55

Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

  • Upload
    varmahk

  • View
    580

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development
Page 2: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Welcome to the program

Optimize product performance thru’

VMD

Vendor Management Development

by

H K Varma [email protected] 98202 62986 22 426 62986

Page 3: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Managing supplier quality

• Managing supplier quality is a challenge for most organizations, even the ones that do it well.

• In a space where precision is key, slight variations in processes equipment used, or materials sourced by suppliers

• can quickly result in rejects and dissolved relationships.

• These variations really highlight the need for a seamless Vendor quality management system , VMD

Page 4: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Role of Vendor in a seamless SC

• For most organizations, the processes associated with the acquisition of materials and services represent the “front door” of their Supply Chain.

• On average, companies spend more than 60% of total sales on the acquisition and administration of materials and services, +

an additional 10% for logistics and order fulfillment.

• A good Supply Chain helps to reduce

– lengthy cycle times

– Inventory

– ensure the smooth receipt and delivery of material or services to point of use. &

– Reduce acquisition costs

Page 5: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

SBU EVA Tree

Mfg Cost Var Output at TP Stores cr. 4000

305 3972 +/- in WIP 178

PBIT Misc Output -206

1255 Input Cost

3667 Dir Malt 2940

NOPAT Dir Lab 31

874 Mktg PBIT Sales/Serv 6000 Malt OH 47

929 Cost of Sales 3972 Shop OH 261

ED on Sales 794 PGOH 36

TAX OD Adj Pers Rel Exp 89 Comm Exp 163

EVA 381 -65 T&C 54 Alloc Exp 189

425 Sales Pr Exp 8

Corp alloc NDC 19

86 ODE 63

WACC Estb 31

12% Other Exp 41

Cap Chg MMI 950

409 Cap Emp WIP 250

3406 Net F Assets FG 53

560 Curr Assets Cust OS 3073

4393 Oth contl A 67

Net WC

2846

Curr Liabilities Vendor Cr 1360

1547 Cust Adv 33

OCL 154

18%

Hence it is important that we develop our suppliers to be more Cost competitive , thru improvement in Quality, Processes , Six Sigma , SPC at their end

Page 6: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Cost of Quality

Cost of Quality

Cost of good quality

Cost of poor quality

=

+

Quality

Assurance thru’

CA PA

Page 7: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Cost of Quality Management vs Cost of servicing defects

Low Quality High

Low

C

ost

H

igh

Total cost of Quality

Minimum cost of Quality

Total cost of Quality

Cost of Service defects

Optimum level of Service uality

Where you want

to be

Cost of Quality

Management

96% 97% 98% 99.99%

Page 8: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

The Lean-Six Sigma philosophy Cost of Quality Management vs Cost of servicing defects

Low

C

ost

H

igh

Prevention

and Appraisal

cost

Failure costs

𝟒𝝈

𝟓𝝈

𝟔𝝈

96% 97% 98% 99.99%

Page 9: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Build an Integrated IT Architecture That Extends Deep Into Your Supply Chain

• Disconnected IT – data sources and systems – is one of the biggest roadblocks to performance improvements.

• Develop supplier metrics / dashboards to have more control over supplier-related activities, some of which are highlighted below: – E-Billing , Bill Parking – Sharing of OEE data – Sharing of Stock levels – On-line SPC data thru Web portal – Production status

• Automate the collection of metrics data where possible

Page 10: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Supplier Quality - Visibility

• Supplier Quality Management largely depends on the efficient production of materials while minimizing adverse events.

• A supplier that performs well,

– quickly communicates non-conformances or deviations,

– responds to audit or report requests,

– relays process/equipment changes and, among many other areas,

• meets delivery requirements.

• Not dealing with adverse events and non-conformance related to performance directly translates to supplier risk.

• This is an ideal method of obtaining a real-time performance assessment and greater visibility

Page 11: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Vendor assessment • Traditionally, quality managers send representatives for on-site

audits to view actual production lines. – This, of course, becomes costly with globalization, unless

suppliers have been chosen within close proximity.

