Project Description:This project was developed to better support increasing levels of traffic, reduce congestion and
improve roadway safety along this stretch of SR 32. Two intersections on the Top 150 Intersections list are in the project area and will be addressed with the completion of this project. Based on the current HSIP Priority List (2017), the project would address five of the top eleven Suburban Non-Freeway Segments and three of the top 100 Suburban Intersections by eliminating three traffic
signals.
What is the requested TRAC Tier Tier I - Construction
Please identify the project mode (roadway, transit or freight):
Roadway
ODOT District District 8 County Clermont
ODOT PID 103954 Project Mode Roadway
Project Information
Application ID 2019-D08-03 Date Submitted 5/29/2019
Project Name Clermont SR 32 Eastern Corridor Segment IVa
What is the current TRAC TierTier III - Development & Multi-Phase
Projects
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 1 of 13
What Type of Application Are you Submitting?Existing TRAC Project - Tier I, II or III project seeking additional funds to advance to the
next stage of project development.
Address 505 S SR 741
City Lebanon
State Ohio Zip Code: 45036
Project Contact Charles Rowe
Phone (513) 933-6596
Email [email protected]
Project Sponsor Information
Project Name Clermont SR 32 Eastern Corridor Segment IVa
Sponsoring Agency Ohio Department of Transportation
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 2 of 13
Utility Relocation In Progress 6/1/2022
Detailed Design In Progress 11/1/2020
Right-of-way Acquisition In Progress 6/1/2022
Preliminary Engineering Studies Complete 7/8/2016
Environmental / NEPA Approval Complete 7/5/2017
Planning Studies Complete 10/31/2014
Interchange Modification Study (IMS) / Interchange Justification Studies (IJS)
Complete 7/22/2015
Project ScheduleNew projects are required to supply project milestone information. Please select the status of each milestone below as either Not Yet Started, In Progress or Completed. Additionally please enter the corresponding date for the milestone and status.
Status Date
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 3 of 13
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
New Roadways / New Alignment 0
Begin Latitude Begin longitude End Latitude End longitude
0 0 0
0 0 0
Secondary Roadway Segments
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
ODOT NLFID Begin Point End PointPrimary Roadway
SegmentSCLESR00032**C 2.25 4.5
Transportation InformationIn an effort to understand the complex issues associated with the project TRAC collects a variety of transportation related data and information in the evaluation process including: congestion data, safety data, truck traffic, and model derived transportation values; such as, cost/benefit analysis and air quality. The roadway segments associated with the application is the basis of this analysis. Transit and Freight related projects should identify the roadway segments that will receive the benefit from projects implementation.
New project applications must identify the primary roadway segment that will be improved by the project and ancillary roadways that will be improved as part of the project.
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 4 of 13
Truck Miles Traveled (TMT) Reduction Not Applicable
Existing Freight Capacity Not Applicable
Existing Freight Volume / Existing Freight Capacity Ratio
Not Applicable
Freight Capacity Increase Not Applicable
Freight Multi-Modal Project Information
Freight Type Not Applicable
Route/Number Not Applicable
Existing Freight Volume Not Applicable
Existing Peak Hour Ridership / Capacity Ratio Not Applicable
Added Peak Hour Capacity Not Applicable
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction Not Applicable
Route/Number Not Applicable
Peak Hour Ridership Not Applicable
Existing Capacity Not Applicable
Transit Multi-Modal Project Information
Transit Type Not Applicable
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 5 of 13
Please provide a brief explanation as to how this project will connect an STS resource with a local freight or transit facility or resource
0
Will the project facilitate a connection between two or more corridors or modal hubs identified on the STS?
No
Please provide a brief explanation as to how this project will facilitate a connection between two or more STS resources.
0
Will the project connect an STS resource with a local freight or transit facility or resource?
