M.Sc. THESIS : EFFECTS OF LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY ON HUMAN BONE REGENERATION
100
1 | Page . Gonobishwabidyalay(GonoUniversity,Mirzanagar,Nayerhat,Savar,Dhaka-1344,Bangladesh.April 2010. 1 Dept.of Medical Radiation Physics,Kreiskrankenhaus Gummersbach, Teaching Hospital of the University of Cologne, 51643 Gummersbach, Germany. 2 Dept. of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Gono-Bishwabidyalay (Gono University), Nayarhat, Savar, Dhaka- 1344, Bangladesh. 3 Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka- 1207, Bangladesh.
M.Sc. THESIS : EFFECTS OF LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY ON HUMAN BONE REGENERATION
1.
.Gonobishwabidyalay(GonoUniversity,Mirzanagar,Nayerhat,Savar,Dhaka-1344,Bangladesh.April
2010.1 Dept.of Medical Radiation Physics,Kreiskrankenhaus
Gummersbach, Teaching Hospital of the University ofCologne, 51643
Gummersbach, Germany.2Dept. of Medical Physics and Biomedical
Engineering, Gono-Bishwabidyalay (Gono University), Nayarhat,Savar,
Dhaka- 1344, Bangladesh.3Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology,
Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka-1207,
Bangladesh.1|Page
2. DeclarationI declare that I am the sole author of this
thesis and that the work presentedhere has not previously been
submitted as an exercise for a degree or otherqualification at any
university.It consists entirely of my own work, except where
references indicateotherwise.2|Page
3. DedicationTo my parents, Mr. Alauddin Sikder & Ms.
Munira Begum- for fostering andencouraging my interest in science
&Mother in-law, late Ms. Anowara Begum and my wife Ms. Habiba
IslamHappy for their tremendous and unbelievable mental support
during my post-graduate period. Sponsored by-This research project
is jointly sponsored by-Lab-Nucleon & Acme Laboratories Ltd.,
Dhaka, Bangladesh.3|Page
4. I wish to express my deepest gratitude and thanks to my
guide and thesis supervisor Professor Golam AbuZakaria, for his
kind directions, inspiring guidance, and invaluable discussion
throughout the course. Without hispatience and encouragement, this
work would never be fulfilled. I also express my heartfelt respect
to my co-guides Prof. F. H. Sirazee , ex. head of the department,
and Associate professor, Dr. P C Debenarh, Departmentof Orthopedic
& Traumatology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital.
Dhaka-1207, Prof. Nurul Islamdept. of Medical Physics and
Biomedical Engineering, and Md. Delwar Hossain,
registrar,GonoBishwabidyalay (Gono University) Nayarhat, Savar,
Dhaka for heartiest co -operation and advicethroughout the whole
research period.I would also like to express my profoundest
gratitude to my thesis advisory board / working team
members,Associate Prof. Dr Sheikh Abbasuddin Ahmed, assistant Prof
Dr. Kazi Shamimuzzaman, Dr. Zia Uddin,consultant,Dr. Subir Hossain
Shuvro, assistant registrar, Dr. Abdul Hannan of Orthopedic &
Tramatology Department,assistant Prof Dr. Quamrul Akter Sanju of
Surgry department, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital
andDr. Sayed Shaheedul Islam Assistant professor, NITOR,
Dhaka.Special thanks are due to Prof. Khadiza Begum, ex-director,
Prof. A. K.M Mujibur Raman, director, Dr. MirMahamuda Khanam,
assistant director of SsMCH, Prof. S. M. Idris Ali, ex. head of the
department and vice-principal,SSMC and Prof. Abdul kader Khan,
ex-principal and head of the department, surgery, SSMC/
SsMCH,associate professor, Dr. Mostaq Hossain Tuhin of Surgery
department, assistant. Prof. Asraf Uddin, head o f thedepartment
,Radiology & Imaging department of SsMCH, and to all my friends
and well-wishers, specially to Mr.Sinha Abu Khalid CEO, LabNucleon,
Md. Masud Rana, medical Physicist, National Cancer Institute &
Hospital,Md. Anwarul Islam, medical physicist, Squrae Hospital
& Mr. Kumaresh Chandra Pal, medical physicist of
GonoBiswabidyalay, Dhaka-1344, and Md Shakilur Rahman, senior
scientific officer of Bangladesh Atomic EnergyCommission for their
kind and nice co-operation throughout the course of this work.My
deepest admiration and sincerest love to and my laser machine
technician Mr. Mamun, laser operator Ms.Jannant & Ms. Chewty of
LabNucleon, and Md. Abdul Aziz, Mr. Polash, Mr. Abul- kasem, Ms.
