59
KIEW 07.04.2015 Frank Spahn, Cannes France Risks in early loading in all implant types and the consequent rules of Branemark

Risks in early loading in all implant types

  • Upload
    isoss

  • View
    88

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

KIEW

07.04.2015

Frank Spahn, Cannes France

RisksinearlyloadinginallimplanttypesandtheconsequentrulesofBranemark

Page 2: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 3: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

UnilateralSituations are dangerousinearly loading

-here loading afterhealing inbone graftafter4monthsRemarks:Interferences and hyperferences inlateraldeviationNo correction of curve of SpeePossibly tosmall graftnotofferingenough lateralstability and resistance

Page 4: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Situationafterimpactation:Friction gives primary stabilityOsteoclastswillwork against stability

Lateralvectors canirritate bone and initiate resorption

Local overcharge of bone caninitiate resorptionInflammationwilllead toresorption

Page 5: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Initial Branemark-rules before 1980

Completely healed extraction socket, 12 months,better more

At least 13mm bone above or below an obstacle,better more

At least 1mm bone on the lingual and vestibular sidebetter more

At least bone class III, better II

All loading before 12 months is seen as early loading

Page 6: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Advantages of Impactation of PEEK:

• No damages by pressure

• No damages by heating when screwing

• Open insertion channel permits exsudation andsuppuration for regeneration and healing of bone

Page 7: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Workinginbad bone qualitylow bone volumewith long cantilever

innotyet mineralized ,notyethealed insertions channels,with notyet reestablished irrigation

requires as less lateralvectors,lessscissor-forces as possible

Alternative:bone graftor otherinvasivemethods

Page 8: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Branemark rules up from 1984

Implant after 3 months healing time for socketBone height 10-mm, be aware of riskBone largeness <1mm, be aware of riskBone class III, be aware of risk

Load after 3-6 months in the lower, be aware of riskLoad after 4-8 months in the upper, be aware of risk

Different risks added in the same case, will lead to failure

Page 9: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Bigrisk for immediateloading:Implantinsertion obviously suboptimal,especially inthe upper.Recommendation :use 18and 28andatointegrate „temporary“implant inregion 21or 12as base forfixed bridge and let the „main“implants heal-infor more than 6monthsPerfect equilibration needed inany case

Page 10: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

There are more risks:

Operation phase good planning

Healing phase information

Patients compliance recall system

Technician work radiography

Doctors precision fixed procedures

General risks developping by the time communication

Patients compliance in the longterm recall

Page 11: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Evenif well equilibrated occlusion,pay attention tothe technicianwork:Less risk with metal or PEEK-infrastructure even for provisional temporary bridgesBetter work with temporary implants toprotect the „definite“implants

Page 12: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Immediateloading with impacted implantsinfull mouth rehabilitations atrophic teethless jawsonly onpatients with good compliance and assuredcontrol possibilitiesOcclusion willchange considerably inthe first 6weeks and after

Page 13: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Consentment ofcustomersusingPEEK-PERSO-TechniqueThecustomersconsentinusingthetechniqueinthefirst18months

- intwo-stepprocedure,awareofthenecessityofloadablebone-reconstruction- inearly-loadingtoinstallbilaterallyequilibratedbalancedocclusiononlyinpatientswithapprouvedcompliance.

- Thecustomersareequippedwithmachineryandinstrumentspermittingonitsbesttofollowtheproposedprotocolls- Thecustomersmakesignthepatientaconsentment forthe

implantationwhereisfixedthatthecontractualfollow-upwillberespectedfor18monthswithcontrol-conebeamsafter6weeks,6months,12monthsand18months;thatthepatienthastostayinthetreatmentoftheprofessionalfor18monthsifeveraquestionshouldcomeup.

Page 14: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Internatio InternationalSocietyforPromotionofKnowledgeaboutIsoelasticMaterialsinIntraOSSeous Surgery

PEEK-PERSO-Technique delivers reproductible results and isapprouved for the treatment of caseswhere Titanium implants have failed

and where more invasiveadjuvant therapiesadd risk to the pureimplant risk.

Thetechnique should be employed following theSurgical and prosthetical protocolls fixed

by IsoSS.

