CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF CEREALS

INDRA K. VASIL Laboratory of Plant Cell and Molecular Biology 1143 Fifield Hall University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-0690, USA

ABSTRACf. Efficient methods for the regeneration of plants from cultured cells of gramineous species were developed during the 1980's, based on the culture of tissue/organ explants comprised largely of undifferentiated cells on media containing high concentrations of 2,4-dicblorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). These advances, combined with the later development ofmethods for the direct delivery of DNA, led to the production of the fIrst transgenic cereals in 1988. Since then, in the relatively short period of six years, all major cereal crops have been transformed, often with agronomically useful genes that confer resistance to non-selective herbicides, or viruses and insects. Such improved crops can reduce or even eliminate the huge losses in crop productivity caused by weeds, pathogens and pests. Further molecular improvement of cereals will depend on the availability of genes that determine the quality and productivity of cereal crops, and protect them from biological and environmental stresses.

INTRODUCfION

Plants account for 93% of the human diet, and even the remaining 7% is indirectly contributed by plants through animal products (Borlaug 1983, Vasil 1990). Of the more than 250,000 species of angiosperms, a mere 29 provide most of our calories and proteins. The most important of these are the eight cereal grains (wheat, rice, maize, barley, oats, rye, sorghum, pearl millet) of the family Gramineae (poaceae), which together constitute the centerpiece of world agriculture by providing 52% of the total food calories. The primitive forms of many cereals were amongst the handful of plants that were first domesticated during the Neolithic age nearly 10,000 years ago, when agriculture gradually replaced hunting and gathering. In retrospect, the choices made by the Neolithic man have not only proven to be wise and remarkably durable, but have also helped to sustain the development of the human civilization by providing a rich and dependable source of nutrition for the ever increasing world population.

The dramatic increases in the yields and production of cereal grains achieved by breeding and selection during 1950-1984, kept pace with the rapidly growing world population and prevented widespread hunger and famine. Such increases can not be realistically sustained indefmitely, and indeed during the past ten years grain yields and production have begun to decline. Yet by various estimates world population will double to nearly 11 billion some time between 2030 to 2050, of which more than 90010 will reside in the already overpopulated and undernourished countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America. This huge increase in population will cause even more rapid degradation of the already fragile environment, and will further decrease per capita supplies of crop land, grain and water,

5

M. Terzi et al. (eds.), Current Issues in Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology, 5-18. © 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

6

all at a time when food supplies should be actually more than doubled just to meet the basic needs of human nutrition.

Plant improvement by breeding is severely restricted by the availability of a rather limited gene pool owing to natural incompatibilities, even between related species, and by the time scale of most breeding programs. Therefore, much attention has been directed recently to the newly emerging and novel technologies of plant cell and molecular biology (biotechnology), which provide a powerful means to supplement and complement the traditional methods of plant improvement, by permitting access to an unlimited gene pool through the transfer of desirable genes between any two species of interest, irrespective of their evolutionary or taxonomic relationships.

Advances in plant cell culture research, especially of major crop species, have played an increasingly critical role in the development of modern plant biotechnology (Vasil 1990). Widely used protocols for the regeneration of plants from cultured cells of dicotyledonous species (dicots) were already available in the early 1980's, when Agrobacterium-based methods for DNA delivery and integration were developed, leading to the production of the frrst transgenic plants in 1983 (Fraley et al. 1983, Zambryski et al. 1983). The difficulties faced with the adaptation of these procedures for the transformation of cereals led to the development of alternative strategies and technologies for the improvement of cereals. In this brief review, I describe the key components of these strategies, and highlight the significant advances in the molecular improvement of cereal crops.

PLANT REGENERATION FROM CULTURED CELLS

Prior to 1980, there were only scattered reports of plant regeneration from tissue cultures of gramineous species. In most instances regeneration was sporadic and transient, limited to obscure genotypes of a few species, and was based either on the de novo formation of shoot meristems in callus cultures or the 'microtillering' of preexisting meristems (Vasil 1987). Four significant discoveries were made in 1980-1981 that form the basis of much of the modem work on tissue culture of cereals: (a) That the culture of immature embryos, and segments of young inflorescences and bases of immature leaves at defined stages of development, (b) on simple nutrient media containing high concentrations of strong auxins like 2,4-D, (c) gives rise to long-term embryogenic callus cultures in which plant regeneration takes place via the formation of somatic embryos, and that (d) embryogenic cell suspension cultures derived from the embryogenic calli yield totipotent protoplasts (Dale 1980, Vasil and Vasil 1980, 1981, Wernicke andBrette1l1980, Haydu and Vasil 1981, Lu and Vasil 1981). During the past 15 years, these strategies have been successfully used to develop reliable and efficient methods for the regeneration of plants from all of the important species of cereals as well as grasses (Vasil and Vasil 1994).

The importance of the physiological condition as well as the developmental state of the explant has been found to be related to the endogenous levels of plant growth regulators (Rajasekaran et al. 1987a,b, Carnes and Wright 1988, Wenck et al. 1988). Although regeneration in vitro is a function of the genotype of the donor plant, regeneration has been obtained by a judicious choice of explant and nutrient media from a wide variety of germplasm in most species, including those which were once considered to be recalcitrant.

Somatic embryogenesis is the predominant mode of regeneration in cereal species (Vasil and Vasil 1986, 1994). This is significant, because the somatic embryos, like their zygotic counterparts, are derived directly or indirectly from single cells, are non-chimeric in nature and possess a root-shoot axis which is critical for their transfer to, and survival in, soil. Another useful characteristic of plants derived from somatic embryos is their uniformity and genetic fidelity. These are attributed to a

7

stringent selection during somatic embryogenesis, and the inability of somatic embryos derived from genetically aberrant cells to develop into mature viable embryos (Swedlund and Vasil 1985, Hanna et al. 1984, Rajasekaran et al. 1986, Cavallini et al. 1987, Kobayashi 1987, Breiman et al. 1989, Cavallini and Natali 1989, Morrish et al. 1990, Gmitter et al. 1991, Shimron-Abarbanell and Breiman 1991, Shenoy and Vasil 1992, Chowdhury and Vasil 1993, Isabel et al. 1993, Valles et al. 1993, Chowdhury et al. 1994). This unique characteristic of plants derived from somatic embryos makes them ideally suited not only for clonal propagation but also for genetic transformation.

