Download ppt - Presidential Primaries:

Transcript
Page 1: Presidential Primaries:

Presidential Primaries:

pt 2

Page 2: Presidential Primaries:

Themes What makes a frontrunner (before any

votes cast)? Where do media expectations come from? Why so much volatility in GOP polls

Page 3: Presidential Primaries:

How it works in 2012 About 2286 delegates at stake (R)

An odd sequence of events: IA (1/3), NH (1/10), SC (1/21), Fl (1/31), NV (2/4), ME (2/4*),

CO & MN (2/7), AZ & MI (2/28), WA (3/3); 10 states on 3/10, etc.

Proportional allocation of delegates if before 4/1

Results from first event have consequences for subsequent events

Page 4: Presidential Primaries:

How it worked in 2008 About 4200 delegates at stake (D)

An odd sequence of events: IA (1/3), NH (1/8), MI (1/15), NV (1/19), SC (1/26), Fl

(1/29), 23 states on 2/5/2008 WA on 2/9 (w/ 2 other states)

Page 5: Presidential Primaries:

2012 Nomination Schedule (R)State # delegates % of totalIA 28 1.21%NH 12* 0.52% SC 25* 1.09% NV 28 1.22%FL 50* 2.18%ME 24 1.05%CO & MN 76 3.32%AZ & MI 59* 2.58%WA (3/3) 43 1.88%March 6 438 19.20%

34% of delegates awarded by March 6 2012

Page 6: Presidential Primaries:

2012 GOP Nomination Super Tuesday less super

AK, GA, ID, MA, ND, OH, OK, TN, VT, VA Which candidate advantaged?

PR until April 1 Harder for frontrunner to deliver ‘knockout’

blow

Page 7: Presidential Primaries:

2008 Nomination Schedule (D)State # delegates % of totalIA 45 1.07% NV 25 .59%NH 22 .52%SC 45 1.07% FL (1/29) 185 4.40%23 states on 2/5 2075 51.36%WA on 2/9 97 2.31%LA, NE, VI (2/9) 110 2.72%

61% of delegates awarded by Feb 10 2008

Page 8: Presidential Primaries:

Primary campaigns Concentrate resources on early states

Visits, spending, ads

Hope for momentum; force others out early

See NYT map

Page 9: Presidential Primaries:

How it works Frontloading

Early wins for frontrunner IA, NH, done by Super Tuesday

Momentum & inevitability or.... no clear winner

Party Establishment advantage PLEOs, endorsements (168 GOP PLEOs, 7%)

Funding Most money = winner

Page 10: Presidential Primaries:

How it was supposed to work ‘08 2008 frontrunners

H. R. Clinton led national polls Oct 06 -

Feb 08 led IA polls Aug - Dec 07

Giuliani Led national polls 2007 Romney led in IA McCain never more than

20% until Jan 13 2008

Page 11: Presidential Primaries:

How it was supposed to work ‘12 2012 frontrunner?

Trump (26% April ‘11) Romney (25% June ) Bachman (27% IA Aug) Perry (32% Sept) Cain (26% Oct.) Gingrich (35% Dec.) Paul (25% IA Dec.) Romney (26% today)

Page 12: Presidential Primaries:

Iowa 2012 Romney 24.5 Santorum 24.5 Paul 21.4 Gingrich 13.3 Perry 10.3 Bachman 5.0 Huntsman 0.6

Page 13: Presidential Primaries:

What Influence of Iowa & NH? Since Carter (1976)

More visits to IA More time in IA More spending in IA More media in IA same w/ NH

Greater importance of IA? 2011 Straw poll 2007 Straw poll

Sam Brownback, Tommy Thompson, Huckabee

Dan Quayle 1999

Page 14: Presidential Primaries:

Why Iowa & New Hampshire Why do these states go first?

National party rule, tradition, stupidity

Why do so many candidates spend so much time there? Momentum, momentum, momentum

Page 15: Presidential Primaries:

Remember this guy? Frontrunner in national

polls 2003 Moved to New

Hampshire 81% name ID 2nd place in early NH

polls Ignored Iowa

Page 16: Presidential Primaries:

Remember this guy? Frontrunner in national

polls 2003 Moved to New

Hampshire 81% name ID 2nd place in early NH

polls Ignored Iowa

Page 17: Presidential Primaries:

How about this guy? John Edwards Never considered a

frontrunner pre-’04 50% of Dems never

heard of him in 2003 “Second place” in IA

2004 (Dems don’t report votes).

Page 18: Presidential Primaries:

Or this guy? Led some national

polls in 2003 Fundraising leader =

major expectations Third place in IA The Scream Stick a fork in it

Page 19: Presidential Primaries:

The Scream People in NH reported seeing “scream” at

least 11 times prior to voting in their primary

Fox News version Crowd version

Page 20: Presidential Primaries:

Opinion in Iowa, 2003-04

0

25

50

75

21-J

an

5-F

eb

14-M

ar

29-A

pr

12-M

ay

6-Ju

n

2-Ju

l

3-A

ug

29-A

ug

14-S

ep

15-O

ct

23-O

ct

31-O

ct

9-N

ov

24-N

ov

19-D

ec

6-Ja

n

19-J

an

date

ed

gep

kerry

dean

Page 21: Presidential Primaries:

