Upload
ishan-kossambe
View
556
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation analytically evaluates the dynamic response of a quarter car using semi active control system. Semi active control system are becoming popular because they provide with good reliability like passive system and consume less power to give better performance than the active system. Magnetorheological (MR) fluid can produce good controllable damping force under the application of magnetic field and hence can be used as effective element in semiactive vibration control. Out of the various semi active control strategies, the Bouc-Wen model control strategy is used in this work. Response of the quarter car is measured using MR damper and compared with normal passive damper.
Citation preview
Semi Active Vibration Control of Quarter Car
Model Using Magnetorheological Fluid
Damper
Introduction
• Types of suspension system
1. Passive System
2. Active System
3. Semi-Active System
What is MR Fluid?
• Fluid suspended with ferrous particles
• Damping force is proportional to the applied magnetic
field
• Same efficiency as that of active system consuming less
power
Methodology
• Quarter car modeling
• Where m1= 250 kg, m2 = 1300 kg, K = 650000 N/m, C =
800 Ns/m, k = 110000 N/m
• To calculate Frh:
1. Conventional Damper
Where c = 6000 Ns/m
2. MR damper
For calculating the damping force exerted by MR damper
we have used Bouc Wen Model
c0 =5300 Ns/m,
c1 = 93000 Ns/m,
k0 = 1400 N/m,
k1 = 540 N/m,
α = 96300 N/m, β = 2000000 m-2,
γ = 2000000 m-2,
n = 2,
δ = 207,
x0 = 0
Conventional System Simulink Model
MR Damper Simulink Model
Results of Simulation
Sprung Mass Displacement
Conventional MR Damper
Sprung Mass Velocity
Conventional MR Damper
Unsprung Mass Displacement
Conventional MR Damper
Unsprung Mass Velocity
Conventional MR Damper
Conclusion
• This paper presents a new approach of controlling the
response of a quarter car vehicle model traversing a
rough road with semi-active MR damper suspensions.
• The MR damper performance is sought to be better as
compared to the conventional passive damper system.
References1. S.B.Choi ,S.K.Lee ,Y.P.Park ,A hysteresis model for the field dependent
damping force of a magnetorheological damper, Journal of Sound andVibration 245 (2) (2001) 375–383.
2. Karnopp D, Crosby MJ, Farwood RA. Vibration control using semi-active forcegenerators. ASME J Eng Ind 1974;96(2):619–26.
3. R. S. Prabhakar, C. Sujatha and S. Narayanan, “Response of a quarter carmodel with optimal magnetorheological damper parameters,” Journal of Soundand Vibration, vol. 332, pp. 2191-2206, 2013.
4. M.Ahmadian, C.A.Pare, A quarter-car experimental analysis of alternativesemiactive control methods, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems andStructures 11 (8) (2000) 604–612.
5. G.Z. Yao, F.F. Yap, G. Chen, W.H. Li, S.H. Yeo, MR damper and its applicationfor semi-active control of vehicle suspension system, Mechatronics 12 (2002)963–973.
6. K. Yi and B. S. Song, “A new adaptive sky-hook control of vehicle semi-activesuspensions,” in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, PartD: Journal of Automobile Engineering, vol. 213 (3), pp. 293-303, 1999.
7. T. Butz and O. Von Stryk, “Modelling and simulation of electro andmagnetorheological fluid dampers,” Journal of Applied Mathematics andMechanics 82 (1), pp. 3-20, 2002.