Upload
khang-vo
View
1.002
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A market landscape, research and analysis about the ed
Citation preview
e-EDUCATION
Education in the Web 2.0 Era
Final Presentation
Khang, Vinay, Jacque, Tomas & Santi
Introduction
Classroom Education
Distance Learning
e-Learning
e-Education
CHANGING LANDSCAPE
• More universities (both public & private) opening up to the idea of E-content
• Consumers are more willing than ever to learn from non-traditional sources
• ‘Education’ is one of the top market segments expected to grow rapidly from Web 2.0 and Mobile perspective
• Giants such as ‘Apple’ is focusing on sealing its position through iPad, iBooks and iBooks Author offerings
• Governments showing interest in technology aided education
PARADIGM SHIFT
Technology
Internet Speed: 35MBps
Great Cloud Computing
Infrastructure
Video Streaming
iPad/Tablet
Tools
Self-authoring/teaching tools
• School students
• College graduates
• Professionals • Enthusiasts
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Training Academies | Authors | Publishers | Certification bodies
e-Education Platform and its Implications
Business Models
e-EDUCATION
Paid Subscriptions Open & Free
i. Access to entire website
ii. Buy specific courses
• Varied access levels• Monthly/Half-
yearly/yearly subscriptions
• Institutional buy package
• Distribution through Youtube, Vimeo etc
• Distribution through dedicated portals
• Funded by philanthropic funds
Business Issues
e-EDUCATION
Paid Subscriptions Open & Free
• Pricing – Profitability
• Scalability • Credibility • Relevance
• Sustainability • Conflict of
Interest • Credibility
• University/graduate/PhD StudentsCustomers
• Education degree/diploma/certificate
• Classroom lectures, Laboratory learning
Product• Discussions – Teacher talks more• Learning Process – Whole class
participation• Emphasis – more on What, not How• Teacher’s role – Authority• Location – Classroom/School• Lesson Structure – Teacher-
dictatedBusiness Process
Part
icip
an
ts FacultyColleges and UniversitiesEducation board
Info
rmati
on Student
informationCurriculumRelevant coursesUni Knowledge path for degrees
Tech
nolo
gy University
information systemInstructional systemsMultimedia
WCA: Traditional Learning
• Anyone who:• Has internet access• Eager to learnCustomers
• Online certifications/degrees• Online classes/courses through web portalsProduct
• Discussions – Students talk as much• Learning Process – In groups or
individual• Emphasis – more How, less What• Teacher’s role – Directs to the info• Location – No fixed location• Lesson Structure – Group-dictated
Business Process
Part
icip
an
ts Course LecturersSystem designersWebsite developersWeb administrators
Info
rmati
on Student
informationOnline CoursesKnowledge path is determined by student
Tech
nolo
gy Web-based
technologiesCommunication technologies (blogs, wikis, DBs)
CAAEPSS
WCA: e-Education
Competitive RivalryMedium - High
Threat of Substitute Products
Medium - High
Threats of New Entrants
Medium - High
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Low-Medium
Bargaining Power of BuyersMedium – High
(IT)Low – Medium
(niche)
e-Education : Porter’s 5
Forces Analysiso Lack of
academic network
o Content scalability
o Establishment of reputation
o Young marketo Young demand
o Classroom education
o Training institutions
o Private tutoring
o Low (Niche subjects)
o Medium/High (IT, Design)
Evolution
Timeline
Market Landscape
Location
Unique Visits
e-Education on Policy
Affected Players
Focus on
Policy e-Education
Quality
Educators Developers
Access
StudentsNGOs, Private Players
Conclusion
“e-Education should not be viewed as just a product, an identifiable artifact of learning objectives, contents and
interactions. e-Education as a product is of uncertain value until it is deployed in a context that includes its users, technical & organizational attributes ” ~ Dr. John Eklund, 2003