Upload
shamjith-km
View
253
Download
17
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
GCE Kannur
Citation preview
Structural Analysis - II
Approximate Methods
Dr. Rajesh K. N.Assistant professor in Civil EngineeringAssistant professor in Civil EngineeringGovt. College of Engineering, Kannur
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Module IIIModule III
Approximate Methods of Analysis of Multi-storey Frames
• Analysis for vertical loads - Substitute frames-Loading conditions for maximum positive and negative bending moments in beams and maximum bending moment in columns
• Analysis for lateral loads - Portal method–Cantilever method–yFactor method.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2
Why approximate analysis?
• Rapid check on computer aided analysis
y pp x y
• Preliminary dimensioning before exact analysis
Advantage? • Fasterg
Disadvantage? • Results are approximateg pp
• Approximate methods are particularly useful for multi-storey frames taller than 3 storeys.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Approximate analysis for Vertical LoadsApproximate analysis for Vertical Loads
SUBSTITUTE FRAME METHOD
• Analyse only a part of the frame – substitute frame
SUBSTITUTE FRAME METHOD
Analyse only a part of the frame substitute frame
• Carry out a two-cycle moment distribution
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Substitute frame
Actual frame
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Analysis done for:y
• Beam span moments• Beam support moments• Column moments
• Liveload positioning for the worst condition
• For the same frame, liveload positions for maximum span t t t d l t moments, support moments and column moments may
be different
• For maximum moments at different points, liveload positions may de different
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
positions may de different
LL positions for maximum positive span moment at Bp p p
BInfluence
D d l d Li l d
line for MB
Dead loads Live loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
LL positions for maximum negative support moment at A pos t o s o ax u egat e suppo t o e t at
AInfluence
Live loads
line for MA
Dead loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Dead loads
LL positions for maximum column moment M1 at C pos t o s o ax u co u o e t M1 at C
C
M1
Live loadsLive loads
Dead loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
LL positions for maximum column moment M2 at D pos t o s o ax u co u o e t M2 at
D
M2
D
Live loadsLive loads
Dead loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Problem 1: Total dead load is 12 kN/m. Total live load is 20 ob e : N/kN/m. Analyse the frame for midspan positive moment on BC.
4 m
6 m 6 m 6 m
B C DA
4m
4 m
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
11
12+20 kN/m
B D
12 kN/m 12 kN/m
B C DA 6 m 6 m 6 m
Fi d d t2 212 6 36AB
wlFEM kNm− − ×= = = − 36BAFEM kNm=
Fixed end moments
12 12AB
232 6 96FEM kN− × 96FEM kNm=9612BCFEM kNm= = −
36CD DCFEM FEM kNm− = =
96CBFEM kNm=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
36CD DCFEM FEM kNm
Distribution factors
1 4 6 0.254 6 4 4 4 4AB DC
K EIDF DFK K K EI EI EI
= = = =1 2 3 4 6 4 4 4 4AB DCK K K EI EI EI+ + + +
4 6K EI1
1 2 3 4
4 6 0.24 4 4 6 4 4 4 6BA
K EIDFK K K K EI EI EI EI
= = =+ + + + + +
0.2BC CD CB BADF DF DF DF= = = =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A B C D
0.2 0.2* * * * * * FEM
0.2 0.20.25 DFs0.25
* * * * * *
* * * * CO
Dist
* *
* * Final Moments
Dist
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A B C D
0.2 0.2-36 36 -96 96 -36 36 FEM
0.2 0.20.25 DFs0.25
9 12 12 -12 -12 -9
6 4.5 -6 6 -4.5 -6 CO
Dist
2.25 0.3 0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -2.25
-18.75 52.8 -89.7 89.7 52.8 18.75 Final Moments
Dist
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
B89.7kNm 89.7kNm32kN mA B89.7kNm 32kN m
23 32 6×
Midspan positive moment on BC,
3 32 689.7 32 3 54.32 2EM kNm×
= − − × + × =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Problem 2: Analyse the frame for beam negative moment at B. M t f i ti f b i 1 5 ti th t f l T t l d d Moment of inertia of beams is 1.5 times that of columns. Total dead load is 14 kN/m and total live load is 9 kN/m.
6 m 4m4 m
3.5
m.5
m
BA
m3
DC
3.5
m3.
