54
Soil pollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya Mohanpur-741252 District: Nadia West Bengal Mohanpur-741252 District: Nadia West Bengal Dr. P.K. Mani Lecturer (Res), Sr. Scale [email protected] artment of Agricultural Chemistry & Soil Sci AICRP on Cropping Systems, Kalyani Centre Winter school presentation

Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

  • Upload
    pk-mani

  • View
    906

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Soil pollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity

Bidhan Chandra Krishi ViswavidyalayaMohanpur-741252 District: Nadia West BengalMohanpur-741252 District: Nadia West Bengal

Dr. P.K. ManiLecturer (Res), Sr. Scale

[email protected]

Department of Agricultural Chemistry & Soil ScienceAICRP on Cropping Systems, Kalyani Centre

Winter school presentation

Page 2: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Fig. 1: How healthy soil is linked with healthy people

Page 3: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Rocks in Earth’scrust

Air

Soil

Water

Plants

Birds

Domesticanimals

Fish

Humans

 Source: Brady, N. C. The nature and properties of soil, 1994 Sources of heavy metals and their cycling in the soil-water-air organism ecosystem. 

 

Industrial ProductsBurned fuelFertilizersPesticides

It should be noted that the content of metals in tissue generally builds up from left to right, indicating the vulnerability of humans to heavy metal toxicity

Page 4: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Heavy metalHeavy metal

Transition metals

Ia IIaIIIa IVa Va VIa VIIa

Ib IIb

Lanthanides

Actinides

Page 5: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Oxidative stress: Redox active transition metals (e.g. Fe2+, Cu2+) produce free radicals

Replace other essential metals in pigments and enzymes

Some metal ions (Hg2+, Cu2+) react to thiol groups to interfere protein structure and functions

Some metals occur as radioactive isotopes (238U, 137Cs etc.) to pose health risks`

Why metals are toxic to living organisms?Why metals are toxic to living organisms?

Page 6: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Chemical Major uses and sources of soil contamination

Arsenic Pesticides, plant desiccants, animal feed additives, coal and petroleum, mine tailings and detergents

Cadmium Electroplating, pigments for plastics and paints, plastic stabilizers and batteries, fertilizers

Chromium Stainless steel, chrome–plated metals, pigments and refractory brick manufacture

Copper Mine tailings, fly ash, fertilizers, wind blown copper-containing dust

Lead Combustion of oil, gasoline, and coal; iron and steel production

Mercury Pesticides, catalysts for synthetic polymers, metallurgy, thermometers

Nickel Combustion of coal, gasoline, and oil; alloy manufacture, electroplating, batteries

Zinc Galvanized iron and steel, alloys, batteries, brass, rubber manufacture

 Source: Moore and Ramamoorthy (1984)

Page 7: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Anthropogenic sources of heavy

metals in soil

TanneryBatteryDistillery

Steel Fly ash

Electroplating Mining

Smelting

Page 8: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Global Emissions of trace Metals into theGlobal Emissions of trace Metals into the Atmosphere, Water and Soil Atmosphere, Water and Soil

ElementAir Water Soil

(in 1000 metric tones/yr)

As 18.8 41.0 82.0Cd 7.6 9.4 22.0Cr 30.0 142.0 896.0Cu 35.0 112.0 954.0Hg 3.6 4.6 8.3Mn 38.0 262.0 1670.0Mo 3.3 11.0 88.0Ni 56.0 113.0 325.0Pb 332.0 138.0 796.0Sb 3.5 18.0 26.0Vd 86.0 12.0 132.0Zn 132.0 226.0 1372.0

Third North Sea Conference( Nriagu,1988)

Page 9: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

ElementElement Essential or beneficial toEssential or beneficial to Potential toxicity toPotential toxicity to   PlantsPlants AnimalsAnimals PlantsPlants AnimalsAnimalsArsenic (As)Arsenic (As) NoNo YesYes YesYes YesYes

CadmiumCadmium(Cd)(Cd) NoNo NoNo YesYes YesYes

ChromiumChromium(Cr)(Cr) NoNo YesYes YesYes DUDUCobalt (Co)Cobalt (Co) YesYes YesYes YesYes YesYesCopper (Cu)Copper (Cu) YesYes YesYes YesYes YesYesbb