• The following elements are key for improving your enterprise risk portfolio for decision-makers working with suppliers

– Compliance Management

– Supplier Quality Management

– Environment, Health, and Safety (EH&S)

– Calibration Management

– Employee Training

Page 12: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Supplier Assessment Scorecard

• With suppliers comes risk, and supplier assessment scorecards are critical to managing, understanding, and mitigating that risk

• Supplier Assessment Scorecards: Scorecards enhance the operational risk management aspects of SQM (Supplier Quality

Management)

• By quantifying supplier performance , we can effectively prioritize issues that require the most attention

• Research has shown that the earlier a defect or nonconformance is caught the less expensive it will be in the long-run

• Companies that rely on many suppliers are developing supplier risk scorecards and processes to evaluate and rank suppliers based on historical and current performance

Page 13: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Vendor Assessment II ( Criticality * Rating )

1 = Not Important 4 = Critical

1 = Poor 4 = High

Vendor rating

Criteria No.

Criteria Importance (A)

Rating(B) A*B

1 2 3 4

1 Work stn condition 3

2 Maintenance of m/cs 3

3 Productivity 4

4 Safety Initiatives 4

..

20 Quality Systems 4

Vendor ::

Min Score = 20 Max Score = 320 Evaluation CFT …….. Score < 100 Rejected

Page 14: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Max

Score Weighted

score

1. GENERAL ORGANIZATION: 4 2.9

2. SAFETY 4 2.3

3. INSPECTION 4 3.4

4. DRAWING & REVISION CONTROL 4 2.8

5. PROCUREMENT: INCOMING R M CONTROL 4 2.4

6. MANUFACTURING PROCESSES 4 2.1

7. TOOLINGS & MEASURING INSTRUMENTS 4 3.7

8. QUALITY : QUALITY INDICATORS 4 2.6

9. M/C & TOOLING MAINTENANCE SYSTEM 4 2.5

10. ENVIRONMENT 4 3.2

40 27.9

Supplier Assessment (Summary)

Page 15: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Gr 3

1. GENERAL ORGANIZATION: Weightage Rating at the time of Visit Weighted

Score Capability Score 1-4

1.1 - Work Station Condition 40% Medium

1.2 - Customer Documentation 60% Low

2. SAFETY

2.1 -Availability of safety equipment: 30% Medium

2.2 - Workmen wearing safety shoes , gloves etc: 70% Low

3. INSPECTION

3.1 -First Piece & In-Process Inspection: 60% Medium

3.2 - End Product Inspection: 40% High

4. DRAWING & REVISION CONTROL

4.1 - Availability of Drawing & Inspection Checklist 40% High

4.2 - Ability to Understand Part Drawings: 60% Low

5. PROCUREMENT: INCOMING RAW MATERIAL CONTROL

5.1 - Material Procurement: 40% Low

5.2 - Component & Raw Material Storage: 60% Medium

6. MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

6.1 - Competence over Manufacturing Processes: 40% Medium

6.2 - Work Instructions: 60% Low

7. TOOLINGS & MEASURING INSTRUMENTS

7.1 - Measurement Calibration System: 70% High

7.2 - Tooling Storage & Protection: 30% Medium

8. QUALITY : QUALITY INDICATORS

8.1 - Quality Management System 40% Medium

8.2 - Supplier Quality & Delivery Indicators: 60% Medium

9. M/C & TOOLING MAINTENANCE SYSTEM

9.1 - Machine maintenance system: 50% Low

9.1 - Tool maintenance system: 50% Medium

10. ENVIRONMENT

10.1 - Energy conservation : 40% Low

10.2 - Re-cycling of process wastes : 60% High

Page 16: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Supplier Assessment score

Overall

Score

Acceptable > 30 Green

Conditional 20 - 30 Orange

Poor

Performer

12 - 20 Yellow

Rejected < 12 Red

Vendors with low scores are asked to overcome the shortcomings with focus on time-bound improvements

Page 17: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Establish Processes for Managing Supplier Compliance and Audits

• Supplier audits can support meeting compliance requirements,

but not every organization has the resources required or the processes in place to conduct them.