Until 1987 , the only possibility to obtain transgenic cereals was by the direct delivery of DNA into protoplasts. Yet, exhaustive attempts made during 1975-1980 to induce sustained divisions in protoplasts isolated from leaves of cereal species proved to be entirely unsuccessful (Potrykus 1980, Vasil 1983, Vasil and Vasil 1992). Even today, no reliable and reproducible method is available for the recovery of plants from mesophyll protoplasts of any grass or cereal species. Therefore, based on the induction of sustained divisions in protoplasts isolated from non-morphogenic cell suspension

Table 1. Regeneration of plants from protoplasts isolated from embryogenic cell suspension cultures.

Species

Pennisetum americanum Panicum maximum Pennisetum purpureum Saccharum sp. Oryza sativa Polypogon fugax Dactylis glome rata Festuca arundinacea Lolium perenne Lolium multiflorum Zeamays

Triticum aestivum Setaria italica Agrostis alba Sorghum vulgare Hordeum vulgare Oryza rufipogon Agrostis palustris Paspalum dilatatum Festuca pratensis Oryza granulata Poa pratensis Triticum durum Hordeum murinum Festuca rubra

Reference

Vasil and Vasil 1980 Lu et al. 1981 Vasil et al. 1983, Wan and Vasil 1994 Srinivasan and Vasil 1986, Chen et al. 1988 Yamada et al. 1986, Kyozuka et al. 1987, Datta et al. 1990a Chen and Xia 1987 Hom et al. 1988a Dalton 1988 Dalton 1988, Creemers-Molenaar et al. 1989 Dalton 1988, Wang et al. 1993a Rhodes et al. 1988a, Prioli and Sondahll989, Shillito et al. 1989, Morocz et al. 1990 Vasil et al. 1990, Ahmed and Sagi 1993 Dong and Xia 1990 Asano and Sugiura 1990 Wei and Xu 1990 J ahne et al. 1991, "Holm et al. 1994 Baset et al. 1991 Terakawa et al. 1992 Akashi and Adachi 1992 Wang et al. 1993b Baset et al. 1993 Nielsen et al. 1993 Yang et al. 1993 Wang and Lorz 1994 Spangenberg et al. 1994

"From mechanically isolated fertilized egg cell protoplasts.

8

cultures, attempts were made to establish embryogenic suspension cultures as a source of totipotent protoplasts (Vasil and Vasil 1980, 1981). This strategy proved to be most useful, as plants have been regenerated from protoplasts isolated from embryogenic suspension cultures of a large number of gramineous species, including all the major cereal crops (Table 1). It should be noted, however, that the establishment of regenerable embryogenic suspension cultures is still a difficult and tedious procedure. Fmthermore, in some species (eg. maize and wheat), such cultures can be established only from a special type of callus. Nevertheless, once established, such cultures can be cryopreserved to provide a permanent and reliable source of totipotent protoplasts (Shillito et al. 1989, Gnanapragasam and Vasil 1990, Meijer et al. 1991, Fretz et al. 1992, Lu and Sun 1992, Wan and Vasil 1994).

For almost twenty years, somatic hybridization has been billed as a potentially powerful tool for creating new and useful hybrids that can not otherwise be obtained by breeding. Unfortunately, with a few exceptions, this has generally not proven to be true. In cereals, few somatic hybrids have been obtained, as of Oryza sativa (+) Echinochloa oryzicola (Terada et al. 1987), or Festuca arundinacea (+)Lolium multiflorum (Takamizo et al. 1991). Perhaps the best use of this procedure is in the transfer of cytoplasmic male sterility, as was demonstrated in rice (Kyozuka et al. 1989, Yang et al. 1989). Also, in vitro fusion of egg and sperm cell protoplasts of maize, leading to the generation of fertile plants (Kranz and Lorz 1993), provides a powerful new tool for the study of cell to cell interaction and the process of fertilization.

TRANSFORMATION OF CEREALS

Genetic transformation of dicot species has been greatly aided by the natural transformation system provided by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. It has become a preferred and popular method because it requires minimal exposure of cells to tissue culture conditions, and provides high frequencies of transformation with single copy insertions which appear to be less prone to methylation and silencing. It is not surprising, therefore, that extensive attempts have been made to transform cereals with Agrobacterium. However, in spite of many attempts and a few reports (Hess et al. 1990, Gould et al. 1991, Chan et al. 1993), no unambiguous and clear evidence for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereals has ever been presented. Indeed, it has been suggested that the reported claims of transformation may be actually artifacts caused by the transformation of an endophytic organism associated with the host plants (Langridge et al. 1992, Chen et al. 1994). It is known, nevertheless, that Agrobacterium can deliver viral genomic sequences to cereal cells resulting in systemic viral infection (Grimsleyet al. 1987, Dale et al. 1989, Shen et a!. 1993). This process, termed "agroinfection", does not result in the integration of the viral genes into the plant genome. It is thus likely that the difficulties faced with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereals lie in the integration, rather than the delivery of genes, and may be eventually overcome with further understanding of the process of transformation.

In the mean time, other useful methods, based on the direct delivery of DNA into protoplasts as well as intact cells and tissues, have been developed for the transformation of cereals. All of the early successes, including the fIrst transgenic cereal (maize, Rhodes et al. 1988b) and grass (Orchard grass, Hom et al. 1988b) plants, were based on DNA delivery into protoplasts by osmotic (polyethylene glycol treatment) or electric (electroporation) shock. Although this procedure has proven to be very useful for rice, maize and some grass species (Table 2), its use is limited because of dependence on totipotent protoplasts isolated from embryogenic suspension cultures, both of which are difficult to obtain and maintain in culture.

9

The development of the biolistics procedure, based on the high velocity bombardment of DNA-coated microprojectiles into intact cells and tissues (Sanford et al. 1987, 1991, Klein et al. 1992), has provided an important alternative to the use ofprotoplasts for cereal transformation. Within a short period of four years, from 1990 to 1994, it was used to produce transgenic plants of maize, rice, wheat, oats, barley, sorghum, rye, and important grass species, like sugarcane (Table 2). The delivery of DNA directly into regenerable cells or tissues substantially reduces the time that the cells must be maintained in culture. The immature embryo, which is the most widely used explant for plant regeneration in cereals, has proven to be particularly useful for the biolistic delivery of DNA and the production of transgenic plants.