Fatema, Ms Farida,Mr. Malek of Orthopedic and Traumatology
Department, and Kazi Murad Hossain of Shaheed SuhrawardyMedical
Hospital, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh for their continuous efforts to
successfully complete this project.Finally, I owe much and pay my
heartiest thanks, especially to those who rendered their hind
assistance during mystudy period. Words cannot be expressed my
feeling of love, I am deeply indebted to my wife Habiba Islam,
myloving sons- Sayem Islam labib & Talaat Islam Syiam for all
their support and understanding. In the whole courseof this work,
they gave me a sweet working atmosphere, which I cant find words to
express. 4|Page
5. BY-DR. MD NAZRUL ISLAMLaser (Semiconductor diode, Ga-Al-As,
830nm) is effective in human bone regeneration,i.e. it enhances
bone fracture healing.Tissue healing is a complex process that
involves both local and systemic responses, and the healing process
of bone ismuch slower than that of soft tissues which is a great
challenge of medical science. The use of Laser Therapy (LLLT)
forwound healing has been shown to be effective in modulating both
local and systemic response by enhancing- cellular
&mitochondrial ion exchange, bone mineralization, nitric oxide
formation, lymphatic circulation, osteoblast proliferation,
effectson osteoblast gene expression, osteoclast inhibition
(prevents bone mineral resorption) and by bone engraftment
onsynthetic materials.40 (Twenty in laser & Twenty in control
group) otherwise healthy men and women with, closed appendicular
bone fracture(Radius/ ulna, or Femur / Tibial shaft /Clavicle /
Meta carpal /Meta-tarsal) was enrolled for fracture management by
lasertherapy adjunctive to regular management, and was assed by
clinical and radiological findings (X-ray)/at 2nd , 3rd, 4th and6th
week post fracture: assessment included fracture line/margins,
fracture gap, external callus appearance, callus-to-cortexratio,
bridging, and radiologic union as well as clinical assessment of
the fracture- compliance of patient, and onwardsfollow-up of
patients, in comparison to controlled group.Early significant bone
regeneration /callus formation achieved by early application of Low
Level laser therapy (Ga-Al-As, 830nm) on human fractured long
(appendicular) bone.Treatment with 830 nm diode laser has
substantially reduced the fracture healing time as well as improved
thequality/quantity of callus formation of the patient, thus
enhancing fracture healing. Laser biostimulative effects on bone
couldbe a new dimension for bone regeneration which significantly
reduce healing period, lessen cost of treatment, and enhancepatient
compliance in medical science.5|Page
6. 1.1 Introduction1.2 Background1.3 Literature review2.1
Cell2.2 Bone2.3 Bone Fracture2.4 Healing of fracture3.1 Laser3.2
Laser principle3.3 Components of a laser system3.4 Laser Machine3.5
Measurement of Laser Energy4.1 Biophysical Aspects & light
transport theory4.2 Laser - Tissue Interaction4.3 The Mechanisms of
Low Level Laser Therapy4.4: Effects of Laser on Biological
Cell/Tissue healing Laser on hard tissue & Bone stimulation/
Regeneration4.5 Medical application of Low Level Laser5.1
Materials5.2 Methods10.1 Figure & Table list10.2 Laser Books
& Articles10.3 Datasheet.10.4 Publications &
Presentation:10.5 Biography & pictures 6|Page
7. Chapter-1 Page- 7- 121.1 Introduction1.2 Background1.3
Literature reviewOptimizing the results of fracture treatment
requires a holistic view of both patients and treatment. The nature
of the patientdetermines the priority targets for outcome, which
differ widely between the elderly and the young, and between the
victimsof high and low energy trauma. The efficacy of treatment
depends on the overall process of care and rehabilitation as wellas
the strategy adopted to achieve bone healing.The rational basis for
fracture treatment is the interaction between three elements, (I)
the cell biology of bone regeneration,(ii) the revascularization of
devitalized bone and soft tissue adjacent to the fracture; and
(iii) the mechanical environment ofthe fracture. The development of
systems for early fracture stabilization has been an advance.
