

regard, representation stated to have been submitted by the

petitioner which is at Annexure-E dated 09.06.2012 cannot be

construed as a valid representation, inasmuch as, it does not

683

bear acknowledgement for having submitted the said

representation to BDA or office copy would contain seal of BDA

and writ of mandamus to consider such representation cannot

be issued. However, in the interest of justice and in the light

of judgment rendered by the Division Bench directing the BDA

to consider the representations/applications submitted even

beyond the time prescribed, similar directions requires to be

issued to BDA, to consider the representations/applications

submitted by applicants-revenue site holders by keeping in

mind the observations made by the Division Bench and

Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, similar

relief deserves to be granted to petitioner also.

W.P.Nos.19783/2018:

75. Petitioner claims to be the owner of 2 sites (totalling

to an extent of 2 Acres 9 guntas) in Sy.No.46/2 situated at

Amruthahalli village and out of which 2 acres have been

notified for acquisition, contends that he has purchased 2 sites

bearing Nos.3 and 4 each measuring 40 X 72 ft. and that said

acquisition is liable to be interfered on the ground that

adjacent lands are fully built up as evident from the sketch

/plan- Annexure-A and it would meet the

clarifications/directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

684

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. He would also submit that

petitioner has constructed fairly a big residential houses and

for want of finance he could not construct regular house. He

would also submit that composite property of 2 acres is

notified and all the 3 sites are residential apartment buildings

and as such forming sites in isolated pocket i.e., in 2 acres

would be contrary to the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in

the BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for

allowing the petition.

75.1 Per contra, Sri. Krishna, learned counsel appearing

for respondent-BDA would support the acquisition proceedings

and he would contend that possession of 2 acres is taken and

sites are formed by BDA and 13 sites have already been

allotted to the applicants who had sought for sites. Hence, he

prays for dismissal of petition.

75.2 It has to be seen from the directions issued by

Division Bench and also clarifications/directions issued by the

Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, that land holders

whose lands have been locked are sought to be acquired and

residential sites are to be constructed in small pockets, same

could not serve the purpose for which land is sought to be

acquired. If the lands are not in isolated pocket or it would

685

form major chunk, proposed acquisition would suffice for BDA

for formation of sites and it is not open for the petitioner to

contend that even in such circumstances also, lands proposed

for acquisition are to be deleted.

W.P.No.2462/2015:

76. As already observed hereinabove, under the guise

of implementing orders of Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case, which was in furtherance of orders

passed by Division Bench whereunder several guidelines came

to be issued to BDA to ensure that where the lands sought to

be acquired is a landlocked area or in other words, island and

as such continuation of the acquisition proceedings would not

be favourable in the interest of both parties. Apex Court had

also directed BDA to drop such pocket of lands from being

acquired. Taking umbrage under this order, officials of BDA

seems to have gone on the spree of de-notifying the lands by

pick and choose methods. In other words, there being no

transparency and obviously to favour such of those persons

whom they thought is to be favoured, the glaring example for

such incidents can be noticed in respect of lands bearing

Sy.No.89/1 situated at Nagavara village, Map of which lands

686

has been produced by learned panel counsel appearing for

BDA, boundaries as described in the said Map reads as under:

East by: Sy.No.87 not acquired

West by: Sy.No.90 which is not included in the

Final Notification

North by: Sy.No.102/5 notified for acquisition

South by: Sy.No.89/2 notified for acquisition and later

on not included in the revised Final

Notification.

76.1 Sri. B.S. Sachin, learned panel counsel appearing

for BDA would fairly submit that there is mis-description of

the property in the sketch, particularly on the boundary of

eastern side of Sy.No.89/1. As could be seen from the map,

eastern side boundary i.e.,Sy.No.89/1 is recorded as Sy.No.90,

though it is Sy.No.102/5 and Sy.No.87. In fact, eastern

boundary is 89/2 as well as 89/5 and 89/5 is not abutting

Sy.No.89/1.

76.2 Even according to BDA, Sy.No.89/1 of the

Nagavara village measures 13 guntas and out of which, 2

guntas is Kharab land and remaining 11 guntas is said to have

been included under the acquisition namely, under the revised

Notification dated 18.06.2014 at Sl.No.1178. However, in

compilation of documents furnished to the court at part 1-B

687

relating to Nagavara village, which is at page Nos. 439 to 443,

Sy.Nos.89/1, 89/5, 89/9 have been left out. In the map which

has been made available to the court insofar as Nagavara

village is concerned, Sy.No.90 has not been included in the

Notification at all. Though, nothing is placed on record,

learned counsel appearing for the BDA submits that it is a

Layout which is approved by the BDA.

Be that as it may. Pleadings are lacking in this regard.

Even in respect of Sy.No.87, which is reflected as southern

boundary and Sy.No.89/1, which has not been notified for

acquisition. Likewise, Sy.No.89/2 which is not only abutting

and adjacent to Sy.No.89/1, southern side of Sy.No.89/1 has

not been included in the Notification. Sy.No.89/5 which is a

pocket of 7 guntas of land is sought to be acquired and despite

bringing to the notice of BDA by the owner of land bearing

Sy.No.89/5 indicating that Sy.No.89/2 has not been acquired

and Sy.No.89/6 is also left out, reason for including only 89/5

that too measuring 7 guntas of land which is island, no

reasons are forthcoming. As such this court has been

perforced to observe hereinabove that strategy has been

adopted by BDA by use of pick and choose method to de-notify

688

the land subsequent to orders of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case

passed by Hon’ble Apex Court. It requires serious examination

and officials who have indulged in such acts cannot go un-

punished. However, truth has to be ascertained in that regard

and it is left to the authorities to consider these aspects for

taking action against erring officials.

W.P.Nos.3178/2017 c/w 55737/2016, 10923/2015, 58734/2016, 15588/2017, 14868/2017, 30485/2017 & 59317/2016:

77. It is the contention of Sri.C.M.Nagabhushan,

learned Advocate appearing for petitioners that petitioners are

allottees of the sites much prior to acquisition proceedings

being set aside by learned Single Judge and on account of

order passed by the learned Single Judge having been set

aside by Division Bench on 25.11.2005 in W.A.No.2624/2005

and connected matters, BDA has undertaken the exercise as

per the directions issued by Division Bench and in the process,

has denotified several lands on the premise that they would

fall within the parameters indicated in the operative portion of

the order passed by the Division Bench and as such, site

owners/land owners were entitled to the relief sought for and

exercise undertaken by BDA is erroneous and contrary to the

facts. Assailing the same, petitioners are before this court for

689

a direction to BDA to consider their representations and also

to quash the Notification dated 18.06.2014.

77.1 Per contra, Sriyuths B.S.Sachin, K.Krishna and

Goutham Dev C Ullal, learned Advocates appearing for

respondent-BDA reiterated the contentions urged, pleas

advanced and facts pleaded in the statement of objections.

This Court Has already noticed the gist of arguments of

petitioners' counsel and reply arguments of respondents

counsel hereinabove.

77.2 Having regard to the rival contentions and on

perusal of records, it would clearly disclose that there is no

dispute to the fact that acquisition of lands, which is the

subject matter of these writ petitions was for the purpose of

formation of Arkavati Layout.

77.3 The Division Bench has upheld the acquisition of

lands for the purposes of formation of Arkavati Layout. It

came to be held:

“106. The acquisition of the lands for formation of Arkavati Layout is upheld subject to the following conditions:

106(C)(a) In so far as the site owners are concerned, they are entitled to the following reliefs:

(i) These site owners/writ petitioners shall register themselves as

690

applicants for allotment under the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984 within a period of two months from today (extendable by another one month by BDA, if sufficient cause is shown). Petitioners will have to pay only the registration fee. They need not pay initial deposit as their sites have been acquired and they have agreed not to receive compensation in regard to the sites under this arrangement.

(ii) The petitioners shall file applications for allotment of sites to BDA within three months from today in the prescribed form stating that they are applicants who were the petitioners in these writ petitions. Petitioners shall file their documents with BDA within a period of two months to enable BDA to verify the same.

(iii) BDA will treat them as applicants entitled to priority in allotment and allot each of them a site measuring 30’ x 40’ in Arkavati Layout or in any other nearby Layouts in Bangalore at the prevailing allotment prices subject to petitioners satisfying that twin requirements for allotment under the BDA (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984, that they must be the residents of Bangalore (10 year domicile) and should not be owning any residential property in Bangalore.

(iv) If there are no rival claimants for compensation in regard to the plots claimed by petitioners, and if the ownership of the petitioners in regard to their respective sites which have been acquired is not disputed, BDA

shall calculate the compensation payable to the petitioners and give credit to the same by adjusting the same towards the allotment price for the site to be allotted and call upon

691

the petitioners to pay the balance. Petitioners shall be given six months time for making payment. (To enable petitioners to know the amount of compensation which they will be entitled and to ascertain how much balance they should pay).

(v) If there are rival claimants in regard to the survey numbers or the sites or if any petitioners title in regard to the sites are challenged, BDA shall make a reference in regard to the compensation in regard to such site/land in question, to the Civil Court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the petitioners will have to sort out the matter before the Reference Court. In that event, such petitioners will have to pay the full allotment price within the time stipulated, without seeking adjustment of compensation for the acquired site.

