30
By Rana Waqas Rana Arslan M.B.A (mor) THE GLOBE FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING CULTURE 1

The globe framework for assessing culture

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The globe framework for assessing culture

1

By

Rana WaqasRana Arslan

M.B.A (mor)

THE GLOBE FRAMEWORK FOR

ASSESSING CULTURE

Page 2: The globe framework for assessing culture

2

THE GLOBE FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING CULTURE• Abbreviation of Globe

Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness. Globe is research program extended Hofstede’s work by investigating cross-cultural leadership behavior to help the manager .

Page 3: The globe framework for assessing culture

3

Using data from 825 organization’s in 62 countries, the GLOBE team identified nine dimensions on which national cultures differ.

Page 4: The globe framework for assessing culture

4

ACCORDING TO GLOBE RESEARCH THERE IS THE NINE DIMENSIONS

Power distance Uncertainty avoidance AssertivenessHuman orientationFuture orientationInstitutional collectivismGender difference In-group collectivismPerformance orientation

Page 5: The globe framework for assessing culture

5

POWER DISTANCE

The degree to which members of a society expect power to be unequally shared.

High p.d Low p.dRussia Denmark Spain south Africa

Page 6: The globe framework for assessing culture

6

HIGH POWER DISTANCE SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Society is differentiated into classes.

Power seen as providing social order.

Resources available to only a few.

Page 7: The globe framework for assessing culture

7

LOW POWER DISTANCE SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Society has a large middle class.Power linked to corruption and

coercionResources are available to almost

all.

Page 8: The globe framework for assessing culture

8

UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCESociety’s support on social norms

and procedures to alleviate the impulsive of future unfavorable events.High U.A Low U.AAustria RussiaDenmark Hungary

Page 9: The globe framework for assessing culture

9

HIGH UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Use formality in interactions with others.

Are orderly and keep meticulous records.

Take moderate, carefully calculated risks.

Page 10: The globe framework for assessing culture

10

LOW UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Use informality in interactions with others.

Are less orderly and keep fewer records.

Are less calculating when taking risks.

Page 11: The globe framework for assessing culture

11

ASSERTIVENESSThe extent to which a society

encourages people to be tough and competitive vs modest and kind .

High Assertiveness Low AssertivenessSpain SwedenU.S.A New Zealand

Page 12: The globe framework for assessing culture

12

HIGH ASSERTIVENESS SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Value competition, success, and progress.

Communicate directly and clearly.Try to have control over the

environment.

Page 13: The globe framework for assessing culture

13

LOW ASSERTIVENESS SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Value cooperation and warm relationships.

Communicate indirectly; try to "save face.“

Try to be in harmony with the environment.

Page 14: The globe framework for assessing culture

14

FUTURE ORIENTATIONThe extent to which a society

encourages and rewards future oriented behaviors such as planning, investing in the future etc.High F.O Low F.ODenmark GermanyCanada Argentina

Page 15: The globe framework for assessing culture

15

HIGH FUTURE ORIENTATION SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Propensity to save now for the future.Emphasize working for long-term

success.Organizations tend to be flexible and

adaptive.

Page 16: The globe framework for assessing culture

16

LOW FUTURE ORIENTATION SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...Propensity to spend now, rather

than save.Prefer gratification as soon as

possible.Organizations tend to be

inflexible

Page 17: The globe framework for assessing culture

17

HUMANE ORIENTATION The degree to which a society

encourages and rewards individuals for being fair, generous, caring and kind to others.

High H.O Low H.OEgypt Germany

Malaysia France

Page 18: The globe framework for assessing culture

18

HIGH HUMANE ORIENTATION SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

The interests of others are important.Members of society are responsible

for promoting the well-being of others.

Child labor is limited by public supports.

Page 19: The globe framework for assessing culture

19

LOW HUMANE ORIENTATION SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

One's own self-interest is important.The state provides social and

economic support for individuals' well-being.

Child labor is an issue of low importance.

Page 20: The globe framework for assessing culture

20

PERFORMANCE ORIENTATION

The degree to which a society encourages and rewards group members for performance improvement and excellence.High P.F Low P.FU.S.A RussiaTaiwan Argentina

Page 21: The globe framework for assessing culture

21

HIGH PERFORMANCE ORIENTATION SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Value training and development.Value competitiveness and

materialism.View formal feedback as

necessary for performance improvement.

Page 22: The globe framework for assessing culture

22

LOW PERFORMANCE ORIENTATION SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Value societal and family relationships.

Value harmony with the environment.View formal feedback as judgmental

and discomfiting.

Page 23: The globe framework for assessing culture

23

IN-GROUP COLLECTIVISM

The extent to which members of a society take pride in membership in small groups such as their family and circle of close friends and the organizations in which they are employed.

High IG.C Low IG.CEgypt Denmarkchina Sweden

Page 24: The globe framework for assessing culture

24

HIGH IN-GROUP COLLECTIVISM SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Duties and obligations are important determinants of social behavior.

A strong distinction is made between in-groups and out-groups.

People emphasize relatedness with groups

Page 25: The globe framework for assessing culture

25

GENDER DIFFERENTIATIONThe extent to which a society

maximizes gender role differences.

High G.D Low G.DEgypt Denmarksouth Korea Sweden

Page 26: The globe framework for assessing culture

26

HIGH GENDER DIFFERENCE SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

More women in positions of authority.Less occupational sex segregation.Similar levels of educational

attainment for males and females.

Page 27: The globe framework for assessing culture

27

LOW GENDER DIFFERENCE SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Fewer women in positions of authority.More occupational sex segregation.A lower level of female educational

attainment, compared to that of males.

Page 28: The globe framework for assessing culture

28

INDIVIDUALISM COLLECTIVISM

The degree to which individuals are encouraged by societal institutions to be integrated into groups within organizations and society.High I.C Low I.CGermany DenmarkHungary Japan

Page 29: The globe framework for assessing culture

29

HIGH INDIVIDUALISM COLLECTIVISM SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Members assume that they are highly interdependent with the organization.

Group loyalty is encouraged, even if this undermines the pursuit of individual goals.

The society's economic system tends to maximize the interests of collectives.

Page 30: The globe framework for assessing culture

30

LOW INDIVIDUALISM COLLECTIVISM SOCIETIES HAVE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS...

Members assume that they are largely independent of the organization.

Pursuit of individual goals is encouraged, even at the expense of group loyalty.

The society's economic system tends to maximize the interests of individuals.