However, narrow thinkingcentered only on the restoration of
mechanical integrity leads to poor strategy - the aim is to
optimize the environment forbone healing. Future advances may come
from the adjuvant use of molecular stimuli to bone
regeneration.Restoring function to a patient who has had a fracture
requires the physician/ surgeon to handle a heady mix of
mechanicaland biological issues. In real life, it also requires
considerable input of time into practice organization, given the
largenumbers of patients and the almost universal inadequacy of
resource, if each individual patient is to receive timely
andappropriate intervention.There is a perception, not least among
fracture surgeons themselves, that the mechanical issues have been
over-emphasized in the past. The bonesetters art consisted
basically of- providing- anatomical realignment and external
supportfor as long as nature then took to restore internal
structural competence by bone healing. This was slow and unkind to
softtissues, particularly neighboring joints, so the development of
materials, bio-mechanical understanding and surgicaltechnique
launched a swing towards invasive interventions aimed at immediate
restoration of internal structural integrity.The principles of AO
treatment, drummed into a generation of orthopedic trainees, were
anatomical open reduction, rigidinternal fixation and early
rehabilitation of soft tissues without- external splint. But the
scale of invasion required to achievethese aims brought a steady
trickle of serious problems - most notably infected non-unions,
sometimes in cases whichsurgeons knew they could safely have
treated by simpler methods.Furthermore, there was increasing
realization that the abolition of inter-fragmentary motion implied
a commitment to primarycortical union as the only route for healing
and a closure of the natural routes of callus formation. From
various directions,less invasive alternatives were developed:
functional bracing, external fixation (including the remarkable
Ilizarov circularfixator developed in the USSR, which evades the
bone only with fine wires) and closed intra-medullary nailing.Now
the science is taking another step, further in the direction from
mechanics to biology. If the mechanical environmentinfluences bone
regeneration and hence fracture healing, how, at a cellular- level,
does it do so? - What molecular signals-produce the response? If we
know the signals, can we deliver them in the form of recombinant
growth factors and hurry the-cellular response down the right path?
7|Page
8. The evolution has been first to use nature, then to ignore
her, then to remember her, and now to outdo her.Optimal
fracturetreatment requires the following: (I) a definition of what
optimal treatment means and a way of measuring the extent to
whichit is achieved; (ii) a review of what we know about- the
natural healing process that we want to harness or improve upon;and
(iii) analysis of how to apply the above to clinical
practice.During the last decade, it was discovered that low-power
laser irradiation has stimulatory effects on bone tissue, in
themicroscopic (cell proliferation [1-5] and gene expression [6])
and macroscopic [1, 2, 4, 12, 13-20] biological systems.In order to
understand the effects of laser therapy, its mechanism of action in
the cell needs to be established. Manyexplanations have been
proposed {7-11]. Studies have shown that porphyrins and
cytochromes, natural photoacceptorslocated in the cell, are the
main contributors to laser-tissue interaction [7-11]. Porphyrins
and cytochromes absorb the light intothe cell, resulting in the
production of singlet 1O2. The singlet oxygen then stimulates the
redox activity in the mitochondria,enhances chemiosmosis, DNA
production and calcium-ion influx into the cytoplasm, thereby
causing mitosis and cellproliferation.The purpose of this review is
to analyze the effects of low power laser irradiation on bone cells
and bone fracture repair,examine what has been done so far, and
propose areas warranting further exploration.8|Page
9. Bone and fracture healing is an important homeostatic
process that depends on specialized cell activation andbone
immobility during injury repair [1, 2]. Fracture reduction and
fixation are a prerequisite to healing but a varietyof additional
factors such as age, nutrition, and medical co-morbidities can
mediate the healing process [3,4]..Different methods have been
investigated in attempts to accelerate the bone-healing process.