5 m
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
17
3
14+9 kN/m 14+9 kN/mI
B D6 m
14 kN/mI
B C DA 6 m 4 m 4 m
I1.5I 1.5I 1.5I
Fi d d t2 223 6 69AB
wlFEM kNm− − ×= = = − 69BAFEM kNm=
Fixed end moments
12 12AB
223 4 30.67BC CBFEM FEM kNm×− = = = 30.67
12BC CBFEM FEM kNm
214 4 36CD DCFEM FEM kNm×− = = =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3612CD DCFEM FEM kNm
Distribution factors
( )( )
1 4 61.5 0.3044 6 4 3 5 4 3 5AB
K E IDFK K K E EI EI
= = =( )1 2 3 4 6 4 3.5 4 3.51.5AB K K K E EI EII+ + + +
1 5 6K I1
1 2 3 4
1.5 6 0.2091.5 6 3.5 3.5 1.5 4BA
K IDFK K K K I I I I
= = =+ + + + + +
1
1 2 3 4
1.5 4 0.3131.5 6 3.5 3.5 1.5 4BC
K IDFK K K K I I I I
= = =+ + + + + +1 2 3 4
0.284, 0.284, 0.396CB CD DCDF DF DF= = =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A B C D
0.209 0.313 0.284 0.2840.304 DFs0.3960.209 0.313* * * * ** * * *
FEM
Dist
0. 8 0. 8 0.396
* *
* *CODist
* * Final Moments
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A B C D
0.209 0.313-69 69 -30.67 30.67 -18.67 FEM
0.284 0.2840.304 DFs0.396
20.98 -8.01 -12 -3.41
10.49 -1.71 CO
Dist
-1.84 -2.75
69.64 -47.13 Final Moments
Dist
B 69 64kNm47 13kNm B 69.64kNm47.13kNm
Max. beam negative moment at B 69.64 kNm=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Approximate analysis for Horizontal LoadsApproximate analysis for Horizontal Loads
1 P t l th d1. Portal method
2. Cantilever method
3. Factor method
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
22
PORTAL METHODPORTAL METHOD
Assumptions
1. The points of contraflexure in all the members lie at their
midpoints.
2. Horizontal shear taken by each interior column is double y
that taken by each exterior column.
Horizontal forces are assumed to act only at the joints.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
CA B C DAP1
P 2P 2P PP
P
2P
2P
2P
2P
P
P
FE GHP2
Q 2Q 2Q Q
Q 2Q 2Q Q
J K LI
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
24
P1 2 2P P P P P= + + + 1
6PP⇒ =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2 2P P Q Q Q Q+ = + + + 1 2P PQ +⇒ =1 2 2 2P P Q Q Q Q+ = + + + 1 2
6Q⇒ =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Problem 3: Analyse the frame using portal method.ob e 3: y g p
B C DAm
120 kN
7 m 3.5 m 5 m
FE G H
3.5
m
180 kN
m
H
3.5
m
J K LI J K LI
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
27
Horizontal shears:
1, 2 2For the top storey P P P P P= + + +120 206
P kN⇒ = =
1 2,6
P PFor the bottom storey Q +=
120 180 506
kN+= =,
6y Q
6
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
120kN 3 5 mA
Moments:35kNm
m
3.5 mMoments:
35kN
20kN
1.75
m 35kNm 10kN
20kN
35kNm 35kNmB
35kNm 35kNm
40kN10kN70kNm
10kN
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
29
Beam moments:
B C DA
Beam moments:35
35
35
3535
3535 35 35
FE G H122.5
122.5
122.5 122.5
122.5 122.5
J K LI
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
30
Column moments:
B C DA 7035 kNm70
35 kNm
Column moments:
FE G H35 87.5 87.5175 70 3570 175
J K LI87.5 87.5175 175
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
31
Beam and Column moments:
35B D35 35 35
7035 7035 35 35
35 87 5 87.517570 3570
175
122.5 122.5
122 5
122.5
122 535 87.5 122.5 122.5 122.5
87 5 87 5175 17587.5 87.5175 175
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
32
Home work
B CA40 kN B CA
5 m
40 kN
5 m 7.5 m
FED3.
580 kN
m5
m
H IG
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
33
CANTILEVER METHODCANTILEVER METHOD
• Frame considered as a vertical cantilever
Assumptions
1. The points of contraflexure in all the members lie at
their midpoints.
