Question of Faculty Assessment in Management Education:
A Model for Faculty Accreditation
mm bagali Professor of Management and Human Resources,
Coordinator, Research in Management,
JAIN University, India
Our Experience
Honored with AIMA-AMT, Accredited Management Teacher in Management Sciences
The paper is based on the experience of having such Professional Accreditation Award for faculty
Our Thinking Surveys and Ranking are done of B-Schools
Parameters
Infrastructure, Knowledge delivery, Corporate interface, Placements, Pedagogy approach
Industrial visits, Corporate guest faculty, Soft skills training, Student - faculty exchange, tie-up- MOU
Canteen, recreational facilities, health care, Wi-Fi, laptops………
Academic Requirements
First Class
NET-SET
M.Phil / PhD
Conference attendance
Paper publication in ISBN / ISSN…. Many more
why not Accreditation or Contribution Assessment?
Accreditation ?
3 Reasons
1.Unquestionable Integrity of Academic Excellence
2. Quality Academic contributions with continuous improvements
3. Foreign University are come(ing), hence match the delivery system
Accreditation: Paradox for Excellence
When we say Accreditation, we mean
Exceeding stated standards of quality performance in academics and related academic activity
Production of Intellectual contributions and Professional Development
The need for maintaining Professional Qualification along with AQ
Upon entering at very senior leadership roles at higher levels in academics (Dean/ Director), an Accredited teacher on the resume will stand out more to employer than one of questionable integrity
PauseYes, Need for Accreditation of
Management Faculty
AssumptionHolistic Achievement and
Contributions to the Academia
by Faculty
Thus,Confirming the ‘PAT’,
Professional Accreditation Teacher award
Question of Faculty Assessment in Management Education:
A Model for Faculty Accreditation
Assessment Parameters
Academic Development
Academic Development
Administration and positions
Administration and positionsIntellectual Contribution
Intellectual Contribution
MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy
MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy International Assignment and Network
International Assignment and Network Social Responsibility towards Nation
Social Responsibility towards Nation
Academic Development 300 points
Teaching Best Practices adopted 150
Course Development/Design 40
Case development 40
Monographs 20
Text books 30
Executive Education20
Administration and positions 50 points
Responsibility held 15
Position held 10
Committees 10
Board Member 10
Support in Instituting a 5
Chair of Excellence
Intellectual Contribution 200 points
Research Publication 50Projects 40PhD guidance 25PhD awarded 30Advisory Board on Journals / Editor 15Reviewer of papers 10Patents and copyrights 20Working papers 10
MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy 100 points
Consultancy 30
Corporate network 10
Training held in academics 20
Training held for corporate 20
Industry based projects 10
International Assignment and Network 150 points
Visiting Assignments 30
Collaboration 20
Post-Doctoral 40
Fellowship 20
Scholarship 10
Conference / Workshops organized 30
Social Responsibility 100 points
Association with NGO’s/ Red Cross 20
Social impact projects 20
Work at School level 20
Economic Development Activity 20
Teach India program 20
Other Academic Excellence areas 100 points
Associates 15
National / State Awards35
Certifications/ Exams 20
Membership to Professional Bodies10
Positions in any Organization/Governing body 10
Cultural/ Sports promotion 10
Selection Methodology
Criteria
PhD
5 years
PG Teaching, Full Time
Management Institutes
Stage 1: Peer Review Process
Considering nominees' accomplishments within Assessment parameters [The total qualifying points 501+ onwards]
orQualify in each area with 50% of total points
or Qualify in each section with 50% of total points
Stage 2: Final Review Process
Presentation
Assigned 100
Interview
Assigned 100
Panels
A. Stakeholders
B. Government Organization/ Institutions
C. Research Organization/ Institutes
D. Industry Bodies
E. Overseas Representatives
F. Corporate University
G. Combination of all
Selection Panel
Stake holdersManagement Education ….. UGC-NAAC, AICTE -NBA, and Local affiliated University, including deemed and autonomous
The National/ State Knowledge Council/
Commission, Council for higher Education, State Innovative Council, IIM, IIT, AIU, National Mission on Education, AIMA
Association - NASCCOM, NHRD, AIMS- Association of Indian Management Schools, University Representatives/ CII, FCCKI, National Skills Development Board
Post Accreditation Utility
1] Member of Board of Studies / Examiners
2]Member, various committees, AICTE/UGC, et al
3]Should be Eligible to…..1 ] Grants and Research funding from University
2] Part of Board/Member - Knowledge commission or other board
3 ] Member, LIC Committee of university, any other ad-hoc committee
4 ] Corporate offerings of MDP, Consultancy, and design of training tools and programs
5 ] Overseas Travel Grants
6] Guide Project work of MBA
4]Research committees in University
5] Guides for PhD work
Grading Scale and Stars
State Level STAR Category Points Final certification
State A Star Best in Class 91-100 High Honors
State A Star Excellent 80-90 A-Distension
State A Star Above Average 60-79 B- Distension
State B Star Average 40-59 A-Merit
State B Star Poor 20-39 B-Merit
State B Star Zero based 00-19 C-Merit
The consolidated points of Presentation and Interview
[PAT]Professional Accreditation
Teacher, Award
The author
is AIMA-A
MT,
Accredited
Managemen
t Teacher
in
Management
Sciences,
and holds
this honor
in HR and
PMIR area
since 1994
. The prop
osal is
based on t
he experie
nce of
having suc
h Accredit
ation
Certificat
ion for As
sessing
Quality an
d Professi
onal Statu
s
to faculty
of Manage
ment
Sciences.
Thanks