More recently, transgenic maize and rice plants have been also obtained by electroporating DNA into enzymatically or mechanically wounded suspension culture cells, callus or embryos (D'Halluin et al. 1992, Laursen et al. 1994, Xu and Li 1994).

Table 2 lists all transgenic cereal and grass species produced to date. It includes many examples where agronomically useful genes for resistance to non-selective herbicides, viruses and

Table 2. Transgenic cereals and grasses obtained by the direct delivery of DNA into protoplasts (P), by high velocity microprojectile bombardment (B), and by tissue electroporation (E).

Species

Dactylis glome rata Zea mays

Oryza sativa

Avena sativa Festuca arundinacea Saccharum sp. hybrid Triticum aestivum

Sorghum bicolor Agrostis pa!ustris Agrostis alba Hordeum vulgare Secale cereale Festuca rubra Tritordeum

Method of Transformation

P P

B

E P

B E B P B B

B B P B B P B

Reference

Hom et al. 1988b Rhodes et al. 1988b, Golovkin et al. 1993, Omirulleh et al. 1993, Sukhapinda et al. 1993 "Fromm et al. 1990, "Gordon-Kamm et al. 1990, bKoziel et al. 1993, "Murry et al. 1993 D'Halluin et al. 1992, "Laursen et al. 1994 Shimamoto et al. 1989, Datta et al. 1990b, "1992, "Hayakawa et al. 1992, .. dUchimiya et al. 1993, bFujimoto et al. 1993 "Christou et al. 1991, Li et al. 1993 Xu and Li 1994 "Somers et al. 1992 "Wang et al. 1992, Ha et al. 1992 Bower and Birch 1992 "Vasil et al. 1992, 1993, "Weeks et al. 1993, "Becker et al. 1994, "Nehra et al. 1994 "Cassas et al. 1993 Zhong et al. 1993 Asano and Ugaki 1994 Ritala et al. 1994 , "Wan and Lemaux 1994 "Castillo et al. 1994 "Spangenberg et al. 1994 Barcelo et al. 1994

"herbicide resistant, binsect resistant, "virus resistant, dfungus resistant

10

insects, have been introduced. In several instances field evaluations of transgenic cereals have been performed, but most of this information is proprietaIy and has not been published, except for insect resistant maize which performed well under field conditions (Koziel et al. 1993)

A number of other strategies have been used for the direct delivery of DNA into cereal cells (Vasil 1994). Some of these have resulted in the production of transgenic callus tissues (Kaeppler et al. 1992, Rasmussen et al. 1994). Attempts to transform germ line cells by microtargetting (Sautter et al. 1991, Iglesias et al. 1994) or microinjection (Simmonds et al. 1992) have so far not been successful. Claims of transgenic plants produced by macroinjection of plasmid DNA into flowering tillers of rye (de la Pena et al. 1987) and barley (Rogers and Rogers 1992), or of transgenic plants obtained. by the pollen tube pathway (Luo and Wu 1988, Hess et al. 1990), did not provide evidence for the integration of the transgene into germ line cells and its Mendelian segregation. Some of these results could be attributed to the transformation of an endophyte residing in the host plant (Langridge et al. 1992, Chen et at. 1994).

The success achieved in the transformation of cereals is due not only to the development of novel means of DNA delivery, but also to the use of efficient reporter and selectable marker genes, and powerful promoters and introns, to ensure high levels of gene expression (Vasil 1994). The most widely used reporter gene is the p-glucuronidase (gus) gene of Escherichia coli, that can be readily evaluated by both histochemical and fluorometric assays (Jefferson et al. 1987). The neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptlI) and hygromycin phosphotransferase (hph) genes of E. coli, which confer resistance to kanamycin and hygromycin, respectively, have also proven to be useful for cereal transformation (Shimamoto et al. 1989, Datta et al. 1990b, Battraw and Hall 1992, d'Halluin et al. 1992, Walters et al. 1992, Murry et al. 1993, Sukhapinda et al. 1993, Nehra et al. 1994). The dhfr gene conferring resistance to methotrexate has been used to select maize transformants (Golovkin et al. 1993).

The high levels of natural resistance to antibiotics exhibited by cereal species (Hauptmann et al. 1988), and continuing concerns regarding the presence of antibiotic resistance genes in food crops, have prompted the use of other selectable marker genes. Amongst these, the bar gene of Streptomyces hygroscopicus has been used most successfully and widely in cereal transformation (Fromm et al. 1990, Gordon-Kanun et al. 1990, Christou et al. 1991, Somers et al. 1992, Vasil et al. 1992,1993, Cassas et al. 1993, Weeks et al. 1993, Castillo et al. 1994, Wan and Lemaux 1994). It encodes the enzyme phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT), providing resistance to the non-selective broad­spectrum herbicide basta (glufosinate, bialaphos). The use of herbicide resistance genes as selectable markers has the advantage that it helps to produce agronomically useful transgenic plants without the presence of any unnecessary DNA sequences, such as those for antibiotic resistance. However, in order to eliminate the possibility of weeds becoming resistant to herbicides, the use of such genes is not recommended in crops like oats (Somers et al. 1992) and sorghum (Cassas et al. 1993), which can interbreed with weeds like wild oat and Johnson grass, respectively.

