74
MNT for Metabolic Stress: Sepsis, Trauma, Burns, Surgery Noraishah Mohamed Nor Dept Nutrition Sc. IIUM

2.mnt for metabolic stress burn

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1. Noraishah Mohamed NorDept Nutrition Sc. IIUM

2. Metabolic Stress Trauma MVA, gunshot, stab wound, falls, burns Major cause of death and disability Active systemic response, depend on: Pts age, previous health status, preexisting diseases, type of infection, presence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) There are many metabolic changes that occur inpatients who are critically ill (eg sepsis, trauma) 3. Important to understand these changes when implementing nutritional therapy Once the systemic response is activated, the physiologic and metabolic changes that follow are similar and may lead to septic shock Ebb phase initial response to bodily insult, occur immediately following injury (short term) Flow phase neuroendocrine response to physiologic stress following the ebb phase (long term) 4. Metabolic response during stress: Metabolic response to stress (tissue injury, infection) is divided into the ebb and flow phaseEnergy expenditure Flow Phase Ebb Phase Time 5. In the ebb phase, the body shuts down and the metabolic rate decreases Leads to hypovolemic shock: Blood pressure Cardiac output Body temperature tissue perfusion O2 consumption metabolic rate Bodys protective response (eg to blood loss) 6. However, once the blood pressure is stabilized, the flow (recovery)phase begins Divided into 2 response: Acute Response: catabolism predominates glucocorticoids glucagon catecholamines Release cytokines, lipid mediators Acute phase protein (CRP) N2 excretion metabolic rate O2 consumptions Impaired fuel utillization Adaptive Response: Anabolism predominates Hormonal response gradually diminished hypermetabolic rate Assoc with recovery Restore body protein Wound healing 7. Metabolic changes in the stressed (critically illpatient): Energy metabolism Protein metabolism Carbohydrate metabolism Fat metabolism Others 8. In the acute response metabolism is increased which requires energy However, the method of producing energy is different to that of a normal state or in periods of fasting (simple starvation) 9. Energy production in a normal(non fasting state) Usually E is from carbohydrates from normal intake Complex carbohydrate is broken down into glucose (preferred substrate for the brain) Excess carbohydatre mainly converted to fat and stored in adipose tissue 10. Metabolic Response to Fasting IIIIIIIVVGLUCOSE UTILIZED (g/hora)40ExogenousGlycogenGluconeogenesis302010LEGEND I IIIII IV VFUEL FORGLUCOSE, GLUCOSE,BRAIN GLUCOSE GLUCOSE GLUCOSEKETONESKETONESRuderman NB. Annu Rev Med 1975;26:248 11. Metabolic Changes in Starvation 12. Metabolic Response to Trauma Nitrogen Excretion (g/day) 13. Starvation vs. Stress Metabolic response to stress differs from the responses to starvation. Starvation = decreased energy expenditure, use of alternative fuels, decreased protein wasting, stored glycogen used in 24 hours Late starvation = fatty acids, ketones, and glycerol provide energy for all tissues except brain, nervous system, and RBCs 14. Hypermetabolic statestress causes accelerated energy expenditure, glucose production, glucose cycling in liver and muscle Hyperglycemia can occur either from insulin resistance or excess glucose production via gluconeogenesis and Cori cycle. Muscle breakdown also accelerated 15. Hormonal Stress Response Aldosteronecorticosteroid that causes renalsodium retention Antidiuretic hormone (ADH)stimulates renaltubular water absorption These conserve water and salt to support circulatingblood volume 16. ACTHacts on adrenal cortex to release cortisol(mobilizes amino acids from skeletal muscles) Catecholaminesepinephrine and norepinephrinefrom renal medulla to stimulate hepaticglycogenolysis, fat mobilization, gluconeogenesis 17. Cytokines Interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) Released by phagocytes in response to tissue damage, infection, inflammation, and some drugs and chemicals 18. Nutrition Care Prevent PEM and possible complication of nutritionsupport Nutritional status prior to current illness is animportant predictor of morbidity and mortality The level of injury will determine the level ofmetabolic stress The Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) score are usuallyused in critical ill pt. 19. Nutrition Intervention Oral route is the preferred route to meet therequirements However, for critically ill pt, usually the requirementonly can be met via EN or PN There is evidence to support early initiation of nutritionsupport with specific metabolically