81
Kirsten Lupinski, Patricia Jenkins, Audrey Beard, & LaTasha JonesEducational Foundations, Summer-Fall 2012
Kirsten Lupinski is a professor in the Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation and Patricia Jenkins and Audrey Beard are professors in the Department of Teacher Education, all at Albany State University, Albany, Georgia. LaTasha Jones is a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Middle-Secondary Education and Instructional Technology in the College of Education at Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
OneofthemajoroutcomesoftheeducationalreformmovementintheUnitedStatesduringthepastdecadehasbeentheincreasedfocusontheprofessionalpreparationofeducators(Darling-Hammond,1997).AccordingtoSand-ersandRivers,numerousstudiesindicatethateducatorsmakeasignificantdifferenceintheirstudents’education(1996).Inresponsetotheincessantcallstoimproveandassureeducatorquality,theeducationprogramsatAlbanyStateUniversityadoptedaconceptual framework thatintegratesstate,national,andprofessionalstandardsintoitseducationpreparationprograms.Assuchastandards-basedpreparationapproachwasdevelopedtoempowerfutureprofessionaleducatorswhograduatefromAlbanyStateUniversity. TheconceptualframeworkatAlbanyStateUni-versityconsistsofmultipleformsofknowledge,drawnfrommanydisciplinesandsources,includingresearch,
Reflective Practicein Teacher Education
Programsat a HBCU
By Kirsten Lupinski, Patricia Jenkins,Audrey Beard, & LaTasha Jones
82
Reflective Practice in Teacher Education Programs at a HBCU
best practices, historical and cultural perspectives, the learning communityofeducationpractitionersandprofessionalandcommunityvalues.Onetenetoftheconceptualframework isthegoalofareflectivetransformativepractitioner.Thisprincipleisbasedontheassumptionthattheknowledgethatsupportsourprogramisdynamicandcontinuestoevolveasinquiryandresearchaboutteachingandlearningareestablished. TheevolutionofreflectioninteachingandteachereducationcanbetracedbacktoJohnDeweywhousedtheideaofthescientificmethodtoscaffoldhowpeoplethinkandlearn.Deweymadeatremendousimpactoneducationandhowteachersusereflectioninordertoincreasetheirpersonalandprofessionalexperiences.Hedefinedreflectionas“turningasubjectoverinthemindandgivingitseriousandconsecutiveconsideration,therebyenablingustoactinadeliberateandintentionalfashion.Reflectioninvolvesactive,persistentandcarefulconsideration”(DeweyascitedinSweigard,2007). SincetheinceptionofDewey’slaboratoryschools,reflectionhasbecomeamajorcomponentforprogramsthatprepareeducators.Reflectioncanbearichsourceofcontinuedpersonalandprofessionalgrowth.Thisprovidesanopportunityforprofessionalstorenewandrevivetheirpractice.Educatorsgaininformationabout their teaching from their own observations of themselves, coupled withtheirownreflections(Paulson&KennethcitedinSweigard,2007).Reflectionisagiftprofessionalscanusetogrowfromexperiences.Throughreflection,profes-sionalsdevelopcontextspecifictheoriesthatfurthertheirownunderstandingoftheirworkandgenerateknowledgetoinformfuturepractice.Whenaneducatorengagesinmeaningfulreflection,conclusionscanbedrawnthatprovideinsightforfutureinstruction.Theprimaryemphasisistoprepareeducatorstocreatelearningenvironmentsthatareconducivetotheteachingandlearningprocesswhichwillpositivelyimpactstudentachievement. In order to become a reflective transformative practitioner, one must firstunderstand what a reflective practitioner is and what transformation means.Atransformativeleaderengagesinreflectionandaction.Thereforeinorderforaneducatortobecomeatransformativeleader,theymustfirstlearntheimportantskillofreflection.Thenextsectionofthisarticlewilldescribetheconceptofreflectionandtheconceptoftransformationindependently.TheseindependentdefinitionswillprovideafoundationforthecombinationofthetwoconceptsthatareusedintheteacherpreparationprogramatAlbanyStateUniversity.
