15
Prediction of vertebral fracture by Trabecular Bone Score in elderly women of The Rotterdam Study Atanasovska Biljana Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, The Netherlands Osteoporosedag der Hoge Landen November 30 th 2013 Drs. B. Atanaso

Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Prediction of vertebral fracture by Trabecular Bone Score in elderly women of The Rotterdam Study

Atanasovska Biljana Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC

Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Osteoporosedag der Hoge Landen

November 30th 2013

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 2: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Authors Biljana Atanasovska, MSc1,2, Ling Oei, MD, MSc, MA1,2,3, Carolina Medina-Gomez, MSc1,2,3, Natalia Campos Obando, MD, MSc1,2,3, Karol Estrada, PhD1,2,3,4, Albert Hofman, MD, PhD2,3, Berengere Aubry-rozier, MD5, M. Carola Zillikens, MD, PhD1,3, André G. Uitterlinden, PhD1,2,3, Edwin H.G. Oei, MD, PhD6, Didier Hans, MBA, PhD5, Fernando Rivadeneira, MD, PhD1,2,3,.

1Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 2Department of Epidemiology Erasmus MC Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 3Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)-sponsored Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging (NCHA), the Netherlands. 4Analytical & Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA. 5Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. 6Department of Radiology Erasmus MC Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Disclosures: Didier Hans has a co-ownership of the TBS patent

The other co-authors have nothing to declare

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 3: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used to diagnose osteoporosis, providing accurate estimates of bone mass through the evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD)

BMD is not always an accurate predictor of fracture; it is an assessment of the quantity of bone but does not provide information on bone quality

Further, > 50% of fractures occur above the “osteoprosis” BMD threshold

Evaluating other bone parameters, such as bone microarchitecture, could significantly enhance the assessment of bone strength and fracture risk

BMD measured by DXA is an imperfect predictor of fracture risk, therefore, additional assessments are desirable

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 4: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

§  The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a measure of bone texture; correlates with 3D parameters of bone microarchitecture and a marker

for the risk of oteoporosis

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 5: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

§  TBS strongly correlated with the number and connectivity of trabeculae, while it is negatively correlated with the space between trabeculae

TBS ≤1.2 defines degraded microarchitecture TBS 1.20 - 1.35 is partially degraded microarchitecture TBS ≥1.35 is considered normal

After calibration

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 6: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

§  Trabecular bone score measurement

Hans at al., Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2011

- Identifying a method that differentiates these 2 types of structures will obtain a way to describe a 3-dimensional (3D) structures

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 7: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Aim of this study

§  - examine the relation of trabecular bone score (TBS) with vertebral fracture in a population-based setting for:

§  1) prevalent vertebral fractures assessed on radiographs (X-rays)

§  2) incident clinical vertebral fractures (general practioner+hospital)

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 8: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

§  Rotterdam Study cohorts (RS-I, RS-II and RS-III) §  N = 2760 women with DXA scans

§  DXA scans (GE-Lunar Prodigy; Madison, WI), LS-BMD and TBS measurement (TBS iNsight software – not calibrated) available in:

§  RS-I during the third follow-up

§  RS-II during the first follow-up

§  RS-III during the baseline visit

§  Women with BMI>35g/cm2 excluded

Study population

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 9: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Study population

Clinical fracture follow-up

TBS X-ray

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 10: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

§  Incident clinical vertebral fractures occurring during follow-up: §  RS-I and RS-II (combined n=1484, 21 cases)

§  HR from Cox-regression*

§  Radiographic vertebral fractures were available for :

§  RS-I-3 (McCloskey-Kanis; n=845, 53 cases)

§  RS-III-1 (Optasia quantitative morphometry; n=1272, 221 cases)

§  OR from Logistic- regression*

§  * Models corrected for age, height and weight

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 11: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Results

- Both TBS and BMD mean levels are significantly lower in fracture cases than non-cases (P<0.05) - Correlation between TBS and LS-BMD was low (Pearson rho 0.25-0.30) across studies (P<0.001)

Population characteristics

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 12: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

§  Radiographic prevalent vertebral fractures were associated with increased risk per SD decrease in TBS score:

§  RS-I OR 1.71 95%CI [1.29-2.27]; P=0.0002

§  RS-III OR 1.27 95%CI [1.08-1.48]; P=0.004

§  Combined analysis of incident clinical vertebral fractures was suggestive of increased risk per SD decrease in TBS score:

§  RS-I+RS-II HR 1.48 95%CI [0.96-2.29]; P=0.08

§  Additional adjustment for lumbar spine BMD did NOT affect the risk estimates nor the interaction TBS x BMD

§  Lower TBS scores were associated with increased risk for prevalent and incident clinical vertebral fractures

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 13: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

TBS and LS-BMD together predict slightly better than LS-BMD alone

Prevalent vertebral fractures

Incident vertebral fractures

    AUC   CI  

LS-­‐BMD   0.685   0.655-­‐0.716  

TBS   0.686   0.655-­‐0.717  

LS-­‐BMD+TBS   0.701   0.670-­‐0.732  

    AUC   CI  

LS-­‐BMD   0.664   0.560-­‐0.767  

TBS   0.692   0.584-­‐0.800  

LS-­‐BMD+TBS   0.693   0.585-­‐0.801  

__ Reference __ Age, wgt, hgt __ + BMD __ + TBS __ + BMD & TBS

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 14: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Conclusions

§  Trabecular bone score (TBS) is strongly & significantly associated with 1.3 to 1.7 increased risk for prevalent vertebral fractures per SD decrease

§  Each SD decrease in TBS is also associated (borderline significant) with 1.5 increased risk for clinical incident vertebral fractures

§  TBS associations with vertebral fractures are independent of DXA-based lumbar spine BMD and their combination slightly improves risk prediction

§  Subsequent studies with larger sample sizes are currently underway

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska

Page 15: Seminar 30-11-2013 - Prediction of vertebral fracture

Acknowledgments

Anis Abuseiris Jolande Verkroost Frank van Rooij

Marijn Verkerk Nano Suwarno Edward Peters Joost Verburg Jan Heeringa René Vermeeren

Mart Rentmeester Hans Bowier Hannie van den Boogert

Mette Offerhaus Florian Buisman Bart Hazemeijer Lisanne van de Koevering

Nuray Çakici Nienke Bart Rodinde Bloot Hanna Ning

Maarten Meijer Khadija Moumni Sander Verkade Sebastian Valk Bonila

Nadia Rbia Maria Tihaya Burak Kalin

Eugene McCloskey, Sheffield University, UK TBS inSIGHT: Research and Development section, Nuclear Medicine Division,

University of Geneva. Optasia: SpineAnalyzer® software § 

Mw. Drs. B

. Atanasovska