Lead (Pb)Lead (Pb) NoNo NoNo YesYes YesYesMarcury (Hg)Marcury (Hg) NoNo NoNo DUDUaa YesYes

Molyb (Mo)Molyb (Mo) YesYes YesYes DUDU YesYesbb (5-20 ppm) (5-20 ppm)

Nickel (Ni)Nickel (Ni) NoNo YesYes YesYes YesYesSeSe YesYes YesYes YesYes Yes(4ppm)Yes(4ppm)Zinc (Zn)Zinc (Zn) YesYes YesYes DUDU DUDUa DU = Critical data on limits unavailable.b Toxic to ruminants (sheep, cattle).After Adriano 1986.

Page 10: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Sewage sludge –a potential threat to heavy metal pollution in Indian soils

Fly-Ash: A meanace to the environment

Ground water pollution- Nitrate and ArsenicGround water pollution- Nitrate and Arsenic

Nuclear fallout and radioactive hazardsNuclear fallout and radioactive hazards

Inorganic fertilsersInorganic fertilsers

Tanery efflents and Waste waterTanery efflents and Waste water

Page 11: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

 Some of the potentially adverse Environmental and Health effects Caused by forms of Nitrogen

Effect Causative AgentEnvironmental quality  

Eutrophication Nitrogen sources in surface waters

Corrosive damage HNO3 in rainfall (acid rain)

Ozone layer depletion Nitrous oxides from fuels, denitrificationAnd industrial stack emissions

Human Health  

Methemoglobinemia Excess NO3– and NO2

– in water and food

In infants, livestock  

Respiratory illness PANs and other nitrogen oxides

Cancer Nitrosamines from NO2– and

secondary Amines in food Soils- An Introduction to Soils and Plant Growth, Miller and Donahue

Page 12: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Heavy metal concentrations in soil amendments, expressed in Heavy metal concentrations in soil amendments, expressed in ppmppmon a dry weight basison a dry weight basis

Soil amendment Cd Co Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn

Triple superphosphate 9 5 92 3 36 3 108(0-46-0)

Urea (46-0-0) <0.1 <1 <3 <0.4 <1 <3 <1

Potassium chloride <0.1 2 <3 <0.6 4 3 <1(0-0-60)

Agricultural lime <0.1 <1 <3 <0.2 5 <3 <2

Cow manure 1 6 56 62 29 16 71

Sewage sludgea 5 5 350 660 35 980 800

After Freedman and Hutchinson 1981, except aWebber and Nichols 1995

Page 13: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Contents of some heavy metals in fertilizers and sludges

Source Metal mg/kg dry material

Cd Cr Cu Pb Zn

Ammonim Niitrate (A/N)

1.1 2.5 3.6 5.4 11.7

SSP 16.6 157.0 22.6 20.6 244.0

Compound 8-10-8

4.9 54.3 8.3 3.2 97.5

Sewage Sludge 20.0 500.0 250.0 700.0 3000.0

Source: Pain et al., 1991

Page 14: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Heavy metal composition of sewage sludge from different cities in India

City Cu Zn Cd Cr Ni Pb

  mg/kg

Ahmedabad

535 2147 3.5 60.4 32.3 76.8

Delhi 440 1610 5.5 53.5 81.5 34.5

Nagpur 272 832 1.5 49.2 14.8 24.3

Chennai 210 935 8.3 38.5 60.5 16.6

Jaipur 265 1720 7.3 17.6 37.5 66.9

Source : Maity et al (1992).

