70
بسمن الرحيم الرحم

Dr ahmed esawy 10 bowel virtual colonoscopy vc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

بسم هللا الرحمن الرحيم

Dr. Ahmed Abdallah Eisawy

MBBS M.Sc MD

VIRTUAL

COLONOSCOPY

Virtual colonoscopy

New Imaging Technique

• Volumetric CT or MRI data

Processed to

Virtual endoscopic images of the

colon Main Application:

Early detection of colorectal

cancer

CT Virtual Colonoscopy

Means

CT Colonography +

Volumetric data + Specialized Imaging software

Image Display

2D and 3D Why ??

• The best polyp detection by CTC occurs with

combined 2D and 3D images.

• Diagnosis of lipoma by 2D. • Decrease falsies :

-Fecal matter. -Barium remnants.

-Respiratory misregistration.

-Diverticulum with fecal matter or barium

Advantages of this procedure:

Visualization of the entire colon.

High diagnostic accuracy for polyps larger than

1 cm in diameter.

Ability to assess extracolonic abdominal and

pelvic organs.

Potential diagnostic test for colorectal cancer.

Virtual Colonoscopy Technique

The Advantages of Multi-slice

Scanning

• 1-Improved Temporal Resolution.

• 2-Improved Spatial Resolution in the Z-Axis.

• 3-Increased Concentration of Intravascular Contrast Material.

• 4-Decreased Image Noise.

• 5-Efficient X-ray Tube Use.

• 6-Longer Anatomic Coverage.

Patient preparation Spasmolytics. Intravenous contrast: Colon air insufflation Bowel cleansing

- No contrast. - IV contrast.

Technique of Virtual colonoscopy

Colon air insufflation Bowel cleansing

CONTRAST FOR VC IS AIR

.

Technique of Virtual

colonoscopy

• Digital Subtraction

• Patient imaged in both

• - Supine. – Prone

Why?Increase examination

• Volume Data Management : acquisition,resampling & editting

• Image Display:2D & 3D images

Image Display:

- 2D image display.

- 3D image display.

Conventional colonoscopy: The gold standard for detection of colonic

neoplasms.

Visualize the colonic mucosa.

Colonoscopic polypectomy.

fails to reach the coecum in 5-10% of

average risk.

Significant miss rates for adenomas less

than 1 cm.

Invasive test.

Requires sedation.

Risk of perforation.

CT or MR colonography:

Better image resolution.

Shorter examination and

interpretation times.

No ionizing x-rays

Fly-through Technique

• The computations that guide the motion guide the

dynamic point of view representing a virtual volume.

VC Compared To

Conventional Colonoscopy

Advantages

• No sedation

• No analgesia

• Least intervention.

• Occlusive carcinoma.

• Extra-luminal lesion.

• Post irradiation.

Disadvantages

• Flat adenoma.

• Small polyp

• No therapy

Sensitivity of Virtual Colonoscopy

for the detection of colorectal

masses Virtual

Colonscopy:

• 93.8% for polyps at

least 10 mm.

• 93.9% for polyps at

least 8mm.

• 88.7% for polyps at

least 6mm.

Conventional Colonoscopy:

• 87.5% for polyps at least 10 mm.

• 91% for polyps at least 8 mm.

• 92.3% for polyps at least 6 mm.

Compared To

Barium Enema Radiography

Advantages

• No Barium • Little effect from retained

fluid.

• No complex overlapping of

radiographic lines.

• Infinite No. of projections on

demand

• No 2ry cathartic preparation

prior to colonoscopy

Disadvantages

• More cost.

Classification of Colorectal

Masses Non-Neoplastic Polyps Hyperplastic polyps

Hamartomas

Reactive polyps

Neoplastic Polyps:

Benign Polyps

Malignant Polyps

Tubular adenoma

Villous adenoma

Tubulovillous adenoma

Adenocarcinoma

Carcinoid tumour

Classification of Colorectal Masses

Mesenchymal lesions:

Benign

Malignant

· Leiomyoma

· Lipoma

· Neuroma

· Haemangioma

· Leiomyosarcoma

· Liposarcoma

· Malignant stromal tumour

· Kaposi’s sarcoma

Colorectal masses by Virtual Colonoscopy

Tubular adenoma

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view

from CT colonography

shows a rounded, 6-mm

sessile polyp located on

a colonic fold.

• (b) Digital photograph

from same-day optical

colonoscopy shows the

matching sessile polyp.