0

10

20

30

40

21-J

an

5-F

eb

14-M

ar

29-A

pr

12-M

ay

6-Ju

n

2-Ju

l

3-A

ug

29-A

ug

14-S

ep

15-O

ct

23-O

ct

31-O

ct

9-N

ov

24-N

ov

19-D

ec

6-Ja

n

19-J

an

date

How Does it Play in the Media:

Dean’s “Stunning Setback.” Iowa, 2003-04

Page 22: Presidential Primaries:

Failed frontrunner, 2008 Mitt Romney

Spent $85K p day on TV in 2007 Spent $2.5 m on TV for IA straw poll Spent another $2.4 m on mail, other ads Won Aug ‘07 IA straw poll

Earned media, earned high expectations

Page 23: Presidential Primaries:

2007 - 2008 GOP trends IA never gots Romney

traction nationally He lead in IA polls for

months in 2007 Lost IA to a guy w/ a

funny Youtube ad 34% H, 25% R, 13% Mc

End of Romney ‘08

Page 24: Presidential Primaries:

Early Momentum Many campaigns believe that performance

in early events determines their fate

“Performance” in early events defined as much by reality, as by interpretation

Page 25: Presidential Primaries:

IA, NH, and Expectations New Hampshire 1972

Ed Muskie 46% George McGovern37%

Interpretation Muskie “cried”

Page 26: Presidential Primaries:

IA, NH, and Expectations Iowa, 1976

Jimmy Carter second at 27%; B. Bayh 13% lost to “Uncommitted” (37%)

Interprentation: “Carter Defeats Bayh 2 - 1” NYT

Page 27: Presidential Primaries:

IA, NH, and Expectations Iowa, 1988

Dick Gephart 31% Paul Simon 27% Mike Dukakis 22%

Interpretation: Gephart & Simon locals, expected to do well Dukakis “strong showing”

Page 28: Presidential Primaries:

IA, NH and expectations Iowa 1984, 1988, NH 1996

Hart (D) 16% in IA 1984 Robertson (R) 25% in IA 1988 (2nd) Buchanan (R) 23% in NH 1996 (2nd, Dole 26%)

Interpretation “Hart scores upset” ....32% behind Mondale, beat

McGovern “strong second in surprise” NYT

Page 29: Presidential Primaries:

IA, NH & Expectations 1992, NH Reality

Paul Tsongas 33% Bill Clinton 24 % Bob Kerry 11 %

Interpretation Big win for Clinton, the “comeback kid” Tsongas from MA, expected to do well, Clinton expected to do

poorly

Page 30: Presidential Primaries:

IA, NH & Expectations NH 2004

Kerry 39% Dean 26% Clark 13 % Edwards 12 %

Interpretation two candidate race: Kerry v. Edwards Dean was expected to do better, Clark won in states in

wrong time zone

Page 31: Presidential Primaries:

Media influence & expectations Basis of initial expectations

standing in early polls fundraising

Beating early expectations Big shift in attention (deserved?)

Failing to meet expectations Big drop in attention

Page 32: Presidential Primaries:

Media influence & expectations How is the 2012 result being interpreted by

media What were expectations?

Who beat expectations? Who gets most media bounce?

Who failed to meet expectations?

Page 33: Presidential Primaries:

Beating expectations (Media shift) Hart 1984 37% Reagan 1976 36% Clinton 1992 35% Buchanan 28% Carter 1976 25% Huckabee 2008 21% Robertson 1988 20% Obama 2008 17%

Page 34: Presidential Primaries:

Media Shift, 2012 after IA Romney 33% pre, 37% post Paul 20% pre, 17% post Gingrich 20% pre, 11% post Perry 9% pre, 7% post Bachman 7% pre, 3% post Santorum 9% pre, 21% post Huntsman2% pre, 2% post

Page 35: Presidential Primaries:

Lessons from 2008 Early frontrunners not always strong

Polls capture name ID

Dem process = real danger of no clear winner

Frontloading doesn’t help frontrunners Instant fundraising now possible (Internet)

Page 36: Presidential Primaries:

Lessons from 2008 Could Obama have won w/o Iowa?

4 days between IA and NH

Could Huckabee have been noticed w/o Iowa

Could Obama have won w/o the Internet?

Page 37: Presidential Primaries:

Lessons from 2008 Sequence matters

IA, NH matter....too much?

The schedule matters....2012? What if NV went first? NY? WA?

What reforms?

Page 38: Presidential Primaries:

Earliest polls for 2012 The polls: Feb, April,

Dec ‘10 Palin 25%, 15%, 17% Huck 32%, 24%, 18% Rom 21%, 20%, 19%

Page 39: Presidential Primaries:

Looking back to 2007 Dem, Jan ‘07, 1 year

before IA Clinton 34% Obama 18% Edwards 15% Gore 10% Kerry 5% Bidden 3%

GOP, Jan ‘07 1 year before IA Giuliani 32% McCain 26% Gingrich 9% Romney 7% Pataki 3% Huckabee 1%

Page 40: Presidential Primaries:

Reforms Regional Primaries

National primary What if everyone voted on Feb 5th 2008

Closed primaries Rush Limbaugh, Operation Chaos

Page 41: Presidential Primaries:

Reforms Regional primary

how implement? who goes first?

Delaware Plan 10 smallest states first 10 next largest states, etc.


Recommended