29
Comparing standards: is everything clear? Jackie Nicholson Clinical Nurse Specialist in IV Therapy Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford, Surrey, UK

10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

  • Upload
    wocova

  • View
    370

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Comparing  standards:  is  everything  clear?  Jackie  Nicholson  

Clinical  Nurse  Specialist  in  IV  Therapy                                                                                                                                        Royal  Surrey  County  Hospital      

Guildford,  Surrey,  UK  

Page 2: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

?

Page 3: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Evidence  based  guidelines  save  lives  

Page 4: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Hierarchy of evidence

Page 5: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Meta- analyses , systematic literature reviews or at least three well-designed, randomized controlled trials

At least two well designed randomized controlled trials or a systematic literature review of varied prospective study designs.

One well designed randomized controlled trial or several quasiexperimental designs focussed on the same question. Includes two or more well designed laboratory studies.

Case control or cohort studies, narrative literature reviews or systematic literature reviews based on descriptive or qualitative studies. Includes one well designed laboratory study.

Descriptive studies and information from clinical articles, textbooks or well designed quality improvement projects. Includes generally accepted standard of practice which does not have a research base.

V

Evidence from anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology

 Categories  of  evidence  

Regulations set forth by organizations with oversight for monitoring the standards’ adoption and practice.

Strongly recommended for implementation and strongly supported by well-designed experimental, clinical, or epidemiologic studies.

Strongly recommended for implementation and supported by some experimental, clinical, or epidemiologic studies and a strong theoretical rationale; or an accepted practice supported by limited evidence.

Required by state or federal regulations, rules, or standards.

Suggested for implementation and supported by suggestive clinical or epidemiologic studies or a theoretical rationale.

Represents an unresolved issue for which evidence is insufficient or no consensus regarding efficacy exists.

Page 6: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

  EducaGon  &  training      

  Hand  hygiene  &  asepGc  technique  

  Barrier  PrecauGons  

  SelecGon  of  devices  &  sites      

  Skin  preparaGon,  dressings  and  securement  regimens    

  Replacement  of  devices  and  administraGon  sets  

  Use  of  needlefree  sets  

  ConsideraGon  of  anGbioGc  catheters,  prophylaxis  and  locks  

Elements  to  consider  

Page 7: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Educa0on  &  Training  

RCN   INS   CDC  

Nurses  should  have  ‘validated  competency’  ref  

Nurses    should  undergo  theoreGcal  and  pracGcal  training  in  ………ref  

Pa0ents/caregivers  

demonstraGon,  verbal  and  wriRen  demonstrate  understanding  ref  

Nurses  should  be  competent  in:……  

Nurses    should  be  knowledgeable  about  ……  

Pa0ents/caregivers  

hand  hygiene  (V)  prevenGon  of  infecGon  flow  devices  (V)  immobilisaGon  devices      wriRen  instrucGons  (IV)  

Designate  trained  and  competent  personnel  (IA)  

Educate  healthcare  personnel  regarding:                indicaGons  of  VAD  use                proper  procedures                inserGon  and  maintenance                infecGon  control  measures                                                                                                  (IA)  

Periodically  assess  all  involved  personnel:                  Knowledge,  adherence  to                    guidelines  (IA)  

Page 8: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Hand  hygiene  and  asep0c  technique  

RCN   INS   CDC  

Hand  washing  Visibly  soiled  hands  –  soap  and  water  Alcohol  Hand  rub  

Asep0c  technique  AsepGc  technique  during  infusion  &  VAD  placement  ref  

Hand  washing      Visibly  soiled  or  exposed  to  spore  producing  pathogens  –soap  and  water,    Alcohol  based  hand  rub  preferred  (II)  

Asep0c  technique  Standard  precauGons    or  transmission  -­‐based  precauGons  

Hand    washing  Soap  and  water  or  alcohol  based  hand  rub  (IB)    

Asep0c  technique  AsepGc  technique  for  inserGon  and  care  of  VADs  (IB)    

Page 9: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Barrier  Precau0ons  

RCN   INS   CDC  

General  Single  use  aprons  and  gloves  when  performing  infusion  procedures  

MBP  

No  evidence  to  suggest  that  wearing  a  face  mask  and  cap  during  central  venous  catheter  inserGon  reduces  the  incidence  of  infecGon  (2007  ref)  

