View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
XIAN: A large array of telescopes in Antarctica dedicated to transient science with “all-sky” imaging every 5 seconds
US: Donald G. York (Chicago), Lifan Wang (LBL), Carl Pennypacker
(SSL), Morley Blouke (Ball Aerospace), Don Lamb (Chicago), Doyal Harper(Chicago), Dale Sandford(Chicago), Julie Thorburn (Chicago)
China:Xiangqun Cui (NAIOT), Xu Zhou (CAS, Beijing), Jingyao Hu (CAS, Beijing),
Xiangyan Yuan (NAIOT)
Europe:Enrico Cappellaro, (INAF, Padova),
Roger Malina (LAM, France), Stephane Basa (LAM, France)
AustraliaJohn Storey (UNSW), J. Lawrence (UNSW), Michael Ashley
(UNSW),
XIAN Prime Science GoalGamma Ray Burst detection and follow up science
• 20th mag detections in 5-10 seconds (V, R)• Detect 25-50% GRBS in sky covered
– .3 GRB/day– > 100/day orphan afterglows/day– 0.1/day SN « blue flashes », 2000SN/yr
Follow up for GRB physics, use as cosmological probes, study high z host galaxy chemistry
• GLAST and SVOM space mission timeframes– SVOM is Sino-French Space Mission for GRB– Previously known as ECLAIRS
SVOM
• Sino-French GRB satellite (ex ECLAIRS)• Currently in CNES Phase A study for 2011 launch.• Chinese: NAOC ( Beijing), IHEP (Beiking), XIOPM
(Xian)– Jianyan Wei (PI), Shuang Nan Zhang (Co-PI),
Jingyao Hu, Qiu Yulei, Shouchen Li• French: CEA ( J Paul PI), CESR D Barret.. J L
Atteia, ....Klotz,Casse, Daigne....• S.Basa (LAM) co-pi visible camera, ground based
follow up• CESR, LATT, IAP, APC• ISF Milan, TIFR Mumbai, MIT
XIAN Science Goals• Light curves from v short t (~5s) to 4 months --GRBs, with coincident optical/GRB (& X-ray)
for cosmic distance scale --Orphan afterglows (GRB opening angle) --Type II blue flash, early time Type Ia curves --Type II counts at low z --GRB and host physics (circumstellar lines,
clumpy?) • Deep optical survey (much deeper than SDSS)• “Calibration” of gravitational wave events
(shortest bursts) LIGO,LISA and neutrino bursts (ICE CUBE, ANTARES)
• Gravitational Lens planet searches
Xian Strawman under study• 8000 sq. deg., 400 scopes, each 5x5 deg• 0.5 meter, (clear aperture) Schmidts• • 16 K x 16 K pixels, segments 1 K x 4 K (so, 16x4
small devices per focal plane), 10 readouts per segment.
• Reduce sky coverage by x 2 , option under study– provide 2 Telescope coverage of each 5x5 deg area, – to minimize false positives – Redundancy
• Mag. Limit: 20 R effective, but broad band• Single filter, each year (to test trigger schemes)
The need for Xian as dedicated ground based array for transient
science• Once the flash is detected, follow-up is currently intermittent (less than 1%GRBS) owing to
--Lack of acceptable weather at a properly equipped site
--Lack of a system to allow overriding on-going programs
--Lack of a system into which all new observations are reported
--The impossibility of getting complete light curves.
.
The Need for Xian•Light curves are not well known --Some objects die out and recover
-- Short bursts (< 2 sec bursts) have a long tail with the same energy in it as the short spike.
--Physics of events as Zs are determined short bursts=merging, condensed matter stars long bursts =collapsing stars-SNe II)
-- GRB science drives need for dedicated facility ( cf early days of SN science)
XIAN Roadmap• Test-beds • T2 -- Test array at APO. Under development.
• T5-- Expanded array, 2+3 in SW-USA
• Deployment• T3 -- Test array of 3-5, identical telescopes.
Antarctica. Compelling stand alone science.