In order to be useful, the introduced genes must be expressed at high levels during the selection process (selectable marker genes) as well as in planta (agronomically useful genes). This depends largely on the promoters used to drive the genes (Vasil 1994). The constitutively expressed 35S promoter of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is the most widely used promoter in plant transformation. However, the levels of gene expression obtained in cereals by this promoter are upto 100-fold less than in dicots (Fromm et al. 1985, Hauptmann et al. 1987). Duplication of the CaMV 35S promoter sequences, known to enhance gene expression (Kay et al. 1987), has been used to obtain transgenic maize plants (Omirulleh et al. 1993). However, the highest level of gene expression in cereals has been obtained by the use ofintrons, such as intron 1 oftheAdh 1 gene (Callis et al. 1987) or intron 1 of the Sh 1 gene (Vasil et al. 1989), of maize. In addition, three monocot promoters have

II

been shown to increase gene expression: pEMU (Last et al. 1991), Actin 1 (Act 1) gene of rice (Zhang et al. 1991), and the Ubiquitin 1 (Ubi 1) gene of maize (Christensen et al. 1992). Amongst these, Ubi 1 has been shown to provide the highest levels of gene expression (Cornejo et al. 1993, Taylor et al. 1993), and has been used to obtain transgenic plants of wheat, rice and barley (Toki et al. 1992, Vasil et al. 1993, Weeks et al. 1993, Wan and Lemaux 1994). Nevertheless, the efficiency of transformation obtained in cereals is still low compared to the results in dicots with Agrobacterium. In most instances, it is in the range of 0.1-1.0%, although higher frequencies have been reported in a few cases (Li et al. 1993, Wan and Lemaux 1994). Transformation efficiency must be substantially increased in order to produce the large numbers of independently transformed fertile lines which are needed for field evaluations. This will require improvements in all aspects of transformation technology, including gene integration and expression, selection of transformed lines and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants.

Conclusions

Efficient regeneration of fertile plants from cultured cells, combined with novel methods of DNA delivery and selection of transformed cells, has resulted in the production of transgenic plants in all of the major cereal crops. In most instances agronomically useful genes - which confer resistance to broad-spectrum, environmentally desirable, and non-selective herbicides, or to viral pathogens and insect pests - have been introduced. This is particularly noteworthy, keeping in mind that nearly a third of the productivity of most cereal crops is lost to weeds, pests and pathogens. Therefore, the introduction of such engineered crops in agricultural production should help to increase food productivity. However, further molecular improvement of cereals in the near future will be limited most by the lack of our knowledge about, and access to, important and useful genes. Therefore, high priority should be given to the development of DNA -based maps of cereals (Phillips and Vasil 1994) and the identification and cloning of agronomically important genes (eg. those controlling multi genic traits like yield, and resistances to biotic and abiotic stresses). In this respect, the conservation of gene order along chromosomes among various cereal species, as well as similarity of gene composition and map linearity (Bennetzen and Freeling 1993, Kurata et al. 1994), should be of considerable advantage. Improvements in transformation technology (higher efficiency of transformation and generation of large numbers of independently transformed fertile lines) must also take place simultaneously, in order to allow the introduction of several genes regulating a multigenic trait. This will require more precise control of copy number and sites of integration to avoid deleterious position effects. Although we can take pride in the rapid progress made in the molecular improvement of cereals, we should remember that the future benefits of this novel and powerful technology for mankind will depend on at least three factors: (a) Demonstrated safety and superiority of the engineered crops, (b) Their contribution to the development of a sustainable agricultural system, and (c) Public acceptance of the engineered plants and their products.

Acknowledgements. I wish to acknowledge and pay tribute to the more than fifty graduate students and research associates who made significant and often pioneering contributions to the research on cell culture and genetic transformation of cereals in my laboratory. It has been my pleasure, privilege and good fortune to be associated with such a dedicated group of scientists.

12

References

Ahmed KZ, F Sagi (1993) Cultw"e of and fertile plant regeneration from regenerable embryogenic cell-derived protoplasts of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Rep 12:175-179.

Akashi R, T Adachi (1992) Plant regeneration from suspension cultw"e-derived protoplasts of apomictic dallisgrass (Paspalum diiatalUm Poir.). Plant Sci 82:219-225.

Asano Y, K Sugiura (1990) Plant regeneration from suspension cultw"e-derived protoplasts of Agrostis alba L. (Redtop). Plant Sci 72:267-273.

Asano Y, M Ugaki (1994) Transgenic plants of Agrostis alba obtained by electroporation-mediated direct gene transfer into protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 13:243-246.

Barcelo P, C Hagel, D Becker, A Martin, H Lorz (1994) Transgenic cereal (tritordeum) plants obtained at high efficiency by microprojectile bombardment of inflorescence tissue. The Plant J 5:583-592.

Baset A, EC Cocking, RP Finch (1993) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of the wild rice species Oryza granulata. J Plant Physiol 141 :245-247.

Baset A, RP Finch, EC Cocking (1991) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of wild rice (Oryza rojipogon Griff). Plant Cell Rep 10:200-203.

Battraw M, TC Hall (1992) Expression of a chimeric neomycin phosphotransferase II gene in first and second generation transgenic rice plants. Plant Sci 86:191-202.

Becker D, R Brettschneider, H Lorz (1994) Fertile transgenic wheat from microprojectile bombardment of scutellar tissue. Plant J 5:299-307.

Bennetzen JL, M Freeling (1993) Grasses as a single genetic system: genome composition, collinearity and compatibility. Trends Genet 9:259-261.

Borlaug NE (1983) Contributions of conventional plant breeding to food production. Science 219:689-693. Bower R, RG Birch (1992) Transgenic sugarcane plants via mircoprojectile bombardment. Plant J 2 :409-416. Breiman A, T Felsenburg, E Galun (1989) Is Nor region variability in wheat invariably caused by tissue

cultw"e? Theor Appl Genet 77:809-814. Callis J, ME Fromm, V Walbot (1987) Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells. Genes Dev

1:1183-1200. Carnes MG, MS Wright (1988) Endogenous hormone levels of immatw"e com kernels of A188, Missouri-17,

andDeKalb XL-12. Plant Sci 57:195-203. Cassas AM, AK Kononowicz, UB Zehr, DT Tomes, JD Axtell, LG Butler, RA Bressan, PM Hasegawa

(1993) Transgenic sorghum plants via microprojectile bombardment. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 90: 11212-11216.

Castillo AM, V Vasil, IK Vasil (1994) Rapid production offertile transgenic plants of rye (Secale cereale L.). In prepraration.

Cavallini A, MC Lupi, R Cremonini, A Benici (1987) In vitro culture of Bel/evalia romana (L.) Rchb. III. Cytological study of somatic embryos. Protoplasma 139:66-70.

Cavallini A, L Natali (1989) Cytological analyses of in vitro somatic embryogenesis in Brimura amethyslina Salisb. (Liliaceae). Plant Sci 62:255-261.

Chan M, H Chang, S Ho, W Tong, S Yu (1993) Agrobacterium-mediated production of transgenic rice plants expressing a chimeric ex -amylase promoter/p -glucuronidase gene. Plant Mol Bioi 22:491-506.

