View
233
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Answers Questions about Cleanliness of 10 SECoPA States and leading Cities, using "surrogate" data from American State Litter Scorecards and Major Magazine Assessments. Presented at SECoPA, Atlanta GA, September 2014. NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE.
Citation preview
Are SECoPA States and (leading) Cities Getting “Cleaner?”THE 2014 SECoPA Southern State Litter Scorecard
Steve Spacek“American State Litter Scorecard”
The Southeastern Conference for Public AdministrationThe Marriott at Perimeter Center
Atlanta, GA
September 18, 2014
This Presentation Dedicated to :
Professor ROBERT BULLARD“Father of Environmental Justice;” Fighter against Ecological Racism!
Bullard’s classic, Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality, received ample credit in MY graduate thesis, “DO MESS WITH IT:
A Sociopolitical Study of Littering and the Role of Southern and Nearby States,” available Online and Slideshare.net
INTRODUCTION
According to Professor Bullard, with accord from Drs. Augustus Cochran and Beverly Wright, the American South is “…increasingly plagued with symptoms
produced by their [politically-induced] maladies,” leaving the region’s… [“seriously-contaminated community”] land
“the most befouled in the United States.”
One seemingly undeterred malady: The HUMAN behavior of littering and dumping
solid wastes onto public lands. This unlawful conduct breeds diseases and pests. Its deemed by experts a threat to public health and welfare.
One of this threat’s consequences: Over 180 HUMANS KILLED EACH YEAR! in vehicle crashes with
un-removed road debris in the SECoPA Southern States.
QUESTION:
ARE the SECOPA States and (leading) Cities getting “cleaner?”
Its tough to measure actual, real world results. To answer this inquiry, researchers use
commonplace “surrogates” (data elements) that adequately function to measure public performance,
address problems, or develop non-existent knowledge.
Source: Dubnick and Frederickson, Public Accountability: Performance Measurement, the Extended State and the Search for Trust.
TWO UNITS OF ANALYSIS
1. The SECoPA Southern States--
10 Governments with combined 70+ Million Total Population (2013) *Decidedly racially diverse; Politically conservative; Strong, devout religiosity
2. Leading SECoPA Cities: New Orleans, Atlanta, Memphis, Miami, others
*Total populations over 175,000; Tend to be non-white, youthful; Politically moderate-liberal
Sources: 2014, 2011, 2008 American State Litter Scorecard; Major Publications (Forbes; Readers Digest; TRAVEL+LESURE); U.S. Census Bureau
1. SECoPA Southern States
State 2008 Scorecard 2011 Scorecard 2014 Scorecard Cleaner Since 2008?
FLORIDA “below average” “above average” “best” YES
NORTH CAROLINA “worst” “best” “above average” MIXED
TENNESSEE “worst” “below average” “average” YES
MISSISSIPPI “worst” “worst” “below average” YES
ARKANSAS “worst” “below average” (36) “below average” (30) YES
ALABAMA “worst” “worst” “below average” YES
LOUISIANA “worst” “worst” “worst” NO
KENTUCKY “worst” “worst” “worst” NO
GEORGIA “below average” “worst” (42) “worst” (47) NO
SOUTH CAROLINA “worst”(42) “average” “worst” (50) NO
2. Leading SECoPA Cities
City RDigest ‘05 Forbes ‘10 Forbes ‘11 Forbes ‘12 T+L”Dirtiest’‘11 T+L”Dirtiest”‘12 Cleaner, Recent Years?
NEW ORLEANS #1 #2 NO
ATLANTA #11 #9 #5 NO
MEMPHIS #4 #9 FAINTLY
MIAMI #9 #8 #8 NO
ORLANDO #17 #17 NO
BIRMINGHAM #7 #7 NO
LOUISVILLE #11 #16 FAINTLY
BATON ROUGE #14 NO
KNOXVILLE #15 INCONCLUSIVE
TAMPA #17 INCONCLUSIVE
JACKSONVILLE #20 INCONCLUSIVE
VERDICT
ARE the SECOPA States and (leading) Cities getting “cleaner?”
RESPONSE:
As a group, SECoPA Southern State public spaces (highways, parks, trails, waterways, beaches) are seen
as (somewhat) cleaner since 2008. There’s steady adoption of proven public performance methods and citizen behaviors that
reduce litter volumes and tax-paid removal costs. Yet, top SECoPA cities have habitual illegal littering/dumping
events and deficient abatement practices.BOTH citizens, visitors suffer obnoxious conditions that shrink valued tourist and economic development dollars.
CONCLUSION
A “zero waste” movement continues to spread, from the pro-Green Far West and New England regions to ten SECoPA States, their Counties and Cities.
Polls have indicated a majority of BOTH Southerners and Americans believe governments “[are] not working enough to protect the environment, and
that economic growth should be sacrificed to do so.” Successful performances are obligatory with modern day governments.
Public litter prevention and abatement remains an ordered function of ALL SECoPA states, Counties and Cities.
Sources: Dubnick and Frederickson; Forbes, Reducing Litter on Roadsides; Gallup Organization, “Environmental Polls;” Leal and Meiners, Government versus the Environment; Staley, “Research in Review,” Waste 360.
Illegal Littering/DumpingBreeds Diseases; KILLS
Humans, Pets, Landscapes!! Copyright 2014, S. Spacek Public Service Consulting. NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE.
Check Out!! the American State Litter Scorecard MONTHLY WEBSITE:
litterscorecard.com