(vi) If any of the petitioners does not fulfill the requirements for allotment, under the Allotment Rules, their cases may be considered for allotment of 20' x 30' sites as per the Rules containing incentive scheme for voluntary surrender of lands. For the purpose of the said scheme, such petitioners will be deemed to have voluntarily surrendered the sites;

(vii) The above scheme will be available to only those who are owners, as a consequence of execution of registered sale deeds in their favour prior to the date of Preliminary Notification (and not to GPA/Agreement Holders).

(D) Insofar as the landowners excluding the site owners, are entitled to the following reliefs.-- (i) All the petitioners who are the

landowners who are seeking dropping of

692

the acquisition proceedings insofar as their respective lands are concerned, on the ground that: (a) their lands are situated within green belt area; (b) they are totally built up; (c) properties wherein there are buildings constructed by charitable, educational and/or religious institutions; (d) nursery lands; (e) who have set-up factories; (f) their lands are similar to the lands which are adjoining their lands but not notified for acquisition at all, are permitted to make appropriate application to the authorities seeking such exclusion and exemption and producing documents to substantiate their contentions within one month from the date of this order. It is made clear that the BDA shall consider such request keeping in mind the status of the land as on the date of Preliminary Notification and to exclude any developments, improvements, constructions put up subsequent to the Preliminary Notification and then decide whether their cases are similar to that of the landowners whose lands, are notified for acquisition, notified and whose objections were upheld and no Final Notification is issued. In the event the BDA comes to the conclusion that the lands of those persons are similarly placed, then to exclude those lands from acquisition.

(ii) Petitioners who are interested in availing

this benefit shall make appropriate application within 30 days from the date of this order and thereafter the BDA shall give notice to those persons, hear

them and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.

(iii)Till the aforesaid exercise is undertaken

by the BDA and the applications filed by

693

the petitioners either for allotment of site or for denotifying or exemption sought for are considered their possession shall not be disturbed and the existing construction shall not be demolished. After consideration of the applications, in the light of the aforesaid directions, if the lands are not excluded then the BDA is at liberty to proceed with the acquisition.

(E) The BDA is directed to exclude the land bearing Sy. No. 9/1 measuring 0.27, 10/2 measuring 1.16 and 10/3 measuring 1.02 of land which are the subject-matter of W.P. Nos. 1353-1354/2005 filed by University of Agricultural Science Employees House Building Co-operative Society from acquisition. (F) W.P.No.28087 of 2004 is allowed and acquisition of land in respect of 53 acres of land in Nagavara Village which is the subject matter of the aforesaid Writ Petition is quashed.

(2) W.A.No.2757/2005 is partly allowed. In W.P.No.25807/2004 filed by Tata Housing Development Company in respect of land bearing Sy.Nos.17/1, 18, 19, 20, 26 and 94 situated at Hennur Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore, in all measuring about 26 acres 12 guntas, the finding of the learned single Judge is set aside. Liberty is granted to the petitioners therein to make appropriate application before the BDA for deleting the said land from acquisition in view of the policy decision of the Government dated 1.6.1995. On such representation the BDA shall consider the request and pass appropriate orders. In the event their contention is upheld the said extent of land shall stand excluded from acquisition. Otherwise acquisition in respect of the said lands stand and the BDA is at liberty to form the layout.”

(Emphasis supplied by this Court)

694

78. The aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench

came to be affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of

BONDU RAMASWAMY's case, with certain modifications and

clarifications as indicated thereunder:

“160. In view of the foregoing, we affirm the directions of the Division Bench subject to the following further directions and clarifications: (i) In regard to the acquisition of lands in

Kempapura and Srirampura, BDA is directed to reconsider the objections to the acquisitions having regard to the fact that large areas were not initially notified for acquisition, and more than 50% of whatever that was proposed for acquisition was also subsequently deleted from acquisition. BDA has to consider whether in view of deletions to a large extent, whether development with respect to the balance of the acquired lands has become illogical and impractical, and if so, whether the balance area also should be deleted from acquisition. If BDA proposes to continue the acquisition, it shall file a report within four months before the High Court so that consequential orders could be passed.

(ii) In regard to villages of Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where there are several very small pockets of acquired lands surrounded by lands which were not acquired or which were deleted from the proposed acquisition, BDA may consider whether such small pockets should also be deleted if they are not suitable for forming self-contained Layouts. The acquisition thereof cannot be justified on the ground that these small islands of acquired land, could be used as a stand-alone park or playground in regard to a Layout formed in different

695

unconnected lands in other villages. Similar isolated pockets in other villages should also be dealt with in a similar manner.

(iii) BDA shall give an option to each writ

petitioner whose land has been acquired for Arkavati Layout:

(a) to accept allotment of 15% (fifteen

percent) of the land acquired from him, by way of developed plots, in lieu of compensation (any fractions in excess of 15% may be charged prevailing rates of allotment).

OR (b) in cases where the extent of land

acquired exceeds half an acre, to claim in addition to compensation (without prejudice to seek reference if he is not satisfied with the quantum), allotment of a plot measuring 30' x 40' for every half acre of land acquired at the prevailing allotment price.

(iv) Any allotment made by BDA, either by

forming Layouts or by way of bulk allotments, will be subject to the above.”

(Emphasis supplied by this Court)

78.1 Thus, it can be noticed from the order of Division

Bench that an olive branch was extended to the bonafide

purchasers of sites from BDA, from House Building

Cooperative Societies, as well as owners of those lands which

was acquired for the purposes of formation of Arkavati Layout.

It came to be held that in the event of parameters laid

thereunder were to be satisfied by the respective site

696

owner/land owners, as the case may be, such of those persons

would be entitled to the relief sought for. In fact, the Hon’ble

Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case supra having

upheld the decision of Division Bench issued certain directions

to the BDA in the concluding paragraph-160, which is already

noticed hereinabove to salvage the acquisition and to avoid

hardships to BDA and its allottees and to avoid prolonged

further rounds of litigation emanating from the directions of

the High Court, in order to uphold the decision of the Division

Bench, but subject to BDAs actions to certain corrective

measures by requiring it to reexamine take certain aspects and

provide an option to the land losers to secure some additional

benefit, as an incentive to accept the acquisition.

78.2 Thus, acquisition of the land for Arkavati Layout

having been upheld by the Division Bench of this court and

affirmed by the Apex Court, question of re-examining the said

issue in these writ petitions would not arise. However, it

requires to be noticed that a valiant attempt has been made by

the writ petitioners to contend that on account of

representations submitted by the petitioners/land losers under

Section 17(5) of BDA Act, Notification issued under Section

697

19(1) of BDA Act is bad in law. It requires to be noticed at this

juncture itself that said Notification was issued pursuant to

order of the Division Bench as affirmed in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case resulting in re-modified scheme of

Arkavati Layout being sanctioned. The representations

submitted by the land losers having been considered by the

BDA, ipso facto does not wipe out the impugned Notification.

It also requires to be noticed that representations of the land

losers was considered, as directed by the Apex Court in

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.

78.3 Yet another contention which has been raised is

that BDA Act does not provide for second Notification. In fact,

Notification dated 18.06.2014 is not a SFN and it is a

misnomer. It could be seen from the records that enquiry

came to be conducted by the BDA pursuant to directions

issued by the Division Bench as well as by the Apex Court and

report was submitted to the Government, which resulted in

983.36 of lands being deleted and an extent of 1766 acres was

retained. In fact, the scheme which was sanctioned earlier,

stood modified by the Government. The expression and words

found in the impugned Notification 18.06.2014 is a complete

698

answer to the contentions raised by the petitioners and same

reads:

“Whereas the Government of Karnataka has approved a Re-modified Scheme for the formation of Arkavati Layout vide Government Order No. UDD/426/MNJ/2011, Bangalore, dated: 03.04.2014 in modification of the Scheme sanctioned vide Government Order No. UDD 193 MNX 2004, Bangalore, dated 21.02.2014.”

78.4 Hence, contention raised that Notification dated

18.06.2014 is bad in law on account of BDA Act not providing

for the same, is rejected. It would not be out of context to

state that Notification in question is a replacement of earlier

Notification based on the re-modified scheme. Particularly

when acquisition having been upheld subject to the

modifications, clarifications and directions issued, resulting in

appropriate Government issuing a modified Notification, would

not wipe out the acquisition proceedings itself. The impugned

Notification only replaces the earlier Notification. A reference

has been made to Section 3 and 7 of the Land Acquisition Act,

1894, in the impugned Notification and as such impugned

Notification is liable to be set aside, since it is under a repealed

New Act, is an argument which requires to be brushed aside

699

for two (2) reasons; firstly, impugned Notification is only

replacement of the earlier Notification, which was on account

of directions issued by the Apex Court; secondly, under

Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, Act prior to 2013 is

indeed saved. In fact, power to amend is always available to

the Government, inasmuch as, power to issue would include

power to amend, vary or rescind the Notifications and orders in

terms of Section 21 of General Clauses Act. In the matter of

M.P.GANGADHARAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF

KERALA AND OTHERS reported in (2006) 6 SCC 162 the

Hon’ble Apex Court has held:

"14. In terms of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, (corresponding to the relevant provisions in the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1925) the power to issue would include the power to amend, vary or rescind, Notifications and orders. If a Notification could be issued establishing a Family Court at Manjeri, we do not see any reason why another Notification cannot be issued by the State to shift the said court to another place but within the same area of the Family Court. In terms of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, the State Government will indisputably have jurisdiction to abolish a Family Court and establish one at another place. If such an extensive jurisdiction can be exercised by the State, we fail to comprehend as to why its jurisdiction should be held to be

limited in the matter of shifting of court from one place to another but within the same area, particularly, in view of the fact that in terms of

700

sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Act even a change in the area is permissible."