Tubulovillous

adenoma.

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT

colonography shows a sessile, lobulated 20-mm polyp extending from a colonic fold.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows the same lobulated lesion. Note the adjacent calibrated guidewire, which provides more accurate endoscopic measurement than

open biopsy forceps estimation.

Tubulovillous

adenoma

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows a 10-mm pedunculated polyp with a well-defined stalk.

• (b) Axial 2D view shows the same pedunculated polyp (arrowhead). Unlike most other pedunculated lesions, which are more easily recognized as such on 3D views, the stalk and polyp in this case happen to be aligned in a standard 2D plane.

Villous adenoma • (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT

colonography shows a 5-cm irregular cecal mass. This papillary appearance is highly suggestive of a villous tumor.

• (b) Axial 2D image (without electronic cleansing of opacified fluid) shows the same irregular cecal mass (arrowheads).

• (c) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows the papillary, frondlike nature of the mass to greater advantage. The lesion was not malignant despite its large size.

Flat adenoma

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows a relatively subtle flat lesion (arrowheads) near the anal verge. This adenoma was missed at prospective colonoscopy before the CT colonographic results were revealed.

• (b) Corresponding axial 2D image helps confirm a flat rectal lesion (arrow).

CTC can not detect flat adenoma

(raised < 2mm from surface)

Malignant polyp

• (a) Axial 2D view shows a

relatively flat 4-cm mass in the

cecum.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical

colonoscopy shows the same

polypoid mass, which was

malignant but not yet invasive at

histologic evaluation.

Colorectal carcinoma.

Colonic carcinoma, apple core (Cont.).

Obstructing cancer in the sigmoid colon.

Malignant polyp

Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography in a symptomatic

patient shows a large sessile mass, which proved to be

malignant.

Invasive

adenocarcinoma

• (a) Contrast material-enhanced 2D curved reformatted image with soft-tissue windowing shows an annular-constricting mass with shouldering (arrowheads) involving the sigmoid colon. Cross-sectional 2D views are much more effective than endoluminal displays for depicting invasive mass lesions.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows the proximal aspect of the mass.

Occlusive

adenocarcinoma • (a) Contrast-enhanced 2D coronal CT

image with soft-tissue windowing shows an annular sigmoid mass (arrowheads). The endoscope could not be passed beyond the lesion to evaluate the proximal colon.

• (b) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows a synchronous 15-mm polyp on a fold in the ascending colon. Although the 2D views are better for evaluating the invasive primary tumor, 3D views remain valuable for detecting proximal synchronous lesions.

Nonneoplastic Mucosal Lesions

Pedunculated Polyp (6mm) in sigmoid colon.

Two 1.5 cm sigmoid polyps.

7-mm polyp in sigmoid colon.

Hyperplastic polyp

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows a 7-mm sessile soft-tissue lesion, which is indistinguishable from an adenomatous polyp.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows the same sessile polyp. Reliable distinction from an adenomatous polyp requires histologic analysis.

Hyperplastic polyp

(a) Endoluminal 3D view shows a

large 11-mm sessile polyp.

Bulky hyperplastic lesions of

this size are relatively rare.

(b) Digital photograph from optical

colonoscopy shows the same

hyperplastic polyp.

Mucosal polyp

(normal epithelium).

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography that simulates a retroflexed rectal view at colonoscopy shows a tiny 3-mm polyp (arrow). Note tip of a rectal catheter. Almost all mucosal polyps are diminutive and therefore will not influence management.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows measurement of the diminutive 3-mm lesion with the calibrated wire.

Juvenile polyp.

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography in an asymptomatic 57-year-old man shows a pedunculated 15-mm polyp extending from a fold in the rectosigmoid region. The polyp was a solitary finding in this case.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows the same polyp

Submucosal Lesions

• "Don’t Touch" Lesions at CT Colonography

Lymphoid polyps.

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT

colonography shows multiple small polypoid lesions (arrowheads). These lymphoid aggregates are typically diminutive and therefore do not affect patient management.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows one of these lesions in the foreground.

Colonic lipoma

• .

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows a large polyp extending from a fold.

• (b) Axial 2D view with soft-tissue windowing shows that the lesion has fat attenuation (arrowhead), a finding diagnostic of a lipoma.

• (c) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows the same lipoma.

