Panel on ORCID integrations by publishers

orcid.org Contact Info: p. +1-301-922-9062 a. 10411 Motor City Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda, MD 20817 USA

Connecting Research and Researchers: How ORCID is Facilitating the Interoperable Exchange of Information 30 May 2014 Society for Scholarly Publishing Boston

Rebecca Bryant, PhD Director of Community, ORCID

[email protected] @ORCID_ORG

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881

Why we need a persistent identifier J. Å. S. Sørensen

J. Aa. S. Sørensen

J. Åge S. Sørensen

J. Aage S. Sørensen

J. Åge Smærup Sørensen

J. Aage Smaerup Sørensen

2

http://ands.org.au/newsletters/share_issue18.pdf

•  Common names •  Multiple names/transliterations •  Name changes, esp. for women

What is ORCID?

The ORCID •  Unique, persistent

identifier for researchers & scholars

•  Free to researchers •  Can be used throughout

one’s career, across professional activities, disciplines, nations & languages

•  Embedded into workflows & metadata

•  API enables interoperability between siloed systems

The ORCID Organization •  Non-profit, non-

proprietary, open, and community-driven

•  Global, interdisciplinary •  Supported by the

membership of organizations using the ORCID API

§  Funding organizations §  Professional societies §  Universities & research

institutes §  Publishers

3 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881

Facilitating interoperable exchange of information

The ORCID API enables the exchange of information between systems:

•  Less time re-keying

•  Improved data •  Easier

maintenance •  Better sharing

across systems 4

Grants

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881

Repositories

Researcher Information

Systems

Publishers

Other identifiers Society

membership

Adoption and Integration

5

ORCID has issued over 720,000 iDs since our launch in October 2012. Integration and use is international.

Publishing 27%

Universities & Research

Orgs 39%

Funders 7%

Associations 15%

Repositories & Profile Sys

12%

EMEA 35%

Americas 50%

AsiaPac 15%

Over 130 members, from every sector of the international

research community

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

Oct

N

ov

Dec

Ja

n Fe

b M

ar

Apr

M

ay

Jun Jul

Aug

Se

p O

ct

Nov

D

ec

Jan

Feb

Mar

A

pr

Creator

Website

Trusted party

Who is Integrating and How?

6

•  Research Funders •  Universities and Research Orgs •  Publishers •  Professional Associations

For a list of organizations and integrations see http://orcid.org/organizations/integrators

7

“Where possible, it is also recommended that contributors be uniquely identifiable, and data uniquely attributable, through identifiers which are persistent, non-proprietary, open and interoperable (e.g. through leveraging existing sustainable initiatives such as ORCID for contributor identifiers and DataCite for data identifiers).” European Commission H2020 Grantee Guidelines http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf

http://biomedicalresearchworkforce.nih.gov/tracking-system.htm#d

Funders

“Greater precision and transparency of the research outputs linked to a particular funder or grant is vital to help us better understand the impact of our funding.” Liz Allen, Head of Evaluation, Wellcome Trust http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-3168

§  Funding organizations are requesting ORCID iDs

§  Funders have the potential to capture ORCID information to improve grant submission process for researchers

8

•  NIH •  DOE, Office of Scientific & Technical Information (OSTI) •  FDA •  Autism Speaks •  Wellcome Trust •  National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) •  Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (Portugal) •  Japan Science & Technology Agency (JST) •  National Institute of Informatics (NII), Japan •  Swedish Research Foundation •  Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF)

How are Universities Integrating?

9

For more on university integrators see http://orcid.org/organizations/researchorganizations

•  Researcher Information Systems •  Institutional Repositories •  Electronic Theses & Dissertations (ETDs) •  Campus directories (LDAP) •  Record creation for faculty and students

Member organizations U.S. Institutions

•  Boston •  Brown •  Caltech •  Carnegie Mellon •  Cornell •  Harvard •  MIT •  MSKCC •  Notre Dame •  NYU Langone Medical Center •  Penn State •  Purdue •  Stony Brook •  Texas A&M •  University of Colorado •  University of Kansas •  University of Michigan •  University of Missouri •  University of Washington •  University of Virginia

Worldwide •  Cambridge •  CERN •  Chinese Academy of Sciences •  European Bioinformatics Institutes

(EMBL-EBI) •  Consorcio Madroño •  Glasgow •  Korea Institute of Science &

Technology Information (KISTI) •  Oxford •  Stockholm •  University College London •  University of Hong Kong •  University of Sydney

10

For more on university integrators see http://orcid.org/organizations/researchorganizations

•  Creating ORCID iDs for: •  10,000+ grad students •  All postdocs •  All faculty •  Also tying to ETDs &

campus directory •  Why?