What Is a Reflective Practitioner? Ingeneral,reflectionusesthepasttoinformourjudgment,reflectonourex-periencesandfacenewencounterswithabroaderrepertoireofinformation,skillsandtechniques(Killion,Joellen,Todnem,&Guy,1991).Whenyoureflectonwhathasoccurredandconsequentlychangeyouractionsyouwillhopefullyexperienceadifferentoutcome.Therearenumeroustheoristswhoaddresshowreflectionisusedineducation.Onetheorist,DonaldSchon,describestwodifferenttypesof
83
Kirsten Lupinski, Patricia Jenkins, Audrey Beard, & LaTasha Jones
reflection:Reflection-on-ActionandReflection-in-Action.Reflection-on-Actionoc-curswhenateacherreflectsontheirdailylessonsandclassroomactionsandusestheinformationgatheredtoadjusttheirlessons/teaching(Killion,Joellen,Todnem,&Guy,1991).Thegoalofthisformofreflectionisforeducatorstobecomemoreeffectiveandconscientiousteachers.Thistypeofreflectionisreflectingbackonlessonsthathavebeentaughtandisaskillthatteachersneedtoacquireintheirearlyteachingexperiences. ThesecondtypeofreflectionthatSchondescribesisReflection-in-Action.Thistypeofreflectionoccursduringteachingandinvolvesactingimmediatelytoimproveorbetteryourteaching.PaulsonandKennethdescribethedifferencebe-tweenthesetwotypesofreflection;ifateacherthinksreflectivelyaboutanepisodeofteachingafterclass,heorsheengagesinreflecting-on-action.Incontrast,iftheythinkabouttheepisodewhileinthemidstofteaching,thenreflection-in-actiontakesplace(Paulson&KennethascitedinSweigard,2007). Schon’sreflectiontheoryhasbeenusedasafoundationforseveralresearchers.Killion,Joellen,Todnem,andGuy(1991)usedSchon’stwotypesofreflection(reflec-tion-on-actionandreflection-in-action)andaddedathirdtype(reflection-for-action).Reflection-for-actionisstatedasthedesiredoutcomeofSchon’sreflection-in-actionandreflection-on-action.Thistypeofreflectionlooksatwhathasoccurredinthepastandhowthiscanhelpchangeourteachingprocessinthefuture.Consequentlythiswillprovidestudentswithanenrichedlearningenvironment.Anexampleofreflec-tion-for-actionintheclassroomiswhenateachercritiqueseventsfromthepastandmakesaconclusionorjudgmentthatthatwillimpactfutureteachings/lessons. Valli(1997)statesthattherearesixcomponentsofateacher’sknowledgethatguidehowtheyteach:behavioral, technical, reflection-in-action, reflection-on-ac-tion, deliberative, personalistic, and critical.Allofthese(exceptbehavioral)involvetheconceptofreflection.Thebehavioralapproachinvolvesskillsacquisitionandassessmentbyeducationfacultyandcooperatingteachers.Theassessmentwillin-dicatewhatbehaviorsthestudentneedstoaddress.ThefiveotherwaysincorporatetheconceptofreflectionwhichisanexpansionofSchon’soriginalconcepts.Thefirst,technicalreflection,involvestheteachercandidate’sreflectionoftheirownperformanceandexhibitsinternalmotivationtobetterthemselves.Reflection-in-actionandreflection-on-actionarethesecondwaysthatValliidentifiesandtheyhavepreviouslybeendescribed.Thethirdtypeofreflection,deliberativereflec-tion,involvestheconsolidationofseveralsourcesofinformationfromavarietyofperceivedexpertsastheteachermakesdecisionsaboutpractice(Killion,Joellen,Todnem,&Guy,1991).Personalisticreflectionrequirestheteachertodrawlinksbetweentheirprofessionalandpersonallife.Inessence,howdoesbeingateacherfulfilltheirpersonallifegoals(Killion,Joellen,Todnem,&Guy,1991).Thefinaltypeofreflectioniscriticalreflectionanditgoesbeyondthepersonandlooksattheinstitutionandpoliticalaspectsofeducationandsocialinjustices. EbyandKujawa(1998)describesixcharacteristicsofthereflectivepractitio-ner:
84
Reflective Practice in Teacher Education Programs at a HBCU
•Reflectivepractitionersareactive—theysearchenergeticallyforinforma-tionandsolutionstoproblemsthatariseintheclassroom.
•Reflectivepractitionersarepersistent—theyarecommittedtothinkingthroughdifficultissuesindepthandcontinuingtoconsidermatterseventhoughitmaybedifficultortiring.
