Upload
haobinliu
View
112
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Design Stage
Evaluating storyboards
Design 1:
Test Name Expected
Outcomes
Actual
Outcomes
Comments/improvements
needed?
Does the video have a title? Yes Yes
Does it give a clear
description of the
percutaneous coronary
intervention?
Yes Yes
Does it contain at least 10
facts?
Yes Should be
yes (have
not written
in details)
Does it have a good control of
the length of each scene?
Yes Yes
Does it contain a combination
of text, image and scene?
Yes Yes
Does it have sound? Yes Yes
Does it have a background
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Yes
Do the texts have too
large/small font size?
No No
Does it last longer than two
minutes?
Yes Yes
Does it last longer than six
minutes?
No No
Is the information too difficult
to understand?
No No
Is it scientific enough? Yes Yes
It there only text on screen? No No
Do you think that the
background sound is
uncoordinated to the scene?
No
Does it compare the
percutaneous coronary
intervention with the other
similar technologies?
Yes Yes
Does it talk about another
technology in details?
No No
Do you think the video is too
serious?
No No
Is the information in the
video useful?
Yes Yes
Design 2:
Test Name Expected
Outcomes
Actual
Outcomes
Comments/improvements
needed?
Does the video have a title? Yes Yes
Does it give a clear
description of the
percutaneous coronary
intervention?
Yes Yes
Does it contain at least 10
facts?
Yes Yes
Does it have a good control of
the length of each scene?
Yes Yes
Does it contain a combination
of text, image and scene?
Yes Yes
Does it have sound? Yes Yes
Does it have a background
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Yes
Do the texts have too
large/small font size?
No No
Does it last longer than two
minutes?
Yes Yes
Does it last longer than six
minutes?
No No
Is the information too difficult
to understand?
No No
Is it scientific enough? Yes No It might be a little bit confusing.
It is not a very good choice to
introduce PCI in chatting.
It there only text on screen? No No
Do you think that the
background sound is
uncoordinated to the scene?
No
Does it compare the
percutaneous coronary
intervention with the other
similar technologies?
Yes No
Does it talk about another
technology in details?
No Yes It does not compare PCI with
other technologies, but it
explains in details about different
types of angioplasty which is
useless here.
Do you think the video is too
serious?
No No
Is the information in the
video useful?
Yes Yes
Design 3:
Test Name Expected
Outcomes
Actual
Outcomes
Comments/improvements
needed?
Does the video have a title? Yes Yes
Does it give a clear
description of the
percutaneous coronary
intervention?
Yes Yes
Does it contain at least 10
facts?
Yes Yes
Does it have a good control of
the length of each scene?
Yes Yes
Does it contain a combination
of text, image and scene?
Yes Yes
Does it have sound? Yes Yes
Does it have a background
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Yes
Do the texts have too
large/small font size?
No No
Does it last longer than two
minutes?
Yes Yes
Does it last longer than six
minutes?
No No
Is the information too difficult
to understand?
No No
Is it scientific enough? Yes Yes
It there only text on screen? No No
Do you think that the
background sound is
No
uncoordinated to the scene?
Does it compare the
percutaneous coronary
intervention with the other
similar technologies?
Yes Yes It has compared PCI with the
other technologies very well
because it highlights the
advantages of PCI.
Does it talk about another
technology in details?
No No
Do you think the video is too
serious?
No Maybe yes It is always talking about the
technology.
Is the information in the
video useful?
Yes Yes
Design 4:
Test Name Expected
Outcomes
Actual
Outcomes
Comments/improvements
needed?
Does the video have a title? Yes Yes
Does it give a clear
description of the
percutaneous coronary
intervention?
Yes Yes
Does it contain at least 10
facts?
Yes Yes
Does it have a good control of
the length of each scene?
Yes No The first scene is not very
important, but it is too long
Does it contain a combination Yes Yes
of text, image and scene?
Does it have sound? Yes Yes
Does it have a background
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Yes
Do the texts have too
large/small font size?
No No
Does it last longer than two
minutes?
Yes Yes
Does it last longer than six
minutes?
No No
Is the information too difficult
to understand?
No No
Is it scientific enough? Yes No
It there only text on screen? No No
Do you think that the
background sound is
uncoordinated to the scene?
No
Does it compare the
percutaneous coronary
intervention with the other
similar technologies?
Yes No
Does it talk about another
technology in details?
No No
Do you think the video is too
serious?
No No
Is the information in the
video useful?
Yes Yes
Evaluating the chosen design
My chosen design is Design 1. I choose it because it is my favourite design, which has a
clear storyline and meets all the specifications. This design gives a clear description of the
percutaneous coronary intervention, showing its advantages by comparing it with the other
similar technologies, and it also remembers not to talk about another technology in details,
otherwise it will make the audience fell confused. Moreover, I think Design 1 is a good
choice for me to make my product, because it is introducing the technology through a story,
instead of just give scientific explanations of the use of the chosen technology. Furthermore,
this design includes a combination of text, images, and animation, which will make the
product much more interesting.