•  Having an ORCID iD is part of your professional identity as a scholar

•  A persistent identifier will help TAMU track future career outcomes

University Case study:

Works are discoverable—and distinguishable

from others—by iD, not just name

Publishers requests

ORCID iDs in manuscript submission

ORCID iD is a part of the metadata—in addition to the author’s

name

Data then flows into

search tools like PubMed, Scopus, and

WOS

Works discoverable—and distinguishable from others—by iD, not just name

Publishers

Publishing community members Publishing Members: AIP Publishing, AIRITI, Aries, Atlas, Copernicus, EBSCO, Editage, Elsevier, EDP Sciences, eJournal Press, eLife, Epistemio, Flooved, Hindawi, Infra-M Academic Publishing, Jnl Bone and Joint Surgery, Karger, Landes Bioscience, National Academy of Sciences, Nature, Oxford University Press, Peerage of Science, PLOS, RNAi, ScienceOpen, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Wiley, Wolters Kluwer Association Members: American Astronomical Soc, American Chemical Soc, ACSESS, AAAS, American Geophysical Union, American Mathematical Soc, American Psychological Assn, American Physical Soc, American Soc Microbiology, American Soc Civil Engineers, Assn Computing Machinery, Electrochemical Society, IEEE, IOP, Modern Language Assn, OSA, Royal Soc Chemistry, Soc Neuroscience

13

Suggested Practices for Collection & Display of ORCID Identifiers

•  Add authenticated collection of ORCID identifiers to your manuscript submission process.

•  NEVER let an author type in an iD.

•  Encourage all authors publishing in your journal to obtain an ORCID identifier.

•  Ensure that iDs are included in the XML submitted to CrossRef and other repositories.

•  Display ORCID iDs in publication.

14

Recognizing reviewer service

•  Acknowledge Peer Reviewers

•  Link Authors, Reviewers, Members, and Meeting Participants

13 June 2014 orcid.org 15

Resources available on ORCID Publishers page: http://orcid.org/organizations/publishers/learnmore



Learn more

16

http://orcid.org/organizations/publishers/learnmore

ORCID Membership Member organizations may use the member API to: •  Read information from an ORCID record

•  Send data such as publications to ORCID records •  Integrate a search and link wizard to enable researchers

to connect with their works •  Link ORCID identifiers to other IDs and registry

systems •  Create ORCID records on behalf of employees or

affiliates

17

•  Find out more at http://orcid.org •  More on membership at http://orcid.org/about/

membership •  Learn about tools to embed ORCID iDs at http://

support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/ •  Attend an outreach meeting http://orcid.org/events •  Subscribe to our blog at http://orcid.org/about/news

and follow @ORCID_Org on Twitter •  Contact me at [email protected]

18 13 June 2014 orcid.org

Thank you!

| 1

Michael Habib, MSLS Sr. Product Manager, Scopus [email protected] twitter.com/habib orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

Connecting researchers with themselves: How ORCID consolidates identity across the scholarly communication ecosystem

Society for Scholarly Publishing - Boston, MA - May 30 2014

mailto:[email protected]

https://twitter.com/habib

https://twitter.com/habib

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

| 2

Researcher

EES

Scopus SciVal/ Pure

2

Elsevier’s spaces in the ecosystem

| 3

Researcher

EES

Scopus SciVal/ Pure

3


| 4

Scopus

| 5

Scopus Profile Organization

| 6

Dr. James Smith 46533489

ORCID Mission: ORCID aims to solve the name ambiguity problem in research and scholarly communications by creating a central registry of unique identifiers for individual researchers