If  risk  of  body  fluid  exposure  –  face  mask,  cap  and  eye  protec0on    ref    

General  Standard  precauGons  and  personal  protecGve  equipment  (PPE)  during  infusion  procedures  when  risk  of  exposure  to  body  fluids    

MBP  

MBP  including  cap,  mask,  sterile  gown,  sterile  gloves,  protec0ve  eyewear,  full  body  drape  should  be  used  for  all  CVAD  inserGon,  exchange  and  repair  (II)  

MBP  

MBP  including  cap,  mask,  sterile  gown,  sterile  gloves,  full  body  drape  should  be  used  for  all  CVAD  inserGon  or  guidewire  exchange  (IB)  

Page 10: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Skin  prepara0on,  dressing  and  securement  regimens  

RCN   INS   CDC  

Skin  prepara0on  2%  CHG  &  alcohol  ref    

FricGon  rub  30  seconds,  air  dry  30  seconds  ref  

Skin  (dressing)  2%  CHG  

Dressing  TSM/gauze  

TSM  7  days,  gauze  24  hrs  ref  

Skin  prepara0on  CHG  preferred,  iodine/70%  alcohol  (I)    

CHG  X  <  2  months  (I)  

Skin  (dressing)  CHG  preferred,  iodine/70%  alcohol  (I)    

<  2  months,  povidone  iodine,  remove  with  saline  or  sterile  water  (V)  

Dressing  No  evidence  to  support  TSM  over  gauze  Gauze  if  site  moist  (II)  

TSM  5-­‐7  days,  gauze  2  days  

Skin  prepara0on  PVD  –  70%  alcohol/alcoholic  iodine/alcoholic  CHG  (IB)  

CVAD  -­‐  >  0.5%  alcoholic  CHG  (IA)  

Skin  (dressing)  CVAD  -­‐  >  0.5%  alcoholic  CHG  (IA)  

<  2  months  no  recommendaGon  (unresolved)  

Dressing  TSM  /gauze  (IA)  Gauze  if  site  moist  (II)  

TSM  7  days,  gauze  2  days  (IB)  

Page 11: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Skin  prepara0on,  dressing  and  securement  regimens  

RCN   INS   CDC  

Securement  

                 Sterile  tape                    TSM                    Securement  devices                    Avoid  sutures  ↑  risk                    infecGon                    Sutures  21  days  tunnelled  

cuffed  line                    Sterile  surgical  strips  ref    

Consider  CHG  dressing    > 2  months  (prevent  infecGon)  (I)  

Well  healed  tunnelled  device  may  not  need  dressing  (III)  

Securement  

TSM  alone  not  supported  (III)  No  bandages  (V)  Securement  device  preferred  to  tape  or  sutures  (III)  

Consider  CHG  dressing  > 2  months  (infecGon  rate  ↑)  (IB)  

Cuffed  tunnelled  devices,  no  recommendaGon  (unresolved)  

Securement  

Use  a  sutureless  device  (II)  

Page 12: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Selec0on  of  devices  and  sites  

RCN   INS   CDC  

General  Type  &  length  of  therapy,  paGent’s  condiGon  and  preference  ref    

Smallest  gauge  and  length  for  therapy  ref    

PVDs    3-­‐5  days  

Ideally  a  safety  device  ref    

Winged  device  -­‐  bolus  or  non-­‐vesicants  ref    

Avoid  lower  extremiGes  ref    

Not  suitable  vesicants  or  ↑osmo  

General  Type  and  length  of  therapy,  dwell  Gme,  vascular  integrity,  paGent  preference,  ability  and  resources  available  for  akercare    

Smallest  gauge  and  length,  fewest  lumens,  least  invasive.  

PVDs  <  1  week  (V)  

Safety  device  (V)  

Steel  winged  -­‐  short  term  or  single  dose  (V)  

Avoid  lower  extremiGes  (IA/P)  

Not  suitable  vesicants  or  ↑osmo  

General  Purpose,  duraGon,  known  complicaGons,  experience  of  operator  (IB)  

PVDs    

Avoid  steel  needles  for  vesicant  medicaGon  (IA)  

Upper  extremiGes  (II)  

Page 13: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Selec0on  of  devices  and  sites  