79. Successive Final Notifications for acquisition of

land on behalf of BDA is permissible and this Court in

W.P.No.16590/2004 disposed on 19.11.2013 has held that

BDA is empowered to issue SFN. It has been further held:

“8. In so far as WP 27731/2012 is concerned, it is contended that the Scheme has been substantially implemented and hence the petitioners are estopped from questioning the same.

In the light of the above contentions, the points

that would arise for consideration are as follows :

i.) Has the Scheme, pursuant to which the acquisition proceedings had been initiated, lapsed by virtue of non- implementation of the same vis-à-vis the lands of the petitioners herein.

ii.) Whether the State government is enabled to issue successive Notifications under Section 19 of the BDA Act.

It is to be noticed that a common ground raised

in all the petitions is that the Scheme sanctioned and approved by the State government under Section 18(3) of the BDA Act has not been implemented even after long lapse of time and much beyond the period, within which it ought to have been implemented, as contemplated under Section 27 of the said Act. It is also the common ground that the possession of the respective extents of land has remained with the

petitioners. Though that fact is sought to be disputed by the BDA, it is not the case of the BDA that it has developed any layout over any of the said lands. In WP 27731/2012, the BDA has not even claimed to have taken possession of the land in question.

701

The following observations of a learned single judge in the case of R. Adikesavulu Naidu v. the State of Karnataka , ILR 2011 Kar 3657, are relevant :

"90. Insofar as the acquisition proceedings

are concerned, even on admitted facts and by the operation of Section 27 of the BDA Act, if the scheme has lapsed even before the stage of the lands notified for acquisition vesting in the State and taking possession of the subject land after passing of the Award had not been reached, it is obvious that the acquisition proceedings get aborted due to the scheme lapsing and if the subject land notified for acquisition had not vested in the State within a period of five years from the date of issue of the Final Notification a period within which the scheme is required to be implemented substantially to avoid the scheme lapsing in terms of Section 27 of the BDA Act, in law even assuming for argument sake, award is passed, possession is taken after expiry of this period as a matter of fact under the enabling provisions of Section 11 of the LA Act to pass an award and the further enabling provision of section 16 of the LA Act for taking possession of the subject land also, but these statutory provisions being not available to the state and the BDA any more due to Section 27 of the Act whereafter alone the land vests absolutely in the Government in the wake of Section 36 of the BDA Act and if there is no way in law to take the acquisition proceedings also to its logical conclusion as the original purpose of acquisition itself is lost, it is obvious this is a situation attracting legal consequence of not only the scheme lapsing but also the acquisition proceedings lapsing.

91. It is necessary to bear in mind the distinction between the acquisition proceedings being quashed at any stage of the acquisition proceeding due to non-adherence of the statutory provisions and the

702

procedure and a situation of the acquisition proceedings per se lapsing due to the scheme lapsing in terms of Section 27 of the BDA Act and by that time if the acquisition proceedings having not been completed and therefore the acquisition proceedings being left midway without completion and when the matter is before the Court for examination at the instance of persons claiming interest in the subject lands, by a sense of fairness, by a duty to act in a constitutional manner, a duty to ensure that the State and public bodies which is the 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India abide by the constitutional provisions and statutory provisions and do not give scope for discriminatory act in respect of some persons who are situated in a like position as others, this Court is compelled to exercise its constitutional writ jurisdiction for quashing the proceedings and the orders of the State and the authorities akin to the State which are left incomplete, and which do not serve any purpose any more leave alone serving a public purpose and therefore writ of certiorari should be issued to put an end to this 'trishanku' stage of acquisition proceedings by quashing the incomplete acquisition proceedings."

As regards the contention that there could not be successive Final Notifications under Section 19 of the BDA Act is concerned, a learned single judge of this court has considered the question in a particular context and has held in the affirmative, in the case of B. K. Nanjudaiah v. BDA , ILR 1987 Kar 2977. The petitioners in that case claimed to be the owners of land in Survey No.16 of Malagalu village, Bangalore North Taluk, measuring about 5 acres 20 guntas. The land stood in the name of the father of the first

petitioner therein, on the death of the father of the petitioner, there was a dispute between the petitioners in respect of the land, which was the subject matter of a civil suit in OS 222/1980, before the Court of the Civil Judge, Bangalore. The same

703

stood settled under a compromise decree. Petitioner no.1 was conferred 2 acres 30 guntas and Petitioners 2 and 3 together took 2 acres 30 guntas , in terms of the compromise. The said land along with several other lands were notified for acquisition under the BDA Act, for the formation of the Nagarabhavi II Stage layout. A Preliminary Notification was published in the gazette dated 26-8-1982. A Final Notification was issued on 5-8-1986. The same was challenged. One of the grounds of challenge was that, since the State government had published a Final Notification in respect of Nagarbhavi I Stage layout, as on 16-8-1985 - pursuant to the Preliminary Notification dated 26-8-1982,the State government had no competence to issue a second Final Notification on the basis of the same Preliminary Notification. In that, it was contended that since the petitioners' lands did not find mention in the first Final Notification dated 16-9-1985, the State government must be deemed to have abandoned the scheme. State of MP v. Vishnu Prasad, AIR 1966 SC 1593, was cited in support of the argument. The apex court had held thus in Vishnu Prasad:

"There is nothing in Ss, 4, 5-A and 6 to suggest that S.4(1) is a kind of reservoir from which the government may from time to time draw out land and make declarations with respect to it successively. If that was the intention behind sections 4, 5-A and 6 we would have found some indication of it in the language used therein. But as we read these three sections together we can only find that the scheme is that S.4 specifies the locality, then there may be survey and drawing of maps of the land and the consideration whether the land is adapted for the purpose for which it has to be acquired, followed by objections and making up of its mind by the government what particular land out of that locality it needs. This

is followed by a declaration under S.6 specifying the particular land needed and that in our opinion completes the process and the Notification under S.4(1) cannot be further used thereafter. At the stage of S.4 the land is

704

not particularised but only the locality is mentioned; at the stage of S.6 the land in the locality is particularised and thereafter it seems to us that the Notification under S.4(1) having served its purpose exhausts itself. The sequence of events from a Notification of the intention to acquire [S.4(1)] to the declaration under S.6 unmistakably leads one to the reasonable conclusion that when once a declaration under Section 6 particularising the area out of the area in the locality specified in the Notification under Section 4(1) is issued, the remaining non-particularized area stands automatically released." Negating the argument, the learned judge, while

interpreting the scope of Section 19 - laid down as follows :

"13. xxx xxxx Section 19, on which the arguments is constructed, reads thus:

"19. Upon sanction, declaration to be published giving particulars of land to be acquired- (1) Upon sanction of the scheme, the Government shall publish in the official Gazette declaration stating the fact of such sanction and that the land proposed to be acquired by the Authority for the purposes of the scheme is required for a public purpose."

14. It is seen from sub-section (1) of this Section that the declaration to be published in the official Gazette has to mention the land proposed to be acquired by the authority for the purpose of the scheme and such declaration shall state the limits, for which is needed and its approximate area and the place where a plan of the land may be inspected. There is nothing in the Act from which it can be culled out that acquisition of part of the area comprised in the scheme would render the entire scheme to lapse

though the remaining area which is already contemplated in this scheme under the Act is not acquired at that stage, the scheme lapses if there is no substantial compliance with the scheme within five years as contemplated

705

by Section 27. No other provision in the Act mentions about the lapsing of the scheme. Therefore it is difficult to appreciate that by acquiring some portions of the lands in the scheme, the entire scheme lapses. It has to be remembered that the B.D.A. is required to under take development work from time to time since it has to incur expenditure and has to execute the developmental schemes. This takes me to the definition of the words 'development and engineering operations' provided in clause (2)(j) and (k), which reads thus:

"(j) 'development' with its grammatical

variations means the carrying out of building, engineering, or other operations in or over or under land or the making of any material change in any building or land and includes redevelopment;

(k) 'engineering operations' means formation or laying out of means of access to road".

The above scheme is framed for achieving

the objects for which the authority is constituted as per Section 14 of the Act. This object, obviously cannot be achieved at one stretch and requires to be achieved by stages.”

15. In the instant case, by declaration dated

16.8.1985 and 7.9.1985, an extent of 357 acres and 2 guntas in Nagarbhavi village and 163 acres 14 guntas in Malagalu village was sought to be acquired for Nagarbhavi I stage and by Notification dated 5.8.1986, an extent of 292 acres 5 guntas in Nagarbhavi village and 312 acres 5 guntas in Malagalu was sought to be acquired. This has to be resorted to because without completing the I stage, the authorities could not have undertaken the development work as defined, for the II stage."

The question again arose for consideration in

relation to acquisition proceedings under the provisions of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (Hereinafter referred to as the

706

'KIAD Act', for brevity), namely, whether successive Final Notifications under Section 28(4) of the KIAD Act, could be issued. A division bench of this court dealing with the issue in WA 3189-3201/2010 and connected cases, dated 20-11-2012, has held that with the amendment to Section 5-A and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the basis of the judgment in Vishnu Prasad Sharma's case was taken away. And that as the law stands to-day, it was permissible to make successive Notifications under Section 6(1) of the LA Act. By the issuance of a Notification under the said provision, in respect of only a portion of the land which is the subject matter of Section 4(1), the said Preliminary Notification would not lapse in respect of other provisions of the land in respect of which 6 (1) Notification is not issued.