The Solution: The ORCID Registry

Dr. Smith Dr. J. Smith Dr. James Smith

| 7

Authors can use Scopus to populate their ORCID profile via Scopus Author Profiles, the Scopus2ORCID Wizard at orcid.scopusfeedback.com or from ORCID!

| 8

First look! – Expected release: Sunday

| 9

https://orcid.org/statistics

Retrieved:30-May-2014

https://orcid.org/statistics

| 10

Elsevier Research Intelligence

| 11

11


| 12

Retrieved: 19/05/2014


| 13

FCT Portugal Evaluation of R & D units in 2013


| 14

Pure: Create, manage and report on your researcher's

ORCID IDs

• February 2014 – Release 4.18 - Link your ORCID license to Pure and automatically create and

verify ORCIDs within Pure - Monitor your researcher's use of ORCIDs within Pure and create

reports of the content linked to them

| 15

Add or Create an ORCID ID from main profile page in Pure

| 16

Create an ORCID ID (via Web Services) with pre-filled data

| 17

Jisc-ARMA ORCID pilot project – HEI based projects

“In particular, the objectives are: • to explore the embedding of ORCID iDs in institutional systems and workflows • to assess costs, benefits and risks of ORCID implementation • to gather evidence and recommend how to proceed – if appropriate – with

national ORCID membership” (Retrieved 19/05/2014 from http://orcidpilot.jiscinvolve.org/wp/ )

Aston University “We intend to embed ORCID IDs into the HR system (CORE) so that new staff joining the university beyond this project will be required to register for ORCID as part of the employment process. The implementation plan, training materials and guidance notes will then be made available for use by other universities using PURE” University of York “Information about research outputs from the University is automatically shared between Pure and White Rose Research Online, our shared ePrints repository. Using ORCID to help with this interoperation is a real potential benefit and an important part of the project”

(Retrieved 19/05/2014 from http://orcidpilot.jiscinvolve.org/wp/hei-based-projects/ )

http://orcidpilot.jiscinvolve.org/wp/









| 18

Search by ORCID ID for Scopus Author Profiles

Expected Q3/Q4 – Design above representative Pure will be a be able to retrieve Scopus Author ID (and associated documents) via ORCID ID search on Scopus APIs Expected Q4/Q1 - Search by ORCID ID for Documents Populate a CRIS with new documents published with an ORCID and Indexed in Scopus

| 19

Elsevier Editorial System (EES)

| 20 | 20

Adoption by Authors in EES

2

0

14.7 15.1 15.3 15.6 15.8 16 16.3 16.6 16.8 17.1 17.4 17.6 17.8 18 18 18.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

31-Jan 07-Feb 14-Feb 21-Feb 28-Feb 07-Mar 14-Mar 21-Mar 28-Mar 04-Apr 11-Apr 18-Apr 25-Apr 02-May 09-May 16-May

% Submissions to Production with ORCID(s)

| 21 | 21

2

1

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

ORCID per Month

Series1

Series2

Series3

Profiles (Corresponding Authors ORCIDs delivered to Production

| 22 | 22

2

2

ORCID in EES Statistics

Total number of profiles (corresponding authors) with ORCID IDs 111950

Total number of co-authors with ORCID IDs 148111

Submissions with ORCID ID in various stages 262492

Total submissions still in peer review in process 199718

Total submissions delivered to Production with one or more ORCIDs 62774

Total number of ORCIDs delivered to Production in the JSON file 64856

| 23

Researcher

EES

Scopus SciVal/ Pure

23


| 24

% Awareness of ORCID among research community

14% of the researchers have registered, 5 points higher than Q2 13

6% 8% 9% 10%

9%

11% 14% 14% 15%

20%

23% 24%

Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14

Aware and registered

Aware but not registered

Base (Q2 ‘13 – Q1 ‘14): All respondents 5,361, Scopus 1,189

http://m2id.org/

Community built by Keita Bando, Mendeley Advisor and ORCID Ambassador

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-8891

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-8891

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-8891

http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/keita-bando/

http://orcid.org/blog/2013/08/06/orcid-ambassadors-support-outreach-activities-across-globe

| 26

Announcing the ORCID Plugin for the Wordpress

blogging platform

• Released May 22 2014 as part of ORCID Codefest • Author posts with your ORCID ID • Add your ORCID ID to comments

| 27

www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence

Thank you!

