1
IMAGINE a life without WiFi Internet, micro- waved food, laptops and mobile phones. Now, imagine living with an invisible, dense fog that damages your brain, heart, lungs, eyes, thyroid gland and nervous system, besides risking your preg- nancy and sending you into depression. Plenty of research has been done on the dangers of the ‘electro-smog’ that is enveloping us steadily in our increasingly wired world. Mobile phone companies and service providers challenged all research claims except the ones on radiation. Now, an IIT-Bom- bay professor, Girish Kumar, and his daughter Neha, who has done B.Tech in biotechnology, have put together the research data to highlight the damage done by the radiation that is necessary for a cellphone to function. Prof Kumar, who tracked his bloated fingers to the extraordi- nary radiation in his study, found that IIT Bombay, despite its dense foliage, could not block the radiation from a cluster of transmitting towers. This spurred him to look up available literature on the subject. There are a number of studies which have sought to establish a link between mobile phones and brain tumours, sleep problems and hearing loss. The report com- piled by Neha and Prof Kumar, who has invented a device to block radiation, also looks at other lesser known effects. A paper published by Prof Henry Lai and N.P. Singh in 1995 documented DNA damage in the brain cells of rats exposed to cell phone radiation. But the paper was contested by cell- phone manufacturers. Other studies found that mobile phone radiation can cause irreparable damage to the DNA. According to Prof Kumar’s report, when the DNA is damaged faster than it can be repaired, it can lead to cancer. Yet, rather than advocating dumping cellphones, Lai said, “If the results are confirmed in fur- ther studies, we can engineer our way out of the problems, just as we engineered the technology in the first place.” Hungarian scientists found a 30 per cent drop in sperm count in frequent mobile phone users. Not just using a mobile phone, but also carrying it in pocket could affect a man’s sperm count and the sperm motility (speed of movement). Some doctors in South Ger- many found that people living close to two transmitter anten- nas installed in 1993 and 1997 faced three-times the risk of cancer than those living 400 metres away from it. Data was gathered from nearly 1,000 patients who had been liv- ing at the same address for 10 years. The study showed that radiation within the 400 m- radius of the towers was 100 times higher compared to the outer area. Another French study showed that people living within 300 metres of a base station reported increased incidence of fatigue; those within 200 metres had more headaches, sleep distur- bance, and discomfort; and those within 100 metres reported irritability, depression, loss of memory, dizziness and drop in libido. Women were found to have more symptoms than men. Developed countries like Swe- den, France, Germany, Italy, Greece and Israel are facing the aftermath of radiation. For example, the advent of the new third generation wireless phones (and related community-wide antenna RF emissions) prompted several complaints of illness in the Netherlands. A 1998 survey by the California department of health services indicated that 1,20,000 Californi- ans, and by extrapolation one million Americans, were unable to work because of electromag- netic pollution. Overpopulated Mumbai, too, has its own share of microwave radiation. The safe limit of radi- ation for human beings is 100 microwatts per square metre. Prof Kumar’s study revealed that several residential areas had more than 1,000 microwatts per square metres. He said, “The blood-brain bar- rier, or tight junctions between adjacent cells of capillary walls, let only nutrients pass through from the blood to the brain while keeping out toxic substances. However, a research by Swedish neurosurgeon Leif Salford on microwave radiation showed albumin, a protein, managed to penetrate the barrier and dam- age the brain.” The work of Allen Frey and others indicates that microwave radiation damages similar mechanisms that protect the eye and the foetus, Prof Kumar’s report says. WHAT IS MICROWAVE RADIATION? These are electromagnetic waves with frequencies in the range of 1,000-3,00,000 MHz. All transmitting towers, such as AM and FM towers and TV and mobile phone towers, emit microwave radiation. So do wireless computers, cordless phones and their base units, cellphones and