Page 15: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

https://www.en.sisomm.com/procedures/

Theprocedures PEEKPERSO

Page 16: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Post-Operation Phase:Day 1 to day 365 depending from your planningprepare the loading phase

-install bilateral equilibrated balanced occlusion-regularly adapt occlusion pattern

Start loading phase:conserve the datas and transfer to technicianinclude the definite abutments in impressiontry-in and check hyperferences in lateral deviation

Page 17: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

MODELL-ANALYSIS

PositionDirectionSizeLength

of abutmentsto make work antagonists in one axe

Page 18: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Choice of abutments

monobloc-primary abutmentshape the abutment using diamantswith alternating water supply

divided-secondary abutmentchoice following your prosthetical planning-ciment-fixed construction-screw-fixed construction

5c

Page 19: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

https://www.en.sisomm.com/procedures/

Theprocedures PEEKPERSO

Page 20: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

INSTALLthe ABUTMENTSCrestal divided techniqueand basaltechnique aftersubmucosal healing

Openthe implant site conserving softtissue inaesthetical regions-takeaway the healing screw-(first with little flame central cut,then OFR5,turning left,20rpm)

or Install acentral whole with thread onthe implant platform helped byOZIEL,OFR7,OFR8and OT25

Crestal Monobloc and Basaltransgingival healingShapethe choosen abutment tothe required

size,length,direction

Page 21: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

PEEK-abutments have two ends

Cut the not needed 2nd end of the installed abutment; conserve it,

eventually resterilize it for use in another context!

Page 22: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

OABU1UNIVERSAL

PEEK-Abutments for PERSO-B- and PERSO-C-technics

OABU2Standard

OAXE SPECIAL

First function part

Second function part

Mayserveas-cicatrization screw-prolounger threadto combinewithOAXE2ndpart

Mayserveas-gingiva-former-combinewith threadfor aOABU2

Overbridge distancesbetween implantandprostheticalconstruction 12-28mmParallelization 1-6°

Forstandarddistance5-12mmbetweenimplantandprostheticalconstructionParallelization 1-6°

Forparallelization ofmorethan 6° -20°Forscrew-fixation ofprosthetics

Page 23: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

La partie de l'image avec l'ID

On Operation day: No use of Silicones for impressions

CHOICE the ABUTMENT

Page 24: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 25: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 26: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 27: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 28: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

KEEPall parametersfrom former prosthetical constructionsfor easier to optimize inthephase oftemporary bridge

Page 29: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 30: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 31: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Materiel for bridges•8mmheight of bone,bone class II(Misch)

•Allmaterials,- CR-CO,Circonium,Ti• - PEEK• - Ceramic feldspatic (if little bridges)

• Less than 8mmor bone class III/IV• Lightest materialPEEK

Page 32: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Design of limits of crowns and bridge-elements

Non-esthetical region: 1mm distance to gingivaEsthetical region: use switching platform

Page 33: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 34: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Switching platform installed virtuallyor with OAXE in real

Page 35: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 36: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 37: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

PEEK is the ONLY INERT material

Page 38: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Use artificial gingiva only in esthetical zones

Page 39: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 40: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 41: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 42: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

No obstacles in lateral deviation before day 365

Page 43: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

BilderLabille mitKeramik

BildervonScanpost-op

Page 44: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 45: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Bilateral Equilibrated Balanced Occlusionwithout Obstaclesinlateral Deviation

Page 46: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Perfect bone healing afterzystectomies andextractionswith simoultanous incorporationof implants.

Loading of implants after4to 6months

Page 47: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Latemineralisation inthecenter of former zystregionsMineralization after12months is stronger aroundthe implants than informer zysts

Page 48: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

•CONDITIONS sine qua non forearly loading in atrophic situations:

• Enough cortical bone surrounding the implants for lateral stability(1mm at least)

• Bone class II quality• Exact surgical cut with exactly cutting tools

• Frameworkfor temporary bridges inhibiting torsions and flexions orreducing toaminimum

• Bilateralequilibrated and balanced occlusion,controlled in(inthebeginning)short intervalls,cooperative patient

• Cleanneckconditions ,no ciment rests irritating the marginalgingiva

Page 49: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 50: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

BilderLabille mitKeramik

BildervonScanpost-op

Page 51: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Aerea of implant interface

Incisal border lower jaw

Step of 2-3,5 cm

Page 52: Risks in early loading in  all implant types
Page 53: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

PATN° 5

Page 54: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

PATN° 5

Page 55: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

Attention to sinus-reaction post-extractionPATN° 5

Page 56: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

SubtileOcclusalEquilibrationrequired inatrophiesifimmediately loaded

Page 57: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

4 yearspost-op

PATN° 5

Page 58: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

5yearsPost-op

PATN° 5

Page 59: Risks in early loading in  all implant types

THANK YOUFOR YOUR ATTENTION