RCN   INS   CDC  

Midline  

Cephalic,  basilic,  median  cubital  ref    

X  vesicants  /↑osmo  

PICC  Ideally  upper  arm  using  US  

Non-­‐tunnelled,  tunnelled,  implantable  device  Balance  risks  ref    Subclavian  preferred  for  non-­‐tunnelled  

Midline  1  –  4  weeks  (V)  

Cephalic,  basilic  brachial  (V)  

X  vesicants/↑osmo  (V)    

PICC  Basilic,  median  cubital,  cephalic  (V)  

Non-­‐tunnelled  device  Balance  risks    Subclavian  site  preferrred  (I)  

Tunnelled  &  implanted  devices  

Collaborate  with  health  care  team  and  paGent  for  site  selecGon  (V)  

Midline/PICC  >  6  days  therapy  

Non-­‐tunnelled  device  Balance  risks  (IA)  Avoid  femoral  site  (IA)  Subclavian  site  preferred  (IB)  

Tunnelled  device  

No  recommendaGon  for  site  for  tunnelled  device  (unresolved)  

Page 14: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Replacement  of  devices  and  administra0on  sets  

RCN   INS   CDC  

PVD  72  –  96  ref  

Midlines  PICCs                                                                                              Tunnelled  devices  Implanted  ports  ?  dwell  Gme  exchange  -­‐  absence  of  infecGon  ref  

Administra0on  sets  

1°/2°  72  hours  ref  IntermiRent  24  hours  ref  Lipid  PN  24  hours                ref  

PVD  

Replace  when  clinically  indicated  (I)  

Midlines  > 4  weeks  clinical  judgement  (V)  

Non  tunnelled,  tunnelled  devices  and  implanted  ports  Dwell  Gme  unknown  (II)  removal  determined  by  complicaGons  (V)  

Administra0on  sets  

1°/2°  96  hours  (II)  IntermiRent  24  hours  (V)  PN  /  other  lipid  24  hours  (III)  

PVD  72  –  96  hours  (IB)  Replacement  when  clinically  indicated  (unresolved)  

Midlines  Replace  only  when  clinically  indicated  (II)  

CVADs  No  rouGne  replacement  (IB)  Do  not  remove  on  basis  of  fever  alone  (II)  Guidewire  exchanges  only  absence  of  infecGon  (IB)  

Administra0on  sets  

1°/2°  96  hours  IA)  IntermiRent  (unresolved)  Lipid  within  24  hours  (1B)  

Page 15: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Replacement  of  devices  and  administra0on  sets  

RCN   INS   CDC  

Blood  –  end  of  transfusion/12  hours  whichever  sooner  ref  

Add  ons  with  administraGon  set  or  when  integrity  compromised  ref  

Hub  as  above  or  blood  in  device  ref  

Propofol  12  hours  (regulatory)  

Blood  4  hours  (IV)  

Add  ons  with  administraGon  set  or  when  integrity  compromised  (V)  

Hub  as  above/residual  blood/  prior  to  blood  culture  (IV)  

Propofol  6  –  12  hours  (IA)  

Blood  within  24  hours  (IB)  

Add  ons  With  administraGon  set,  no  benefit  more  frequently  than  72  hours  (II)  

Page 16: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Use  of  needlefree  sets  

RCN   INS   CDC  

Needlefree  system  preferred  method  of  access  ref  

Disinfec0on  

CHG  &  alcohol  

FricGon,  allow  to  dry  

Needles  shall  not  be  used  for  access  

Needleless  connectors    

Split  septum/mechanical  valve                            negaGve                  posiGve                  neutral                              (II)  

Needleless  connectors  sites  of  microbial  contaminaGon  (II)  

Disinfec0on  

Alcohol/iodine/CHG  &  alcohol  

OpGmal  technique  or  Gme  frame  not  idenGfied  (III)  

Needleless  system  to  access  IV  tubing  (IC)  

Needleless  connectors    

split  septum  valve  ?  preferred                                                                                                  (II)  

(Discussion    p  54-­‐56)  

Disinfec0on  

CHG/  iodine  /70%  alcohol  (IA)  

Scrub  the  access  port  Time  –  3-­‐5  secs  with  70%  alcohol  did  not  disinfect.            

