15
EVALUATING OER QUALITY – A CLOSER LOOK Open Education Conference 2013 OSPI OER PROJECT Barbara Soots Digital Learning Department Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction [email protected]

Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Washington state legislature found that the recent adoption of Common Core standards provided an opportunity for the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to identify a library of current, high-quality, openly licensed courseware that could be accessed by K-12 school districts statewide. The question of quality is one of the overriding issues in the OER field. To address that issue, Washington state has developed a process for evaluating Common Core-aligned OER materials. In April 2013, groups of math and ELA educators convened to review OER materials in Algebra 1 and select ELA units. Results of this review as well as all the review tools are available to share as districts consider utilizing open resources. This session will cover the rubrics, process, and outcomes used in the evaluation process.

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

EVALUATING OER QUALITY – A CLOSER LOOK

Open Education Conference 2013

OSPI OER PROJECT

Barbara SootsDigital Learning Department

Office of Superintendent of Public [email protected]

Page 2: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

CC BY Rhino Roadblock by Chris Ingrassia http://www.flickr.com/photos/andryone/445139454/in/photostream/

POTENTIAL ROADBLOCKS

Finding target resources

Access and security issues

District policies that don’t recognize OER as an option

Evaluating quality and alignment

Page 3: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

“The legislature finds the state's recent adoption of Common Core K-12 standards provides an opportunity to develop a library of high-quality, openly licensed K-12 courseware that is aligned with these standards.”

CC BY NC Washington State Capitol – Olympia by MathTeacherGuy http://www.flickr.com/photos/mathteacherguy/

WASHINGTON K-12 OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES PROJECT

Page 4: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

WHY REVIEW OER?

Help educators select high quality materials

Provide information for materials adoptions

Identify gaps in Common Core alignment

digitallearning.k12.wa.us/oer

Page 5: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

WHAT OER TO REVIEW?

Unlimited access and redistribution

Permission to adapt

Defined content area and grade band scope

Page 7: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

CCSS Worksheet

Publishers’ Criteria

EQuIP Rubrics

Achieve OER Rubrics

Reviewers Comments

HOW TO EVALUATE QUALITY?

Page 8: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

Math: 5-9 hours per curriculumEach reviewer assigned 3-4 math courses

ELA: 3-5 hours per unitEach reviewer assigned 8 units

30-40 hours total effort

CC BY hourglass by gingertammycat http://www.flickr.com/photos/99027078@N00/

EVALUATION TIMEFRAME

Page 9: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

Focus strongly where the standards focus

Coherence: Think across grades and link to major topics within grades

Rigor: In major topics, pursue with equal intensity: conceptual understanding, procedural skill, and application

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS: Big Shifts in Math

Page 10: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

Building content knowledge through content-rich nonfiction

Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational

Regular practice with complex text and its academic language

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS: Big Shifts in ELA

Page 11: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

OER REVIEW REPORT

https://digitallearning.k12.wa.us/oer/review/2013/report/OSPI_OER_Report_2013.pdf

“CCSS aligned OER are emerging platforms for mathematics curricula. They show significant promise as a viable selection in the future but are still evolving and not yet mature.”

“Educators can reliably consider many of the OER ELA units that were reviewed for use in their classroom and be confident that the units can be reasonably adapted to meet the CCSS…”

Page 12: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

NEXT STEPS

Grant program for adaptation and/or implementation ofreviewed material

Request for Proposals

New OER review cycleGeometry/Integrated Math 29th-10th grade ELA units

Page 13: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

Share metadata about quality resourcesLearning Registry

Establish commonalities in defining qualityAchieve Student Achievement Partners

Work towards giving educators a deeper understanding of who owns copyright and encourage open licensing

CONSIDERATIONS FOR WIDE-SCALE SHARING OF RESOURCES

Page 14: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

WA OER Review results and library of materials: http://digitallearning.k12.wa.us/oer/library/

Full report from 2013 review: http://digitallearning.k12.wa.us/oer/review/2013/report/summary.php

OER Communication Toolkit: https://digitallearning.k12.wa.us/oer/resources.php

EQuIP: http://www.achieve.org/EQuIP

Achieve OER: http://achieve.org/oer-rubrics

Student Achievement Partners Achieve the Core: http://www.achievethecore.org/

CCSS Publisher’s Criteria: http://www.corestandards.org/resources

Washington law re: OER: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=28A.300.803

Achieve OER Policy Brief:http://www.achieve.org/files/OERInstitutePolicyBriefFINAL1.pdf

RESOURCES

Page 15: Evaluating OER Quality - Open Education Conference 2013

OSPI OER Website: http://digitallearning.k12.wa.us/oer

Twitter: waOSPI_OER

Email: [email protected]

CONTACT INFORMATION