No
Strategic Transportation System (STS) Connections
The Strategic Transportation System (STS), identified as part of Access Ohio 2040 - ODOT’s long range transportation plan - stratifies Ohio’s significant transportation corridors and inter-modal hubs across Ohio. Additional information about the STS and Access Ohio 2040 can be view at the Access Ohio 2040 Website
Is the project part of an STS corridor? Yes
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 6 of 13
Warehouse 122,861
Commercial 3,791,940
Institutional 382,631
Water and Sewer Service 100%
What is the estimated square footage for the following building types within the calculated project area?
Light Industrial 490,417
Heavy Industrial -
Estimated Project Area Acreage 6,054
What is the estimated percentage of acres being served by the local services within the estimated project area calculated above?
Local Streets and Roadways 100%
Electrical Service 100%
Local Investment FactorsBuilt Out Local Attributes
Local Investment factors analysis and evaluation of the dollar value of existing, local built-out attributes such as streets, water, and land use. For this analysis TRAC has standardized the project area as a one-mile "rectangular" buffer around the primary roadway segment. Additionally TRAC also considers percentage of acres served by local services within the rectangular buffer with the following formula: (Length of the primary roadway segment in miles + 2 miles) x 2 miles x 640 acres)
What is the length of the primary roadway segment being improved by the project?
2.73
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 7 of 13
Poverty Rate Data SourceSub-County Unemployment RateUnemployment Rate Data Source
0
00
Do you want to enter distress values for a sub-county area to be used in the evaluation of this
application?
No - I want to use the information collected by ODOT.
County 0Sub-County Poverty Rate 0
What is the dollar value of committed or recent public investment in new, non-project
infrastructure within the project area? (Millions) $ 164
What is the present value of private investment in existing facilities within the project area? (Millions)
$ 450
Economic Distress - Poverty & Unemployment RatesAs part of the application scoring process, ODOT collects county level information as the standard measurement for poverty and unemployment factors; however, if a project sponsor provides defensible data at a sub-county or census tract level, TRAC can consider that level of geographic analysis for scoring and evaluation.
What is the estimated percentage of road route miles served by transit routes (excluding ADA/Para
Transit) within the project area?7%
What is the estimated percentage of existing building square footage that is currently vacant?
2%
New Local InvestmentsTRAC will consider the monetized value of public investments or commitments for new, non-project infrastructure and private investments within 5-year time horizon prior to and after the date of this TRAC Application.
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 8 of 13
-$ -$ -$ -$
Will additional TRAC funds be needed for future phases of development or construction? No
PE DD RW CO
PE DD RW CO6.25$ 1.49$ 5.00$ -$
CO Funding Request 37.85$ 2022
Total New TRAC Funding Request 61.40$
Has TRAC previously committed funding for the development or construction of this project?
Yes
DD Funding Request 0.35$ 2020
RW Funding Request 23.20$ 2020
Which phase(s) you are requesting new TRAC funding for as part of this application?
DD - Detailed DesignRW - Right-of-wayCO - Construction
Amount (Millions) Requested Fiscal YearPE Funding Request -$ 0
Project Funding PlanTRAC Funding Request
Please indicate the amount of funding being requested by phase and fiscal year. Funding requests should consider the funding that will be needed with the next two fiscal years.
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 9 of 13
Local Funding TotalsPE DD RW CO
-$ 0.20$ 4.63$ 31.34$
PE DD RW CO-$ -$ -$ 19.00$
-$ -$ 4.63$ 8.30$
Local funding Source (5) OKI
Local funding Source (4) Clermont County TID
PE DD RW CO
PE DD RW CO-$ -$ -$ 0.10$
-$ 0.20$ -$ 0.10$
Local funding Source (3) Union Township
Local funding Source (2) Clermont County Engineer
PE DD RW CO
PE DD RW CO-$ -$ -$ 3.84$
Will local funding sources be used in the development or construction of this project? Yes
What is the total number of local funding sources for the development and construction of this project? 5
Local funding Source (1) Clermont County Conveyance/CIC
Local Funding CommitmentsProject Development and construction can be funded with multiple local funding sources. The questions below will help identify the funding sources for this project.