Michael Habib, MSLS Sr. Product Manager, Scopus [email protected] twitter.com/habib orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

ORCID @ PLOS in 8 Steps !Martin Fenner http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-2405

Allow authors to enter ORCID identifier in manuscript submission system

2

1

8% of corresponding authors did so when PLOS enabled this feature last summer

Allow contributors to enter ORCID identifier in their profile page

3

2

1,052 contributors did so since February 2014

http://blogs.plos.org/tech/orcid-plos/

Unify contributor information across all systems and services

4

3

Many other systems …

Include ORCID identifiers in metadata pushed to CrossRef and PubMed

5

4

NLM DTD 3.0

JATS 1.0

Use Ringgold/ISNI as institutional identifier for contributors

6

5

ORCID Profile

Pull in author information about past PLOS papers from ORCID Registry

7

6

12,303 ORCID profiles include at least one PLOS publication

Use ORCID for Single Sign-On

8

7

http://datacite.labs.orcid-eu.org/

Require ORCID identifiers for all contributions

9

8

• Allow authors to enter ORCID identifier in manuscript submission system

• Allow contributors to enter ORCID identifier in their profile page

• Unify contributor information across all systems and services

• Include ORCID identifiers in metadata pushed to CrossRef and PubMed

• Use Ringgold/ISNI as institutional identifier for contributors

• Pull in author information about past PLOS papers from ORCID Registry

• Use ORCID for Single Sign-On • Require ORCID identifiers for all contributions

10

FACULTY OF 1000’S ORCID INTEGRATION: CONNECTING OUR AUTHORS TO THEIR WORK

César A. Berríos-‐Otero, PhD Outreach Director, F1000Research

cesar.berrios-‐[email protected]

hMp://f1000.com hMp://f1000research.com

@f1000Research @f1000

WHY ORCID?

Full name: César A. Berríos Otero Normally: César Berríos

Only 6 are mine!

WHY ORCID? Full name: César A. Berríos Otero Normally: César Berríos For graduate school: César A. Berríos-‐Otero Same for F1000! Properly connect authors AND referees to their work! Assign proper credit where it’s due!

F1000PRIME

•  Faculty includes over 5000 peer-‐nominated scien]sts and clinical researchers and ~5000 Associates

•  Faculty Members select, rate and comment on the most interes]ng and important research ar]cles (2-‐3% of the life science literature) from ~3,700 journals

•  Assigns one of three posi]ve ra]ngs: Excep]onal (3 stars), Very Good (2 stars) or Good (1 star)

Directory of recommenda]ons of the best research in biology and medicine from a faculty of global experts. (Launched 2002)

Partners with ORCiD since August 2012

F1000PRIME PERSONAL HOMEPAGE

F1000PRIME ORCID INTEGRATION




FACULTY OF 1000

Directory of recommenda]ons of the best research in biology and medicine from a faculty of global experts. (Launched 2002)

Open science journal for life scien]sts that offers rapid publica]on and transparent peer review. (Launched 2012)

F1000RESEARCH

Open science journal for life scien]sts that offers rapid publica]on and transparent peer review. (Launched 2012)

Key features: •  All data included

•  Publica]on within a week

•  Transparent, post-‐publica]on peer review by invited referees

•  Accepts all sound science, including single findings, case reports, protocols, replica]ons, null/nega]ve results and more tradi]onal ar]cles

THE PUBLICATION PROCESS

•  The peer review process can take months – some]mes years. •  Aker rejec]on, start over again with another journal. •  This delays publica]on. •  Referees are anonymous.

THE PUBLICATION PROCESS – REVOLUTIONIZED!

•  F1000Research ar]cles are published online aker an in-‐house pre-‐refereeing check, on average, within 5 working days.

•  Peer review and revisions are carried out publicly by invited referees. •  Ar]cles with sufficient posi]ve referee reports are indexed in PubMed.

