16
Supreme Court Interpretation of Rights 2.1 – Daily Sheet 1

2.1 day 1 ppt

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Supreme Court Interpretation of Rights

2.1 – Daily Sheet 1

Page 2: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Video Clip

What can we infer about Malcolm’s characterization of African Americans as illustrated by his example? What does this

dichotomy illustrate? Does it “integrate” or “alienate”?

Page 3: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Do Now

Bill of Rights: 1st 10 Amendments of the US Constitution

Infringe: to do something that does not obey or follow (a rule, law, etc.)

Page 4: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Learning Objective

Equal Protection of the Law How has the Court applied the 14th

Amendment’s equal protection clause to the issue of discrimination?

Page 5: 2.1 day 1 ppt

What is 14th Amendment?

Adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws, and was proposed in response to issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War.

Page 6: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Meaning of Equal Protection

Equal Protection: state and local governments cannot draw unreasonable distinctions among different groups of people. 14th Amendment forbids any state to

“deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.”

Page 7: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Rational Basis Test

Rational Basis Test: A low form of review that determines whether a classification of persons has a rational basis and does not deny equal protection under the Constitution Courts will uphold a state law when the state can

show a good reason for a classification. Wisconsin v. Mitchell (1993): upheld state law

that imposes longer prison sentences for people who commit “hate crimes” (the “good reason” for discriminating against hate criminals was to discourage hate crimes)

Page 8: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Suspect Classification

Suspect Classification: A classification made on the basis of race or national origin. It is “subject to strict judicial scrutiny” Example: Blacks must ride at the back

of the bus

Page 9: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Fundamental Rights

Fundamental Rights: are the right to travel freely between the states, the right to vote, and 1st Amendment Rights The Court will give close scrutiny to

state laws that deal with fundamental rights

Page 10: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Discrimination

Discrimination: individuals treated unfairly solely because of their race, gender, ethnic group, age, physical disability, or religion It is illegal but sometimes difficult to

prove.

Page 11: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Washington v. Davis (1976) Supreme Court ruled that to prove a

state guilty of discrimination, one must prove that an intent to discriminate motivated the state’s action. 2 African Americans sued Washington DC’s

Police department’s requirement that all recruits pass a verbal ability test. More whites passed than blacks.

“14th Amendment guarantees equal laws, not equal results.”

Page 12: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Struggle for Equal Rights

Racial discrimination: treating members of race differently simply because of race

Segregation: separation of people from the larger social group

Jim Crow Laws: by the 1800s states used these to segregate blacks from whites

Page 13: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Struggle for Equal Rights

Page 14: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Struggle for Equal Rights

Page 15: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Struggle for Equal Rights

Page 16: 2.1 day 1 ppt

Struggle for Equal Rights