Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Re / Search
Research is never ending process ….
Ready to face the problems
An easiest way to solve the problem is to solve it….
Regular research papers are a description of our own research
Decide the research area and make the survey
A survey paper is a service to the scientific community
Survey provides the scientific information, Instead of reading
100 + research papers [1 Survey Paper = 100 Research Papers ]
When picking papers to survey or read - try to
S. No Description
1 Pick a recent survey of the field
2 Pick a paper that you can easier understand
3 Pick papers that are related to each other
4 Favour papers from well-known Journals and Conferences
S.No Description
5 Favour “first” or “foundational” papers in the field
6 Favour more recent papers ( previous 5 - 10 years)
7 Once we have identified an interesting technology, We have to follow developments in that particular technology (Updates)
A WELL DEFINED PROBLEM IS
HALF SOLVED....
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Related Works / Background
4. Terminology
5. Comparative Analysis
6. Research Challenges
7. Classifications
8. Evaluative Results
9. Conclusion
10. References
Gives a structure to our survey,
A clear description of the field.
What is the current status?
What you are going to do?
Short History about our field
Author(s) Name, Year
Invention of an algorithm
The Evolution of technology
Which are the conferences, workshops, journals, special
editions which are carrying the papers related to the topic?
Categorize the list of papers what you have collected for the
survey
Better they should be interrelated
It may be categorized by year, development or some features
Introduce the terminology of the field
Describe what are the various terms mean
What is very important is to map the terminological variations
Some researchers invent specific new terms
Identify the major types of techniques in the field and When are
they being created?
How are they related to each other – technique-wise and
system-wise?
Distinguish the main differences between the different
techniques?
Compare the performance of the different types of techniques?
The description of the various research challenges of the field
This is the hardest to write, because it is the part which is creative
We need to provide an integral view on the research activity of the
field
We need to rewrite the descriptions in our own words.
Classification, slicing and dicing, taxonomy
When classify the generic field to specific field we will get a
new idea
Sometimes it helps do introduce a new taxonomy that is
classification scheme in the field
What will be the evaluation criteria that you will be using for
comparing the different technologies?
Decide what are you going to tell about each paper
In which way are they better?
higher performance? higher robustness?
lower computational complexity?
It should be very clear
It should describes, from the survey what we have learned
Also describes about our proposed & future work
Our Research paper should be without
PLAGIARISM
Remember to cite the full information about the paper, including
author names, paper title, publication details and page numbers,
etc,
[1] Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A., Toward the Next
Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of
the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions, IEEE
Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,
Vol. 17, No. 6. (June 2005), pp. 734-749.
Within our paper where we will use this reference as a part of
our text, use “[1]” to refer to the above reference.
For a more comprehensive example and guide on how to quote
references, see Springer’s “instructions for authors” below:
http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downlo
addocument/instruct-authors-e.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-392601-
0&teaserId=343495&CENTER_ID=357799