Most studieshave concentrated on drugs, fixation methods or
surgical techniques; however, there is a potential role
foradjunctive modalities that affect the bone-healing process.Laser
is an acronym for Light Amplification by stimulated Emission of
Radiation [5].The first laser wasdemonstrated in 1960 and since
then it has been used for surgery, diagnostics, and therapeutic
medicalapplications [6]. The physiological effects of low level
lasers occur at the cellular level[7, 8], and can stimulate
orinhibit biochemical and physiological proliferation activities by
altering intercellular communication [9]. Early workon physical
agents as mediators of bone healing was performed by Yasuda,
Noguchi and Sata who studied theelectrical stimulation effects on
bone healing in the mid 1950s[1, 10]. In subsequent years, others
repeated thiswork in humans [1, 11] and a variety of physical
agents have been investigated as potential mediators of bonehealing
[12, 23, 14, 15, and 16]. With increasing availability of lasers in
the early 1970s, the potential to investigate its useas a modality
to affect the healing of different connective tissues became
possible[17, 18, and 19]. In 1971, a shortreport by Chekurov stated
that laser is an effective modality in bone healing
acceleration[19]. Subsequently, otherresearchers studied bone
healing after laser irradiation using histological, histochemical,
and radiographicmeasures[18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24]. These
studies have demonstrated mixed results where some observed
anacceleration of fracture healing [19, 21, 22, 23, 24], while
others reported delayed fracture healing after low-level
laserirradiation [20, 25]. 9|Page
10. As far as is known, the first attempt at treating bone
fracture with infrared light was reported by Shugaharov and
Voronkov.In 1974 they used low level laser radiation (infrared
wavelengths) on fracture sites observing intramedullary
osteosynthesis.1Gatev studied the effect of stimulating repair of
fractures with He-Ne laser. The majority of patients had fractures
of the distalradius treated with a plaster cast. On the 5th to 8th
day after injury a hole was cut out of the cast over the fracture
site andlaser radiation applied at 632 nm, 2 mW/ cm2. Evaluations
were made based on radiographic evidence and clinicalassessment.
Results showed statistically significant differences [p He +Ne*An
excited helium atom meets a ground-state neon atom and transfers
its energy while decaying.Figure 3.2.6 also showsthat the lower
levels of the laser transitions are far from the ground state,
which favours population inversion (no thermalpopulation).Figure
3.2.6: A Helium-Neon Laser System. 37 | P a g e
38. 3.3. Components of a laser system Laser-ComponentsFigure:
3.3.7: Diagram of Components of laser SystemAll lasers are composed
of four basic components: oThe lasing medium oThe optical cavity
oThe pumping system oThe delivery systemThere are three different
vital parts to a Ga-Al-As laser: 1. an energy source, 2. a laser
material that absorbs this energyemits it as light, and 3. a cavity
that makes the light resonate and channels it in to narrow beam.
Within the cavity very highcirculating photon densities stimulate
the emission of light from the energized laser material. This
design creates a powerfulbeam of billions of photons, unlike to
laser and differentiating them from lower intensity light sources
like LEDs.3.4 Laser MachineFigure: 3.4.8: schematic diagram of
interior of a laser machine. 38 | P a g e
39. There are five (5) basic components that make up the laser
system, the control panel, the motherboard, the DC powersupply, the
laser tube assembly, and the motion system. A. DC Power Supply. B.