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 10 of 13
% Local % ODOT % OTIC % TRAC28.5% 13.0% 0.0% 58.5%
Total Local Total ODOT Total OTIC Total TRAC36.17$ 16.50$ -$ 74.14$
Funding Totals 6.25$ 2.04$ 32.83$ 85.69$
Total Project Cost 126.81$
New TRAC Funding -$ 0.35$ 23.20$ 37.85$
Future TRAC Funding -$ -$ -$ -$
OTIC Bond Funding -$ -$ -$ -$
Previous TRAC Funding 6.25$ 1.49$ 5.00$ -$
Local Funding -$ 0.20$ 4.63$ 31.34$
ODOT / Earmark Funding -$ -$ -$ 16.50$
Funding Summary
PE DD RW CO
PE DD RW CO-$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ 16.50$
OTIC Turnpike Bond Revenue Funding
Have Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission (OTIC) Revenue Bonds been committed for the No
ODOT Program or Earmark Funding Commitments
Will funding from another ODOT program or legislative earmarks be used in the development or Yes
PE DD RW CO
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 11 of 13
Date of Inflated Estimate 9/15/2021
Year of Inflation Estimate 2019
Railroad $ -
Contingency $ 9.40
Total Estimate $ 86.00
Traffic Control $ 3.50
Structures $ 8.30
Retaining Walls $ 5.30
Tier I Construction Estimate
Projects requesting Tier I status are required to submit a budgetary construction estimate. Additionally estimates must be inflated to the anticipated year of construction.
Roadway $ 51.60
Drainage $ 7.70
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 12 of 13
District Acknowledgement
Has the appropriate ODOT District Planning Office been contacted about the development and construction of this project?
Yes
Has the ODOT District Office provided a letter or support or acknowledgment for this project? Yes
Attachments
Is this project within the boundaries of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)? Yes
Please identify the respective MPO. OKI
Has the MPO provided a letter or support or acknowledgment for this project? Yes
MPO & District AcknowledgementMPO Acknowledgement
Processed: 6/6/2019 2019 TRAC Funding Application 13 of 13
INFRA GRANT Appalachian Opportunity Corridor, Ohio SR 32 Total Project Cost: $118,531,225
Charlie RoweRectangle
Charlie RoweRectangle
£¤50£¤50
Randolph5.4
Kanawha5.1
Greenbrier5.1
Hardy5.5
Fayette6.5
Preston5.2
Boone6
Roane7.7
Logan7.1
Webster5.9
Lewis5.9Ritchie5.2
Monroe4.5Mercer6.2
Wirt7Grant5.6
Pocahontas6.2
Raleigh5.3
Nicholas6.5Wayne6
Clay8.3
Pendleton3.6
Mingo7.8
Braxton6.6Mason6
Wood5.4 Tucker5.3
Lincoln6.9
Hampshire4.2
Jackson5.4
Wyoming7
Wetzel6.7Tyler6.7
Gilmer6.3
McDowell6.9
Harrison4.6
Upshur5.5
Putnam4.9
Marion8.5
Cabell4.7
Mineral5.6Barbour5.9
Summers5.5
Berkeley4.1
Marshall5.5
Calhoun9.8
Monongalia4 Morgan4.3Taylor4.7
Jefferson3.4
Ohio4.8
Pleasants6.2
Brooke6.2
Hancock6
Ross4.5
Stark4.8
Knox4.3Darke3.9 Licking3.9
Scioto6.6
Pike6.5Adams7
Gallia6.1
Wayne3.6Allen4.4
Butler4.1
Brown5.3
Clark4.5
Logan3.7 Union3.4
Athens5.6
Hardin4.3
Franklin3.7Noble6.7
Mercer2.7
Miami3.8 Belmont5.5Preble4
Highland5.5
Monroe7.9
Carroll5.2Shelby3.7
Clinton5.2Warren3.8
Holmes3.2
Greene4
Guernsey5.5
Hancock3.4
Pickaway4.2
Coshocton6.1
Putnam3.3
Harrison5.1
Van Wert3.5
Champaign3.8
Perry5.4
Meigs7.1Vinton6.1
Fairfield4
Muskingum5.2
Marion4.5
Richland4.8
Washington5.5Morgan6
Madison3.7
Morrow4.4
Fayette4.1
Ashland4.5
Hocking4.9
Jackson6.5Clermont4
Tuscarawas4.5Delaware3.3
Lawrence5.5
Auglaize3.3
Hamilton4.1
Wyandot3.2 Columbiana5.2
Crawford5.2Mahoning5.9
Montgomery4.4