Page 15: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Reported range (mg/kg dry digested sludge)

Element

Minimum Maximum As 1.1 230 Cd 1.0 3410 Co 11.3 2990 Cu 84.0 17000 Cr 10.0 99000 F 80.1 33500 Hg 0.60 56 Mn 32.0 9870 Pb 13.0 26000 Se 1.70 17.2 Zn 101.0 49000

Concentrations of Trace elements in Municipal Sewage Sludges

Source: Lagon, T.J. (1990) Advances in Soil Science, Vol. 11

Page 16: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

       Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil and Plant (mg/g)  Zn Cu Pb Cd Cr

Soils of Dhapa 1038-1256 154-196 79-113 0.38-0.52 9.1-17.0

Spinach 320-340 60-72 60-82 0.8-2.2 6.5-15.8

CauliflowerHead

300-1100 20-30 30-90 Trace 5.2-5.7

Source: S. K. Gupta et al., 1997, Calcutta University Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Rohu fish (1.5 kg) on dry weight Basis (g/g)

Parts Zn Cu Pb Cd Cr

Brain 3.2 trace 2.9 0.4 11.3

Muscle 29.1 3.4 2.4 0.5 0.9

Liver 53.1 79.5 3.3 6.1 3.2

Kidney 62.6 8.9 11.9 12.3 14.9

Source: Dr. R. N. Bhattacharyya, Head, CPCB, Kolkata, 1997

Page 17: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

DTPA-extractable heavy metal in soils under different crops irrigated with sewage and underground water

Crop Source of irrigation

water

Zn Fe Cu Mn Cd

mg/kg

Berseem Sewage 13.4 75.3 24.4 33.2 0.119

  Underground 4.2 38.0 7.8 28.4 0.074

Spinach Sewage 41.2 65.6 32.2 28.8 0.253

  Underground 4.2 59.4 7.0 24.4 0.079

Coriander Sewage 21.1 69.0 49.4 23.0 0.208

  Underground 6.6 32.4 9.5 18.4 0.054

Source : Sharma and Kansal (1986).

Page 18: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Some characteristics of waste water from domestic and industrial locations in Ludhiana – An industrial city of Punjab

Location pH BOD Cr Ni CN

    mg/kg

ElectroplatingIndustry

6.2-7.2 60-380 0.2-2.5 1.0-3.0 0.42-0.97

Sugar Industry

7.1-7.9 1058-1640

- - -

Paper Industry 7.0-10.1 560-1113 - - -

Household 6.7-7.8 80-460 0.1-0.2 0.2-2.0 0.05-0.07

Max. limits for disposal on agril. land

5.5-9.0 100 0.1 0.005 0.2

Source : Tiwana et al (1987). 

Page 19: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Tolerance limits for disposal of tannery effluentsParameters Effluents to be discharged

  Into inland surface water

On land for irrigation

pH 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0

BOD (mg.L-1) 30 100

Suspend solids 100 200

Chloride (as Cl) 1000 200

Cr 2.0 2.0

Sulphides 2.0 -

Na+ - 60

Oil and grease 10 10

Source: Environmental (Protection ) Rules (1986)

Page 20: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Recommended maximum concentrations (ppm) of heavy metals in soils based on their cation exchange capacities (CEC)

CECa Cu Co Hg Cd Cr Zn Pb Ni

CEC>15 50 34 0.14 2.4 120 160 70 60

CEC<15 25 >17 0.07 1.2 0 80 35 30

aMeasured as milliequivalents per 100 grams.Source: Giroux et al. 1992.

“In agriculture CEC is next to photosynthesis ”-C.E .Marshal

Page 21: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Ash (generated from coal combustion) which is fine and carried away with the flue gases is known as FA

Fly ash (FA) is finely divided residue resulting from the combustion of pulverized bituminous coal or lignite

FA is gray in colour, abrasive, acidic, refractory in nature, fineness 4000-8000 sq. cm/g, size 5-120 equivalent diameterFA is essentially an Amorphous ferroaluminosilicate minerals Concentration of heavy metals in sized fractions of Fly-ashParticle size Cr Mn Ni Pb Cd Cu

µg/g (average)>150 67 355 86 86 15 67

150-106 78 368 98 54 16 66106-75 86 425 98 62 15 6475-53 80 445 102 59 13 69<53 87 390 116 56 13 80

Average 80 396 100 57 14 61 Fulekar and Dave, 1986Fulekar and Dave, 1986

Page 22: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Concentration of HM in coal ash generated in power plants of West Bengal

BTPS KTPS STPS DTPS FSTPS

Cr 20-100 40-80 80-200 <10-20 120-180Cu 10-25 20-30 10-15 <10-15 10-20Pb 10-20 10-40 10-35 <10-50 10-45Mn 150-1000 300-2100 150-800 200-1000 400-800Ni 10-35 74 - - -V 15-90 - 15-150 - -Mo - <10 <10 <10 <10Zn - 200 200 200 200Cd - BDL - - -