• Xian -- Large array of small telescopes. Antarctica
• Big Telescope (BT)--Dedicated, on site , 2.5m NIR robotic telescope for spectroscopy,photometry
Triggers for Transients
--Short frame comparisons for triggers (little changes in sky, CCD artifacts, etc. over 5-10 sec)
--Mask known stars and asteroids (masking depends on brightness)
--Use SDSS (T2, T5 in the North) or Mt Stromlo Survey (T3, Xian in the South) for quiescent sources until we have our own from averaging one season’s worth of data.
--Co-add in, e.g., 100s, 3000s, 10 hr, 100hr., 1000 hr., images to look for triggers for longer time scales (orphan afterglows, SN Ia or AGNs).Full reductions for these.
Data (per telescope)
--52 megabtyes/sec for the triggers
--2 Terabytes per night, short term storage
--4 Terabytes long term storage (will increase as storage becomes cheaper)
source sec) Vlim
GRB(>2s) 2-200 0.02 -rays
GRB a. glow 200-105 0.01 20-23
Orphan 104-105 >2 23
Blue flash-r 600 0.0005 18 ( z=0.03)
Blue flash-b 60 0.0005 21.6
Type Ia SNe 106 2.2 23 (z=0.3)
Type II SNe 106 0.1 23 (z=0.1)
Strong Grav.
Lens (QSO)
105.6 0.01 22
AGN 106 20 21
AM CVn 600 0.001 19
Cataclysmic Variables
1800 0.05 17.5
Planet eclipse 3600 0.01 13 (rocky
Planets)
*No. per Sq. degreePer year
365 per year, all-sky,==> = 0.01
VARIABLESOF INTEREST
Figures of merit
System FOV sec h* Vlim
SDSS-SNe 4 1.5 ~106 0.2 22Deep Lens 4 0.5 1300 0.16 24ROTSE III 3.5 4 1800 1.7 17.5
T2 20 2 30 2 20.4T3 60 2 10 6 20
Xian 4000 2 10 1200 20Tombo 10000 4 60 4000 17
10000 60 60 5000 12
*[h] = sq.deg.- yr, the no. of sq. deg. constantly covered for timescales, , in a year
KS-Technical Desiderata-1
• Maximum coverage at Dome C/A --Circumpolar sky is large, excellent
observing efficiency, cold• No moving parts: natural focus, one filter, no telescope motion, no(?) CCD Dewars• Trade off CCD block size design (t min) with
acceptable yield on amplifiers• Single pixel triggers, drift scan• Magnitude limit in selected time• Low power because fuel is expensive
For better image quality, adopt two correcting Schmidt plates (achromatic Schmidt)
Fig.3 Layout of the achromatic Schmidt telescope
Spot diagram
for Antarctica
The above simulation shows the focal length changed 0.02mm from 20°C to
–50.8 °C; the best image plane changed 3microns.
The image quality only slightly changed in geo diameter (encircled energy 100%).
Design of the telescopes
FOV 5x5 degrees, 20 sq. degrees
0.5 meter Schmidt
1 arcsec per pixel (9 micron pixel)
80% encircled energy in 1 pixel
3860A to 9000A
26% obscuration
f/3.28
Focus independent of temperature
dx 2000+/-2000
dy 0+/-100
8 modules8k pixels
4 modules across, 16,000 pixels across
10, 100x4000 TDI arrays per module dx 2000+/-2000
dy 0+/-100
8 modules8k pixels
4 modules across, 16,000 pixels across
10, 100x4000 TDI arrays per module
CCD layout (16,000 x 8,000 pixels)--x and y scales differ
CCD Design
QE > 50% (red favored?)Read noise < 2 electrons, rms (on chip, variable gain)Integration time 5-10s, drift scanPixel size 9-10 micronsWell capacity <0.99995 electronsDark current < 0.1 electrons per secSerial registers per unit: up to 131 unit: 1000x4000 pixels 64 units per focal plane16K x 16K pixelsPower dissipation per focal plane 16W
KS-Technical Desiderata-2• Minimize computing goals, evolve as
technology evolves -- t(short) to t(short) comparisons -- Send triggers to separate pipeline for evaluation, pull out that track of triggered object to get long timescale information -- Co add and compare for longer time scales -- Discard most frames after co-add’s are done (consider look-back requirements)
KS-Technical Desiderata-3• Follow-up maximal number of selected
classes of bursts with on-site, conventional, well equipped telescope, sized to science:
• 2.5m class, rapid response (IRAIT .8m)• --spectra, IR, optical (for redshifts to 10) --photometry (optical, IR) --polarimetry --autoalert, fast tracking• This is called BT (Big Telescope).