Chen D, Z Xia (1987) Matw"e plant regeneration from cultured protoplasts of Polypogon fugax Nees ex Steud. Sci Sinica B 30:698-704.

Chen DF, P J Dale, JS Heslop-Harrison, JW Snape, W Harwood, S Bean, P Mullineaux (1994) Stability of transgenes and presence ofW methyladenine DNA in transformed wheat cells. Plant J 5:429-436.

Chen WH, MR Davey, JB Power, EC Cocking (1988) Sugarcane protoplasts: factors affecting division and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep 7:344-347.

Chowdhury MKU, IK Vasil (1993) Molecular analysis of plants regenerated from embryogenic cultures of hybrid sugarcane cultivars (Saccharom sp.) Theor Appl Genet 86:181-188.

Chowdhury MKU, V Vasil, IK Vasil (1994) Molecular analysis of plants regenerated from embryogenic cultures of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 87 :821-828.

13

Christensen AH, RA Sharrock, PH Quail (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes: thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Mol Bioi 18:675-689.

Christou P, 1L Ford, M Kofron (1991) Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants from agronomically important Indica and Japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Bioffechnology 9:957 -962.

Cornejo M, D Luth, KM Blankenship, OD Anderson, AE Blechl (1993) Activity of a maize ubiquitin promoter in transgenic rice. Plant Mol Bioi 23:567-581.

Creemers-Molenaar J, P van der Valk, JPM Loeffen, MACM ZaaJ (1989) Plant regeneration from suspension cultures and protoplasts of Lolium perenne L. Plant Sci 63:167-176.

Dale PJ (1980) Embryoids from cultured immature embryos of Lolium multiflorum. Z. Pflanzenphysiol 100:73-17.

Dale PJ, MS Marks, MM Brown, CJ Woolston, HV Gunn, PM Mullineaux, DM Lewis, JM Kempt, DF Chen, DM Gilmour, RB Flavell (1989) Agroinfection of wheat: inoculation of in vitro grown seedlings and embryos. Plant Sci 63:237-245.

Dalton SJ (1988) Plant regeneration from cell suspension protoplasts of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. (Tall fescue) and Lolium perenne L. (perennial ryegrass). J PI Physiol132:170-175.

Datta SK, K Datta, N Soltanifar, G Donn, I Potrykus (1992) Herbicide-resistant Indica rice plants from IRRI breeding line IR72 after PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts. Plant Mol Bioi 20:619-629.

Datta SK, K Datta, I Potrykus (199Oa) Fertile Indica rice plants regenerated from protoplasts isolated from microspore derived cell suspensions. Plant Cell Rep 9:253-256.

Datta SK, A Peterhans, K Datta, I Potrykus (1990b) Genetically engineered fertile Indica rice recovered from protoplasts. Bioffechnology 8:736-740.

De la Pena A, H Lorz, J Schell (1987) Transgenic rye plants obtained by injecting DNA into young floral tillers. Nature 235:274-276.

D'Halluin K, E Bonne, M Bossut, M De Beuckeleer, J Leemans (1992) Transgenic maize plants by tissue electroporation. Plant Cell 4:1495-1505.

Dong J, Z Xia (1990) Protoplast culture and plant regeneration of foxtail millet. Chinese Sci Bull 35:1560-1564.

Fraley RT, SG Rogers, RB Horsch, PR Sanders, JS Flick (1983) Expression of bacterial genes in plant cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 80:4803-4807.

Fretz A, A Jahne, H Lorz (1992) Cryopreservation of embryogenic suspension cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Bot Acta 105:140-145.

Fromm ME, LP Taylor, V Walbot (1985) Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 882:5824-5828.

Fromm ME, F Morrish, C Armstrong, R Williams, J Thomas, TM Klein (1990) Inheritance and expression of chimeric genes in the progeny of transgenic maize plants. Bioffechnology 8:833-839.

Fujimoto H, K Itoh, M Yamamoto, J Kyozuka, K Shimamoto (1993) Insect resistant rice generated by introduction of a modified <I-endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. Bioffechnology II: 1151-1155.

Gmitter Jr FG, X Ling, C Cai, JW Grosser (1991) Colchicine induced polyploidy in Citrus embryogenic cultures, somatic embryos and regenerated plantJets. Plant Sci 74: 135-141.

Gnanapragasam S, IK Vasil (1990) Plant regeneration from a cryopreserved embryogenic cell suspension of a commercial sugarcane hybrid (Saccharum spp.) Plant Cell Rep 9:419-423.

Golovkin MV, M Abraham, S Morocz, S Bottka, A Feher, D Dudits (1993) Production of transgenic maize plants by direct DNA uptake into embryogenic protoplasts. Plant Sci 90:41-52.

Gordon-Kamm WJ, TM Spencer, ML Mangano, TR Adams, RJ Daines, WG Start, JV O'Brien, SA Chambers, WR Adams, NG Willets, TB Rice, CJ Mackey, RW Krueger, AP Kausch, PG Lemaux (1990) Transformation of maize cells and regeneration offertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell 2:603-618.

Gould J, M Devey, 0 Hasegawa, EC Ulian, G Peterson, RH Smith (1991) Transformation of Zea mays using Agrobacterium tumefaciencs and the shoot apex. Plant Physiol 95:426-434.

Grimsley N, T Hohn, JW Davies, B Hohn (1987) Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of infectious maize streak virus into maize plants. Nature 325:177-179.

14

Ha S, F Wu, TK Thorne (1992) Transgenic turf-type tall fescue (Festuca anmdinacea Schreb.) plants regenerated from protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep II :601-604.

Hanna WW, C Lu, II( Vasil (1984) Uniformity of plants regenerated from somatic embryos of Panicum maximum Jacq. (Guinea grass). Theor Appl Genet 67: 155-159.

Hauptmann, RM, P Ozias-Akins, V Vasil, Z Tabaeizadeh, SG Rogers, RB Horsch, II( Vasil, RT Fraley (1987) Transient expression of electroporated DNA in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species. Plant Cell Rep 6:265-270.

Hauptmann RM, V Vasil, P Ozias-Akins, Z Tabaeizadeh, SG Rogers, RT Fraley, RB Horsch, II( Vasil (1988) Evaluation of selectable markers for obtaining stable transformants in the Gramineae. Plant Physiol 86:602-606.