• It’s crucial to establish a collaborative relationship in conjunction with formal audit management plan, which outlines

– the frequency of on-site visits,

– reporting requirements for suppliers, and

– the depth into the supply chain to which you’ll go for auditing suppliers.

Page 18: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

• Supplier Audits – A team from Focal Organization visits the Vendor and allocates points against a number of queries in a questionnaire.

• Important factors to be used as criteria for vendor evaluation are determined. These are usually variables that add value to the process through increased service or decreased cost.

• Actual working of the various departments is audited by examining records, analysis of the system and talking to people on the spot.

• Need to be repeated at regular intervals to monitor improvements.

• After determining which factors are critical, a method is devised that allows the vendor to be judged or rated on each individual factor.

• Rating should be converted to numeric values to assess the Risk and rank the vendors in descending order.

Page 19: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Zero

Rejection

Guide in Investing in

latest technology

Develop new

products fast

Small lots

ISO9000/ TS16949/ ISO14001-E /18001-HS

Impln.of Lean & six sigma initiatives

Reduce costs thru’ VE Loaning of

tools, gauges , testing equip etc

Vendor Training

Negotiation with supplier’s supplier

Support in crucial areas to enhance Quality and

Service

On-time Delivery

Page 20: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Environmental and Health & safety measures

Benefits

• ISO 14001 - International Organization for Standardization

– By reducing waste and using fewer raw materials, costs are reduced.

– Fewer costs give companies a competitive advantage.

– By managing environmental issues before a problem arises, companies benefit from reduced liability.

• OHSAS 18001 - Occupational Health & Safety Advisory Services

– Identifies health hazards and evaluates risks

– Provides a safer, healthier work environment. This should help reduce lost time due to illness and injury.

– Fewer accidents and injuries lead to reductions in liability claims and lower insurance premiums.

Page 21: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Training subcontractors • Training constitutes one of the most important stages in

supplier development.

• Its purpose is to overcome deficiencies in different areas of operation , quality etc

• It can be arranged on a group basis or on an individual basis.

• The vendor’s staff chosen for the training then cascades down to the remainder of the workforce.

• The training may be organized by the main contractor :—

– from among its own personnel, experts or

– from among bodies such as a chamber of commerce and industry, professional association, university etc.

Page 22: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

ISO 9000 / TS 16949 certification ----

• ISO 9000 certification stresses the importance of compliance

on technical specifications and the quality requirements .

• In fact , some procuring enterprises agree to work with

suppliers only if they are ISO 9000 certified.

• To help subcontractors acquire such certification, main contractor should assist them with regard to system & procedures to be adopted for

• documentation control

• product purchasing

………………..

Page 23: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Organization of work within the enterprise

• Internal functioning of an enterprise is important from a quality

viewpoint.

• Thus to gain a better appreciation of overall coordination the

organization would need:

– No barriers between different departments / Sections

(Homogeneity between departments)

– Encourage teamwork

– Organize discussions on working practices and investigate

solutions to problems

Page 24: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Improving Quality by improving Processes

1. KPIs should help in identifying areas for improvement and determining which areas require more resources or some type of change.

2. Ensure higher OTD while maintaining Cost and Quality (Higher Sigma levels) .

3. Approach – Make Vendor’s existing processes better

– Focus on training and developing skills of Vendor workforce

4. Monitor Cp , Cpk (Higher Cp , Cpk :: less scrap / wastes)

5. Accordingly Vendors are rated on their performance ( Called External factors) ie , Quality , OTD , Service , Flexibility to develop and retain a healthy vendor base

6. Review KPIs monthly , quarterly , yearly

Page 25: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Vendor

Total receipts

% Accepted

Quality

Rating

%*35

Actual

price

Std Cost

Std/ Actu

al price

Price Ratin

g

Ratio * 30

As per

Schedule

Delivery

Rating % * 20

Service

No. of

Suggestions…

% of

total suggestions…..