•Reflectivepractitioners are careful—theyare concerned for self andother,respectingstudentsashumanbeingsandtryingtocreateapositive,nurturingclassroom.
•Reflectivepractitionersareskeptical—theyrealize that therearefewabsolutesandmaintainahealthyskepticismabouteducationaltheoriesandpractices.
•Reflectivepractitionersarerational—theydemandevidenceandapplycriteriainformulatingjudgmentsratherthanblindlyfollowingtrendsoractingonimpulse.
•Reflectivepractitionersareproactive—theyareabletotranslatereflectivethinkingintopositiveaction.
EbbyandKujawa(1998)alsocameupwithsiximportanttraitsthatareflectivepractitionershouldpractice:(a)Understandtheprocessofreflection-on-action;(b)Gobeyondmeredescriptionoflessons(thewhat?);(c)Learnaboutreflectionthroughinteractionwithteachereducators,cooperatingteachersandfellowpre-serviceeducators(throughjournalbuddyreading);(d)Learntoreflectonlearnersandthelearningprocessesaswellasthecontent;(e)Learntointegrateideasfromothers and experiences to improve teaching; and (f)Understand that reflectivepractitionersareactive,persistent,careful,skeptical,rationalandproactive. Onewaythesesixtraitscanbeaccomplishedordevelopedisthroughthepro-cessofreflectivejournalwriting.Theliteratureclearlystatesthatreflectivejournalwritingforstudentteachers/studentsundertakingtheirfieldworkexperienceisakeycomponenttobecomingaskillfulreflectivepractitioner.Journalwritingneedstogobeyondjustdescribingaroomsetuportalkingaboutthedifferentstudentsintheroom.Davis(2006)describesthedifferencebetweenproductiveandunproduc-tivereflection.Unproductivereflectionismainlydescriptivewithoutverymuchanalysis,usuallylistingideasratherthanconnectingideas.Productivereflectionislikelytopromoteeffectivelearningandinvolvesquestioningassumptionsandseeingthingsinavarietyofdifferentways.Areflectivejournalneedstoaddressthedailylessonandactivities;whathappened,whatchangescouldbemade,howyoucouldimprovethelesson,anyquestionsorissuesthatoccurredintheclassroomandhowyouaddressedthemorhowyoucouldhaveaddressedthem. In essence, onemust gobeyond just describing the lesson and include ananalysisofwhatcouldhavebeendonedifferently,makingconnectionswithotherexperiencesandunderstandinghowtointerpretateachingidea.Sweigard(2007)
85
Kirsten Lupinski, Patricia Jenkins, Audrey Beard, & LaTasha Jones
statesthatteachersgaininformationabouttheirteachingfromtheirownobserva-tionsofthemselvescoupledwiththeirreflections.Thereforeareflectivejournalisalogicalfirststepinassistingateachercandidateinprogressingintoanexemplaryfutureteacher. Teachereducatorsmusttakeastakeinensuringthattheirteachercandidateshavethemeansandopportunitytodevelopthevaluableskillofreflection.Alongwithrequiringreflectivejournalwritingasapartoftheassessmentofstudentteachers,teachereducatorsmustalsomodelhowreflection-on-actionandreflection-for-actionwork.Teachereducatorscanbeassistedinthisendeavorbyincorporatingactionresearchintotheircourses.Thistypeofresearchinvolvesthesamecyclesofplan,act,observeandreflectthatreflectiondoes(Liston&Zeichner,1990). Teacherasaresearcherisoftenusedsynonymouslywithactionresearch.Althoughdifferencesexistbetweenthesetwoparadigmsregardingthetypeandlevelofresult-ingaction,theyaresimilarinthatteachersperformresearchaboutthemselves,theirstudents,classrooms,administration,parentsandcommunityforthesolepurposetoimproveteaching,learningandtheinstitution(DelCarlo,Hinkhouse,&Isbell,2010).Thisconceptcanbeusedtoincorporateanassessment/actionresearchcomponentintothestudentteachingexperience.Wherestudentteachersaretheresearchersinwhichtheyresearchandreflectontheirdailylessons/teachings. Thecriticalrolethattheteachereducatororcooperatingteacherplaysistoassiststudentteacherstobesuccessfulinengaginginreflectivepractices.NolanandHuber (1989)state that theaimsofsupervision(teachereducator)are: (1)engagingtheteacherintheprocessofreflectivebehaviorwhile(2)fosteringcriti-calinquiryintotheprocessofteachingandlearning,thereby(3)increasingtheteachersunderstandingofteachingpracticeand(4)broadeninganddeepeningtherepertoireofimagesandmetaphorstheteachercanutilizetodealwithproblems.Byincorporatingstudents’reflectionswiththeirownreflectionsandconsideringthestabledataprovidedbytheparticipant-observer,teacherswereabletobetterunderstandclassroomevents(Nolan&Huber,1989). Therearenumerouspositiveoutcomesthatteacherscanseewhentheyengageinreflection;increaseintheirteachingandlessonplanning,increaseinself-es-teem,havegreatercontroloftheirteachingpractice,greaterbeliefthattheycaninfluencestudentlearning,greaterinterestingatheringdataandinformationontheirteachingandanincreaseinencouragingtheirstudentstoengageincriticalthinkingpractices.CruickshankandApplegate(1981)statethefollowing;reflectiveteachinggivesstudentstimetothinkcarefullyabouttheirownteachingbehaviorsandanopportunitytoviewotherexperiencesofprofessionalsinaction.Teachersfind themselves engaged in ameaningful processof inquirywhich leads themtowardrenewedself-esteemandinterestinteaching.Asaresult,teachersbecomemorereflectiveaboutteachingandmoreinterestedinself-improvement.Reflectiveteachingisanopportunityformeaningfulteachergrowth.
86
Reflective Practice in Teacher Education Programs at a HBCU
What is a Transformative Practitioner? Reflectionisattherootofbecomingatransformativeleader.Throughresearchopportunities,readings,reflection,dialogueandcollaboration,teachersexplorenewideasanddifferentperspectives,addressingfundamentalepistemological,culturalanddevelopmentalissues.Astheystudy,reflect,anddiscusschallengesintheirownclassrooms,andexploretheirroleasprofessional,teachersgainnewperspectivesonteachingandstudentlearningthatleadthemtomakecriticalchangesintheirclassrooms(DeMulder,Cricchi,&Sockett,2001).Thesecondaspectofdefiningatransformativereflectivepractitioneristounderstandwhatatransformativeleaderis.TransformativeleadershiphasbeendescribedbyFreire(1991)asacontinuousloopofreflectionandaction.Teacherswhoputthisintopracticenotonlybecometransformativeleadersandmastertheskillofreflection,butalsoearnthetrust,respectandpraiseoftheirstudentsandpeers.Atransformativeleaderintheclass-room(teacher)cantransformtheirclassroomintoademocraticandempoweringlearningspacethroughengagingincriticalreflection,dialogueandcollaboration(View,DeMulder,Kayler,&Stribling,2009). Becomingatransformativeleaderandreflectivepractitionerisnotsomethingthathappensovernight.Teachercandidatesshouldbetaught theseskillsduringtheircourseworkandthenrefineandadaptthemintheirownprofessionalpractice.Transformativeleadershipisnotwieldingauthority,butratherisaboutempoweringstudentstobeactiveparticipantsinademocracy.Thisteacher’sclassroombecomesaspacethatembracescriticalinquiry,creativity,imagination,andcollaboration(View,Demulder,Kayler,&Stribling,2009).Inessence,theteachersarecreatinganenvironmentthatnotonlyempowersstudentstotaketheirownlearningintotheirhands,butalsogivesthemtheopportunityandskillstointeractwithotherstudentsandthelargercommunityinordertocreateanenvironmentthatstimulateslearning.Transformative teachersare reflectivepractitioners thatareconstantlydevelopingnewwaysofteachingandlearningandconsequentlypassingtheseskillsandbehaviorstotheirstudentsinordertobettertheirlearningopportunities.