Hayakawa T, Y Zhu, K ltoh, Y Kimura, T Izawa, K Shimamoto, S Toriyama (1992) Genetically engineered rice resistant to rice stripe virus, an insect-transmitted virus. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 89:9865-9869.

Haydu Z, II( Vasil (1981) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf tissues and anthers of Pennisetum purpureum. Theor Appl Genet 59:269-273.

Hess D, K Dressler, R Nimmrichter (1990) Transformation experiments by pipetting Agrobacterium into the spikelets of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci 72:233-244.

'101m PB, S Knudsen, P Mouritzen, D Negri, FL Olsen, C Roue (1994) Regeneration offertile barley plants from mechanically isolated protoplasts of the fertilized egg cell. Plant Cell 6:531-543.

-lorn ME, BV Conger, CT Harms (1988a) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of embryogenic suspension cultures of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Plant Cell Rep 7 :371-374.

lorn ME, RD Shillito, BV Conger, CT Harms (I 988b ) Transgenic plants of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) from protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 7:469-472.

~esias VA, A Gisel, R Bilang, N Leduc, I Potrykus, C Sautter (1994) Transient expression of visible marker genes in meristem cells of wheat embryos after ballistic micro-targetting. Planta 192:84-91.

;abel N, L Tremblay, M Michaud, FM Tremblay, J Bousquet (1993) RAPDs as an aid to evaluate the genetic integrity of somatic embryogenesis-derived populations of Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. Theor Appl Genet 86:81-87.

ihne A, PA Lazz.eri, H Lorz (1991) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts derived from embryogenic cell suspensions of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Cell Rep 10: 1-6.

:fferson RA, TA Kavanagh, MW Bevan (1987) GUS fusions: l3-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in plants. EMBO J 6:3901-3907.

leppler HF, DA Somers, HW Rines, AF Cockburn (1992) Silicon carbide fiber-mediated stable transformation of plant cells. Theor Appl Genet 84:560-566.

Iy R, A Chan, M Daly, J McPherson (\ 987) Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 230: 1299-1302.

ein TM, R Arentzen, PA Lewis, S Fitzpatrick-McElligott (1992) Transformation of microbes, plants and animals by particle bombardment. BiofTechnology 10:286-291.

Kobayashi S (1987) Uniformity of plants regenerated from orange (Citrus sinensis Osb.) protoplasts. Theor Appl Genet 74:10-14.

Koziel MG, GL Beland, C Bowman, NB Carozzi, R Crenshaw, L Crossland, J Dawson, N Desai, M Hill, S Kadwell, K Launis, K Lewis, D Maddox, K McPherson, MR Meghji, E Merlin, R Rhodes, GW Warren, M Wright, SV Evola (1993) Field performance of elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal protein derived from Bacillus thuringiensis. BiofTechnology II: 194-200.

Kranz E, H Lorz (1993) In vitro fertilization with isolated, single gametes results in zygotic embryogenesis and fertile maize plants. Plant Cell 5:739-746.

Kurata N, G Moore, Y Nagamura, T Foote, M Yano, Y Minobe, M Gale (\994) Conservation of genome structure between rice and wheat. BiofTechnology 12:276-278 (\ 994).

Kyozuka J, Y Hayashi, K Shimamoto (1987) High efficiency plant regeneration from rice protoplasts by novel nurse culture methods. Mol Gen Genet 206:408-413.

Kyozuka J, K Taneda, K Shimamoto (1989) Production of cytoplasmic male sterile rice (Oryza sativa L.) by cell fusion. BiofTechnology 7:1171-1174.

15

Langridge P, R Brettschneider, P Lazzeri, H Lorz (1992) Transfonnation of cereals via Agrobacterium and the pollen pathway: a critical assessment. Plant J 2:631-638.

Last DI, RIS Brettell, DA Chamberlain, AM Chaudhury, PJ Larkin, EL Marsh, WJ Peacock, ES Dennis (1991)pFmu: an improved promoter for gene expression in cereal cells. Theor Appl Genet 81:581-588.

Laursen CM, RA Krzyzek, CE Flick, PC Anderson, TM Spencer (1994) Production of fertile transgenic maize by electroporation of suspension culture cells. Plant Mol Bioi 24:51-61.

Li L, R Qu, A de Kochko, C Fauquet, RN Beachy (1993) An improved rice transfonnation system using the biolistic method. Plant Cell Rep 12:250-255.

Lu C, IK Vasil (1981) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf tissues of Panicum maximum Jacq. Theor Appl Genet 59:275-280.

Lu C, V Vasil, IK Vasil (1981) Isolation and culture of pro top lasts of Panicum maximum Jacq. (Guinea grass): somatic embryogenesis and plantlet fonnation. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 104:311-318.

Lu TG, CS Sun (1992) Cryopreservation of millet (Setaria italica L.). J Plant Physiol 139:295-298. Luo Z, R Wu (1988) A simple method for the transformation of rice via the pollen tube pathway. Plant Mol

BioI Rep 6:165-174. Meijer EGM, F van !ren, E Schrijnemakers, LAM Hensgens, M van Zijderveld, RA Schilperoort (1991)

Retention of capacity to produce plants from protoplasts in cyropreserved cell lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Rep .. 10:171-174.

Morocz S, G Donn, J Nemeth, D Dudits (1990) An improved system to obtain fertile regenerants via maize protoplasts isolated from a highly embryogenic suspension culture. Theor Appl Genet 80:721-726.

Morrish FM, WW Hanna, IK Vasil (1990) The expression and perpetuation of inherent somatic variation in regenerants from emrbyogenic cultures of Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. (pearl millet). Theor Appl Genet 80:409-416.

Muny LE, LG Elliott, SA Capitant, JA West, KK Hanson, L Scarafia, S Johnston, C DeLuca-Flaherty, S Nichols, D Cunanan, PS Dietrich, IJ Mettler, S Dewald, DA Warnick, C Rhodes, RM Sinibaldi, KJ Brunke (1993) Transgenic com plants expressing MDMV strain B coat protein are resistant to mixed infections of maize dwarf mosaic virus and maize chlorotic mottle virus. Bio/fechnology II: 559-564.