Huron5.8 Medina4.2 Summit4.6Portage4.5
£¤50
¬«32¬«32
¬«32
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and theGIS User Community
Corridor D Appalachian Highway
LegendCorridor D Appalachian HighwayState Boundary
Unemployment Rate3.9% or Lower4.0% - 4.5%4.6% - 6.0%6.1% or Higher
Pennsylvania
VirginiaKentucky
From: Robert Koehler Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:46 AM To: Rowe, Charles Subject: RE: CLE 32 TRAC OKI acknowledges and supports ODOT’s TRAC application for TRAC app for CLE 32 IVa. This application would request the remaining funds to complete phases 4-10 making SR32 a free flow corridor with an overpass at Glen Este-Withamsville and an interchange at Bach Buxton Road. OKI has invested nearly $30,000,000 in corridor projects completed or in progress including SR-32 interchange at I-275, Eastgate Blvd, Aicholtz Connector, Aicholtz Road roundabouts, Clepper Lane, Old SR 74 (Stonelick to Armstrong), Old SR 74 (Schoolhouse to Glen Este-Withamsville). This project will continue the systematic regional improvements to address safety, mobility and commerce in this thriving area of western Clermont County. Robert Koehler, P.E. Deputy Executive Director OKI Regional Council of Governments
From: Robert Koehler Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:46 AM To: Rowe, Charles Subject: RE: CLE 32 TRAC OKI acknowledges and supports ODOT’s TRAC application for TRAC app for CLE 32 IVa. This application would request the remaining funds to complete phases 4-10 making SR32 a free flow corridor with an overpass at Glen Este-Withamsville and an interchange at Bach Buxton Road. OKI has invested nearly $30,000,000 in corridor projects completed or in progress including SR-32 interchange at I-275, Eastgate Blvd, Aicholtz Connector, Aicholtz Road roundabouts, Clepper Lane, Old SR 74 (Stonelick to Armstrong), Old SR 74 (Schoolhouse to Glen Este-Withamsville). This project will continue the systematic regional improvements to address safety, mobility and commerce in this thriving area of western Clermont County. Robert Koehler, P.E. Deputy Executive Director OKI Regional Council of Governments
From: Spinosa, StefanTo: Rowe, CharlesSubject: RE: TRAC letterDate: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 2:30:35 PMAttachments: image002.png
image003.png
Charlie, Thank you for your email notifying ODOT of your intention to submit a TRAC application for theEastern Corridor Segment IVa project. This is an important project for our District, and I appreciate your efforts in advancing it. Respectfully, Stefan C. Spinosa, P.E.Capital Programs AdministratorODOT District 8 Capital Programs505 South SR 741, Lebanon, Ohio 45036513.933.6639transportation.ohio.gov
From: Rowe, Charles Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 12:51 PMTo: Spinosa, Stefan Subject: TRAC letter Stefan, Just a reminder I need a letter/email from you stating the support D8 has for the CLE 32 TRAC app. Thanks, Charlie Rowe, P.E.Senior Project Manager/Design Build CoordinatorODOT District 8505 South State Route 741 Lebanon, OH 45036(p)513.933.6596transportation.ohio.gov
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.dot.stat.oh.us/mailto:[email protected]://transportation.ohio.gov/
2019-D08-03APP-D08-03
77123009_trac_2019_project_map77123010_ohiowvunemployment77123011_support_letter_from_oki77123013_support_letter_from_oki77123014_odot__trac_letter