Upload
stephen-kwong
View
247
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
FROM GALILEAN TO EINSTEINIAN
Cosmic Adventure 5.1
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
what is wrong with them?
They are not valid when the speed of light is considered
You know what is wrong with your
equations?
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
System x:
𝑥′ = 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡
𝑦′ = 𝑦
𝑧′ = 𝑧
𝑡′ = 𝑡
System x’:
𝑥 = 𝑥′ + 𝑣𝑡
𝑦 = 𝑦′
𝑧 = 𝑧′
𝑡 = 𝑡′
Because in between frames, you should have
light speeding along
No Light Involved
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
To take the speed of light into consideration, you need to have a Lorentz transformation with the Lorentz factor! 𝛾 =
1
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
𝑥′′ =𝑥′ − 𝑣𝑡
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
𝑡′′ =𝑡′ − 𝑣𝑥′/𝑐2
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
𝑥′ =𝑥′′ + 𝑣𝑡
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
𝑡′ =𝑡′′ + 𝑣𝑥′′/𝑐2
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
Relativistic Equations
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
𝛾 =1
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
Where did you this funky Lorentz factor come from?
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Normally I would not tell where I get these equations. But for this competition, I have to do so because Angela already knew it.
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Beam
BBeam A
Viewer
Light Path Geometry [at Rest] on plan
These equations came from Michelson’s concept of the experiment itself.
In the absence of aether wind, the two lights will recombine at the viewer in sync. No fringe will be observed.
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Bea
m B
Beam A
Viewer
Light Path Geometry According to Michelson
According to Michelson, the two lights will pursue different paths due to the influence of the aether wind.
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Michelson’s Working Equation
𝐷𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝐴
=2𝑙𝑜
𝑐 1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2
𝐷𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝐵
=2𝑙𝑜
𝑐 1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2
In the experiment there are two durations of time for the two beams.
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
The ratio between the Times of the Beams
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝐴
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝐵
=2𝑙𝑜
𝑐 1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2÷
2𝑙𝑜
𝑐 1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2
=2𝑙𝑜
𝑐 1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2×𝑐 1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2
2𝑙𝑜
=1
1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2
1
1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
This factor was later brought up by Albert Lorentz in his postulate of time dilation to explain the experiment. I got inspired and made use of it in my theory.
In its turn, the factor accounts for failure of the Michelson-Morley experiment to produce the desired results.
1
1 − 𝑣2/𝑐2
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Looking at your equations, it is obvious the major variable is the relative velocity 𝑣. What if both systems are at rest?
𝑥′′ =𝑥′ − 𝑣𝑡
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
𝑡′′ =𝑡′ − 𝑣𝑥′/𝑐2
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
Relativistic Equations
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
Then 𝑣 will become zero and the equations will revert to the starting point.
𝑥′′ =𝑥′ − 𝑣𝑡
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
→ 𝑥′
𝑡′′ =𝑡′ − 𝑣𝑥′/𝑐2
1 −𝑣2
𝑐2
= 𝑡′
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
What about when the observer and the object are at rest and are separated by a distance s?
They are not moving, so 𝑣 is again 0. 0’
𝑥′
P
𝑥′′
0’’ P
𝑠
© ABCC Australia 2015 new-physics.com
VISONIC TRANSFORM WITHOUT MOTION
To be continued on Cosmic Adventure 5.2