stressed : acutepancreatitis, head injury and burns. EN should be consider first before PN 20. Definition Sepsis: an uncontrolled inflammatory response to infection or trauma (immunosuppressive response to infection) Septic shock: hypotension not reversed with fluid resuscitation and assoc with organ dysfx SIRS: not necessarily caused by infection, may occur after major surgery or trauma or with other condition such as myocardial infraction MODS: result from the complications of sepsis or SIRS; define as the present of the altered fx of 2 or > organs in acutely ill pt 21. Diagnosis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS): Site of infection established and at least two of thefollowing are present: Body temperature >38 C or 90 beats/minute Respiratory rate >20 breaths/min (tachypnea) PaCO2 12,000/mm3 or 10% bands (immature neutrophils)in the absence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia andleukopenia May be caused by bacterial translocation Diagnostic criteria for MODS and pathopysiology refer handout 22. Bacterial Translocation Changes from acute insult to the gastrointestinal tract that may allow entry of bacteria from the gut lumen into the body; associated with a systemic inflammatory response that may contribute to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome Well documented in animals, may not occur to the same extent in humans Early enteral feeding is thought to prevent this 23. Factors to Consider in Screening anICU Patient: ICU medical admission Diagnosis, nutritional status, organ function,pharmacologic agents Postoperative ICU admission Type of Surgery, intraoperative complications, nutritional status, diagnosis, sepsis/SIRS Burn or trauma admission Type of trauma, extent of injury, GI function 24. ASPEN Guidelines ASPEN (American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition) Objectives of optimal metabolic and nutritional support in injury, trauma, burns, sepsis: 1. Detect and correct preexisting malnutrition 2. Prevent progressive protein-calorie malnutrition 3. Optimize patients metabolic state by managing fluidand electrolytes 25. NUTRITIONALASSESSMENT Traditional methods not adequate/reliable Urine urea nitrogen (UUN) excretion in gms per day may be used to evaluate degree of hypermetabolism: 0 5 = normometabolism 5 10 = mild hypermetabolism (level 1 stress) 10 15 = moderate (level 2 stress) >15 = severe (level 3 stress) 26. Determination of NutrientRequirements Energy Protein Vitamins, Minerals, Trace Elements Non-protein Calorie Carbohydrate Fat 27. Energy Enough but not too much Excess calories: Hyperglycemia Diuresis complicates fluid/electrolyte balance Hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) Excess CO2 production Exacerbate respiratory insufficiency Prolong weaning from mechanical ventilation 28. Predictive Equations for Estimation ofEnergy Needs in Critical Care Harris-Benedict x 1.3-1.5 for stress ASPEN Guidelines: 25 30 calories per kg per day* Ireton-Jones Equations** Penn State equations Swinamer equation *ASPEN Board of Directors. JPEN 26;1S, 2002 ** Ireton-Jones CS, Jones JD. Why use predictive equations for energy expenditure assessment? JADA 97(suppl):A44, 1997. **Wall J, Ireton-Jones CS, et al. JADA 95(suppl):A24, 1995. 29. Harris-Benedict Equation(HBE) InjuryStress Factor Minor surgery1.00 1.10Energy requirements for Long bone fracture 1.15 1.30patient with cancer in bed Cancer 1.10 1.30 HBE = BEE x 1.10 x 1.2 Peritonitis/sepsis 1.10 1.30 Severe infection/multiple trauma 1.20 1.40 Multi-organ failure syndrome 1.20 1.40 Burns1.20 2.00 Activity Activity Factor Confined to bed1.2 Out of bed 1.3ADA: Manual Of Clinical Dietetics. 5th ed. Chicago: American Dietetic Association; 1996Long CL, et al. JPEN 1979;3:452-456 30. Ireton-Jones 1997 EquationsVentilator-Dependent Patients: EEE = 1784 11(A) + 5(W) + 244(G) + 239(T) +804(B)Spontaneously-Breathing Patients: EEE = 629 11(A) + 25(W) 609(O) 31. Where: A = age in years W = weight (kg) O = presence of obesity >30% above IBW (0 =absent, 1 = present) G = gender (female = 0, male = 1) T = diagnosis of trauma (absent = 0, present = 1) B = diagnosis of burn (absent = 0, present = 1) EEE = estimated energy expenditure 32. Penn State Equation 1998 version: RMR = BMR (1.1) + VE (32) + Tmax(140) - 5340 2003a version: RMR = BMR (0.85) + VE (33) +Tmax (175) 6433 Equations use BMR calculated using the Harris- Benedict equation, minute ventilation (VE) in liters per min (L/min), and maximum temperature (Tmax) in degrees Celsius. 33. Swinamer Equation EE = 945 (BSA) - 6.4 (age) + 108 (T) + 24.2 (breaths/min) + 81.7 (VT) 4349 Equation uses body surface area (BSA) in squared meters (m2), temperature (T) in degrees Celsius, and tidal volume (VT) in liters per minute (L/min). 