While addressing the argument that as there

were no corresponding amendments to the KIAD Act, as brought about under the LA Act and therefore the dictum in Vishnu Prasad Sharma yet being drawn into service, the division bench on an elaborate analysis of the relevant provisions has held thus :

"19. Therefore, from the aforesaid

provisions as well as from the discussion as above, it is clear the Apex Court in Vishnu Prasad Sharma's case was constrained to hold that successive declarations are not permissible because Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act provided for consideration of all objections made to the Notification under Section 4(1) and one report thereafter to the Government. Similarly the Government after considering the report made under Section 5A had to make up its mind whether particular land is needed for public purpose or not and then issue a declaration under Section 6(1). Correspondingly there is no provision in the Act for considering all objections made to

the Notification under Section 28(1) of the Act. There is no provision for submission of one report to the Government. There is no provision for consideration of any such report by the Government before issuing a

707

declaration under section 28(4) of the Act. On the contrary, the language of the Act makes it very clear the Government has to consider the cause shown by the owner of the land and may pass such order as it deems fit and if it is satisfied that any such land should be acquired for the purpose specified in the Notification, it may issue a declaration. In the light of the marked difference in the language employed in Section 28, there is no scope for holding that successive Notifications are not permissible in law. In fact the legislature did not amend the Act because in the Act the provisions similar to consideration of all objections together, submission of a report and consideration of a report and issuing Final Notification are conspicuously missing. If those words had been there and if they had not been amended, then the judgment of the Apex Court would have to be applied with full force. Therefore, merely because the State legislature did not bring about any amendment as was done by the Parliament, it would in no way support the case of the petitioners. Such an amendment in the facts of this case was wholly unnecessary.

20. In the light of what is stated above

we are of the view that the learned Single Judge was justified in holding that under the Act, issuance of successive declarations is permissible. It is not out of place to mention here the acquisition of land under the Act is for an industrial purpose. Under the scheme of the Act first a Notification has to be issued under Section 3(1) of the Act specifying the area to be an industrial area for the purpose of this Act. Section 3 reads as under:

3. Declaration of industrial areas:

(1) The State Government may, by Notification, declare any area in the State to

708

be an industrial area for the purposes of this Act. (2) Every such Notification shall define the limits of the area to which it relates.

21. The object of this provision is to

inform the public that the State Government has taken a decision to form an industrial estate in a particular area, so that the said area may not be used for any other purpose. In fact, Section 4 of the Act specifically provides for alteration of industrial area after issue of a Notification under Section 3(1) of the Act specifying and declaring any area in the State to be an industrial area. The power is vested under Section 4 of the Act to exclude from any industrial area, any area or include therein any additional area as may be specified in such Notification. That is the only mode by which an area which is declared as an industrial area can be excluded from the industrial area. Though the Act came into force from 26th Day of May 1966, Chapter-VII of the Act which deals with acquisition and disposal of land were not made applicable to the entire state of Karnataka. It is only when a land is to be acquired for the purpose of industrial development, after issue of a Notification under Section 3(1) of the Act, Notification has to be issued under Section 1(3) of the Act making Chapter-VII applicable. After Chapter-VII is made applicable to a particular area, then the Government is vested with the power under Section 28(1) of the Act to issue a Notification expressing its intention to acquire such land. When such a land is notified it is not as if every owner of the land would object to the acquisition. There are number of owners

of the land who may be willing to give their consent to acquisition of the land and accept compensation payable under the Act. At the same time the very object of enacting this Act is establishment and development

709

of industrial area and for making available industrial land to the private entrepreneurs to start industries. If a land owner chooses to challenge the acquisition, certainly it takes time before the acquisition is completed. Therefore, under the scheme it is open to the Government to issue a Notification under Section 28(4) in respect of lands where there is no opposition to the acquisition or where they are able to serve the land owners, consider their objections and issue Notification for acquisition. If there is any delay in service of notice, if there are contests and any order of stay or injunction is obtained from Courts, it is not necessary for the Government to wait for conclusion of those proceedings before it could issue a Notification under Section 28(4) of the Act. That is precisely the reason why as is clear from the language employed in Sections 28(3) and (4), the Government is empowered to consider the cause shown by each owner and pass appropriate orders and issue declarations in respect of such owners under Section 28(4) of the Act. It serves the object of the Act. Similarly it also enables the owners of the land who are consenting for acquisition to get compensation expeditiously. Therefore, seen from all angles the legislature has consciously avoiding the pit falls which were found in the unamended provisions of Section 6 and 5A of the Act and to enable the Government to acquire land piece meal by issue of such successive Notifications have not adopted the procedure prescribed under the unamended Sections 6 and 5A of the L.A. Act. In that view of the matter we do not see any substance in the first contention.”

9. In the light of the views expressed herein above, it may be said that there is no provision under the BDA Act, to indicate that upon issuance of a Final Notification and acquisition of a part of the area comprised in the Scheme, that the other

710

lands covered under the Scheme would not be available for acquisition and that a second Final Notification is impermissible. As in any event, the Scheme would lapse if there is no substantial compliance with the Scheme.

10. In the result, the above points for

consideration are answered as follows :

The petitioners having demonstrated that though the lands of the petitioners were duly notified for acquisition, the possession of the lands having remained with the petitioners, even without the benefit of any interim orders of this court, and the Scheme under which the lands had been sought to be acquired, not having been substantially implemented, in so far as the petitioners' lands are concerned, the Scheme to that extent would lapse and the lands of the petitioners except to such extent as has not vested with the State, (the admitted extent of land, utilized for the formation of road- in WP 16590/2004) is no longer available for acquisition under the impugned Notifications.

11. There is no impediment in law for the State

to issue successive Notifications under Section 19 (1) of the BDA Act, but the succeeding Notification shall disclose valid and justifiable reason for such issuance. It is ideal for the State to ensure Finality in the issuance of a "Final Notification" in respect of the proposed acquisition as it would enable other land owners to proceed on the presumption that their land, which may have been initially notified, is outside the purview of the acquisition proceedings. Therefore, the State shall not normally resort to successive Final Notifications unless the land owners are forewarned of further impending Notifications. As seen in Nanjundaiah's case above, the State could very well have indicated that the remaining lands which were not notified in the "first" Final Notification are subject to be notified

before the expiry of five years from the date of the Preliminary Notification.”

711

80. The issue relating to inclusion of 500 acres of

Government land, inclusive of ‘B’ Kharab land without an

order being passed under Section 97 of the Karnataka Land

Revenue Act for diverting the said lands for formation of

Layout, is an issue between the Government and BDA and

necessarily the tank beds and ‘B’ Kharab lands will have to be

retained.

80.1 The contention relating to New Act being applicable

on account of award having not been passed and possession

has not been taken and therefore under Section 24(2) of the

New Act acquisition lapses, is an argument requires to be

considered for the purposes of rejection, inasmuch as,

acquisition having already been upheld by the Apex Court and

scheme having been formulated by the BDA for allotment of

developed land in the ratio of 60:40. In fact, 15% of the

developed plots has been ordered to be allotted to the land

owners and the Government Circular to allot plots to land

owners in the ratio of 60:40, payment of compensation does

not arise.

80.2 One another contention raised is that acquisition

lapsed under Section 27 of the BDA Act. Even when scheme

lapses under Section 27 of the BDA Act, acquisition does not

712

lapse as held by the Apex Court in the matter of OFFSHORE

HOLDINGS (P) LTD vs BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY & ORS reported in (2011) 3 SCC 139:

“38. On a conjunctive reading of the provisions of Sections 27 and 36 of the State Act, it is clear that where a scheme lapses, the acquisition may not. This, of course, will depend upon the facts and circumstances of a given case. Where, upon completion of the acquisition proceedings, the land has vested in the State Government in terms of Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, the acquisition would not lapse or terminate as a result of lapsing of the scheme under Section 27 of the BDA Act. An argument to the contrary cannot be accepted for the reason that on vesting, the land stands transferred and vested in the State/Authority free from all encumbrances and such status of the property is incapable of being altered by fiction of law either by the State Act or by the Central Act. Both these Acts do not contain any provision in terms of which property, once and absolutely, vested in the State can be reverted to the owner on any condition. There is no reversal of the title and possession of the State. However, this may not be true in cases where acquisition proceedings are still pending and land has not been vested in the Government in terms of Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act.”

Thus, what requires to be examined is:

“Whether the BDA has complied with the

directions issued by the Division Bench as

clarified and further directions issued by

Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

case?”

and consequentially it has to be examine the nature of exercise

that was undertaken by the BDA.

713

81. A plain reading of direction issued by the Division

Bench would indicate that a Memo was filed during the course

of hearing of the appeal by producing the maps of the area

showing lands in the village which are not notified, lands

which were notified under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, lands

which are notified under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act and said

areas depicted in different colours. On account of lands which

was proposed to be acquired did not form a contiguous area,

and in some of the village certain extent of lands notified under

the Final Notification were surrounded by large chunk of area,

which was not acquired, making access to said land difficult,

which was found to be heart-burning and as such BDA was

confronted with those hard facts. Contents of the said memo

reads:

"Memo filed by Appellant, the Bangalore Development Authority:

1. Without prejudice to the submission that

there is no discrimination in the matter of deletion of lands in the Final Notification and that deletion of certain lands will not invalidate either the Preliminary or the Final Notifications, it is submitted as follows.