Approved

Approved with reserva]ons

Not approved




Approved


Not approved





Approved


Not approved

CASRAI-‐ORCID PEER REVIEW SERVICE PROJECT

•  Ar]cles as a researcher output is well recognised and credit clearly given

•  Many other researcher roles are not

•  One of the major ]me-‐consuming roles but a crucial one for scien]fic progress is as a reviewer but currently hard to provide credit

Referees are named

Referee report metrics

TASK: To develop a schema and a set of fields to describe peer review that is standardized and can be used by all for a variety of types of peer review.

CASRAI-‐ORCID PEER REVIEW SERVICE PROJECT

CASRAI-‐ORCID PEER REVIEW SERVICE PROJECT -‐ WHO’S INVOLVED

Project Manager Paul Ritchie (CASRAI)

Co-‐Chairs Laura Paglione (Technical Director, ORCID) Rebecca Lawrence (Managing Director, F1000 Research Ltd)

Working Group David Baker (Execu]ve Director, CASRAI) Laure Haak (Execu]ve Director, ORCID) Liz Wager (Consultant, Sideview and Visi]ng Professor, University of Split) Brooks Hanson (Director Publica]ons, American Geophysical Union) Ed Clayton (Senior Director of Strategic Funding and Grants Administra]on, Au]sm

Speaks) Paul A. Djupe (Professor, Denison University and Editor, Poli]cs and Religion) Dan Whaley (Founder, Hypothes.is)

CHALLENGES

•  Many types of peer review: o  Ar]cle peer review can be pre-‐ or post-‐publica]on, open, single-‐ or double-‐

blinded o  Grant peer review – varying levels of openness o  Conference peer review o  Tenure / REF peer review

•  Several categories of peer review: o  Formal evalua]on c.f. F1000Prime recommenda]ons o  Formal peer review o  Comment c.f. PubMed Commons, PubPeer, Hypothes.is

•  Also many reviewer roles, e.g. Editor-‐in-‐Chief, Sec]on Editor, Editorial Board member, Panel member

•  Significant amount of peer review leads to rejec]on so this can be harder to capture

AGREED SCOPE

Ar]cle peer review – all types of formal peer review, including other roles such as Editor

Grant review

Conference topic/mee]ng abstract review

Tenure review / REF review Other areas such as annota]on, commen]ng etc were decided to be out of scope for now.

✔

✔

✔

X

✔

NEXT STEPS

•  Drak recommenda]ons are due to be submiMed in June

•  CASRAI will translate these recommenda]ons into fully defined record-‐types, fields and classifica]ons for inclusion in the CASRAI dic]onary so they can be openly used by the broader community

•  ORCID will use the recommenda]ons to develop methods for linking review ac]vi]es with ORCID iden]fiers and for pos]ng review metadata to the ORCID Registry

•  Interested reviewers: [email protected].

NEXT STEPS

ADOPTION! Con]nue to ask authors, reviewers and users to register:

F1000Prime: 345 Faculty Members (out of ~11,000)

F1000Research: 48 Authors (out of ~1000)

Big announcement to our reviewers at the end of CASRAI project

ORCID everywhere at the American Geophysical Union

Brooks Hanson Director, Publications

[email protected]

About AGU

•  60,000 members worldwide •  19 journals; also books •  11,000 submissions/year from ~60,000 authors •  Fall Meeting >20,000 attendees each year;

20,000 abstracts from 50,000 authors •  4 different, large people databases all with

duplicates.

All Together Now…

•  4 different databases: peer review, member, abstracts, publisher (Wiley).

•  Integrating all into the member database but dream is seamless user experience

•  ORCID to help for 360 degree view of members (abstracts and papers)

•  SSO everywhere •  Pass ID’s of authors to Wiley and back to ORCID •  Recognize reviewers too

Timeline

2014 • Sync editorial and member databases • SSO and ORCIDs

2014? • Published papers back to ORCID from Wiley • Abstracts integrated

2015 • Peer review credits to ORCID • Full SSO between all databases

Challenges

•  So far uptake has been gradual/slow. Discussing how to accelerate.

•  Especially problematic for co-authors (email sent on submission but need to be more proactive) and reviewers

•  Co-authors of abstracts even more of a challenge.