• Test of engineering and of science goals• 10-100 sq. deg. (2-5 telescopes, underfill focal plane with CCDs if need be.)• Self-reliant science goals (does not depend on KS): --Minimum set of orphan afterglows --Minimum set of blue bursts, SN II --Confirmation of SN II /SN Ia rate at low z (z~0.3). --Deep co-added survey (SDSS imaging equivalent)
T2,T3, T5
T2,T3, T5 -Engineering
--software for triggers (identify sources of false positives)
--test triggering schemes (different filters each year)
--recognition of triggers early enough to get correct follow-up (spectra photometry)
--Dewarless CCDs, focus by design
Examples of false positives
--variable detector artifacts--solar system, atmospheric events--saturated stars --stars that make “dipoles” because of variable PSFs when comparing frames-- radiation hits (cosmic rays or gamma rays from equipment near the CCDs)--ghosts from Schmidt systems (which move as strip scans) (need AR coatings)--true variable sources (CVs, etc.)--slow moving asteroids (put half of telescopes at different sites and use triangulation of asteroids in co-pointed fields.)--Earth orbiting satellites
ConclusionsThe 16Kx 16K CCDs are feasible to build. Low power electronics is a major development.
The minimum-moving-parts goal is attainable on paper
Previous experience to build on, but a large step is needed.
Fast algorithms will be a major challenge
T2, T3, T5 are logical first steps
Xian is feasible and should be built
Xian will impact the study of cosmology, supernova physics, variable stars, gravitational waves and neutrino astronomy
SVOM • Sino-French GRB satellite• Currently in CNES Phase A study for 2011
launch.• Chinese: NAOC ( Beijing), IHEP (Beiking),
XIOPM (Xian)– Jianyan Wei (PI), Shuang Nan Zhang
(Co-PI)• French: CEA ( J Paul PI), • S.Basa (LAM) co-pi visible camera, ground
based follow up• CESR, LATT, IAP, APC• ISF Milan, TIFR Mumbai, MIT
SVOM High Energy Instruments
FOV Energy Range Pos
CXG 2 sr 4-300 kev 10 arcmin
SXC 2 sr 1-12 kev 30 arcsec
GRM 6.2 sr .02 -5 Mev NA
Expected GRB rate: 100/yr
SVOM• Trigger on 200GRB’s per year• X, Gamma, Visible on satellite• Location in <10 sec to <10 arc min
– 50% of the cases <1 arc min for ground follow up
• Allow for 75% cases red shift and spectroscopy follow up
• On board visible cameras under study– WAC V 40 degx 40 deg 15 mag in 10 sec– VIRT K 10arc min x 10 20 mag in 300 sec– Observe « prompt » emission before and after GRB
Requirements for SVOM Ground Based Follow up
Telescope• Provide link to 8m class telescopes
• Visible to NIR for high z GRB
• Positions to 1 arc sec within 5 min
• Lightcurve
• Photometric redshifts
• Transient sorting for 8m follow up
• Current Strawman: 1.5 m class, R I J H
AcknowledgementsWhile our designs developed independently, many of the ideas here were also arrived at, in connection with the TOMBO* project, by Y. Ohno, T. Ebisuzaki, K. Sunouchi, R. Susukita, C. Otani, H. M. Shimizu, A. Yoshida, No. Kawai, M. Matsuoka, M. Euno, T. Wada, M. Yamauchi and N. Takeyama, Riken Review No. 47, July 2002. We acknowledge discussions with C. Akerlof.
*TOMBO stands for Tombo Observing for Microlensing and Bursting Objects.