Page 17: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Considera0on  of  an0bio0c  catheters,  prophylaxis  and  locks  

RCN   INS   CDC  

An0microbial  catheters  

Consider  in  ↑  risk  paGents  ref  

An0microbial  catheters  

Consider  > 5 days  /↑  risk  paGents  /CRBSI  rates  not  ↓  aker  other  intervenGons    (I)  

Prophylaxis  Not  rouGne  ?  history  of  CRBSI/  ↑  risk    (I)  

An0microbial  lock  ?  long  term  CVAD  salvage  (Absence  tunnel/port  infecGon)  ?  +  systemic  anGbioGcs  (I)  

An0microbial  catheters  

Consider  if  CRBSIs  not  ↓  aker  other  intervenGons.  (IA)  ?  cost  effecGve                      ICU                    burns                    neutropenia                        ↑  CRBSI  rates  

Prophylaxis  Do  not  give  to  prevent  infecGon  (IB)  

An0microbial  lock  Long  term  CVADs  +  history  of  mulGple  CRBSI  despite  other  intervenGons  (II)  

(Discussion  p  41-­‐43)  

Page 18: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Consensus  

  EducaGon  &  training        Competence  

  Hand  hygiene  &  asepGc  technique    Soap  and  water/alcohol  hand  rub  

  AsepGc  technique  –  VAD  inserGon  and  care  

  Barrier  PrecauGons    MBP  –  all  CVAD  inserGons  

  SelecGon  of  devices  &  sites        Based  on  type  and  length  of  therapy  

  PVDs  upper  extremiGes  

  Non-­‐tunnelled  CVAD  –  subclavian  site  preferred  but  balance  risks  

Page 19: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

  Skin  preparaGon,  dressings  and  securement  regimens      CHG  preferred  -­‐  CVAD  inserGon    

  TSM  or  gauze  

  Avoid  sutures  

  Replacement  of  devices  and  administraGon  sets    Lipid  PN  –  24  hours  

  Change  add  ons  with  administraGon  set  

  Use  of  needlefree  sets    Needlefree  systems  preferred  

  Disinfect  hub  with  anGsepGc  –  Gme  frame  not  idenGfied    

  ConsideraGon  of  anGbioGc  catheters,  prophylaxis  and  locks    Not  for  rouGne  use  but  consider  for  specific  groups  of  paGents  

Consensus  

Page 20: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

  EducaGon  &  training    EducaGon  of  paGents/carers  

  Hand  hygiene  &  asepGc  technique    AsepGc  technique  v  standard  /transmission  based  precauGons  

  Barrier  PrecauGons    Elements  of  MBP  

  Skin  preparaGon,  dressings  and  securement  regimens      %  CHG    CHG  dressing  -­‐  prevenGon  v  intervenGon  

VariaGon  

Page 21: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

  Replacement  of  devices  and  administraGon  sets    PVD  dwell  Gme  -­‐    72-­‐96  hours  v  only  when  clinically  indicated    1°/2°  conGnuous  -­‐  72  v  96  hours  

  Blood  –  4hours,  12  hours,  within  24  hours  

  ConsideraGon  of  anGbioGc  catheters,  prophylaxis  and  locks    AnGbioGc  prophylaxis  when  ↑  risk  factors  v  do  not  give  to  prevent  infecGon    AnGbioGc  lock    -­‐  salvage  infected  long  term  line  v  history  of  repeated  CRBSIs  

VariaGon  

Page 22: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

Further  clarificaGon/research  required    AsepGc  technique    

  DefiniGon/standardisaGon    Technique  and  Gme  frame  hub  disinfecGon  

  Barrier  precauGons    Elements  of  MPB    

  SelecGon  of  devices  and  sites    Dwell  Gme  all  VADs  

  Site  selecGon  tunnelled  devices  

  Skin  preparaGon,  dressings  and  securement  regimens    CHG%    Skin  preparaGon  <  2  months  

  Replacement  of  devices  and  administraGon  sets    Primary  and  secondary  conGnuous  infusion  sets      Blood  administraGon  sets  

Page 23: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren
Page 24: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren
Page 25: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

March  17th  2012  

Page 26: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

2  weeks  later  

Home  16th  April  2012  

Page 27: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

To  summarise    Evidence  based  guidelines  save  lives  

 Wealth  of  evidence  RCN,  INS,  CDC  guidelines  

  Areas  of    Consensus  

  VariaGon    Further  research  and  clarificaGon  

Page 28: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren

The  future?

Page 29: 10.30 11.00 jackie nicholson publiceren