After: Saha, A. K., CSME, Kolkata

Page 23: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Nitrate concentration in Ground waters amples from Tubewells located in Cultivated areas of Punjab

BlockBlockNo. of No. of samplessamples

Mean NOMean NO3 3

mg/lmg/lN-fert.applicationN-fert.application

kg/ha/yrkg/ha/yr

DehlonDehlon 8484 17.017.0 249.0249.0

LudhianaLudhiana 3333 13.813.8 258.0258.0

SudharSudhar 4343 17.417.4 242.0242.0

KartarpurKartarpur 3434 12.112.1 193.0193.0

JandialaguruJandialaguru 2424 18.318.3 172.0172.0

MalerkotlaMalerkotla 1818 17.817.8 151.0151.0

Bajwa et al. 1992Bajwa et al. 1992

Page 24: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Gary Bañuelos, Soil Scientist with the USDA Agricultural Research Service, inspects the leaves of a transgenic Indian mustardIndian mustard plant used to remove seleniumselenium from contaminated soil. (Photo by Stella Zambrzuski, USDA ARS)

Page 25: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Canola and Kenaf plants do a good job of cleaning up of soil and water contaminated with Selenium

Page 26: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

The ultimate solution is to volatilise Se completely from the ecosystem using plants like Indian mustardIndian mustard and pickleweedpickleweed that convert toxic selenateselenate and seleniteselenite into volatile non-toxic Se forms such as dimethyl selenidedimethyl selenide. A recent breakthrough has enabled Prof Terry'Terry's team to genetically engineer Indian mustard to enhance the rate of Se volatilisation. Both Prof Terry and Dr David Salt10 from Purdue University are looking at ways to use plants like Indian mustard11 to clean up cadmium-laden soils.

Page 27: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Arsenic source in groundwater in the Ganga basin

Holocene periodHolocene period

Basalt rock

Page 28: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

NArsenic affected districts of West Bengal, India

108 blocks108 blocks

Page 29: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

 

Air As2O5 As2O3 (CH3)3As (CH3)2AsO(OH) Water Oxidation H3AsO4 H3AsO3 (CH3)3As (CH3)2AsH microbes Sediment biomethylation AsO2(OH)2

- AsO(OH) (CH3)2AsO(OH) redn. FeAsO4 As2S3 (CH3)3As

Arsenic speciation in soil, water and air

Page 30: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

The Eh -pH diagram for As at 250C,1 atm. with total arsenic 10-5 mol L-1 and total sulfur 10-3 mol L-1 (Ferguson and Gavis,1972)

Eh , V

olts

pH

Page 31: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Source: Arsenic is a new terror; Asit Kumar Roy; Desh

DRAWDOWN

Radius of influence

Cone of Depression

WTVadose zone

Arsenopyrite

Darcy’s Law

Pitticite

Page 32: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Crop Arsenic conc. (mg/kg) at harvest

Leaf Stem Root Eco. ProduceEle-foot-yam 4.30 8.0 - 4.0Green gram 5.10 4.9 4.7 4.3Cowpea 4.91 5.1 5.2 2.1Maize 3.30 6.2 5.2 2.6Rice (boro) 10.2 5.7 5.9 10.0Jute 3.5 8.0 6.8 4.0Potato 3.9 9.3 - 5.9Mustard 7.1 9.8 5.7 3.3Ground nut 2.0 2.0 2.2 4.0Sesame 2.0 2.0 4.0 0.6 Crops were subjected to irrigation with water containing 0.22 mg As / lit of water Soil had an Olsen-extractable arsenic content of 1.23 to 1.37 mg/kg of soil (initial) Source : Prof. S. K. Sanyal Source : Prof. S. K. Sanyal

Arsenic uptake by different plant parts of crops grown in Gotera, Chakdah

Page 33: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Measured total Arsenic content in the various plant parts

Total arsenic is not so fatal-it is only the Total arsenic is not so fatal-it is only the trivalent form which is highly toxic than trivalent form which is highly toxic than other other formsforms So we need speciation of arsenicSo we need speciation of arsenic