2. The direct stresses (axial stresses) in the columns are
directly proportional to their distance from the directly proportional to their distance from the
centroidal vertical axis of the frame.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
P1
y1y2 y3
y4
P2
A1 A2A3 A4
Area of cross ti
Centroidal vertical axis of the frame
section
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4Ad A d Ad A dyA A A A+ + +
=+ + +
To locate centroidal vertical axis of the frame,
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN35
1 2 3 4A A A A+ + +
V1 V2 V3 V4
xMyI
σ =
MMI
is constant at a given height (of the ‘vertical cantilever’).
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4y y y yσ σ σ σ
= = = 31 2 431 2 4
1 2 3 4
V AV A V A V Ay y y y
⇒ = = = ( )1
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1 2 3 4y y y y1 2 3 4y y y y
1Ph m1
m2
H1 H2 H3 H4
2 B
V1 V2 V3 V4
1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 42BhM P Vm V m V m V m⇒ = + − −∑ ( )2
( ) ( ) 1 2 3 4, , , , .1 2From and V V V V can be found( ) ( ) 1 2 3 4, , , , .1 2From and V V V V can be found
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1P
H1 H2 H3 H4
1 1 2 3 4P H H H H= + + +
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Problem 4: Analyse the frame using cantilever method, if all ob e : y g ,the columns have the same area of cross section.
B C DAm
120 kN
7 m 3.5 m 5 m
FE G H
3.5
m
180 kN
m
H
3.5
m
J K LI J K LI
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
39
To locate centroidal vertical axis of the frame,
1 1 1 10 7 10.5 15.5A A A AyA A A A
× + × + × + ×=
+ + +
To locate centroidal vertical axis of the frame,
33 8.254
m= =1 1 1 1A A A A+ + + 4
120
8.25 1.25 2.257.25
180
Also, 31 2 431 2 4V AV A V A V A= = = 1 2 3 4V V V V
⇒ = = =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
40
Also,8.25 1.25 2.25 7.25
= = =8.25 1.25 2.25 7.25
⇒
1 25 2 25 7 25V V V1 1 12 3 4
1.25 2.25 7.25, ,8.25 8.25 8.25
V V VV V V= = =
1P
2h m1
m2
OH1 H2 H3 H4
2 O
V1 V2 V3 V4
1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 42OhM P Vm V m V m V m⇒ = + − −∑,For the top storey
1 2 3 43.5120 15.5 8.5 5 02
V V V V⇒ × = × + × − × − ×
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
41
3 5 ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞1 11
3.5 1.25 2.25120 15.5 8.5 52 8.25 8.25
V VV ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⇒ × = × + × − ×⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
1 13.615V kN⇒ =
21.25 13.615 2.063 ,
8.252 25 13 615
V kN×= =
32.25 13.615 3.713 ,
8.257 25 13 615
V kN×= =
×4
7.25 13.615 11.9658.25
V kN×= =
: 13.615 2.063 3.713 11.965 0Check + − − =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
H1 H2 H3 H4
V1 V2 V3 V4
O
V1 V2 V3 4
3 53 5⎛ ⎞
,For the bottom storey
1 2 3 43.53.5120 180 15.5 8.5 5 03.522OM V V V V⎛ ⎞⇒ × + × = × + × − × − ×+⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠∑
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3 5 1 25 2 253 5 V V⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ 1 11
3.5 1.25 2.253.5120 180 15.5 8.5 53.52 8.25 8.252
V VV ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞⇒ × + × = × + × − ×+⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
1 61.267V kN⇒ =
1 25 61 267×2
1.25 61.267 9.283 ,8.25
2.25 61.267 16 709
V kN
V kN
×= =
×3 16.709 ,
8.257.25 61.267 53 841
V kN
V kN
= =
×= =4 53.841
8.25V kN= =
: 61 267 9 283 16 709 53 841 0Check + − − =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
: 61.267 9.283 16.709 53.841 0Check + − − =
120kNMoments:
47.652kNmA120kN 3.5 m
Moments: A
1.75
m 47.652kNm 13.615kN
27.3kN
k13.615kN
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN45
Beam and Column moments:
29.9B D47.6 27.4 29.9
7547.6 57.3B D
47.6 27.4 29.9
47 6 119 2 74.8187.857.3 29.975
143.2
166.8 96
96
104.7
104 747.6 119.2 74.8187.8 143.2166.8 96 104.7
119 2 74 8187 8 143 2119.2 74.8187.8 143.2
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
46
BA25 kNHome workBA25 kN
6 m
5 m
DC50 kN
3.5
3.5
m
k FE55 kN
4.5
m
HG
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
47
FACTOR METHODFACTOR METHOD
• More accurate than Portal and Cantilever methodsMore accurate than Portal and Cantilever methods
• Specially useful when moments of inertia of various
b d ffmembers are different.
