29
PRELASIK EVALUATION BY Dr. Amr Mounir Lecturer of ophthalmology Sohag university

Prelasik evaluation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Prelasik evaluation

PRELASIK EVALUATIONBY Dr. Amr Mounir Lecturer of ophthalmologySohag university

Page 2: Prelasik evaluation

Includes

1. Accurate refraction evaluation.

Page 3: Prelasik evaluation

2- Corneal topography

2- Corneal topography Aim : to avoid ectasia

Page 4: Prelasik evaluation

Aim of corneal topography

To avoid post lasik ectasia by exclusion of suspicious cornea

Page 5: Prelasik evaluation

Refraction: Like glasses with following tips:

In Myopia : Correct the full correction especially in young

candidates

In Hypermetropia:Over correct due to high liability of regression in HMT

Page 6: Prelasik evaluation

Importance of cycloplegic refraction

In Myopia : -Cycloplegic < manifest -Avoid difference > 1DsIn Hypermetropia : - Cycloplegic > manifest - May be marked difference

- Be near cycloplegic in tttt

Page 7: Prelasik evaluation

What Pentacam says to us??? Pachymetry mapKeratometry map ( K1,K2,Kmax) Elevation mapProvisional diagnosis: Keratoconus Summary (Sirus device)

Aberration mapScheimpflug imaging

Page 8: Prelasik evaluation

Examples

Page 9: Prelasik evaluation

4 Maps

Page 10: Prelasik evaluation

Aspherotoric map

Page 11: Prelasik evaluation

Keratoconus summary map

Page 12: Prelasik evaluation

4 Maps: Inferior steepening

Page 13: Prelasik evaluation

Aspherotoric map: High back elevation

Page 14: Prelasik evaluation

Keratoconus summary map

Page 15: Prelasik evaluation

4 Map : Horizontal bow tie

Page 16: Prelasik evaluation

Summary map

Page 17: Prelasik evaluation

Pellucid Marginal Degeneration (PMD) and Pellucid-like Keratoconus- PMD is a bilateral, non-inflammatory, peripheral corneal

thinning disorder characterized by a peripheral band of thinning of the inferior cornea. The cornea in and adjacent to the thinned area is ectatic.

- Patients usually are aged 20–40 years at the time of clinical presentation.

Page 18: Prelasik evaluation
Page 19: Prelasik evaluation

Options For Treatment

Page 20: Prelasik evaluation

LASIK OR PRK ????

Page 21: Prelasik evaluation

LASIK OR PRK ????

LASIK- Normal Pentacam- Sufficient thickness- Normal retina

- Clear cornea

- More dry eye - Rapid rehabilitation

PRK- Suspicious Pentacam -Thin cornea- Peripheral retinal

degenerations - - Faint superficial

opacities- Less dry eye - Slow rehabilitation

Page 22: Prelasik evaluation

Corneal thickness and correction

Page 23: Prelasik evaluation

Corneal thickness and correction

- Every 1Ds correction will remove about of 10 um of the corneal stroma

- The residual bed shouldn't be less than 300 um to avoid post Lasik ectasia.

- The residual bed = Thinnest location - [ablation depth ( ttt) + flap thickness]

Page 24: Prelasik evaluation

Keratometry and correction

Page 25: Prelasik evaluation

Keratometry and correction

For Myopic Correction :

- Every 1 Ds correction will decrease Keratometry by 0.8 Ds.

- Avoid to decrease the flattest K below 34 Ds to avoid aberrations

Page 26: Prelasik evaluation

Keratometry and correction

For Hypermetropic Correction :

- Every 1 Ds correction will increase Keratometry by 1.00 Ds.

- Avoid to increase the steepest K above 50 Ds to avoid aberrations

Page 27: Prelasik evaluation

Age as a guideline for decision

Page 28: Prelasik evaluation

Age as a guideline for decision

In Young age < 30 ysFull or over correction is recommended to compensate for future regression

In old age > 30 ys Full correction is recommended or even slight under correction is needed especially in presbyopic patients.

Page 29: Prelasik evaluation

Thank you