12
Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling Ethno-Measurement and Ethno-Scaling Obstacles in Community Based Research with Indigenous Populations Joseph E. Trimble, PhD Center for Cross-Cultural Research Department of Psychology Western Washington University

Ethno-Measurement and Ethno-Scaling Obstacles in Community Based Research with Indigenous Populations

  • Upload
    gjcpp

  • View
    503

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Ethno-Measurement and Ethno-Scaling Obstacles in Community Based Research with Indigenous Populations. This is a narrated PPT file. To hear the audio, download the file and play the slide show. The contents are owned by the authors, and shared through the Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice (http://www.gjcpp.org/).

Citation preview

  • 1. Ethno-Measurement and Ethno-Scaling Obstacles in CommunityBased Research with Indigenous PopulationsJoseph E. Trimble, PhDCenter for Cross-Cultural ResearchDepartment of PsychologyWestern Washington UniversityEthno-measurement and Ethno-scaling

2. THEMENever look for a psychologicalexplanation unless every effortto find a cultural one has beenexhausted. - Margaret Mead (1959, p. 16) quoting William Fielding Ogburn, one of her mentors at Columbia University.Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 3. DEFINITIONCultural equivalence refers "to theproblem of whether, on the basis ofmeasurements and observations,inferences in terms of some commonpsychological dimension can be made indifferent groups of subjects" (Poortinga,1983, p. 238).Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 4. Cultural Measurement Equivalence Concepts functional equivalence; conceptual equivalence; stimulus equivalence; linguistic equivalence; and metric equivalence.*Best Practices in Human Resources, Issue 653, September 30, 1999.Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 5. Response Styles of Culturally Different Respondents(1). Not all cultural groups judge, evaluate, and assess stimuliin a linear manner;(2). The number of salient choice options can vary fromindividual to individual both within and between societalgroups;(3). Responses are difficult for some because they dont yetunderstand what the collective will accept;(4). The conventional psychometric format common to paperand pencil tests and instruments may not work in all culturaland ethnic groups; and(5). The need to capture information through a paper andpencil approach may be inconsistent and unrelated to emicstyles of information sharing (Trimble & Lonner, 1993). Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 6. Measurement is the Assignment ofNumbers to Objects,Stevenss (1946, 1951) representational view isalmost universally followed and accepted. Thisview holds that measurement is the assignment ofnumerals or numbers to objects, or, strictlyspeaking, attributes of objects according to aconsistent rule (Stevens 1951). The crucial pointis that this definition presumes measurementrather than defines what has to be fulfilled toconstitute measurement. The manifest data areimmediately seen as being measures.Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 7. Burden of Problems of IncomparabilityCross-cultural psychologists contendthat, comparing elements from differing societiesleads to inadmissible distortions of reality(Kobben, 1970, p. 584).Our own categories of explanation anddefinition, embedded in our psychologicaltheories, may not be appropriate when projectedon some other culture(Price-Williams, 1975, p. 23).Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 8. Malinowskian DilemmaMalinowski was most insistent that every culture beunderstood in its own terms, that every institution beseen as a product of the culture within which itdeveloped. It follows from this that a cross-culturalcomparison of institutions is essentially a falseenterprise, for we are comparing incomparables(Goldschmidt, 1966, p. 8).social facts are functions of the social system ofwhich they are a part; therefore they cannot beunderstood when they are detached (Durkheim,1960, p. 133). Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 9. Interpretive and Procedural CategoriesJohnson (1998) identified 52 types ofmeasurement equivalence. He pointed out(that) in no other field of inquiryhas thisseemingly elementary concept (equivalence)been assigned as many alternative meaningsand disaggregated into as many componentsas in the field of cross-cultural research (p.2). Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 10. Approaches to Comparing Behavior Across CulturesDemonstrate that the behaviors to be compared are functionally equivalent in the cultures. Existing categories and concepts then can be appliedto the behavior systems in a tentative way.The imposed etic must be modified so that it becomesan adequate description from within each culturebeing studied. With a derived etic in hand, measurement tools andtechniques can be devised that meet the standardsfor cultural equivalence.(after Berry, 1969)Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 11. Response Intervals1 ? 2 ? 3 ? 4 ? 5 ? 6 ? 7Are the intervals between choice alternatives equal?Its assumed theres an integer difference butwhat is the role of subjective culture?Ethno-measurement and Ethno-scaling 12. Ethno-Measurement and Ethno-Scaling Obstacles in CommunityBased Research with Indigenous PopulationsJoseph E. Trimble, PhDCenter for Cross-Cultural ResearchDepartment of PsychologyWestern Washington UniversityEthno-measurement and Ethno-scaling