Upload
airish
View
728
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Fertilization of Nordmann and Noble fir
Austria, CTRE 2011
Chal Landgren, Oregon State University
Foliar and Soil Applied Fertilization
Field Greenhouse
Fertilization-Greenhouse trial
Treatments- yr.1•No Fert.
•Controlled Release (CRF)-13 month (18-5-9)
•Foliar only – Helena & Wilbur-Ellis product- 2 applic.
•Foliar with exclusion- 2 applic
• CRF + Foliar (2 applic)
Fertilization Greenhouse Trail
Treatments- yr. 2•No Fert.
•Urea-Sul-3 split applications
•Foliar only – Helena & Wilbur-Ellis products- 2 applic.
•Urea-Sul +OrCal (Ca product)
•Urea-Sul applied in September- 3 tmts
•Urea-Sul + foliar-yr. 1.
Fertilization- Materials
Helena-Kayphol (0-5-32); CoBo (12-0-0; 5% B) &
PhosCalZn (4-15-0) each at 1.8 l/ha.
Wilbur-EllisPerfection Berry Mix- (13-8-8 + minors) at
19 l/ha.Osmocote- CRF (18-5-9) 13 mo. 182 gm./potUrea-Sul- (33-0-0-12) 112 kg/ha. split-3 applic.OrCal (Surround)- 1.8 l/ha.
Fertilization Greenhouse
Measurements •Initial- Caliper, height, leader, weight, foliar levels•During- pour through water•Later- foliar, weight, height, leader, caliper, foliage color
Fertilization yr. 1-Nordmann fir
Foliar levels-Nordmann- yr.1
N P K Ca Mg S B
Species Tmts Location % % % % % % ppm
Nordmann 1.FH NWREC 1.19 0.181 0.77 0.23 0.127 0.093 17
Nordmann 2.FW NWREC 1.14 0.159 0.64 0.16 0.11 0.074 10
Nordmann 3.U+H NWREC 1.09 0.168 0.75 0.15 0.104 0.078 20
Nordmann 4. C NWREC 0.98 0.162 0.69 0.15 0.101 0.075 9
Nordmann 5.U NWREC 1.71 0.168 0.84 0.21 0.133 0.108 7
Nordmann6.U+O
C NWREC 1.91 0.18 0.98 0.25 0.141 0.139 25
Foliar N%-Nordmann (year 2)
Tree Response- Results after 2 years
Fertilization- Color Response Nordmann
Summary-Greenhouse
•Soil applied materials alone is sufficient.
•Exclusion of foliar material made little difference
•Late season soil applications- modest foliar N increase; not visible
•Now, out planted
Christmas Tree Field FertilizationTreatments
No fert.Soil applied onlySoil + foliar Foliar only
Nordmann- 1 site no prior fertilization- 6 Treatments- 2 foliar, foliar + Urea-Sul, Urea-Sul, Control
Fertilization-Nordmann-1 yr. later
Stone Mountain Site- 2 yrs. of Foliar +Soil Applied
Stevenson Site- 2 Years of Foliar- No soil applic.
Summary Field Trials
•The “SHOW ME” test results would be- “All the trees look just fine, thanks”•No apparent benefit for P and K from foliar applic.•Soil complicates things-variation in foliar N levels not consistent.
Management Implications
•Bulked foliar samples are adequate for most decisions•Improvement in growth/color is slow- best not to get to that point•Foliar fertilization not needed•Growers continue to apply foliar products, unless trials were on their farms