View
382
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation was given by Philippe Adam, John de Wit and Dean Murphy (NCHSR) at the AFAO HIV Educators Conference 2010.
Citation preview
Bridging the gap between research and prevention: a translational approach
Philippe Adam, John de Wit
& Dean Murphy
Issue
Contribution of behavioural research Mapping sexual and risk practices within various
networks or communities Understanding the meanings associated with
these practices
Issue
Research provides input for HIV prevention It illuminates what the problem is, what
population groups need to be targeted and how these individuals feel about the issue
It doesn’t really tell what specific content campaigns or interventions need to have
Issue
The research input can be seen as sufficient Prevention ‘packages’ are available to promote
HIV testing, condom use or risk reduction strategies
Do these packages suffice?
Issue
The Australian response is outstanding but there is still work to be done Ongoing STI and HIV epidemics Rates of (regular) HIV testing lower than
expected Risk taking is likely to be increasing
The context has definitely changed!
Current challenges for HIV prevention
What needs to be doneto improve HIV prevention?
New techniquesneeded?
New framework needed?
Increasing reach YES
Increasing intensity of reach YES
Increasing quality of intervention content
YES
Impact = Reach x Intensity x Quality
YES !
How to further strengthen quality?
No magic bullet! The content of prevention programs needs to be
constantly re-created Micro-theories of change based on an
understanding of the processes conducive to sexual risk and protection and regarding the possible ways to influence these processes can be used
Revisiting some basic assumptions
Assumptions Proposed revision
We know which groups to target
YES but population groups created by research should not be reified.
Gay men are so rational!
YES gay men can make rational calculations but what about the decisions we take in the ‘heat of the moment’?
We know why gay men act the way they do
NOT REALLY. Research has only explored a few of the factors influencing gay men’s behaviour.
Individuals do not change
NOT TRUE. Most of us continue to have the willingness and the ability to change
New forms of partnership needed!
Research and prevention need to explore new forms of partnership to revisit some of our assumptions and complement current HIV prevention frameworks
An example of a translational partnership project aimed at understanding and reducing unplanned sexual with taking with partners met online
Findings from the literature
Gay men who use the internet to find partners are more likely to engage in unprotected sex This phenomenon is not well explained, except
by the notion that gay men may access larger numbers of sex partners through the internet, which includes men seeking unprotected anal intercourse
The Cybersex project
Country Year N Partner
France 2004 Online cross-sectional survey
2,058 SNEG Prevention,with support of the Ministry of Health
France 2009-2010
Confirmatory online cross-sectional survey + Online experimental intervention tested for efficacy in an RCT protocol
507 SNEG Prevention,with support of the Ministry of Health
Research findings (1)
Most gay participants in France do not intentionally go online to find a partner for unprotected sex.
However, gay men often accept to engage in online fantasizing about unprotected sex
Even among men who do not intend to take risk when they go online, risk-taking is promoted by online fantasizing about unprotected sex
Research findings
Contributing factors
Compartmentalisation - Many men think that their online conduct doesn’t have consequences in real life
Escalation - People often say things online that do not reflect what they would expect or want to do IRL
Negotiation - After a hot chat, people often forget to renegotiate prevention prior to having sex
Intervention framework
Contributing factors to be addressed
Proposed strategy
Compartmentalisation - Many men think that their online conduct doesn’t have consequences in real life
Increasing awareness around the potential effects of fantasising about unprotected sex on IRL behaviours
Escalation - People often say things online that do not reflect what they would expect or want to do IRL
Promoting self-regulation so that people do not say things that are too disconnected from what they want
Negotiation - After a hot chat, people often forget to renegotiate prevention prior to having sex
Promoting negotiation of practices prior to having sex with the partner(s).
Experimental intervention
An online intervention tested for efficacy (RCT)
507 eligible participants Participants exposed to the intervention more
often believed that it is important self-regulate one’s online conduct and to renegotiate prevention online before meeting the partner(s)
The intervention also increased the intention to engage in these behaviors in the future
Limitations of the French project
Cross sectional design Little attention to non-condom risk reduction
strategies Other modes of chatting than fantasising Validity of the intervention model in other
contexts?
The Cybersex project - Australia
Country Year N Partner
Australia
2010 Online prospective study(in preparation)
[750] AFAO, ACON and Positive Life NSW, with the support of NSW health
Objectives (2)
To derive recommendations and possible strategies for novel online HIV prevention in Australia that: Increases awareness among MSM of the
dynamics of online chatting and IRL behavioural outcomes
Supports men to better self-regulate their online conduct to prevent unplanned sexual risk-taking.
Conclusion
New forms of collaboration between research and prevention activities are important to explore.
Innovation can be expected from translational projects that capitalise on a continuous exchange between research and prevention.
This exchange will identify and produce new knowledge and frameworks that are key to contemporary effective HIV prevention.
Conclusion
Contrary to a widely held belief, most individuals have the ability to change some aspects of their conduct and are willing to do so.
There is no contradiction between facilitating these changes and respecting people’s lifestyles.