Methods and Purpose TheCollegeofEducationfacultyatAlbanyStateUniversitysoughttoim-provethecomponentsofitsConceptualFramework.Thus,researchersconductedasystematicliteraturereviewofonecomponent—thereflectivepractitioner.Theresearchersrecognizedthatsimplyprovidingopportunitiesforteachercandidatestoreflectwouldbeinsufficientandunproductive.Consequently,oneofthecollege’scriticalgoalswastoproduceteacherswhocouldbalancecontentknowledgewithtransformingdecisions. The researchers explored the literature on reflective-transformative prac-titioners to confirm the college’s former conceptual framework and to addevidence-basedweight to a revisedConceptual Framework.Utilizing a basic
87
Kirsten Lupinski, Patricia Jenkins, Audrey Beard, & LaTasha Jones
researchmethodologyofdiscoveryandinterpretation,theresearcherssoughttofindtrendsintheliteraturethatmayapplytothecollege’steachercandidates.Inaddition,theresearchersanticipatedthatathoroughliteraturereviewwouldrevealattitudinalandbehavioralresponsesofreflectivepracticessimilartothoseofthecollege’steachercandidates.Thus,theliteraturereviewwouldprovideinsightfulknowledgetoguidethedevelopmentoftheoriesusedtoreviseonecomponentofthecollege’sconceptualframework. Theauthorssought tohighlight the inherentconnectionbetweenreflectiveteachingandtransformativeevents.Becausepublicschoolsaremirrorimagesofthesociety,anationlookstoitseducationalsystemtodefineandsolveitsproblems.Forthisreason,teachersmustbepurposeful,reflectivepractitionerswhoareequippedtotransformsocietalillsthrougheducatingthemasses.ThisistheultimategoalfornotonlytheteacherpreparationprogramatAlbanyStateUniversity,butallteacherpreparationprograms.
Applications of Reflective Transformative Practice at Albany State University AlbanyStateUniversity’sCollegeofEducationhasformulatedfiveunitstan-dardsforits’conceptualframeworkthataddressthecharacteristicsofareflectivetransformativepractitioner:
1.Demonstratesunderstandingandtheabilitytoselect,construct,andusevarioustypesofformalandinformalassessmentinstruments,andmakeinstructionaldecisionsaboutstudentlearninganddevelopment.
2.Demonstratesunderstandingandtheabilitytocommunicatestudents’progresstootherprofessionalsandparents.
3.DemonstratesunderstandingandtheabilitytoapplyNational,State,University/College,andprofessionalstandardstopositivelyimpactstu-dentlearning.
4.Demonstratesunderstandingandtheabilitytoreflectonprofessionalprac-tices,developaplanforprofessionalgrowth,andimplementthatplan.
5.Demonstratesunderstandingandtheabilitytoconstructresearch-basedinquiryandusethefindingstopositivelyimpactstudentlearning.
Initially,JohnDewey’sdefinitionofthereflectiveprocessbecamethecatalystforcollaborativediscussionsinstructuringdescriptorsfortheunit’sreflectivetransfor-mativepractitioner.Deweydefinedreflectionas“Turningasubjectoverinthemindandgivingitseriousconsideration,therebyenablingustoactinadeliberateandintentionalfashion.Reflectioninvolvesactive,persistentandcarefulconsideration”(DeweyascitedbySweigard, 2007,p.1).Thus,theunit’sdescriptorsincludeallaspectsofthecomplexactivitiesanddemandsoftheteachingandlearningprocess.Standards1and4begantoemergefromthisthought.Inaddition,thedescriptorsmustencompassasystematicmeanstojudge‘consecutiveconsideration’inorder
88
Reflective Practice in Teacher Education Programs at a HBCU
‘toactinadeliberateandintentionalfashion.’Standardstwo,three,andfivefollowDewey’sdefinitionofreflection. Second,theworkofPauloFreire(1993)influencedthedevelopmentoftheunit’sstandardsforthereflectivetransformativepractitioner.Freire(1993)empha-sizedthateducationwasadialoguethatinvolvedrespect—notonepersonactingonanother,but ratherpeopleworkingcollaboratively.Dialoguewasmore thandeepeningunderstanding,itledinpart,tomakingadifferenceintheworld(Smith,2002).Freire’stheoreticaldescriptionofpraxis(acontinuousloopofreflectionandaction)wasactionbasedonreflectionwithcertaininherentqualities.Theseincludedcommitmenttohumanwell-being,thesearchfortruth,andrespectforothers.Itwouldalwaysberisky,requiringwiseandprudentpracticaljudgmentabouthowtoactinthissituation(Smith,1999). Tosupporttransformativepractices,theunit’sprogramsincludecollaborativeteachingandlearningprocesses,performance-basedfieldandclinicalexperiences,reflection,content-knowledgemastery,instructionaltechnology,culturalsensitivity,peeranalysis,andaccountability(Lu&Ortlieb,2009).Theunitpromoteshabitsofthemindthatepitomizedemocraticdispositionstopositivelyimpactstudentlearning,toempoweracommunityoflearners,andtoexactneededchangesforthis