I think CSH might provide a good lens for investigating corruption in sports such as doping.

My issue is the desire to link data between the PBS & MBS - Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medicare Benefits Schedule. Despite the value in this linkage, it has not been mandated, legislated or implemented by govt. Stakeholders include data owners, legislators, health bureaucrats, health providers, funders, etc, ... and the patients who will benefit greatly.

Mine is around the movement of Systems Program Office (SPO) personnel into one of six Centres of Expertise (CoE). Boundaries are not clear for how SPOs will continue to manage staff when the CoE will hold the budget for training and potentially task and manage performance of staff allocated to them.

I think this approach would be useful in Machinery of Government changes ('mogging') underway to build the Digital Transformation Agency - vastly different cultures and ways of working need to be taken into account. The organisation's outcomes also need to be determined.

My problem is the challenge in introducing new (but as yet undeveloped) safeguarding legislation for PWD. As it currently stands the NDIA is only considering applying the new legislation for providers registered with the NDIS for people with disability who have an eligible plan for services. This leaves a significant gap in services for any person with disability who receives services such as employment services, schools, hospitals, etc. As evidenced on recent 4 Corners programs there are many people in PWD lives who have no restrictions on their current practices and that PWD are more than 3 times more likely to be subjected to abuse.

The challenge for me is that the safeguarding legislation covers anyone involved in providing services to PWD.

My issue is around the restructuring of system program offices within Defence as part of a First Principles Review where CASG has contracted an organisation to do a rationalisation but has mandated the methodology of data collection and analysis.

The ACT Government is building a light rail network. Stage 1 of the project is from the City to Gungahlin in the north. This 12km tram line will cost at least $939 million. This involves cutting all the trees in the Northbourne Avenue median strip, as well as causing traffic disruptions for the next two years during construction. Support for the Project is varied within the Canberra community. It would be useful to analyse this challenge by answering Ulrich's 12 boundary questions.

My topic is looking at the systems in involved in sustaining and maintaining complex military material. There can be up to 14 contracts required to gt a fighter, ship, submarine etc. into the field, and each contractor can blame the other for a failure of the capability isn't where it needs to be, when it needs to be there and in the right configuration. ON top of that each Contractors has a number of sub-contractors and third parties in their set.

CSH for addressing problems and challenges

CBR Cohort 3 insights