2. If this Hon'ble Court were to come to the conclusion that the objections of certain landowners/writ petitioners to the Final Notification are to be considered afresh by the Bangalore Development Authority,

714

directions on the following lines may kindly be issued.

3. The writ petitioners who are landowners

seeking dropping of the acquisition proceedings insofar as their respective lands are concerned, on the ground that: (a) their lands are situated within green belt area; (b) they are totally built up; (c) properties wherein there are buildings constructed by charitable, educational and/or religious institutions; (d) nursery lands; (e) who have set up factories, may be permitted to make appropriate application to the BDA seeking reconsideration for exclusion of their lands from acquisition by producing documents to substantiate their contentions within one month from the date of the order.

3.1 The BDA will consider such requests

keeping in mind the status of the property as on the date of Preliminary Notification. Properties developed, improved, constructed upon, subsequent to the Preliminary Notification will not be considered for deletion.

3.2 The writ petitioners whose revenue sites

have been acquired they shall be allotted with the site of 30 ft. x 40 ft. dimension in terms of the order/direction of this Hon'ble Court dated 20-7-2001 passed in W.P. Nos.20875 to 20938 of 2001 (Anjanapura Scheme).

3.3 The writ petitioners/landowners shall make

appropriate applications within 30 days from the date of this order and thereafter the authority shall consider the applications and pass appropriate orders within period of three months.”

82. As observed hereinabove, BDA was required to

undertake the exercise of examining the claims of respective

715

parties as directed thereunder. BDA was also required to

comply with further directions and clarifications issued by the

Apex Court. In other words, it had to ascertain whether the

claim of applicants would fall within the four corners of

parameters fixed by the Division Bench as well as by the

Hon’ble Apex Court. In this direction BDA has undertaken the

mammoth exercise of conducting spot inspection, ascertaining

the age of buildings existing, if any (namely, as to whether

such buildings came up before issuance of Preliminary

Notification or after issuance thereof) and the Special Land

Acquisition Officers have submitted their reports. In fact,

some of the reports which have been filed have been also

challenged and/or attacked in these writ petitions on the

ground of they being contrary to the factual matrix. We have

already enumerated as to how some of the reports are either

being erroneous or being contrary to facts.

82.1 This Court in exercise of the writ jurisdiction under

Article 226 or in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of

Constitution of India would not be in a position to fathom the

truth or otherwise of such exercise undertaken by BDA. It

would also be necessary to note at this juncture that after

issuance of Preliminary Notification sites have been purchased

716

from the erstwhile owners. There are instances where even

prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification, revenue sites

have been purchased by few of the petitioners and they are

said to have put up constructions. There are instances where

the construction put up are in accordance with the building

plan or licence issued by Municipal Authority, Corporation or

Council, as the case may be. In fact, direction issued by the

Division Bench to BDA is to either consider for regularization

or dropping of such portions of lands/sites from acquisition,

who had purchased the same prior to issuance of Preliminary

Notification.

82.2 Some of the petitioners who have been allotted sites

in these lands, which were at one point of time notified and

subsequently denotified in the light of exercise undertaken by

virtue of order passed by Division Bench and the order

upholding acquisition with certain directions and clarification

issued by Hon’ble Apex Court, such allottees have sought for

alternate site in the very same Layout. There may be

instances where such allottees would have already constructed

building/s and have been residing in such building/s by

themselves or through their tenants or might have sold the

property and thereby third party rights having crept in. Even

717

in such circumstances, BDA cannot be heard to contend that

they would not look into those aspects or turn blind eye. In

this regard suitable direction will have to be issued.

82.3 Petitioner in W.P.No.5228/2015 has been allotted a

site bearing No.141 formed in Sy.No.17/1 of Hennur Village,

Arkavati Layout measuring East to West 15 meters and North

to South 24 meters and totally measuring 360 sq.mtrs. as

morefully described in schedule to the petition. Pursuant to

said allotment, Lease-cum-Sale agreement was executed in his

favour on 28.05.2007 (Annexure-A) and possession came to be

delivered pursuant to which Khata was mutated in his name

by the respondent-BDA on 20-06-2007 vide Annexures-B & C

respectively. Petitioner approached respondent – BDA for

approval of building plan and accordingly, it was approved and

licence was granted as per Annexures-D & E respectively. As

is evident from photographs –Annexure-F, building has been

constructed which includes residential building on the rear

side. In fact, petitioner had borrowed loan from State Bank of

India in a sum of Rs.20 lakhs for construction of the house,

which is also evident from consent letter issued by the State

Bank of India on 03.07.2008–Annexure-Q. The total

expenditure incurred for putting up construction on the said

718

site as certified by the Civil Engineer dated 11.04.2008 -

Annexure-R as well as payments made when the construction

was in progress is reflected in the statement produced at

Annexure-S and such payments were made by petitioner

through cheques.

82.4 In this factual scenario, where building has come

up in the site allotted by respondent-BDA in favour of

petitioner, he was into a surprise or shock when land in which

site had been carved out and allotted by BDA having been de-

notified. As such, for quashing of de-Notification process and

to declare that respondents-1 to 5 have no right whatsoever to

demolish the portion of petition schedule property formed in

Sy.No.17/1 of Hennur village and to declare that impugned

Final Notification dated 18.06.2014 as illegal and arbitrary,

petitioner is before this Court.

83. Though petitioner in W.P.No.5228/2015 has

sought for quashing of Final Notification dated 18.06.2014,

this court is not inclined to entertain the said prayer for

reasons more than one.

83.1 Firstly, issuance of Notification for acquiring the

lands specified under said Notification has been upheld by the

Division Bench and affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case

719

of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case. Secondly, land in which

petitioner’s site has been carved out and allotted to him by the

BDA has been de-notified in favour of the owners of land and

they not being parties to the present proceedings, as said

prayer cannot be considered.

83.2 However, the fact remains that pursuant to Final

Notification dated 21.02.2004 whereunder, an extent of 2750

acres of land was sought to be acquired for the purpose of

formation of Layout, land in question has been acquired and

sites have also been stated to be formed, pursuant to which,

allotments were made, Lease-cum-Sale Agreements were

executed, khata was mutated in the names of allottees and

tax has been collected from allottees. Further, plan submitted

by allottees for construction of buildings has also been

approved and license granted to put up construction.

However, under the guise of undertaking re-do exercise

pursuant to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, an extent of 983.12

acres have been deleted either by way of de-notifying the lands

or on account of some of land owners having approached this

court for quashing of the proceedings and having obtained

orders in their favour or said lands being deleted from

acquisition proceedings for the reasons indicated in the orders

720

passed denotifying certain land. But, fact remains that 983.12

acres have been deleted from acquisition out of 2750 acres,

which was the subject matter of Final Notification dated

21.02.2004. In the photograph which has been produced at

Annexure-F by the petitioner has been perused by this Court,

which would clearly indicate that except building of the

petitioner, surrounding lands which can be seen seems to be

more than several acres which are lying fallow and vacant and

yet same has been denotified. The circumstances in which

lands have been denotified cannot be beyond the parameters

fixed by the Division Bench as well by Hon’ble Apex Court in

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. However, on perusal of records

made available by the BDA and various reports, it would

disclose that in several cases where Special Land Acquisition

Officer has undertaken the exercise of visiting the spot along

with Revenue Inspectors has recommended for de-notifying the

lands and BDA on the ground that there is inconsistency

between the said report as well as report of the Assistant

Commissioner, has not accepted the reports of the Special

Land Acquisition Officer and thereby has not deleted or

denotified certain lands. However, intriguing circumstances

this case would unfold is the fact that large tracts of lands

721

though vacant, not developed and not falling within the

parameters fixed by the Division Bench and the Hon’ble Apex

Court has also been deleted or de-notified. It is in this

background, exercise so undertaken by the BDA requires to be

scrutinized at micro level.

84. Sri Somashekhar, learned Advocate appearing for

petitioner in W.P.No.7248/2019 would contend that in the

land bearing Sy.No.79 measuring 4 acres of Dasarahalli

village, revenue sites have been formed way back in the year

1994. He would also contend that surrounding lands have

been deleted and denotified namely, Sy.Nos,45, 75, 47 & 34

bounded East, West, North and South respectively and as

such, he is entitled to the relief as specified in paragraph 160(i)

of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case. He would also contend that

Division Bench has extended the relief to revenue site holders

and similar relief deserves to be granted to the petitioners. He

would also submit that site owners have already constructed

residential buildings and are residing therein and the fact that

betterment charges have been paid and plan having been

sanctioned by the jurisdictional Gram Panchayat would clearly

indicate that petitioners are revenue site owners and as such,

they are entitled to the relief granted by Division Bench.

722

85. Per contra, Sri K N Puttegowda, learned Advocate

appearing for respondent-BDA would support the impugned

Notifications and contends that writ petitions itself are not

maintainable since they are not filed by the aggrieved person

but by association.

85.1 Working plan insofar as P.Dasarahally village

would indicate that Sy.No.79 is bounded on North by

Sy.No.47/7 and 47/8, which have already been acquired and

on eastern side, it is bounded by Sy.No.45, which has been

acquired and Sy.No.34/1 situated on the southern side itself

was either deleted or denotified and so also, land situated on

the western side bearing Sy.No.77. Present petitions are

common writ petitions filed by the association on behalf of

members who are 28 in number and court fee has been paid

accordingly. As such, contention regarding maintainability of

writ petitions stands rejected.