society. Third,thecontributionsofSchon(1983)shapedtheconnectionbetweentheunit’sreflectivetransformativestandardsandindividualprogram’stheoriesandpractices.Aspreviouslystated,Schoncontributedtwotypesofreflectiontotheeducationfield.Aneducatormustdevelopbothskillssothattheirtheoreticalknowledgewillmergewithpracticalapplications.Inaddition,athirdtypeofreflection,reflectionforaction.Thiswillbecometheultimateaimfortheprevioustypesofreflectionand away toguide future andmorepractical purposes.Theuniversity facultyconsideredValli’spersonalistic reflectionandcritical reflectionwhendesigningtheunit’sstandardsforreflectivetransformativepractitioner(1997). Thepersonalisticreflectionwouldcompelpractitionerstoexaminetheirownper-sonalidentitiesandtheimpactthiswouldhaveonthepersonallivesoftheirstudents.Valli(1997)arguedthatthistypeofreflectionaddressedtheEurocentricbackgroundsofmanypractitionersassignedtoeducateadiversepopulationofstudents.Similarly,criticalreflectionsentailedthesocial,moral,andpoliticalcomponentsofeducationasaninstitution.Thistypeofreflectionwouldscrutinizesocialinjusticesandtheresolutionofsaidinjustices(DelCarlo,Hinkhouse,&Isbell,2009). Thus, the cognitive and affective aspects of reflecting persuaded the unit’sreflectivetransformativestatements.Thestatementswouldobligepractitionerstoperformdeliberateandcarefuljudgmentsabouttheirownpersonalgrowthandtheirrelationshipswithstudents.Practitionerswouldbeduty-boundtoexaminetheirskillstoguidereflection-in-actionandreflection-on-action.Finally,theunit’sstatementsprovideabalancetoencouragepractitionerstoexercisereflection-for-action. Astheuniversityfacultymadeprogramdecisions aboutin-classandout-of-classassignments,werecognizedsimplyprovidingopportunitiestoreflectwouldbeinadequatebecausereflectionmaynotbeproductive.Thus,programswithin
89
Kirsten Lupinski, Patricia Jenkins, Audrey Beard, & LaTasha Jones
theunitstructuredcourse-specifictaskstobecompletedduringfieldandclinicalexperiences.Theselevel-specifictaskswouldenhancepre-serviceandin-serviceteachers’progressiontowardsbalancingcontextknowledgewithdisciplinedjudg-mentforteaching,learning,andproblem-solving(Minott,2010).Likewise,in-classassignments,suchaslessondemonstrations,collaborativeinquiryprojects,andpeerevaluations,weredesignedtopromoteananalyticalapproachtoreflection-in-actionandreflection-on-action.Moreover,theuniversityfacultyfocusedontheaffectiveaspectsofareflectivepractitioner. Reflectionistheimpetusofareflectivetransformativepractitioner.Reflectionrequiresconstantandcontinualclassroomobservation,evaluation,andsubsequentaction.Whenbecominganeffectiveteacherit’simperativetounderstandthe“why’s,“how’s” and “what if’s” of the teaching-learning process.This understanding isgarneredthroughtheconsistentpracticeofreflection,aswellaslearningthroughexperiences. Tostrengthenrelationswithpartnerschools,candidatesshouldbeplacedinschoolsinlargenumbersduringfieldexperiencesandstudentteaching.Candidatesplacedinpartnerschoolsinadequatenumbersshouldbeabletoexactchangeduringthereflectivetransformativetransitionbeginningwithinitialfieldobservationsandculminatingwithstudentteaching.Thefollowingaresomeexamplesofactivitiesthatpromotereflectionandengagecandidatesinthereflectiveprocesswhichin-clude:interviews,reflectivejournaling,lessonplans,instructiontools,videotapedlessons,professionalportfolios,skillmasteryprojects,simulations/roleplaying,andactionresearch.
Interviews Aspartoftheapplicationadmissiontoteachereducation, allstudents wereinterviewedbythechairofteachereducation.Therewerespecificquestionsaskedandratedduringtheinterview.Thescoreontheinterviewsuggestedthestudent’sabilityforsuccessinthedepartment.Theinterviewwasdesignedtohelpthemreflectontheirneedsandexperiencesastheymatriculatedthroughtheprogram.ThiswasalsoanopportunitytoreviewGeorgiaAssessmentCertificationExami-nation(GACE)withstudents.Suggestionsfromthechairofthedepartment wereprovidedonthebeststrategiesforpreparingtosuccessfullypassingtheGACEContentTest.
