27
Developing Networks of Care: through Long Term Conditions Year of Care Commissioning & Long Term Conditions Improvement Programmes Bev Matthews Programme Lead for Long Term Conditi 29 th October 2014

Tackling long term conditions

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Developing Networks of Care through Long Term Conditions Year of Care Commissioning & Long Term Conditions Improvement Programmes Bev Matthews Programme Lead for Long Term Conditions @Bev_J_Matthews Presentation from the Tackling Long Term Conditions conference on 29 October 2014

Citation preview

Page 1: Tackling long term conditions

Developing Networks of Care:

throughLong Term Conditions Year of Care Commissioning

&

Long Term Conditions Improvement Programmes

Bev MatthewsProgramme Lead for Long Term Conditions29th October 2014

Page 2: Tackling long term conditions

2008 – Polysystems & Person Centred Care

2009 – Risk Stratification

2010 – Integrated data

2011 – LTC management, & The Year of Care

2012 – Integrated Case Management

2013 – Rapid Response & Community Treatment Teams

2014 – Complex Primary Care Practice

2015 – 5 Year Forward View

Drivers for Improvement:

Page 3: Tackling long term conditions

5%

20%

75%

The scale of the problem and the cost:

45%

40%

15%

Multiple complex conditions

Single LTC/ at risk

Healthy / minor risk

Population segments Cost

Page 4: Tackling long term conditions

Commissioning in silos:

• All PbR (except YoC or

package currencies)

Acute Community Mental Health Social Care Voluntary/ Independent

Primary care

Primary care prescribing

NHS England as commissioner

• Non-PbR block contract

• PbR excl drugs• Crit. Care

Personal healthcare

budget

Specialised MH Services

Means-tested

services (incl. residential)

Within currency

Rehabilitation palliative & end of life

Maternity pathway

• Reablement• Adult Services

PbR MH clusters

Children’s services

GP services

Include if possible

Residential continuing care

(Include if possible)

Include if possible

Page 5: Tackling long term conditions

• Risk stratification tool applied• LTC codes applied (18 in total - QoF)• List segmented by LTC currency (Bands B – E applied - B=2,C=3-5,D=6-

8,E=9), • Risk Score over time mapped (looking for rise in risk score in

last 6 mths – 4 of 6 show an increase) or • Rapid Riser in last 3 mths (mthly increase in risk score over

past 3 mths and overall increase of >15pts).• Kent – 80 GP practices, Band B = 2197, Band C= 3506, Band D

=261, Band E= 5 Total 6369 of 729, 275• Now driving increased engagement in risk stratification

Identifying patients:

Page 6: Tackling long term conditions

LTC Year of Care CommissioningImplementation Guide

Page 7: Tackling long term conditions

Over 30% of people over 75 years have multimorbidity

Population Level Commissioning for the Future:

Page 8: Tackling long term conditions

Population Level Commissioning for the Future:

Page 9: Tackling long term conditions

The total health and social care cost is strongly related to multimorbidity

Population Level Commissioning for the Future:

Page 10: Tackling long term conditions

The main contributors to total health & social care cost are acute non-elective admissions

Population Level Commissioning for the Future:

Page 11: Tackling long term conditions

People with complex health & social care needs appear to demonstrate a ‘crisis curve’

Population Level Commissioning for the Future:

Page 12: Tackling long term conditions

More community, mental health and social care services are delivered to people following a ‘crisis’ than before the ‘crisis’

Population Level Commissioning for the Future:

Page 13: Tackling long term conditions

Some indications that an integrated care plan changes the pattern of services delivered to people

Page 14: Tackling long term conditions

LTC Year of Care Commissioning ModelImplementation Guide

Page 15: Tackling long term conditions
Page 16: Tackling long term conditions

SIMUL8 Corporation | SIMUL8.com | [email protected]

• A service and system redesign• Understanding the impact of changing service

utilization on:– Flow– Cost– Capacity/Resource

• No historic data• Different impacts on organizations, costs and

patients

Why simulation?

Page 17: Tackling long term conditions

SIMUL8 Corporation | SIMUL8.com | [email protected]

• Use local data to test assumptions

• Ability to update and review

LTC Year of Care Simulation Model

Page 18: Tackling long term conditions

SIMUL8 Corporation | SIMUL8.com | [email protected]

How it works:

• Patients in each “state” have– A likelihood of accessing certain types of service, including

accessing services more than once• Acute, • Community, • Mental Health, • Social Care),

• Costs associated with those services

Page 19: Tackling long term conditions

SIMUL8 Corporation | SIMUL8.com | [email protected]

Results:

• Cost by each area of service/organisation

Page 20: Tackling long term conditions

SIMUL8 Corporation | SIMUL8.com | [email protected]

• Costs by state per year• Average cost per patient

• Comparison with tariff

Results:

Page 21: Tackling long term conditions

LTC Year of Care Commissioning ModelImplementation Guide

Next Chapter:RRR Clinical Audit:

• Report• Simulation Model, • How to Guide

Page 22: Tackling long term conditions

Long Term Conditions House of Care:

• The 15 million people in England with long term conditions have the greatest needs of the population

• People living with long term conditions report that they require person centred coordinated care.

• The House of Care provides framework for this to be delivered

Page 23: Tackling long term conditions

The House of Care: value to the personThis House supports National Voices ‘I’ statements:

My goals/outcomes e.g.• All my needs as a person were

assessed and taken into account.

Communication e.g.• I always knew who was the

main person in charge of my care.

Information e.g.• I could see my health and

care records at any time to check what was going on

Decision-making e.g.• I was as involved in

discussions and decisions about my care and treatment as I wanted to be. Care planning e.g.

• I had regular reviews of my care and treatment, and of my care plan.

Transitions e.g.• When I went to a new

service, they knew who I was, and about my own views, preferences and circumstances.

Emergencies e.g.• I had systems in place so that

I could get help at an early stage to avoid a crisis.

Page 24: Tackling long term conditions

The House of Carein value to NHS: £1.2bn:

Avoid ambulatory care sensitive admissions though e.g. following NICE guidelines (1)

£0.8bn:Reduction of hospital admissions for common LTCs through integrated care esp frailty, comorbid (2)

£0.8-1.2bn:Reduce use of low value drugs, devices and elective procedures using commissioning analytics and clinician education (3)

£0.2-0.4bn:Empower people in supportive self-management (4)

£1-1.6bn:Shift activity to cost effective settings e.g. pharmacy minor ailments (5)

£0.4-0.6bn:Avoidance of drug errors e.g. through electronic records/e-prescribing (7)

Page 25: Tackling long term conditions
Page 26: Tackling long term conditions
Page 27: Tackling long term conditions

@NHSIQ@bev_j_matthews ICASE LTC Community

LTC Year of Care Community