85.2 Petitioners have contended that they have put up

construction over the sites allotted to them except sporadic

construction put up in different plots. It cannot be conclusively

held that on the basis of documents made available, that in

the sites purchased by the petitioners are fully built.

723


the petitioners in W.P.No.37478/2017 & W.P.No.37480/2017

that sites have been formed by the erstwhile owners in the

land bearing Sy.No.104/6 situated at Rachenahalli Village,

K.R.Puram Hobli, after duly converted from agricultural

purposes to non-agriculture residential purposes way back on

23.04.1992 as per Annexure-B and they are in possession and

enjoyment of the said sites and they have obtained khata from

jurisdictional municipal authorities. It is also contended that

even BBMP has issued khata and collected taxes for the year

2017-18. He would submit that there was an agreement

entered into between the erstwhile land owners and the Post

and Telecommunication Department’s Employees Co-operative

Housing Society Ltd and pursuant to same, Layout was formed

and sites have allotted/sold in favour of its members like the

petitioners and authorities having considered the said

representations of the society, as well as representations

submitted by the petitioners for de-notifying the said lands, as

it would pass the test prescribed under the directions issued

by the Division Bench, as clarified and directed by the Hon’ble

Apex Court in the BONDU RAMASWAMY's case and yet, steps

having not been taken by the BDA. They have prayed for

724

quashing the Preliminary and Final Notification insofar as

petitioners’ sites are concerned.

86.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned counsel

appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3-BDA would submit that

petitioners are not notified khatedars and they were not

parties to the earlier writ petition and they have not filed any

application seeking for re-conveying the sites they had

purchased. As such question of considering their claim at this

length of time, does not arise.

86.2 However, it is required to be noticed that in the

statement of objections filed on behalf of BDA insofar as

petitioners in W.P.Nos.37478/2017 & 37480/2017 are

concerned, is not only vague but also bereft of any particulars

whatsoever. General and omnibus statements have been made

in paragraph-11 of its statement of objections by denying the

fact that lands surrounding Sy.No.104/6 having been left out

from acquisition is not true. It is stated that petitioners’ land

does not come within the guidelines issued by the Division

Bench of this Court.

86.3 Averments made in paragraph-10 to 16 of the

statement of objections filed by BDA are generic in nature,

without any particulars, insofar as, Sy.No.104/6 except to the

725

extent stated in paragraph-11. It is very intriguing to notice

that in W.P.No.37478/2017, two sets of statement of

objections have been filed. One by the present counsel,

Sri.Sachin B.S. (filed on 29.06.2018) and other one filed by

Smt.A.D.Vijaya, previous counsel (filed on 16.07.2018). In

paragraph-8 of the statement of objections filed by Smt.

A.D.Vijaya, it is stated that request of the petitioner has been

considered and rejected by the Government. It is also admitted

that compensation amount has not been deposited on account

of pendency of the litigations. This itself would indicate as to

the manner in which the matters pending before Courts are

dealt with by the BDA. Even minimum requisite details which

requires to be considered on facts of each case has not been

furnished by the BDA. This would only indicate the

lackadaisical approach of the BDA in dealing with the cases

pending before the Court and also a mirror to the pedantic

approach which BDA adopts, which obviously for the reasons

to keep the litigations pending before the Courts and to ensure

that there is no end to such litigations.

86.4 These matters require to be examined from several

angles namely, the aspirants for sites who have applied with

the BDA and having been waiting eagerly for such allotments

726

from long number of years with a fond hope that they would be

able to construct a roof over their head and they have been

pursuing their claim by submitting application in attempts

and in some cases it can be seen applicants have made more

than ten attempts. Yet, they have not received any allotment

letters from BDA. On the other hand, certain land owners, site

owners including the owners of sites who have been allotted

sites by Housing Co-operative Society like PNT Employees

Housing Societies, Income Tax Department Employees’

Housing Society, Telecommunications Employees’ Housing

Society, Income Tax Department Officer’s Association and the

like and who have purchased such sites, have already put up

construction in the said sites and have been residing in the

said houses, have also knocked the doors of this Court and

running from pillar to post to save their valuable property.

Judgment of the Division Bench as well as judgment of Hon’ble

Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case having come as a

succor to their vows has also not come to their rescue, as

observed herein above, either on account of non consideration

of their representation by the BDA or consideration of the

representation as an eye wash and rejecting it or non

consideration of the application with reference to the factual

727

matrix or not considering the application for denotifying as

having been built up as observed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case vide paragraph-

160(i)(ii) and this has resulted in several unwarranted

litigations and present litigations are such. In fact, in order to

put an end to all these litigations and to resolve the issue in a

transparent manner and to ensure that directions issued by

the Division Bench of this Court and further directions and

clarifications issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court, BDA was

directed to make their stand clear by explaining as to how they

propose to deal with these aspects referred to above and this

Court was expecting a positive stand from the BDA.

Unfortunately, in its usual rigmarole stand which it takes

before Courts, BDA has filed an affidavit through its

Commissioner on 12.06.2019 that too only when learned AGA

intervened in the matter and assured this Court such an

affidavit would be filed. It is stated in paragraph-4 of the

affidavit that there are 2608 revenue sites holders who have

approached the BDA by filing an application for regularization

of their sites or for payment of compensation or to give

alternate sites. However, stand of the BDA in respect of

revenue site holders is that those who have purchased sites

728

prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification would be governed

by the resolution dated 18.04.2017 passed by BDA for

regularization of their sites and in such cases, it has been

resolved that where BDA utilized revenue sites for formation of

layout and road, allotment would be made as per the

resolution dated 09.06.2017 namely, in terms of directions

issued in the case of JUNJAMMA AND OTHERS vs. THE

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY reported in ILR

2005 KAR 608 (for short "JUNJAMMA's case") alternative sites

to the revenue site holders would be given. They have also

enclosed resolution dated 18.04.2017 and 09.06.2017

forwarded to the appropriate Government for approval of its

resolutions. As noticed hereinabove, appropriate Government

is also dragging its feet not taking its stand either way, it

would only indicate that sufferings of the individual site

owners or land holders or prospective site allottees rights are

being put into jeopardy on account of attitude adopted by BDA

as well as appropriate Government. In fact, it would not have

been difficult for BDA to place on record with reference to each

of the writ petitions as to whether their claim would fall in any

of the category or conditions stipulated in judgment of Division

Bench or BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case as stated supra. If so,

729

the manner in which such consideration has taken place or

had been considered by the BDA or the net result of such

consideration. As noticed hereinabove the BDA seems too

eager and anxious to withhold such details or information from

being made available to the Court. Neither the statement of

objections filed nor affidavit of the Commissioner dated

12.06.2019 would disclose as to mode, manner and method in

which the representation of these two writ petitioners came to

be considered, dealt with and decided.

86.5 However, optimistic view of this Court has been

shattered on perusal of the affidavit filed by the Commissioner

of BDA, inasmuch as, said affidavit contains no particulars

regarding the manner in which BDA proposes to deal in

respect of different categories of applicants as ordered by

Division Bench and clarified by Apex Court. It is as bald as

baldness could be or as vague as vagueness could be. In fact,

BDA attempted to shirk from its responsibility by shifting the

responsibility on the Government and the communication

dated 18.04.2017 to 07.06.2019 would act as mirror to this

fact. In fact as to what steps BDA has taken subsequent to

the resolution dated 18.04.2017 till 18.03.2019, the affidavit is

silent. This would only indicate that when the matters are

730

taken up by the Courts, BDA has made attempts to show that

it has woken from its slumber and contend before the Court

that it is discharging its statutory obligation, which is not so,

inasmuch as, for past two years i.e., from 18.04.2017 to

18.03.2019, there seems to be no correspondence between the

Government and BDA. Though Government is party to all

these writ petitions, it is also dragging its feet and thereby,

resulting in rights of the parties being put into jeopardy i.e.,

rights of both sets of parties. This has to be necessarily termed

as colourable exercise of powers by the instrumentality of the

State like BDA.

87. On perusal of case papers relating to

W.P.No.57992/2015 it would disclose that after disposal of the

matter before the Division Bench, an affidavit came to be filed

by the petitioner and his brothers on 03.02.2017 declaring

that they own the property jointly. However, this petition has

been filed by one of the brothers and other co-owners are not

arrayed as parties to this petition. Records would also disclose

that undisputedly, Sy.No.118 which is on the northern side of

land in question was not notified for acquisition. So also,

Sy.No.115 situated on the western side. Taking this into

consideration, land bearing Sy.No.116 on the western side has

731

been deleted and land bearing Sy.No.94 situated on eastern

side is also deleted. This would only indicate that respondent-

BDA in terms of the directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in

BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, while undertaking exercise of re-

doing has dropped Sy.Nos.116 and 94 from the acquisition

proceedings. No reasons are forthcoming from the statement

of objections filed by respondent-BDA as to how land in

question would not form an isolated pocket or in other words,

as to why acquisition in respect of this isolated pocket

deserves to be continued. Representation dated 26.11.2013

(Annexure-E) has not been considered and disposed of by BDA

and there is no reference to the same in the statement of

objections filed.

