Upload
l-h
View
95
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DATA ANALYSIS FOR ALL STUDENTS
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 2
AGENDA OBJECTIVES
Agenda and Objectives
• Teaching Context• Data Analysis for All Students• Data Analysis for Subgroups of
Students• Data Analysis for One Student
Compare examples of a written teaching context to determine characteristics of a strong submission
Identify requirements for academic analysis in the Data Narrative
Compare various graphs, charts, and tables to determine best practices for displaying student data
Compare various summaries and explanations to determine best practices for describing student data
Describe relationships between various measures of student performance
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 3
All Students: Rubric & Assessment Template
This is in your Handout
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 4
Read Kip’s All Students Section. Consider Questions Below.
1) What is one strong feature of the graphics Kip displays?
2) What is one strong feature of the write-up that Kip drafted?
3) How did Kip complete the “All Students” section according to directions in the assessment template?
Click ahead when you’ve read the
appropriate section of the Sample Data
Narrative
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 6
Strong Features of the Graphics?
1) Graphics are accurate—they correctly display the information
2) Graphics are accessible—they are well-labeled, readable, and easy to interpret
3) Graphics are informative— they provide more information than the write-up alone
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 7
Strong Features of the Write-Up?
1) Write-up is accurate—it correctly describes the results
2) Write-up is accessible—it is comprehensible, uses everyday language, follows from the graphs (no tangential tirades) and follows the graphs (doesn’t precede them)
3) Write-up is informative—it provides more information than the graphs alone
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 8
Did Kip Fully Complete the All Students Section?
1) Students’ learning, relative to the PG & AG
2) All students’ academic achievement, displayed relative to the PG & AG
3) Distribution of academic performance for all students
4) Kip’s perspective on whole-class results
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 9
How Did Kip Learn to Create Those Graphics?
The “Additional Resources” section of
this module has published tutorials for each of the graphics in
Kip’s sample Data Narrative.
© Relay Graduate School of Education. All rights reserved. 10
All Students Section: 3 vs. 4
Kip didn’t analyze high/low
performers influence on
overall achievement.
Kip didn’t connect his
perspective to formal academic
literature.