all other wireless devices, as well as home appli- ances like the microwave oven THE SILENT KILLER THE CONVENIENCE OF USING ELECTRONIC GADGETS COMES AT A HIGH COST. HERE IS A LOOK HOW WHY SHOULD WE FEAR IT? Microwave radiation can have thermal and non-thermal effects. THERMAL EFFECT| Just as the water content in any food heats up almost immediately when put inside a microwave oven, body fluids absorb microwave radiation from the atmosphere. The effect on the brain, made up 90 per cent of water, is more pronounced NON-THERMAL EFFECT| This relates to cell membrane per- meability. Current safety standards are purely based on the thermal effect — ignoring the non-thermal effects HOW DOES IT EFFECT US? The radiation can cause a host of debilitating illnesses including brain tumour, acoustic neuroma, lym- phoma, decrease in immune function, sleep disorder, anxi- ety, autism, multiple sclero- sis, Alzheimer’s disease, cataract, hypothyroidism, diabetes, malignant melanoma, testicular cancer, heart attack and strokes in young people. Children are even more vulnerable as their skulls are thinner and their nervous systems are still developing MOBILE PHONE MODEL SAR OUTPUT (W/KG) Motorola V195s 1.6 Nokia E710 1.53 LG Rumor 2 1.51 Sony Ericsson W350a 1.48 Samsung Instinct 1.46 Samsung Soul 0.24 Nokia 9300 0.21 ARE ALL APPLIANCES EQUALLY DANGEROUS? No. Radiation absorp- tion by the human body is called the specific absorption rate (SAR) and is measured in watts per kg of tissue (W/kg). Every mobile phone comes with an SAR rating. Radiation depends on the phone’s design, antenna and how it is used. Thermal effects occur when the body’s energy absorp- tion exceeds an SAR of 4 W/kg. But non-thermal effects beginning from 0.1 W/kg can harm HOW CAN WE PROTECT OURSELVES? Minimise time on cellphone and use briefly when you have to Don’t call when the signal is weak Hold the phone away from the body while calling Use headsets with a plastic air- tube between the earpiece and the phone Use a loud- speaker phone Avoid WiFi con- nections Avoid cordless phones Stay away from radiation towers >> >> >> >> >> By Seema Kamdar in Mumbai Radiating slow death Page 13 Mail Today, Monday, August 3, 2009 Cellphone radiation can cause irreparable harm to you It can lead to cancer and heart damage HE IS the full entertainment pack- age and that’s what makes Shah Rukh Khan a brand par excellence. So, if SRK calls himself the “biggest superhero” in India, no one bats an eyelid. But sometimes the “super- hero” too feels the pressure. “At times, I feel weighed down by all the titles bestowed upon me. For instance, it makes me slightly old if I am called Datuk Padma Shri Dr Shah Rukh Khan. But nonetheless, such honours bring a lot of joy,’’ says Khan. In town recently as a quizmaster for Indian Institute of Planning and Manage- ment, SRK says, “I want a certain level of maturity but I still want to be foolish.” “I want my kids to look at me as ‘old’ and ‘mature’,” SRK adds. However, when it comes to movies, the superstar is very serious. He says his next film, My Name Is Khan, is “different and interesting”. “It deals with a problem of how the world is breaking into factions. It’s not about terrorism, destruction or Muslim anger. The film explores misconceptions about religion, creed, caste and family through the eyes of an autistic man,” said the actor. Shah Rukh has high expectations from My Name Is Khan, especially since it’s been bought by Fox Studios for Rs 100 crore. “I think association with Fox is going to be wonderful because it will be the first Bollywood film produced in India but released and distributed like Hollywood films,” said Shah Rukh. The picture though is not very rosy about SRK’s other passion – his Indian Pre- mier League team — Kolkata Knight Rid- ers (KKR). “Besides picking up captain and coach, we will also try to come up with a winning formula in our next meeting on August 4,” he said. SRK denied that Sourav Ganguly had been selected as the captain. SRK is also excited about playing a superhero in his VFX-laden home pro- duction, Ra.One, despite experiencing pain. But doctors have advised Shah Rukh to avoid doing action sequences for at least two months. Well, if you happen to be India’s biggest star, your life will surely be full of action — on screen or off it. By Prashant Singh in New Delhi King Khan too gets bogged down by superhero tag Shah Rukh Khan at an event in Delhi. ‘I want a level of maturity but still be a little foolish’ PARVEEN NEGI

