Upload
maggiewinslow
View
413
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
These are slides I used for a talk in 20132 on rethinking GDP in light of ecological economic concepts
Citation preview
Ecological Economics and the GDP
Maggie Winslow, Ph.D.
http://www.bea.gov/national/pdf/dpga.pdf National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) tables
GDP = Consumption +
Investment +
Government Spending +
Net Exports
Y = C + I + G + NX
Firms Households
$
Goods and Services
Labor
$Environment
Classic Diagram Explaining GDP
Savings/Investment
Taxes/ Government Spending
Imports/Exports
Savings/Investment
Taxes/ Government Spending
Imports/Exports
Firms Households
$
Goods and Services
Labor
$Ecosystem
Classic Diagram Explaining GDP
Savings/InvestmentTaxes/ Government SpendingImports/Exports
Savings/InvestmentTaxes/ Government SpendingImports/Exports
Diagram from Ecological Economics
Ecosystem
matterenergy
matterenergy
recycling
heat
Economy
ThroughputThroughput
GD
PG
DP
Raw MaterialsRaw MaterialsWasteWaste
Goods and Services
Goods and Services
Resource Resource Degradation/Degradation/
PollutionPollution
ThroughputThroughput
The faster the throughput, the faster the depletion and degradation and the more “lost
opportunity.”
Resource DepletionResource Depletion
Limits to Growth
Ecosystem’s capacity to 1. Regenerate renewable resources2. Restore ecosystem services
Technological capacity to3. Recycle and/or substitute non-renewable resources
1. Within the regenerative and 2. Re-absorptive capacity of the environment and 3. Within our capacity to recycle or replace non-
renewables.
If we are using resources faster then this, we are drawing down natural capital.
It isn’t income, it is capital spending.
Throughput has to be:
• Renewable resources• Non-renewable resources• Ecosystem services
Can't man-made capital make up for natural capital?
Constraints:•Lack of technical knowledge•Thermodynamic (energy) limits
Natural Capital is Valuable
The value delivered by the biosphere is estimated to be in the range of US$33 trillion per year (1997).
Global economy delivers US$18 trillion per year. -The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. NATURE, VOL 387, 15 MAY 1997
Urban forests in Tennessee provide an estimated:
•$204 million per year in pollution removal•$66 million per year in energy savings
http://worldlandscapearchitect.com/tennessees-urban-forests-valued-in-the-billions-2/#.T2p8osrN6dM
Annual cost of global forest loss: $2 - $5 trillionhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7662565.stm
Solutions?
Recognize the Value of Natural Capital • TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and
Biodiversity www.teebweb.org• WAVES – Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of
Ecosystem Services www.wavespartnership.org
Incorporate this Value into national measures of income.
Easier said than done…
Create Alternative Indicators
• Add to existing GDP – example, add depreciation of natural capital.
• Enlarge GDP to include more information:• Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare• Genuine Progress Indicator
• Use additional indicators to support GDP• Environmental indicators• Social indicators
Y= C+I+G+NXIncome (Y, GDP) = consumption
+ investment+ government
spending+ net exports
Y= C+I+G+NX Consumption
• Cg - Consumption of non-durable goods and energy-intensive services
• Cs - Consumption of human-capital intensive services
• Cm - Household investment in consumer durables.
We need to limit Cg but can let the others grow.
Y= C+I+G+NX Investment
• Ime - Investment in energy-intensive manufactured capital
• Imc - Investment in energy-conserving manufactured capital
• In - Investment in natural capital
• Ih - Investment in human capital
Here we need to limit Ime.
Y= C+I+G+NX Government Spending
• Gg - Non-durable goods and energy-intensive services
• Gs - Human capital-intensive services
• Gme - Investment in energy-intensive manufactured capital
• Gmc - Investment in energy-conserving manufactured capital
• Gn - Investment in natural capital
• Gh - Investment in human capital
Here we need to limit Gg and Gme.
Human Capital EconomicProduction
Process
GoodsandServices
EvolvingCulturalNorms andPolicy
Well Being(Individual andCommunity)
Consumption(based on changing,adapting preferences)
Education, training,research.
Building
Investment(decisions about, taxescommunity spending,education, science andtechnology policy, etc., basedon complex propertyrights regimes)
Individual Public
GDP
Wastes
Common
Ecologicalservices/amenities
having, being
- having,- being
negative impacts on all forms of capital
being, doing, relating
Restoration,
ConservationNatural Capital
ManufacturedCapital
having
positive impacts on human capital capacity
doing, relatingComplex propertyrights regimes
SolarEnergy
Social Capital
Lim
ited
Su
bst
ituta
bili
tyB
etw
ee
n C
ap
ital F
orm
s
Model of the Ecological Economic System
Waste heat
Institutionalrules, norms, etc.
Materially closed earth system
From: Costanza, R., J. C. Cumberland, H. E. Daly, R. Goodland, and R. Norgaard. 1997. An Introduction to Ecological Economics. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, 275 pp.