Motherboard C. Control Panel D. Laser Tube Assembly E. Motion
SystemFigure: 3.4.9: schematic diagram of the control panel of a
laser machine39 | P a g e
40. 3.5 Measurement, Parameter & Protocol of Laser3.5.1
Calculating Laser and Treatment Parameters-Laser Therapy devices
are generally specified in terms of the average output power
(milliwatts) of the laser diode,and the wavelength (nanometers) of
light they emit. This is necessary information, but not enough with
which toaccurately define the parameters of the laser system. To do
this, one must also know the area of the laser beam(cm2) at the
treatment surface (usually the tip of the hand piece when in
contact with the skin).If the output power (mW) and beam area (cm
2) are known, it is a reasonably straight-forward exercise to
calculatethe remaining parameters which allow the precise dosage
measurement and delivery.The output power of a laser,measured in
milliwatts, refers to the number of photons emitted at the
particular wavelength of the laser diode.Power Density measures the
potential thermal effect of those photons at the treatment area. It
is a function of LaserOutput Power and Beam area, and is calculated
as:Laser Output Power (W) 1) Power Density (W/cm2) =Beam area
(cm2)Beam area can be calculated by either: 2) Beam Area (cm2) =
Diameter(cm)2 x 0.7854 or: Beam Area (cm2) =Pi x Radius(cm)2The
total photonic energy delivered into the tissue by a laser diode
operating at a particular output power over a certain period is
measured inJoules, and is calculated as follows: Laser Output Power
(Watts) x Time (Secs) 3) Energy (Joules) =It is important to know
the distribution of the total energy over the treatment area, in
order to accurately measuredosage. This distribution is measured as
Energy Density (Joules/cm 2). "For a given wavelength of light,
energydensity is the most important factor in determining- the
tissue reaction"(Baxter, 1994). Energy Density is a functionof
Power Density and Time in seconds, and is calculated as:Laser
Output Power (Watts) x Time (Secs) 4) Energy Density (Joule/cm2)
=Beam Area (cm2) OR: Energy Density (Joule/cm2) = Power Density
(W/cm2) x Time (Secs)To calculate the treatment time for a
particular dosage, you will need to know the Energy Density (J/cm
2) or Energy (J), as well as the OutputPower (mW), and Beam Area
(cm 2 ). First, calculate the Output Power Density (mW/cm 2) as per
Equation 1, then:Energy Density (Joules/cm2) 5) Treatment Time
(Seconds) =Output Power Density (W/cm2)Energy (Joules) or:
Treatment Time (Seconds) =Laser Output Power (Watts)Finally:Laser
Output Power (mW) Laser Output Power (Watts) =100040 | P a g e
41. OutputBeam TreatmentEnergyEnergy DensityPower Spot SizeTime
(Secs)(Joules)(Joules/cm 2 )(mW)(cm2 )5 0.18.00.040.4500.18.00.4
4.0125 0.28.01.0 5.0250 0.28.02.0 10.0500 0.28.04.0 20.0Table: 3.
5.10: Various Laser Parameters v Dosage/Time: Illustrates
thedifference in Joules and Joules/cm 2 dosages for differing
output parameters.The calculation of these parameters is explained
above.3.5.2 Laser Parameters for Effective Treatment"For a given
wavelength of light, energy density is the most important factor in
determining the tissue reaction"(Baxter, 1994). Research indicates
that Energy Densities in the range 0.5 to 4 Joules/cm 2 are most
effective intriggering a photobiological response in tissue (e.g.
Mester & Jaszagi-Nagy, 1973; Mester & Mester, 1989;
Mashikoet al, 1983; Haina, 1982), with 4 Joules/cm 2 having the
greatest effect on wound healing (Mester et al, 1973; Mesteret al,
1989).Australian research suggests that this therapeutic window of
biostimulation may be extended to include10/Joules/cm 2 (Laakso et
al, 1994), and has applications in other areas of practice, such as
Myofascial Trigger Pointtherapy and pain control and tissue
healing. Dosages above 10J/cm 2 is proved to be bioinhibitive, and
the resultingbioinhibition, may also have therapeutic applications,
such as in the treatment of keloid scarring and painmanagement.
Many practitioners have found straight Joules dosages - up to 20
J/cm 2 in some cases 94.7J/cm2, tobe effective in the treatment of
a number of common musculoskeletal disorders. This is possibly due
to thecombined action of the pain attenuating properties of laser
bioinhibition at high dosages, and the biostimulatoryeffect of the
lower-powered halo around the target treatment point. However, the
same effect may not be elicitedfrom a different laser unit, due to
differences in laser parameters (esp. Power Density) and configura
tion.It is the Output Power Density which determines the time
required delivering a particular Energy Density(Joules/cm 2)
dosage, and the Output Power which determines the corresponding
Energy (Joules) delivered duringthat time. Results obtained from
particular dosages and treatments are likely to vary between
individual practitionersand patients, therefore, practitioner
discretion is recommended in determining the applicable wavelength
and -dosage parameters for- each patient. It is important to note-
that the appropriate- configuration of a laser unit willdepend
primarily upon the types of conditions most commonly treated, and
so specific requirements will generallydiffer between
practitioners. 41 | P a g e
42. 3.5.3 Treatment Protocol, Frequency, and ResponseTo
maximize irradiance at the target tissue, the laser probe should be
held in contact with, and perpendicular to, thetissue surface. When
treating open wounds, the probe should be held slightly away from
the tissue surface, whilststill maintaining a 90 o angle. The probe
tip may be covered with plastic cling film, in order to reduce the
likelihood ofcross-contamination.In treating musculoskeletal
conditions, laser therapy should be carried out following
cryotherapy as thevasoconstriction caused by cooling the tissue
will increase the penetration depth of the laser irradiation.
