18
Electoral Systems And how they work

Electoral systems overview

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Electoral systems overview

Electoral Systems

And how they work

Page 2: Electoral systems overview

Plurality Systems

First Past the Post• Used in UK general elections.• The country is divided into constituencies

with a single MP.• Each voter has one vote.• The candidate with the largest number of

votes wins the seat.• The party with the most seats forms the

government.

Page 3: Electoral systems overview

Advantages

• Easy for the voter to understand, cheap and inexpensive.

• Links maintained with constituencies.

• One party usually wins outright and the government is therefore strong.

• Parties have a chance to carry out their manifesto promises.

• It has been proven to work effectively.

Page 4: Electoral systems overview

Disadvantages

• Parties coming consistently second or third are underrepresented.

• Winning parties are overrepresented.• Winning governments usually only gain

40% of the total vote.• Voters in safe seats may not bother to

vote.• The govt. may have less votes than its

nearest rival.

Page 5: Electoral systems overview

Majority Systems

(The winning candidate achieves more than 50% of the vote)

The Alternative Vote System (AV)

• Voters rank candidates in order of preference.

• Any candidate with 50%+ votes is elected.

• If no-one gets 50%, votes are redistributed

• This continues until someone wins.

Page 6: Electoral systems overview

Majority Systems (cont.)

Supplementary Vote System (SVS)

• Voters have first and second choice.

• Candidates with 50%+ of votes are automatically elected.

• If no-one has 50%, all candidates are eliminated except for the top two.

• The votes of losing candidates are redistributed to second choices.

Page 7: Electoral systems overview

Majority Systems (cont.)

The Second Ballot System• If the candidate does not win more than

50% of the vote, a second ballot takes place a week or two later.

• Sometimes the candidates with the least votes are eliminated.

• This is used in France where candidates must gain 12.5%+ of the vote to stand in the second ballot.

Page 8: Electoral systems overview

Advantages

• Second or third parties are more fairly represented.

• If voters do not get their first choice, they are quite likely to get their second.

• MPs represent more members of their constituencies.

• Constituency links are maintained.• SVS was recommended by the PLANT

report as likely to produce strong govt.

Page 9: Electoral systems overview

Disadvantages

• Second or third parties can be over represented.

• AV in particular is complicated for the voters.

• Very small parties are not represented.

• Second ballot system takes a long time to produce an outright result.

• It is more expensive and time consuming.

Page 10: Electoral systems overview

Proportional Systems

List System (closed)

• Voters only vote for a party, not a person.

• The country is one large constituency.

• The parties draw up a list of candidates and puts them in order.

• Seats are allocated to parties according to the proportion of votes won.

• These seats are then filled from the lists.

Page 11: Electoral systems overview

Proportional Systems (cont.)

The List system (open)• The country is divided into large regional

constituencies.• Parties can stand as many candidates as there

are seats.• Voters choose a number of candidates.• Seats are allocated according to the number of

votes.• The most popular candidates win the seats.

Page 12: Electoral systems overview

Proportional Systems (cont.)

The Single transferable vote system

• The country is divided into large regional constituencies.

• The parties stand candidates for all the seats.

• Voters put candidates in preference order.

• Those who reach the quota are elected.

• Votes of lowest candidates are transferred

Page 13: Electoral systems overview

Advantages

• These systems are much fairer.

• Small parties are given representation.

• There are less wasted votes.

• The open list and STV do maintain links with constituencies.

• The closed list is the most directly proportional.

Page 14: Electoral systems overview

Disadvantages

• In the closed list system, only the party chooses the candidates.

• STV and open list are very complicated.

• The constituencies are much bigger or non existent.

• There is a much greater chance of a coalitional government.

• Extremists may get a voice in Parliament.

Page 15: Electoral systems overview

Hybrid Systems

Additional Member System (AMS)• This is used in Scotland and Wales.• Voters vote for a constituency MP using

First Past the Post.• They also vote for a party.• The Closed List System is used to allocate

some seats to parties.• Parties that do badly with FPTP are

compensated in through the PR seats.

Page 16: Electoral systems overview

Hybrid Systems (cont.)

AV+

• This was drawn up by the Jenkins Committee and has never been used.

• The number of constituencies is reduced to 500.

• Voters use AV to elect a constituency MP.

• The also vote for regional MPs using the Open List System.

Page 17: Electoral systems overview

Advantages

• In AMS, any unfairness of the FPTP election are compensated for with the PR seats.

• It is fairer but keeps out extremists.

• You have the advantages of two systems.

• Large scale coalition is less likely.

• People may be more likely to vote as this is a fairer system.

Page 18: Electoral systems overview

Disadvantages

• The systems are more complicated for the voter, particularly AV+.

• Small parties are still not represented.

• There is a greater chance of coalition and therefore weaker government.

• There is no real promise that more people will vote because of this system.