Service

Rating

% * 15

A 100 90 31.5 40 40 1.0 80 16 2 33 5

B 60 80 28 50 48 0.96 55 18.3 1 17 2.4

C 50 70 24.5 60 53 0.9 45 18 3 50 7.5

Total Vendor Composite Rating III ( with weight ages for Quality , Price , Delivery & Service)

Page 26: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Hold Suppliers More Accountable For the Quality of their Products

Drive performance improvement thru’ CFTs to manage quality across entire spectrum of suppliers

⁻ Non-Conformances / Corrective and Preventive Action (NC/CAPA)

⁻ Complaint Handling

⁻ Statistical Process Control (SPC) – to get Real-time visibility of supplier quality metrics through web-based portal

• It also eliminates surprises on the receiving nonconforming materials.

Page 27: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Receipt data

a. Vendor ‘A’ receipts Dec’13 80

b. FTR (First time right) 72

c. FPY 90.00%

d. Accepted with TCN 1

e. Accepted after Sorting/Re-work 6

f. Rejection returned back 1

g. Ultimate Yield (80-1)/80 98.75%

h. Hidden Factory 8.75%

Role of SPC is to monitor process on regular basis there by

eliminate / minimize the Hidden factory

Page 28: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Group 1 2 3 4

Lots In (Nos) 120 120 120 120

Accepted after change note 13 9 6 1

Reworked 12 7 4 1

Scrapped 5 2 1 -

Calculate Hidden factory

First Time Yield (%) 75% 85% 91% 98%

Ultimate yield (%) 96% 98% 99% 100%

Hidden factory (%) 21% 13% 8% 2%

Exercise

Hidden Factory - Answers

Focus should be at improving the FTY & reducing the

Hidden factory

}

Page 29: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Why Six Sigma Quality 1. The sigma scale is a universal

measure of how well a critical characteristic performs

2. The higher the sigma score, the more capable the process.

3. Products with more characteristics (CTQs),need Six sigma quality standards to ensure final product performance

4. Even if the milestone of Six Sigma may take time to reach, the act of working toward that goal drives breakthrough changes.

Sig

ma

Percent

defective

Defects

per

million

1

69%

691,462

2 31% 308,538

3 6.7% 66,807

4 0.62% 6,210

5 0.023% 233

6 0.00034% 3.4

7 0.0000019% 0.019

Note the difference 1. Conventional quality 3 % d , 2. Under Six Sigma it is 3 out of a

million

Conventional quality 3 % d

3.4 3.0% d 30,000

Higher Sigma >>> Lower defects

Page 30: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Six Sigma • Every mistake an organization or person makes ultimately has

a cost,

– the need to do a certain task over again,

– the part that has to be replaced,

– time or material wasted

• Six Sigma is a scientific problem solving tool for

– meeting your customer's needs (Time , speed , Quality )

– minimizing wasted resources (Errors , rework , Hidden factory , variations +/-)

– maximizing profit in the process ,thru’ disciplined data

collection and analysis to determine best solutions

Page 31: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Mean = 12gm

USL=12.2

LSL=11.8

Filling of an oil bottle ( 𝟏𝟐𝐠𝐦+𝟎.𝟐

−𝟎.𝟐 )

VOC

VOC

𝜎 = 0.17

Is the process under statistical control ?

Rejections = 1.8𝜎

Rejections = 1.8𝜎

VOP

VOP

12 +

− 1𝝈 = 12

+𝟎.𝟏𝟕

−𝟎.𝟏𝟕=

𝟏𝟐.𝟏𝟕

𝟏𝟏.𝟖𝟑

VOP = 12+

− 3𝝈 = 12

+0.51

−0.51=

12.51

11.49

2.4

Process Sigma

2 .4

VOP = 6

For a process to be under 6 𝐒𝐢𝐠𝐦𝐚 , value of std.dev should be

minimum 𝟏

𝟔 (USL-LSL) , ie 6𝝈 should fit the Spec. width (VOC).