Aiming to create a better product, I also decide to put some elements from the other
three designs into Design 1. For example, I would like to use a rule of narrator in the story to
explain to the audience in a more direct way, just like what I did in Design 3. Furthermore, I
might use one person’s point of view to make the audience identify with the characters, as
the method I utilised in Design 4. According to me, all four of my designs could be improved
much more; nevertheless, I think Design 1 I the best one in these four, and perhaps I can still
keep the advantages of the other three, trying to put them into Design 1, if they will fit. I will
try to keep developing my chosen design till the day I start to film it.
Plan Stage
GANTT Chart
Prototype design 1Prototype design 2Prototype design 3Prototype design 4
Evaluation of DesignsGANTT Chart
Step-by-step PlanCreate Product
Inviting the ActorsPreparation of Film
Create the Title PageFilming scene 1
Filling the gap between scene 1 & 2Filming scene 2Filming secne 3
Making Short AnimationsFilming scene 4Filming scene 5
Put the Scenes TogetherAdd Sounds to the Film
Check the Finished ProductProcess Journal
Test PlanEvaluate
Contingency TimeFeedback
Improving the Product
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
This is a Gantt chart which aims to show how I will organise the time for my designs and
the product. In the left hand side of the Gantt Chart, I have listed 27 different tasks. Those
are the important tasks that I need to do in this section. Moreover, the small red bars are
showing the starting time, finishing time, and duration for each of the tasks. From the Gantt
Chart, it is easy to see that I plan to spend 12 hours on actually making the product; and it
will takes me about 25 hours to finish the whole section of work. The reason why I make this
Gantt Chart is that it presents the time which I should take to finish the product, reminding
me about every small sections in this stage, and it can help me to get myself organised. The
Gantt Chart reminds me about the process rate.
Step-by-step Plan
Date Time
taken
Task Tools/materials
used
11.7.2013 (lesson) 1 Make a GANTT Chart Excel, Word
11.12.2013 (lesson) 1 Do a step-by-step plan Word
11.12.2013 0.5 Invite the actors
Briefly introduce my story to the
actors, explaining what they need
to do
Pen, paper, and the
storyboard design
11.14.2013 (lesson) 1 Prepare for making the film
Write up a script of scene
Open Windows Movie Maker,
starting to create a title page
Save it on the computer and USB
Firefox,
Word/paper,
Windows Movie
Maker, USB
11.16.2013 (at
home)
2 Filming scene 1: a woman is
watering her flowers, and then
she falls down immediately
Filming scene 2: the woman is
brought to hospital, and her
daughter comes to see her
Filling the gap between scene 1
and scene 2 using Movie Maker
Find some sound effects
Camera, PC,
Windows Movie
Maker, Imaxthon
Explorer
11.17.2013 (at
home)
2 Filming scene 3: the conversation
between the doctor and the
Camera, PC,
Windows Movie
Maker, Flash maker,
woman’s daughter
Add short animations to the video
Find some similar products and try
to get suggestions from them
Imaxthon Explorer
11.19.2013 (lesson) 1 On the internet, find some videos
that introduce the procedure of
angioplasty or PCI
Firefox, YouTube
11.19.2013 (at
home)
1 Filming scene 4: the procedure of
percutaneous coronary
intervention
Camera, white
cover, Imaxthon
Explorer
11.21.2013 (lesson) 1 Filming scene 5 in the school (try
to use the roof as a background
scene
Add an ending page to the video
using Windows Movie Maker
Camera, tripod,
Firefox, Windows
Movie Maker
11.23.2013 (at
home)
1 Put all the five scenes together in
a video
Fill every gap between two scenes
and make them look smooth
Windows Movie
Maker
11.26.2013 (lesson) 1 Add sounds to the film
Add a soft background sound
Add different sound effects
USB, Windows
Movie Maker
11.28.2013 (lesson) 1 Check the product
Make sure it is finished
Windows Movie
Maker, Word
11.30.2013 (at
home)
2 Check the finished product once
again
Use the test plan to examine it to
see whether it is a good product
or not
Windows Movie
Maker, Word
12.1.2013 (at
home)
2 Evaluate the product
Justify what I have done for the
product, and how I did that
See if there is anything that I can
still improve
Think about how I can do even
better next time
Word
In the Step-by-step plan, I have set the date for accomplishing the various tasks; and I
have again mentioned the durations. In the date column, I have also shown that whether the
task should be done in lessons or at home. Regarding the tasks, different from the one I had
in the Gantt Chart, here I have explained each of my tasks in more details, trying to write up
a procedure for them in which is aimed to help me have a better understanding of what I
need to do while I am actually creating the product. For the tools, I have listed all the
programme and software that I will need for that particular task; I also put the materials I
will going to use, such as camera, notebook and paper. I think my Step-by-step plan is clear
and precise; and I will be able to follow my plan to create a good product.
This is not my exactly original plan; I have made some changes after the lesson I started
to make my product, because I realised that my invited actors were my parents, who really
could not help me film it during lesson times. Therefore I had to rearrange my time plan and
move all the filming parts to my own time. And then I put some other works which would
last less time than filming into those days that I would have lessons. Therefore, my present
Step-by-step plan is the above one, which I am now very pleased with. If I could improve it
more, perhaps I will write more details about the tasks, and maybe give more time to film
Scene 4 and Scene 5, which I think that the time is a little bit pressing.