Speciation of arsenic can be done by Flame Speciation of arsenic can be done by Flame Ionisation Atomic Spectrometer (FIAS) Ionisation Atomic Spectrometer (FIAS) attachment in AASattachment in AAS

Page 34: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Mechanism of As mobilization in groundwater in Bengal Basin

Hypothesis1 ‘ Pyrite oxidation hypothesis’ Arsenic rich iron bearing minerals like “Arsenopyrite” may be present in the aquifer sediments. Aresenopyrite is being oxidized by atmospheric oxygen which invades the aquifer in response to lowering of groundwater level (Mandal et al. 1996)  Hypothesis 2 ‘Oxyhydroxide reduction hypothesis’ ii)         The burial of the sediments, rich in organic matter, has led to strongly reducing groundwater conditions. Arsenic may be released when arsenic-rich iron oxyhydroxides, which are efficient arsenic –scavengers, are reduced in anoxic groundwater. Order of toxicity : AsH3 > (CH3)2AsH, > (CH3)3As >As2O3 >H3AsO3 >As2O5 > H3AsO4 Max. Health permissible limit in drinking water : 0.05 ppm (WHO) Biochemical effects

SH O S + As O- As O-

SH O S enzyme

enzyme

Page 35: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Arsenic affected people of Chakdaha blockArsenic affected people of Chakdaha block

Can Arsenicum 30 reduce the toxicity?Can Arsenicum 30 reduce the toxicity?A

R

S

E

N

I

C

O

S

I

S

Page 36: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Then what is the way out???Then what is the way out???

PHYTOREMEDIATION

THE GREEN-CURE TECHNOLOGY

Page 37: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Natural Microbial Bioremediators On March 24, 1989, an oil tanker ( Exxon Valdez) crashed into a reef

Alaska, spilling 11 million gallons of oil . 10 weeks after the spill, the U.S.E.P.A applied P and N fertilizers to 750 oil-soaked sites.

Hudson River in New York with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by the Company GEC

Buried anaerobic bacteria strip off chlorines. In the water column, aerobic bacteria cleave the two organic rings of the

PCBs. Other microorganisms degrade the dechlorinated, broken rings into

CO2,H2O,Cl . Natural Plant Bioremediators Hyperaccumulators, cope with excess heavy metals in the environment by

taking them in and sequestering them in vacuoles. Chelation : when the plant combines a pollutant with another molecule,

Organic acids often serve this role. Citric acid, detoxifies cadmium, and malic acid does the same for zinc.

phytochelatins -a class of polypeptides can also bind metals and escort them .

metal-lothioneins - metal-binding proteins

Page 38: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Natural phytoremediators. Sebertia acuminata, a tree ( tropical rain forest of New Caledonia, Australia.) Up to 20 percent of the tree's dry weight is Ni If slashed, the bark oozes a bright green. This plant can perhaps be used to clean up nickel-contaminated soil. Soybeans also preferentially take up nickel from soil. Another phytore-mediator is Astragalus, also know as locoweed (accumulates Se)

Genetically Modified Bioremediators

Super bug-Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty (1980) GEC

The four plasmids in the oil eater gave the bacterium the ability to degrade four components of crude oil. Plasmids are rings of DNA that can be transferred from one cell to another

Page 39: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

What is phytoremediation?

“Use of green plants to remove pollutants from the environment or render them harmless”

Salt et al. (1998)

This concept has emerged from a broader philosophy of Bioremediation where besides plants, soil microorganisms are also used for amelioration of organic and inorganic contaminants

Page 40: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Phytoextraction Phytodegradation Rhizofiltration Phytostabilization Phytovolatilization

Phytoremediation

D i f f e r e n t a p p r o a c h e s o f p h y t o r e m e d i a t i o n

A c c u m u l a t io n o f m e t a l s i n s h o o t t i s s u e s f o l l o w e d b y h a r v e s t i n g

U s e o f p l a n t s a n d a s s o c i a t e d m i c r o b e s t o d e g r a d e o r g a n i c p o l l u t a n t s