87.1 Having regard to the facts obtained in

W.P.No.5276/2014, it is noticed that land bearing

Sy.No.13/34 measuring 22 guntas of Jakkur Village,

Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, is surrounded by

Sy.No.13/2 on the northern side, Sy.No.13/4 to the East,

Sy.No. 11/10 to the West and Sy.No.13/3B to the South,

which lands have been deleted. After BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

case cited supra, while undertaking the exercise of re-doing

the whole process, the land in question alone is sought to be

732

acquired, which prima-facie would fall within the parameters

of paragraph 160(ii) of the directions issued by Hon’ble Apex

Court.

87.2 As to whether exercise undertaken by the BDA in

deleting adjacent lands Sy.Nos.13/2, 13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B

itself is in serious doubt.

87.3 While narrating the facts of respective writ petitions

hereinabove, it has already been noticed that thrust of

arguments of the land owners relate to non implementation of

the order of Division Bench as well as Apex Court, which can

be summarized as:

(a) Though adjacent lands have been denotified,

lands belonging to the writ petitioners have not

been denotified or dropped from the acquisition

proceedings;

(b) Claim made by the petitioners for deleting their

lands on the ground of lands in the vicinity have

been developed and as such those lands have

been deleted, was not considered by BDA.

Hence, petitioners have sought for deletion of their lands.

There is prima facie justification in such claims. However, at

the same time, it has to be noticed by this Court that

subsequent to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and under the

733

guise of implementing the said order, reports have been

furnished by the Land Acquisition Officer and by using pick

and choose method certain lands have been deleted from

acquisition either on the ground that it is built up or it is

landlocked, which is factually otherwise. This view of the

Court gets fortified from the following facts:

(i) In W.P.No.48880/2014 the petitioner therein

is claiming for deletion of 0.54 guntas of land

in Sy.No.85/3 of Amruthahalli Village,

Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk,

contending the lands on all the three sides

namely, lands situated in Sy.No.86, 84 and

115 on the northern, eastern and southern

side of Sy.No.85/3 has been deleted. The

working plan of Amruthahalli Village

produced by the BDA indicated that on all

the three sides of Sy.No.85/3 the lands have

not been acquired for Arkavathi Layout. In

the endorsement issued to the petitioner

therein it does not even disclose that the

exercise that has been undertaken by the

BDA was in pursuance to BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case.

(ii) Even in respect of Sy.No.103/3 and 103/4

which is the subject matter of

W.P.Nos.47823-824/2015 the lands

surrounded on eastern, western, northern

734

and southern side bearing no.103/5, 102/2,

103/2, 102/5 are either not the subject

matter of acquisition or it has been deleted.

(iii) Even in respect of property bearing

Sy.No.13/3A measuring 22 guntas situated

at Jakkur Village, Yelahanka Hobli, which is

surrounded by lands bearing Sy.No.13/2,

13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B have not been

notified for acquisition at all.

(iv) Insofar as land measuring 18 guntas

situated in Sy.No.81/3B of Rachenahalli

Village, K R Puram Hobli, Bangalore East

Taluk, which is the subject matter of

W.P.Nos.54358-59/2014 is concerned,

which is sought for being deleted on the

ground of adjacent lands having been

deleted when examined with reference to the

records, it would disclose that above said 18

guntas of land is bounded on East by

Sy.Nos.81/2A and 81/2B, West by halla and

Sy.Nos.82, 83/1, north by Sy.Nos.81/3B

and 84/2 and south by Sy.No.81/3A. These

three (3) lands have been notified for

acquisition.

88. Even according to BDA subsequent to FFN dated

23.02.2004 and prior to issuance of modified Notification

dated 18.06.2014, about 988 acres of land has been denotified

for which acceptable and justifiable reasons are lacking. To

735

put it differently, facts discussed hereinabove is contrary to the

stand of BDA.

89. In the light of aforestated facts, this Court is of the

considered view that these aspects will have to be dealt by

examining the claims afresh and for ensuring there is clear

and absolute transparency in the said process, it would be apt

and appropriate to constitute a Committee. The Committee is

accordingly constituted comprising of following three (3)

persons to look into the various aspects as indicated in the

order hereinabove and as also morefully indicated in the

operative portion of this order. The Committee shall comprise

of the following persons:

(1) Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana, Former Judge-High Court of Karnataka No.10/11, Manasa,

Singapore Gardens, Green Fields-1, Gubbilala Gate, Kanakapura Road, Bengaluru - 560 062 - - CHAIRMAN

(2) Sri.Sandeep Dave, IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Chief Secretary

#N-73, Diamond District, Old Airport Road, Bengaluru-560 008 - - MEMBER

(3) Sri.N.S.Megharikh, IPS (Retd.)

Former Director General of Police-CID,

Economic Offences and Special Units Government of Karnataka #A-33, Legacy ESTILO, Doddaballapur Road,

736

Avalahalli, Yelahanka, Bengaluru - 560 064 - - MEMBER

90. The Commissioner-BDA shall be the Ex-Officio

Convener. This Court directs the Commissioner-BDA to

consult the Chairman and its Members of the Committee

and accordingly fix and pay the remunerations. BDA is

directed to provide the necessary assistance, transport

and other logistical support to the Chairman and

Members of the Committee for holding the meetings. The

Chairman of the Committee is authorized to appoint

requisite staff, if need be, on temporary basis to assist the

Committee in conducting the meetings and also fix their

salaries, which shall be paid by the BDA. The BDA is also

directed to provide necessary office space at its Head

Office for smooth functioning of the Committee within an

outer limit of three (3) weeks from today. The Committee

would be at liberty to take requisite assistance of any of

the employees of the BDA or the State Government

including Surveyors either from BDA or of the State

Government for the purposes of carrying out spot

inspection, marking, inspection, etc and for overall

implementation of this order.

737

91. For the reasons aforestated, I proceed to pass the

following:

ORDER

(i) The challenge made to the Notifications Nos.

BDA/COMMR, KLAO/LA9/104/2002-03,

BANGALORE, dated: 03.02.2003, No. UDD 193

MNX 2004, BANGALORE, dated: 23.02.2004

and No. UDD 426 MNJ/2011, BANGALORE,

dated 18.06.2014, stands rejected and

acquisition of the lands for the formation of

Arkavati Layout is upheld.

(ii) W.P.Nos.815/2016 c/w 6717/2016 is allowed

and writ of mandamus issues to the BDA –

respondent No.1 to conclude the allotment

process of site No.BK90, Arkavati Layout,

expeditiously, at any rate within an outer limit of

three months from the date of receipt of this

order. In the alternate, if site BK90 is not

available BDA shall allot alternate site and

execute Lease-cum-Sale Agreement in favour of

the petitioner, issue Possession Certificate and

deliver vacant possession of site so allotted,

738

expeditiously and at any rate within 30 days from

the date of issuing the endorsement to the

petitioner that site bearing No.BK90 not being

available. It is also made clear that within 7 days

from the date of this order, BDA shall intimate

petitioner as to whether site No.BK90 allotted to

him on 31.05.2016, is available or not.

(iii) W.P.Nos.47461/2016 & 48412-14/2016 are

hereby dismissed.

(iv) W.P.No.21361/2017 is allowed and writ of

mandamus issues to BDA directing the said

Authority to execute absolute sale deed in favour

of the petitioner expeditiously at any rate within

an outer limit of three (3) months from the date of

receipt of this order.

(v) W.P.No.751/2016 is allowed and writ of

mandamus issues to the BDA to allot a site

measuring 30’ x 40’ in favour of petitioner

expeditiously at any rate within an outer limit of

three (3) months from the date of receipt of this

order.

739

(vi) W.P.Nos.3178/2017 c/w 55737/2016,

10923/2015, 58734/2016, 15588/2017,

14868/2017, 30485/2017 & 59317/2016 and

similarly placed writ petitions stands disposed of

by directing the BDA to place the representations

of all the applicants/petitioners submitted for

allotment of sites for being considered by the

Committee constituted hereinabove. It is also

made clear that all such applications which have

been filed for allotment of sites under any of the

categories specified in the order of the Division

Bench or the Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case shall be considered by the

Committee keeping in mind the directions issued

thereunder and subject to order passed at

paragraph (xiv) hereinbelow.

(vii) W.P.No.43194/2017 is hereby allowed in part

and a writ of mandamus issues to the BDA to

allot one (1) site in favour of the petitioner, the

measurement of which shall be same as indicated

in the Lease cum Sale Agreement executed in

favour of petitioner by BDA on 28.02.2007.

740

(viii) W.P.Nos.38463/2014, 19783-784/2018,

46766/2014, 47606/2014 & 48579/2014,

stands dismissed.

(ix) W.P.No.1876/2016 stands disposed of and BDA

is directed to place the representation of the

petitioner, who is a revenue site holder and all

similar representations/applications of the

revenue site holders before the Committee for

examining their claims in the background of

Division Bench judgment as affirmed by Apex

Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and as

undertaken in paragraph No.3.2 of the Memo

filed by the BDA before the Division Bench.

(x) W.P.No.29541/2015 is allowed in part and a writ

of mandamus issues to the BDA to execute the

Lease cum Sale Agreement in favour of the

petitioners in respect of site Nos.B9-SC-2201 and

B5-SF-2137, which sites have been allotted as

per allotment letters dated 09.11.2007

(Annexures-R2 and R3 respectively).

(xi) The applicants/writ petitioners who are claiming

relief based on sale transactions which has taken

741

place subsequent to issuance of Preliminary

Notification dated 03.02.2003, would not be

entitled to any protection or relief whatsoever and

their claim stands rejected.