Radiation Slow Death

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Based on the Report prepared, this article appeared in Mail Today, a Delhi-based newspaper of the India Today group on 3rd August 2009,

Citation preview

Page 1: Radiation Slow Death

IMAGINE a life withoutWiFi Internet, micro-waved food, laptops andmobile phones. Now,imagine living with aninvisible, dense fog thatdamages your brain,heart, lungs, eyes, thyroidgland and nervous system,besides risking your preg-nancy and sending youinto depression.

Plenty of research has beendone on the dangers of the‘electro-smog’ that isenveloping us steadily in ourincreasingly wired world.

Mobile phone companies andservice providers challenged allresearch claims except the oneson radiation. Now, an IIT-Bom-bay professor, Girish Kumar,and his daughter Neha, who hasdone B.Tech in biotechnology,have put together the researchdata to highlight the damagedone by the radiation that isnecessary for a cellphone tofunction.

Prof Kumar, who tracked hisbloated fingers to the extraordi-nary radiation in his study,found that IIT Bombay, despiteits dense foliage, could not blockthe radiation from a cluster oftransmitting towers. Thisspurred him to look up availableliterature on the subject.

There are a number of studieswhich have sought to establish alink between mobile phones andbrain tumours, sleep problemsand hearing loss. The report com-piled by Neha and Prof Kumar,who has invented a device toblock radiation, also looks atother lesser known effects.

A paper published by ProfHenry Lai and N.P. Singh in 1995documented DNA damage inthe brain cells of rats exposed tocell phone radiation. But thepaper was contested by cell-phone manufacturers.

Other studies found thatmobile phone radiation cancause irreparable damage to theDNA. According to ProfKumar’s report, when the DNAis damaged faster than it can berepaired, it can lead to cancer.

Yet, rather than advocatingdumping cellphones, Lai said, “If

the results are confirmed in fur-ther studies, we can engineer ourway out of the problems, just aswe engineered the technology inthe first place.”

Hungarian scientists found a30 per cent drop in sperm countin frequent mobile phone users.Not just using a mobile phone,but also carrying it in pocketcould affect a man’s spermcount and the sperm motility(speed of movement).

Some doctors in South Ger-many found that people livingclose to two transmitter anten-nas installed in 1993 and 1997faced three-times the risk of

cancer than those living 400metres away from it.

Data was gathered from nearly1,000 patients who had been liv-ing at the same address for 10years. The study showed thatradiation within the 400 m-radius of the towers was 100times higher compared to theouter area.

Another French study showedthat people living within 300metres of a base station reportedincreased incidence of fatigue;those within 200 metres hadmore headaches, sleep distur-bance, and discomfort; andthose within 100 metres reportedirritability, depression, loss ofmemory, dizziness and drop inlibido. Women were found tohave more symptoms than men.

Developed countries like Swe-den, France, Germany, Italy,Greece and Israel are facing theaftermath of radiation. Forexample, the advent of the newthird generation wireless phones(and related community-wideantenna RF emissions)prompted several complaints ofillness in the Netherlands.

A 1998 survey by the Californiadepartment of health servicesindicated that 1,20,000 Californi-ans, and by extrapolation onemillion Americans, were unableto work because of electromag-netic pollution.

Overpopulated Mumbai, too,has its own share of microwaveradiation. The safe limit of radi-ation for human beings is 100microwatts per square metre.

Prof Kumar’s study revealedthat several residential areashad more than 1,000 microwattsper square metres.

He said, “The blood-brain bar-rier, or tight junctions betweenadjacent cells of capillary walls,let only nutrients pass throughfrom the blood to the brain whilekeeping out toxic substances.However, a research by Swedishneurosurgeon Leif Salford onmicrowave radiation showedalbumin, a protein, managed topenetrate the barrier and dam-age the brain.”

The work of Allen Frey andothers indicates that microwaveradiation damages similarmechanisms that protect theeye and the foetus, Prof Kumar’sreport says.

WHAT IS MICROWAVE RADIATION?These are electromagnetic waves withfrequencies in the range of 1,000-3,00,000MHz. All transmitting towers, such as AMand FM towers and TV and mobile phonetowers, emit microwave radiation. So dowireless computers, cordless phones andtheir base units, cellphones and all otherwireless devices, as well as home appli-ances like the microwave oven

THE SILENTKILLERTHE CONVENIENCE OF USING ELECTRONIC GADGETSCOMES AT A HIGH COST. HERE IS A LOOK HOW

WHY SHOULD WE FEAR IT?Microwave radiation can have thermal andnon-thermal effects. THERMAL EFFECT| Just as the water content inany food heats up almost immediately when putinside a microwave oven, body fluids absorbmicrowave radiation from the atmosphere. The effect on thebrain, made up 90 per cent of water, is more pronouncedNON-THERMAL EFFECT| This relates to cell membrane per-meability. Current safety standards are purely based on thethermal effect — ignoring the non-thermal effects

