1
Low profitability of the industry, Arabtec is well positioned. The PMT decide to diversify the business with different products (oil and gas, power, infrastructure, affordable housing) and different geographical areas (India, North Africa) Alessandro Rinaldi Porter’s Five Forces of Competitive Position Arabtec Construction L.L.C. Competitive Rivalry: Strong Excess capacity-- fall in demand Competitive tender to win a contract Lowest fees to win the contract Similar construction products Overcrowded market Bargaining Power of Supplier: Weak Backward integration into the business of suppliers Construction materials available from many suppliers Switching costs are low Threat of Substitute Products or Services: Strong New methods and processes New methods cost less than traditional ones Low switching costs: new project= new consultants Bargaining Power of Buyers: Strong Clients adopt a information technology system for decision making Clients can postpone projects Threat of New Entrants: Weak No loyalty, the lowest bid wins Low switching costs: new project = new consultants and suppliers High Capital requirement High risk of fail the target (time, cost, scope) Difficulties to have skilled workers

Arabtec - Porter’s Five Forces

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Arabtec - Porter’s Five Forces

Low profitability of the industry, Arabtec is well positioned. The PMT decide to diversify the business with different products (oil and gas,

power, infrastructure, affordable housing) and different geographical areas (India, North Africa)

Alessandro Rinaldi

Porter’s Five Forces of Competitive Position Arabtec Construction L.L.C.

Competitive Rivalry: Strong

Excess capacity-- fall in demand

Competitive tender to win a contract

Lowest fees to win the contract

Similar construction products

Overcrowded market

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Weak

Backward integration into the business of

suppliers

Construction materials available from many suppliers

Switching costs are low

Threat of Substitute Products or Services: Strong

New methods and processes

New methods cost less than traditional ones

Low switching costs: new project= new consultants

Bargaining Power of Buyers: Strong

Clients adopt a information

technology system for decision

making

Clients can postpone projects

Threat of New Entrants: Weak

No loyalty, the lowest bid wins

Low switching costs: new project = new consultants and suppliers

High Capital requirement

High risk of fail the target (time, cost, scope)

Difficulties to have skilled workers