16
UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA COLLAGE OF LAW, GOVERNMENT AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES GFPS 3043 GFPP2403 ORGANISATIONAL LEADERSHIP POWER, Authority & Influence in Organizational Leadership PRIDHIVRAJ NAIDU 127445

Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

Citation preview

Page 1: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA

COLLAGE OF LAW, GOVERNMENT AND

INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

GFPS 3043

GFPP2403ORGANISATIONAL

LEADERSHIP

POWER,Authority & Influence in

Organizational Leadership

PRIDHIVRAJ NAIDU 127445

Page 2: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

POWER IN ORGANISATION

PowerPower may be regarded as the ability to determine the behavior of others or to decide the outcome of conflict where there is disagreement.

It is likely to be resolved according to the relative resources of power available to

the participants. (Tony Bush, 2003)

Page 3: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

InfluenceInfluence represents an ability to affect outcomes and depends on personal characteristics and expertise. (Tony Bush, 2003)

Authority Authority is legitimate power which is vested in leaders within formal organizations. (Bolman

and Deal,1991)

Page 4: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

POWER IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP

5 sources of power that leaders should draw on within organizations:

1. Legitimate power 2. Reward power 3. Coercive power

4. Expert power 5. Referent power

Page 5: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir
Page 6: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

The 5 Sources of powerTun Mahathir

1. REFFERENT POWERReferent power based on desires others

have to identify favorably with us or with what we symbolize to them.

Tun M; Foreign PolicySouth Africa - Apartheid (1948-1994)1987 Tun M- boycott CHOGM1989 Malaysia hosted Kuala Lumpur Declaration proposed Suspension of South Africa

Page 7: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

The 5 Sources of power Tun Mahathir

2. LEGITIMATE POWERLegitimate power is an officer believing that the

orders being given are true, even if they may be coming from a higher power that does not normally give out orders. (Brandi Rivera, 2006)

Operation Lalang;October 1987, detention of 105 political leaders, civil activists, prominent citizens on the basis of civil disruption and seduction on direct orders from the Prime Minister, Dr.M.

(The Star; 28 Oct 1987; Retrieved 12 Sept 2010)

Page 8: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

The 5 Sources of powerTun Mahathir

3. EXPERT POWER• Expert power comes from experience or

education. (Darek Kleczek, 2008)

-Almost 40yrs of political career: 1963-2003 -Experience in various fields: Minister of

education, International Trade, Deputy PM, consequently PM for 22 yrs

-Education: a doctor by profession -Writer: of 15 titles, beginning with

The Malay Dilemma(1970) till Chedet.com(2008)

Page 9: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

The 5 Sources of power Tun Mahathir

4. REWARD POWERReward power is who employee believes that

they are going to get some type of reward for doing their job or by following their supervisor order.(Brandi Rivera, 2006)

Rebirth of UMNO,UMNO Baru – after 1988 crisis:Tan Sri Datuk Seri Mohamed B Haji RahmatSingel handedly worked on & established UMNO (baru)He was reinstated as the information minister (1987-

1999) & subsequently Malaysian ambassador to Indonesia

Page 10: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

The 5 Sources of power Tun Mahathir

5. COERCIVE POWERCoercive power is a supervisor pursued an

employee to do their work or they can be fired or demoted.(Brandi Rivera, 2006)

Cabinet Reshuffles:Over 22 yrs as PM: 8 major Cabinet

Reshuffles.During which Tun removed 36 Full ministers

from any cabinet posts.

Page 11: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

INFLUENCE IN ORGANISATIONAL LEADERSHIP

9 general tactics in trying to influence others: (Angelo Kinicki and Brian K. Williams)

Tactics Explanation

1. Rational Persuasion -Trying to convince someone by using reason, logic, or facts.

2. Inspirational Appeals -Trying to build enthusiasm or confidence by appealing to others’ emotions, ideals, or values.

3. Consultation -Getting others to participate in a decision or change.

Page 12: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

INFLUENCE IN ORGANISATIONAL LEADERSHIP

Tactics Explanation4. Ingratiating Tactics -Acting humble or friendly or making someone feel good or feel

important before making a request.

5. Personal Appeals -Referring to friendship and loyalty when making a request.

6. Exchange Tactics -Reminding someone of past favors or offering to trade favors.

7. Coalition Tactics -Getting others to support your effort to persuade someone.

8. Pressure Tactics -Using demands, threats, or intimidation to gain compliance.

9. Legitimating Tactics -Basing a request on one’s authority or right, organizational rules or policies, or express or implied support from superiors.

Page 13: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

7 differences between authority and influence(Bacharach and Lawler ,1980)

AUTHORITY INFLUENCE

•Authority is the static, structural aspect of power in organizations.

•Influence is the dynamic, tactical element.

•Authority is the formal aspect of power. •Influence is the informal aspect.

•Authority refers to the formally sanctioned right to make final decisions.

•Influence is not sanctioned by the organization and is, therefore, not a matter of organizational rights.

Page 14: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

7 differences between authority and influence(Bacharach and Lawler ,1980)

AUTHORITY INFLUENCE

•Authority implies involuntary submission by subordinates.

•Influence implies voluntary submission and does not necessarily entail a superior subordinate relationship.

•Authority flows downward, and it is unidirectional.

•Influence is multi-directional and can flow upward, downward, or horizontally.

•The source of authority is solely structural.

•The source of influence may be personal characteristic, expertise, or opportunity.

•Authority is circumscribed, that is, the domain, scope, and legitimacy of the power are specifically and clearly delimited.

•Influence is uncircumscribed, that is, its domain, scope, and legitimacy are typically ambiguous.

Page 15: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

CONCLUSION

• Power, influence and authority are the most important aspect in organization leadership.

• It prevails as the administration of leaders that lack any one of it may collapse easily under pressure or problem.

• Leaders, like Tun Mahathir whom has had and used all of the sources of power, authority & influence, had everybody to follow his mode of leadership.

Page 16: Organizational Leadership - Case Mahathir

THANK YOU

By: PRIDHIVRAJ NAIDU