U s e o f p l a n t r o o t s t o a b s o r b a n d a d s o r b m e t a l s f r o m a q u e o u s w a s t e s t r e a m

R e d u c t i o n i n l e a c h i n g , r u n o f f , s o i l e r o s i o n a n d b i o a v a i l a b i l i t yo f t o x i c m e t a l s

U s e o f p l a n t s t o v o l a t i l i z e p o l l u t a n t s

Page 41: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Advantages and disadvantages of PhytoremediationAdvantages and disadvantages of PhytoremediationAdvantages Limitations

Amendable to a variety of organic and inorganic compounds

Restricted to sites with shallow contamination within rooting zone of remediative plants

In Situ/Ex Situ application possible with effluent/soil

May take up several years to remediate a contaminated site

In Situ applications decrease the amount of soil disturbance

Restricted to sites with low contaminant concn.

Reduces the amount of waste to be landfilled(upto 95%), can be further utilized as bio ore of heavy metals

Harvested plant biomass from phytoextraction may be classified as a hazardous waste

In Situ applications decrease spread of contaminant via air and water

Climatic conditions are limiting factor

Page 42: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

HYPERACCUMULATOR

INDICATOR

EXCLUDERPLANT

Metal concentration in Soil

Conceptual response strategies of metal concentration in plant tops in relation to increasing total metal concentrations in soil

Page 43: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Possible fates of pollutants during phytoremediation

Hydrophobicity (log Kow)

Henry’s law constant (Hi)

Page 44: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Pteris vittata (Chinese brake) – a reported hyper-accumulator for arsenic

Page 45: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Chelate-assisted phytoremediation is most promising management practice

Salt et al., 1998

Page 46: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

After, Ma et al. 2000

Page 47: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Uptake,transport and metabolism in transgenic A. thaliana plants overexpressing two bacterial genes, arsC and Y-ECS(gamma glutamyl cysteine synthatase.

Page 48: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Tolerance mechanisms for inorganic and organic pollutants in plant cells.

Detoxification generally involves conjugation followed by active sequestration in the vacuole and apoplast,where the pollutant can do the least harm

Pollutant(inorg)

Pollutant(organic)

Cell Wall

VacuoleVacuole

SequestrationSequestration

Conjugation

GSH,Glutathion

MT, Metallothioneins

Phytochelatins

Page 49: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Disposal of hyper-accumulator plant refuse

Harvest

Incineration

Controlled disposal of ash to underground – away from root zone and aquifer

Phytomining

Jade green alkaloid from cut stem of Phyllanthus palawanensis contains 88,580 µg Ni g-1 dry weight

Page 50: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Bio-accumulation coefficients of Brassica sp. at maturity stage

Species Zn Cu Ni Pb Yield*

B. juncea 6.83 3.08 3.21 12.86 25.40

B. campestris

12.48 2.59 13.61 2.56 18.66

B. carinata 11.89 1.94 12.30 17.72 37.70

B. napus 9.87 1.14 8.98 9.37 31.70

B. nigra 9.56 2.04 8.66 7.94 31.04

*Above ground biomass yield expressed in g/potBioaccumulation coefficient: Metal content in plant biomass Labile metal content in soil

Page 51: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Novel Finding!

For the first time Brassica carinata is being reported as a possible

hyper-accumulator for Zn, Ni and Pb

Chhonker et al, 2004Chhonker et al, 2004

Page 52: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Defective baby due to radioactivity is known as Down’s syndrome

Radioactivity due to nuclear fall out leads several pollution to soil

Source of radioactive contamination:

    Fallout from testing of nuclear weapons    Waste products and effluents from nuclear reactors  Sr90 , Cs137, I131

Max. permissible limit of absorbing radiation : 0.5 REM

Page 53: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

The chemicals to which life is asked to make its adjustment are . . . the synthetic creations of man's inventive mind, brewed in his laboratories, and having no counterparts in nature.

Rachel CarsonSilent Spring

Page 54: Soilpollution with special reference to heavy metal toxicity and possible mitigation option

Upon this handful of soil

Our Survival dependsHusband it & it will

growOur food, fiber & fuel& surround us with

beauty,Abuse it, the soil will

degrade& collaspe taking mankind with it