Upload
christophe-gueret
View
745
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Invited talk given during a meeting of the LinkedUp project, in Amsterdam on February 19.
Citation preview
Downscaling information systems
for educationChristophe Guéret (@cgueret)
Data Archiving and Networked Services
DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO
What do you mean "Downscaling" ?
● Alternative to up/out scaling platforms when the cost of doing it becomes too high
● "Cost" in the wide sense ○ Loss of expressivity via harmonization○ Loss of privacy○ Loss of consistency / incompatible semantics○ Hardware costs○ Infrastructural costs○ Cultural incompatibility○ ...
Up / out scaling
● Get more and more data into one system● Scale vertically (up) or horizontally (out)
Down scaling
● Instead of one big (cluster) system, use a swarm of smaller systems
● Aim at highest meaningful granularity
2 downscaled systems for education
● Information system for researchers willing to study Worldwide academic activity
● ~2M young learners willing to go social with digital media, but without Internet
Diversity aware publication ofactivity of research institutions
Context
● Millions of researchers active Worldwide
● Represents lot of information about○ Positions○ Teaching activities○ Equipment○ Discoveries○ ...
● Potential high value in sharing all that data and mining it
Problems
● Lots of name-centric, thus highly ambiguous, data sets
● Different conceptual spaces
● Different positions that not always correspond○ "Maître de conférences" ~ "Universitair Docent" ~
"Assistant professor" ?
Towards THE information system (?)
● Try to be the "Facebook for researchers"● Eventual focus on sub-parts of the data
or THE ontology (?)
● Focus on the terminology, allow for different data stack (including non Web based)
Users end-up with a tough choice
● Do you prefer too specific or too generic ?
● Workaround: formats roundtripping
But data does not travel well...
● Publications from Frank van Harmelen● Decreasing number from system to system
148 38 13
Downscaling RIS
● Some of the harmonization high costs○ Large ontologies are hard to design○ Tradeoff coverage VS expressivity○ Large amount of data○ Lack of incentives to update one platform + branding
and reporting issues playing against
● Alternative○ Rely on a data ecosystem○ Use several, layered ontologies
A research information ecosystem
Core ontology + national extensions
● Global scale insights and low level details
● Take advantage of reasoning
Cloud-less social interaction
Context
● XO laptop given to 2M kids aged 6-12
● Low-end hardware (~ old smartphone)
● Educational software based on constructivism
● Communication via Mesh-networking
The environment "Sugar"
Activities in Sugar
● A Sugar activity combines the concepts of “document” and “application” into a single object
● Activities can be easily shared between neighbouring computers
● Activity instances are associated with the document they let the user work on
Sharing activities
Journal of activity usage
Limitations of current data stack
● Data sharing limited to synchronous interaction
● Data isolated in silos
● No remote access to data created within a Sugar instance
● Social activity bounded by the classroom
Let's improve this, Web 2.0 way !
● Create a central server on the Cloud and define an API
● Create activities interacting via the API● Add a Web frontend for authentication and
adjust ACLs for the API
+ + =
Won't work because...
● Lack of stable, cheap, connection to Internet
● Lack of relevant content on the Web to justify getting a connection
● Issues with having kids on social networks
● (Besides, potentially hard to find a business model for sharing kids' work)
Downscaled alternative
● Turn every XO into a self-contained data publisher/consumer
● Apply Linked Data principles to achieve decentralised data integration
More information
● Collection of presentation about this and other topics○ http://www.slideshare.net/cgueret
● Blog about making data sharing a reality for everyone○ https://worldwidesemanticweb.wordpress.com/