Reflective Journaling Thereflectivejournalprocessisinitiatedduringthefirsteducationalclass.Thereflectivejournalculminatesinthefinalcourse,studentteaching.Students/candidatesalsoreflectondifferentexperiencesduringallfieldexperiences.Students/candi-datesarerequiredtorecordactivities,thoughts,observations,feelings,incidentsandquestionsintheirjournals.Thereflectivejournalcanbeusedtodescribesitu-ations/events,andwhattheylearnedfromvariousexperiences.Students/candidatesareexpectedtoenhanceobservationalandcommunicationskills,explorefeelings,
90
Reflective Practice in Teacher Education Programs at a HBCU
andassessprogress.Thejournalingprocessshoulddenotegrowthovertimeasthestudent/candidatesmatriculatethroughtheteachereducationprogram.
Lesson Plans Candidatescompletelessonplansinallmethodcourses.Alllessonplansmustfollowtheguidelinessetforthbythedepartment.Thelessonplanshouldincludeavarietyofinstructionalstrategiessupportedbyresearchtoimproveteachingandlearning.Candidateswillbeabletoreflectontheeffectivenessofthelesson.
Instruction Tools Candidates are required to develop instruction tools to enhance prek-12learning.Candidatesmustselectasubject/specificskillanddesignaninstructiontooltoteachskillstoyoungchildren.Candidateswillutilizetheinstructionaltoolduringfieldexperiences/studentteaching.Candidateswillreflectonhowstudentsinteractedwiththetooltodeterminethetool’seffectiveness.
Videotaped Lessons Candidatesareaskedtovideotapethemselvesteachingalesson.Thiscanbeintheclassroomorasimulation.Thecandidatesviewandlistentothetapeforthepurposeofanalyzinginstructionandstudents’responses.Thecandidatescanalsoreviewquestioningstrategiesandmonitorwaittimeandtransitions.Thecandidatescandeterminewhatwasdonewell in the lessonandwhatshouldchange.Thisreflectioncomponentcouldguidereteachingthelesson.
Professional Portfolio Theprofessionalportfolioisinitiatedduringtheinitialeducationcourses.Theprofessionalportfolioculminatesinthestudentteachingcourse.Specificartifactsareassignedtoeachclass.Students/candidatescompletetheassignmentsforinclu-sionintheportfolio.Theprocessofcreatingandselectingartifactsforinclusionintheportfoliorequiressignificantreflectivethinkingaboutone’sselfasateacherandgrowthovertime.TheportfolioshouldbealignedwithINTASC(InterstateNewTeacherAssessmentandSupportConsortium)andGPS(GeorgiaProfessionalStandards) andperformancestandardsforstudentteaching.
Skill Mastery Projects Theskillmasteryprojectisacomponentoftheportfoliofulfilledduringthestudentteachingcourse.Candidatesarerequiredtoselectasubjectandspecificskillintheclassinwhichtheyareinstructing.Thecandidateswilldevelopandadministerapretest.Thecandidatewillteachtheskillusingvariousinstructionalstrategies.Thecandidateswillthendevelopandadministeraposttest.Thecandidateswillcompleteacolorcodedbargraphdepictingthepretestandposttestscores.Thischartshouldshowifstudentstookstudentsfromnotknowingtoknowingtheskill.Candidatescanreflectonwhatwasdoneeffectivelyandwasdoneineffectively.
91
Kirsten Lupinski, Patricia Jenkins, Audrey Beard, & LaTasha Jones
Simulations/Role Playing Simulationscanbeusedtoprovideafertilelearningenvironmentforstudents.Candidatessimulateanactivitythatisreal.Theysimulatetheactivitysowellthereislittledifferencebetweenthesimulatedenvironmentandtherealone,andthesamekindoflearningexperiencecantakeplace.Simulationsarehands oninvolvingstudentssotheybecomeparticipants.Studentslearnbetterfromtheirownexperi-encesthanhavingothers’experiencesrelatedtothem.
Action Research Candidatesarerequiredtoidentifyasituation/problemnotedintheirclassroom.Candidatesutilizeallofthecomponentsofactionresearchtosolvetheproblem.Oncedataiscollected,dataisusedtoprovideinformationaboutwhatcanbedonetoimprovestudentlearningandteacherperformance.