Lasertherapy helps to relax muscles, and so manipulations should be
carried out following laser irradiation. Heattherapies and various
creams and lotions can be applied after laser therapy.Laser
treatments can be carried out by irradiating daily for the first
week, then gradually increasing the intervalbetween treatments over
successive weeks, according to the progression of the condition
being treated. The totaldosage should not exceed 100-200 J in any
single treatment session.Laser dosage is cumulative, and so
overtreatment causing a degradation of LLLT effectiveness can come
fromoverly-high dosages in one treatment session, or too many
treatment sessions in close succession. In dividualpractitioner
discretion is to be used to determine the appropriate maximum
session dosage, and the frequency oftreatment, for each particular
patient.Patients may report a number of sensations, such as
localized feelings ofwarmth, tingling, or an increase or decrease
in symptoms, within the period immediately following laser
therapy.Other sensations that may be experienced in response to
laser therapy are nausea or dizziness. It is good practiceto advice
patients of this possibility.Treatment reactions, if they occur,
are often reported after initial laser treatments, however, they
generally diminishafter the second or third treatment. If a severe
reaction is experienced during treatment, stop immediately.To
reiterate, optimal biostimulation is affected by the application of
smaller dosages-per-point to more points at thetreatment site.
Optimal bioinhibition is achieved through applying higher
dosages-per-point, but to less treatmentpoints.When treating acute
musculoskeletal injuries, the initial desired outcome of laser
therapy is the reduction of painand inflammation. It is very
effective when used in conjunction with cryo-therapy, rest and
elevation of the injury site.Ideally treatment will begin as soon
as possible after the injury occurs, with relatively high,
inhibitory dosages (8-12Joules per- point, up to 10 points) being
used to attenuate the pain and reduce the initial inflammatory
response. Atreatment frequency of 1-2 sessions per day may be used
for the first 2-4 days post-injury.As the time post-injury
progresses, dosages and treatment frequency may be reduced. In the
period 5 -10 days post-injury, dosages of 6-8 Joules per point may
be useful in promoting the rate of the inflammatory process and
inclearing its products from the injury site, thus allowing healing
to begin sooner.Moving into the healing phase, dosages are lowered
and treatment frequency is reduced further. Throughout thehealing
and rehabilitation phase of an injury, biostimulatory dosages (1-4
Joules per point) are used to promotetissue repair and- reduce
scarring and adhesions. Higher doses may be used as required to
alleviate any pain thatresults from over-working the injured body
part during rehabilitation.When treating chronic injuries or pain,
it is best to start with lower doses and then work up to the most
effective dosefor that particular patient, as a high initial dose
may cause an unpleasant exacerbation of symptomatic pain. 42 | P a
g e
43. Page- 43-70 4.1 Biophysical Aspects & light transport
theory4.2 Laser - Tissue Interaction4.3 The Mechanisms of Low Level
Laser Therapy4.4 Effects of Laser on Biological Cell/Tissue healing
Laser on hard tissue & Bone stimulation/ Regeneration4.5
Medical application of Low Level Laser4.1a- Biophysical Aspects of
Low Level Laser Therapy (By Courtesy of-Herbert Klima, Atomic
Institute of the AustrianUniversities, Vienna, Austria) Biophysical
aspects of low level laser therapy will be discussed from two
points of view: The electromagnetic point of view, and The
thermodynamical point of view. From electromagnetic point of
view,Living systems are mainly governed by the electromagnetic
interaction whose interacting particles are called photons.
