Upload
ivo-grigorov
View
62
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Open Scholarship (Open Science, Open Educational Resources) delivers directly to individual researcher`s objectives for impact and tenure evaluation, to the research institutions` objectives on innovative education and excellence research, so can Graduate Schools afford not to train all future graduates in "Open" practices alongside research excellence?
Citation preview
Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua Research Secretariat
Open Science?@OAforClimate
ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk
linkedin.com/in/ivogrigorov
by default in Doctoral Schools
FUNDERS: National & EC
Academic Staff
Today`s Graduate Student
Scientist of Tomorrow
Project Managers
INSTITUTIONS
KnowledgeManagers
Join the experiment:
www.fosteropenscience.eu@fosterscience
#fosteropenscienceUn. Helsinki, 20 Oct 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
12
3
3 reasons to make Open Science part of excellence
training:
Multiply Collaborations
Stronger Research Profile
Greaterfunding success
How do YOU measure the success
of YOUR doctotral school?
Number of PhD`s?
Publication?
Career Chances ?
Dr. Alan Leshner, CEO AAAS & Publisher of ”Science” journal
#esof2014 pic.twitter.com/M9D0rVtggI24/06/2014 16:53
@ fosterscience
"Focus on Impact (Factor) distorts what matters in science”
"The currency of researchers is really about making sure their
work can be read and can be cited”
Robert Kiley, Wellcome Trust
”Researchers job is to change the world, not get
tenure”Dr. Mike TaylorESOF2014Should Science Be OPEN?
“Open science is the umbrella term of the movement to make scientific research,
data and dissemination accessible to all levels of an inquiring society,
amateur or professional.”
Source: Wikipedia, Aug 2013
Un. Helsinki, 20 Oct 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
“Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, et al. (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
IDEA &PROPOSAL
TESTS
DATA
MODEL CODE
ARTICLES
IdealisedResearchLifecycle
Peer-review& DOI
Impact Factor (IF)
OpenEducationalResources
Source: Peng 2011, Science 334, pp1226 http://www.stodden.net/AMP2011/slides/pengslides.pdf
Problem 1: reproducibility
Un. Helsinki, 20 Oct 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
Importance (x axis) and ease of access for % universities and colleges (x
axis)Source: “Transitions in Scholarly Communications - a Portfolio of Research Projects,
Research Information Network,” 2011.
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/transitions-scholarly-communications-portfolio-res
Problem 2: Access to research(by universities!)
Quality Research Outputs: articles, books or other research outputs.65%Impact: in the form of case studies which demonstrate a distinctive social, economic or cultural impact outside academia.
Research Environment: the quality of the environment within which the research is conducted.
20%15%
Source: UK HEFCE, www.hefce.ac.uk/
Problem 3: future REF criteria
Un. Helsinki, 20 Oct 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
Source: Horizon2020, Marie Curie ETN Evaluation Process, 2014
“Weakness in EXCELLENCE: Involvement of different sectors is limited, with no non-academic beneficiaries”
“Weakness in IMPACT: highly focussed on academic activities, and lacks an advanced communication strategy”
“Weakness in IMPLEMENTATION: limitied exposure to non-academic partners & infrastructures”
Excellence
Impact
Implementation
“Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, et al. (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
IDEA &PROPOSAL
TESTS
DATA
MODEL CODE
ARTICLES
Idealised
Research
Lifecycle
Open Notebook
ScienceDataCenter
Data PublicationDOI
Publish CodeDOI
DOIREF
IMPACT
OpenEducational Resources
Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
1. Excellence:ObjectivesRelevance to WorkProgramConcept & ApproachAmbition min 3/5 POINTS
2. Impact:Expected impact to WorkProgramMaximise Impact (Open Access & Open Data) min 3/5 POINTS
3. Implementation:Workplan & ManagementConsortium & Resources min 3/5 POINTS
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247
2. IMPACT (min 3/5 points):2.1 Expected impact to WorkProgram
- expected impacts set out in the work programme
- delivering innovations to the markets - socially important impacts
2.2 Maximise Impact (Open Access & Open Data)- plan for results dissemination and
exploitation- research data management for
verification & re-use- knowledge strategy management & Open
Access
… for public and societal engagement!
Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247
How do you Implement ?
3 Nov 2014: Get funds for OS training in 2015 www.fosteropenscience.eu
Spring 2015: Join the UNESCO-Foster Workshop towards a Roadmap for Doctoral Schools in ERAwww.fosteropenscience.eu
20 Oct 2014: Meet people at www.openaccessweek.org
Sept 2015: Combine paper writing, science comm & Open Science in a PhD course, accredited by ECTS
25 Nov 2014: Join the Open Science and Research Forumhttp://web.csc.fi/csc/kurssit/arkisto/openscienceforum
Jan 2015: Join us in the proposal to the Nordic eScience Globalization Iniative (NeGI)
Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua Research Secretariat
@OAforClimate
ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk
linkedin.com/in/ivogrigorov
Need FurtherTrainingon Open Science in
Horizon2020?
Join the Open Science experiment at
www.fosteropenscience.eu
Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua Research Secretariat
@OAforClimate
ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk
linkedin.com/in/ivogrigorov
Thank youfor your attention!
Join the Open Science experiment at
www.fosteropenscience.eu