What is ideal Std dev. (𝝈) ………

How do we ensure a

6𝝈 performance

Page 32: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

𝐗 Chart For variables like Dimensions , weight , Temperature , hardness , viscosity etc

9

9.2

9.4

9.6

9.8

10

10.2

10.4

10.6

10.8

11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

𝑋 chart also shows all values within UCL & LCL , which indicates process is in control

𝐔𝐂𝐋 = 𝐗 + 𝐀𝟐 𝐑 = 10.61

𝐋𝐂𝐋 = 𝐗 − 𝐀𝟐 𝐑 = 9.33

𝐗 = 9.97

Page 33: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Control Charts

Background

• Dr Shewhart in1920 observed that every process exhibits some degree of variation

• Since no two things can be produced exactly alike , variation is natural and should be expected

• He defined that if a measurement falls within plus or minus three standard deviations of its average, it is considered “expected” behavior for the process.

• This is known as common cause variation

• He observed two types of variations in any process

Page 34: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Control Charts

Chance cause variation

• Inherent (Common cause) in the process . It is random & cannot be controlled ...............

• Hence a process which operates with only chance variation is within statistical control .

– Limits are generally +/-3σ ( Value of σ may vary from case to case)

– (99.7% within and 0.3% above UCL or below LCL)

• Once the process is within control , adjustments can be made to minimize random variations to further improve the process

Page 35: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Variable Control Charts

• Variable Control charts are used to monitor measurable quality characteristics of a process eg Temperature , dimension , weight , viscosity etc

• Variable charts can monitor only one quality characteristic at a time .

• Variable Control charts help to monitor both process mean X and process variability R or σ

• Hence it becomes necessary to use minimum 2 control charts to study the process. Ie

– Range or Std Deviation

– Process mean , with UCL & LCL

Page 36: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

R Chart out of limits

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

A process is not in statistical control if any point falls outside the control limits.

First , control the process before going for X or S chart

Page 37: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

S Chart

Sample Sample observations 𝐗 Std Dev

1 9.26 10.44 10.39 9.87 10.26 10.04 0.49

2 10.92 10.08 9.97 10.16 9.30 10.09 0.58

3 10.10 10.61 8.62 10.24 10.17 9.95 0.77

4 10.17 9.24 10.60 10.08 10.51 10.12 0.54

5 10.29 10.36 10.39 10.58 9.96 10.32 0.23

6 9.84 9.52 10.11 9.65 10.18 9.86 0.29

7 9.84 9.77 10.47 10.25 10.28 10.12 0.30

…25

B4 and B3 from Control limit chart

To ascertains deviation between the sample For sample size > 10

𝐒 = 0.45

UCL = 𝐁𝟒 ∗ 𝐒 = 2.089*0.45 = 0.94

LCL = 𝐁𝟑 ∗ 𝐒 = 0 * 0.45 = 0

Page 38: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Control Limit factors dev. by Statistical Quality Control and Management Institute

Samp Size

Factors for 𝐗 charts Factors for R Charts Factors for S charts Samp

size

n A A2 A3 D1 D2 D3 D4 d3 B3 B4 B5 B6 n

2 2.121 1.880 2.659 0.000 3.686 0.000 3.267 0.853 0.000 3.267 0.000 2.606 2

3 1.732 1.023 1.954 0.000 4.358 0.000 2.574 0.880 0.000 2.568 0.000 2.276 3

4 1.500 0.729 1.628 0.000 4.698 0.000 2.282 0.880 0.000 2.266 0.000 2.088 4

5 1.342 0.577 1.427 0.000 4.918 0.000 2.114 0.864 0.00 2.089 0.000 1.964 5

6 1.225 0.483 1.287 0.000 5.078 0.000 2.004 0.848 0.030 1.970 0.029 1.874 6

7 1.134 0.419 1.182 0.204 5.204 0.076 1.924 0.833 0.118 1.882 0.113 1.806 7

Page 39: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Observations

VOC = 10” +/- 0.60

Cp = VOC/VOP

= (10.6−9.4)