Conclusion Incorporatingtheconceptofreflectionintoteachereducationprograms,preparesteachersforalifetimeofreflectingonbestpracticesthatimpactstudentachieve-ment.Astheauthorshavestated,therearevariouswaysinwhichreflectioncanbeincorporatedintoteacherpreparationprograms.Eachuniqueclassandprogramshoulddecidewhichmethodofreflectionworksbestwiththecourseconceptsandobjectivesof.Therefore,thepurposeofthisresearchwasnottorateorevaluatethemethodsofreflection,rathertoprovideexamplesofreflectionbeingusedintheeducationfieldandatAlbanyStateUniversity. As evident by this article, the teacher education program atAlbany StateUniversityincorporatesreflectivepracticesintoitsclasses.Theimplicationsthatthishasforfutureteacherswillimpacttheirpracticeinactualclassrooms.Whenstudentsaretaughttobereflectiveinvariousformatsforvariousreasons,thehopeisthatthispracticewillcontinueintheteachingclassroom.Theimplicationsforthispracticewillincludegreatersuccessinstudentachievementandteacherpractice.
ReferencesCruickshank,D.R.,&Applegate,J.H.(1981).Reflectiveteachingasstrategyforteacher
growth.Educational Leadership,38(7),553-554.Davis, E.A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary
teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,22,281-301.Darling-Hammond,L.(2000,January).Teacherqualityandstudentachievement:Areview
ofstatepolicyevidence.Educational Policy Analysis Archives,8(1),Retrievedfromhttp://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
Del Carlo, D., Hinkhouse, H., & Isbell, L. (2010). Developing a reflective practitionerthroughtheconnectionbetweeneducationalresearchandreflectivepractices.Journal ofScience Education and Technology,19,58-68.
DeMulder, E. K., Cricchi,A., & Sockett, H. (2001). Complexity in morally grounded
92
Reflective Practice in Teacher Education Programs at a HBCU
practice.InH.Sockett,E.DeMulder,P.LePage,&D.Woods.(Eds),Transforming teacher education: Lessons in professional development(pp.89-104).Westport,CT:Bergin&Garvey.
Eby,J.W.,&Kujawa,E.(1998). Reflective planning, teaching and evaluation: K-12(3rd
ed.).UpperSaddleRiver,NJ;Merrill-PrenticeHall.Freire,P.(1991).Pedagogy of the oppressed.NewYork:Continuum.Killion,J.,Joellen,P.,Todnem,&Guy,R.(1991).Aprocessforpersonaltheorybuilding.
Educational Leadership,48(6),14-16.Liston,D.P.,&Zeichner,K.M.(1990).Reflectiveteachingandactionresearchinpreservice
teachereducation.Journal of Education in Teaching,16(3),235-255.Lu,L.,&Ortlieb,E.(2009).Teachercandidatesasinnovativechangeagents.Current Issues
In Education, 11(5).Retrievedathttp://cle.edu.asu.edu/volume11/number5/.Minott,M. (2010).Reflective teaching, selfandcopingwithnegative in-school factors.
Current Issues in Education,13(1).Nolan,J.,&Huber,T.(1989).Nurturingthereflectivepractitioner throughinstructional
supervision:Areviewoftheliterature.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(2),126-145.
Sanders,W.,&Rivers, J. (1996).Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement(Researchprogressreport).Knoxville,TN:Universityof Tennessee Value-Added Assessment Center. Retrieved from http://mdk12.org/practices/ensure/tva/tva_2.html
Smith,M.(1999).Praxis: An introduction to the idea plus an annotated booklist.Retrievedathttp://www.infed.org.
Smith,M.(1997,2002).Paulo Freire.Retrievedathttp://www.infed.org.Sweigard,T.(2007).Becomingareflectivepractitionerasapreserviceeducator.E-Journal
for Student Teachers and New Teachers,1(2),1-8.Valli,L(1997)Listeningtoothervoices:AdescriptionofteacherreflectionintheUnited
States.Peabody Journal of Education,72(1),67-88.View,J.,DeMulder,E.,Kayler,M.,&Stribling,S.(2009).Cultivatingtransformativeleadership
inP-12 schools and classrooms through critical teacher professional development.JournalOf Curriculum and Instruction,3(2),39-49.