Eachinteraction between molecules, macromolecules or living cells
is basically electromagnetic and governed by photons. Forthis
reason, we must expect that electromagnetic influences like laser
light of proper wavelength will have remarkable impacton the
regulation of living processes. An impressive example of this
regulating function of various wavelengths of light isfound in the
realm of botany, where photons of 660 nm are able to trigger the
growth of plants which leads among otherthings to the formation of
buds. On the other hand, irradiation of plants by 730 nm photons
may stop the growth and theflowering. Human phagocyting cells are
natively emitting light which can be detected by single photon
counting methods.Singlet oxygen molecules are the main sources of
this light emitted at 480, 570, 633, 760, 1060 and 1270 nm-
wavelengths.On the other hand, human cells (leukocytes,
lymphocytes, stem cells, fibroblasts, etc) can be stimulated by low
power laserlight of just these wavelengths. From thermodynamical
point of view,Living systems - in contrast to dead organisms - are
open systems which need metabolism in order to maintain their
highlyordered state of life. Such states can only exist far from
thermodynamical equilibrium thus dissipating heat in order
tomaintain their high order and complexity. Such nonequilibrium
systems are called dissipative structures proposed by theNobel
laureat I. Prigogine. One of the main feature of dissipative
structures is their ability to react very sensibly on
weakinfluences, e.g. they are able to amplify even very small
stimuli.Therefore, we must expect that even weak laser light of
proper wavelength and proper irradiation should be able to
influencethe dynamics of regulation in living systems. For example,
the transition from a cell at rest to a dividing one will occur
duringa phase transition already influenced by the tiniest
fluctuations. External stimuli can induce these phase transitions
whichwould otherwise not even take place. These phase transitions
induced by light can be impressively illustrated by variouschemical
and- physiological reactions as special kinds of dissipative
systems. One of the most important biochemicalreaction localized in
mitochondria is the oxidation of NADH in the respiratory chain of
aerobic cells. 43 | P a g e
44. A similar reaction has been found to be a dissipative
process showing oscillating and chaotic behavior capable to
absorband amplify photons of proper wavelength.A great variety of
experimental and clinical results in the field of low level laser
therapy supports these two biophysicalpoints of view concerning the
interaction between life and laser light. Our former, but also our
recent experimental results onthe effects of low level- laser light
on human cells are steps in this direction.By using cytometric,
photometric and radiochemical methods it is shown that the increase
or decrease of cells growthdepends on the applied wavelengths (480,
570, 633, 700, 760, 904, 1060, 1270 nm), on the irradiance (100 -
5000 J/m2),on the pulse sequence modulated to laser beams
(constant, periodic, chaotic pulses), on the type of cells-
(leukocytes,lymphocytes, fibroblasts, normal and cancer cells) and
on the density of the cells in tissue cultures.Our experimental
results support our hypothesis which states that triplet oxygen
molecules are able to absorb proper laserlight at wavelength at
wavelengths 480, 570, 633, 700, 760, 904, 1060, 1270 nm thus
producing singlet oxygen molecules.Singlet oxygen takes part in
many metabolic processes, e.g. catalytic oxidation of NADH which
has been shown to be adissipative system far from thermodynamical
equilibrium and sensitive even to small stimuli. Therefore, laser
light of properwavelength and irradiance in low level laser therapy
is assumed to be able- to excite oxygen molecules thus influencing
oramplifying metabolism and consequently influencing and supporting
fundamental healing processes. 44 | P a g e
45. 4.1b- Light transport theoryWhen light is sent into
biological tissue, different processes can occur. While most of the
light enters the tissue, a small partof it can be reflected off the
tissue surface. The amount of reflected light depends on the angle
of incidence and the index ofrefraction. Inside the tissue, the
light can be absorbed or scattered. Both processes are highly
wavelength dependent. In thelower part of the visible wavelength
region, the scattering probability is comparable to the absorption.
In the red and near-infrared wavelength region light penetrates
tissue better. This region is called the optical window. Based on
measurementsof optical properties, physiological or structural
information about the probed tissue can be extracted. Here will
outline themathematical basis of light transport in tissues and
describe the tissue features that affect this transport.The process
of light transport in turbid media may be described mathematically
either by analytical theory, based directly onMaxwells equations,
or by transport theory. Maxwells equations can describe the
interaction between light and tissue as anelectromagnetic wave
propagating through a medium with random dielectric fluctuations.