Nehra NS, RN Chibbar, N Leung, K Caswell, C Mallard, L Steinhauer, M Baga, KK Kartha (1994) Self-fertile transgenic wheat plants regenerated from isolated scuellar tissues following microprojectile bombardment with two distinct gene constructs. Plant J 5:285-297.

Nielsen KA, E Larsen, E Knudsen (1993) Regeneration of protoplast-derived green plants of Kentucky blue grass (Poapratensis L.). Plant Cell Rep 12:537-540.

Omirulleh S, M Abraham, M Golovkin, I Stefanov, MK Karabaev, L Mustardy, S Morocz, D Dudits (1993) Activity of a chimeric promoter with the doubled CaMV 35S enhancer element in protoplast-derived cells and transgenic plants of maize. Plant Mol BioI 21 :415-428.

Phillips RL, IK Vasil (eds) (1994) DNA-Based Markers in Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Potrykus I (1980) The old problem of protoplast culture: cereals. In: Ferenczy L, GL Farkas, G Lazar (eds),

Advances in Protoplast Research, pp 243-254. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest. Prioli LM, MR Sondahl (1989) Plant regeneration and recovery of fertile plants from protoplasts of maize

(Zea mays L.). BiolTechnology 7:589-594. Rajasekaran K, MB Hein, GC Davis, MG Carnes, IK Vasil (1987a) Endogenous plant growth regulators in

leaves and tissue cultures of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.). J Plant Physiol 130: 13-25. Rajasekaran K, MB Hein, IK Vasil (1 987b) Endogenous abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid and somatic

embryogenesis in cultured leaf explants of Pennisetum purpureum Schum.: effects in vivo and in vitro of glyphosate, fluridone and pacJobutrazol. Plant Physiol84:47-51.

Rajasekaran K, SC Schank, IK Vasil (1986) Characterization of biomass production and phenotypes of plants regenerated from embryogenic callus cultures of Pennisetum americanum x P. purpureum (hybrid Napier grass). Theor Appl Genet 73:4-10.

Rasmussen JL, JR Kikkert, MK Roy, JC Sanford (1994) Biolistic transformation of tobacco and maize suspension cells using bacterial cells as microprojectiles. Plant Cell Rep 13:212-217.

Rhodes CA, KS Lowe, KL Ruby (I 988a) Plant regeneration from protoplasts isolated from emrbyonic maize cell cutlures. BiolTechnology 6:56-60.

16

Rhodes CA, DA Pierce, IJ Mettler, D Mascarenhas, JJ Detmer (1988b) Genetically transfonned maize plants from protoplasts. Science 240:204-207.

Ritala A, K Aspergen, U Kurten, M Salmenkallio-Marttila, L Mannone, R Hannus, V Kauppinen, TH Teeri, T -M Enari (1994) Fertile transgenic barley by particle bOI\lbardment of immature embryos. Plant Mol Bioi 24:317-325.

Rogers SW, JC Rogers (1992) The importance of DNA methylation for stability offoreign DNA in barley. Plant Mol Bioi 18:945-961.

Sanford JC, TM Klein, ED Wolf, N Allen (1987) Delivery of substances into cells and tissues using a particle bombardment process. JPart Sci TechnoI5:27-37.

Sanford JC, MJ DeVit, JA Russell, FD Smith, PR Harpending, MK Roy, SA Johnson (1991) An improved, helium-driven biolistic device. Technique 3:3-16.

Sautter C, H Waldner, G Neuhaus-Uri, A Galli, G Neuhaus, I Potrykus (1991) Micro-targetting: high efficiency gene transfer using a novel approach for the acceleration of microprojectiles. Biorrechnology 9: I 080-1085.

Shen W, J Escudero, M Schlappi, C Ramos, B Hohn, Z Koukolikova-Nicola (1993) T -DNA transfer to maize cells: histochemical investigation of ~-glucuronidase activity in maize tissues. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 90:1488-1492.

Shenoy VB, 1K Vasil (1992) Biochemical and molecular analysis of plants derived from embryogenic tissue cultures of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.). Thoor Appl Genet 83:947-955.

Shimamoto K, R Terada, T Izawa, H Fujimoto (1989) Fertile transgenic rice plants regenerated from transfonned protoplasts. Nature 338:274-276.

Shimron-Abarbanell D, A Breiman (1991) Comprehensive molecular characterization of tissue culture­derived Hordeum marinum plants. Theor Appl Genet 83:71-80.

Shillito RD, GK Carswell, CM Johnson, JJ DiMaio, CT Harms (1989) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of elite inbred maize. Bioffechnology 7 :581-587.

Simmonds J, P Steward, D Simmonds (1992) Regeneration of Triticum aestivum apical explants after microinjection of germ line progenitor cells with DNA. Physiol Plant 85: 197 -206.

Somers DA, HW Rines, W Gu, HF Kaeppler, WR Bushnell (1992) Fertile, transgenic oat plants. BioI Technology 10:1589-1594.

Spangenberg G, ZY Wang, J Nagel, I Potrykus (1994) Protoplast culture and generation of transgenic plants in red fescue (Festuca rubra 1.). Plant Sci 97:83-94.

Srinivasan C, 1K Vasil (1986) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum 1.). J Plant Physiol 126:41-48.

Sukhapinda K, ME Kozuch, B Rubin-Wilson, WM Ainley, DJ Merlo (1993) Transformation of maize (Zea mays 1.) protoplasts and regeneration of haploid transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 13:63-68.

Swedlund B, 1K Vasil (1985) Cytogenetic characterization of embryogenic callus and regenerated plants of Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum. Theor Appl Genet 69:575-581.

Taylor MG, V Vasil, 1K Vasil (1993) Enhanced GUS gene expression in cereal/grass cell suspensions and immature embryos using the maize ubiquitin-based plasmid pAHC25. Plant Cell Rep 12:491-495.

Takamizo T, G Spangenberg, K Suginobu, I Potrykus (1991) Intergeneric somatic hybridization in Gramineae: somatic hybrid plants between tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and Italian ryegrass (Lotium multiflorum Lam.). Mol Gen Genet 231 : 1-6.