Basis:
• At any joint the total moment is shared by all the members
in proportion to their stiffnesses
• Half the moment gets carried over to the far endHalf the moment gets carried over to the far end
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Gi d d l f t Girder and column factors:
• Relative stiffness of a member Ik =
Girder factor at a joint
Relative stiffness of a member kL
=
Girder factor at a joint
,k of all meeting at the jointg
columns= ∑
,g
k of all members meeting at the joint=∑
Column factor at a joint
,1
,k of all meeting at the joint
c gk of all members meeting at the joint
beams= = −∑∑
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
, f g j∑
Moment factor for a member
,mC c k for a column= ,,
m
m
fG g k for a beam=
m
m
where c c half of column facor of far endand g g half of girder facor of far end
= += +m
storeC sum of column moment factors for a y→∑G sum of beam moment factors for a joint→∑
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Problem 5: Analyse the frame using factor method.
H IG40 kN
ob e 5: y g
H IG
5 m
40 kN
5 m 7.5 m
FED3.
580 kN
m5
m
B CA
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Total column moment above DEF 40 3.5 140kNm= × =
Total column moment above ABC 40 8 5 80 5 740kNm= × + × =Total column moment above ABC 40 8.5 80 5 740kNm× + ×
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12JOINT MEMBER k=I/L Ʃk FACTOR c/2 5+6 MOMENT Total Col DFB BeamJOINT MEMBER k I/L Ʃk FACTOR c/2,
g/2 from far end
5+6 MOMENT FACTOR
Total Col.
Mom, MT
Col. Mom, MC =MT×
C/ƩC
DFB
=G/ƩGBeam Mom
= MC ×DFBCol Beam Col Beam c
=Ʃk(beg
=Ʃk(ccm gm C=
cm ×G = gm × C/ƩC(
ams)/Ʃk
(olumns)/Ʃk
k k
DDA 0.2
0.6860.29 0.5 0.79 0.158 740 99.4
DE 0.2 0.71 0.3 1.01 0.202 1 122.6DG 0 286 0 29 0 3 0 59 0 169 140 23 2DG 0.286 0.29 0.3 0.59 0.169 140 23.2
E
ED 0.2
0.819
0.59 0.36 0.95 0.19 0.59 83.25EH 0.286 0.41 0.27 0.68 0.194 140 26.6
EF 0.133 0.59 0.4 0.99 0.132 0.41 57.85EB 0.2 0.41 0.5 0.91 0.182 740 114.5
FE 0 133 0 79 0 3 1 09 0 145 1 133 03F
FE 0.1330.772
0.79 0.3 1.09 0.145 1 133.03FI 0.286 0.21 0.16 0.37 0.106 140 14.6FC 0.2 0.21 0.5 0.71 0.142 740 89.3
G GD 0.286 0.486 0.59 0.15 0.74 0.212 140 29.1GH 0.2 0.41 0.23 0.64 0.128 1 29.1
HHG 0.2
0.7720.46 0.21 0.67 0.134 0.559 16.5
HE 0.286 0.54 0.21 0.75 0.215 140 29.5HI 0.133 0.46 0.34 0.8 0.106 0.441 13.0
I IH 0.133 0.419 0.68 0.23 0.91 0.121 1 16.58IF 0 286 0 32 0 11 0 43 0 123 140 16 58IF 0.286 0.32 0.11 0.43 0.123 140 16.58
A AD 0.2 X 0.2 1 0 0.15 1.15 0.23 740 144.7B BE 0.2 X 0.2 1 0 0.21 1.21 0.242 740 152.2C CF 0.2 X 0.2 1 0 0.11 1.11 0.222 740 139.6
0 169 0 194 0 106 0 212 0 215 0 123 1 019F h C∑Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
, 0.169 0.194 0.106 0.212 0.215 0.123 1.019For the top storey C = + + + + + =∑, 0.158 0.182 0.142 0.23 0.242 0.222 1.176For the bottom storey C = + + + + + =∑
Home work
B CA120 kN
6 m 6 m
4 m
60 kN FED60 kN6
m
H IG
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
54
SummarySummary
Approximate Methods of Analysis of Multi-storey Frames
• Analysis for vertical loads - Substitute frames-Loading conditions for maximum positive and negative bending moments in beams and maximum bending moment in columns
• Analysis for lateral loads - Portal method–Cantilever method–yFactor method.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN