14
Leveraging social learning technologies in corporate environments Robin Yap, Canada (www.robinyap.com) Joost Robben, The Netherlands (www.joostrobben.info)

Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation of Robin Yap and Joost Robben at the Networked Learning Conference, may 2010, Aalborg. Presenting paper on leveraging social technologies. See also www.joostrobben.nl or www.robinyap.com

Citation preview

Page 1: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Leveraging social learning technologies in corporate

environments

Robin Yap, Canada (www.robinyap.com)

Joost Robben, The Netherlands (www.joostrobben.info)

Page 2: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4
Page 3: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Download paper from:http://www.joostrobben.info/?p=135

Page 4: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Importance of trust• Fundamental to building

relationships and learning (Harris, 2002)

• Repeating factor as foundation for Social Capital

 "It is important to support collective

learning through social learning technologies by focusing on the group dynamics that are needed to organize

and coordinate learning" (De Laat, 2006)

Page 5: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Social learning technologies

Web as social platform with services that enable people to create content,

connect, and share with others

ProfileConnectShare

Page 6: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Social networking

Profiling•Employment History•Interests and

Expertise

Connecting•Recommen-dations

Sharing•Blogs•Microblogs

Page 7: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Networked learning"Learning in which

ICT is used to promote

connections" (Goodyear, et al. 2004)

 

Page 8: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Networked learning

  • Knowledge = Social• New possibilities for Social Web Technologies• Learning can take place in Networked

Environments• Communities of Practice

  

"People are increasingly sharing, discussing and negotiating knowledge through computer networks, therefore stressing the social nature of learning"

(de Laat, 2006)

 

Page 9: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Social capital        

Connections among individuals - social

networks and the norms of reciprocity and trust that arise from them.

(Putnam, 2000)

Page 10: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Why invest in social technologies?

• Need for organizations to be knowledge productive (Kessels, 2000)

  

The competitive advantage of organizations does not come from

knowledge itself but from the ability to make knowledge productive

(Stam, 2007)

Page 11: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Case studies

o Canadao Netherlands

 • Testing viability of the model

 • Interviews

http

://tinyu

rl.com

/2w

yn9

hc

Page 12: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

• Span from Low to High Affinity to technology• Corporate Roles: Individual Contributor to Management •Company size: 75,000•Business Unit : 350

Office Communicator (OC)Adobe Connect / Live Meeting WebcamsOutlook / Sharepoint

Discussion - WikiImmediacy - OCProfile – White pagesCommunication- Outlook

Initial Interview ResultsConnectingTechnologyParticipants

Yammer• High Affinity to Technology

• Corporate Role: : Individual Contributor to Management

• Company size: 130• Business Unit 55

Yammer • Profile• Communication

Recommendations

• Connect to everyone

Page 13: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

• Trust as foundational• Credibility v Competition• Outlook as primary connection still• Lurker participants now are active collaborators• Initial connection established immediately

KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTIVITY

PROFILE

CONNECTSHARE

Insights

• Trust not an issue• Lurkers abound• “Literally more connected”• Real life connection• Distraction

Page 14: Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4

Q&A