Seen by : 3D and Diagnosed by: 2D

Colonic lipoma

Colonic lipoma (2.5-cm diameter)

Pneumatosis

cystoides coli.

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from

CT colonography shows multiple polypoid lesions. Note that some lesions are "shelled out" and appear more like diverticula.

• (b) Axial 2D image shows that these lesions all represent thin-walled, air-filled cysts. Localized subserosal dissection of air surrounds this bowel loop, but no free intraperitoneal air was present.

Anorectal Lesions

Internal hemorrhoids

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows a large, circumferential mass at the anorectal junction that surrounds the rectal catheter.

• (b) Digital photograph from optical colonoscopy shows internal hemorrhoids, which are at least partially thrombosed, surrounding the colonoscope. Most cases are not this prominent.

Hypertrophied

anal papilla

• Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows two, rounded polypoid

lesions at or near the anal verge. If no other large polyps are seen

proximally, suspected anal papillae can be confirmed with simple anoscopy

or a digital rectal examination.

CTC Problems , Pitfalls &

Pseudolesions: 1)Perceptive error:

-commonest cause of false negative

- decrease with observer experience.

2)Fluid-filled segments.

3)Collapsed segments.

4)Fecal matter. But

Supine and prone study -------- minimize these

falsies

5)Small polyps overlooked 6)Flat adenomas not seen

7)Ileocecal valve.

8)Respiratory misregistration.

CTC Problems , Pitfalls &

Pseudolesions:

Retained fecal

material

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view from

CT colonography shows a

large sessile polypoid lesion.

• (b) Axial 2D view shows that

the lesion is internally tagged

with barium (arrowhead),

diagnostic of retained stool.

Prominent colonic

fold complex

• (a) Axial 2D image from CT colonography shows diffuse sigmoid fold thickening consistent with diverticular disease. One area appears more prominent and somewhat polypoid (arrowhead).

• (b) Endoluminal 3D view shows that the focal prominence in a is due to a convergence of folds, which is a common finding. The linear, elongated nature of folds is readily apparent on this display. Note also the diverticula.

ileocecal valve

• CT colonographic appearances of the ileocecal valve.

• (a) Endoluminal 3D view shows the "papillary" form of the ileocecal valve.

• (b) Endoluminal 3D view shows the "labial" form of the ileocecal valve.

Endoluminal foreign bodies

(medicine capsules).

• Endoluminal 3D view from CT colonography shows two well-circumscribed ovoid lesions that were symmetric in size and morphology. Images from 2D evaluation and 3D translucency rendering (not shown) demonstrated internal heterogeneity with areas of air attenuation internally. A third identical object was identified in the proximal colon. All three foreign bodies were readily mobile and assumed a dependent position on both supine and prone images. Immediately before CT colonography, the patient had undergone incomplete optical colonoscopy, which revealed several undigested shells of sustained-release capsules.

MRC is a promising modality

For help In detecting

Colorectal lesions > 10mm

MR Virtual Colonoscopy

(MRC)

Patients Preparation & Examination

• Standard bowel preparation.

• Rectal enema(H2O+ Gadolinium)

• Patient imaged by :

- 3D spoiled GE -2D single shot FSE

in both Why?

Increase examination accuracy.

Image Display

• 3D Endoluminal (colonoscopic) images.

• 2D Multiplanar reconstruction images. Why ?? For better evaluation of lesion

3D and 2D

Evaluation Of Colorectal Lesions With

MRC:

-Highly sensitive and specific in diagnosing polyps > 10mm

-Potential of visualizing extracolonic lesions.

MRVC Compared To

CT Colonoscopy (CTC)

Advantages

• No ionizing

radiation

• Direct imaging.

Disadvantages

• High cost ( MRI )

With (Contrast)

MRVC Compared To

Conventional Colonoscopy

Advantages

• No sedation

• No analgesia

• Least

intervention. • (+/-)Extra-luminal

lesion

Disadvantages

• High cost.

• Flat adenoma.

• Small polyp

• No therapy

Virtual Colonoscopy

Current Role

1)Preoperative evaluation of the entire colon:

• Extraluminal lesions.

• Synchronous lesions.

• Land marks to influence surgery.

In colorectal Carcinoma

2)Post operative evaluation of the colon.

3)Post irradiation evaluation of the colon.

Virtual Colonoscopy

Promise

To become a primary method for

colorectal cancer screening and

Return Radiologist to a Major Role In

Colon Cancer prevention