Terada R, J Kyozuka, S Nishibayashi, K Shimamoto (1987) Plantlet regeneration from somatic hybrids of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing.). Mol Gen Genet 210:39-43.

ferakawa T, T Sato, M Koike (1992) Plant regeneration from protoplasts isolated from embryogenic suspension cultures of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.). Plant Cell Rep 11 :457 -461.

roki S, S Takamatsu, C Nojiri, S Ooba, H Anzai, M Iwata, AH Christensen, PH Quail, H Uchimiya (1992) Expression of a maize ubiquitin gene promoter-bar chimeric gene in transgenic rice plants. Plant Physiol 100:1503-1507.

Jchimiya H, M Iwata, C Nojiri, PK Samarajeewa, S Takamatsu, S Doba, H Anzai, AH Christensen, PH Quail, S Toki (1993) Bialaphos treatment of transgenic rice plants expressing a bar gene prevents infection by the sheath blight pathogen (Rhizoctonia solani). Bioffechnology II :835-836.

17

Valles MP, ZY Wang, P Montavon, I Potrykus, G Spangenberg (1993) Analysis of genetic stability of plants regenerated ftom suspension cultures and protoplasts of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.). Plant Cell Rep 12:101-106.

Vasil IK (1983) Isolation and culture of pro top lasts of grasses. Int Rev Cytol Supp 16:79-88. Vasil IK (1987) Developing cell and tissue culture systems for the improvement of cereal and grass crops.

J Plant Physiol 128:193-218. Vasil IK (1990) The realities and challenges of plant biotechnology. BiolTechnology 8:296-301. Vasil IK (1994) Molecular improvement of cereals. Plant Mol Bioi (In Press). Vasil IK, V Vasil (1986) Regeneration in cereal and other grass species. In: Vasil IK (ed), Cell Culture and

Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol 3, Plant Regeneration and Genetic Variability, pp 121-150. Academic Press, Orlando.

Vasil IK, V Vasil (1992) Advances in cereal protoplast research. Physiol Plant 85:279-283. Vasi11K, V Vasil (1994) In vitro culture of cereals and grasses. In: Vasil IK, TA Thorpe (eds), Plant Cell and

Tissue Culture, pp 293-212. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Vasil V, IK Vasil (1980) Isolation and culture of cereal protoplasts. II. Embryogenesis and plantlet formation

from protoplasts of Pennisetum americanum. Theor Appl Genet 56:97-99. Vasil V, IK Vasil (1981) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from suspension cultures of pearl

millet (Pennisetum americanum). Ann Bot 47:669-678. Vasil V, AM Castillo, ME Fromm, IK Vasil (1992) Herbicide resistant fertile transgenic wheat plants

obtained by microprojectile bombardment of regenerable embryogenic callus. BiolTechnology 10:667-674.

Vasil V, M Clancy, RJ Ferl, IK Vasil, LC Hannah (1989) Increased gene expression by the fIrst intron of maize Shrunken-J locus in grass species. Plant Physiol 91 : 1575-1579.

Vasil V, FA Redway, IK Vasil (1990) Regeneration of plants from embryogenic suspension culture protoplasts of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BiolTechnology 8:429-433.

Vasil V, V Srivastava, AM Castillo, ME Fromm, IK Vasil (1993) Rapid production of transgenic wheat plants by direct bombardment of cultured immature embryos. BiolTechnology II: 1553-1558.

Vasil V, D Wang, IK Vasil (1983) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Pennisetum purpureum Schum. (Napier grass). Z Pflanzenphysiol III :319-325.

Walters DA, CS Vetsch, DE Potts, RC Lundquist (1992) Transformation and inheritance of a hygromycin phosphotransferase gene in maize plants. Plant Mol Bioi 18: 189-200.

Wan C, IK Vasil (1994) Plant regeneration from protoplasts, emrbyogenic suspensions and cryopreserved cells of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.). In Preparation.

Wan Y, PG Lemaux (1994) Generation oflarge numbers of independently transformed fertile barley plants. Plant Physiol 104:37-48.

Wang X-H, H Lorz (1994) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of wild barley (Hordeum murinum L.). Plant Cell Rep 13:139-144.

Wang ZY, J Nagel, I Potrykus, G Spangenberg (1993a) Plants from cell suspension-derived protoplasts in Lolium species. Plant Sci 94: 179-193.

Wang Z, T Takamizo, VA Iglesias, M Osusky, J Nagel, I Potrykus, G Spangenberg (1992) Transgenic plants of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) obtained by direct gene transfer to protoplasts. Bio/Technology 10: 691-696.

Wang Z, MP Valles, P Montavon, I Potrykus, G Spangenberg (l993b) Fertile plant regeneration from protoplasts of meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.). Plant Cell Rep 12:95-100.

Weeks IT, OD Anderson, AE Blechl (1993) Rapid production of multiple independent lines of fertile transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiol 102: 1077 -1084.

Wei Z, Z Xu (1990) Regeneration of fertile plants from emrbyogenic suspension culture protoplasts of Sorghum vulgare. Plant Cell Rep 9:51-53.

Wenck AR, BV Conger, RN Trigiano, CE Sams (1988) Inhibition of somatic embryogenesis in orchard grass by endogenous cytokinins. Plant PhysioI88:990-992.

Wernicke W, R Brettell (1980) Somatic embryogenesis from Sorghum hicolor leaves. Nature 287: 138-139.

18

Xu X, B Li (1994) Fertile transgenic Indica rice plants obtained by electroporation of the seed embryo cells. Plant Cell Rep 13:237-242.

Yamada Y, ZQ Yang, DT Tang (1986) Plant regeneration from protoplast derived callus of rice (Oryza sativa L). Plant Cell Rep 4:85-88.

Yang YM, DD He, KJ Scott (1993) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf. cv. D6962). Plant Cell Rep 12:320-323.

Yang Z, T Shikanai, K Mori, Y Yamada (1989) Plant regeneration from cytoplasmic hyrids of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 77:305-310.

Zambryski P, H Joss, C Genetello, J Leemans, M Van Montagu, J Schell (1983) Ti plasmid vector for the introduction of DNA into plant cells without alteration of their normal regeneration capacity. EMBO J 2:2143-2150.

Zhang W, D McElroy, R Wu (1991) Analysis of rice Act1 5' region activity in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell 3:1155-1165.

Zhong H, MG Bolyard, C Srinivasan, MB Sticklen (1993) Transgenic plants ofturfgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) from microprojectile bombardment of embryogenic callus. Plant Cell Rep 13: 1-6.