34. Estimation of RMR inObesity Harris-Benedict using actual weight x 1.2 (60% of subjects predicted within 10% of RMR) or an adjusted weight x 1.3 (67% of subjects predicted within 10% of RMR) resulted in the most accurate predictions. Penn State 2003a equation predicts within 10% of RMR in 61% of subjects, the Penn State 1998 equation predicts within 10% of RMR in 67% of subjects Ireton-Jones, 1992 equations predict within 10% of RMR in 72% of subjects. 35. Recommendations forPredicting RMR in Critically IllPts HBE should not be used to predict RMR in critically ill patients Ireton-Jones 1997 should not be used to predict RMR in critically ill patients Ireton-Jones 1992 may be used to predict RMR in critically ill pts but errors will occur. ADA Evidence Analysis Library, 10-06 36. ProteinStress Level No Stress Moderate StressSevere StressCalorie:Nitrogen Ratio> 150:1 150-100:1< 100:1Percent Potein / Total< 15%15-20% > 20% proteinCaloriesproteinproteinProtein / kg Body Weight0.81.0-1.2 g/kg/day 1.5-2.0 g/kg/dayg/kg/day 37. What Weight Do You Use? Actual weight may be inaccurate in trauma and burnpatients who have been fluid resuscitated Usual weights may not be available There is no validation for the common practice of usingan adjusted body weight for obese patients when usingHarris-Benedict since Harris-Benedict equations werederived from studies done on healthy people of all sizes Ireton-Jones uses actual weight in her equations andthen adjusts for obesity 38. Lean body mass is highly correlated with actual weight inpersons of all sizes Studies have shown that determination of energy needsusing adjusted body weight becomes increasinglyinaccurate as BMI increases However, some studies suggest that high proteinhypocaloric feedings in obese patients may betherapeutically useful Because overfeeding is more problematic thanunderfeeding, could possibly use adjusted weight or 20-21kcal/kg actual BW in obese pts 39. Specialized Nutrients in CriticalCare Include supplemental branched chain amino acids, glutamine, arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, RNA, others Most studies used more than one nutrient, making assessment of efficacy of specific supplements impossible Immune-enhancing formulas may reduce infectious complications in critically ill pts but not alter mortality Mortality may actually be increased in some subgroups (septic patients) 40. Timing of Enteral Nutrition andCritical Illness If the critically ill patient is adequately fluidresuscitated, then EN should be started within 24 to48 hours following injury or admission to the ICU. Early EN is associated with a reduction in infectiouscomplications and may reduce LOS. The impact of timing of EN on mortality has not beenadequately evaluated. 41. Monitoring Response to MNT inCritical Care Pts: Blood Glucose Hyperglycemia (up to 200-220 mg/dl) in critically illpatients was once considered acceptable Recent studies suggest hyperglycemia is associated withinfection, morbidity, mortality New goal is to keep BG as close to normal as possible.Target: 10 to 20%over baseline values)] 57. Hart et al (2001) found that a high-carbohydrate diet, with 3% fat, 82% carbohydrates and 15% protein, stimulated protein synthesis, increased endogenous insulin production and improved lean body mass accretion compared to high-fat diet. 58. Vitamins & Minerals Supplementation Evidence-based guidelines for micronutrientsupplementation are limited Vit C- collagen formation and antioxidant defense in theimmune system and is involved in ATP production (66mg/kg/h during the first 24 hours) Vit A immune fx & epithelialization (1000 IU/1000kcal) Na & K restore via fluid therapy Ca depression reduced with earlier ambulation &excersize Supp PO4 & Mg parenterally (to avoid GI irritation) Zn supp 220mg Zn sulphate ( co fac in Vit E metab) 59. Methods of Nutritional Support Pt with 40) Refeeding syndrome Severe malnutrition Trauma patients following shock resuscitation Hemodynamic instability Acute respiratory distress syndrome or COPD MODS, SIRS or sepsis Aggressive protein provision (1.5-2.0 gm/kg/day 68. Although overfeeding surgical patients should beavoided, prolonged underfeeding may be equallyconcerning. This can compromise immune function, delay woundhealing, exacerbate muscle wasting, and prolong therecovery of nitrogen balance and visceral protein levels. However, short-term hypocaloric feeding with 1-2 g ofprotein per kilogram per day, particularly in the acutephase of postoperative stress, may reduce metaboliccomplications while supporting a reduction in negative