6∗0.45

𝐶𝑝 = 0.44

USL = 10.60

LSL = 9.40

Conclusion

Though the process is under control (All points within UCL & LCL), the process capability Cp = 0.44

If , however the σ is reduced to ∶ 0.20 , 𝐂𝐩 = 𝟏. 𝟎𝟎 and

If , the σ is further improved to ∶ 0.15 , 𝐂𝐩 = 𝟏. 𝟑𝟑

Hence it important that SPC is under control and 𝐶𝑝 𝑖𝑠 > 1

VOP = 6𝝈

Page 40: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Variable ( Continuous) data Control chart Summary

Control Chart Sub-group size (n)

Control limits

Average and Standard deviation X , R

2-10 UCL = X + A2 R

LCL = X - A2 R

Range R 2-10 UCL = D4 * R

LCL = D3 * R

Average and Standard deviation X , S

>10 UCL = B4 S

LCL = B3 S

Individuals and moving range MR - Range - X

1 UCL = D4 ∗ MR

LCL = D3 ∗ MR

UCL = X + 3MR

d2

LCL = X − 3MR

d2

Page 41: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

MR Chart Tensile Strength of Bridge bolt (Ksi)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

As there are no out-of-control conditions , the process is operating in-control. Moving range within normal

UCL = 𝐃𝟒 ∗ 𝐌𝐑 = 3.267*11.47 = 37.47

LCL = 𝐃𝟑 ∗ 𝐌𝐑 = 0*11.47 = 0

𝐌𝐑 = 11.47

Page 42: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

100% Within +/- 3 std Dev

95% Within +/- 2 std Dev

Apprx. 69% Within +/- 1 std Dev

Interpreting Control Charts :: Test Zones :: Each control limit represents

1 std deviation

UCL

LCL

Centerline

Rarely a point would fall outside the control limits

Page 43: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Control Charts for Attributes

• Whenever it is difficult to take numerical measurement the quality is judged either conforming / non-conforming - Defectives based on attributes( Np and p charts) :

– Leaks / does not leak , No. of counts scratches , holes , dents etc .

• Attribute data can have two values , such as pass/fail present/absent etc ie data which can be counted.

• The inspection doesn’t require spl trained people as no measurements are involved .

Page 44: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

F-Flexibility measures

• Volume flexibility (Fv ) : measures the proportion of demand that can be met profitably by the supply chain system

• Delivery flexibility (Fd ) :

– The ability to move planned delivery dates forward .

– Delivery flexibility is expressed as the percentage of slack time by which the delivery time can be reduced

• Mix flexibility (Fm ) : the response time between product mix changes.

• New product flexibility (Fn): is defined as the ease with which new products are introduced , the time or cost required to add new products to existing production operations

Page 45: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Delivery flexibility (Fd)

• Delivery dates change regularly and costs are associated with not meeting the delivery dates

• The ability to move planned delivery dates forward may be important in supply chain management.

• This ability allows the supply chain to accommodate rush orders and special orders, and is described as delivery flexibility.

• Delivery flexibility is expressed as the percentage of slack time by which the delivery time can be reduced/advanced

Page 46: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Vendor Performance dashboard

• Real-time information is put on supplier dashboard giving internal and external supplier metrics and Key Performance Indicators

• The Vendors are judged on their performance the way we judge the performance of our employees.

• The goal is to develop a world-class supplier quality system

• Steps to build a world class Vendor base

– Standardized Vendor audit process

– Building Vendor risk management scorecard

• It helps to actually know which suppliers are more risk-prone and therefore require more attention v/s auditing suppliers arbitrarily or because a certain amount of time has passed.

