40
Religi ous Schism (the Aglipayan Church)

Relgious schism

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

this shows and illustrate the history of the tangible result of revolutio

Citation preview

Page 1: Relgious schism

Religious

Schism

(the Aglipayan Church)

Page 2: Relgious schism

Archbishop Bernardino NozaledaAnd Gen. Basilio Augustine

VS.Revolutionary leaders:Artemio ricarteMariano TriasEmiliano Regio de Dios

Page 3: Relgious schism

Archbishop Bernardino Nozaleda

Gregorio Aglipay

Emilio Aguinaldo

Page 4: Relgious schism

Aglipay go to north to investigate the condition of the bishopric in Nueva Segovia and he secured the release of two Jesuit priest

Page 5: Relgious schism

Aglipay went back to Manila to report to Nozaleda BUT…..it was

besieged

Page 6: Relgious schism

October 20,1898 –

Aguinaldo appoint Aglipay as

Vicar General,

this made Aglipay to be the religious leader Of the revolution movement

Page 7: Relgious schism

Filipino Republican Army

Page 8: Relgious schism

Oct. 21,1898 -Aglipay issued a letter to the Filipino clergy urging them To organize themselves into a cohesive body geared to national emergency.

Oct.22, 1898-Aglipay issued a manifesto asking -the Filipino clergy -to organize themselves and -take charge of all vacant parishes

Page 9: Relgious schism

VS.

Nozaleda Aglipay

Page 10: Relgious schism

April 29,1899-Nozaleda charged Aglipay with usurpation of power and he

excommunicate him on May 5.

- He also declared that Aglipay is a usurper and Schismatic.

- But Aglipay charged him of starving the people

Page 11: Relgious schism
Page 12: Relgious schism

Mabini and the National Church

Page 13: Relgious schism

Agilpay called an assembly at PaniquiTarlac on Oct.23, 1899

Agenda:•Filipinization of Catholic church•Prevention of anarchy in religious matter•Provisional constitution of the Filipino Church was framed

Page 14: Relgious schism

Mons. Placido Chapelle

On January 2 1902, He arrived at the Phillipines.He is known to be pro –friar and insulted the Filipino clergy

He said that they are incompetent thus holding menial position only on the Church

Page 15: Relgious schism

The schismInfluenced by Chapelle’s undiplomatic language

Salustiano Araullo and Jose Chanco-Filipino in Rome who laid the Filipino problem before the Pope

Pope John Paul II 

Page 16: Relgious schism

Isabelo de los Reyes-

“Enough of Rome!”1901-he campaigned relentlessly for the establishmentOf Filipino church. On July , he founded the Union Obrera Democratica

Page 17: Relgious schism

Pascual H. Poblete- scheduled a mass meeting at the Zorilla theater. But it did not take place………

That same night ,Isabelo de los Reyes called a meeting to his Union

Aglipay was appointed as Obispo maximo

Independent Church was Established

Page 18: Relgious schism

Executive comittee

• Priest:Adriano GarcesJ. BarlinManuel RoxasToribio Dominguez

However,….

They denied any connection with the independent church

•Trinidad H. Pardo

•Fernando Maria Guerero

•Martin Ocampo

•Manuel ortigas

Page 19: Relgious schism

Aglipay and the Jesuits

Father Francisco Foradada-

Dr. Leon Ma. Guerrero and Joaquin LunaInvited Aglipay to an interView at Jesuit house atSta. Ana Manila .

He Insulted the Filipino priest that urge Alipay to continue the schism

Page 20: Relgious schism

Now, let’s get to know their Doctrines …

Page 21: Relgious schism

Father Joaquin Villalonga

Deal with Aglipay after what Foradada had done and he urged him to come back to the catholic faith.

Aglipay is accompanied with young priest Santiago Fonacier

Page 22: Relgious schism

Consecration of Aglipay

Aglipay was consecrated on September 6 1902 as bishop and he also accept the position of supreme BishopOct. 26- First mass of Aglipay as supreme bishop Jan.18, 1903- He was consecrated as supreme bishop of the bishop of isabela , Cagayan, Pangasinan , Nueva Ecija, Cavite and Manila

Page 23: Relgious schism

They believe that …

Page 24: Relgious schism

• It is essentially naturalistic• Revelation is impossible• And so with miracles and

prophecies

1. All religions are good and equal.

Page 25: Relgious schism

2. The Gospels do not possess historical value.• Except for the book of Mark and

some Logia of Matthew.

• They believe in this because according to them the Gospel books are full of interpolations (addition or somethings).

Page 26: Relgious schism

3. The Bible is just like other books.

• According to them, the Bible is just like any other book like Mythology or a folklore of various people.

• It is not inspired and it is full of errors.

Page 27: Relgious schism

4. God Exists.

• According to them, we can form some idea of His nature.

• We cannot say He is the Creator in a strict sense.

• Trinity Person of God is denied.

Page 28: Relgious schism

5. ‘Creation’ is denied.• Existence of Angels and

Demons are also denied.

• Man is a product of evolution.

• The soul of man is material and comes from the soul of the parents, in the sense of generationism.

Page 29: Relgious schism

6. Existence of Grace is denied.

• The original sin is also expressly denied.

Page 30: Relgious schism

7. Jesus Christ Existed.• Even though if He existed they

believe that He was not the Messiah and He did not announce the Kingdom of God.

Page 31: Relgious schism

8. Divinity of Jesus is denied.

• They believe this because according to them Jesus was subject to errors and defects.

Page 32: Relgious schism

9. Death of Jesus was expiatory.

• He redeemed us not with His death but through His examples and teachings.

Page 33: Relgious schism

10. Mary is not the mother of God.

• Duh?! Obviously she’s not! God has no mother.

• They believe the virginal concept of Jesus by Mary.

• Her virginity was admitted but later denied.

Page 34: Relgious schism

11. There is no supernatural state of any kind, and

consequently no grace.• Charity for them is just natural love.• There’s no source of truth except reason.• Even human testimony seems without

validity.• Therefore, Faith does not exist.

Page 35: Relgious schism

12. Sacraments are ritual prayers.

• Baptism doesn’t cleanse the soul of original sin.

• Confirmation is merely ratification of baptism in adults.

• Eucharist is just a memorial and there is no transubstantiation.

Page 36: Relgious schism

• Penance is useful for counsel but there is no real absolution of sins because only God can forgive sins.

Page 37: Relgious schism

13. There is no ‘other life’.

• Death is the total penalty of our sins.

• There is no such thing as hell, heaven, purgatory, limbo for babies.

Page 38: Relgious schism

So what is their moral theology?

Page 39: Relgious schism

• Their moral theology is based on the assumption that the purpose of mans existence is HUMAN PROGRESS.

Page 40: Relgious schism

Be faithful still!

Thank you !