Upload
informa-australia
View
290
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Prof. Andrew Parkin delivered the presentation at the 2014 University Governance and Regulations Forum. The 2014 University Governance and Regulations Forum examined key developments in the Higher Education legislative and regulatory framework and how these changes impact the governance of Australian universities. For more information about the event, please visit: http://bit.ly/unigove14
Citation preview
Maintaining Quality Standards
in a Commercialised Market
University Governance and Regulations Forum
17 September 2014
Andrew Parkin
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Disclaimer:
The perspective presented in this presentation is that of the
presenter and should not be attributed to Flinders University
Five propositions about the recent and emerging
Australian higher education environment
Proposition 1:
The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
Proposition 1:
The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
Proposition 2:
The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
Proposition 2:
The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
Proposition 2:
The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
Proposition 3:
Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
Proposition 3:
Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
Proposition 3:
Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 5:
The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.
Proposition 5:
The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.
Proposition 5:
The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.
The five propositions …
1. The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
2. Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
3. The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
4. The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
5. The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.
The five propositions …
1. The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
2. Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
3. The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
4. The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
5. The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.
Proposition 1:
The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
Proposition 1:
The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
• Intense competition is not new
Proposition 1:
The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
• Competition has long been based on such
factors as:
– reputation/brand
– institutional academic/course profile
– geographical accessibility
– admission pathway accessibility
– capacity constraints on admission numbers
– personal connections (e.g. alumni, friends)
Proposition 1:
The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
• Competition has long been based on such
factors as:
– reputation/brand
– institutional academic/course profile
– geographical accessibility
– admission pathway accessibility
– capacity constraints on admission numbers
– personal connections (e.g. alumni, friends)
– price? How much difference will this one
additional factor make?
Proposition 2:
The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
Proposition 2:
The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
• Not so in SA.
Proposition 2:
The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Wei
gh
ted
Ave
rag
e A
TAR
Cu
t-o
ff
Co
mm
enci
ng
En
rolm
ents
Year
Weighted Average ATAR Cut-offs and Commencing Enrolments for Bachelor Pass and Direct Hons Courses
2008-2014
CommencingEnrolments
ATAR Cut-off
Proposition 3:
Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
Proposition 3:
Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
Proposition 3:
Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
Proposition 3:
Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
How to tell TEQSA that you have a library:
(Flinders University re-registration submission 2012)
Proposition 4:
The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
Proposition 5:
The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.
Proposition 5:
The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.
The five propositions …
1. The Australian HE system is entering an
unprecedented era of intensified competition.
2. Deregulating price and provider status will induce
higher quality.
3. The current numerically uncapped but price-rigid
system has induced a ‘race to the bottom’.
4. The winding back of TEQSA’s regulatory regime will
facilitate innovation and higher quality.
5. The proposed relaxation of AQF compliance in the
threshold standards signals a more sensible quality
assurance regime.