1
P r o j e c t 1 : P r o f i li n g E x t r a c e l l u l a r R N A C o m m u n i c a t i o n i n A c t i o n P r o j e c t 2 : B i o l o g i c a l R e c o g n i t i o n o f N a n o p a rt i c l e s O u r I m a g i n g S t r a t e g i e s Zebrafish as a Model for Nano-Bioimaging Yuya Hayashi (formal supervisor: Claus Oxvig) e-mail: [email protected] web: mbg.au.dk/yuya-hayashi/ MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND GENETICS DEPARTMENT OF AARHUS UNIVERSITY AU 1. "Differential Nanoparticle Sequestration by Macrophages and Scavenger Endothelial Cells Visualized in Vivo in Real-Time and at Ultrastructural Resolution" in ACS Nano (2020) doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b07233 2. "Tracing the In Vivo Fate of Nanoparticles with a Non-Self Biological Identity" in ACS Nano (2020) doi: 0.1021/acsnano.0c05178 Recent publications from the group dpf, days-post-fertilization. mpi/hpi, minutes-/hours-post-injection. CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy. CLEM, correlative light-electron microscopy. TEM, transmission electron microscopy. Intravenous microinjection of nanoparticles 500 μm 3 dpf embryo Bright-Field x x y y z 20 μm Blood vessels Macrophages Nanoparticles 100 μm Real-Time Bioimaging and Screening Electron microscopy (TEM) 20 μm Blood vessels Macrophages Nanoparticles 20 μm 3 mpi Macrophages Nanoparticles tnf-alpha 20 μm 1 hpi 6 hpi 30 mpi Chemical fixation 20 μm TEM (pseudo-coloured) Blood vessels Macrophages Nanoparticles captured by macrophages Nanoparticle Sequestration Nanoparticle Clearance Macrophage Activation 4D Live-cell Imaging 3 μm 500 nm 3 μm 1 μm 50 μm Toluidine Blue Correlative Light-Electron Microscopy (CLEM) Macrophages Nanoparticles Overlay (CLSM + TEM) TEM Cryo-fixation (high-pressure freezing) Control (unmodified) + FBS protein corona 20 μm Blood vessels 70 nm SiO 2 nanoparticles 3 mpi 30 mpi 3 mpi 30 mpi 100 nm Protein coronas visualized by TEM (right). SiO2 nanoparticles (70 nm) with a corona pre-formed of fetal bovine serum (FBS) were negatively stained for TEM imaging. Inset shows a pristine (unmodified) nanoparticle. 20 μm Blood vessels Extracellular vesicles (pHluorin-labelled) GFP-Trap Magnetic beads Y Y Y Y Fluorescent tag fused to an extracellular loop of tetraspanins Affinity purification 2. RNAseq 1. LC-MS/MS Whole-embryo homogenization Endogenously-labelled fluorescent extracellular vesicles circulating in the blood Live imaging plasmid Tol2 transgenesis vector Cell type-specific promoter Tetraspanin-fluorescent tag Cargo profiling 1. Proteins 2. Small RNAs What we do eeing is believing. Starring zebrafish as a model organism, we image life at the nanoscale “visualizing” how innate immu- nity works at the interface with blood. Of particular interest are macrophages: the cells that eat/clean up foreign materials, pathogens and dead cells to maintain homeostasis of our body. How do they recognize nanoparticles cir- culating in the blood? What are their role in inflammation? With zebrafish, we seek an- swers to these questions in a manner not possible using cell cultures or rodent models. This year, we offer two exciting project possibilities in which you will play a role applying genetics/molecular biology techniques and learning complex image analysis methods. S ransgenic lines with a cell type-specific fluorescent protein re- porter allow us to study the dynamic behaviour of macrophages and how injected nanomaterials are cleared from the bloodstream. Electron microscopy (TEM) can then complement the real-time observations by visualizing those processes at the nanoscale. A marriage of the two imaging approaches is CLEM, by which we can link the fluorescent reporters (i.e. cell-type identity) to ultrastructure observed by TEM. T hat lies at the interface of biological receptors and nanoparticles? Today, it is widely accepted that cells “see” the proteins adsorbed to nanoparticles (a.k.a. “protein corona”) rather than the bare particle surface. Using proteomics and imaging/screening approach- es, we study how protein coronas determine the fate of nanoparticles injected into the blood. Internal collaboration partner: Prof. Duncan Sutherland (iNANO) W xtracelluler vesicles (EVs) were once believed to be just waste released from cells. Over the past decades we have started to appreciate the many faces of EVs – they are indeed bags filled with secrets. EVs have a size range from nano- to micrometres, and thus the imaging approaches we use for bionanoscience have technical overlaps. Using zebrafish as an in vivo model, we are also develop- ing a new method to profile the EV cargo "in transit" from donor cells to understand what messages are conveyed for cell-to-cell communication. Internal collaboration partner: Prof. Jørgen Kjems (MBG/iNANO) E

YH Group poster 2020(size reduced) - Molekylærbiologi · 2020. 8. 21. · Chemical- / Cryo-fixation (CLEM) TEM (pseudo-coloured) Blood vessels Macrophages 20 µm Nanoparticles in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Project

    1: Profiling Extracellular RNA Comm

    unication in Action

    Proj

    ect 2

    : B

    iolog

    ical Re

    cognition of Nanoparticles

    Our

    Imag

    ing

    Stra

    tegi

    es

    j

    p

    j

    Zebrafish as a Model for Nano-BioimagingYuya Hayashi

    (formal supervisor: Claus Oxvig) e-mail: [email protected]: mbg.au.dk/yuya-hayashi/

    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND GENETICS DEPARTMENT OF

    AARHUS UNIVERSITY AU1. "Differential Nanoparticle Sequestration by Macrophages and Scavenger Endothelial Cells Visualized in Vivo in Real-Time

    and at Ultrastructural Resolution" in ACS Nano (2020) doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b072332. "Tracing the In Vivo Fate of Nanoparticles with a Non-Self Biological Identity" in ACS Nano (2020) doi: 0.1021/acsnano.0c05178

    Recent publications from the group

    dpf, days-post-fertilization. mpi/hpi, minutes-/hours-post-injection.CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy. CLEM, correlative light-electron microscopy. TEM, transmission electron microscopy.

