24
SuperSite field survey protocol development Mirko Karan, SuperSites Coordinator

Supersite field survey protocol development

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Supersite field survey protocol development

SuperSite field survey protocol development

Mirko Karan, SuperSites Coordinator

Page 2: Supersite field survey protocol development

What is a TERN SuperSite?

1) An intensive field station in a typical and important biome

2) Physical instrumentation3) Scientists and technical support staff4) Transect(s) or Contrasts (10-400km)

Page 3: Supersite field survey protocol development

Question driven, consistent network-wide monitoring

CURRENT STATUS: ecosystem condition, functional patterns and spatial arrangement

- stocks and fluxes of energy, carbon and water

MONITORING: response to environmental change, natural disturbance and human induced disturbance

- ecophysiological responses - changes in community composition

PREDICTIONS: Can environmental thresholds or 'tipping points' be identified and solutions suggested to avoid state change?

Local scientific questions

Page 4: Supersite field survey protocol development

FNQ Rainforest

SEQ Peri-urban

Evolution of the SuperSites

Page 5: Supersite field survey protocol development

2011 expansion to 5 SuperSites Collaborative Co-contribution modelExisting research activity and co-contribution, Government supportSignificant Australian biomeTerrain suitable for eddy co-variance flux tower

Australian SuperSite Network Growth

FNQ Rainforest

SEQ Peri-urban

Warra Tall Eucalypt

Calperum Mallee

Great Western Woodland

Page 6: Supersite field survey protocol development

2012 additional five volunteer SuperSites

Australian SuperSite Network Growth

FNQ Rainforest

SEQ Peri-urban

Cumberland Plain

Tumbarumba Wet EucalyptVictorian Dry Eucalypt

Warra Tall Eucalypt

Calperum Mallee

Alice Mulga

Litchfield Savanna

Great Western Woodland

Page 7: Supersite field survey protocol development

2014 Network of 10 SuperSites

Australian SuperSite Network Growth

FNQ Rainforest

SEQ Peri-urban

Cumberland Plain EucFACE

Tumbarumba Wet Eucalypt

Victorian Dry Eucalypt

Warra Tall Eucalypt

Calperum Mallee

Alice Mulga

Litchfield Savanna

Great Western Woodland

Page 8: Supersite field survey protocol development
Page 9: Supersite field survey protocol development

measures ecosystem fluxes• CO2 (NEE) and water use (ET)• Energy: Radiation (Q) and heat (H, G)

Aerial LiDAR and Hyperspectral surveys PhenocamsDigital Elevation ModelsTerrestrial Laser Scanning

Plant trait / ecophysiology campaign 2010-14

Page 10: Supersite field survey protocol development

Protocol working groups + alignment with AusPlots protocols

Vegetation core 1 ha plotBiodiversity - Vascular plant list, voucher specimens, genetic sampling

Abundance, Cover, Structure - Structural description - Direct measure stems DBH ≥10

cm, H

DBH <10 cm (forest/rangelands methods)- Standing Above Ground Biomass- Course Woody Debris- Recruitment, seedling transects- Photopoints- Leaf Area Index (DCP/DHP)- Phenocams (ex AusCover)

Protocol Development

Page 11: Supersite field survey protocol development

Protocol working groups + alignment with AusPlots protocols

FaunaAcoustic Recording

Bird surveys

Ant sampling - pitfall traps

Protocol Development

Page 12: Supersite field survey protocol development

Protocol working groups + alignment with AusPlots protocols

Soil and waterInitial site and soil characterisation - soil profile OzFlux pit, dry bulk density, soil chem to 1.5m

OzFlux instrumentation - soil temp, moisture

Digital Elevation Model

Core 1 ha physico-chemistry (9 bulked cores 0-10cm, 10-30cm)

Soil metabarcoding

Logging Bore

Stream monitoring

Protocol Development

Page 13: Supersite field survey protocol development
Page 14: Supersite field survey protocol development

SuperSite Protocols Current MonitoringPhenocams

Leaf Area Index

Acoustic MonitoringPhotopoints

Campaign ModeSoil microbe metabarcodingLidar, Hyperspectral surveys (AusCover)

Bird surveysAnt samplingBores Vascular plant listRecruitment/seedlings Coarse woody debris

Cosmos sensorsPlant Functional TraitsEcophysiologyCamera traps?tower sensors ?spatial extent?