Page 47: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Vendor Performance dashboard

• Some vendors need to be audited in 6 months , some in 12 months.

• Helps in strategic use of resources

• One of the most notable advantages is of connecting what were traditionally individual silos, now putting all of that information in a central location

• Focused approach on the suppliers who might need the most help in improving processes

• Efforts are put where they matter most.

Page 48: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

VQMS dashboard – (Each Vendor)

Vendor : Ms Everest Enterprise – EV078

3. KPI- System output (Higher the

better)

Flexibility – Volume (Scale 0 to 1.50)

1.3

Flexibility – Timeline (Scale 0 to 40)

32

4. KPI-Estimated

Service ( Bill Parking , Test Certificate , VE , Innovative , SPC & data :: scale 1 to 40)

26 Supports Six Sigma , VE , Lean , IT networking

JIT Implementation (doc reduction 10% - 40% wrt previous year)

20 %

YOY reduction in Lot qty (80/20

principle)

2. KPI- System output - Quality and OTD (Higher

the better)

Quality Rating (Scale 1 to 100) 89

OTD - Time (scale 1 – 100) 93

OTD - Qty (scale 1 – 100) 89

Vendor Assessment Score (CFT : JHK , RTD , VSH , ARD)

Score :: 29 ( 0 - 40 )

…. and many more

Page 49: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Dash Board – Entire Vendor base (141)

Assessment Score (0 – 40)

> 30 20-30 12-20 < 12

66 32 26 17

Quality and OTD Performance

60-70 70-80 80-90 > 90

Quality 29 41 34 37

OTD - Qty 18 32 45 46

OTD - Time 14 36 49 42

Page 50: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Dash Board – Vendors ( 141 vendors)

Improvement Initiatives penetration

YOY Performance

(Vendors covered) 2010 2011 2012 2013

IT Integrated 14 56 89 117

Vendors under Six

Sigma (SPC accompanies

deliveries)

27 43 59 88

Vendors trained in

Lean Six Sigma 45 87 112 141

Vendors under ISO 59 73 94 136

Lean/JIT

Implementation 35 49 78 132

Plant Inventory

(Rs-Lacs)

Sep’13 Oct’13 Nov’13 Dec’13

646.0 624.0 589.0 563.0

Page 51: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Supplier reward program

• There are two sides of performance improvement

motivation:

– Rewarding the suppliers who perform well so they

will aspire to continue performing well , and

– Correcting Poor Performance : taking corrective

action with those suppliers whose performance

does not meet our expectations.

• It would never be safe to assume that switching

supplier eliminates problems

Page 52: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Establish (KPIs) of all related processes and actions to Accelerate Operational Excellence

• It's crucial to identify a specific set of KPIs that will

help you measure progress and identify areas for

adjustment.

• Equally important to having these measures, however,

is a related system of communication procedures,

processes around the KPIs to ensure that they are

being accurately measured, interpreted,

communicated, and acted upon.

Page 53: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Advice

• Last but not least :

• You’ve got to make sure your suppliers understand how you

define a quality part.

– Avoiding this step appears negatively in your cost of poor

quality metric, and second

The success mantra for getting quality products and maximizing

cost reductions is by working harmoniously with suppliers as if

they’re a trusted partner

They were in business before your relationship and will most likely

be in business after your relationship. That means they do something

well and you’ve got to respect that.

Page 54: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Our other Training Programs In-company as well as Open prog.

• Enhance Productivity & Inventory turns thru Principles and Applications of Lean Manufacturing – 2days

• Vendor Quality Management Systems - 2days

• Operational Excellence - 1day

• Lean Six Sigma - 2 days

• SCM – 1day

• 5S & Visual Control Management - 1day

• Lean and Value Stream Mapping – 2days

• Materials – A profit centre - 2days

Page 55: Training Prog :: Vendor quality Management system-Vendor development

Thank

you H K Varma

9820262986

[email protected]