    Intravenous microinjection of nanoparticles

    500 μm 3 dp

    f em

    bryo

    Brig

    ht-F

    ield

    x

    x

    y y

    z

    20 μm

    Bloo

    d ve

    ssel

    sM

    acro

    phag

    esN

    anop

    artic

    les

    100 μm

    Real-Time Bioimaging and Screening Electron microscopy (TEM)

    20 μm

    Bloo

    d ve

    ssel

    sM

    acro

    phag

    esN

    anop

    artic

    les

    20 μm

    3 mpiM

    acro

    phag

    esN

    anop

    artic

    les

    tnf-a

    lpha 20 μm

    1 hpi 6 hpi30 mpi

    Chemical fixation

    20 μm TEM

    (pse

    udo-

    colo

    ured

    )Bl

    ood

    vess

    els

    Mac

    roph

    ages

    Nan

    opar

    ticle

    s ca

    ptur

    edby

    mac

    roph

    ages

    Nanoparticle Sequestration

    Nanoparticle Clearance

    Macrophage Activation

    4D Live-cell Imaging

    3 μm 500 nm

    3 μm

    1 μm

    50 μm

    Tolu

    idin

    e Bl

    ue

    Correlative Light-Electron

    Microscopy (CLEM)

    Mac

    roph

    ages

    Nan

    opar

    ticle

    sO

    verla

    y(C

    LSM

    + T

    EM)

    TEM

    Cryo-fixation (high-pressure freezing)

    Control (unmodified) + FBS protein corona

    20 μm

    Bloo

    d ve

    ssel

    s70

    nm

    SiO

    2 nan

    opar

    ticle

    s

    3 mpi 30 mpi 3 mpi 30 mpi

    100 nm

    Protein coronas visualized by TEM (right).SiO2 nanoparticles (70 nm) with a corona

    pre-formed of fetal bovine serum (FBS)were negatively stained for TEM imaging.

    Inset shows a pristine (unmodified) nanoparticle.

    20 μm

    Bloo

    d ve

    ssel

    sEx

    trace

    llula

    r ves

    icle

    s(p

    Hlu

    orin

    -labe

    lled)

    GFP-TrapMagnetic beadsY Y

    YY

    Fluorescent tag fusedto an extracellular loop

    of tetraspanins

    Affinity purification

    2. RNAseq

    1. LC-MS/MS

    Whole-embryo homogenization

    Endogenously-labelled fluorescentextracellular vesicles

    circulating in the blood

    Live

    imag

    ing

    plasmidTol2 transgenesis vector Cell type-specific promoter Tetraspanin-fluorescent tag

    Cargo profiling1. Proteins2. Small RNAs

    What we doeeing is believing. Starring zebrafish as a model organism, we image life at the

    nanoscale “visualizing” how innate immu-nity works at the interface with blood.

    Of particular interest are macrophages:the cells that eat/clean up foreignmaterials, pathogens and dead cells to maintain homeostasis of our body.

    How do they recognize nanoparticles cir-culating in the blood? What are their role in inflammation? With zebrafish, we seek an-swers to these questions in a manner not possible using cell cultures or rodent models.

    This year, we offer two exciting projectpossibilities in which you will play a role applying genetics/molecular biology techniques andlearning complex image analysis methods.

    S

    ransgenic lines with a cell type-specific fluorescent protein re-porter allow us to study the dynamic behaviour of macrophages

    and how injected nanomaterials are cleared from the bloodstream.Electron microscopy (TEM) can then complement the real-time

    observations by visualizing those processes at the nanoscale.

    A marriage of the two imaging approaches is CLEM, by which we can link the fluorescent reporters

    (i.e. cell-type identity) to ultrastructure observed by TEM.

    T

    hat lies at the interface of biological receptors andnanoparticles? Today, it is widely accepted that cells

    “see” the proteins adsorbed to nanoparticles (a.k.a. “protein corona”) rather than the bare particle surface.

    Using proteomics and imaging/screening approach-es, we study how protein coronas determine the

    fate of nanoparticles injected into the blood.

    Internal collaboration partner:Prof. Duncan Sutherland (iNANO)

    W

    xtracelluler vesicles (EVs) were once believed to be just waste released from cells. Over the past decades we have

    started to appreciate the many faces of EVs – they are indeed bags filled with secrets. EVs have a size range from nano- to micrometres, and thus the imaging approaches we use for bionanoscience have technical overlaps.Using zebrafish as an in vivo model, we are also develop-ing a new method to profile the EV cargo "in transit" from donor cells to understand what messages are conveyed for cell-to-cell communication.

    Internal collaboration partner:Prof. Jørgen Kjems (MBG/iNANO)

    E