International ExperimentsNutrient NetworkDroughtNetGlobal Malaise TrappingEarth MicroBiome Project

Page 15: Supersite field survey protocol development
Page 16: Supersite field survey protocol development

334 data packages

Page 17: Supersite field survey protocol development

Allows listening to recordings and download of files

Analysis tools to be added

29 744 files, 19 sites

Page 18: Supersite field survey protocol development

Phenocamera imagesLeaf Area index imagesPhotopointsPanoramic photopoints

Australian Phenocam Networkhttps://phenocam.org.au/

Page 19: Supersite field survey protocol development

陆地生态系统生物观测规范

陆地生态系统生物观测规范

陆地生态系统生物观测规范

陆地生态系统生物观测规范

Page 20: Supersite field survey protocol development

Challenges to address going forward:

- Standardising data formats - template driven- Improving QA QC procedures (data collection, ingestion)- Improving sensors (phenocams, acoustics)- Staffing levels and training in diverse field techniques- Assessing representativeness of plots, repetition- Valuing data set publication / citation to incentivize co-contribution

Collaborations, inter-operability

Within TERN - Calibration/validation (AusCover)- Modelling: eMAST, AusPlots, Transects, LTERN +

International - Calibration / validation (soil moisture, biomass, LAI)- Data use/reuse, modelling

Page 21: Supersite field survey protocol development
Page 22: Supersite field survey protocol development

SuperSite extrasPlant ecophysiology (leaf Ps, Resp. water relations)Acoustic recordingCourse woody debrisAntsBores

Comparisons with NEON protocols

SimilaritiesPlots + Remote sensingVegetation (structure/composition)Flux tower sensors (CO2, phenocams etc)Soil sensors (T, moisture)Soil physico-chemistrySoil microbial diversityVegetation diversity and abundanceLeaf Area IndexBird diversity and abundanceStream monitoring

NEON extrasNEON Strategic design - plot locationsCore site + relocatable sitesFlux tower sensors (dust, PAR, isotopes CO2/H2O)Soil sensors (array, CO2, Throughfall etc)Soil coarse and fine root biomassSmall mammalsGround beetlesMosquito (diversity, abundance, phenology, pathogens)Ticks (pathogens)(Litterfall)

Page 23: Supersite field survey protocol development

NCRIS-2013 Vegetation protocolsCore 1 ha plotVascular plant list - voucher specimensAbundance, Cover, StructureForests - Direct measures (stems ≥ 10 cm DBH); RAINFOR Gentry transects (stems < 10 cm DBH ); seedling transects Rangelands - Direct measures (stems ≥ 10 cm DBH); Basal wedges; Point intercept method (augmented AusPlots)

Biomass - Woody plant DBH, Height, Species, Coarse Woody Debris, Clip plots,

Leaf Area Index - DCP, DHP, Point Intercept Method / clip plots PhotopointsPhenocameras (Auscover/Ozflux) - based on ACEAS workshop 2014

Page 24: Supersite field survey protocol development

Soil and Water protocolsCore 1 ha plot

Initial site and soil characterisation- Soil pit at flux tower, profile, bulk density, physico-chem analysis- 9 distributed cores for physico-chem analysis

Digital Elevation Model (Auscover)Soil instrumentation (Ozflux)- Soil volumetric water content, soil temp, soil heat flux

Soil metagenomics - 16S Bact/archea; ITS Fungi; 18S Euk/algal (Baseline)

Stream monitoring – flow, pH, N, P, major ions, EC etc

Bore(s) - depth logging, pH, N, P, major ions, EC etc