(xii) It is also made clear that neither the Committee

nor the BDA would be required to examine or

consider the claim where dispute with regard to

title is involved.

(xiii) The BDA shall allot the site to all such applicants

in whose favour allotment had been made and

later cancelled on the ground of same site having

been allotted to two (2) persons or cancelled for

whatsoever reason like it has fallen in the land

deleted from acquisition and like reasons.

(xiv) All deletions or deNotification recommended by

the BDA or made by BDA or by the Government,

is subject to the certification or approval by the

Committee to the effect that such deletion of land

is in accordance with the law laid down by the

Division Bench and directions/clarifications

issued by the Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case.

742

(xv) It is also made clear that in the event of

applications or representations having not been

submitted by the applicant/s pursuant to the

order of the Division Bench or BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case, they would be at liberty to

submit the same to the BDA within one (1) month

from the date of this order and on receipt of said

representations or applications, it shall be placed

by the BDA before the Committee constituted

hereinabove within ten (10) days after expiry of

one (1) month.

(xvi) The civic amenities sites earmarked in the map/s

or Arkavati Layout Plans, if located as an isolated

plot or island and such plots if not being adjacent

or abutting to the sites formed in Arkavati

Layout, such lands may not be feasible for

acquisition and Committee would examine such

claims and based on physical verification and a

report shall be forwarded by the Committee to

BDA either to retain such lands for acquisition or

recommend for deletion as the case may be, upon

743

receipt of such report BDA shall take further

steps.

(xvii) A writ of mandamus issues to BDA to execute

Lease cum Sale Agreement and possession

certificate in favour of all such allottees, who had

been allotted sites and on account of pendency of

the present proceedings, further steps had not

been taken. The BDA shall also ensure that

katha of the sites so allotted and possession

delivered is issued in favour of such allottees. The

said exercise shall be undertaken by the BDA

forthwith and at any rate within an outer limit of

three (3) months from today.

(xviii) The BDA shall consider the claim of all such

allottees, who have been allotted site/s in

Arkavati Layout, but later cancelled due to redo

exercise and shall allot the site/s to such of those

applicants/allottees expeditiously and at any rate

within an outer limit of three (3) months from the

date of receipt of copy of this order and it is also

made clear that in the event of such site/s not

being available in Arkavati Layout, they shall be

744

allotted sites in any other Layout within the

timeframe stipulated hereinabove.

(xix) Registered agreement holders or agreement

holders together holding registered General Power

of Attorney namely, if such documents have come

into existence contemporaneously prior to

issuance of Preliminary Notification dated

03.02.2003, would be entitled to seek for

allotment of site from BDA and all such

applicants would be at liberty to submit

application/representations to BDA within one

(1) month from today and all such

representations received by the BDA shall be

placed before the Committee constituted by this

Court within ten (10) days after expirty of one (1)

month and on report being submitted by the

Committee, BDA would be at liberty to make

allotment of sites or issue endorsement assigning

the reasons for rejection of claim, if any.

(xx) The Committee constituted hereinabove shall

implement the order passed in

W.A.No.2624/2005 & connected matters on

745

25.11.2005 in the matter of THE

COMMISSIONER, BDA AND OTHERS vs. STATE

OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY AND

OTHERS and order passed by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4097/2010

and connected matters on 05.05.2010 in the

matter of BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHERS

vs. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS

and in addition to the same, said Committee

shall also:

(a) Examine all such representations

received by BDA pursuant to Division

Bench order and BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s judgment placed before

the Committee and submit a report to

the BDA as to whether such claim/s

would fall within the exceptions carved

out under the judgments for deleting the

lands or not. The BDA shall thereafter

take steps to delete or include such

lands from acquisition.

746

(b) The Committee shall also consider the

representations of the land owners

submitted to BDA which shall be placed

before the Committee to ascertain as to

whether the lands of the applicants are

landlocked and/or adjacent lands

having been dropped from acquisition

without dropping the lands of the

applicants. The Committee shall

examine the claim on case to case basis

and on being satisfied either such claim

being genuine or being contrary to

factual scenario shall prepare a report

village wise and forward the same to the

BDA to enable the said authority to

either delete such lands from acquisition

or conclude the acquisition.

(c) The Committee shall either by itself or

through its empowered officers carryout

inspection of all 16 villages where sites

have been carved in Arkavati Layout by

identifying such sites in respect of which

747

allotment letters, possession certificate

has been issued and recommend to the

BDA to handover possession of such

sites to the allottees forthwith for

ensuring the process of allotment is

taken to its logical end by forwarding a

report in that regard to the BDA

expeditiously and preferably within a

period of four (4) months today. On

receipt of such report from the

Committee, BDA shall expeditiously and

not later than one (1) month from the

date of receipt of such report shall

execute the Lease cum Sale Agreement

or absolute Sale Deed, as the case may

be, by confirming possession of such

sites having been handed over or

delivered to the allottees.

(d) The Committee shall examine as to

whether the claim of land owners for

deleting their lands from being acquired

is within the parameters or the

748

directions issued by the Division Bench

and the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case and if so, shall

submit a report to the BDA to the said

effect and pursuant to the same BDA

shall take steps accordingly to either

delete the land or proceed with allotment

of the sites to the applicants that may be

formed in such lands.

(e) The Committee shall examine as to

whether deletion of land/s from

acquisition made by the BDA is within

the parameters fixed by Division Bench

and BONDU RAMASWAMY's case by

examining every such deletion made on

case to case basis and particularly with

reference to deletion made on the

ground of adjacent lands having been

deleted.

(f) The Committee shall also examine the

claim of the applicants on case to case

basis for deletion of lands on the ground

749

of area being built-up by considering or

looking into the scientific evidence that

may be secured by the Committee as

noticed hereinabove.

(g) The Committee shall examine the claim

of the applicants on case to case basis

for deletion of lands from acquisition on

the ground of buildings having been

constructed by ascertaining as to

whether such buildings have come up

prior to the Preliminary Notification

dated 03.02.2003 or thereafter. It is

made clear that such buildings/sheds

constructed with asbestos sheets or tiled

roof, shall not be eligible to be

considered as a pucca building for the

purposes of exclusion from acquisition

even if so claimed by the applicants.

(h) The Committee shall examine as to

whether deletion of 983.12 acres of land

by the Government subsequent to the

Notification dated 23.02.2004 and before

750

issuance of Notification dated

18.06.2014 was in accordance of dicta

laid down by the Division Bench and in

compliance with directions/clarifications

issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU

RAMASWAMY’s case and submit a

report to the BDA, who shall take steps

based on said report.

(i) The Committee shall also examine the

applications of revenue site holders for

allotment of sites in accordance with the

extant Circular of BDA dated

09.06.2017 and Resolution dated

18.04.2017 keeping in mind the law laid

down in JUNJAMMA’s case and also

keeping in mind paragraph 3.2 of the

memo filed before the Division Bench

whereunder BDA has undertaken to

allot a site measuring 30' X 40' in favour

of revenue site holders, whose revenue

sites had been acquired, which would be

in terms of the order/direction issued in

751

W.P.Nos.20875-938/2001 dated

20.07.2021 (Anjanapura Scheme).

(j) The Committee shall examine as to

whether on Layout/s formed by Housing

Co-operative Societies or House Building

Co-operative Societies or registered

Union or registered Association wherein

sites have been formed and allotted to

its Members wherein construction of

buildings have come up by conducting

spot inspection either by itself or

through its empowered officers and if

the Committee is of the view that it is a

self contained Layout, a report to said

effect shall be submitted to BDA, upon

which BDA shall delete the said lands

from acquisition. However, it is made

clear that if BDA has taken possession

of such lands and has already formed

sites, allotment made, then claim of the

Members of the Co-operative Society for

allotment of alternate site would only be

752

considered by the BDA and it is made

clear that said benefit would be available

only to the applicants or Members of the

Society/Union/Association, who have

purchased the property under registered

sale deed from such Housing Co-

operative Society or House Building Co-

operative Society or Registered Union or

Registered Association, as the case may

be.

(k) The BDA shall publish the operative

portion of this order in any two (2)

vernacular newspapers consecutively on

two (2) dates within a gap of 10 days

from today, so as to avoid issuance of

individual notices by the Committee and

it is made clear that there would be no

need or necessity to issue individual

notices by the Committee.

(l) The Committee would at liberty to

examine as to whether BDA has

undertaken any exercise to delete lands

753

suo motu and if it is so found, the

exercise so undertaken by BDA would

stand quashed if it is not in conformity

with the order passed by the Division

Bench as affirmed and clarified by the

Apex Court, to which effect the

Committee shall submit a report to BDA

and on such report being submitted, the

deleted lands would stand restored to

BDA for the purposes of formation of

sites in Arkavati Layout to be allotted to

the applicants in waiting.

(xxi) All lands which are the subject matter of

acquisition for the purpose of Arkavati Layout if

having been converted, layout formed, sites

carved and constructions having been put-up

prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification dated

03.02.2003, would be entitled for deletion from

acquisition, subject to report being submitted by

the Committee to the said effect.

(xxii) All writ petitions which have not been specifically

dealt with hereinabove is deemed to have been

754

disposed of in terms of the above order and all

pending interlocutory applications stands

consigned to records.

(xxiii) No order as to costs.

SD/- JUDGE

*sp/DR

Documents

WP 51929.2014 and connected matters