51
DISRUPT YOUR BRAIN WITH DATA

Using data to disrupt your brain

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

DISRUPT YOUR BRAIN WITH DATA

LinkedIn, Medium & Twitter: @laurex

LAURE PARSONS SENIOR PRODUCT MANAGER

1. WHAT’S WRONG WITH OUR THINKING? 2. FOUR PRODUCT PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS

• ALIGNMENT • ESTIMATION • VANITY • OPPORTUNITY

@laurex

SYSTEM 1 & SYSTEM 2

Acquiescence bias

Adaptive bias

Affect heuristic

Ambiguity effect

Anchoring

Anthropic bias

Apophenia

Attentional bias

Attitude polarization

Attribute substitution

Attributional bias

Availability heuristic

Bandwagon effect

Base rate fallacy

Bias blind spot

Bias of an estimator

Closed world assumption

Clustering illusion

Cognitive bias mitigation

Cognitive closure

Confirmation bias

Conjunction fallacy

Contrast effect

Cultural bias

Default standard unit bias

Deindividualisation

Delay discounting

Disconfirmation bias

Dr. Fox Effect

Dunning–Kruger effect

Egocentric bias

Emotional forecasting

Empathy gap

Endowment effect

Error management theory

Exaggeration

Experimenter effect

False-consensus effect

False-consensus effect

False memory syndrome

Familiarity heuristic

Forer effect

Framing effects

Functional fixedness

Fundamental attribution error

Gambler's fallacy

Generation effect

Group attribution error

Group-serving bias

Groupthink

Halo effect

Hindsight bias

Hostile media effect

Illusion of asymmetric insight

Illusion of control

Illusion of transparency

Illusory correlations

Illusory superiority

Illusion of control

Illusion of transparency

Illusory correlations

Illusory superiority

Impact bias

Implicit cognition

Ingroup bias

Inductive bias

Introspection illusion

Isolation effect

Just-world hypothesis

Lake Wobegon effect

Loss aversion

Magical thinking

Mere-exposure effect

Mindset

Minimization

Misinformation effect

Name–letter effect

Negativity bias

Negativity effect

Neglect of probability

Notational bias

Oedipus effect

Optimism bias

Pareidolia

Partisan effect

Pessimism bias

Physical attractiveness stereotype

Picture superiority effect

Planning fallacy

Positive illusions

Positivity effect

Primacy effect

Projection

Publication bias

Recency effect

Regression fallacy

Repetition bias

Response bias

Rosy retrospection

Selective perception

Self-deception

Self-serving bias

Serial position effect

Social comparison bias

Spacing effect

Status quo bias

Subject-expectancy effect

Subjective validation

Sunk cost fallacy

Trait ascription bias

True-believer syndrome

Univariate bias

Valence effect

Wishful thinking

Worse-than-average effect

Zeigarnik effect

COGNITIVE BIASES

Acquiescence bias

Adaptive bias

Affect heuristic

Ambiguity effect

Anchoring

Anthropic bias

Apophenia

Attentional bias

Attitude polarization

Attribute substitution

Attributional bias

Availability heuristic

Bandwagon effect

Base rate fallacy

Bias blind spot

Bias of an estimator

Closed world assumption

Clustering illusion

Cognitive bias mitigation

Cognitive closure

Confirmation bias

Conjunction fallacy

Contrast effect

Cultural bias

Default standard unit bias

Deindividualisation

Delay discounting

Disconfirmation bias

Dr. Fox Effect

Dunning–Kruger effect

Egocentric bias

Emotional forecasting

Empathy gap

Endowment effect

Error management theory

Exaggeration

Experimenter effect

False-consensus effect

False memory syndrome

Familiarity heuristic

Forer effect

Framing effects

Functional fixedness

Fundamental attribution error

Gambler's fallacy

Generation effect

Group attribution error

Group-serving bias

Groupthink

Halo effect

Hindsight bias

Hostile media effect

Illusion of asymmetric insight

Illusion of control

Illusion of transparency

Illusory correlations

Illusory superiority

Impact bias

Implicit cognition

Ingroup bias

Inductive bias

Introspection illusion

Isolation effect

Just-world hypothesis

Lake Wobegon effect

Loss aversion

Magical thinking

Mere-exposure effect

Mindset

Minimization

Misinformation effect

Name–letter effect

Negativity bias

Negativity effect

Neglect of probability

Notational bias

Oedipus effect

Optimism bias

Pareidolia

Partisan effect

Pessimism bias

Physical attractiveness stereotype

Picture superiority effect

Planning fallacy

Positive illusions

Positivity effect

Primacy effect

Projection

Publication bias

Recency effect

Regression fallacy

Repetition bias

Rosy retrospection

Selective perception

Self-deception

Self-serving bias

Serial position effect

Social comparison bias

Spacing effect

Status quo bias

Subject-expectancy effect

Subjective validation

Sunk cost fallacy

Trait ascription bias

True-believer syndrome

Univariate bias

Valence effect

Wishful thinking

Worse-than-average effect

Zeigarnik effect

DATA DATA DATA

@laurex

SOLUTION

@laurex

-Ronald Coase, Economist

TRUTHIf you torture the data long enough, it will confess.

@laurex

PROBLEM 1: ALIGNMENT

@laurex

ULTIMATE ATTRIBUTION ERROR

@laurex

STATUS QUO BIAS

@laurex

CONFIRMATION BIAS

@laurex

BANDWAGON EFFECT+ The False Consensus Effect

@laurex

SHARED INFORMATION BIAS

@laurex

SOLUTION

@laurex

OKRS

@laurex

DRE = (Total defects found in development [A]/ (Total defects found in development[A] + Defects found in production [B] )) x 100

TEAM POLLING

CUSTOMER DATA

PROBLEM 2: ESTIMATION

@laurex

OVERCONFIDENCE

@laurex

PLANNING FALLACY

@laurex

TIME-SAVING BIAS

@laurex

SOLUTION

@laurex

@laurex

VELOCITY

@laurex

THROUGHPUT

@laurex

CYCLE TIMES

PROBLEM 3: VANITY

@laurex

CONFIRMATION BIAS

@laurex

ILLUSION OF CONTROL

@laurex

INFORMATION BIAS

@laurex

@laurex

ILLUSORY CORRELATION

SOLUTION

@laurex

NO VANITY METRICS

@laurex

COUNTER-METRICS@laurex

PROBLEM 4: OPPORTUNITY

@laurex

IKEA EFFECT

@laurex

LOSS AVERSION+ The Sunk Cost Fallacy

@laurex

NARROW FRAMING

@laurex

CONFIRMATION BIAS

@laurex

SOLUTION

@laurex

USER RESEARCH

Resist Confirmation Bias by asking open-ended questions

Combat Narrow Framing by using “and” instead of “or”

Test Reality by finding out what users are doing now and A/B test to see if your hypotheses are correct

@laurex

Teresa Torres- http://producttalk.comOPPORTUNITY DECISION TREE

A/B TESTING

@laurex

MVP

YOUR THOUGHTS?