However, due to the complexstructure of tissue it is in principle
impossible to obtain a formulation that takes all its dielectric
properties into account (A.Ishimaru 1978). Transport theory, on the
other hand, treats the problem as a flow of power through a
scattering medium.Transport theory is less mathematically- rigorous
than electromagnetic theory and does not in itself include effects
such asdiffraction or interference. However, it has proven useful
for calculating photon transport in tissue. It is usually expressed
forthe radiance L(r,s,t) [Wm-2sr-1], which is the radiant power per
unit area and unit solid angle in direction s, at a position
inspace r. It is obtained by multiplying the light distribution
function, N(r,s,t) [m-3sr-1], with the speed and energy of
thephotons in the medium. Radiance is the quantity used to describe
the propagation of photon power. The transport equationcan be
formulated as Where c is the speed of light in the tissue, c =
c0/n/ is the speed of light in vacuum and n is the refractive index
of themedium. The scattering and absorption coefficients s and a
describe the probability of a scattering or absorption eventper
unit length. The phase function, p(s, s) denotes the probability
that a scattered photon initially travelling in direction
scontinues in direction s after the scattering event. The integral
of the probability density function over all- solid angles d
isequal to one. The transport equation describes the energy balance
in an infinitesimal volume element in the tissue.The left-hand side
of Equation (8) is the change in number of photons at position r,
with direction s at time t. On the right-hand side, the first two
terms describe the loss of- photons, due to escape over the volume
boundaries, scattering into otherdirections or- absorption. The
third term represents the gain through photons that are scattered
from- other directions intodirection s, while the last term is gain
due to a light source. It is assumed that all photons have the same
energy and that allscattering is elastic. 45 | P a g e
46. It is further assumed that the scattering is symmetric
about the incident wave, which means that the phase function is
afunction of the scattering angle alone, such that p(s,s)= p(),
where is the angle- between the incident and the scatteredphoton.
It is often useful to have an analytic expression for the phase
function.The most popular phase function for light transport in
biological tissue is the Henyey-Greenstein function(L.G
Henyey,J.LGreenstein 1941)Where g, the anisotropy factor, is the
mean cosine of the scattering angle . For nearly isotropic
scattering, the value of g isclose to zero, while a g close to
unity indicates a strongly forward directed scattering. Tissue is
in general highly forwardscattering. Analytic solutions to the
transport equation are only known for a few special cases (K.M Case
andP.F Zwiefel1978). In practise, either numerical methods such as
Monte Carlo simulations or expansion in spherical harmonics.
TheMonte Carlo method simulates a migration of photon packages in a
scattering and absorbing medium. The simulatedinteraction events of
these photon packages are based on random samplings from
probability distributions of the step sizebetween interaction
events and scattering angles. For each scattering event, the light
is also attenuated due to absorption.The trajectory of the photon
package is followed until it exits through a boundary or is totally
lost by absorption. The MonteCarlo method is useful in that it can
be used for any geometry, including layered and inhomogeneous
media, and for anyoptical properties. The main disadvantage is
that, due to the statistical nature of the method, a large number
of photonpackages have to be simulated, and requiring long
computation times.46 | P a g e
47. 4.2 Laser - Tissue InteractionFigure-4.2.1-Schematic
diagram of laser-tissue interaction Laser follows Lambert Beer law
when it inter-acts with biological tissues. Lambert Beer law I = Io
10-aX = absorption coefficient X = thickness of material/tissue Io
= incident intensity I = transmitted intensity Extinction length =
1/ = L; where 90% of the intensity is absorbed, when light energy
is reflected, transmitted, absorbed and scattered by interacting
with biological tissues. Laser light can have the following effects
with biological tissue: 1) Photochemical /Photodynamic effects 2)
Photothermal effects 3) Mechanical effects 4) Photoablative effect.
PhotochemicalLaser energy can interact directly or indirectly with
chemical structures within tissue. Photobiomodulation
(laserbiostimulation, "cold laser" therapy): Low level laser or
narrowband light has been used with varying success to
modulatecellular activity to achieve a biological effect such as
stimulation of hair growth, collagen remodeling, accelerated
woundhealing, etc. In most cases the mechanism of action remains
unclear, although changes in mitochondrial activity or cellmembrane
permeability may be responsible.47 | P a g e