HOW DOES ITEFFECT US?The radiation can cause ahost of debilitating illnessesincluding brain tumour,acoustic neuroma, lym-phoma, decrease in immunefunction, sleep disorder, anxi-ety, autism, multiple sclero-sis, Alzheimer’s disease,cataract, hypothyroidism,diabetes, malignantmelanoma, testicular cancer,heart attack and strokes in young people. Children are evenmore vulnerable as their skulls are thinner and their nervoussystems are still developing

MOBILE PHONE MODEL SAR OUTPUT(W/KG)Motorola V195s 1.6Nokia E710 1.53LG Rumor 2 1.51Sony Ericsson W350a 1.48Samsung Instinct 1.46Samsung Soul 0.24Nokia 9300 0.21

ARE ALL APPLIANCESEQUALLY DANGEROUS?No. Radiation absorp-tion by the human bodyis called the specificabsorption rate (SAR)

and is measured in watts per kg of tissue(W/kg). Every mobile phone comes with an SARrating. Radiation depends on the phone’sdesign, antenna and how it is used. Thermaleffects occur when the body’s energy absorp-tion exceeds an SAR of 4 W/kg. But non-thermaleffects beginning from 0.1 W/kg can harm

HOW CAN WEPROTECTOURSELVES?� Minimise time on

cellphone anduse briefly whenyou have to

� Don’t call whenthe signal is weak

� Hold the phoneaway from thebody while calling

� Use headsetswith a plastic air-tube betweenthe earpiece andthe phone

� Use a loud-speaker phone

� Avoid WiFi con-nections

� Avoid cordlessphones

� Stay away fromradiation towers

>>

>>

>>

>>>>

By Seema Kamdarin Mumbai

Radiating slow deathPage 13Mail Today, Monday, August 3, 2009

Cellphone radiation can cause irreparable harm to you

It can lead to cancerand heart damage

HE IS the full entertainment pack-age and that’s what makes ShahRukh Khan a brand par excellence.

So, if SRK calls himself the “biggestsuperhero” in India, no one bats an

eyelid. But sometimes the “super-hero” too feels the pressure.“At times, I feel weighed down by all

the titles bestowed upon me. Forinstance, it makes me slightly old if I amcalled Datuk Padma Shri Dr Shah RukhKhan. But nonetheless, such honoursbring a lot of joy,’’ says Khan.

In town recently as a quizmaster forIndian Institute of Planning and Manage-ment, SRK says, “I want a certain level ofmaturity but I still want to be foolish.”

“I want my kids to look at me as ‘old’and ‘mature’,” SRK adds.

However, when it comes to movies, thesuperstar is very serious. He says his nextfilm, My Name Is Khan, is “different andinteresting”.

“It deals with a problem of how theworld is breaking into factions. It’s notabout terrorism, destruction or Muslimanger. The film explores misconceptions

about religion, creed, caste and familythrough the eyes of an autistic man,”said the actor.

Shah Rukh has high expectations fromMy Name Is Khan, especially since it’s beenbought by Fox Studios for Rs 100 crore.

“I think association with Fox is going to

be wonderful because it will be the firstBollywood film produced in India butreleased and distributed like Hollywoodfilms,” said Shah Rukh.

The picture though is not very rosyabout SRK’s other passion – his Indian Pre-mier League team — Kolkata Knight Rid-ers (KKR). “Besides picking up captain andcoach, we will also try to come up with awinning formula in our next meeting onAugust 4,” he said. SRK denied that SouravGanguly had been selected as the captain.

SRK is also excited about playing asuperhero in his VFX-laden home pro-duction, Ra.One, despite experiencingpain. But doctors have advised ShahRukh to avoid doing action sequences forat least two months.

Well, if you happen to be India’s biggeststar, your life will surely be full of action— on screen or off it.

By Prashant Singh in New Delhi

King Khan too gets bogged down by superhero tag

Shah Rukh Khan at an event in Delhi.

‘I want a level of maturitybut still be a little foolish’

PARVEEN NEGI