12

Click here to load reader

Mpsa Faas Vortrag

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Vortrag im Rahmen der 67th Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago, April 2-5, 2009Panel 21-21 “Models of Campaign Cognition”

Citation preview

Page 1: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

Chicago, April 4, 2009

Thorsten FaasUniversity of Mannheim

67th Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political ScienceAssociation in Chicago, April 2-5, 2009Panel 21-21 “Models of Campaign Cognition”

Attributions of Responsibility – Dynamics, Determinants and Consequences: The Case of the 2005 German Election

Page 2: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

1Attributions of Responsibility

• Important …

– … from an individual’s point of view

– … but also from the point of view of the political system as a whole

• Studying such attributions – their determinants, but also their effects – as an important task for political science

• However, this task has not been extensively met for a long time

• Only recently have attributions of responsibility become a matter of interest, e.g. in the field of economic voting

Page 3: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

2Determinants of Attributions of Responsibility

• ÊDefensive attributions“

• ÊMorselizing“

• ÊContextualization“

• Political sophistication, partisan rationalizations and cultural predispositions

• Campaigns

Page 4: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

3Data

• Rolling Cross-Section Survey covering the final 41 days of the 2005 German Federal Election campaign (n=3,583)

• Items:

– “What do you think, to what extent is the ruling government responsible for the development of this economic situation: to a large extent, to some extent or not at all?”

– Êthis economic situation“ refers to

• Individual’s own economic situation

• Situation of the national economy

Page 5: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

4Data

• ÊDefensive attributions“

• ÊMorselizing“

• ÊContextualization“

• Political sophistication, partisan rationalizations and cultural predispositions

• Campaigns

Perceived State of own and national economic

Situation

Interaction term

Interest in Politics, Party Identification, Left-Right-Placement

Time

Page 6: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

5Development of Level of Attributed Responsibility

0.5

1M

ea

n L

evel o

f A

ttributio

n

13.8. 20.8. 27.8. 3.9. 10.9. 17.9.date

Individual's economic situation Nation's economic situation

Page 7: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

6Determinants of Attributed Responsibility for …

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4logit coefficients

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4logit coefficients

… Individual Economic Situation … National Economic Situation

Page 8: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

7Determinants of Attributed Responsibility for …

… Individual Economic Situation

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

interaction

day

PI: other

PI: Union

PI: SPD

Left-Right

Interest

Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4logit coefficients

Page 9: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

8Predicted Probabilities

0.2

.4.6

.81

pro

babili

ty

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Individual economic situation

... very poor

... poor

... average

... good

... very good

National economic situation ...

Page 10: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

9Consequences of Attributions of Responsibility

• Kinder/Kiewiet (1979): sociotropic vs. pocketbook voting

• Empirically, sociotropic voting prevails

• But: attributions of responsibility as a potential “contingency dilemma”

• Do attributions of responsibilities moderate effects of economic perceptions (pertaining to one’s own economic situation) on feeling thermometers for Germany’s major parties?

Page 11: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

10Consequences of Attributed Responsibility for …

... feelings towards Social Democrats ... feelings towards Green Party

Ind. Econ. X Resp.

Resp. Ind. Econ.

Resp. Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

Nat. Econ.

-2 -1 0 1 2unstand. regression coefficients

Ind. Econ. X Resp.

Resp. Ind. Econ.

Resp. Nat. Econ.

Ind. Econ.

Nat. Econ.

-2 -1 0 1 2unstand. regression coefficients

Page 12: Mpsa Faas Vortrag

11Conclusions

• Studying attributions of responsibility is worthwhile. ☺

• Contact:Thorsten FaasUniversity of MannheimA5, 668131 MannheimGermany

[email protected]